Comparative antibacterial activity of a new oral cephalosporin, BMY-28100

An LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma and its application for the bioequivalence study of two cefprozil tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers

A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method was developed for the first time and validated for the determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma. The plasma samples were prepared by protein precipitation using acetonitrile. Detection was performed using an electronic spray ion source in the negative ion mode, operating in the multiple reaction monitoring of the transitions m/z 388.0 to m/z 205.0 for cefprozil diastereomers and m/z 346.1 to m/z 268.1 for cephalexin (the internal standard). The calibration curves of cis-cefprozil and trans-cefprozil were linear in the ranges 0.125-16.0 µg/mL and 0.0403-1.72 µg/mL, respectively. The lower limits of quantification of cis- and trans-cefprozil were 0.125 and 0.0403 µg/mL in human plasma, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precisions of cis- and trans-cefprozil were all <9.7%, and the accuracy ranged from 99.2 to 104.7% and from 100.6 to 102.2%, respectively. The validated method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study of two cefprozil formulations in 24 healthy Chinese volunteers. The two cefprozil tablets were bioequivalent by measurement of cis-, trans- and total cefprozil. We suggest that the bioequivalence of cefprozil formulations can be evaluated only using cis-cefprozil as the analyte in future studies.

Redefining the management of pediatric tonsillopharyngitis with cefprozil

Tonsillopharyngitis is very common in children, with Group A Streptococci being the most common bacterial etiology. Effective antibacterial treatment is imperative due to risk of rheumatic fever. Cephalosporins have been used successfully for the treatment of Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. Cefprozil is a novel broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin. Cefprozil is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract with high bioavailability. The excellent penetration of cefprozil into tonsillar and adenoidal tissue corresponds well with the clinical outcome. The drug provides excellent coverage against both gram-negative and -positive bacteria that may cause pharyngitis/tonsillitis. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil appears to exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for important gram negative pathogens. In clinical trials, cefprozil appears to be at least as effective as commonly used comparison agents such as cefaclor and cefixime. Additionally, cefprozil is better tolerated than the latter, especially with regard to gastrointestinal adverse effects. Thus cefprozil can be considered a safe and reliable drug for the treatment of Streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children.

HPLC method for simultaneous determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma

A high-performance liquid chromatography method was developed for the determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma. Cefprozil exists as cis and trans isomer at the ratio of 90:10. Plasma samples were prepared by protein precipitation using acetonitrile, trichloroacetic acid and methylene chloride. After the mixtures were vortexed and centrifuged, the aqueous supernatant was injected into a reversed-phase C8 column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile, glacial acetic acid and distilled water at the volume ratio of 5.5:1.75:92.75 (pH 2.7). The signals were monitored with UV detection at 280 nm. The calibration curves of cis and trans isomer were linear in concentration ranges of 0.1-25 and 0.02-2.5 microg/mL with the correlation coefficient of 0.9999 and 0.9989, respectively. After oral administration of cefprozil in humans, Cmax and Tmax of total cefprozil were 18.80 +/- 2.14 microg/mL and 2.06 +/- 0.62 h. This method was sensitive with excellent selectivity and reproducibility, and successfully applied to a bioavailability study of cefprozil in healthy subjects.

A review of the microbiology of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid over the 15 year period 1978-1993

A review of the published literature over the period 1978-1993 was undertaken to assess any changes in the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing bacterial pathogens and also any changes in the susceptibility in these pathogens to amoxycillin/clavulanate. The review has involved the examination of over 1500 publications. The review shows that in general there has been an increase in the frequency of beta-lactamase-producing pathogens resistant to ampicillin and amoxycillin but there is no evidence for any significant increase in resistance to amoxycillin/clavulanate over the period of the review.

Comparative microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil

In vitro studies on the activity of cefprozil have been conducted in Europe and North America. Against gram-negative bacilli, cefprozil and cefaclor are at least two to four times more active than cephalexin. Cefixime is more active against these organisms. Against gram-positive cocci, cefprozil is at least two to four times more active than cefaclor and cephalexin; cefixime has limited gram-positive activity, and is particularly inactive against staphylococci (MIC90 32 mg/l). Cefprozil is highly active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (unlike cefixime). Those strains of this genus that display intermediate resistance to pneumococci are more susceptible to cefprozil than cefaclor. Neisseria species and Moraxella catarrhalis are susceptible to cefprozil (MIC90 0.06 and 1 mg/l). beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae appear to be susceptible to cefprozil, as the reported MIC90 is 2-4 mg/l. Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and those strains of the Enterobacteriaceae that commonly possess a chromosomal cephalosporinase (e.g., Providencia, Morganella and Enterobacter) are generally considered to be resistant to cefprozil as well as to other oral cephalosporins. Cefprozil appears to display enhanced stability to the commonly encountered Tem-1 and SHV-1 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, as found in Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and the Enterobacteriaceae. Cefprozil is rapidly absorbed, reaching a maximum concentration 0.9 to 1.2 h post-dose. Following oral doses of 250 and 500 mg, the Cmax is 6.2 and 10.0 mg/l respectively. Serum half-lives are generally reported as between 1.2 and 1.4 h, and urine recovery is high, 57-70%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative studies of cefprozil in the management of skin and soft-tissue infections

Six multicenter clinical trials comparing cefprozil with cefaclor, amoxicillin-clavulanate or erythromycin in the management of skin and soft-tissue infections caused by susceptible bacteria demonstrate that cefprozil, given once or twice daily, is an effective chemotherapeutic agent in this context. Its pharmacokinetic behavior is compatible with once-daily or twice-daily administration, with a probability of improved patient compliance. Safety and tolerability compare favorably with other agents used in skin and soft-tissue infections.

Penetration of cefprozil into middle ear fluid of patients with otitis media

Penetration of cefprozil into the middle ear fluid was investigated in patients with chronic otitis media. A total of 89 patients ranging from 7 months to 11 years old participated in the study. The middle ear fluid was removed by ventilation tubes inserted through the tympanic membrane at times ranging from 0.38 to 5.97 h after oral administration of a single dose of 15 or 20 mg/kg of body weight. A blood sample was also collected as soon as the middle ear fluid was removed. Plasma samples were analyzed for the concentration of cefprozil by a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. Middle ear fluid samples were analyzed for the concentration of cefprozil by a microbiological assay. The concentrations of cefprozil in plasma ranged from 0.38 to 15.97 micrograms/ml at the 15-mg/kg dose level and from 1.28 to 21.47 micrograms/ml at the 20-mg/kg dose level. The corresponding middle ear fluid concentrations of cefprozil ranged from 0.06 to 4.44 micrograms/ml and from 0.17 to 8.67 micrograms/ml, respectively. Cefprozil penetrates well into middle ear fluid in patients with chronic otitis media.

Optimal times above MICs of ceftibuten and cefaclor in experimental intra-abdominal infections

The duration of time that serum drug levels remain above the MIC (time above the MIC) for the pathogen has been shown to be the most significant parameter determining the efficacies of beta-lactam antibiotics. In the described study, we investigated the optimal time above the MIC of ceftibuten and cefaclor using a nonneutropenic mouse model of intra-abdominal infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The abilities of the drugs to protect mice against the organisms were determined in mouse protection tests, and the doses were fractionated to produce various dosing regimens with different times above the MIC. All drug-organism combinations showed a significant correlation (r > 0.9) between drug efficacy and the time above the MIC. Also, with ceftibuten treatment, the different dosing regimens that produced equal times above the MIC resulted in the same efficacy, whereas with cefaclor, an apparent dose-dependent effect was observed. These results showed that for a 100% recovery from K. pneumoniae and E. coli infections, the optimal times above the MIC with ceftibuten treatment were 2.2 and 1.6 h, respectively. Relatively high doses of both antibiotics were required to ensure recovery from S. pneumoniae infections. In vitro time-kill studies demonstrated that cefaclor exhibits a marked inoculum effect against the pathogens, and there was a concentration-dependent killing at a large inoculum size. On the other hand, ceftibuten showed no inoculum effect. It is suggested that optimization of both dose and time above the MIC appears to be necessary for the treatment of S. aureus infections with cefaclor, and this may apply to other beta-lactams tht exhibit marked inoculum effects.

Susceptibility of United States clinical trial isolates to cefprozil and cefaclor

First bacterial isolates (n = 2022) from patients enrolled in the United States cefprozil clinical trials were tested for susceptibility to cefprozil and cefaclor. Cefprozil was two- to eightfold more active than cefaclor against Gram-positive bacteria based on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50 and MIC90) values. The differential was greatest, for the most part, for the 80% of isolates of each species with the lowest MICs. Against Gram-negative bacterial species, the two cephalosporins were very similar in activity and MIC90 values ranged from 2 to 8 micrograms/ml for the most prevalent pathogens except Enterobacter spp., which were resistant. The majority of streptococci (98%) were susceptible to < or = 0.5 microgram/ml of cefprozil, and the majority of staphylococci tested (> 90%) were susceptible to < or = 4 micrograms/ml of cefprozil. These results for isolates primarily from community-acquired infections were similar to previously reported results from uncharacterized or hospital-associated isolates.

Effects of time of administration and posture on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil

The effects of time of administration, sleep and posture on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil were evaluated in a single-dose 3-way crossover study. After a 6-hour fast, 12 healthy male volunteers received oral cefprozil 250mg at 1200h (treatment A), 1200h (treatment B) and 2400h (treatment C) with a 7-day washout interval between each treatment. During the study period, volunteers receiving treatment A remained in a sitting/standing position or were ambulatory, those receiving treatment B were in the supine position, and those receiving treatment C were sleeping. Blood samples were taken over an 8-hour period and the plasma samples were analysed for the concentrations of cefprozil by a high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method. Plasma concentration vs time data were analysed using noncompartmental analysis methods. Mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 4.51, 5.02 and 4.91 mg/L for treatments A, B and C, respectively. Corresponding mean values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) were 12.6, 12.6 and 14.2 mg/L.h, respectively. The mean half-life (t1/2) values were 1.30, 1.23 and 1.50 hours for treatments A, B and C, respectively. Mean AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and t1/2 values following treatment B were not significantly different from those of treatment A. However, the mean AUC(0-infinity) and t1/2 values of cefprozil following treatment C were significantly greater than those of either treatment A or B. The mean Cmax value following treatment C was not significantly different than that of either treatments A or B. From these results, it was concluded that posture has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Review of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and clinical efficacy of cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, microbiology, clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerance of cefprozil, a new, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin.

DATA SOURCES

Published clinical trials and microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, and safety data were identified by MEDLINE; additional references were derived from bibliographies of these articles; microbiologic data on file were provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

STUDY SELECTION

Only published comparative clinical trial reports are included in the review of clinical efficacy. Noncomparative clinical data pertaining to uses of cefprozil not approved by the Food and Drug Administration are not included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data are presented on the in vitro microbiologic activity of cefprozil against 10,152 bacterial isolates, including most of the clinically important streptococci (e.g., Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae), beta-lactamase-positive and -negative Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Clostridium difficile, and numerous other gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. In clinical trials, cefprozil appears to be at least as effective as commonly used comparison agents such as cefaclor, cefixime, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Additionally, cefprozil is better tolerated than the latter two agents, especially with regard to gastrointestinal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefprozil is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin that provides coverage against both gram-negative and -positive bacteria that may cause otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, skin and skin-structure infections, secondary bacterial infection of acute bronchitis, and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil appears to exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for some important pathogens. Cefprozil is used primarily for second-line treatment as less-expensive, first-line generic alternatives generally are available. Cefprozil demonstrates clinical advantages over many other orally administered beta-lactam antibiotics in terms of antimicrobial spectrum, a once- or twice-daily dosing regimen, and/or reduced incidence of adverse effects.

Cefprozil versus penicillin V in treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis

In a randomized multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of cefprozil were compared with those of penicillin in the treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children. Of the 409 patients enrolled, 323 were evaluable for their clinical and bacteriological responses; of these 323 children, 172 received cefprozil and 151 received penicillin V. The clinical responses in patients treated with cefprozil were significantly better than those in patients who received penicillin (95.3 versus 88.1%; P = 0.023). Eradication of the original serotype of group A streptococci was achieved in 91.3% of patients treated with cefprozil and 87.4% of patients treated with penicillin, the difference not being statistically significant (P = 0.125). However, there were significantly more symptomatic patients among the bacteriological failures in the penicillin group (68.4%) than in the cefprozil group (26.7%). beta-Lactamase-producing Staphylococcus aureus was more frequently isolated from the throat flora during penicillin therapy than during cefprozil treatment. No difference in the incidence of adverse events probably related or of unknown relationship to the study drugs was observed in the two treatment groups (5.2% of those treated with cefprozil and 6.0% of those treated with penicillin). Cefprozil can be considered a safe and reliable drug for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis in children.

Penetration of cefprozil into tonsillar and adenoidal tissues

Penetration of cefprozil into tonsillar and/or adenoidal tissues was investigated for patients undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. A total of 29 patients ranging in age from 2 to 14 years participated in the study. The tonsils and/or the adenoids were removed at times ranging from 0.33 to 3.17 h after oral administration of a dose of either 7.5 or 20 mg/kg of body weight. A blood sample was also collected as soon as the tissue sample was removed. Plasma, tonsil, and adenoid samples were analyzed for cis and trans isomers of cefprozil by high-performance liquid chromatographic assays. The concentrations of the cis isomer of cefprozil in plasma ranged from 0.60 to 9.87 micrograms/ml at the 7.5-mg/kg dose level and from 1.04 to 20.40 micrograms/ml at the 20-mg/kg dose level. The corresponding concentrations of the cis isomer in tonsil tissue ranged from 0.48 to 2.42 micrograms/g and from 1.00 to 4.29 micrograms/g, respectively. The corresponding concentrations of the cis isomer in adenoid tissue ranged from 0.40 to 4.20 micrograms/g and from 1.74 to 4.94 micrograms/g, respectively. The concentrations of the trans isomer were about 1/10 of those observed for the cis isomer. The median ratios of the cefprozil concentration in tonsillar tissue to that in plasma were 0.37 and 0.47 for patients receiving a 7.5- or a 20-mg/kg oral dose of cefprozil, respectively. The corresponding median ratios for the adenoidal tissue were 0.46 and 0.82, respectively. The cefprozil concentrations in either the tonsillar or the adenoidal tissue at both dose levels over 3.17 h after dosing are much higher than the MICs for common pathogens which cause pharyngitis or tonsillitis.

Cefprozil

Cefprozil is a new, orally bioavailable, cephalosporin with significant activity against the bacteria commonly associated with upper and lower respiratory tract infection, and skin and soft tissue infections. Its absorption and elimination dynamics suggest once- or twice-daily dosing. The low-rate of gastrointestinal and dermatologic side effects associated with cefprozil administration suggest that it may have a significant role in the management of patients with these infections. Children with pharyngitis or urinary tract infection are more appropriately treated with antibiotics having a narrower spectrum of activity. With a variety of newer cephalosporins being marketed in the early 1990s, it will be important for the clinician to examine the data from ongoing comparative clinical trials to determine which antibiotic is best for a patient with a specific infection and whether the added cost justifies its use.

Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential

Cefprozil is an orally active cephalosporin which has demonstrated activity against a wide range of organisms in vitro. It is particularly active against the Gram-positive organisms Streptococcus pyogenes, pneumoniae and agalactiae and against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus are not susceptible to cefprozil. Cefprozil is also moderately active against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, many Enterobacteriaceae and certain anaerobic organisms, and is relatively stable to hydrolysis by a number of beta-lactamases. In comparative trials, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil 500mg or 20 mg/kg administered once or twice daily has been comparable with multiple daily dosage regimens of erythromycin in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis, with cefaclor and amoxicillin/clavulanate in lower respiratory tract infections, with amoxicillin/clavulanate and erythromycin in skin and skin-structure infections and with cefaclor in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The clinical efficacy of cefprozil is similar to that of cefaclor in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis but the bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil is significantly greater than that of cefaclor. Cefprozil is clinically more effective than cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and demonstrated greater efficacy than cefaclor in one of 2 comparative studies when administered twice daily in patients with skin and skin-structure infections. In children with acute otitis media, cefprozil 15 mg/kg twice daily was as effective as cefaclor or amoxicillin/clavulanate 13.3 mg/kg 3 times daily and was as effective as cefixime 8 mg/kg once daily. The most frequently reported adverse effects associated with cefprozil, diarrhoea and nausea, are usually mild to moderate in severity and discontinuation of treatment is rarely necessary. Thus, cefprozil with its convenient administration regimen appears to be a suitable alternative to cefaclor, cefixime, amoxicillin/clavulanate or erythromycin for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and skin-structure infections, and otitis media in children. While cefprozil has shown similar efficacy to cefaclor in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, well-controlled clinical trials comparing its efficacy with that of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole) in this indication are required.

In vitro activity of cefprozil (BMY 28100) and cefepime (BMY 28142) against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Branhamella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae, and provisional interpretive criteria for disk diffusion and dilution susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae

The in vitro activities of two new cephalosporins, an oral agent, cefprozil and a parenteral compound, cefepime, were assessed against recent clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae. In general, both cefprozil and cefepime MICs were higher for beta-lactamase-producing strains of M. catarrhalis in comparison to strains that lacked beta-lactamase. By contrast, beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains of H. influenzae had similar cefprozil and cefepime minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). The MIC90 values for cefprozil were 0.12, 32, 4.0, and 0.5 micrograms/ml versus S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and beta-lactamase-positive and negative strains of M. catarrhalis, respectively. In comparison to three other oral cephalosporins included in this study, cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, and cefixime, cefprozil was the most active agent against S. pneumoniae, the least active against B. catarrhalis, and equivalent in activity to cefaclor against H. influenzae. The cefepime MIC values against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and beta-lactamase-positive and negative strains of M. catarrhalis were 0.03, 0.25, 2.0, and 0.5 micrograms/ml, respectively. Cefepime was less active than ceftriaxone for all three organism groups, however, was in all cases more active than cefixime, cefuroxime, cefaclor, and cefprozil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetic interactions of cefprozil with food, propantheline, metoclopramide, and probenecid in healthy volunteers

Cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin antibiotic, is composed of cis and trans isomers in an approximate 90:10 ratio. The objectives of this study were: (1) to assess the effects of alterations in gastrointestinal motility by metoclopramide and propantheline on the pharmacokinetics of cis and trans isomers of cefprozil, and to compare them with the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil; (2) to assess the effects of inhibition of renal tubular secretion by probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil isomers. In this four-way crossover study, 15 healthy male volunteers received a 1000-mg dose of cefprozil after fasting, pretreatment with metoclopramide or propantheline, after breakfast, or after probenecid in an incomplete, balanced block design. There was a 1-week washout period between each treatment. Blood and urine samples collected over a 24-hour period were assayed for the cis and trans isomers. The concentrations of the trans isomers were generally 1/10 of the cis isomer. The means and variances of the pharmacokinetic parameters of the cis and trans isomers of cefprozil were similar in fasting subjects and were affected in a parallel manner by food, metoclopramide, propantheline, and probenecid. The pharmacokinetics of the cis isomer under the fasting condition were as follows: maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax), 14.0 +/- 2.7 micrograms/mL; median time to reach Cmax (tmax), 1.5 (range, 1.0-3.5) hours; half-life (t1/2), 1.24 +/- 0.27 hours; area under the concentration (AUC0-infinity), 47.3 +/- 7.7 micrograms.hour/mL; mean residence time after oral administration (MRTpo), 2.9 +/- 0.4 hours; CLR, 219 +/- 60 mL/minute; and Xu% (percent cumulative urinary excretion in 0-24 hours), 68.1 +/- 12.5.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of antacid on the bioavailability of cefprozil

The effect of antacid on the bioavailability of cefprozil was investigated in a two-way crossover study. Eight healthy male subjects received a single 500-mg oral dose of cefprozil with and without coadministration of 30 ml of an antacid suspension containing magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide (Maalox). Cefprozil consists of cis and trans isomers in an approximate 90:10 ratio. When cefprozil was administered alone (treatment A), the mean maximum concentrations (Cmax) of the cis and trans isomers were 9.2 and 1.2 micrograms/ml, respectively. When cefprozil was coadministered with Maalox (treatment B), the Cmax values of the cis and trans isomers were 8.7 and 1.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The mean values of the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) were 27.7 and 3.5 micrograms.h/ml for treatment A and 27.5 and 3.5 micrograms.h/ml for treatment B for the cis and trans isomers, respectively. The other pharmacokinetic parameters, time to Cmax, elimination half-life, mean residence time, renal clearance, and percent urinary excretion, were essentially the same for the two isomers. The respective values of the elimination half-life for the cis and trans isomers were 1.36 and 1.32 h for treatment A and 1.36 and 1.42 h for treatment B. Mean urinary excretion was 63 and 60% for treatment A and 58 and 56% for treatment B for the cis and trans isomers, respectively. No significant differences between the two treatments were found for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for either isomer. For the cis isomer, bioavailability point estimates (90% confidence intervals) of the mean Cmax and AUG0-infinity values for the Maalox treatment relative to those for the reference treatment were 95% (87%, 103%) and 99% (95%, 104%), respectively. For the trans isomer, the value were 109% (92%, 126%) for Cmax and 97% (88%, 106%) for AUC0-infinity. On the basis of the results of this study, it is concluded that the bioavailability of cefprozil is not affected by the coadministration of Maalox.

Excretion of cefprozil into human breast milk

The excretion of cefprozil into breast milk in nine healthy, lactating female subjects was investigated. Each subject received a single 1,000-mg oral dose of cefprozil consisting of cis and trans isomers in an approximately 90:10 ratio. Serial blood, urine, and breast milk samples were collected and analyzed for the concentrations of the cis and trans isomers by a specific high-pressure liquid chromatography-UV assay. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters for both isomers were essentially the same. The mean peak concentrations in plasma for the cis isomer were 14.8 micrograms/ml, and the area under the concentration curve was 54.8 micrograms.h/ml. The mean values of elimination half-life, renal clearance, and urinary excretion for the cis isomer were 1.69 h, 164 ml/min, and 60%, respectively. The mean concentrations in milk of the cis isomer over a 24-h period ranged from 0.25 to 3.36 micrograms/ml, with the maximum concentration appearing at 6 h after dosing. The average maximum concentration in milk of the trans isomer was less than 0.26 micrograms/ml. The concentrations of the trans isomer in plasma and in breast milk were about 1/10 of those for the cis isomer. Less than 0.3% of the dose was excreted in breast milk for both isomers of cefprozil. Even if one assumes that the concentration of cefprozil in milk remains constant at 3.36 micrograms/ml (the highest concentration of cefprozil observed in breast milk), an infant ingesting an average of 800 ml of milk per day will be exposed to a maximum amount of about 3 mg of cefprozil per day. This value represents about 0.3% of the maternal dose. Low excretion of cefprozil in breast milk and the excellent safety profile of cefprozil suggest that this cephalosporin may be administered to nursing mothers when indicated.

Absolute bioavailability of cefprozil after oral administration in beagles

The absolute bioavailability of cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin, in four beagles was evaluated. In this two-way crossover study, each dog received a 125-mg dose of cefprozil either as an oral aqueous solution or as a 15-min intravenous infusion. A high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with UV detection was employed for the determination of cefprozil concentrations in plasma and urine. Key pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. Cefprozil was well absorbed after oral administration, and peak concentrations of 17.6 to 26.6 micrograms/ml were attained at 60 min after drug administration. The apparent elimination half-life of cefprozil was about 70 min. The renal clearance was about 60% of total body clearance and is suggestive of significant nonrenal clearance. The absolute bioavailability of cefprozil ranged from 67.1 to 79.1% in the dogs.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of cefprozil and its impact on intestinal flora of volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of cefprozil were determined with 12 volunteers (8 received cefprozil and 4 received a placebo) after oral administration of 500 mg every 12 h over an 8-day period in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Concentrations in serum and urine were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography and bioassay. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated on the basis of an open one-compartment model. The mean maximum concentration in serum on day 1 was 11.5 +/- 2.6 mg/liter, and the time to reach maximum concentration was 122.3 +/- 30 min after administration. Bioavailability parameters (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity, maximum concentration of the drug in serum, and urinary recovery) indicated an excellent absorption. No accumulation over the 8-day period was registered. Cefprozil had a short biological elimination half-life of 58 +/- 10 min and a renal clearance of 210 +/- 51 ml/min, indicating high rates of renal excretion and tubular secretion. Analysis of the fecal flora showed an ecological impact of cefprozil on the intestinal microflora, such as a moderate decrease in enterobacteria and a slight increase in enterococci, staphylococci, and bacteroides during the study. The number of all bacterial species was already normalized 4 days after the administration period. The tolerance of cefprozil proved to be excellent; only a slight and reversible increase of liver enzymes (in two volunteers), mild cephalalgia, tiredness, and soft stool were registered during the 8-day period. Cefprozil had excellent absorption, no accumulation over an 8-day period, and only a limited impact on the intestinal microflora.

Inability of cephalothin testing to predict cefprozil susceptibility

The 30-micrograms cefprozil disk and the cephalosporin class (30-micrograms cephalothin) disk were compared for their abilities to predict cefprozil susceptibility by agar disk diffusion testing. High error (5.02% major and 14.11% minor) rates were encountered with the cephalothin disk and were most frequently observed for Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis. The cefprozil disks resulted in rates of 0.05% very major, 0% major, and 3.72% minor errors. Thus, the 30-micrograms cefprozil disk is more desirable for predicting cefprozil susceptibility.

Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor for treatment of acute urinary tract infections in women

A total of 108 college women with acute urinary tract infections were treated for 10 days with either 500 mg of cefprozil (BMY-28100-03-800) once a day (n = 72) or 250 mg of cefaclor three times a day (n = 36). Clinical and bacterial cure rates at 1 week posttherapy were 94 and 93%, respectively, for the cefprozil group and 94 and 94%, respectively, for the cefaclor group (P, not significant). Both cefprozil and cefaclor were safe and effective.

Simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of cefprozil diastereomers in a pharmacokinetic study

Cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin, consists of a 90:10 cis:trans isomer mixture. Sensitive, specific and reproducible high performance liquid chromatographic methods have been developed for the simultaneous quantification of the two stereoisomers of cefprozil in plasma and urine samples from human and rats. Cephalexin acted as the internal standard. Plasma protein was precipitated with acetonitrile and trichloracetic acid with subsequent extraction of acetonitrile. After vortexing and centrifuging, the aqueous phase was injected onto a reverse phase C8 column. Urine samples were acidified with sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.8) and then directly injected onto a reverse phase C18 column. The detector was set at 280 nm. These methods were applied to determine protein binding of both isomers in human and rat sera, and to perform a pharmacokinetic study in human. Results showed that both isomers bound moderately to serum proteins with no interference by the other isomer. The pharmacokinetic study in human indicated that cefprozil was well absorbed and the cis and trans isomers have similar pharmacokinetics.

Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil (BMY-28100) and cefaclor in the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis

Cefprozil (BMY-28100) is a semisynthetic cephalosporin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and prolonged serum elimination half-life allowing for once-a-day oral administration. In vitro, cefprozil demonstrates excellent activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefprozil (500 mg once daily) was compared to cefaclor (250 mg three times daily) in an open, randomized, comparative trial for the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study; 53 patients were evaluable for clinical and bacteriological response assessment. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for safety assessment. Three patients (all in the cefprozil treatment group) required disenrollment because of side effects, mainly nausea. Clinical and bacteriological responses were comparable for both study drugs. Leukopenia and nausea, the most common side effects observed, were more common in the cefprozil-treated group. Cefprozil appears to be an appropriate alternative to cefaclor for the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. However, because of the small number of patients eligible for efficacy assessment, a large type II (beta) error was expected in our study, which may have resulted in a potential failure to detect a difference between both treatment groups. A larger study would be required to determine the proper role of cefprozil in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections.

Pharmacokinetics of cefprozil in healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment

The pharmacokinetics of cefprozil were studied in 12 (9 men, 3 women) subjects with hepatic impairment and in 12 healthy subjects who were matched for age, sex, and weight. Each subject received a single 1000 mg oral dose of cefprozil, which consists of cis and trans isomers in approximately a 90:10 ratio. Serial blood and urine samples were collected and analyzed using validated HPLC/UV methods for the concentration of each isomer. The results of the plasma and urine analyses were subjected to noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. The values for the peak plasma concentrations (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC0-infinity), apparent total body clearance (Clt/F), renal clearance (Clr), and percent of drug excreted in urine (%UR) of each isomer were not significantly different in healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment. The only parameters that were significantly (P less than or equal to .05) longer in patients with hepatic impairment were mean residence time in the body (MRT) and half-life; the MRT for the cis isomer in healthy subjects and subjects with hepatic impairment were 3.33 hr and 3.88 hr, respectively, and for the trans isomer 3.17 hr and 3.68 hr; the half-life for the cis isomer was 1.62 hr and 2.22 hr, respectively, and for the trans isomer 1.21 hr and 1.54 hr. The pharmacokinetics of the cis and trans isomers of cefprozil were virtually identical in healthy subjects as well as those with hepatic impairment.

Phase I study of multiple-dose cefprozil and comparison with cefaclor

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and tolerance of cefprozil, to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefprozil after administration of multiple doses of the drug, and to compare these pharmacokinetic parameters with those obtained with cefaclor. The volunteers received 28 doses of 250, 500, or 1,000 mg of cefprozil or 500 mg of cefaclor every 8 h for 10 days. Serial blood samples and the total volume of urine voided by each individual were collected for pharmacokinetic evaluation on days 1, 5, and 10. Both cephalosporins were well tolerated after multiple oral dosing. The peak levels in plasma (Cmax) of cefprozil ranged from 5.7 to 18.3 micrograms/ml after oral administration of 250- to 1,000-mg doses. The regression analysis of Cmax on cefprozil dose showed a dose-linear response. The mean Cmax of cefaclor ranged from 15.2 to 16.7 micrograms/ml and did not change significantly on multiple dosing. The overall mean terminal half-life of cefprozil was 1.2 h and was invariant with respect to dose or duration of dosing. The area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of cefprozil increased in a dose-proportional manner with an increase in dose. The overall urinary recovery (61% of dose) and renal clearance values of cefprozil were generally invariant with respect to dose and duration of dosing. While cefprozil was apparently absorbed less rapidly and achieved lower Cmax values than cefaclor, the AUC0-infinity of cefprozil was nearly twofold greater than that of cefaclor. The half-life of cefprozil was also twofold longer than that observed for cefaclor. Although the urinary recovery of cefaclor (75% of dose) was significantly higher than that of cefprozil (61% of dose), the concentrations of cefprozil in urine remained significantly higher than those of cefaclor from 2 to 8 h postdosing. If the therapeutic concept is maintained that levels of beta-lactam antibiotics in plasma should exceed the MIC for the offending organisms over a period that approximates the dosing interval, then cefprozil would appear to be suitable for twice-daily administration, whereas cefaclor should probably be administered three or even four times a day.

Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration

The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration, as judged by skin blister fluid, of cefprozil and cefaclor were examined in 12 healthy male volunteers. Doses of 250 and 500 mg of each drug were given to fasting subjects in a crossover fashion. Serially obtained plasma, skin blister fluid, and urine samples were analyzed for cefprozil or cefaclor by validated high-pressure liquid chromatographic methods. After oral administration of 250 and 500 mg of cefprozil, mean concentrations in plasma rose to peak levels (Cmax) of 6.1 and 11.2 micrograms/ml, respectively, and those of cefaclor were 10.6 and 17.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The elimination half-life of cefprozil (1.3 h) was significantly longer than that of cefaclor (0.6 h), and as a result, the area under the curve for cefprozil was about two times greater than that for cefaclor. Both cephalosporins were primarily excreted unchanged in urine. The mean skin blister Cmax values were 3.0 and 5.8 micrograms/ml for cefprozil and 3.6 and 6.5 micrograms/ml for cefaclor after the 250- and 500-mg oral doses, respectively. The mean Cmax values in skin blister fluid for both cephalosporins were comparable and were significantly lower than the corresponding Cmax values in plasma. However, the levels of cefprozil and cefaclor in skin blister fluid declined more slowly than they did in plasma. The skin blister fluid half-life estimates for cefprozil were significantly longer than they were for cefaclor. Parallel to the observation in plasma, the mean skin blister fluid areas under the curve for cefprozil were significantly higher than they were for cefaclor. The plasma and skin blister fluid pharmacokinetic analyses suggest that the exposure of humans to cefprozil is significantly greater than that to cefaclor at the same dose.

Phase I study of single-dose BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin

The objective of this Phase I study was to evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of BMY-28100 in 36 male subjects after the administration of single oral doses of 250, 500, and 1,000 mg. The subjects were divided into groups of 12 per dose group. All subjects completed the study, and BMY-28100 was well tolerated at all doses. The maximum concentration of the drug in plasma ranged from 6.2 to 17.7 micrograms/ml for the 250- and 1,000-mg doses, respectively, and the area under the curve increased in a dose-proportional manner. The elimination half-life and renal clearance averages were 1.2 h and 200 ml/min, respectively. The values for renal clearance suggest that BMY-28100 is excreted by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion. Mean concentrations of the drug in urine were highest during the first 4 h after the doses and ranged from 175 to 658 micrograms/ml following the 250- and 1,000-mg doses, respectively. The mean urinary recovery ranged from 57 to 70% of the dose. The results from this Phase I study indicate that BMY-28100 is well tolerated and exhibits linear pharmacokinetics.

Ceftibuten (7432-S, SCH 39720): comparative antimicrobial activity against 4735 clinical isolates, beta-lactamase stability and broth microdilution quality control guidelines

The antimicrobial activity of ceftibuten, a new oral cephalosporin, was evaluated using 4735 clinical bacterial isolates processed at four medical centers. Ceftibuten inhibited nearly 92% of all Enterobacteriaceae (less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml), thereby being markedly superior to cefixime which inhibited 78.7% at less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml and cefuroxime which inhibited 45.1% at less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml. Pseudomonads and staphylococci were not within the spectrum of activity of ceftibuten. Ceftibuten was found to be very stable in the presence of five commonly occurring beta-lactamases of both the chromosomal-mediated (P99, K1) and plasmid-mediated (CARB-2, OXA-1, TEM-1) types. Only Type Ia (P99) beta-lactamase was significantly inhibited by ceftibuten. On the basis of results of a ceftibuten MIC quality control study conducted in five laboratories, a quality control range of 0.12 to 0.5 microgram/ml is recommended for the Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strain.

BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin: antimicrobial activity against nearly 7,000 recent clinical isolates, comparative potency with other oral agents, and activity against beta-lactamase producing isolates

The antimicrobial activity of BMY-28100 was tested against approximately 7,000 bacterial pathogens in a multicenter, multiphased collaborative investigation. The BMY-28100 spectrum and antimicrobial potency was most similar to that of cefaclor and superior to that of cephalexin among currently available cephalosporins. Species that had greater than or equal to 90% of clinical strains inhibited by BMY-28100 (less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml) were: Citrobacter diversus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus mirabilis, Salmonella spp., Branhamella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus supp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. bovis, serogroup C and G streptococci, Listeria monocytogenes and gm-positive anaerobes. BMY-28100 inhibited 9% more of the 6286 fresh clinical isolates at less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml than cefaclor at the same concentration. BMY-28100 was generally bactericidal, but MICs for some species were markedly increased when an inoculum concentration of 10(7) CFU/ml was used. Strains producing plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases (TEM, OXA, SHV, HMS) were susceptible to BMY-28100, cefaclor, and cefuroxime. BMY-28100 was less active against strains producing chromosomal-mediated beta-lactamases (Types I and IV). BMY-28100 was not hydrolyzed significantly by the tested plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, but was destroyed by Type I cephalosporinases and Klebsiella K1 enzymes.

Disk diffusion susceptibility testing and broth microdilution quality control guidelines for BMY-28100, a new orally administered cephalosporin

The BMY-28100 30-micrograms-disk test was evaluated by using 615 clinical isolates. Regression analyses and error rates were determined, leading to the recommendation of greater than or equal to 18-mm zone diameters (MIC correlate, greater than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml) for susceptibility and less than or equal to 14-mm zone diameters (MIC correlate, greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml) for resistance. Nearly all false-susceptible disk test results were among the Providencia spp. and the beta-lactamase-positive Haemophilus influenzae strains. Susceptibility disk test results for these species should be interpreted with caution. The following broth microdilution MIC quality control guidelines were determined from results of a multilaboratory trial: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, 1.0 to 4.0 micrograms/ml; Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, 4.0 to 16 micrograms/ml; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, 0.25 to 1.0 microgram/ml; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, greater than 32 micrograms/ml.

World-wide development of antibiotic resistance in pneumococci

Antibiotic-resistant pneumococci, especially penicillin-resistant strains, are being increasingly isolated. Pneumococci with intermediate penicillin-resistance (MIC 0.1-1.0 micrograms/ml) have been reported from many parts of the world over the past two decades, and highly resistant strains (penicillin MICs greater than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml) have also appeared. Infection may be acquired in the hospital or community, and nosocomial outbreaks may occur which require control measures to limit organism spread. Most infections occur in children with diminished host responses. Disease caused by pneumococci with intermediate penicillin-resistance may be treated with high doses of penicillin, but disease caused by highly resistant strains, especially meningitis, may require alternative therapy. Pneumococci resistant to sulfonamides, tetracyclines, erythromycin, lincomycin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, aminoglycosides and rifampin have also appeared. Strains resistant to all the above-mentioned agents, including all beta-lactam antibiotics tested, have been reported from South Africa and Spain. Alternative therapy for resistant strains may include vancomycin, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftriaxone and imipenem. Pneumococci isolated from sites suggestive of infection, especially blood and cerebrospinal fluid, should be routinely tested for penicillin-susceptibility.