Comparative in vitro activities of azithromycin, Bay y 3118, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and 11 other oral antimicrobial agents against 194 aerobic and anaerobic bite wound isolates

Severe forefoot infection complicated by Fusobacterium russii

We present the first case of a complicated foot infection caused by Fusobacterium russii in Austria. F. russii is highly associated with mammals such as cats and dogs. Our case underlines the difficulties in isolation and identification of anaerobes and the pitfalls in antimicrobial treatment of polymicrobial infections.

Postoperative care of the facial laceration

The purpose of this investigation is to examine factors involved in the postoperative care of traumatic lacerations. An evidence-based comprehensive literature review was conducted. There are a limited number of scientifically proven studies that guide surgeons and emergency room physicians on postoperative care. Randomized controlled trials must be conducted to further standardize the postoperative protocol for simple facial lacerations.

Recommendations and rationale for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is one of the most common serious infections of nonpregnant women of reproductive age. Management of PID is directed at containment of infection. Goals of therapy include the resolution of clinical symptoms and signs, the eradication of pathogens from the genital tract and the prevention of sequelae including infertility, ectopic pregnancy and chronic pelvic pain. The choice of an antibiotic regimen used to treat PID relies upon the appreciation of the polymicrobial etiology of this ascending infection including Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium and other lower genital tract endogenous anaerobic and facultative bacteria, many of which are associated with bacterial vaginosis. Currently available evidence and the CDC treatment recommendations support the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens that adequately cover the above named microorganisms. The outpatient treatment of mild-to-moderate PID should include tolerated antibiotic regimens consisting of an extended-spectrum cephalosporin in conjunction with either azithromycin or doxycycline. Clinically severe PID should prompt hospitalization and imaging to rule out a tubo-ovarian abscess. Parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy with activity against a polymicrobial flora, particularly Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes, should be implemented.

Pelvic inflammatory disease

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an infection-caused inflammatory continuum from the cervix to the peritoneal cavity. Most importantly, it is associated with fallopian tube inflammation, which can lead to infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain. The microbial etiology is linked to sexually transmitted microorganisms, including Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrheae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and bacterial vaginosis-associated microorganisms, predominantly anaerobes. Pelvic pain and fever are commonly absent in women with confirmed PID. Clinicians should consider milder symptoms such as abnormal vaginal discharge, metrorrhagia, postcoital bleeding, and urinary frequency as potential symptoms associated with the disease, particularly in women at risk of sexually transmitted infection. The diagnosis of PID is based on the findings of lower genital tract inflammation associated with pelvic organ tenderness. The outpatient treatment of mild-to-moderate PID should include tolerated antibiotic regimens with activity against the commonly isolated microorganisms associated with PID and usually consists of an extended spectrum cephalosporin in conjunction with either doxycycline or azithromycin. Clinically severe PID should prompt hospitalization and imaging to rule out a tuboovarian abscess. Parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy with activity against a polymicrobial flora, particularly gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes, should be implemented. Screening for and treatment of Chlamydia infection can prevent PID.

Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), the infection and inflammation of the female upper genital tract, is a common cause of infertility, chronic pain and ectopic pregnancy. Diagnosis and management are challenging, largely resulting from varying signs and symptoms and a polymicrobial etiology that is not fully delineated. Owing to the potential for serious sequelae, a low threshold for diagnosis and treatment is recommended. As PID has a multimicrobial etiology, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydial trachomatis and anaerobic and mycoplasmal bacteria, treatment of PID should consist of a broad spectrum antibiotic regimen. Recent treatment trials have focused on shorter duration regimens, such as azithromycin, and monotherapies including ofloxacin, but data are sparse. Research comparing sequelae development by differing antimicrobial regimens is extremely limited, but will ultimately shape future treatment guidelines.

Pasteurella multocida infection of a total knee arthroplasty after a "dog lick"

The patient we report here underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) which got infected with P. multocida after her dog had licked a small wound at the third toe of the same foot. Despite a correct treatment comprising synovectomy and cleansing, and an active antibiotic treatment for 3 months, the patient was readmitted for persistent infection of the same knee 2 weeks after the end of the antibiotic treatment. Sampling during surgery allowed for the growth of a P. multocida isolate proven by a molecular method to be identical to the previously isolated strain. This recurrent P. multocida infection was treated by a two-step change of the TKA comprising a 2-month period of antibiotic treatment between the two surgical interventions.

Epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease

Pelvic inflammatory disease, the infection and inflammation of the female upper genital tract, is a common cause of infertility, chronic pain and ectopic pregnancy. Diagnosis and management are challenging, due largely to a polymicrobial etiology which is not fully delineated. Signs and symptoms of this syndrome vary widely, further complicating diagnosis and treatment. Due to the potential for serious sequelae, a low threshold for diagnosis and treatment is recommended. Since pelvic inflammatory disease has a multimicrobial etiology including Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and anaerobic and mycoplasmal bacteria, treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease should be broad spectrum. Recent treatment trials have focused on shorter duration regimens such as azithromycin and monotherapies including ofloxacin, although data are sparse. Research comparing sequelae development by differing antimicrobial regimens is extremely limited, but will ultimately shape future treatment guidelines. Several promising short-duration and monotherapy antibiotic regimens should be evaluated in pelvic inflammatory disease treatment trials for compliance, microbiological and clinical cure, and reduction of subsequent adverse reproductive and gynecological morbidity.

Prophylaxis with cefazolin plus clindamycin in clean-contaminated maxillofacial surgery

PURPOSE

Infections after maxillofacial surgery are usually due to aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli. Various antimicrobials, including cephalosporins, beta-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, and fluoroquinolones, have been tested for use for perioperative prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery. However, the best regimen has not been determined. We tested the safety and the efficacy of clindamycin plus cefazolin as perioperative prophylaxis for patients undergoing major maxillofacial procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Intravenous cefazolin and clindamycin in 3 doses were administered to 155 patients undergoing major maxillofacial procedures. After surgery, patients were monitored for the presence of infection and side effects.

RESULTS

No patient experienced a fever or infection after surgery. No side effects related to these antibiotics were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The antibiotics used as prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery should possess an adequate coverage against gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic cocci as well as gram-negative bacilli. Prophylaxis with cefazolin plus clindamycin in major maxillofacial seems safe and effective.

Low risk of infection in selected human bites treated without antibiotics

To assess the need for antibiotics in low-risk human bite wounds, a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 127 patients presenting with low-risk human bite wounds over 2 years to a 40,000 visit per year major academic ED was performed. Low-risk bites penetrated only the epidermis and did not involve hands, feet, skin, overlying joints, or cartilaginous structures. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, puncture wounds, immunocompromise, allergy to penicillin or related compound, or bites greater than 24 hours old. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a cephalexin/penicillin combination or placebo. One hundred twenty-five patients completed the study. Infection developed in 1 of 62 patients receiving placebo (1.6%, 95% confidence interval CI, 0-7.3%). Infection developed in 0 of 63 patients receiving the cephalexin/penicillin combination (0%, 95% CI, 0-4.6%). Antibiotic treatment of some low-risk human bite wound could be unnecessary. Infection rates appear similar in low-risk human bite wounds whether treated with antibiotics or placebo.

International guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: the role of macrolides

The significance of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has led to the publication of guidelines from numerous international organisations. Because the macrolide class of antimicrobials is active against most of the key pathogens associated with CAP, agents from this class are commonly included in recommendations from these guidelines. However, there are differences among the various guidelines concerning the positioning of the macrolides for empirical therapy. An important factor concerning the use of macrolides for CAP is the emergence of resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae over the past decade. The rate of S. pneumoniae resistance to macrolides ranges from 4 to 70% of strains in worldwide surveillance studies. The most common mechanisms of resistance include methylation of a ribosomal target encoded by the erm gene and efflux of the macrolides by a cell membrane protein transporter, encoded by the mef gene. S. pneumoniae strains with the mef gene are resistant at a lower level (with minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] values generally 1-16 microg/ml) than erm resistant strains; and it is possible that such strains may be inhibited if sufficiently high levels of macrolide can be obtained at the infected site. Currently mef-associated resistance predominates in North America, whereas erm predominates in Europe. Until recently, reports of failure of treatment of CAP with macrolides has been rare, particularly for patients with low-risk for drug-resistant strains. However, since 2000, several patients treated with an oral macrolide who have subsequently required admission to the hospital for macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae (MRSP) bacteraemia have been reported in the literature. Major issues, which are fundamental to the use of the macrolides as recommended in the various guidelines, include the importance of providing therapy for 'atypical' pathogens and the clinical significance of MRSP. Presently, the macrolides are more prominently recommended in the North American guidelines than in other parts of the world. The difference in the emphasis placed on the importance of the atypical pathogens as well as the expression of MRSP in North America compared with Europe partly explains this variance.

Review of the in vitro activity and potential clinical efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of anaerobic infections

The activity of levofloxacin against aerobic bacteria has been well documented both in vitro and clinically, but its anaerobic activity has been infrequently studied. This new fluoroquinolone exhibits good in vitro activity (MIC(S) < or =2.0 microg/mL) against many anaerobic pathogens associated with acute sinusitis, bite wounds, and other soft-tissue infections. It is less active against Bacteroides fragilis (MIC (90)=2-4 microg/mL ) and has poor inhibitory activity against non-fragilis B. fragilis group species that are associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract infections. Levofloxacin does not antagonize the in vitro activity of clindamycin and metronidazole and often provides additive or synergistic activity against anaerobic bacteria with these agents. In pharmacodynamic models, levofloxacin exhibits rapid bactericidal activity at 2-4 times the MIC of anaerobic bacteria. Prolonged killing is observed when the area-under-the concentration-time-curve to MIC ratio is greater than 40. In clinical efficacy trials, levofloxacin has been effective in the treatment of patients with gynecologic, skin and skin-structure, and bone infections involving anaerobic pathogens. Both micro-biologic and pharmacodynamic studies support further evaluations of levofloxacin in the treatment of selective mixed aerobic/anaerobic infections.

Penetration of levofloxacin into skin tissue after oral administration of multiple 750 mg once-daily doses

OBJECTIVE

To probe the pharmacokinetic basis for the use of levofloxacin for complicated skin and skin-structure infections (SSSIs) at a once-daily dosage of 750 mg by investigating its penetration into skin tissue.

METHOD

Ten healthy volunteers were administered three oral, once-daily 750 mg doses of levofloxacin, and levofloxacin concentrations were subsequently measured over time (0.5-24 h) in skin-punch biopsy tissue and plasma.

RESULTS

Skin tissue concentrations consistently exceeded those in plasma at every time point, with tissue/plasma ratios of 1.37 +/- 0.81 for peak concentration and 1.97 +/- 0.35 for area under the concentration versus time curve. Three of the ten subjects reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) that were considered unrelated to treatment. An 11th subject who had enrolled in the study withdrew after AEs of mild severity that were possibly related to the study drug.

CONCLUSION

The results support the clinical usage of levofloxacin 750 mg once-daily for complicated SSSIs.

[Comparative study of the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against Pasteurella strains isolated from man]

The MICs of seven quinolones, nalidixic acid, pefloxacin, ofloxacin, d-ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin and levofloxacin, were determined by agar dilution method comparatively to those of amoxycillin, cefpodoxime, doxycyclin and clarithromycin against 75 clinical isolates of Pasteurella multocida, P. dagmatis and P. canis. Time-kill method was performed for three selected P. multocida isolates. Fluoroquinolones were the most active agents. At concentration of 0.016 mg/L of sparfloxacin or levofloxacin the 75 isolates were inhibited. The MICs of levofloxacin and sparfloxacin showed that the activity of these molecules was two to four times higher than that of the other quinolones studied. Time-kill studies showed a complete killing in six hours with the CMI x 2 of pefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin and levofloxacin. This result was obtained more rapidly with the quinolones than with amoxicillin or cefpodoxime. Doxycycline and clarithromycin were devoid of bactericidal activity.

Is more than one quinolone needed in clinical practice?

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical information on fluoroquinolone antimicrobials to distinguish between these agents and help define their place in clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

Primary and review articles on fluoroquinolones available commercially in the US as of August 2000 were identified through MEDLINE (from 1993-August 2000) and secondary sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All pertinent, published, clinical trials for levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin were included. Minimal data were included for quinolones with restricted or limited uses, including trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, enoxacin, and lomefloxacin. Due to the quantity of data on ciprofloxacin, only more recent or pivotal trials or articles summarizing data on specific infections were included. Relevant information was included if it was believed to assist in differentiating between the fluoroquinolones for infections for which these agents would most commonly be considered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fluoroquinolones are a potent class of intravenous and oral broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents used for treating a wide range of community-acquired and nosocomial infections. More than 10 quinolones have been approved for use; although some of these have been withdrawn from the market, numerous others are under investigation. It has become increasingly important to be able to differentiate between these agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in safety, antimicrobial spectrum of activity, and resistance development support the selective use of various fluoroquinolones in differing clinical situations.

Anti-anaerobic activity of levofloxacin alone and combined with clindamycin and metronidazole

Microdilution MICs of levofloxacin against twelve anaerobes ranged between 0.5-8.0 microg/ml and those of clindamycin and metronidazole between 0.008-2.0 and 0.25->16.0 microg/ml, respectively. Combination of levofloxacin with clindamycin and/or metronidazole in time-kill tests led to synergy at levofloxacin concentrations at or below the MIC in 7/12 strains.

Comparative in vitro activities of GAR-936 against aerobic and anaerobic animal and human bite wound pathogens

GAR-936 is a new semisynthetic glycylcycline with a broad antibacterial spectrum, including tetracycline-resistant strains. The in vitro activities of GAR-936, minocycline, doxycycline, tetracycline, moxifloxacin, penicillin G, and erythromycin were determined by agar dilution methods against 268 aerobic and 148 anaerobic strains of bacteria (including Pasteurella, Eikenella, Moraxella, Bergeyella, Neisseria, EF-4, Bacteroides, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Fusobacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, Peptostreptococcus, and Actinomyces) isolated from infected human and animal bite wounds in humans, including strains resistant to commonly used antimicrobials. GAR-936 was very active, with an MIC at which 90% of the strains are inhibited (MIC(90)) of < or =0.25 microg/ml, against all aerobic gram-positive and -negative strains, including tetracycline-resistant strains of Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and coagulase-negative staphylococci, except for Eikenella corrodens (MIC(90), < or =4 microg/ml). GAR-936 was also very active against all anaerobic species, including tetracycline-, doxycycline-, and minocycline-resistant strains of Prevotella spp., Porphyromonas spp., Bacteroides tectum, and Peptostreptococcus spp., with an MIC(90) of < or =0.25 microg/ml. Erythromycin- and moxifloxacin-resistant fusobacteria were susceptible to GAR-936, with an MIC(90) of 0.06 microg/ml.

Treating mammalian bite wounds

The incidence of dog, cat and human bites has been increasing steadily and represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Approximately half of all Americans will suffer a bite wound during their lifetime, and the annual medical costs of managing these injuries has been estimated to be over $100 million. Possible complications may include disfigurement, dismemberment and infection. Effective management requires rapid medical evaluation and may necessitate surgical intervention and prophylactic antibiotic therapy. As bite wounds are microbiologically diverse and most often polymicrobial in nature, selection of an appropriate antibiotic regimen requires knowledge of common pathogens. Close clinical follow-up is recommended to minimize the risk of late complications.

Levofloxacin in the empirical treatment of patients with suspected bacteraemia/sepsis: comparison with imipenem/cilastatin in an open, randomized trial

An open, randomized, multinational, multicentre study was conducted to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of levofloxacin 500 mg twice daily with imipenem/cilastatin 1 g iv three-times daily in the treatment of hospitalized adult patients with clinically suspected bacteraemia/ sepsis. Levofloxacin patients could change from iv to oral administration after a minimum of 48 h iv treatment if clinical signs and symptoms of sepsis had improved. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the clinical and bacteriological response at clinical endpoint. A total of 503 patients were randomized and 499 included in the intent-to-treat population. The per-protocol population comprised 287 patients with bacteriologically proven infection. Clinical cure rates at clinical endpoint in the intent-to-treat population and per-protocol population were 77% (184/239) and 89% (125/140), respectively, for levofloxacin and 68% (178/260) and 85% (125/147), respectively, for imipenem/cilastatin. At follow-up, the cure rates in the per-protocol population were 84% for levofloxacin and 69% for imipenem/cilastatin. The 95% confidence interval for both populations showed that levofloxacin was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin. A satisfactory bacteriological response was obtained in 87% (96/110) of levofloxacin patients and 84% (97/116) of imipenem/cilastatin patients at clinical endpoint. Adverse events possibly related to the study drug were reported in 74 (31%) levofloxacin patients and 79 (30%) imipenem/cilastatin patients. There were no clinically appreciable differences between the treatment groups. Levofloxacin 500 mg twice daily, either iv or as sequential iv/oral therapy, was as effective and well tolerated as imipenem/cilastatin 1 g iv three-times daily in the treatment of hospitalized patients with suspected bacteraemia/sepsis.

The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin

In addition to erythromycin, macrolides now available in the United States include azithromycin and clarithromycin. These two new macrolides are more chemically stable and better tolerated than erythromycin, and they have a broader antimicrobial spectrum than erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Haemophilus influenzae, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis. All three macrolides have excellent activity against the atypical respiratory pathogens (C. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species) and the Legionella species. Azithromycin and clarithromycin have pharmacokinetics that allow shorter dosing schedules because of prolonged tissue levels. Both azithromycin and clarithromycin are active agents for MAC prophylaxis in patients with late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), although azithromycin may be the preferable agent because of fewer drug-drug interactions. Clarithromycin is the most active MAC antimicrobial agent and should be part of any drug regimen for treating active MAC disease in patients with or without AIDS. Although both azithromycin and clarithromycin are well tolerated by children, azithromycin has the advantage of shorter treatment regimens and improved tolerance, potentially improving compliance in the treatment of respiratory tract and skin or soft tissue infections. Intravenously administered azithromycin has been approved for treatment of adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases. An area of concern is the increasing macrolide resistance that is being reported with some of the common pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A streptococci, and H. influenzae. The emergence of macrolide resistance with these common pathogens may limit the clinical usefulness of this class of antimicrobial agents in the future.

Bacteriologic analysis of infected dog and cat bites. Emergency Medicine Animal Bite Infection Study Group

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

To define better the bacteria responsible for infections of dog and cat bites, we conducted a prospective study at 18 emergency departments. To be eligible for enrollment, patients had to meet one of three major criteria for infection of a bite wound (fever, abscess, and lymphangitis) or four of five minor criteria (wound-associated erythema, tenderness at the wound site, swelling at the site, purulent drainage, and leukocytosis). Wound specimens were cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria at a research microbiology laboratory and, in some cases, at local hospital laboratories.

RESULTS

The infected wounds of 50 patients with dog bites and 57 patients with cat bites yielded a median of 5 bacterial isolates per culture (range, 0 to 16) at the reference laboratory. Significantly more isolates grew at the reference laboratory than at the local laboratories (median, 1; range, 0 to 5; P<0.001). Aerobes and anaerobes were isolated from 56 percent of the wounds, aerobes alone from 36 percent, and anaerobes alone from 1 percent; 7 percent of cultures had no growth. Pasteurella species were the most frequent isolates from both dog bites (50 percent) and cat bites (75 percent). Pasteurella canis was the most common isolate of dog bites, and Past. multocida subspecies multocida and septica were the most common isolates of cat bites. Other common aerobes included streptococci, staphylococci, moraxella, and neisseria. Common anaerobes included fusobacterium, bacteroides, porphyromonas, and prevotella. Isolates not previously identified as human pathogens included Reimerella anatipestifer from two cat bites and Bacteroides tectum, Prevotella heparinolytica, and several porphyromonas species from dog and cat bites. Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae was isolated from two cat bites. Patients were most often treated with a combination of a beta-lactam antibiotic and a beta-lactamase inhibitor, which, on the basis of the microbiologic findings, was appropriate therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Infected dog and cat bites have a complex microbiologic mix that usually includes pasteurella species but may also include many other organisms not routinely identified by clinical microbiology laboratories and not previously recognized as bite-wound pathogens.

Levofloxacin. Its use in infections of the respiratory tract, skin, soft tissues and urinary tract

Levofloxacin, the optically pure levorotatory isomer of ofloxacin, is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. Like other fluoroquinolones, it acts on bacterial topoisomerase and has activity against a broad range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Levofloxacin also appears to have improved activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae compared with ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Levofloxacin distributes well and achieves high levels in excess of plasma concentrations in many tissues (e.g., lung, skin, prostate). High oral bioavailability allows switching from intravenous to oral therapy without dosage adjustment. In patients with mild to severe community-acquired pneumonia receiving treatment for 7 to 14 days, oral levofloxacin was similar in efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin was superior to intravenous ceftriaxone and/or oral cefuroxime axetil. With levofloxacin use, clinical success (clinical cure or improvement) rates were 87 to 96% and bacteriological eradication rates were 87 to 100%. In the 5- to 10-day treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, oral levofloxacin was similar in efficacy to oral cefuroxime axetil or cefaclor. Levofloxacin resulted in clinical success in 78 to 94.6% of patients and bacteriological eradication in 77 to 97%. Oral levofloxacin was also similar in efficacy to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or oral clarithromycin in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis treated for 7 to 14 days. Equivalence between 7- to 10-day therapy with oral levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin was seen in patients with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. Clinical success was seen in 97.8 and 96.1% of levofloxacin recipients and bacteriological eradication in 97.5 and 93.2%. Complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis, responded similarly well to oral levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin for 10 days or lomefloxacin for 14 days. Clinical success and bacteriological eradication rates with levofloxacin occurred in 92 to 93.3% and 93.6 to 94.7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin can be administered in a once-daily regimen as an alternative to other fluoroquinolones in the treatment of infections of the urinary tract, skin and soft tissues. Its more interesting use is as an alternative to established treatments of respiratory tract infections. S. pneumoniae appears to be more susceptible to levofloxacin than to ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Other newer fluoroquinolone agents that also have enhanced in vitro antipneumococcal activity may not share the well established tolerability profile of levofloxacin, which also appears to improve on that of some older fluoroquinolones.

Azithromycin. A review of its use in paediatric infectious diseases

Azithromycin is an azalide antimicrobial agent active in vitro against major pathogens responsible for infections of the respiratory tract, skin and soft tissues in children. Pathogens that are generally susceptible to azithromycin include Haemophilus influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella spp., Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae. Azithromycin is also generally active against erythromycin- and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Azithromycin is administered once daily, achieves clinically relevant concentrations at sites of infection, is slowly eliminated from the body and has few drug interactions. In children, azithromycin is usually given as either a 3-day course of 10 mg/kg/day or a 5-day course with 10 mg/kg on the first day, followed by 5 mg/kg/day for a further 4 days. These standard regimens were as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, cefaclor and amoxicillin in the treatment of children with otitis media. Azithromycin was also as effective as either phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V), erythromycin, clarithromycin or cefaclor against streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis in children, but appears to result in more recurrence of infection than phenoxymethylpenicillin in this indication, necessitating a dosage of 12 mg/kg/day for 5 days. Community-acquired pneumonia, bronchitis and other respiratory tract infections in children responded as well to azithromycin as to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefaclor, erythromycin or josamycin. Azithromycin was similar or superior to ceftibuten in mixed general practice populations of patients. However, symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections resolved more rapidly with azithromycin than with erythromycin, josamycin or cefaclor. Skin and soft tissue infections responded as well to azithromycin as to cefaclor, dicloxacillin or flucloxacillin, and oral azithromycin was as effective as ocular tetracycline in treating trachoma. Although not as well tolerated as phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis, azithromycin is at least as well tolerated as most other agents used to treat respiratory tract and other infections in children and was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Adverse events that do occur are mostly gastrointestinal and tend to be mild to moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin is an effective and well tolerated alternative to first-line agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue infections in children, offerring the convenience of a short, once-daily regimen.

In vitro activity of levofloxacin against a selected group of anaerobic bacteria isolated from skin and soft tissue infections

The in vitro activity of levofloxacin was compared to the activities of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin-sulbactam (2:1), cefoxitin, and metronidazole for a selected group of anaerobes (n = 175) isolated from skin and soft tissue infections by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards-approved Wadsworth method. Ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoxitin inhibited 99% of the strains of this select group, levofloxacin and ofloxacin inhibited 73 and 50%, respectively, at 2 microg/ml, and ciprofloxacin inhibited 51% at 1 microg/ml. The geometric mean MIC of levofloxacin was lower than those of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for every group except Veillonella.

Overview of the etiology of wound infections with particular emphasis on community-acquired illnesses

Wound cultures represent a general catchall category for a group of extremely diverse anatomic samples that range from superficial specimens of cutaneous structures (folliculitis, cellulitis) to specimens revealing invasive infections involving deep fascial planes and muscle (myonecrosis). Because of the complex nature of these infective processes, the terminology associated with such infections is often imprecise and confusing. Wounds are the result of trauma, either intentionally or accidentally induced. Nosocomial wound infections result primarily from surgical procedures, the development of pressure sores, or catheterization. Community-acquired wound infections are often preceded by injuries resulting from occupational exposure or recreational activities and are associated with a greater diversity of microorganisms due to the exposure of open wounds to inhabitants of the microbial biosphere. This review provides a general overview of the categories of wound infections and describes their acquisition and clinical significance. Particular emphasis is placed on selected community-acquired wound infections and the etiologic agents associated with such conditions.

Susceptibilities of bovine summer mastitis bacteria to antimicrobial agents

The susceptibility to 9 antimicrobial agents of 32 aerobic bacterial isolates and to 10 antimicrobial agents of 37 anaerobic bacterial isolates from 23 cases of bovine summer mastitis (16 Actinomyces pyogenes isolates, 8 Streptococcus dysgalactiae isolates, 3 S. uberis isolates, 3 S. acidominimus isolates, 2 Streptococcus spp., 15 Peptostreptococcus indolicus isolates, 10 Fusobacterium necrophorum isolates, and 12 isolates of anaerobic gram-negative rods) was determined by the agar dilution method. All isolates except one Bacteroides fragilis isolate (beta-lactamase producer) were susceptible to penicillin G, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, clindamycin, and chloramphenicol (the B. fragilis strain was susceptible to the last four), which had MICs at which 90% of isolates were inhibited (MIC90s) of < or = 0.06, < or = 0.06, < or = 0.06 0.25, < or = 0.06, and 4.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. Spiramycin was active against the gram-positive aerobes (MIC90, 1.0 microgram/ml) but not against the anaerobes (MIC90, 16.0 micrograms/ml). Similar trends were noted for susceptibilities of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria to ofloxacin (MIC90s, 2.0 and 8 micrograms/ml, respectively). Occasional strains of aerobic streptococci were resistant to oxytetracycline, but all anaerobes were susceptible. Tinidazole was active against all anaerobes (MIC90, 2.0 micrograms/ml). beta-Lactamase was produced only by the B. fragilis isolate.