Activity of clinafloxacin against multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci

After they were first identified in the mid-1980s, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) spread rapidly and became a major problem in many institutions both in Europe and the United States. Since VRE have intrinsic resistance to most of the commonly used antibiotics and the ability to acquire resistance to most of the current available antibiotics, either by mutation or by receipt of foreign genetic material, they have a selective advantage over other microorganisms in the intestinal flora and pose a major therapeutic challenge. The possibility of transfer of vancomycin resistance genes to other gram-positive organisms raises significant concerns about the emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We review VRE, including their history, mechanisms of resistance, epidemiology, control measures, and treatment.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci

After they were first identified in the mid-1980s, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) spread rapidly and became a major problem in many institutions both in Europe and the United States. Since VRE have intrinsic resistance to most of the commonly used antibiotics and the ability to acquire resistance to most of the current available antibiotics, either by mutation or by receipt of foreign genetic material, they have a selective advantage over other microorganisms in the intestinal flora and pose a major therapeutic challenge. The possibility of transfer of vancomycin resistance genes to other gram-positive organisms raises significant concerns about the emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We review VRE, including their history, mechanisms of resistance, epidemiology, control measures, and treatment.

Successful treatment of persistent bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant, ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci has become an increasing problem in many medical centers. We report a liver transplant recipient with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia who was successfully treated using very high dose continuous infusion ampicillin/sulbactam, plus gentamicin after he remained bacteremic on high dose ampicillin and gentamicin. At our institution, 83% of E. faecium isolates from 1994 were inhibited by ampicillin/sulbactam compared to 66% for ampicillin at an MIC < or = 64 micrograms/ml. None of these strains produced beta-lactamase, suggesting sulbactam may have an unexplained beneficial effect against some enterococci. Although an MIC of < or = 8 micrograms/ml is required for ampicillin to be considered active against enterococci, much higher levels of ampicillin or ampicillin/sulbactam are safely achievable. The response of our patient and the reported in vivo data have implications for future treatment of this pathogen, and may necessitate a reevaluation of susceptibility interpretation guidelines by clinical laboratories, and therapeutic drug dosing by clinicians.

In vitro activities of an investigational quinolone, glycylcycline, glycopeptide, streptogramin, and oxazolidinone tested alone and in combinations against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

We evaluated the in vitro activities of clinafloxacin, CL331,002, LY333328, quinupristin dalfopristin, and eperezolid (formerly known as U-100,592) against four strains of enterococci. All regimens tested resulted in the growth inhibition of each isolate. Against the three clinafloxacin-susceptible strains, clinafloxacin tested alone was the most active treatment, decreasing the bacterial inoculum by more than 3 log10 CFU/ml after 24 h in time-kill curve studies.

Advances in medical and antibiotic management of infective endocarditis

Infective endocarditis remains a serious medical problem despite advancements in laboratory detection, echocardiographic techniques, and newer antibiotic agents. This article summarizes the microbial agents in infective endocarditis, in addition to developments in medical and antibiotic management.

Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance

In the last 5 years, clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria with intrinsic or acquired resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics have been encountered increasingly. In many of these isolates, resistance arises from an alteration of the antibiotic target site, with the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine moiety of peptidoglycan precursors being replaced by groups that do not bind glycopeptides. Although the criteria for defining resistance have been revised frequently, the reliable detection of low-level glycopeptide resistance remains problematic and is influenced by the method chosen. Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci have emerged as a particular problem in hospitals, where in addition to sporadic cases, clusters of infections with evidence of interpatient spread have occurred. Studies using molecular typing methods have implicated colonization of patients, staff carriage, and environmental contamination in the dissemination of these bacteria. Choice of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant bacteria may be complicated by resistance to other antibiotics. Severe therapeutic difficulties are being encountered among patients infected with enterococci, with some infections being untreatable with currently available antibiotics.

In vitro and in vivo activities of clinafloxacin, CI-990 (PD 131112), and PD 138312 versus enterococci

Certain new fluoroquinolones have high activity against enterococci. Against Enterococcus faecalis (n = 18), MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited were as follows (in micrograms per milliliter): clinafloxacin, 0.125; CI-990, 0.5; and PD 138312, 0.25 (compared with 1 microgram/ml for ciprofloxacin and 2 micrograms/ml for ofloxacin). Strains producing beta-lactamase or that were vancomycin resistant or resistant to high-level gentamicin were not quinolone cross-resistant. The drugs were bactericidal and were unaffected by 50% human serum. Oral efficacies (in milligrams per kilogram of body weight for 50% protective doses) in lethal mouse infections with quinolone-susceptible strains were 4.3 to 24 for clinafloxacin, 7.2 to 39 for CI-990, 7.2 to 76 for PD 138312, and 41 to > 100 for ciprofloxacin; when the drugs were given subcutaneously, the order was similar and values ranged from 1.1 to 12.5. Clinafloxacin, CI-990, and PD 138312 may have therapeutic potential in systemic enterococcal infections in humans.

Comparison of the in vitro activity of levofloxacin and other antimicrobial agents against vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species

The in vitro activities of levofloxacin and other antibiotics against 133 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci were evaluated. Only 14 (39%) of the vancomycin-susceptible isolates and 11 (11%) of the vancomycin-resistant isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin. Levofloxacin exhibited a marked inoculum effect for all enterococci tested. These results suggest that levofloxacin may be of limited use in the treatment of serious enterococcal infections.

Susceptibility of ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci and enterococci to clinafloxacin

Clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterococcus faecalis obtained from the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center within the last decade were tested for susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. For MRSA isolates, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ciprofloxacin were several fold higher than those noted with clinafloxacin. Prior to the introduction of the fluoroquinolones (1984-1985), all MRSA isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. By 1993, virtually all MRSA isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin and a 50-fold increase in the MIC50 and MIC90 for clinafloxacin was seen. In 1985-1986, most enterococcal isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. By 1993, one-third of all enterococci were resistant to both ciprofloxacin and clinafloxacin. Fluoroquinolone resistance developed more quickly in enterococci that demonstrated high-level gentamicin resistance. Thus, cross-resistance between clinafloxacin and ciprofloxacin was seen; however, the lower MICs of clinafloxacin for MRSA may allow the use of this drug for some MRSA infections.