Pharmacokinetics of cefprozil in infants and children

Developmental Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics Used in Neonatal ICU: Focus on Preterm Infants

Neonatal Infections are among the most common reasons for admission to the intensive care unit. Neonatal sepsis (NS) significantly contributes to mortality rates. Empiric antibiotic therapy of NS recommended by current international guidelines includes benzylpenicillin, ampicillin/amoxicillin, and aminoglycosides (gentamicin). The rise of antibacterial resistance precipitates the growth of the use of antibiotics of the Watch (second, third, and fourth generations of cephalosporines, carbapenems, macrolides, glycopeptides, rifamycins, fluoroquinolones) and Reserve groups (fifth generation of cephalosporines, oxazolidinones, lipoglycopeptides, fosfomycin), which are associated with a less clinical experience and higher risks of toxic reactions. A proper dosing regimen is essential for effective and safe antibiotic therapy, but its choice in neonates is complicated with high variability in the maturation of organ systems affecting drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Changes in antibiotic pharmacokinetic parameters result in altered efficacy and safety. Population pharmacokinetics can help to prognosis outcomes of antibiotic therapy, but it should be considered that the neonatal population is heterogeneous, and this heterogeneity is mainly determined by gestational and postnatal age. Preterm neonates are common in clinical practice, and due to the different physiology compared to the full terms, constitute a specific neonatal subpopulation. The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence about the developmental changes (specific for preterm and full-term infants, separately) of pharmacokinetic parameters of antibiotics used in neonatal intensive care units.

An LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma and its application for the bioequivalence study of two cefprozil tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers

A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method was developed for the first time and validated for the determination of cefprozil diastereomers in human plasma. The plasma samples were prepared by protein precipitation using acetonitrile. Detection was performed using an electronic spray ion source in the negative ion mode, operating in the multiple reaction monitoring of the transitions m/z 388.0 to m/z 205.0 for cefprozil diastereomers and m/z 346.1 to m/z 268.1 for cephalexin (the internal standard). The calibration curves of cis-cefprozil and trans-cefprozil were linear in the ranges 0.125-16.0 µg/mL and 0.0403-1.72 µg/mL, respectively. The lower limits of quantification of cis- and trans-cefprozil were 0.125 and 0.0403 µg/mL in human plasma, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precisions of cis- and trans-cefprozil were all <9.7%, and the accuracy ranged from 99.2 to 104.7% and from 100.6 to 102.2%, respectively. The validated method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study of two cefprozil formulations in 24 healthy Chinese volunteers. The two cefprozil tablets were bioequivalent by measurement of cis-, trans- and total cefprozil. We suggest that the bioequivalence of cefprozil formulations can be evaluated only using cis-cefprozil as the analyte in future studies.

Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to determine the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) measure and magnitude most strongly related to cefprozil activity against Haemophilus influenzae. Using 3 clinical isolates of H. influenzae, a series of dose-fractionation studies were conducted, simulating cefprozil pediatric pharmacokinetics. The studies were designed to deliver a range of free cefprozil AUC(24) given once daily, twice daily, and by continuous infusion (CI). Drug effect, characterized by computing the log(10) ratio of the area under the 24-h bacterial colony-forming unit (CFU) (AUC(CFU)) curve to drug-free control, was fit to a Hill-type model for 3 PK-PD measures of activity: AUC(24)/MIC, C(max)/MIC, and %T > MIC. Once daily regimens provided much less activity than twice daily or CI regimens. AUC(24)/MIC and %T > MIC characterized the data well, whereas C(max)/MIC did not. Based on the PK-PD model results, for cefprozil twice daily, 50% and 80% of maximum drug effect (E(max)) was achieved at a %T > MIC of approximately 52% and 75%, respectively. A 2-log(10) reduction in log(10) ratio would require free drug %T > MIC of 58% or AUC(24)/MIC of 86. Bacteriostasis was achieved at a %T > MIC and an AUC(24)/MIC of approximately 25% and 30%, respectively. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was able to characterize the PK-PD of cefprozil against H. influenzae. Consistent with limited clinical data, a minimum %T > MIC of 40% to 50% would be suggested to achieve in vivo activity in otitis media, with maximal activity at approximately 70%T > MIC.

Pharmacodynamic assessment of cefprozil against Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for breakpoint determinations

Cefprozil, an oral semisynthetic cephalosporin, is commonly utilized in the treatment of respiratory-tract infections in children. While this agent has provided acceptable clinical success over a number of years, this study was undertaken to better define its pharmacodynamic profile against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nineteen clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae were utilized in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model. To simulate the pharmacokinetic profile of cefprozil in children, the renal function of mice was impaired with uranyl nitrate, and a commercially available cefprozil suspension (6 mg/kg of body weight) was administered orally every 12 h. Mice were infected with 10(6) to 10(7) CFU per thigh, and therapy was initiated 2 h later. At 0 and 24 h postinfection, thighs were harvested to determine bacterial density. Survival was assessed during 96 h of therapy. The magnitude of bacterial kill ranged from 0.5 to 4.4 log(10) CFU per thigh over 24 h, and the extent of microbial eradication was dependent on the MIC. Killing of more than 2.6 log(10) CFU per thigh was observed with MICs of < or =3 microg/ml, while either minimal killing or growth was detected with MICs of > or =4 microg/ml. Mortality in untreated control animals was 100%. Animals infected with strains for which the MICs were < or =2 microg/ml survived the infection, whereas MICs exceeding 2 microg/ml resulted in substantial mortality. These studies demonstrate the effectiveness of cefprozil against isolates of the pneumococcus for which the MICs are < or =2 microg/ml using a drug exposure typically observed in children. These data support a susceptibility breakpoint of < or =2 microg/ml for cefprozil.

In vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of oral beta-lactam antibiotics against Streptococcus pneumoniae from southeast Missouri

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of reduced susceptibility to penicillin, and to compare the in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of oral beta-lactam antibiotics against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from southeast Missouri.

SETTING

Cape Girardeau, Missouri (population 35,500). Interventions. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefprozil, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, cefaclor, and loracarbef by E test for 108 isolates of S. pneumoniae. The MIC50, MIC90, and percentage susceptibility were calculated for each agent. Pharmacokinetic variables were obtained from the literature, and serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for a 25-kg child taking pediatric dosages commonly administered to treat otitis media. The average time above MIC (T > MIC) was calculated as percentage of the dosing interval using free concentrations and the MIC for each individual isolate. Analysis of variance (Scheffe post hoc test) was used to determine differences among agents for in vitro activity and T > MIC (level of significance, p<0.05).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The frequency of penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae was 28.7% (31/108). For 25 penicillin-intermediate isolates, amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were significantly more active than cefprozil, cefaclor, and loracarbef. The T > MIC for amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, simulated at 13.3 mg/kg every 8 hours, was significantly longer than that for all other beta-lactams.

CONCLUSION

Amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid have superior in vitro activity and longer T > MIC for penicillin-intermediate isolates than the other oral beta-lactams.

Antibiotics in the management of pediatric skin disease

An increasingly large number of antibiotics are available for the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in children. Primary factors in the choice among these agents are the antibiotic resistance profile of the target pathogen(s), and the antibiotic's spectrum of activity, pharmacologic properties, potential adverse reactions and interactions and propensity to select for the emergence of resistant organisms. Based on a consideration of these principles, this article provides a practical guide to the use of antibiotics in the management of common cutaneous infections in the pediatric population.

Comparison of cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, loracarbef, cefixime, and ceftibuten

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the pharmacokinetics, spectrum of activity, clinical trials, and adverse effects of cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, loracarbef, cefixime, and ceftibuten, an investigational cephalosporin.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search from 1986 to January 1995.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled studies were selected for evaluation; however, uncontrolled studies were included when data were limited for indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were evaluated with respect to in vitro activity, study design, clinical and microbiologic outcomes, and adverse drug reactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, loracarbef, cefixime, and cefributen are active in vitro against organisms frequently involved in community-acquired infections such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, beta-lactamase-positive or -negative Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Except for cefixime and ceflibuten, they all are active against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Even though there were problems in study design (discussed within the text), clinical data demonstrate that these new oral beta-lactam compounds are as efficacious as conventional therapies for a variety of community-acquired infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefprozil, cefpodoxime, cefixime, loracarbef, and ceftibuten demonstrate in vitro activity against the major organisms that cause community-acquired infections. Clinical trials confirm that these agents are as effective as traditional therapies for the management of acute otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, sinusitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and skin and skin-structure infections. In addition, cefixime and cefpodoxime are effective therapies for uncomplicated gonococcal infections. Selection of a specific agent will be influenced by susceptibility data and safety, as well as issues of compliance and cost.

Comparative microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil

In vitro studies on the activity of cefprozil have been conducted in Europe and North America. Against gram-negative bacilli, cefprozil and cefaclor are at least two to four times more active than cephalexin. Cefixime is more active against these organisms. Against gram-positive cocci, cefprozil is at least two to four times more active than cefaclor and cephalexin; cefixime has limited gram-positive activity, and is particularly inactive against staphylococci (MIC90 32 mg/l). Cefprozil is highly active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (unlike cefixime). Those strains of this genus that display intermediate resistance to pneumococci are more susceptible to cefprozil than cefaclor. Neisseria species and Moraxella catarrhalis are susceptible to cefprozil (MIC90 0.06 and 1 mg/l). beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae appear to be susceptible to cefprozil, as the reported MIC90 is 2-4 mg/l. Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and those strains of the Enterobacteriaceae that commonly possess a chromosomal cephalosporinase (e.g., Providencia, Morganella and Enterobacter) are generally considered to be resistant to cefprozil as well as to other oral cephalosporins. Cefprozil appears to display enhanced stability to the commonly encountered Tem-1 and SHV-1 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, as found in Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and the Enterobacteriaceae. Cefprozil is rapidly absorbed, reaching a maximum concentration 0.9 to 1.2 h post-dose. Following oral doses of 250 and 500 mg, the Cmax is 6.2 and 10.0 mg/l respectively. Serum half-lives are generally reported as between 1.2 and 1.4 h, and urine recovery is high, 57-70%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Review of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and clinical efficacy of cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, microbiology, clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerance of cefprozil, a new, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin.

DATA SOURCES

Published clinical trials and microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, and safety data were identified by MEDLINE; additional references were derived from bibliographies of these articles; microbiologic data on file were provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

STUDY SELECTION

Only published comparative clinical trial reports are included in the review of clinical efficacy. Noncomparative clinical data pertaining to uses of cefprozil not approved by the Food and Drug Administration are not included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data are presented on the in vitro microbiologic activity of cefprozil against 10,152 bacterial isolates, including most of the clinically important streptococci (e.g., Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae), beta-lactamase-positive and -negative Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Clostridium difficile, and numerous other gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. In clinical trials, cefprozil appears to be at least as effective as commonly used comparison agents such as cefaclor, cefixime, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Additionally, cefprozil is better tolerated than the latter two agents, especially with regard to gastrointestinal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefprozil is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin that provides coverage against both gram-negative and -positive bacteria that may cause otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, skin and skin-structure infections, secondary bacterial infection of acute bronchitis, and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil appears to exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for some important pathogens. Cefprozil is used primarily for second-line treatment as less-expensive, first-line generic alternatives generally are available. Cefprozil demonstrates clinical advantages over many other orally administered beta-lactam antibiotics in terms of antimicrobial spectrum, a once- or twice-daily dosing regimen, and/or reduced incidence of adverse effects.

Cefprozil

Cefprozil is a new, orally bioavailable, cephalosporin with significant activity against the bacteria commonly associated with upper and lower respiratory tract infection, and skin and soft tissue infections. Its absorption and elimination dynamics suggest once- or twice-daily dosing. The low-rate of gastrointestinal and dermatologic side effects associated with cefprozil administration suggest that it may have a significant role in the management of patients with these infections. Children with pharyngitis or urinary tract infection are more appropriately treated with antibiotics having a narrower spectrum of activity. With a variety of newer cephalosporins being marketed in the early 1990s, it will be important for the clinician to examine the data from ongoing comparative clinical trials to determine which antibiotic is best for a patient with a specific infection and whether the added cost justifies its use.

Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential

Cefprozil is an orally active cephalosporin which has demonstrated activity against a wide range of organisms in vitro. It is particularly active against the Gram-positive organisms Streptococcus pyogenes, pneumoniae and agalactiae and against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus are not susceptible to cefprozil. Cefprozil is also moderately active against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, many Enterobacteriaceae and certain anaerobic organisms, and is relatively stable to hydrolysis by a number of beta-lactamases. In comparative trials, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil 500mg or 20 mg/kg administered once or twice daily has been comparable with multiple daily dosage regimens of erythromycin in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis, with cefaclor and amoxicillin/clavulanate in lower respiratory tract infections, with amoxicillin/clavulanate and erythromycin in skin and skin-structure infections and with cefaclor in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The clinical efficacy of cefprozil is similar to that of cefaclor in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis but the bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil is significantly greater than that of cefaclor. Cefprozil is clinically more effective than cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and demonstrated greater efficacy than cefaclor in one of 2 comparative studies when administered twice daily in patients with skin and skin-structure infections. In children with acute otitis media, cefprozil 15 mg/kg twice daily was as effective as cefaclor or amoxicillin/clavulanate 13.3 mg/kg 3 times daily and was as effective as cefixime 8 mg/kg once daily. The most frequently reported adverse effects associated with cefprozil, diarrhoea and nausea, are usually mild to moderate in severity and discontinuation of treatment is rarely necessary. Thus, cefprozil with its convenient administration regimen appears to be a suitable alternative to cefaclor, cefixime, amoxicillin/clavulanate or erythromycin for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and skin-structure infections, and otitis media in children. While cefprozil has shown similar efficacy to cefaclor in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, well-controlled clinical trials comparing its efficacy with that of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole) in this indication are required.

Oral absolute bioavailability and intravenous dose-proportionality of cefprozil in humans

The absolute bioavailability (F) and dose proportionality of cefprozil were investigated in a parallel design study with an embedded two-way crossover leg. Twenty-four healthy male subjects divided into 3 dosing groups received a single 250-, 500-, or 1000-mg dose of cefprozil by a 30-minute intravenous infusion. Subjects assigned to the 500-mg dose group also received a 500-mg oral dose of cefprozil in crossover manner with a wash-out period of 7 days between each treatment. Cefprozil consists of cis and trans isomers in an approximate 90:10 ratio. Serial blood and urine samples were collected and analyzed for the concentrations of the cis and trans isomers of the cephalosporin using high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay with UV detection methods. After the 250-, 500-, and 1000-mg intravenous administration of cefprozil, the peak concentrations were 13.2, 26.0, and 48.5 micrograms/mL, and area under the plasma concentration versus time profiles were 17.2, 31.4, and 58.1 micrograms.hour/mL, respectively, for the cis isomer increasing in a dose proportional manner. Total body clearance, renal clearance, and volume of distribution at steady state, adjusted for body weight, were not significantly different among all groups. Mean residence time, elimination half-life, and urinary recovery were invariant with the dose. Based on the plasma and urine data, the estimates of F were 89% and 94% for the cis isomer, respectively. The plasma concentrations of the trans isomer were about 1/10th of the cis isomer, and all parameters were similar to those observed for the cis isomer. In summary, cefprozil exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and is essentially completely absorbed after oral administration.