Comprehensive evaluation of ciprofloxacin-aminoglycoside combinations against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains

Pharmacodynamic interactions of amikacin with selected β-lactams and fluoroquinolones against canine Escherichia coli isolates

Knowledge of in vitro antimicrobial interactions can serve as a guide for clinical application of combination antimicrobial regimens. The aim of the present study was to determine the pharmacodynamic interactions of amikacin with either amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, enrofloxacin or marbofloxacin against clinical canine Escherichia coli isolates. Bactericidal activity of individual antimicrobials was assessed by use of static kill curves. Interactions between amikacin and each of the β-lactams or fluoroquinolones were subsequently analyzed by employing the fractional maximal effect method. Amikacin, compared with all other agents, displayed the most rapid and extensive bacterial killing, the lowest level (with respect to MIC) at which half the maximal effect was observed and the most linear concentration-effect relationship. The combinations of amikacin with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ceftazidime were completely synergistic in four and three out of the five investigated isolates, respectively, with additivity being sporadically observed. On the other hand, the combinations of amikacin with enrofloxacin or marbofloxacin yielded a mosaic of interaction types with no discernible pattern or differentiation between fluoroquinolone-susceptible and resistant isolates; synergy was only infrequently observed, mainly at increased fluoroquinolone concentrations. In conclusion, the combinations of amikacin with the two β-lactams were found to be more promising, in terms of synergy achievement, compared with the respective combinations with the two fluoroquinolones.

Efficacy of ciprofloxacin-gentamicin combination therapy in murine bubonic plague

Potential benefits of combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of plague have never been evaluated. We compared the efficacy of a ciprofloxacin (CIN) and gentamicin (GEN) combination therapy with that of each antibiotic administered alone (i) against Yersinia pestis in vitro and (ii) in a mouse model of bubonic plague in which animals were intravenously injected with antibiotics for five days, starting at two different times after infection (44 h and 56 h). In vitro, the CIN+GEN combination was synergistic at 0.5x the individual drugs’ MICs and indifferent at 1x- or 2x MIC. In vivo, the survival rate for mice treated with CIN+GEN was similar to that observed with CIN alone and slightly higher than that observed for GEN alone 100, 100 and 85%, respectively when treatment was started 44 h post challenge. 100% of survivors were recorded in the CIN+GEN group vs 86 and 83% in the CIN and GEN groups, respectively when treatment was delayed to 56 h post-challenge. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Five days after the end of treatment, Y. pestis were observed in lymph nodes draining the inoculation site (but not in the spleen) in surviving mice in each of the three groups. The median lymph node log₁₀ CFU recovered from persistently infected lymph nodes was significantly higher with GEN than with CIN (5.8 vs. 3.2, p = 0.04) or CIN+GEN (5.8 vs. 2.8, p = 0.01). Taken as the whole, our data show that CIN+GEN combination is as effective as CIN alone but, regimens containing CIN are more effective to eradicate Y. pestis from the draining lymph node than the recommended GEN monotherapy. Moreover, draining lymph nodes may serve as a reservoir for the continued release of Y. pestis into the blood – even after five days of intravenous antibiotic treatment.

Early anti-pseudomonal acquisition in young patients with cystic fibrosis: rationale and design of the EPIC clinical trial and observational study'

BACKGROUND

The primary cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is progressive obstructive pulmonary disease due to chronic endobronchial infection, particularly with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa). Risk factors for and clinical impact of early Pa infection in young CF patients are less well understood.

PURPOSE

The present studies are designed to evaluate risk factors and outcomes associated with early Pa acquisition, and the benefits and harms of four anti-pseudomonal treatment regimens in young CF patients initiated after the first Pa positive respiratory culture.

METHODS

The Early Pseudomonas Infection Control (EPIC) program consists of two studies, a randomized multicenter trial in CF patients ages 1-12 years at first isolation of Pa from a respiratory culture, and a longitudinal cohort study enrolling Pa-negative patients. Using a factorial design, trial participants are assigned for 18 months to either anti-pseudomonal treatment on a scheduled quarterly basis (cycled therapy) or based on recovery of Pa from quarterly respiratory cultures (culture-based therapy). The study drugs include inhaled tobramycin (300 mg BID) for 28 days, combined with either oral ciprofloxacin (15-20 mg/kg BID) or oral placebo for 14 days. The primary endpoints of the trial are the time to pulmonary exacerbation requiring IV antibiotics or hospitalization for respiratory symptoms, and the proportion of patients with new Pa-positive respiratory cultures during the study. The broad goals of the observational study are to describe the risk factors and outcomes associated with early acquisition of Pa. 306 patients were randomized in the clinical trial and 1787 were enrolled in the cohort study.

CONCLUSIONS

These companion studies will provide valuable epidemiological and microbiological information on early CF lung disease and Pa acquisition, and safety and clinical efficacy data on anti-pseudomonal treatment strategies for early Pa infections in the airways of young children with CF.

Role of ciprofloxacin in its synergistic effect with fosfomycin on drug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the synergistic effect of ciprofloxacin (CPFX) and fosfomycin (FOM) on CPFX-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

METHODS

The synergistic effect was evaluated using the fractional inhibitory concentration index, acute bactericidal effect and morphological observation.

RESULTS

In the fractional inhibitory concentration index experiments, the combination of CPFX with FOM showed a synergistic effect in 20 of 74 (27.0%) strains of P. aeruginosa. From the morphological observations, it was determined that CPFX affected the outer membrane structure. CPFX combined with FOM caused striking morphological changes, resulting in bacteriolysis. A time lag experiment suggested that the addition of CPFX prior to FOM produced more pronounced bactericidal activity than the addition of FOM prior to CPFX.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the combination of CPFX with FOM induces a synergistic effect on CPFX-resistant P. aeruginosa strains. The role of CPFX is thought to be related to damage of the outer membrane, enhancing FOM penetration.

Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis

This comprehensive State of the Art review summarizes the current published knowledge base regarding the pathophysiology and microbiology of pulmonary disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). The molecular basis of CF lung disease including the impact of defective cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) protein function on airway physiology, mucociliary clearance, and establishment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is described. An extensive review of the microbiology of CF lung disease with particular reference to infection with P. aeruginosa is provided. Other pathogens commonly associated with CF lung disease including Staphylococcal aureus, Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and atypical mycobacteria are also described. Clinical presentation and assessment of CF lung disease including diagnostic microbiology and other measures of pulmonary health are reviewed. Current recommendations for management of CF lung disease are provided. An extensive review of antipseudomonal therapies in the settings of treatment for early P. aeruginosa infection, maintenance for patients with chronic P. aeruginosa infection, and treatment of exacerbation in pulmonary symptoms, as well as antibiotic therapies for other CF respiratory pathogens, are included. In addition, the article discusses infection control policies, therapies to optimize airway clearance and reduce inflammation, and potential future therapies.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa community-acquired pneumonia in previously healthy adults: case report and review of the literature

We report a case of rapidly fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a previously healthy 67-year-old woman. Eleven published case reports of P. aeruginosa CAP in previously healthy adults are reviewed. According to our review, the mean age of affected patients is 45.3 years. Five patients described in the literature were smokers with a mean smoking history of 40 pack-years. The clinical presentation is nonspecific, and although the pneumonia can be rapidly fatal, only 33% of the patients who were reported died. However, mortality may be independent of treatment within the first 36 hours of presentation. Exposure to aerosols of contaminated water is a risk factor for P. aeruginosa CAP in this population. Pseudomonas CAP should be considered in the differential diagnosis for anyone with a smoking history who presents with rapidly progressive pneumonia. We discuss treatment recommendations that are based on evidence in the currently available literature on the subject.

Monotherapy versus combination therapy for bacterial infections

The authors discuss the latest findings regarding the use of one or more antimicrobial drugs for a variety of infections. They offer suggestions for treatment based on a host of considerations, including the synergy and antagonism of specific drugs, type of infection, potential toxicities, and cost.

Bactericidal effect of pefloxacin and fosfomycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a rabbit endocarditis model with pharmacokinetics of pefloxacin in humans simulated in vivo

The bactericidal activity of pefloxacin and fosfomycin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was evaluated in an experimental rabbit endocarditis model after 24 h of treatment. Two strains with intermediate susceptibility to pefloxacin and good susceptibility to fosfomycin were tested. The serum kinetics obtained during administration of 400 mg every 12 h in humans were simulated in the animals using computer-controlled variable-flow infusion. Fosfomycin was administered as a continuous infusion at a constant flow, allowing a steady-state concentration of 47.4 +/- 11.9 mg/ml to be reached in serum. In valvular vegetations, pefloxacin was less bactericidal than fosfomycin, and in combination treatment, it reduced (but did not abolish) the bactericidal effect of fosfomycin. The duration of the pretreatment interval (12-48 h) had a negative effect on the bactericidal activity of both drugs, especially that of fosfomycin.

Attenuation of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats by fleroxacin

The effect of fleroxacin on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity was evaluated with female Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were injected during 4 or 10 days with saline (NaCl; 0.9%), gentamicin alone at doses of 10 and 40 mg/kg of body weight/12 h (subcutaneously), fleroxacin alone at a dose of 25 mg/kg/12 h (intraperitoneally), or the combination gentamicin-fleroxacin in the same regimen. Gentamicin induced a dose- and time-dependent renal toxicity as evaluated by gentamicin cortical levels, sphingomyelinase activity in the renal cortex, histopathologic and morphometric analysis, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels, and cellular regeneration ([3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA of cortical cells). The extent of these changes was significantly reduced when gentamicin was given in combination with fleroxacin. Although the mechanisms by which fleroxacin reduces the nephrotoxic potential of gentamicin are unknown, we propose that the fleroxacin-gentamicin combination enhances exocytosis activity in proximal tubular cells, as suggested by the higher excretion of urinary enzymes and lower cortical levels of gentamicin observed in animals treated with the combination fleroxacin-gentamicin compared with those treated with gentamicin alone. The protective effect of fleroxacin on gentamicin nephrotoxicity should be investigated further.

In vitro activity of trovafloxacin in combination with ceftazidime, meropenem, and amikacin

The in vitro activity of trovafloxacin alone and in combination with ceftazidime, meropenem, and amikacin was studied by determining the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for 111 gram-negative and 71 gram-positive bacteria. In addition, the synergy of these combinations against 46 strains of gram-negative and gram-positive organisms was studied by checkerboard titration and time-kill kinetics. Trovafloxacin exhibited excellent in vitro activity against all strains tested. Synergism was observed in 17% of the gram-negative strains and in 32% of the gram-positive strains. No antagonism was observed with any of the combinations tested.

In vitro pharmacodynamics of piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin alone and in combination against Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The time-kill curve methodology was used to determine the pharmacodynamics of piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam and the combinations piperacillin-ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam. Kill curve studies were performed for piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam at concentrations of 0.25 to 50 times the MICs for 13 strains of bacteria: four Pseudomonas aeruginosa, three Enterobacter cloacae, three Klebsiella pneumoniae, and three Staphylococcus aureus isolates (tazobactam concentrations of 0.5, 4, and 12 micrograms/ml). By using a sigmoid Emax model and nonlinear least squares regression, the 50% lethal concentrations and the maximum lethal rates of each agent were determined for each bacterial strain. For piperacillin-ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam, kill curve studies were performed with concentrations obtained by the fractional maximal effect method (R. C. Li, J. J. Schentag, and D. E. Nix, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:523-531, 1993) and from individual 50% lethal concentrations and maximum lethal rates. Ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam was evaluated only against the four P. aeruginosa strains. Interactions between piperacillin and ciprofloxacin were generally additive. At physiologically relevant concentrations of piperacillin and ciprofloxacin, ciprofloxacin had the highest rates of killing against K. pneumoniae. Piperacillin-tazobactam (12 micrograms/ml) had the highest rate of killing against E. cloacae. Piperacillin-ciprofloxacin with relatively higher ciprofloxacin concentrations had the greatest killing rates against S. aureus. This combination had significantly higher killing rates than piperacillin (P < 0.002). For all the bacterial strains tested, killing rates by ciprofloxacin were significantly higher than those by piperacillin-tazobactam (4 and 12 micrograms/ml had significantly higher killing rates than piperacillin alone (P < 0.02 and P < 0.004, respectively). The effect of the combination of piperacillin-ciprofloxacin, in which piperacillin concentrations were relatively higher, was not statistically different from that of piperacillin alone (p > or = 0.71). The combination of ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam achieved greater killing than other combinations or monotherapies against P. aeruginosa. The reduction in the initial inoculum was 1 to 4 logs greater with ciprofloxacin-piperacillin-tazobactam at 4 and 12 micrograms/ml than with any other agent or combination of agents. On the basis of the additive effects prevalently demonstrated in the in vitro study, the combinations of piperacillin-ciprofloxacin and piperacillin-tazobactam are rational therapeutic options. Greater killing of P. aeruginosa was demonstrated with ciprofloxacin-piperacillin--tazobactam. Since treatment failure of P. aeruginosa pneumonia is a significant problem, clinical studies are warranted.

Comparative efficacies of ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin alone or in combination with fosfomycin in experimental endocarditis induced by multidrug-susceptible and -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The in vivo efficacy of ciprofloxacin or pefloxacin alone or in combination with fosfomycin was evaluated in experimental aortic valve endocarditis induced in 133 rabbits by a multidrug-susceptible or multidrug-resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therapy was initiated early (12 h after infection), when bacterial counts in aortic valve vegetations were relatively low, or late (48 h after infection), when vegetations contained a larger inoculum. Antibodies were administered as a continuous 24-h intravenous infusion. Mean steady-state levels of ciprofloxacin (64 mg/kg), pefloxacin (64 mg/kg), and fosfomycin (300 mg/kg) in serum were 2.5, 4.2, and 63.9 mg/liter, respectively. For the multidrug-susceptible strain, all regimens except pefloxacin alone significantly reduced the number of CFU per gram of vegetation versus controls, whether treatment was performed early or late. For the multidrug-resistant strain, none of the regimens showed differences from untreated controls, except ciprofloxacin-fosfomycin, which significantly reduced bacterial counts in vegetations compared with controls when therapy was begun early (4.1 +/- 1.1 log10 CFU/g of vegetation; P < 0.001 versus the control). These data suggest that combination of fosfomycin with ciprofloxacin or pefloxacin is more effective than ciprofloxacin or pefloxacin alone for the therapy of severe infections caused by multidrug-susceptible P. aeruginosa.

Investigation of synergism between combinations of ciprofloxacin, polymyxin, sulphadiazine and p-aminobenzoic acid

Subinhibitory concentrations of combinations of any two of ciprofloxacin, colistin (or polymyxin B), sodium sulphadiazine and p-aminobenzoic acid were shown by checkerboard minimum inhibitory concentration determinations to have synergistic inhibitory activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and to have either synergistic or additive activity against Staphylococcus aureus. In addition, sulphadiazine plus either ciprofloxacin or polymyxin showed markedly enhanced killing activity against both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. p-Aminobenzoic acid plus either ciprofloxacin or polymyxin also demonstrated enhanced killing activity against P. aeruginosa but these combinations were less effective in enhancing activity against S. aureus. Ciprofloxacin in combination with polymyxin had a marked synergistic effect against P. aeruginosa but only a slight synergistic effect against S. aureus. These findings indicate a potential usefulness for the synergistic combinations against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in the clinical situation; that is, they indicate an extended role for sulphonamides and support a potential role for p-aminobenzoic acid as enhancers of the activity of primary antibacterial agents such as ciprofloxacin and polymyxin. We suggest that for a second antibacterial to enhance the activity of ciprofloxacin, it may be necessary for the second antibacterial to increase cell permeability so increasing bacterial uptake of ciprofloxacin.

Synergy and antagonism of fluoroquinolones with other classes of antimicrobial agents

In an attempt to overcome some of the gaps in their antibacterial spectrum, e.g. some Gram-positive bacteria (notably streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae) and anaerobes, the fluoroquinolones have been combined with other bactericidal and bacteriostatic agents. In general, the fluoroquinolones rarely show either synergy or antagonism when used in combination with other antimicrobial agents against most bacteria. Therefore, in infections where the fluoroquinolones do not provide cover against all potential organisms, combined treatment with an appropriate agent may be considered. Current data suggest that the fluoroquinolones are not antagonistic with beta-lactams, macrolides, clindamycin and the imidazoles. Aminoglycosides in combination with the fluoroquinolones do not show synergy. Antipseudomonal penicillins, ceftazidime or imipenem in combination with the fluoroquinolones are synergistic and may be useful for treating infections in immunocompromised patients. Rifampicin in combination with a fluoroquinolone for the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis or osteomyelitis may be useful, although in vitro and in vivo results do not always coincide.

Synergy and antagonism of combinations with quinolones

Combinations of fluoroquinolones with other antimicrobial agents have been extensively investigated. Combinations of fluoroquinolones with aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, imidazoles, macrolides and clindamycin infrequently show synergy against Enterobacteriaceae and gram-positive bacteria. These combinations rarely show antagonism. Combinations of rifampin with fluoroquinolones tested against Staphylococcus aureus have been reported to show synergy and antagonism, and in vitro results have not correlated with results of animal infection experiments. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa combinations of antipseudomonas penicillins or imipenem with fluoroquinolones are synergistic for 20% to 50% of isolates in vitro and also are synergistic in animal models of infection, whereas combinations of aminoglycosides with fluoroquinolones rarely show synergy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Against anaerobic species such as Bacteroides fragilis combinations of fluoroquinolones with clindamycin, anti-anaerobic penicillins, cephalosporins or imidazoles are occasionally synergistic but usually indifferent. Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin combined with antituberculosis agents have activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and atypical mycobacteria. In general, fluoroquinolones should be combined with other agents not to achieve synergy, which is extremely variable, but to provide activity against bacteria inadequately inhibited by the fluoroquinolones.

Ciprofloxacin in combination with other antimicrobials

Combinations of ciprofloxacin with aminoglycosides or beta-lactams are infrequently synergistic and only rarely antagonistic against Enterobacteriaceae or gram-positive bacteria. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, combinations of ciprofloxacin with an aminoglycoside are synergistic for a minority of isolates, whereas rates of synergistic interactions between ciprofloxacin and beta-lactams against this group of organisms vary over a wide range.

Use of ciprofloxacin in cystic fibrosis patients

In order to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of oral ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis and trace the possible development of resistance over time, three trials were conducted. In an open-label, uncontrolled trial, 25 courses of ciprofloxacin were administered to 16 patients. Efficacy and safety were assessed based on changes in short-term clinical scores, white blood cell counts, Pseudomonas aeruginosa counts in sputum, pulmonary function tests, and standard serum chemistries and urinalysis that were performed before therapy, weekly during therapy, at the end of therapy, and at a seven-day follow-up visit after therapy. In an open-label, randomized, controlled study, the efficacy and tolerance of oral ciprofloxacin were compared with those of intravenous tobramycin and azlocillin. In another study, the rate of susceptibility of P. aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients during more than two years of clinical use was determined. In the uncontrolled trial, ciprofloxacin therapy was associated with clinical improvement in most cases with changes in short-term clinical score and forced expiratory volume in one second being statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Twenty-five patients were entered in the controlled trial with 12 patients in each treatment group being evaluable. The groups were comparable based on admitting demographic and disease characteristics, and no differences in therapeutic response or side effects were noted between the two treatments (p greater than 0.5). Bacterial susceptibility to ciprofloxacin has remained relatively stable over time. Based on these results as well as those from similar evaluations, ciprofloxacin appears to be efficacious in the treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations in adults with cystic fibrosis, producing responses similar to those observed with standard intravenous antibiotic therapy.

Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents

The fluoroquinolones, a new class of potent orally absorbed antimicrobial agents, are reviewed, considering structure, mechanisms of action and resistance, spectrum, variables affecting activity in vitro, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, emergence of resistance, and tolerability. The primary bacterial target is the enzyme deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase. Bacterial resistance occurs by chromosomal mutations altering deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase and decreasing drug permeation. The drugs are bactericidal and potent in vitro against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Haemophilus spp., and Neisseria spp., have good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococci, and (with several exceptions) are less potent against streptococci and have fair to poor activity against anaerobic species. Potency in vitro decreases in the presence of low pH, magnesium ions, or urine but is little affected by different media, increased inoculum, or serum. The effects of the drugs in combination with a beta-lactam or aminoglycoside are often additive, occasionally synergistic, and rarely antagonistic. The agents are orally absorbed, require at most twice-daily dosing, and achieve high concentrations in urine, feces, and kidney and good concentrations in lung, bone, prostate, and other tissues. The drugs are efficacious in treatment of a variety of bacterial infections, including uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections, bacterial gastroenteritis, and gonorrhea, and show promise for therapy of prostatitis, respiratory tract infections, osteomyelitis, and cutaneous infections, particularly when caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli. Fluoroquinolones have also proved to be efficacious for prophylaxis against travelers' diarrhea and infection with gram-negative bacilli in neutropenic patients. The drugs are effective in eliminating carriage of Neisseria meningitidis. Patient tolerability appears acceptable, with gastrointestinal or central nervous system toxicities occurring most commonly, but only rarely necessitating discontinuance of therapy. In 17 of 18 prospective, randomized, double-blind comparisons with another agent or placebo, fluoroquinolones were tolerated as well as or better than the comparison regimen. Bacterial resistance has been uncommonly documented but occurs, most notably with P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus and occasionally other species for which the therapeutic ratio is less favorable. Fluoroquinolones offer an efficacious, well-tolerated, and cost-effective alternative to parenteral therapies of selected infections.

Cross-resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin, extended-spectrum beta-lactams, and aminoglycosides and susceptibility to antibiotic combinations

The susceptibilities of 270 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from diverse sources (82 burn patients, 76 cystic fibrosis [CF] patients, and 112 other sources) to ciprofloxacin and three other quinolones, nine extended-spectrum beta-lactams, and three aminoglycosides were determined by an agar dilution method in cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton medium. Ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, and aztreonam were the most active. MICs for burn isolates were consistently higher than those for other isolates for most antibiotics, whereas those for CF strains were consistently lower. Multidrug resistance to aminoglycosides and beta-lactams occurred in 21% of the burn isolates, 2.6% of the CF isolates, and 8.9% of the other isolates. Ninety percent of these strains remained susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Seven percent of the isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC, greater than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml). Concurrent resistance to ciprofloxacin and beta-lactams or aminoglycosides was rare (1.8 to 4%). Analysis by Spearman rank correlation revealed a high degree of correlation of MICs among antibiotics within the same class, except for imipenem. An inoculum effect was observed for all antibiotics between 10(6) and 10(4) CFU (P less than 0.05), with those for piperacillin and cefoperazone being the most pronounced (16-fold and 8-fold differences, respectively), and was least apparent for the quinolones, aminoglycosides, imipenem, and aztreonam (twofold differences). Selected strains for which there were high MICs of ciprofloxacin (greater than or equal to 1 micrograms/ml) were tested against ciprofloxacin in combination with other agents in a checkerboard agar dilution assay. Synergistic (summated fractional inhibitory concentration, </=0.5) interactions at clinically achievable concentrations were most frequent with mezlocillin (33%), piperacillin (21%), and (7.6%), aztreonam (3.7%), and the aminoglycosides (3.7%). Antagonism (summated fractional inhibitory concentration, >/= 4) was observed in only one instance (with gentamicin).

In vitro synergy studies with ciprofloxacin and selected beta-lactam agents and aminoglycosides against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In order to determine the effect of combining ciprofloxacin with beta-lactam and aminoglycoside agents against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, ciprofloxacin was tested in vitro with the checkerboard broth microdilution technique with various current beta-lactam and aminoglycoside agents. In both inhibitory and bactericidal testing, the combination of ciprofloxacin with a beta-lactam agent (ceftazidime, piperacillin, mezlocillin, azlocillin, or imipenem) was more likely to show a synergistic effect or additive effect and lack of antagonism (96.5% of all inhibitory and cidal tests) than was a combination of ciprofloxacin with an aminoglycoside [(amikacin, tobramycin, or gentamicin), 90% of all inhibitory and cidal tests]. Finding of antagonism in some testing, especially with aminoglycosides, indicates that results are unpredictable. These results may influence selection of agents for selection in clinical situations.

Synergistic interactions of ciprofloxacin and extended-spectrum beta-lactams or aminoglycosides against multiply drug-resistant Pseudomonas maltophilia

The susceptibility of 28 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas maltophilia to 16 antimicrobial agents was determined in vitro by a standard agar dilution method with inoculum sizes of 10(4) and 10(6) CFU. All isolates exhibited multiple drug resistance. Nine isolates were selected for studies of combinations of ciprofloxacin with seven antipseudomonal beta-lactams and three aminoglycosides by a checkerboard agar dilution technique. Synergistic or additive combinations of ciprofloxacin in clinically achievable concentrations were most frequent with mezlocillin (89%), followed by cefoperazone (67%), piperacillin (56%), cefsulodin (56%), and ceftazidime (33%), and were infrequent with aztreonam (11%), the aminoglycosides (0 to 14%), or imipenem (0%). Antagonism was not observed in any combination. These data suggest that combinations of ciprofloxacin with these agents may be useful for some nosocomial multiply drug-resistant P. maltophilia infections.

Ciprofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Ciprofloxacin is one of a new generation of fluorinated quinolones structurally related to nalidixic acid. The primary mechanism of action of ciprofloxacin is inhibition of bacterial DNA gyrase. It is a broad spectrum antibacterial drug to which most Gram-negative bacteria are highly susceptible in vitro and many Gram-positive bacteria are susceptible or moderately susceptible. Unlike most broad spectrum antibacterial drugs, ciprofloxacin is effective after oral or intravenous administration. Ciprofloxacin has been most extensively studied following oral administration. It attains concentrations in most tissues and body fluids which are at least equivalent to the minimum inhibitory concentration designated as the breakpoint for bacterial susceptibility in vitro. The results of clinical trials with orally and intravenously administered ciprofloxacin have confirmed the potential for its use in a wide range of infections, which was suggested by its in vitro antibacterial and pharmacokinetic profiles. It has proven an effective treatment for many types of systemic infections as well as for both acute and chronic infections of the urinary tract. Ciprofloxacin generally appeared to be at least as effective as alternative orally administered antibacterial drugs in the indications in which they were compared, and in some indications, to parenterally administered antibacterial therapy. However, further studies are needed to fully clarify the comparative efficacy of ciprofloxacin and standard antibacterial therapies. Bacterial resistance to ciprofloxacin develops infrequently, both in vitro and clinically, except in the setting of pseudomonal respiratory tract infections in cystic fibrosis patients. The drug is also well tolerated. Thus, as an orally active, broad spectrum and potent antibacterial drug, ciprofloxacin offers a valuable alternative to broad spectrum parenterally administered antibacterial drugs for use in a wide range of clinical infections, including difficult infections due to multiresistant pathogens.

Ciprofloxacin: chemistry, mechanism of action, resistance, antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, and adverse reactions

Ciprofloxacin, considered a benchmark when comparing new fluoroquinolones, shares with these agents a common mechanism of action: inhibition of DNA gyrase. While ciprofloxacin demonstrated a fairly good activity against gram-positive bacteria, it is against gram-negative organisms that it proved to be more potent than other fluoroquinolones. It is the most active quinolone against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with MIC90s on the order of 0.5 micrograms/ml. When given orally, ciprofloxacin exhibited 70% bioavailability and attained peak serum levels ranging between 1.5 and 2.9 micrograms/ml after a single 500-mg dose. Nineteen percent of an oral dose was excreted as metabolites in both urine and feces. In most cases, body fluids and tissue concentrations equaled or exceeded those in concurrent serum samples. In clinical trials, oral and intravenous ciprofloxacin yielded similar clinical and bacteriologic results compared to standard therapy in a wide array of systemic infections, including lower and upper urinary tract infections; gonococcal urethritis; skin, skin structure, and bone infections; and respiratory tract and gastrointestinal tract infections. Major benefits with the oral form of this quinolone are expected in chronic pyelonephritis and bone infections, and in pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant microorganisms has been noted in clinical practice, primarily Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The most frequent side effects are related to the gastrointestinal tract; but attention should be given to adverse central nervous system effects.

Comparative efficacy of ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and gentamicin, given alone or in combination, in a model of experimental septicemia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae in neutropenic mice

The therapeutic efficacy of ciprofloxacin, used alone and in combination with either ceftazidime or gentamicin, was evaluated in a model of experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae septicemia in neutropenic mice. Therapeutic results were compared to those achieved by treatment with ceftazidime or gentamicin alone, as well as their combination. Infections were induced by i.v. injection of two strains of K. pneumoniae. Therapy with i.m. antibiotics was performed in 8 h intervals for a total of 13 doses, and survival rates were recorded at the end of treatment as well as seven days later. Ciprofloxacin alone proved to be significantly more effective than ceftazidime and gentamicin, producing survival rates similar to the combination of ceftazidime plus gentamicin. Bacterial counts of spleens and blood confirmed the superior bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin. Except for the combination of ciprofloxacin with ceftazidime, there was no apparent advantage of combinations of ciprofloxacin with the other agents compared to ciprofloxacin alone. These data suggest a high in vivo activity of ciprofloxacin in systemic infection due to K. pneumoniae.

Interactions of ciprofloxacin with clindamycin, metronidazole, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and mezlocillin against gram-positive and gram-negative anaerobic bacteria

A total of 598 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were tested against ciprofloxacin by the agar dilution technique with 10(5) CFU on Wilkins-Chalgren medium. Selected strains representative of the six major genera of anaerobes relatively resistant to the quinolones were tested for interactions with ciprofloxacin in combination with clindamycin, metronidazole, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, or mezlocillin by using a checkerboard agar dilution technique. Cefotaxime-ciprofloxacin and clindamycin-ciprofloxacin were the most effective combinations, with 16% of all isolates and 44% of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates responding synergistically to the former combination and 9% of all isolates and 37% of Peptostreptococcus isolates responding synergistically to the latter. Occasional synergy was seen with all other antibiotic combinations except for metronidazole-ciprofloxacin. Likewise, synergism was seen with all groups of anaerobes except for Fusobacterium species. Antagonistic interactions were observed only with a Peptostreptococcus intermedius strain tested against clindamycin-ciprofloxacin. These data suggest that combinations of ciprofloxacin with these agents may be useful for certain resistant anaerobic infections.

Ciprofloxacin

Ciprofloxacin is a new fluorinated quinolone antibiotic with high activity against a wide spectrum of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical trials using the oral preparation of ciprofloxacin have demonstrated its effectiveness in a wide variety of infections. In addition, extensive clinical trials with the intravenous preparation are underway. In vitro and in vivo studies with ciprofloxacin have reported the incidence of resistant organisms to be very low. In addition, the incidence of ciprofloxacin-related side effects throughout its clinical trials has been minimal. Most reports of side effects have been related to the gastrointestinal tract, such as nausea or vomiting. The incidence of adverse experiences in worldwide clinical trials has been reported to be approximately 6.4 percent.

Ciprofloxacin interactions with imipenem and amikacin against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In vitro interactions of ciprofloxacin with imipenem and amikacin were evaluated by the killing-curve technique against 26 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains resistant to amikacin and resistant or moderately susceptible to ciprofloxacin and imipenem. Imipenem enhanced killing by ciprofloxacin in tests with 11 strains, whereas amikacin enhanced killing in tests with only 4 strains.

Comparative in vitro activities of pefloxacin, ofloxacin, enoxacin and ciprofloxacin against 256 clinical isolates

The antibacterial activity of four new fluoroquinolone carboxylic acids, pefloxacin, ofloxacin, enoxacin and ciprofloxacin, against 256 clinical isolates was investigated by means of an agar dilution method. Generally, all quinolones tested had a high activity against Gram-negative bacteria. More than 90% of Enterobacteriaceae strains were inhibited by a quinolone concentration of 0.4 microgram/ml. Also strains usually resistant to conventional beta-lactam antibiotics, and sometimes to third-generation cephalosporins, like Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp, and Yersinia spp. were susceptible to the tested quinolones. Ciprofloxacin was 5 to 25-fold more potent on a weight basis against Enterobacteriaceae than the other quinolones. Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Haemophilus influenzae were extremely susceptible to the new quinolones. Ciprofloxacin was about 10 times more potent against Pseudomonas aeruginosa than the other quinolones, and was the only quinolone that was sufficiently active against all tested P. aeruginosa strains (MIC less than or equal to 0.4 microgram/ml). The activity against Gram-positive bacteria was considerably lower. All the quinolones investigated had an acceptable activity against many of the methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. The majority of the Streptococcus spp. tested was quinolone-resistant, and was Listeria monocytogenes. Generally, it was evident that ciprofloxacin was more potent on a weight basis than the other quinolones, but this difference was counterbalanced by a higher achievable serum concentration for ofloxacin. Some of the investigated fluoroquinolones might constitute valid therapeutical alternatives to beta-lactam antibodies and aminoglycosides in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.

Synergism of the combinations of imipenem plus ciprofloxacin and imipenem plus amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacterial pathogens

The combinations of imipenem plus ciprofloxacin and imipenem plus amikacin were investigated for their activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacterial pathogens. For imipenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa, synergy of imipenem plus ciprofloxacin and imipenem plus amikacin was observed against 36 and 45% of the strains, respectively. The incidence of synergy against imipenem-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa was 10% for both combinations. Antagonism was not observed with either combination.