Efficacy of tenofovir in patients with Lamivudine failure is not different from that in nucleoside/nucleotide analogue-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B

Comparing the efficacy and safety of tenofovir and adefovir or combined drug treatment for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) affects a vast population globally. A variety of drugs are available for the treatment of CHB, including tenofovir (TDF) and adefovir (ADV). However, the efficacy of monotherapy drug treatment is inconclusive, the safety and efficacy of TDF remain unclear, more data are needed to be included and combined drug treatment is considered to exhibit higher efficacy. To explore this issue, we performed a current literature review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ADV vs. TDF, TDF vs. ADV + lamivudine (LAM); TDF vs. ADV + entecavir (ETV).

METHODS

We systematically searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Chinese VIP, and Wanfang Data, for relevant clinical trials since July 2015, all included studies were based on PICOS principles and evaluated independently by the reviewers in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook (Rob2.0). A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

We included a total of 32 studies, including 31 randomized controlled trials and one retrospective study involving 2,473 patients. The results revealed a low risk of bias in included studies, that the virologic response of TDF was superior to ADV (P<0.05). And TDF was also superior to ADV in Serum creatinine levels, Immunologic function, and safety profile. However, when ADV was combined with other medications, it was superior to TDF in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and Tbil level and adverse reactions, but on other indicators, TDF was superior to drug combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed that TDF was superior to ADV in the parameters of ALT, hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA reduction, HBeAg-negative conversion rate, safety, and total bilirubin levels in patients with CHB. However, when ADV was combined with LAM or ETV, they often showed the same therapeutic effect as TDF in parameters such as ALT level and Tbil level and combined therapy can effectively reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions. In this study, because the sample source countries were limited, a greater number of global studies are needed in the future to verify the current findings.

A systematic review of hepatitis B virus (HBV) drug and vaccine escape mutations in Africa: A call for urgent action

International sustainable development goals for the elimination of viral hepatitis as a public health problem by 2030 highlight the pressing need to optimize strategies for prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Selected or transmitted resistance associated mutations (RAMs) and vaccine escape mutations (VEMs) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) may reduce the success of existing treatment and prevention strategies. These issues are particularly pertinent for many settings in Africa where there is high HBV prevalence and co-endemic HIV infection, but lack of robust epidemiological data and limited education, diagnostics and clinical care. The prevalence, distribution and impact of RAMs and VEMs in these populations are neglected in the current literature. We therefore set out to assimilate data for sub-Saharan Africa through a systematic literature review and analysis of published sequence data, and present these in an on-line database (https://livedataoxford.shinyapps.io/1510659619-3Xkoe2NKkKJ7Drg/). The majority of the data were from HIV/HBV coinfected cohorts. The commonest RAM was rtM204I/V, either alone or in combination with associated mutations, and identified in both reportedly treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced adults. We also identified the suite of mutations rtM204V/I + rtL180M + rtV173L, that has been associated with vaccine escape, in over 1/3 of cohorts. Although tenofovir has a high genetic barrier to resistance, it is of concern that emerging data suggest polymorphisms that may be associated with resistance, although the precise clinical impact of these is unknown. Overall, there is an urgent need for improved diagnostic screening, enhanced laboratory assessment of HBV before and during therapy, and sustained roll out of tenofovir in preference to lamivudine alone. Further data are needed in order to inform population and individual approaches to HBV diagnosis, monitoring and therapy in these highly vulnerable settings.

Management of chronic viral hepatitis in the hematological patient

INTRODUCTION

Infection with HBV and HCV represents a growing challenge in the management of patients with hematological malignancies. Recently, hepatitis E (HEV) was recognized as an endemic infection in developed countries and as an emerging health problem in immunocompromised patients. Areas covered: We reviewed the current knowledge on the impact of chronic viral hepatitis in the hematological setting. Epidemiological features, screening strategies and indications for treatment and monitoring have been explored and commented. Expert commentary: Knowing patient's complete HBV serostatus is mandatory in order to choose between treatment, prophylaxis or a pre-emptive approach. Recent guidelines favor treatment with high barrier molecules in all patients with chronic HBV infection and long lasting prophylaxis with those with inactive or resolved one. With regard to HCV, the new direct-acting antiviral agents have been safely administered in the hematological setting. Their use as first-line single treatment in indolent lymphomas, and combined with chemotherapy in aggressive ones, should be considered. Due to the existing risk of chronic HEV infection in the immunocompromised, screening with serum HEV-RNA should be performed in case of signs and symptoms indicative of hepatitis. In the event of HEV infection, reduction of immunosuppression and, if not feasible or unsuccessful, ribavirin treatment should be prescribed.

TDF Monotherapy Is Effective Regardless of Prior Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China

Background/Aims

Many patients had to transfer to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) if there is other nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) resistance. We aimed to investigate antiviral effects of TDF monotherapy between NA-naive and NA-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in China.

Methods

A total of 102 NA-naive and NA-experienced CHB patients with TDF monotherapy (300 mg/day) were retrospectively analyzed for useful parameters up to 72 weeks.

Results

There were 36 and 66 patients with matched HBV DNA baseline level in NA-naïve and NA-experienced group, respectively. There were no significant differences between NA-naïve and NA-experienced groups in HBV DNA levels (all P > 0.05) and HBV DNA undetectable rates (all P > 0.05) at all time points. At the end of follow-up, HBV DNA undetectable rates in NA-naïve and NA-experienced group were 96.2% (25/26) and 91.8% (45/49), respectively (P = 0.476). Baseline HBV DNA level was the only independent predictor for HBV DNA negative time (P = 0.018). In addition, 27.8% (5/18) and 11.4% (4/35) achieved HBeAg seroconversion at the end of the follow-up, respectively (P = 0.133).

Conclusions

TDF monotherapy was effective regardless of prior NA experienced. Baseline HBV DNA was a key predictive factor for HBV DNA negative time in TDF monotherapy.

Tenofovir has inferior efficacy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients compared to nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients

Background/Aims

A recent study reported that entecavir had inferior efficacy in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients compared to NA-naïve patients. We sought to compare the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in NA-experienced and NA-naïve CHB patients.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 252 consecutive patients who had a serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level greater than 2,000 IU/mL at the initiation of TDF treatment and who received TDF for at least 6 months. Complete virologic suppression (CVS) was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA. We generated a multivariate Cox proportional-hazard model to examine predictive factors that were independently associated with time to CVS.

Results

The mean age of patients was 48.2 years, and the cohort included 181 NA-naïve patients and 71 NA-experienced patients. The median duration of TDF treatment was 14.4 (interquartile range, 9.5-17.8) months. A total of 167 (92.3%) of 181 NA-naïve patients achieved CVS, and 60 (84.5%) of 71 NA-exposed patients achieved CVS. Forty-nine (89.1%) of 55 patients who previously took an NA aside from adefovir and 11 (68.8%) of 16 adefovir-experienced patients achieved CVS. In multivariable analysis, previous adefovir exposure significantly influenced time to CVS (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.72; P=0.003), after adjusting for HBeAg positivity, baseline HBV DNA level and cirrhosis.

Conclusions

Tenofovir had inferior efficacy in adefovir-experienced CHB patients compared to NA-naïve patients. The response of patients with previous adefovir exposure to TDF monotherapy should be monitored closely.

Treatment Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir-Based Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real Life Cohort Study in Korea

Background & Aims

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based therapy in naïve and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients for 96 weeks in Korean real life practice.

Methods

A total of 209 CHB patients with a prescription for TDF at the Seoul and Daejeon St. Mary’s hospitals were enrolled from December 2012 to October 2014. We compared the virological responses and evaluated the renal safety of treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients.

Results

An overall complete virological response (CVR) was achieved in 80.4% and 84.6% of patients at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. In a subgroup analysis, CVR at week 96 was present in 88.4%, 75.0%, 75.5%, and 83.3% of participants in the lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) group, adefovir-resistant (ADV-R) group, multidrug-resistant (MDR) group, and suboptimal response group, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, ADV-R, MDR, hepatitis B virus DNA, and hepatitis B e antigen were independent predictors for CVR. With regard to renal safety, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, and an initial low estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent factors affecting creatinine elevation (≥0.5 mg/dL). Moreover, two patients with DM and cirrhosis experienced TDF-related Fanconi syndrome.

Conclusions

TDF-based therapy demonstrated sustained viral suppression and favorable safety during a 2-year treatment period. The LAM-R and suboptimal response groups showed comparable efficacy to the naïve group, while the ADV-R and MDR groups were significantly associated with a low CVR. Close monitoring of renal safety should be mandatory when treating CHB patients receiving TDF, particularly those with DM and cirrhosis.

Virological Response to Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-Positive Patients with Lamivudine-Resistant Hepatitis B Virus Coinfection in an Area Hyperendemic for Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background

Sequential addition of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is often needed for patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) who develop HBV resistance to lamivudine after combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) containing only lamivudine for HBV. We aimed to assess the virological response of HBV to add-on TDF in patients coinfected with lamivudine-resistant HBV.

Methods

Between November 2010 and December 2014, 33 HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV and 56 with lamivudine-susceptible HBV were prospectively included. TDF plus lamivudine was used to substitute zidovudine or abacavir plus lamivudine contained in cART in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV infection, while patients with lamivudine-susceptible HBV infection received TDF plus lamivudine as backbone of cART. Serial determinations of plasma HBV DNA load, HBV serologic markers, and liver and renal functions were performed after initiation of TDF-containing cART.

Results

Of 89 patients included, 38.6% tested positive for HBV envelope antigen (HBeAg) at baseline. The plasma HBV DNA level at enrollment of lamivudine-resistant and lamivudine-susceptible group were 6.1 ± 2.2 log₁₀ and 6.0 ± 2.2 log₁₀ copies/mL, respectively (p = 0.895). The cumulative percentage of HBV viral suppression in lamivudine-resistant and lamivudine-susceptible group was 81.8% and 91.1% at 48 weeks, respectively (p = 0.317), which increased to 86.7% and 96.2% at 96 weeks, respectively (p = 0.185). At 48 weeks, 11 patients testing HBeAg-positive at baseline failed to achieve viral suppression. In multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with failure to achieve viral suppression at 48 weeks was higher HBV DNA load at baseline (odds ratio, per 1-log₁₀ copies/mL increase, 1.861; 95% CI, 1.204–2.878). At 48 weeks, HBeAg seroconversion was observed in 5 patients (1 in the lamivudine-resistant group and 4 in the lamivudine-susceptible group; p = 0.166). During the study period, HBsAg levels decreased over time, regardless of lamivudine resistance. Loss of HBsAg was observed in 3 (3.4%) patients in the lamivudine-susceptible group.

Conclusions

Add-on TDF-containing cART in patients coinfected with lamivudine-resistant HBV achieved a similar rate of HBV viral suppression compared to TDF-containing cART as initial regimen in patients coinfected with lamivudine-susceptible HBV. A higher baseline HBV DNA load and HBeAg positivity were associated with failure to achieve HBV viral suppression.

Antiviral Therapy in Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The relative efficacy of different strategies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-R) has not yet been systematically studied. Clinical trials were searched in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CNKI databases up to February 15, 2016. Nine trials including 764 patients met the entry criteria. In direct meta-analysis, TDF showed a stronger antiviral effect than any one of ETV, LAM/ADV, and ADV against LAM-R hepatitis B virus. LAM/ADV therapy was superior to ADV in suppressing viral replication. ETV achieved similar rate of HBV DNA undetectable compared to ADV or LAM/ADV. In network meta-analysis, TDF had higher rates of HBV DNA undetectable compared to ETV (OR, 24.69; 95% CrI: 5.36–113.66), ADV (OR, 37.28; 95% CrI: 9.73–142.92), or LAM/ADV (OR, 21.05; 95% CrI: 5.70–77.80). However, among ETV, ADV, and LAM/ADV, no drug was clearly superior to others in HBV DNA undetectable rate. Moreover, no significant difference in the rate of ALT normalization or HBeAg loss was observed compared the four rescue strategies with each other. TDF appears to be a more effective rescue therapy than LAM/ADV, ETV, or ADV. LAM plus ADV therapy was a better treatment option than ETV or ADV alone for patients with LAM-R.

Efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are no conclusive results on the efficacy of Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy between TDF and TDF-based combination therapy against LAM-R HBV in CHB patients.

METHODS

Randomized and non-randomized control trials directly comparing TDF and TDF-based therapy for treatment of LAM-R CHB patients, were searched in Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, database up to June 15, 2015. The data were analyzed with Review Manager (v.5.3).

RESULTS

Five articles (683 patients in total) met entry criteria. The overall efficacy of tenofovir-based combination therapy was not significantly better with regard to the rates of virological response (85.5% vs. 81.5%; RR=0.95, 95%CI=0.88-1.03, P=0.25), ALT normalization (61.9% vs.72.0%; RR=1.18, 95%CI=0.96-1.44, P=0.11) and HBeAg loss (17.0% vs. 18.1%; RR=1.40, 95%CI=0.78-2.49, P=0.26) compared with TDF monotherapy through 48-week treatment. Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that no significant difference was determined as TDF group compared to TDF-based group at 48weeks, in terms of rates of HBV DNA undetectability, ALT normalization and HBeAg loss in the treatment of LAM-R patients with prior failure of LAM monotherapy. Moreover, the rates of HBV DNA suppression between groups were similar through 24 or 48weeks of treatment in LAM-R patients with prior failure of LAM/ADV therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy is as effective as TDF-based combination therapy in maintaining viral suppression in LAM-R patients with prior failure of LAM or LAM/ADV therapy.

Modeling the functional state of the reverse transcriptase of hepatitis B virus and its application to probing drug-protein interaction

BACKGROUND

Herein, the predicted atomic structures of five representative sequence variants of the reverse transcriptase protein (RT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), sampled from patients with rapid or slow response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment, have been examined to identify structural variations between them in order to assess structural and functional properties of HBV-RT variants associated with the differential responses to TDF treatment.

RESULTS

We utilized a hybrid computational approach to model the atomistic structures of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/dATP and HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/TFV-DP (tenofovir diphosphate) complexes with the native hybrid DNA-RNA substrate in place. Multi-nanosecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/dATP complexes revealed strong coupling of the natural nucleotide substrate, dATP, to the active site of the RT, and the differential involvement of the two putative magnesium cations (Mg(2+)) at the active site, whereby one Mg(2+) directly bridges the interaction between dATP and HBV-RT and the other serves as a coordinator to maintain an optimal configuration of the active site. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) calculated in MD simulations of HBV-RT/DNA-RNA/TFV-DP complexes indicate no differential binding affinity between TFV-DP and HBV-RT variants identified in patients with slow or rapid response to TDF treatment.

CONCLUSION

The predicted atomic structures accurately represent functional states of HBV-RT. The equivalent interaction between TFV-DP and each examined HBV-RT variants suggests that binding affinity of TFV-DP to HBV-RT is not associated with delayed viral clearance.

The frequency and skewed T-cell receptor beta-chain variable patterns of peripheral CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T-cells are associated with hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion of chronic hepatitis B patients during antiviral treatment

The frequency and T-cell receptor beta-chain variable (TCRBV) patterns of peripheral CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T-cells (Tregs) are ambiguously altered in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment. Moreover, the clinical significance of these parameters in relation to hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion (SC) is largely unknown. In this study, the circulation of Tregs in HBeAg-positive CHB patients was determined by flow cytometry, and the molecular profiles of frequent TCRBV patterns of Tregs were analyzed using a gene melting spectral pattern. The parameters, such as Treg frequency, the number of skewed TCRBV patterns, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, were analyzed by comparing their associations in seroconverting and non-seroconverting patients following TDF treatment. The Treg frequency was significantly correlated with the ALT level in seroconverting but not in non-seroconverting patients. Similarly, skewed TCRBV patterns were remarkably associated with HBV DNA levels in the SC group. Six TCRBV families (BV3, BV11, BV12, BV14, BV20, and BV24) were more prevalent than other TCRBV members in seroconverting patients pretreated with TDF, while BV12, BV15, and BV22 were predominant in non-seroconverting patients during TDF treatment. Taken together, the preferential TCRBV patterns may be associated with immune responses related to SC. The dynamic frequency and skewed TCRBV patterns of peripheral Tregs could contribute to predicting SC in CHB patients. Moreover, the conserved TCRBV complementarity-determining region (CDR3) motif may be targeted to develop personalized immunotherapy for CHB patients.

Nephrotoxicity caused by oral antiviral agents in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated in a hospital for tropical diseases in Thailand

BACKGROUND

There is increasing concern about the potential for nephrotoxicity in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated long-term with nucleotide analogs.

METHODS

We examined renal dysfunction and its associated risk factors in patients with CHB treated with antiviral regimens containing either nucleosides or nucleotide analogs. We undertook a retrospective cohort study from 2006 to 2014 at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Bangkok, Thailand, and analyzed the data of 102 patients with a median follow-up time of 44.5 months (range 4-101 months).

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were treated with an antiviral regime containing a nucleoside analog, and 29 with a regime containing a nucleotide analog. Abnormally elevated serum creatinine concentration was observed in 12 patients (11.8 %) after 8 years of treatment. Thirty one percent of patients treated with nucleotide analogs had elevated serum creatinine levels and three of these patients (10.3 %) developed nephrotoxicity. In contrast, serum creatinine concentrations were elevated in three of the 73 patients treated with a nucleoside analog (4.1 %), and none developed nephrotoxicity. The incidence of renal dysfunction by the nucleotide analog regimen was cumulative, with 11.1, 21.0, 26.5 and 47.6 % of patients affected after 2, 4, 6 and 8 years, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that a nucleotide analog-based regimen significantly predicted renal dysfunction (odds ratio 10.5, 95 % confidence intervals 2.6-42.4, P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The long-term use of nucleotide analogs increased the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients with CHB. Thus, the regular assessment of renal function is recommended for all patients with CHB, particularly those treated with a nucleotide analog.

Tenofovir rescue therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients who failed previous nucleoside analogue treatment

Background

Tenofovir (TDF) is considered as the first line therapy for chronic hepatitis B. This study presents the results of TDF monotherapy in patients who failed previous nucleoside analogue treatment.

Methods

The study included 29 patients treated with TDF 245 mg once daily for 18 months after lamivudine monotherapy (LAM arm: n = 15) or sequential therapy with lamivudine and entecavir (LAM → ETV arm: n = 14). The previous antiviral therapy was discontinued due to lack of efficacy. All patients had HBV DNA between 2.1 and 8.23 log₁₀ IU/ml and 15 were HBeAg-positive, while 45 % of patients had increased ALT activity. Undetectable HBV DNA (<20 IU/ml) at months 3, 6, 12 and 18 was the primary endpoint in the study, while HBeAg/HBsAg loss/seroconversion and ALT normalisation were secondary endpoints.

Results

Primary nonresponse to TDF was not observed. HBV DNA was undetectable in 80, 80, 80 and 93 % in LAM arm and 50, 71, 86 and 86 % in LAM → ETV arm patients, at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months of TDF therapy, respectively. One patient achieved anti-HBeAg seroconversion. 86.5 % of patients had normal ALT activity at the end of the study. The baseline HBV DNA load, HBeAg status and the length of the duration of TDF therapy appeared significantly associated with the response to the therapy. HBV DNA clearance occurred faster in HBeAg-negative patients than in those positive for HBeAg.

Conclusions

TDF is an effective antiviral medication in patients with previous exposure to LAM or LAM and ETV. Final proportion of patients who achieved undetectable HBV DNA and had normal ALT activity in both arms, was similar.

Comparison of the efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir-based combination therapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major public health problem worldwide. Tenofovir monotherapy or tenofovir-based combination therapy have achieved promising results in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients who failed adefovir therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy compared with tenofovir-based combination therapy for treatment of adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS

randomized and non-randomized control trials directly comparing tenofovir monotherapy and tenofovir-based combination therapy were searched in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE database up to April 30, 2015. The data were analyzed with Review Manager (v.5.3).

RESULTS

Seven articles (total of 478 patients) met entry criteria. The results found that the rates of undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels (64.7% vs. 68.5%, P = 0.58 for 24 weeks; 71.4% vs. 71.7%, P = 0.76 for 48 weeks; 71.6% vs. 73.0%, P = 0.92 for 96 weeks), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (72.6% vs. 69.2%, P = 0.46 for 48 weeks; 72.8% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.74 for 96 weeks) and hepatitis Be antigen loss (5.0% vs. 0, P = 0.43 for 48 weeks; 16.5% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.43 for 96 weeks) were not significantly different between the TDF alone and the TDF-based group. Moreover, the rate of adverse reactions was also not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.06 for 96 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy and TDF-based combination therapy are similarly effective and safe in adefovir-experienced CHB patients after 48 weeks and 96 weeks of antiviral therapy. Nevertheless, large scale randomized control trials should be carried out to elucidate the long-term outcome of TDF treatment.

Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients after multiple antiviral failures

AIM

In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in Chinese chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after multiple nucleoside/nucleotide analog (NA) treatment failures.

METHODS

A total of 115 Chinese CHB patients with suboptimal response to two or more NA treatments were included in this study. All patients were changed to TDF (300 mg/day, oral administration) antiviral treatment for at least 72 weeks. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase (P) gene mutation screening for each patient was performed. In addition, virological, biochemical responses and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of each patient at weeks 12, 24, 48 and 72 of TDF treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-six out of 115 patients had drug-resistance mutations (R(+) ), including 27 with adefovir (ADV)-associated mutations (35.5%) and 49 with lamivudine (LMV)-associated mutations (64.5%). For all included patients, complete viral response (CVR) of HBV DNA (<100 IU/mL) was 57.4%, 69.6%, 74.8% and 86.1% at weeks 12, 24, 48 and 72 of TDF treatment, respectively. Alanine aminotransferase normalization and hepatitis B e-antigen seroclearance occurred in 77.3% and 23.2%, respectively, after 72-week TDF treatment. CVR at weeks 12, 24 and 48 was observed more commonly in patients with baseline HBV DNA of less than 10(6)  IU/mL. There was no significant reduction of eGFR induced by the TDF treatment.

CONCLUSION

Seventy-two-week treatment with TDF in Chinese CHB patients with previously multiple NA treatment failures exhibited effective and safe outcomes, which were independent of baseline mutations conferring ADV or LMV resistance.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has a substantial efficacy against multidrug-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with adefovir resistance (ADF-R) and suboptimal response to adefovir (ADF-S).

METHODS

Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve patients and patients with previous adefovir failure receiving tenofovir therapy for at least 6 months were included in the study. Biochemical and virological tests were obtained at baseline and 3-month intervals in the first year and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome measure was complete virological response (CVR) (HBVDNA < 20 IU/ml). CVR rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was generated to find out factors independently associated with CVR.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients (118 men, mean age 42 ± 12, 64 HBeAg(+) ) were included in the study. There were 105 patients in NA-naïve, 32 patients in ADF-S and 28 patients in ADF-R groups. All patients in the ADF-R group had multidrug resistance patterns. Mean duration of tenofovir treatment was 29 ± 14 months. CVR rates in NA-naïve, ADF-S and ADF-R groups were 65% vs. 75% vs. 58% at 12th month, 77% vs. 87% vs. 79% at 24th month and 83% vs. 94% vs. 79% at 36th month respectively. According to multivariate Cox regression model, HBeAg positivity (HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.36-0.86, P = 0.008), high baseline HBVDNA level (HR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.55-0.74, P < 0.001) and ADF-R (HR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.28-0.81, P = 0.006) were independent predictors for CVR. Seven patients encountered mild renal dysfunction and were managed by dose adjustments.

CONCLUSION

CVR rates during the follow-up show that tenofovir has a decreased, yet still potent in vivo efficacy against multidrug-resistant strains of HBV.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir in nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with genotype C chronic hepatitis B in real-life practice

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has demonstrated potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in clinical trials. Although its efficacy has been demonstrated in Caucasian populations, TDF has not previously been studied in Korean patients who present the predominance of HBV genotype C and of vertical or perinatal transmission.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TDF in Korean chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in real-life practice, and to determine the clinical variables that contribute to virologic response.

SETTING

Large academic medical center in Korea.

METHOD

We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of TDF treatment for more than 6 months in 151 nucleos(t)ide-naïve CHB patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary endpoint was a virologic response (VR), defined as an HBV DNA level of <12 IU/mL. Secondary endpoints were rates of alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) normalization, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, virologic breakthrough, and safety.

RESULTS

All patients were the genotype C2. The median duration of TDF treatment was 13 months (range 7-18 months). Ninety-two (61.0 %) patients were HBeAg positive. The mean pre-treatment HBV DNA level was 6.34 ± 1.42 log10 IU/mL. Among the 131 patients with elevated ALT levels at baseline, 128 (97.7 %) patients achieved ALT normalization during TDF treatment. VR was achieved in 97 (64.2 %) patients. The cumulative rates of VR at 6, 9, 12, and 18 months were 47.0, 59.4, 67.9, and 69.3 %, respectively. Among the 92 HBeAg-positive patients, 14 (15.2 %) patients achieved HBeAg seroconversion. In multivariate analysis, absolute HBV DNA levels at baseline (P < 0.001; OR 0.529; 95 % CI 0.560-0.744) and HBeAg positivity (P = 0.015; OR 0.731; 95 % CI 0.615-0.869) were significantly associated with VR. Virologic breakthrough was observed in four patients. These four patients had poor adherence to TDF. Most of the adverse events were mild in severity. No significant changes were observed in serum creatinine and phosphorus levels.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF was effective and well tolerated in Korean genotype C CHB patients in real life practice, consistent with larger registration trials. The absolute HBV DNA levels at baseline and HBeAg positivity were significantly associated with VR.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Entecavir and Tenofovir in Nucleos(T)ide Analogue-Experienced Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF) for the treatment of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients has been little studied. Here, we compare the efficacy of both ETV and TDF in NA-experienced CHB patients without detectable genotypic resistance. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive NA-experienced patients who had neither current nor previous genotypic resistance and had received ETV or TDF for at least 6 months. Overall, 202 patients (146 patients in the ETV group and 56 in the TDF group) were analyzed. The cumulative probabilities of complete virologic suppression (CVS) at month 12 were 76.1% in the ETV group and 95.0% in the TDF group (P<0.001), respectively. The TDF-treated group achieved CVS more rapidly than the ETV group for both Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative and -positive patients (P = 0.006 and < 0.001, respectively), and for those with both low (< 2,000 IU/mL) and high (≥ 2,000 IU/mL) HBV DNA levels (P = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). TDF group had an increased probability of achieving CVS (hazard ratio, 2.242; 95% confidence interval, 1.587-3.165; P = 0.001), after adjustment for HBV DNA level, the presence of HBeAg, and a history of CVS during prior treatment. During the treatment period, 23 patients (15.8%) in the ETV group developed virologic breakthrough, compared to none in the TDF group. The cumulative probabilities of developing virologic breakthrough and ETV-resistance at month 24 were 9.7% and 5.3%, respectively. In conclusion, TDF is preferable to ETV for achieving CVS in NA-experienced CHB patients without genotypic resistance.

Impact of prior lamivudine use on the antiviral efficacy and development of resistance to entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients

Background/Aims

To determine the efficacies of entecavir (ETV) in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients and in those with prior lamivudine (LAM) use who did not develop resistance.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 337 patients with CHB who were treated with ETV (0.5 mg daily) for at least 30 months. The study included 270 (80.1%) NA-naïve patients and 67 (19.9%) LAM-use patients. Ten of the LAM-use patients were refractory to LAM therapy without developing resistance.

Results

Genotypic resistance to ETV developed more frequently in the LAM-use group (13.1%) than in the NA-naïve group (2.6%) at 60 months (P=0.009). In subgroup analysis, after excluding the 10 patients who were refractory to LAM therapy, the cumulative probability of ETV resistance did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.149). Prior LAM refractoriness and a higher hepatitis B virus DNA level at month 12 were independent predictive factors for the development of ETV resistance.

Conclusions

ETV resistance developed more frequently in LAM-use patients with CHB. However, prior LAM use without refractoriness did not affect the development of ETV resistance. The serum hepatitis B virus DNA level at month 12 was a major predictor for the development of ETV resistance.

Efficacy of tenofovir switch therapy for nucleos(t)ide-experienced patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has been used in chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal virologic response to nucleos(t)ide analogues. The efficacy of tenofovir switch therapy has not been well studied in Asian patients.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir switch therapy in nucleos(t)ide-experienced patients, and identify the factors associated with treatment response of tenofovir switch therapy.

METHODS

Nucleos(t)ide-experienced hepatitis B e antigen-positive and -negative patients prescribed with tenofovir were retrospectively identified and recruited for prospective analysis. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and other biochemical parameters were monitored in regular 3-6 monthly follow-up visits. Primary efficacy endpoint was maintained-virologic response with tenofovir switch therapy, defined as undetectable HBV DNA (<20 IU/mL) until the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

An overall of 214/252 (84.9%) patients achieved maintained-virologic response after 22 (7-55) months of tenofovir switch therapy. On multivariate analysis, a lower HBV DNA level at the time of switching to tenofovir was an independent factor associated with treatment efficacy. Maintained-virologic response after switching to tenofovir was achieved in 177/190 (93.2%) patients with HBV DNA <20 000 IU/mL vs. 37/62 (59.7%) patients with HBV DNA ≥20 000 IU/mL (P < 0.001). Absence of genotypic resistance to lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil was not associated with improved treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenofovir switch therapy is an effective treatment strategy in nucleos(t)ide-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients. However, in patients with HBV DNA ≥20 000 IU/mL at the time of switching to tenofovir, the chance of achieving maintained undetectable HBV DNA is significantly reduced.

Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in nucleoside-analogue naive Iranian patients treated for chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a new effective treatment option for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate TDF efficacy in nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs)-naive Iranian patients with CHB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The NA-naive patients received TDF for at least six months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a complete virological response (CVR) during the treatment. Multivariate Cox regression analysis determined predictive factors independently associated with the time to CVR. The secondary endpoints were biochemical and serological responses, frequency of virological breakthrough, genotypic resistance development, safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

In all, 93 patients (64.5% hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-negative) were eligible. Of these, 70 patients completed 24 months of treatment. The cumulative CVR rates in HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive patients were 87% versus 53% at 24 months, respectively. The multivariate Cox regression model showed only HBeAg positivity at baseline and a high baseline HBV DNA level were independent factors predicting a CVR. No patient achieved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBeAg loss or seroconversion and no virologic breakthrough occurred. A new amino acid substitution (rtD263E) was observed to develop in 60% of patients with viremia.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative CVR rates showed that patients with HBeAg-negative have better virologic respond than those with HBeAg-positive during the same period. The rtD263E mutation might be associated with partial resistance to TDF.

Response to potent anti-HBV agents in chronic hepatitis B and combined effect of HBV reverse transcriptase mutations

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Response to nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy against HBV infection depends on a number of factors. One of them is appearance of drug resistance mutations. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ETV and TDF as anti-HBV agents and to analyze the role of HBV-RT mutations in reducing the efficacy of mentioned drugs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty nine treatment naïve CHB patients (mean age 33.8 ± 11.9 years) were enrolled and treated with ETV or TDF for one year. Complete virological response (CVR) was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA after 12 months of therapy. Amino acid and nucleotide sequence analyses of HBV-RT region were performed using Geno2pheno HBV drug resistance tool. The 3D model of HBV-RT protein was built by I-TASSER server and RMSD was calculated between wild type and mutated HBV-RT protein.

RESULTS

After 12 months of treatment, four CHB patients did not achieve CVR and all of them were with HBV genotype D. HBeAg seroconversion was achieved in 56% HBeAg positive patients after 12 months of antiviral therapy. The HBV-RT amino acid sequences from these four patients were used for in-silico analysis. It was found that the presence of many mutations in HBV-RT region of HBV isolated from these patients led to a high degree of variation in configuration of atoms of HBV-RT protein and also caused displacement of active site of this protein.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of antiviral drugs in inhibiting HBV replication may be reduced by combined effect of many HBV-RT mutations; however, an in vitro study is needed to validate the findings.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve and nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients

Background/Aims

This study investigated the antiviral effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naive and NA-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

Methods

CHB patients treated with TDF monotherapy (300 mg/day) for ≥12 weeks between December 2012 and July 2014 at a single center were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical, biochemical, and virological parameters were assessed every 12 weeks.

Results

In total, 136 patients (median age 49 years, 96 males, 94 HBeAg positive, and 51 with liver cirrhosis) were included. Sixty-two patients were nucleos(t)ide (NA)-naïve, and 74 patients had prior NA therapy (NA-exp group), and 31 patients in the NA-exp group had lamivudine (LAM)-resistance (LAM-R group). The baseline serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level was 4.9±2.3 log IU/mL (mean±SD), and was higher in the NA-naïve group than in the NA-exp and LAM-R groups (5.9±2.0 log IU/mL vs 3.9±2.0 log IU/mL vs 4.2±1.7 log IU/mL, P<0.01). The complete virological response (CVR) rate at week 48 in the NA-naïve group (71.4%) did not differ significantly from those in the NA-exp (71.3%) and LAM-R (66.1%) groups. In multivariate analysis, baseline serum HBV DNA was the only predictive factor for a CVR at week 48 (hazard ratio, 0.809; 95% confidence interval, 0.729-0.898), while the CVR rate did not differ with the NA experience.

Conclusions

TDF monotherapy was effective for CHB treatment irrespective of prior NA treatment or LAM resistance. Baseline serum HBV DNA was the independent predictive factor for a CVR.

Hepatitis B virus sub-genotype A1 infection is characterized by high replication levels and rapid emergence of drug resistance in HIV-positive adults receiving first-line antiretroviral therapy in Malawi

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that hepatitis B virus (HBV) sub-genotype A1 infections have mild outcomes and a low risk of drug-resistance among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving lamivudine-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) without tenofovir in Africa.

METHODS

The virologic expression of HBV sub-genotype A1 coinfection was studied over 12 months in HIV-positive adults starting stavudine/lamivudine/nevirapine in Malawi, using Sanger, deep, clonal, and single full-genome sequencing for the sensitive characterization of HBV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs).

RESULTS

Among 1117 subjects, 133 (12%) tested HBsAg-positive. After starting ART, retention rates were 96/133 (72%) at 6 months and 54/133 (41%) at 12 months. Based upon the last available follow-up, 92/96 (96%) subjects achieved HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL, 48/96 (50%) showed HBV DNA <14 IU/mL, and 24/96 (25%) acquired HBV RAMs. At 6 months, M204I was detected in 8/46 (17%) and 16/17 (94%) subjects using Sanger and deep sequencing, respectively. At 12 months, all viremic patients had multiple resistance and compensatory mutations coexisting on the same HBV genomes. Comparing HBeA-positive (67/133, 50%) with HBeAg-negative subjects, 64/67 (96%) vs 35/66 (55%) showed baseline HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL (P = .0006), 39/47 (17%) vs 9/49 (82%) had persistent HBV DNA detection during follow-up (P < .0001), and 23/47 (49%) vs 2/49 (4%) acquired HBV RAMs (P < .0001). Baseline HBV DNA levels were median 8.1 vs 5.3 log10 IU/mL in subjects with vs those without treatment-emergent RAMs (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

HBV sub-genotype A1 infections showed a severe virologic expression in HIV-positive Malawians. The findings strengthen the urgency of interventions to improve ascertainment and management of chronic hepatitis B in the region.

Antiviral effect of entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve and nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients without virological response at week 24 or 48 of therapy

We investigated the antiviral effect of entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve and NA-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients without virological response (VR, HBV DNA < 300 copies/mL) at week 24 or 48. A total of 369 NA-naïve and 181 NA-experienced patients treated with entecavir monotherapy were analysed. Of the 369 NA-naïve patients, 34 did not achieve VR at week 48. Of them, patients with HBV DNA ≤ 2000 copies/mL at week 48 achieved a higher VR rate than those with HBV DNA >2000 copies/mL (18/23 vs 3/11, P = 0.004). Two naïve patients with HBV DNA >2000 copies/mL developed entecavir- or lamivudine-resistant mutants. In 98 lamivudine-experienced patients without ever having lamivudine resistance, most patients with VR (72/72) and partial VR (300-10(4) copies/mL; 20/23) at week 24 or VR at week 48 (89/91) could maintain or achieve VR after prolonged therapy. In 75 patients with prior resistance to lamivudine, prolonged entecavir therapy led to low VR rate in those without VR at week 24 (13/45) or 48 (4/34) and high entecavir-resistance rate in those with or without VR at week 24 (6/30 with and 23/45 without) and 48 (8/41 with and 21/34 without). VR at week 48 was an independent predictor (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.33) for entecavir-resistant mutant development among the 75 patients with prior lamivudine-resistant mutants. In conclusion, prolonged entecavir treatment resulted in a poor response in naïve patients with HBV DNA >2000 copies/mL at week 48 and patients with prior lamivudine-resistant mutants without VR at week 24 or 48.

Factors associated with delayed hepatitis B viral suppression on tenofovir among patients coinfected with HBV-HIV in the CNICS cohort

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread use in HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the effectiveness of tenofovir (TDF) has not been studied extensively outside of small cohorts of coinfected patients with HBV-HIV. We examined the effect of prior lamivudine (3TC) treatment and other factors on HBV DNA suppression with TDF in a multisite clinical cohort of coinfected patients.

METHODS

We studied all patients enrolled in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems cohort from 1996 to 2011 who had chronic HBV and HIV infection, initiated a TDF-based regimen continued for ≥ 3 months and had on-treatment HBV DNA measurements. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazards to estimate time to suppression (HBV DNA level <200 IU/mL or <1000 copies/mL) by selected covariates.

RESULTS

Among 397 coinfected patients on TDF, 91% were also on emtricitabine or 3TC concurrently, 92% of those tested were hepatitis B e antigen positive, 196 (49%) had prior 3TC exposure; 192 (48%) achieved HBV DNA suppression over a median of 28 months (interquartile range: 13-71). Median time to HBV DNA suppression was 17 months for those who were 3TC-naive and 50 months for those who were 3TC exposed. After controlling for other factors, prior 3TC exposure, baseline HBV DNA level >10,000 IU/mL, and lower nadir CD4 count were independently associated with decreased likelihood of HBV DNA suppression on TDF.

CONCLUSIONS

These results emphasize the role of prior 3TC exposure and immune response on delayed HBV suppression on TDF.

Efficacy of tenofovir in adefovir-experienced patients compared with treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir (TDF) has similar antiviral efficacy in both treatment-naive and lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Data on TDF use in patients with adefovir (ADV) resistance is inconsistent. The aim of our study was to assess antiviral efficacy of TDF against nucleoside analogue-naive (NN) and ADV-resistant (ADV-R) CHB and suboptimal responders to ADV (ADV-S).

METHODS

A database of 135 CHB patients treated with TDF was analysed. A total of 37 patients with incomplete data were excluded and analysis was performed in 98 (44 NN, 30 ADV-R and 24 ADV-S). Patients with primary ADV-R mutations had either A181T/V or N236T mutations or both. HBV DNA was measured at 3-month intervals until month 24. Primary outcome measures were comparison of the decline of HBV DNA between the three treatment groups.

RESULTS

NN patients had higher baseline HBV DNA compared with ADV-R and ADV-S patients (6.08 log10 IU/ml versus 5.53 and 4.88, respectively; P=0.002). By exponential regression analysis, HBV DNA decline kinetics differed between the three groups. HBV DNA decline was faster in NN patients compared to ADV-R and ADV-S CHB patients (P=0.002 and P=0.004, respectively). Undetectable HBV DNA was achieved in 77.2%, 60% and 75% of NN, ADV-R and ADV-S CHB patients, respectively, at month 12 (P= not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA decline is slower in ADV-experienced patients compared with treatment-naive patients. The clinical significance of this slow response may be important in patients with critical liver reserve and high viral load. Optimal combination treatment (TDF+ entecavir) could be considered in these patients.

Similar evolution of hepatitis B virus quasispecies in patients with incomplete adefovir response receiving tenofovir/emtricitabine combination or tenofovir monotherapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Adefovir (ADV) resistance mutations induce low-level cross-resistance to tenofovir in vitro. Our aim was to compare viral kinetics, nucleos(t)ide analog resistance mutations, and quasispecies (QS) evolution during therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or emtricitabine + TDF (FTC/TDF) in selected patients with incomplete ADV responses.

METHODS

Patients with chronic hepatitis B and incomplete response to ADV were randomized in a double-blind trial of TDF vs. FTC/TDF. Extensive analysis of QS evolution was performed in 17 patients through 48 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

At week 24, 48% of patients (9/17) achieved HBV DNA undetectability (<69 IU/ml) with no difference between treatment groups. ADV and/or LAM resistance mutations were detected in all 17 patients at baseline and in 5/6 analyzable patients at week 48. A total of 1224 reverse transcriptase clones were analyzed. Clonal analysis revealed no significant difference at baseline in QS complexity or diversity between treatment groups. There was a trend in both treatment groups for an increase in QS complexity at week 12, followed by a decrease in complexity and diversity by week 48. Analysis of individual patients showed no consistent selection/accumulation of specific viral resistance patterns during treatment, but at week 48, mutations at rtA181 persisted in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF or FTC/TDF demonstrated strong viral suppression in patients with an incomplete response to ADV and no significant selective pressure on pre-existing ADV or LAM resistant strains. TDF monotherapy and FTC/TDF combination therapy had a comparable impact on QS evolution.

Influence of HIV infection on response to tenofovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

HIV worsens the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Suppression of HBV replication slows progression of liver damage. Information about the influence of HIV on response to tenofovir in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients is scarce.

METHODS

All individuals with persistent HBsAg+ at four clinics in Spain were identified. Information from the subset that initiated tenofovir therapy was examined.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients with chronic hepatitis B were evaluated, of whom 138 (78.4%) were coinfected with HIV. Prior lamivudine exposure was extensive in both groups, and nearly half of HBV viremic patients harboured drug resistance mutations. Most patients took tenofovir coformulated along with emtricitabine (Truvada). Of 101 HBV viremic patients at the time of beginning tenofovir (78 with HIV coinfection and 33 with HBV alone), a similar proportion achieved undetectable HBV-DNA at weeks 24, 48 and 96 of tenofovir therapy. Interestingly, HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with positive HBeAg showed a lower response than HBeAg-negatives. In multivariate analysis, however, baseline serum HBV-DNA was the only predictor of virological response to tenofovir.

CONCLUSION

The antiviral efficacy of tenofovir is similar in HIV/HBV-coinfected and HBV-monoinfected patients, achieving undetectable HBV-DNA nearly 90% of patients at week 96 of therapy. Baseline serum HBV-DNA is the major determinant of time-trends in virological response, with no significant influence of HBeAg, drug resistance mutations nor coinfection with hepatitis C or delta viruses.

Options for the management of antiviral resistance during hepatitis B therapy: reflections on battles over a decade

Although much advancement has been achieved in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, antiviral resistance is still a challenging issue. Previous generation antiviral agents have already developed resistance in a number of patients, and it is still being used especially in resource limited countries. Once antiviral resistance occurs, it predisposes to subsequent resistance, resulting in multidrug resistance. Therefore, prevention of initial antiviral resistance is the most important strategy, and appropriate choice and modification of therapy would be the cornerstone in avoiding treatment failures. Until now, management of antiviral resistance has been evolving from sequential therapy to combination therapy. In the era of tenofovir, the paradigm shifts again, and we have to decide when to switch and when to combine on the basis of newly emerging clinical data. We expect future eradication of chronic hepatitis B virus infection by proper prevention and optimal management of antiviral resistance.