In vitro activities of ramoplanin and four glycopeptide antibiotics against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile

Clostridioides difficile infection: history, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, clinical manifestations, treatment, and future options

SUMMARYClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the major issues in nosocomial infections. This bacterium is constantly evolving and poses complex challenges for clinicians, often encountered in real-life scenarios. In the face of CDI, we are increasingly equipped with new therapeutic strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies and live biotherapeutic products, which need to be thoroughly understood to fully harness their benefits. Moreover, interesting options are currently under study for the future, including bacteriophages, vaccines, and antibiotic inhibitors. Surveillance and prevention strategies continue to play a pivotal role in limiting the spread of the infection. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of epidemiological aspects, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic tools, and current and future prophylactic and therapeutic options for C. difficile infection.

Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection

The current picture of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is alarming with a mortality rate ranging between 3% and 15% and a CDI recurrence rate ranging from 12% to 40%. Despite the great efforts made over the past 10 years to face the CDI burden, there are still gray areas in our knowledge on CDI management. The traditional anti-CDI antimicrobials are not always adequate in addressing the current needs in CDI management. The aim of our review is to give an update on novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CDI, considering the currently available evidences on their efficacy, safety, molecular mechanism of action, and their probability to be successfully introduced into the clinical practice in the near future. We identified, through a PubMed search, 16 novel antimicrobial molecules under study for CDI treatment: cadazolid, surotomycin, ridinilazole, LFF571, ramoplanin, CRS3123, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide, rifampin, rifaximin, tigecycline, auranofin, NVB302, thuricin CD, lacticin 3147, and acyldepsipeptide antimicrobials. In comparison with the traditional anti-CDI antimicrobial treatment, some of the novel antimicrobials reviewed in this study offer several advantages, i.e., the favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, the narrow-spectrum activity against CD that implicates a low impact on the gut microbiota composition, the inhibitory activity on CD sporulation and toxins production. Among these novel antimicrobials, the most active compounds in reducing spore production are cadazolid, ridinilazole, CRS3123, ramoplanin and, potentially, the acyldepsipeptide antimicrobials. These antimicrobials may potentially reduce CD environment spread and persistence, thus reducing CDI healthcare-associated acquisition. However, some of them, i.e., surotomycin, fusidic acid, etc., will not be available due to lack of superiority versus standard of treatment. The most CD narrow-spectrum novel antimicrobials that allow to preserve microbiota integrity are cadazolid, ridinilazole, auranofin, and thuricin CD. In conclusion, the novel antimicrobial molecules under development for CDI have promising key features and advancements in comparison to the traditional anti-CDI antimicrobials. In the near future, some of these new molecules might be effective alternatives to fight CDI.

A Review of Experimental and Off-Label Therapies for Clostridium difficile Infection

In spite of increased awareness and the efforts taken to optimize Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) management, with the limited number of currently available antibiotics for C. difficile the halt of this increasing epidemic remains out of reach. There are, however, close to 80 alternative treatment methods with controversial anti-clostridial efficacy or in experimental phase today. Indeed, some of these therapies are expected to become acknowledged members of the recommended anti-CDI arsenal within the next few years. None of these alternative treatment methods can respond in itself to all the major challenges of CDI management, which are primary prophylaxis in the susceptible population, clinical cure of severe cases, prevention of recurrences, and forestallment of asymptomatic C. difficile carriage and in-hospital spread. Yet, the greater the variety of treatment choices on hand, the better combination strategies can be developed to reach these goals in the future. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of these experimental and currently off-label therapeutic options.

Novel antibiotics in development to treat Clostridium difficile infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) remain a challenge to treat clinically due primarily to limited number of antibiotics available and unacceptably high recurrence rates. Because of this, there has been significant demand for creating innovative therapeutics, which has resulted in the development of several novel antibiotics.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review updates seven different antibiotics that are currently in development to treat CDI including fidaxomicin, surotomycin, ridinilazole, ramoplanin, cadazolid, LFF571, and CRS3123. Available preclinical and clinical data are compared between these antibiotics.

SUMMARY

Many of these new antibiotics display almost ideal properties for antibiotics directed against CDI. Despite these properties, not all clinical development of these compounds has been successful. These studies have provided key insights into the pathogenesis of CDI and will continue to inform future drug development. Successful phase III clinical trials should result in several new and novel antibiotics to treat CDI.

Generation of ramoplanin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Ramoplanin is a lipoglycodepsipeptide antimicrobial active against clinically important Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. To proactively examine ramoplanin resistance, we subjected S. aureus NCTC 8325-4 to serial passage in the presence of increasing concentrations of ramoplanin, generating the markedly resistant strain RRSA16. Susceptibility testing of RRSA16 revealed the unanticipated acquisition of cross-resistance to vancomycin and nisin. RRSA16 displayed phenotypes, including a thickened cell wall and reduced susceptibility to Triton X-100-induced autolysis, which are associated with vancomycin intermediate-resistant S. aureus strains. Passage of RRSA16 for 18 days in a drug-free medium yielded strain R16-18d with restored antibiotic susceptibility. The RRSA16 isolate may be used to identify the genetic and biochemical basis for ramoplanin resistance and to further our understanding of the evolution of antibiotic cross-resistance mechanisms in S. aureus.

New agents for Clostridium difficile-associated disease

BACKGROUND

Clostridia-derived diseases, in particular C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD), have been increasing in incidence, severity, and morbidity. The mainstay of treatment options has relied upon metronidazole and vancomycin, but these treatments routinely result in high relapse rates (20%) and, in the case of metronidazole, decreasing efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate and compare the current clinical and preclinical therapies of CDAD.

METHODS

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

The new antibiotics in development and preclinical development reflect next-generation versions of older drugs or two new mechanism-of-action class drugs (OPT-80, REP3123). Based on the current preclinical and clinical data, the next-generation drugs impart only a subtle difference from the intrinsic weaknesses of their genre. In contrast, OPT-80 and REP3123 seem to be differentiated.

The management of Clostridium difficile infection

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile is the commonest cause of nosocomial diarrhoea. The epidemiology and clinical phenotype of the disease has dramatically changed with the global emergence of a virulent strain of C. difficile.

SOURCE

This review was compiled using data from individual studies and review articles identified from PubMed. The retrieved articles were also examined for additional references.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Appropriate and timely infection control measures are required to control C. difficile infection (CDI) in the hospital environment, and either oral metronidazole or vancomycin remains the mainstay of treatment depending on the severity of infection.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The optimal method for diagnosing CDI remains unclear, as does the best therapeutic strategy for the management of multiple relapses. GROWING POINTS/AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Studies of new antimicrobial agents with activity against C. difficile are required to improve the management of multiply relapsing disease. The use of novel therapeutic approaches that do not require antimicrobials requires urgent research, including the use of immunological or vaccine-based regimen, bacteriotherapy or C. difficile-specific bacteriophages.

Clostridium difficile: recent epidemiologic findings and advances in therapy

Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) has become an important public health problem. The causative organism is acquired by the oral route from an environmental source or by contact with an infected person or a health care worker who serves as a vector. Disruption of the bowel microflora, generally by antibiotics, creates an environment that allows C. difficile to proliferate. Organisms produce toxins A and B, which cause intense inflammation of the colonic mucosa. The syndrome that results includes severe diarrhea, fever, abdominal pain, and leukocytosis. A new strain of C. difficile has become prevalent in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), this strain is called North America PFGE type 1, abbreviated as NAP-1. Clostridium difficile NAP-1 characteristically generates large amounts of toxins A and B, as well as an additional binary toxin and is associated with enhanced morbidity and a poor response to antibiotic therapy. Mild cases of CDAD may respond to cessation of antibiotic therapy, perhaps related to antibody production by the infected person, but most infected persons require antimicrobial therapy. Vancomycin has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for treatment of CDAD, but reluctance to use this antibiotic in the hospital setting has led to reliance on metronidazole as first-line therapy. Recent studies show a high rate of failure, due either to infection by NAP-1 or to the presence, in hospitals, of older and sicker adults who have been treated with many broad-spectrum antibiotics. Nitazoxanide, bacitracin, teicoplanin, and fusidic acid are additional agents that have published efficacy for this indication in humans. Rifaximin and PAR-101 are under investigation. Other therapies, including polymers that bind C. difficile toxin and monoclonal antibodies to toxins, and preventive measures such as toxoid vaccines are also under study.

An update on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated disease

Clostridium difficile is an important cause of nosocomial morbidity and mortality and is implicated in recent epidemics. Data support the treatment of colitis with oral metronidazole in a dose of 1.0 to 1.5 g/d, with oral vancomycin as a second-line agent, not because its efficacy is questioned but because of environmental concerns. Nitazoxanide and other drugs are currently under intense study as alternatives. Treatment of asymptomatic patients is not recommended. Current management strategies appear to be increasingly ineffective, especially for patients who experience multiple recurrences. Biotherapy and vaccination are currently being explored as treatment options for patients who have recurrent disease. Greater attention should be paid to hospital infection control policies and restriction of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: old therapies and new strategies

Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) causes substantial morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving altered bowel flora, production of toxins, and impaired host immunity, often in a nosocomial setting. Current guidelines recommend treatment with metronidazole; vancomycin is a second-line agent because of its potential effect on the hospital environment. We present the data that led to these recommendations and explore other therapeutic options, including antimicrobials, antibody to toxin A, probiotics, and vaccines. Treatment of CDAD has increasingly been associated with failure and recurrence. Recurrent disease may reflect relapse of infection due to the original infecting organism or infection by a new strain. Poor antibody responses to C difficile toxins have a permissive role in recurrent infection. Hospital infection control and pertinent use of antibiotics can limit the spread of CDAD. A vaccine directed against C difficile toxin may eventually offer a solution to the CDAD problem.

In vitro activity of ramoplanin against Clostridium difficile, including strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or with resistance to metronidazole

We evaluated the in vitro activity of ramoplanin, an antimicrobial compound that inhibits cell wall synthesis by acting at the level of lipid intermediate formation, against Clostridium difficile. We included strains with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin (vancomycin-intermediate [Van(i)] strains) or with resistance to metronidazole (Mtz(r)), in order to assess the potential utility of ramoplanin for the treatment of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. We tested the activity of ramoplanin against a total of 105 nonduplicate clinical isolates of toxigenic C. difficile, including 8 Van(i) isolates and 6 Mtz(r) isolates, obtained from our laboratory. Ramoplanin was active against all strains tested at concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 0.5 microg/ml (MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates were inhibited, 0.25 microg/ml; geometric mean MIC, 0.22 microg/ml). All isolates, independently of their levels of susceptibility to vancomycin or metronidazole, were considered susceptible to ramoplanin (MICs, < or =0.5 microg/ml).

In vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, bacitracin, and four other antimicrobials against intestinal anaerobic bacteria

By using an agar dilution method, the in vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, and five other agents were determined against 300 gram-positive and 54 gram-negative strains of intestinal anaerobes. Ramoplanin was active at <or=2 microg/ml against 287 of 300 (95.7%) gram-positive organisms, including 18 strains of Clostridium difficile for which MICs of ramoplanin were 0.25 to 0.5 microg/ml; for 3 of these, linezolid MICs were 8 to 16 micro g/ml. Nineteen Clostridium innocuum strains for which the vancomycin MIC at which 90% of strains were inhibited was 16 microg/ml were susceptible to ramoplanin at 0.06 to 0.25 microg/ml and to teicoplanin at 0.125 to 1.0 microg/ml. All strains of Eubacterium, Actinomyces, Propionibacterium, and Peptostreptococcus spp. were inhibited by <or=0.25 microg of ramoplanin per ml and <or=1 microg of vancomycin per ml. Ramoplanin was also active at <or=4 microg/ml against 15 of 22 of the Prevotella and Porphyromonas strains tested, but ramoplanin MICs for all 31 strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group, the Fusobacterium mortiferum-Fusobacterium varium group, and Veillonella spp. were >or=256 microg/ml. Ramoplanin displays excellent activity against C. difficile and other gram-positive enteric anaerobes, including vancomycin-resistant strains; however, it has poor activity against most gram-negative anaerobes and thus potentially has a lesser effect on the ecological balance of normal fecal flora.

Chemistry and biology of the ramoplanin family of peptide antibiotics

The peptide antibiotic ramoplanin factor A2 is a promising clinical candidate for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections that are resistant to antibiotics such as glycopeptides, macrolides, and penicillins. Since its discovery in 1984, no clinical or laboratory-generated resistance to this antibiotic has been reported. The mechanism of action of ramoplanin involves sequestration of peptidoglycan biosynthesis Lipid intermediates, thus physically occluding these substrates from proper utilization by the late-stage peptidoglycan biosynthesis enzymes MurG and the transglycosylases (TGases). Ramoplanin is structurally related to two cell wall active lipodepsipeptide antibiotics, janiemycin, and enduracidin, and is functionally related to members of the lantibiotic class of antimicrobial peptides (mersacidin, actagardine, nisin, and epidermin) and glycopeptide antibiotics (vancomycin and teicoplanin). Peptidomimetic chemotherapeutics derived from the ramoplanin sequence may find future use as antibiotics against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and related pathogens. Here we review the chemistry and biology of the ramoplanins including its discovery, structure elucidation, biosynthesis, antimicrobial activity, mechanism of action, and total synthesis.

Novel agents for the treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections

Bacteria have proved themselves able to develop resistance to every antibiotic used clinically. Traditional agents used for treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-positive species have recently been supplemented with the introduction of linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, several new quinolones and telithromycin. However, resistance to many of these agents has already been reported and, although each currently retains activity against the vast majority of clinical isolates of its target species, their long-term efficacy is uncertain. We must look to develop other compounds to replace and hopefully improve upon existing anti-Gram-positive agents. Daptomycin (a lipopeptide), oritavancin and dalbavancin (both second-generation glycopeptides) and ramoplanin (a glycolipodepsipeptide) are among the agents in advanced stages of development and, at present, many seem likely to proceed to licensing. In addition, it is encouraging that many agents active against novel bacterial targets have been discovered and are in earlier stages of development. In the next two decades, we should be optimistic that a regular flow of new anti-Gram-positive agents will enable us to offset the constant spectre of bacterial resistance.

In vitro activity of 15 antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile in Kuwait

A total of 73 clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile isolated from stool/rectal swabs of patients admitted to the intensive care units at Mubarak Hospital, Ibn Sina Hospital Burn unit and Haematology wards at the Kuwait Cancer Control Centre, were investigated for their susceptibility to 15 antibiotics using the Etest. Amoxycillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, meropenem, metronidazole, penicillin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, teicoplanin and vancomycin had excellent activities with MIC(90)s of 0.38, 0.5, 1, 0.19, 1.5, 2, 3, 0.25 and 0.75 mg/l, respectively. Of the 73 C. difficile isolates, 86% were resistant to imipenem (MIC(90) >32 mg/l) and almost 97% were resistant to trovafloxacin (MIC(90)>256 mg/l). Forty eight percent of the isolates were resistant to clindamycin. A total of 18 isolates were highly clindamycin-resistant with an MIC of >256 mg/l; 10 of these were toxin producers. Multiple antibiotic resistance (two or more antibiotics) was noted in 63 isolates. These were more common among the toxigenic strains than the non-toxigenic strains by a ratio of 2.5:1.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci

After they were first identified in the mid-1980s, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) spread rapidly and became a major problem in many institutions both in Europe and the United States. Since VRE have intrinsic resistance to most of the commonly used antibiotics and the ability to acquire resistance to most of the current available antibiotics, either by mutation or by receipt of foreign genetic material, they have a selective advantage over other microorganisms in the intestinal flora and pose a major therapeutic challenge. The possibility of transfer of vancomycin resistance genes to other gram-positive organisms raises significant concerns about the emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We review VRE, including their history, mechanisms of resistance, epidemiology, control measures, and treatment.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci

After they were first identified in the mid-1980s, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) spread rapidly and became a major problem in many institutions both in Europe and the United States. Since VRE have intrinsic resistance to most of the commonly used antibiotics and the ability to acquire resistance to most of the current available antibiotics, either by mutation or by receipt of foreign genetic material, they have a selective advantage over other microorganisms in the intestinal flora and pose a major therapeutic challenge. The possibility of transfer of vancomycin resistance genes to other gram-positive organisms raises significant concerns about the emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We review VRE, including their history, mechanisms of resistance, epidemiology, control measures, and treatment.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities and serogroups of clinical strains of Clostridium difficile isolated in France in 1991 and 1997

Glycopeptides (vancomycin and teicoplanin) and metronidazole are the drugs of choice for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections, but trends in susceptibility patterns have not been assessed in the past few years. The objective was to study the MICs of glycopeptides and metronidazole for unrelated C. difficile strains isolated in 1991 (n = 100) and in 1997 (n = 98) by the agar macrodilution, the E-test, and the disk diffusion methods. Strain susceptibilities to erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, rifampin, and chloramphenicol were also determined by the ATB ANA gallery (bioMérieux, La Balme-les-Grottes, France). The MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)s) and MIC(90)s of glycopeptides and metronidazole remained stable between 1991 and 1997. All the strains were inhibited by concentrations that did not exceed 2 microgram/ml for vancomycin and 1 microg/ml for teicoplanin. Comparison of MICs determined by the agar dilution method recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards and the E test showed correlations (+/-2 dilutions) of 86. 6, 95.9, and 99% for metronidazole, vancomycin, and teicoplanin, respectively. The E test always underestimated the MICs. Strains with decreased susceptibility to metronidazole (MICs, >/=8 microgram/ml) were isolated from six patients (n = 4 in 1991 and n = 2 in 1997). These strains were also detected by the disk diffusion method (zone inhibition diameter, </=21 mm); they belonged to nontoxigenic serogroup D (n = 5) and toxigenic serogroup H (n = 1). Decreased susceptibility to erythromycin (MICs, >/=1 microgram/ml), clindamycin (MICs, >/=2 microgram/ml), tetracycline (MICs, >/=8 microgram/ml), rifampin (MICs, >/=4 microgram/ml), and chloramphenicol (MICs, >/=16 microgram/ml) was observed in 64.2, 80.3, 23.7, 22.7, and 14.6% of strains, respectively. Strains isolated in 1997 were more susceptible than those isolated in 1991, and this trend was correlated to a major change in serogroup distribution. Periodic studies are needed in order to detect changes in serogroups and the emergence of strains with decreased susceptibility to therapeutic drugs.

Determination of ramoplanin in human urine by high-performance liquid chromatography with automated column switching

Ramoplanin is a novel glycolipodepsipeptide antibiotic, currently undergoing clinical trials. This method describes the determination of ramoplanin by direct injection of human urine into a coupled-column liquid chromatographic system. An internal-surface reversed-phase column has been used for on-line sample clean-up and enrichment. Analytical separation of ramoplanin and MDL 62,456 used as internal standard, has been achieved on a ABZ+ reversed-phase column with ammonium acetate buffer-acetonitrile-methanol according to a gradient profile. Analytes were detected by their UV absorbance at 270 nm. The limit of quantitation was 0.1 microgram/ml urine and the limit of detection was found to be 0.035 microgram/ml, corresponding to 13.7 pmol/ml. Linearity was determined in the range 0.1-2 micrograms/ml. Precision (relative standard deviation) ranged from 0.71 to 8.75% and the accuracy from -9.9 to 11.6%. Different human sources were tested and no interference between analytes and urine constituents was observed. The method is simple and rapid, requiring a total analysis time of 35 min per sample and reaching greater selectivity and accuracy than microbiological assays.

Gastrointestinal tract colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an animal model

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci have become important nosocomial pathogens in many institutions. The gastrointestinal tract of susceptible hosts serves as the likely reservoir from which the organism is disseminated. To study factors promoting colonization and the efficacy of decontamination therapy with antimicrobial agents, a model of gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was developed in CF1 mice. At baseline, all animals were colonized with non-vancomycin-resistant enterococci (5.0 log10 CFU/g), but vancomycin-resistant organisms were not detectable. Following gastric inoculation with 5 x 10(8) CFU of a clinical isolate of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, the strain transiently colonized the gastrointestinal tract of 100% of mice but was undetectable by Day 14 (< or = 2.7 log10 mean CFU/g). In animals who received 5 mg of streptomycin per ml or 250 micrograms of vancomycin per ml in drinking water, colonization with the organism occurred at significantly higher bacterial counts than in controls at 7 days following inoculation (9.4 for vancomycin, 9.2 for streptomycin, and 5.1 log10 mean CFU/g for controls; P < 0.05). Fecal concentrations of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium persisted at high counts through Day 22 in mice receiving these antibiotics, but low counts were also still detected in 3 of 10 control animals. In mice with previously established vancomycin-resistant E. faecium colonization, oral administration of ramoplanin, a lipoglycodepsipeptide to which the strain was susceptible, suppressed growth of all enterococci in feces, including the vancomycin-resistant strain after 7 days of therapy (< or = 3.1 and < or = 3.3 log10 mean CFU/g for vancomycin and streptomycin groups, respectively). All mice had a recurrence of colonization with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium after the ramoplanin was discontinued. In summary, this animal model demonstrates the importance of antibiotics in predisposing to gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. Although treatment with ramoplanin temporarily suppressed the organism, recurrence of colonization due to relapse or reinfection occurred.

Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance

In the last 5 years, clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria with intrinsic or acquired resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics have been encountered increasingly. In many of these isolates, resistance arises from an alteration of the antibiotic target site, with the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine moiety of peptidoglycan precursors being replaced by groups that do not bind glycopeptides. Although the criteria for defining resistance have been revised frequently, the reliable detection of low-level glycopeptide resistance remains problematic and is influenced by the method chosen. Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci have emerged as a particular problem in hospitals, where in addition to sporadic cases, clusters of infections with evidence of interpatient spread have occurred. Studies using molecular typing methods have implicated colonization of patients, staff carriage, and environmental contamination in the dissemination of these bacteria. Choice of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant bacteria may be complicated by resistance to other antibiotics. Severe therapeutic difficulties are being encountered among patients infected with enterococci, with some infections being untreatable with currently available antibiotics.

Clostridium difficile infection: a common clinical problem for the general internist

Considering the current wide use of antimicrobial agents, the general internist is commonly faced with the patient at risk for diarrhea due to C. difficile. The diagnosis should be considered for any patient with diarrhea who has received any type of antibiotic therapy in the preceding 4-6 weeks. Symptoms may range from a minor bout of diarrhea to fulminant and fatal colitis. Diagnosis usually requires demonstration of the toxin in stool; culture of the organism and fiberoptic endoscopy may play an adjunctive role in selected clinical settings. The ultimate goal in the treatment for C. difficile infection is to repopulate the normal colonic flora in the most efficacious manner. Minimally symptomatic patients may respond to discontinuing the offending antimicrobial agent or using nonspecific binding agents. Oral vancomycin continues to be the "gold standard" for specific treatment, while metronidazole therapy is considered the first-line agent for individuals with milder infection. Oral bacitracin shows promise, though large studies are lacking. Patients with multiple relapses of C. difficile diarrhea can be treated with prolonged courses of vancomycin or a combination of vancomycin and rifampin. Intensive care unit patients who are NPO have few therapeutic options besides intravenous administration of metronidazole and oral administration of vancomycin via clamped nasogastric tube. Preventive efforts are directed at cautious use of antibiotics and the use of vinyl gloves when caring for patients with known infection.

Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy

Since an earlier review in the Journal substantial additional data have accumulated, further clarifying the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic profile, clinical efficacy and tolerability of teicoplanin. Recent therapeutic trials confirm the efficacy of teicoplanin in the treatment of microbiologically confirmed Gram-positive infections, including septicaemia, endocarditis, and infections of skin and soft tissue, bone and joints, and the lower respiratory tract. As teicoplanin can be administered once daily intramuscularly as well as intravenously, it has potential for outpatient treatment of severe Gram-positive infections. Teicoplanin is appropriate as treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia, but there is still controversy over the timing for introduction of glycopeptide antibiotics into therapeutic regimens. Teicoplanin is generally reserved for secondary therapy of patients with documented bacteraemia who fail to respond to initial empirical antibiotic regimens, but probably should be part of the initial empirical regimen in the setting of a high incidence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Teicoplanin has a lower propensity than vancomycin to impair renal function when either drug is combined with an aminoglycoside, causes fewer anaphylactoid reactions, and appears to be of comparable efficacy. Thus, teicoplanin may be preferred to vancomycin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections, and where a glycopeptide antibiotic is deemed a necessary inclusion in a regimen for empirical treatment in patients with fever and neutropenia.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of enterococci isolated from hospitalized patients

One hundred and one isolates of Enterococcus species isolated recently from hospitalized patients were evaluated in vitro for antibiotic susceptibility. Teicoplanin and mideplanin were the most active agents, followed by ramoplanin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, and imipenem. High-level resistance to gentamicin (MIC > 500 micrograms/ml) and/or streptomycin (MIC > 2,000 micrograms/ml) was found in 60 isolates. High-level resistance to ampicillin (MIC > or = 16 micrograms/ml) was found in 17 isolates. MBC studies revealed that ramoplanin possesses significant bactericidal activity.

Isolation, structure determination and biological activity of A-16686 factors A′ 1, A′ 2 and A′ 3 glycolipodepsipeptide antibiotics

When Actinoplanes strain ATCC 33076, the producer of A-16686 A1, A2 and A3 complex, is fermented in a suitable medium three additional factors, designated A' 1, A' 2 and A' 3 are produced. These were isolated and characterized, and were shown to differ from the parent components of the original complex by lacking one mannose unit. Bioconversion of A factors into A' factors was achieved by incubation with the mycelium of Actinoplanes ATCC 33076. Factor A' 2 has better antibacterial activity than A2 against some bacteria.

Prospective study of oral teicoplanin versus oral vancomycin for therapy of pseudomembranous colitis and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

A prospective, randomized study comparing oral teicoplanin with oral vancomycin in the treatment of pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) was performed. Teicoplanin was administered at a dosage of 100 mg twice a day for 10 days, and vancomycin was administered at a dosage of 500 mg four times a day for 10 days. CDAD was diagnosed by demonstrating both C. difficile and cytotoxin in the feces of symptomatic patients (more than three loose stools per day). The diagnosis of PMC was also based on colonoscopy. Cytotoxin assay and cultures were checked in all patients 7 to 10 days after discontinuation of therapy and 25 to 30 days thereafter. Of the 51 patients enrolled, 46 were judged to be assessable. Among these, 26 received teicoplanin and 20 received vancomycin. At enrollment, both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, occurrence of PMC or CDAD, and previous antibiotic treatment. Eighteen of the 20 patients in the vancomycin group and 10 of the 26 patients in the teicoplanin group had previously undergone surgery (P = 0.0004). Treatment resulted in the clinical cure of 20 (100%) vancomycin and 25 (96.2%) teicoplanin patients (P = 0.56). After discontinuation of therapy, clinical symptoms recurred in four (20%) vancomycin patients and two (7.7%) teicoplanin patients (P = 0.21). Posttherapy asymptomatic C. difficile carriage (positive follow-up cultures without any clinical symptoms) occurred in five (25%) vancomycin patients and two (7.7%) teicoplanin patients (P = 0.11).Overall, 9 of 20 (45%) vancomycin patients and 5 of 26 (19.2%) teicoplanin patients (P=0.059) appeared not to be cleared of C. difficile after treatment. No adverse effects related to vancomycin or teicoplanin therapy were observed.

Bactericidal activity of ramoplanin against antibiotic-resistant enterococci

Ramoplanin, a new lipoglycodepsipeptide antibiotic, was uniformly active against 65 strains of enterococci, including strains highly resistant to vancomycin, penicillin G, and gentamicin. MBCs were usually within a fourfold dilution of the MICs. In time-kill studies, ramoplanin alone demonstrated dose-dependent bactericidal activity against enterococcal strains that resisted killing by vancomycin or penicillin in combination with gentamicin.

In vitro activities of three semisynthetic amide derivatives of teicoplanin, MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873

MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873 are three semisynthetic amide derivatives of teicoplanin (MDL 62208 is an amide of teicoplanin aglycone, MDL 62211 is an amide of the teicoplanin A2 complex, and MDL 62873 is the corresponding derivative of peak A2-2 of the complex). The three semisynthetic glycopeptides were evaluated for in vitro antibacterial activity in comparison with the parent drug (teicoplanin) and vancomycin. A variety of gram-positive bacteria of clinical origin, whose species were carefully determined and that included 428 staphylococci (207 methicillin susceptible and 221 methicillin resistant), 41 streptococci, 82 enterococci, 43 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 10 JK coryneform bacteria, and 67 anaerobes belonging to the genera Clostridium, Propionibacterium, Peptostreptococcus, and Eubacterium, were tested. The only resistances to MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873 were encountered with vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant enterococci. All of the other test strains, including some teicoplanin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci of the species Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, were highly susceptible to the three teicoplanin amides. Only minor differences in activity were observed among MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873, whereas the three experimental compounds were usually found to be more potent than teicoplanin or vancomycin (especially against staphylococci, with differences mostly ranging from 2- to 16-fold). The MBC-to-MIC ratios varied depending on the organisms, with the highest ratios usually observed for enterococci and listeriae. Overall, the MBC-to-MIC ratios yielded by the teicoplanin analogs were slightly greater than those yielded by teicoplanin or vancomycin.