Placebo-controlled trial of itraconazole for treatment of acute vaginal candidiasis

Treatment for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

BACKGROUND

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) affects up to 5% of women. No comprehensive systematic review of treatments for RVVC has been published.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for RVVC. The secondary objective was to assess patient preference of treatment options.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted electronic searches of bibliographic databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL (search date 6 October 2021). We also handsearched reference lists of identified trials and contacted authors of identified trials, experts in RVVC, and manufacturers of products for vulvovaginal candidiasis.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials evaluating RVVC treatments for at least six months, in women with four or more symptomatic episodes of vulvovaginal candidiasis in the past year. We excluded women with immunosuppressive disorders or taking immunosuppressant medication. We included women with diabetes mellitus and pregnant women. Diagnosis of RVVC must have been confirmed by presence of symptoms and a positive culture and/or microscopy. We included all drug and non-drug therapies and partner treatment, assessing the following primary outcomes: • number of clinical recurrences per participant per year (recurrence defined as clinical signs and positive culture/microscopy); • proportion of participants with at least one clinical recurrence during the treatment and follow-up period; and • adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts to identify eligible trials. Duplicate data extraction was completed independently by two authors. We assessed risk of bias as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We used the fixed-effects model for pooling and expressed the results as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where important statistical heterogeneity was present we either did not pool data (I² > 70%) or used a random-effects model (I² 40-70%). We used the GRADE tool to assess overall certainty of the evidence for the pooled primary outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Studies: Twenty-three studies involving 2212 women aged 17 to 67 years met the inclusion criteria. Most studies excluded pregnant women and women with diabetes or immunosuppression. The predominant species found on culture at study entry was Candida albicans. Overall, the included studies were small (<100 participants). Six studies compared antifungal treatment with placebo (607 participants); four studies compared oral versus topical antifungals (543 participants); one study compared different oral antifungals (45 participants); two studies compared different dosing regimens for antifungals (100 participants); one study compared two different dosing regimens of the same topical agent (23 participants); one study compared short versus longer treatment duration (26 participants); two studies assessed the effect of partner treatment (98 participants); one study compared a complementary treatment (Lactobacillus vaginal tablets and probiotic oral tablets) with placebo (34 participants); three studies compared complementary medicine with antifungals (354 participants); two studies compared 'dermasilk' briefs with cotton briefs (130 participants); one study examined Lactobacillus vaccination versus heliotherapy versus ciclopyroxolamine (90 participants); one study compared CAM treatments to an antifungal treatment combined with CAM treatments (68 participants). We did not find any studies comparing different topical antifungals. Nine studies reported industry funding, three were funded by an independent source and eleven did not report their funding source. Risk of bias: Overall, the risk of bias was high or unclear due to insufficient blinding of allocation and participants and poor reporting. Primary outcomes: Meta-analyses comparing drug treatments (oral and topical) with placebo or no treatment showed there may be a clinically relevant reduction in clinical recurrence at 6 months (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.63; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 2; participants = 607; studies = 6; I² = 82%; low-certainty evidence) and 12 months (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89; NNTB = 6; participants = 585; studies = 6; I² = 21%; low-certainty evidence). No study reported on the number of clinical recurrences per participant per year. We are very uncertain whether oral drug treatment compared to topical treatment increases the risk of clinical recurrence at 6 months (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.83 to 3.31; participants = 206; studies = 3; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence) and reduces the risk of clinical recurrence at 12 months (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.27; participants = 206; studies = 3; I² = 10%; very low-certainty evidence). No study reported on the number of clinical recurrences per participant per year. Adverse events were scarce across both treatment and control groups in both comparisons. The reporting of adverse events varied amongst studies, was generally of very low quality and could not be pooled. Overall the adverse event rate was low for both placebo and treatment arms and ranged from less than 5% to no side effects or complications.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women with RVVC, treatment with oral or topical antifungals may reduce symptomatic clinical recurrences when compared to placebo or no treatment. We were unable to find clear differences between different treatment options (e.g. oral versus topical treatment, different doses and durations). These findings are not applicable to pregnant or immunocompromised women and women with diabetes as the studies did not include or report on them. More research is needed to determine the optimal medication, dose and frequency.

Efficacy and safety of oral ibrexafungerp for the treatment of acute vulvovaginal candidiasis: a global phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled superiority study (VANISH 306)

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrexafungerp versus placebo for acute vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) treatment.

Design

Global phase 3, randomised, placebo‐controlled superiority study.

Setting

Study sites in the USA (n = 19) and Bulgaria (n = 18).

Population

Female patients aged ≥12 years with acute VVC and a vulvovaginal signs and symptoms (VSS) score ≥4 at baseline.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to ibrexafungerp (300 mg twice for 1 day) or placebo.

Main outcome measures

The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a clinical cure (VSS = 0) at the test‐of‐cure visit (day 11 ± 3). Secondary endpoints included percentages of patients with mycological eradication, clinical cure and mycological eradication (overall success), clinical improvement (VSS ≤1) at test‐of‐cure visit, and complete resolution of symptoms at follow‐up visit (day 25 ± 4).

Results

At the test‐of‐cure visit, patients receiving ibrexafungerp had significantly higher rates of clinical cure (63.3% [119/188] versus 44.0% [37/84]; P = 0.007), mycological eradication (58.5% [110/188] versus 29.8% [25/84]; P < 0.001), overall success (46.1% [82/188] versus 28.4% [23/84]; P = 0.022) and clinical improvement (72.3% [136/188] versus 54.8% [46/84]; P = 0.01) versus those receiving placebo. Symptom resolution was sustained and further increased with ibrexafungerp (73.9%) versus placebo (52.4%) at follow‐up (P = 0.001). Ibrexafungerp was generally well tolerated. Adverse events were primarily gastrointestinal and were mild to moderate in severity.

Conclusions

Ibrexafungerp demonstrated statistical superiority over placebo for the primary and secondary endpoints. Ibrexafungerp is a promising novel, well‐tolerated and effective oral 1‐day treatment for acute VVC.

Tweetable abstract

Ibrexafungerp is statistically superior to placebo for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Ibrexafungerp is statistically superior to placebo for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Linked article This article is commented on by KSJ Olah, p. 421–422 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17000.

Ibrexafungerp versus placebo for vulvovaginal candidiasis treatment: a phase 3, randomized, controlled superiority trial (VANISH 303)

Background

Current treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is largely limited to azole therapy. Ibrexafungerp is a first-in-class triterpenoid antifungal with broad-spectrum anti-Candida fungicidal activity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrexafungerp compared with placebo in patients with acute VVC.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive ibrexafungerp (300 mg twice for 1 day) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a clinical cure (complete resolution of vulvovaginal signs and symptoms [VSS] = 0) at test-of-cure (day 11 ± 3). Secondary endpoints included the percentage of patients with mycological eradication, overall success (clinical cure and mycological eradication), clinical improvement (VSS ≤ 1) at test-of-cure, and symptom resolution at follow-up (day 25 ± 4).

Results

Patients receiving ibrexafungerp had significantly higher rates of clinical cure (50.5% [95/188] vs 28.6% [28/98]; P = .001), mycological eradication (49.5% [93/188] vs 19.4% [19/98]; P < .001), and overall success (36.0% [64/178] vs 12.6% [12/95]; P < .001) compared with placebo. Symptom resolution was sustained and further increased with ibrexafungerp compared with placebo (59.6% [112/188] vs 44.9% [44/98]; P = .009) at follow-up. Post hoc analysis showed similar rates of clinical cure and clinical improvement at test-of-cure for Black patients (54.8% [40/73] and 63.4% [47/73], respectively) and patients with a body mass index >35 (54.5% [24/44] and 68.2% [30/44], respectively) compared with overall rates. Ibrexafungerp was well tolerated. Adverse events were primarily gastrointestinal and mild in severity.

Conclusions

Ibrexafungerp provides a promising safe and efficacious oral treatment that mechanistically differs from current azole treatment options for acute VVC.

Clotrimazole for Vulvovaginal Candidosis: More Than 45 Years of Clinical Experience

Vulvovaginal candidosis is a common disease, and various treatment strategies have emerged over the last few decades. Clotrimazole belongs to the drugs of choice for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidosis. Although available for almost 50 years, systematic reviews on the usefulness of topical clotrimazole across disease severity and populations affected are scarce. Thus, we conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed and Embase databases to summarize the effectiveness and safety of topical clotrimazole in the treatment of uncomplicated (acute) and complicated vulvovaginal candidosis. In total, 37 randomized controlled studies in women suffering from vaginal yeast infections qualified for inclusion in our review. In women with uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidosis, single intravaginal doses of clotrimazole 500 mg vaginal tablets provided high cure rates and were as effective as oral azoles. A single dose of clotrimazole 500 mg was equipotent to multiple doses of lower dose strengths. Prolonged treatment regimens proved to be effective in severe and recurrent cases as well as in symptomatic pregnant women. It is therefore expected that in the general population, clotrimazole will continue to be widely used in the field of vaginal health in the upcoming years; more so as clotrimazole resistance in vaginal candidosis is rare.

Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

BACKGROUND

Anti-fungals are available for oral and intra-vaginal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review is to assess the relative effectiveness (clinical cure) of oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungals for the treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. Secondary objectives include the assessment of the relative effectiveness in terms of mycological cure, in addition to safety, side effects, treatment preference, time to first relief of symptoms, and costs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 29 August 2019 together with reference checking and citation searching.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials published in any language comparing at least one oral anti-fungal with one intra-vaginal anti-fungal in women (aged 16 years or over) with a mycological diagnosis (positive culture, microscopy for yeast, or both) of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. We excluded trials if they solely involved participants who were HIV positive, immunocompromised, pregnant, breast feeding or diabetic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as recommended by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes 26 trials (5007 participants). Eight anti-fungals are represented. All but three trials included participants with acute vulvovaginal candidiasis. Trials were conducted in Europe: UK (3), Croatia (2). Finland (2), the Netherlands (2), Germany (1), Italy (1), Sweden (1) and one trial across multiple European countries, USA (7) Thailand (2), Iran (2), Japan (1) and Africa (Nigeria) (1). The duration of follow-up varied between trials. The overall risk of bias of the included trials was high. There was probably little or no difference shown between oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment for clinical cure at short-term follow-up (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.43; 13 trials; 1859 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and long-term follow-up (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.50; 9 trials; 1042 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the rate of clinical cure at short-term follow-up with intra-vaginal treatment is 77%, the rate with oral treatment would be between 75% and 83%; if the rate of clinical cure at long term follow-up with intra-vaginal treatment is 84%, the rate with oral treatment would be between 80% and 89%. Oral treatment probably improves mycological cure over intra-vaginal treatment at short term (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.50: 19 trials; 3057 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and long-term follow-up (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.60; 13 trials; 1661 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the rate of mycological cure at short-term follow-up with intra-vaginal treatment is 80%, the rate with oral treatment would be between 80% and 85%; if the rate of mycological cure at long-term follow-up with intra-vaginal treatment is 66%, the rate with oral treatment would be between 67% and 76%. In terms of patient safety, there is a low risk of participants withdrawing from the studies due to adverse drug effects for either treatment (23 trials; 4637 participants; high-certainty evidence). Due to the low certainty of evidence, it is undetermined whether oral treatments reduced the number of side effects compared with intra-vaginal treatments (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.29; 16 trials; 3155 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the rate of side effects with intra-vaginal treatment is 12%, the rate with oral treatment would be between 10% and 15%. We noted that the type of side effects differed, with intra-vaginal treatments being more often associated with local reactions, and oral treatments being more often associated with systemic effects including gastro-intestinal symptoms and headaches. Oral treatment appeared to be the favoured treatment preference over intra-vaginal treatment or no preference (12 trials; 2206 participants), however the data were poorly reported and the certainty of the evidence was low. There was little or no difference in time to first relief of symptoms between oral and intra-vaginal treatments: four trials favoured the oral treatment, four favoured intra-vaginal, one study reported no difference and one was unclear. The measurements varied between the 10 trials (1910 participants) and the certainty of the evidence was low. Costs were not reported in any of the trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Oral anti-fungal treatment probably improves short- and long-term mycological cure over intra-vaginal treatment for uncomplicated vaginal candidiasis. Oral treatment was the favoured treatment preference by participants, though the certainty of this evidence is low. The decision to prescribe or recommend an anti-fungal for oral or intra-vaginal administration should take into consideration safety in terms of withdrawals and side effects, as well as cost and treatment preference. Unless there is a previous history of adverse reaction to one route of administration or contraindications, women who are purchasing their own treatment should be given full information about the characteristics and costs of treatment to make their own decision. If health services are paying the treatment cost, decision-makers should consider whether the higher cost of some oral anti-fungals is worth the gain in convenience, if this is the patient's preference.

Antifungal (oral and vaginal) therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is frequent in women worldwide and usually responds rapidly to topical or oral antifungal therapy. However, some women develop recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), which is arbitrarily defined as four or more episodes every year. RVVC is a debilitating, long-term condition that can severely affect the quality of life of women. Most VVC is diagnosed and treated empirically and women frequently self-treat with over-the-counter medications that could contribute to an increase in the antifungal resistance. The effective treatment of RVVC has been a challenge in daily clinical practice. This review aims to assess the efficacy of antifungal agents administered orally or intravaginally for the treatment of RVVC, in order to define clinical practices that will impact on the reduction of the morbidity and antifungal resistance.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A comprehensive search of the following databases will be carried out: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Virtual Health Library)/Biblioteca Regional de Medicina (Regional Library of Medicine) (BVS/BIREME), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and in the clinical trials databases (www.trialscentral.org; www.controlled-trials.com; www.clinicaltrials.gov). The risk of bias will be assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We will perform data synthesis using the Review Manager (RevMan) software V.5.2.3. To assess heterogeneity, we will compute the I2 statistic.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will be a review of published data and it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. Findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018093817.

Efficacy of antifungal drugs in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Antifungal drugs are used frequently in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), but have shown controversial results. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different antifungal drugs in the treatment of VVC and to provide an evidence-based reference for clinical use.

METHODS

The published studies on the effectiveness of antifungal drugs in the treatment of VVC (up to April 2018) were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Clini-calTrials.gov. We sifted through the literature according to Patients, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcomes principle, extracted data on the basic characteristics of the study, and evaluated the quality of included studies. We used R software for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 41 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The relative risk of VVC associated with ten drugs, including placebo, fluconazole, clotrimazole, miconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, econazole, butoconazole, terbinafine, and terconazole, was analyzed. The following drugs appeared to show more efficacy than placebo in the treated patients: fluconazole (OR =6.45, 95% CrI 4.42-9.41), clotrimazole (OR =2.99, 95% CrI 1.61-5.55), miconazole (OR =5.96, 95% CrI 3.17-11.2), itraconazole (OR =2.29, 95% CrI 1.21-4.33), ketoconazole (OR =2.40, 95% CrI 1.55-3.71), butoconazole (OR =1.18, 95% CrI 1.06-1.31), and terconazole (OR =5.60, 95% CrI 2.78-11.3). The value of surface under the cumulative ranking curve of each drug was as follows: placebo (0.5%), fluconazole (91.5%), clotrimazole (61.8%), miconazole (33.8%), itraconazole (50.5%), ketoconazole (42.8%), econazole (46.8%), butoconazole (82.2%), terbinafine (20.9%), and terconazole (65.0%).

CONCLUSION

Antifungal drugs are effective in the treatment of VVC. Fluconazole appeared to be the best drug for the treatment of VVC according to our analysis.

Mucoadhesive in situ gel formulation for vaginal delivery of clotrimazole: formulation, preparation, and in vitro/in vivo evaluation

The purpose of this study was to develop a suitable mucoadhesive in situ gel formulation of clotrimazole (CLO) for the treatment of vaginal candidiasis. For this aim, the mixture of poloxamer (PLX) 407 and 188 were used to prepare in situ gels. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) K100M or E50 was added to in situ gels in 0.5% ratio to improve the mucoadhesive and mechanical properties of formulations and to prolong the residence time in vaginal cavity. After the preparation of mucoadhesive in situ gels; gelation temperature/time, viscosity, mechanical, mucoadhesive, syringeability, spreadibility and rheological properties, in vitro release behavior, and anticandidal activities were determined. Moreover vaginal retention of mucoadhesive in situ gels was investigated with in vivo distribution studies in rats. Based on the obtained results, it was found that gels prepared with 20% PLX 407, 10% PLX 188 and 0.5% HPMC K100M/E50 might be suitable for vaginal administration of CLO. In addition, the results of in vivo distribution studies showed that gel formulations remained on the vaginal mucosa even 24 h after application. In conclusion, the mucoadhesive in situ gels of CLO would be alternative candidate for treatment of vaginal candidiasis since it has suitable gel properties with good vaginal retention.

Candidiasis (vulvovaginal)

INTRODUCTION

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is estimated to be the second most common cause of vaginitis after bacterial vaginosis. Candida albicans accounts for 85% to 90% of cases.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of drug treatments for acute vulvovaginal candidiasis in non-pregnant symptomatic women? What are the effects of alternative or complementary treatments for acute vulvovaginal candidiasis in non-pregnant symptomatic women? What are the effects of treating asymptomatic non-pregnant women with a positive swab for candidiasis? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to October 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 23 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: alternative or complementary treatments; douching; drug treatments; garlic; intravaginal preparations (nystatin, imidazoles, tea tree oil); oral fluconazole; oral itraconazole; and yoghurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus (oral or intravaginal).

Patient preferences and treatment safety for uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis in primary health care

Background

Vaginitis is a common complaint in primary care. In uncomplicated candidal vaginitis, there are no differences in effectiveness between oral or vaginal treatment. Some studies describe that the preferred treatment is the oral one, but a Cochrane's review points out inconsistencies associated with the report of the preferred way that limit the use of such data. Risk factors associated with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis still remain controversial.

Methods/Design

This work describes a protocol of a multicentric prospective observational study with one year follow up, to describe the women's reasons and preferences to choose the way of administration (oral vs topical) in the treatment of not complicated candidal vaginitis. The number of women required is 765, they are chosen by consecutive sampling. All of whom are aged 16 and over with vaginal discharge and/or vaginal pruritus, diagnosed with not complicated vulvovaginitis in Primary Care in Madrid.

The main outcome variable is the preferences of the patients in treatment choice; secondary outcome variables are time to symptoms relief and adverse reactions and the frequency of recurrent vulvovaginitis and the risk factors. In the statistical analysis, for the main objective will be descriptive for each of the variables, bivariant analysis and multivariate analysis (logistic regression).. The dependent variable being the type of treatment chosen (oral or topical) and the independent, the variables that after bivariant analysis, have been associated to the treatment preference.

Discussion

Clinical decisions, recommendations, and practice guidelines must not only attend to the best available evidence, but also to the values and preferences of the informed patient.

Systemic vs. topical therapy for the treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

It is estimated that 75% of all women will experience at least 1 episode of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) during their lifetimes. Most patients with acute VVC can be treated with short-term regimens that optimize compliance. Since current topical and oral antifungals have shown comparably high efficacy rates, other issues should be considered in determining the most appropriate therapy. It is possible that the use of short-duration narrow-spectrum agents may increase selection of more resistant organisms which will result in an increase of recurrent VVC (RVVC). Women who are known or suspected to be pregnant and women of childbearing age who are not using a reliable means of contraception should receive topical therapy, as should those who are breast-feeding or receiving drugs that can interact with an oral azole and those who have previously experienced adverse effects during azole therapy. Because of the potential risks associated with systemic treatment, topical therapy with a broad-spectrum agent should be the method of choice for VVC, whereas systemic therapy should be reserved for either RVVC or cases where the benefits outweigh any possible adverse reactions.

Candidiasis (vulvovaginal)

INTRODUCTION

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is estimated to be the second most common cause of vaginitis after bacterial vaginosis. Candida albicans accounts for 85% to 90% of cases.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of drug treatments for acute vulvovaginal candidiasis in non-pregnant symptomatic women? What are the effects of alternative or complementary treatments for acute vulvovaginal candidiasis in non-pregnant symptomatic women? What are the effects of treating a male sexual partner to resolve symptoms and prevent recurrence in non-pregnant women with symptomatic acute vulvovaginal candidiasis? What are the effects of alternative or complementary treatments for symptomatic recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in non-pregnant women? What are the effects of treating a male sexual partner in non-pregnant women with symptomatic recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis? What are the effects of treating asymptomatic non-pregnant women with a positive swab for candidiasis? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to March 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 61 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: alternative or complementary treatments; douching; drug treatments; garlic; intravaginal preparations (boric acid, nystatin, imidazoles, tea tree oil); oral fluconazole; oral itraconazole; treating a male sexual partner; and yoghurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus (oral or vaginal).

A novel itraconazole bioadhesive film for vaginal delivery: design, optimization, and physicodynamic characterization

The purpose of this work was to design and optimize a novel vaginal drug delivery system for more effective treatment against vaginal candidiasis. Itraconazole was formulated in bioadhesive film formulations that could be retained in the vagina for prolonged intervals. The polymeric films were prepared by solvent evaporation and optimized for various physicodynamic and aesthetic properties. In addition, percentage drug retained on vaginal mucosa was evaluated using a simulated dynamic vaginal system as function of time. A polymeric film containing 100 mg itraconazole per unit (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm) have been developed using generally regarded as safe listed excipients. The pH of vaginal film was found to be slightly acidic (4.90 +/- 0.04) in simulated vaginal fluid and alkaline (7.04 +/- 0.07) in water. The little moisture content (7.66 +/- 0.51% w/w) was present in the film, which helps them to remain stable and kept them from being completely dry and brittle. The mechanical properties, tensile strength, and percentage elongation at break (9.64 N/mm(2) and 67.56% for ITRF(65)) reveal that the formulations were found to be soft and tough. The films (ITRF(65)) contained solid dispersion of itraconazole (2.5)/hydroxypropyl cellulose (1)/polyethylene glycol 400 (0.5), which was found to be the optimal composition for a novel bioadhesive vaginal formulation, as they showed good peelability, relatively good swelling index, and moderate tensile strength and retained vaginal mucosa up to 8 h. Also, the film did not markedly affect normal vaginal flora (lactobacillus) and was noncytotoxic as indicated by the negligible decrease in cell viability.

Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

BACKGROUND

Anti-fungals are available for oral and intra-vaginal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush).

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to assess the relative effectiveness of oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungals for the treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. The secondary objectives of the review were to assess the cost-effectiveness, safety and patient preference of oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungals.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following sources were searched for the original review: The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 1999), MEDLINE (January 1985 to May 2000), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2000) and the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials. The manufacturers of anti-fungals available in the UK were contacted. For the update, CENTRAL (January 2000 to August 2006), PUBMED (January 2000 to August 2006), EMBASE (January 2000 to August 2006) and the Cochrane STD Group Specialised Register were searched in August 2006. The reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed manually.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials published in any language. Trials had to compare at least one oral anti-fungal with one intra-vaginal anti-fungal. Women (aged 16 years or over) with uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. The diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis to be made mycologically (i.e. a positive culture and / or microscopy for yeast). Trials were excluded if they solely involved subjects who were HIV positive, immunocompromised, pregnant, breast feeding or diabetic. The primary outcome measure was clinical cure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts of the electronic search results and full text of potentially relevant papers. Independent duplicate abstraction was performed by two reviewers. Disagreements regarding trial inclusion or data abstraction were resolved by discussion between the reviewers. Odds ratios were pooled using the fixed effects models (except for two analyses when random effects models were used because of potentially important heterogeneity).

MAIN RESULTS

Two new trials reporting three comparisons were found in the update. Nineteen trials are included in the review, reporting 22 oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungal comparisons. No statistically significant differences were shown between oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment for clinical cure at short term (OR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.17) and long term (OR 1.07, 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.41) follow-up. No statistically significant differences for mycological cure were observed between oral and intra-vaginal treatment at short term (OR 1.15, 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.42). There was a statistically significant difference for long term follow-up (OR 1.29, 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.60) in favour of oral treatment, however the clinical significance of this result is uncertain. Two trials each reported one withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse reaction. Treatment preference data were poorly reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were observed in clinical cure rates of anti-fungals administered by the oral and intra-vaginal routes for the treatment of uncomplicated vaginal candidiasis. No definitive conclusion can be made regarding the relative safety of oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungals for uncomplicated vaginal candidiasis. The decision to prescribe or recommend the purchase of an anti-fungal for oral or intra-vaginal administration should take into consideration: safety, cost and treatment preference. Unless there is a previous history of adverse reaction to one route of administration or contraindications, women who are purchasing their own treatment should be given full information about the characteristics and costs of treatment to make their own decision. If health services are paying the treatment cost, decision-makers should consider whether the higher cost of some oral anti-fungals is worth the gain in convenience, if this is the patient's preference.

Emerging azole antifungals

Systemic and superficial fungal infections have progressively emerged over the past few decades as an increasing cause of human disease, especially in the immunocompromised host. Control of fungal disease has proved difficult because few risk factors are potentially preventable; the population at highest risk for fungal disease, the immunocompromised patient, has been steadily increasing. There is a clear need for additional safe and effective therapeutic agents for the treatment of systemic fungal disease. A new generation of triazoles that includes voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole and albaconazole has emerged and are presently in different phases of clinical investigation. These new triazoles have demonstrated a broad spectrum of activity, in particular against fungal pathogens previously resistant to previously available antifungals. This review highlights the emerging azole antifungals, both those available and in clinical development, and discusses their prospects for the future.

Itraconazole in the treatment of acute and recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis: comparison of a 1-day and a 3-day regimen

Itraconazole is a systemic triazole with a broad-spectrum antifungal effect which belongs to a standard choice for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidosis. Thirty-four patients with acute and 26 patients with recurrent form of culture documented attacks of vulvovaginal candidosis were evaluated. There was frequent discrepancy between severe symptoms and weaker signs in patients with recurrent form than in the group with acute sporadic form. Eighteen patients with the acute form and 13 patients with the recurrent form of vulvovaginal candidosis received 1-day therapy (twice 200 mg of itraconazole in 1 day). Sixteen patients with the acute form and 13 patients with the recurrent form received 3-day therapy (200 mg of itraconazole daily for three following days). The cure rates 1 month after treatment were 97.1 and 76.9% in patients with the acute sporadic and recurrent form of vulvovaginal candidosis, respectively. Positive cultures in the latter group documented relapses. These clinical failures were not related to the resistance of yeasts to itraconazole. With the exception of one case of alopecia areata, side effects were minimal. The application of the long-term regimens and suppressive therapy with azole drugs is suggested in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis.

Clinical and mycological efficacy of single-day oral treatment with itraconazole (400 mg) in acute vulvovaginal candidosis. Klinische und mykologische Wirksamkeit der Eintages-Oralbehandlung mit Itraconazol (400 mg) bei akuter Vulvovaginal-candidose

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of single-day oral treatment with itraconazole in acute vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC). Vaginitis was demonstrated by both detection of yeast cells and pseudohyphae formation on microscopic examination of vaginal discharge and mycological culture as well as by the clinical signs and symptoms. Clinical and mycological examinations of the 52 patients were performed before, 1 week (short-term) and 4 weeks (long-term) after single-day oral treatment with itraconazole 200 mg b.i.d. The causative yeast fungi were: Candida albicans (76.9%), C. glabrata (9.6%), C. kefyr (9.6%) and C. krusei (3.9%), respectively. In short- and long-term examinations, clinical cure rates were found to be 61.5% and 90.4%, and mycological cure rates were 63.5% and 90.4%, respectively. Itraconazole was found to be 95.0% effective with C. albicans and 75.0% with other Candida species. It is concluded that treatment of acute VVC with itraconazole is safe and effective in the long-term.

Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal agents for the treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush): a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety of oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatments for uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush) and establish patient preference for the route of anti-fungal administration.

DESIGN

A systematic review of studies comparing oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatments for uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. Standard Cochrane Collaboration methods were used.

DATA SOURCES

The following sources were searched: the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register; the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Disease review group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials; EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2000); and MEDLINE (January 1985 to May 2000). The reference list of each trial was checked for additional references. The manufacturers of anti-fungal treatments in the UK were asked for information on trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria.

METHODS

There was duplicate, independent examination and selection of the electronic search results followed by duplicate data abstraction. Disagreements regarding inclusion status and data abstraction were resolved by discussion between reviewers and the editor of the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Disease group. Randomised controlled trials conducted worldwide and published in any language were included. The primary outcome measure was clinical cure. Mycological cure, patient preference and safety were secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials were included in the review, reporting 19 oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment comparisons. No statistically significant differences were shown between oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment for clinical or mycological cure. All 10 trials that reported a preference favoured oral treatment (compared with intra-vaginal or no preference). No trials presented cost data.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference between the relativeeffectiveness of oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment for thrush.

Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

BACKGROUND

Anti-fungals are available for oral and intra-vaginal treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush).

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to assess the relative effectiveness of oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungals for the treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. The secondary objectives of the review were to assess the cost-effectiveness, safety and patient preference of oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungals.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following sources were searched: The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 1999), MEDLINE (January 1985 to May 2000), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2000) and the Cochrane Collaboration Sexually Transmitted Disease Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials. The reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed manually. The manufacturers of anti-fungals available in the UK were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

~Bullet~Randomised controlled trials published in any language. ~Bullet~Trials had to compare at least one oral anti-fungal with one intra-vaginal anti-fungal. ~Bullet~Women (aged 16 years or over) with uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis. ~Bullet~The diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis to be made mycologically (i.e. a positive culture and / or microscopy for yeast). ~Bullet~Trials were excluded if they solely involved subjects who were HIV positive, immunocompromised, pregnant, breastfeeding or diabetic. ~Bullet~The primary outcome measure was clinical cure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Duplicate scrutiny was performed of the titles and abstracts of the electronic search results. Full article formats of all selected abstracts were retrieved and independently assessed by two reviewers. Independent duplicate abstraction was performed by four reviewers. Disagreements regarding trial inclusion or data abstraction were resolved by discussion between the reviewers. Odds ratios were pooled using the random effects model. Chi-squared tests with a p-value of less than 0.1 indicated heterogeneity in the results.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen trials are included in the review, reporting 19 oral versus intra-vaginal anti-fungal comparisons. No statistically significant differences were shown between oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungal treatment for clinical cure at short term (OR 1.00 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.40)) and long term (OR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.49)) follow-up. No statistically significant differences for mycological cure were observed between oral and intra-vaginal treatment at short term (OR 1.20(95% CI, 0.87 to 1.65)) or long term follow-up (OR 1.30 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.71)). Two trials each reported one withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse reaction. Treatment preference data were poorly reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

No differences exist in terms of the relative effectiveness (measured as clinical and mycological cure) of anti-fungals administered by the oral and intra-vaginal routes for the treatment of uncomplicated vaginal candidiasis. No definitive conclusion can be made regarding the relative safety of oral and intra-vaginal anti-fungals for uncomplicated vaginal candidiasis. The oral route of administration is the preferred route for anti-fungals for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. The decision to prescribe or recommend the purchase of an anti-fungal for oral or intra-vaginal administration should take into consideration: safety, cost and treatment preference. Unless there is a previous history of adverse reaction to one route of administration or contraindications: if women are purchasing their own treatment, they should be given full information about the characteristics and costs of treatment to make their own decision. If health services are paying the treatment cost, decision-makers should consider whether the higher cost of oral anti-fungal administration is worth the gain in convenience, if this is the patient's preference.

Double-blind randomized dose-finding study in acute vulvovaginal candidosis. Comparison of flutrimazole site-release cream (1, 2 and 4%) with placebo site-release vaginal cream

A double-blind randomized comparative phase II study of flutrimazole site-release vaginal cream (1, 2 and 4%) with placebo site-release vaginal cream was undertaken in patients with acute vulvovaginal candidosis. Vaginitis was demonstrated by both positive findings on microscopic examination of vaginal smears and positive culture as well as by the presence of clinical signs and symptoms. The vaginal monodose treatment was inserted in the evening at bedtime using a vaginal applicator and, in addition, all four groups of patients received additional topical external cream for application to the vulva twice-daily for 7 days; the placebo group received a placebo cream and the active therapy groups all received a 2% flutrimazole cream. A total of 133 patients who were seen over a 10-month period were screened and randomized: five patients did not take the allocated medication, and four patients whose menstrual period began shortly after study entry were excluded from the study, leaving 124 patients who were randomly allocated to receive a monodose vaginal 1% cream (regimen A, 28 patients), a monodose vaginal 2% cream (regimen B, 32 patients), a monodose vaginal 4% cream (regimen C, 31 patients) or a monodose vaginal placebo cream (regimen D, 33 patients). At the assessment 9 days after the end of therapy the proportion of patients who were cured was 82% in group A, 87.4% in group B, 83.8% in group C and 63.5% in group D. Three patients (10.7%) in group A, four (12.5%) in group B, one (3.2%) in group C and 12 (36.36%) in group D did not respond to the treatment. One patient (3.5%) in group A, and two patients (6.4%) in group C terminated the treatment prematurely due to intolerance. There was a significant association between Candida glabrata and treatment failure (P < 0.04) and C. glabrata and carrier state (P = 0.01) in vagina (chi 2 test, P = 0.01) and vulvovagina (chi 2 test, P = 0.00001). At the assessment 4 weeks after the end of therapy the proportion of cured patients was 60.6% in group A, 78% in group B, 80.6% in group C and 48.4% in group D. Group D (placebo) versus group B (2%) and group C (4%) showed a significant difference (P = 0.01 and P = 0.007, respectively). Although there were no significant differences in clinical and mycological activity between the three active groups, group B (flutrimazole 2% site-release vaginal cream) was chosen for clinical use due to its tolerance profile. Seven patients (25%) in group A, three (9.3%) in group B, two (6.4%) in group C and five (15.1%) in group D relapsed 4 weeks after the end of therapy; the relapse rate was not significantly associated with positive culture results 9 days after treatment. There was a significant association between C. glabrata and the carrier state (P < 0.01). The overall ineffective treatment (includes failures at control 1, relapses at control 2 and premature terminations) was 39% in group A, 21.7% in group B, 16% in group C and 51.3% in group D. There was a significant difference in the overall ineffective treatment when C and D groups were compared with placebo (P = 0.01 and P = 0.003, respectively).

Itraconazole

Itraconazole is a broad spectrum triazole antifungal agent. It has favourable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles and is available as both oral and i.v. formulations. Over the last two decades, clinical and animal infection studies have demonstrated the efficacy of itraconazole in a wide range of superficial fungal infections including difficult-to-treat dermatophytoses and onychomycoses. Furthermore, shortened treatment regimens have proven to be effective, ranging from 1-day treatment for vaginal candidosis to 1-week pulse therapy per month, for 2-4 months, in onychomycosis and follicular dermatophytosis. Clinical experience with itraconazole in the treatment of deep mycoses is less comprehensive. However, results in systemic candidosis, sporotrichosis, blastomycosis, paracoccidioiodomycosis, certain types of histoplasmosis and aspergillosis are extremely encouraging. Itraconazole is less effective in the treatment of chromomycosis and coccidioidomycosis. Nevertheless, considering the refractory nature of these diseases, itraconazole has proven to be a valuable addition to the antifungal drugs currently available for treatment. Itraconazole has been well-tolerated with doses of up to 400 mg/day being generally free of serious adverse effects. However, a potential for drug interactions exists, mediated through the cytochrome P450 enzyme 3A4 system, which should be considered when itraconazole is used as part of a multi-drug regimen.

Current and emerging azole antifungal agents

Major developments in research into the azole class of antifungal agents during the 1990s have provided expanded options for the treatment of many opportunistic and endemic fungal infections. Fluconazole and itraconazole have proved to be safer than both amphotericin B and ketoconazole. Despite these advances, serious fungal infections remain difficult to treat, and resistance to the available drugs is emerging. This review describes present and future uses of the currently available azole antifungal agents in the treatment of systemic and superficial fungal infections and provides a brief overview of the current status of in vitro susceptibility testing and the growing problem of clinical resistance to the azoles. Use of the currently available azoles in combination with other antifungal agents with different mechanisms of action is likely to provide enhanced efficacy. Detailed information on some of the second-generation triazoles being developed to provide extended coverage of opportunistic, endemic, and emerging fungal pathogens, as well as those in which resistance to older agents is becoming problematic, is provided.

Antifungal agents. Part II. The azoles

Before 1978, amphotericin B and flucytosine were the only drugs available for the treatment of systemic fungal infections. The imidazoles, miconazole and ketoconazole, were introduced during the next 3 years. Intravenously administered miconazole served a limited therapeutic role and is no longer available. Orally administered ketoconazole, an inexpensive, effective, and convenient option for treating mucosal candidiasis, was widely used for a decade because it was the only available oral therapy for systemic fungal infections. During the 1990s, use of ketoconazole diminished because of the release of the triazoles--fluconazole and itraconazole. Fluconazole is less toxic and has several pharmacologic advantages over ketoconazole, including penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid. In addition, it has superior efficacy against systemic candidiasis, cryptococcosis, and coccidioidomycosis. Despite a myriad of drug interactions and less favorable pharmacologic and toxicity profiles in comparison with fluconazole, itraconazole has become a valuable addition to the antifungal armamentarium. It has excellent activity against sporotrichosis and seems promising in the treatment of aspergillosis. Itraconazole has replaced ketoconazole as the therapy of choice for nonmeningeal, non-life-threatening cases of histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, and paracoccidioidomycosis and is effective in patients with cryptococcosis and coccidioidomycosis, including those with meningitis. Further investigation into the development of new antifungal agents is ongoing.

Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance

In the past decade, the frequency of diagnosed fungal infections has risen sharply due to several factors, including the increase in the number of immunosuppressed patients resulting from the AIDS epidemic and treatments during and after organ and bone marrow transplants. Linked with the increase in fungal infections is a recent increase in the frequency with which these infections are recalcitrant to standard antifungal therapy. This review summarizes the factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance on three levels: (i) clinical factors that result in the inability to successfully treat refractory disease; (ii) cellular factors associated with a resistant fungal strain; and (iii) molecular factors that are ultimately responsible for the resistance phenotype in the cell. Many of the clinical factors that contribute to resistance are associated with the immune status of the patient, with the pharmacology of the drugs, or with the degree or type of fungal infection present. At a cellular level, antifungal drug resistance can be the result of replacement of a susceptible strain with a more resistant strain or species or the alteration of an endogenous strain (by mutation or gene expression) to a resistant phenotype. The molecular mechanisms of resistance that have been identified to date in Candida albicans include overexpression of two types of efflux pumps, overexpression or mutation of the target enzyme, and alteration of other enzymes in the same biosynthetic pathway as the target enzyme. Since the study of antifungal drug resistance is relatively new, other factors that may also contribute to resistance are discussed.

Prevention of recurrent vaginal candidiasis with weekly terconazole cream

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prophylactic use of weekly terconazole 0.8% cream to prevent recurrent episodes of candidal vaginitis.

DESIGN

Women with a documented history of recurrent candidal vaginitis (> or = 4 recurrences/y) were enrolled into a secondary prevention trial. None of these women were HIV positive, pregnant, diabetic, or immunosuppressed. Patients were initially treated for a symptomatic episode of candidal vaginitis and then started on weekly applications of terconazole 0.8% cream for 26 weeks. These women were then followed for an additional 26 weeks after therapy.

SETTING

A university-affiliated medical school.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population consisted of 22 healthy women aged 19-41 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were interviewed by phone each week concerning symptoms and compliance. They were also reminded to notify the study investigators any time vaginal symptoms of candidiasis occurred. Patients were examined whenever they developed vaginal symptoms and were treated on the basis of microscopic and culture results.

RESULTS

Ten patients had 14 symptomatic cases of vaginitis during the prophylactic phase of the study, but Candida spp. were isolated during only 4 of these episodes. One episode was due to bacterial vaginosis and no pathogenic organisms were found in 9 of these cases. Eighteen of the 20 patients who completed the prophylactic phase were followed after therapy and 14 (78%) of these patients had a current case of candidal vaginitis. This incidence of infection was statistically higher than that observed during the treatment period (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly applications of terconazole 0.8% cream were effective in preventing recurrent episodes of candidal vaginitis and were well tolerated.

Itraconazole. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of superficial fungal infections

Itraconazole is an orally administered triazole antifungal agent. Its spectrum of activity includes dermatophyte, dimorphic and dematiaceous fungi, yeasts, and some moulds. In clinical trials, mycological cure was attained in approximately 70 to 80, > or = 70 and > or = 80% of patients with, respectively, fingernail and toenail onychomycosis (200 mg/day for 3 months), dermatophytosis (100 mg/day for 2 to 4 weeks) and vaginal candidiasis (400 mg/day for 1 day or 200 mg/day for 3 days). Approximately 20 to 30% of patients with onychomycosis may relapse after completion of therapy; relapse rate data are limited for the other indications. Recently developed intermittent regimens of itraconazole (400 mg/day for 1 week per month for 3 to 4 months) appear to have similar efficacy to standard regimens in the treatment of onychomycosis. Shorter, higher dosage itraconazole treatment regimens (200 or 400 mg/day for 1 week) are also beneficial in dermatomycoses. Discrepancies and limitations of study design hamper conclusions about efficacy relative to other antifungal drugs. Newer intermittent and short course higher dosage itraconazole regimens have also not been evaluated in comparative studies. Available studies show that the efficacy of itraconazole appears to be greater than that of griseofulvin, but similar to or lower than that of terbinafine in patients with dermatophyte onychomycosis or cutaneous fungal infections. Moreover, the efficacy of itraconazole may be similar to or lower than that of fluconazole in the treatment of cutaneous mycoses. Comparative data from patients with acute vaginal candidiasis suggest that itraconazole is at least as effective as intravaginal clotrimazole and oral fluconazole, and superior to intravaginal econazole. These results require confirmation. Prescription-event monitoring data indicate that itraconazole is generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal disturbances, dizziness and headache occur most commonly; liver toxicity has been rarely described. Its usefulness in some clinical situations may be limited because of its ability to interact with various therapeutic agents. In conclusion, itraconazole along with other established agents should be considered a first-line treatment for patients with extensive or recalcitrant cutaneous fungal infections, mixed dermatophyte and Candida onychomycosis or vaginal candidiasis. It is currently considered a second-line drug for dermatophyte onychomycosis; the use of newer intermittent itraconazole treatment regimens may, however, extend its role in the management of this condition. Although itraconazole offers greater benefit than conventional therapies (griseofulvin and ketoconazole) in terms of efficacy and tolerability, wider clinical experience is required to determine its merits relative to the newer agents, terbinafine and fluconazole.

Short-course itraconazole in the treatment of candida vulvovaginitis: A multicentre Canadian study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical and mycological effectiveness of oral itraconazole in the treatment of acute candida vulvovaginitis.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized and single-blinded, multicentre trial of 221 women, comparing a one-day course of oral itraconazole 200 mg bid with vaginal clotrimazole 500 mg single-dose therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptoms, signs and mycological results were assessed up to two months following treatment. Adverse events were recorded and evidence of hepatotoxicity sought.

RESULTS

At 10 and 30 days post-treatment, clinical and mycological cure rates were similar (61.3% clinical and 88.6% mycological 10 days after, and 67.7% clinical and 79.5 mycological 30 days after itraconazole; 64.0 clinical and 85.9% mycological 10 days after, and 62.1% clinical and 78.6 mycological 30 days after clotrimazole) with the majority of both treatment groups free from infection. A total of 69 patients reported adverse events, which were generally transient and mild. Itraconazole was more often associated with gastrointestinal or central nervous system complaints, while clotrimazole recipients more often had genitourinary symptoms. No evidence of hepatotoxicity was found. A higher incidence of relapse was noted among women on the birth control pill and among those who were symptomatic for longer than 10 days before treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A one-day course of oral itraconazole is as effective as intravaginal clotrimazole in the treatment of acute yeast vulvovaginitis. The number of patients reporting adverse events was similar for the treatment groups, although the side effect profile differed. No hepatotoxicity was observed.

Identification, classification, and clinical relevance of catalase-negative, gram-positive cocci, excluding the streptococci and enterococci

Several new genera and species of gram-positive, catalase-negative cocci that can cause infections in humans have been described. Although these bacteria were isolated in the clinical laboratory, they were considered nonpathogenic culture contaminants and were not thought to be the cause of any diseases. Isolation of pure cultures of these bacteria from normally sterile sites has led to the conclusion that these bacteria can be an infrequent cause of infection. This review describes the new bacteria and the procedures useful for clinical laboratories to aid in their identification. The clinical relevance and our experience with the various genera and species are reviewed and discussed.

Antifungal agents: an overview. Part II

The recent introduction of a new generation of antifungal drugs promises to alter significantly therapy for both systemic and superficial mycoses, in particular, onychomycosis. This article presents an in-depth review of the azoles (the triazoles itraconazole and fluconazole), the allylamines (naftifine and terbinafine), and the morpholine derivative amorolfine.