Cefixime penetration in human renal parenchyma

Cephalosporins for the treatment of uncomplicated pyelonephritis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines recommend ciprofloxacin or sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) as first-line agents to treat uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis (APN).

OBJECTIVE

With increasing antimicrobial resistance rates and recent changes in practice patterns, the objective of this systematic review was to describe the effectiveness of cephalosporins for uncomplicated APN in more recently published literature.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for reporting. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for publications between January 2010 and September 2022. Eligible articles detailed patients with uncomplicated APN, treated with first- to fourth-generation cephalosporins, and identified a clinical, microbiological, or health care utilization outcome. Studies with more than 30% of complicated APN patients, non-English-language studies, case reports, case series, pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic studies, and in vitro laboratory or animal studies were excluded. Screening, review, and extraction were performed independently by 2 researchers, plus a third for conflict resolution. Critical appraisal of studies was performed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.

RESULTS

Eight studies met inclusion, including 5 cohort studies (62.5%), 2 randomized controlled trials (25%), and 1 nonrandomized experimental study (12.5%). Cephalosporins most used across the studies included cefazolin, cephalexin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, cefdinir, cefditoren, and ceftriaxone. Outcomes assessed were diverse, including clinical or microbiological success and time to defervescence or symptom resolution. Cephalosporins displayed effectiveness for the treatment of acute uncomplicated APN regardless of study design or the presence of a comparison group. No trials reported inferiority of clinical treatment outcomes compared with a fluoroquinolone or SMX-TMP.

CONCLUSION

Cephalosporins may be viable treatment options for the management of uncomplicated APN.

Clavulanate combinations with mecillinam, cefixime or cefpodoxime against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales frequently associated with blaOXA-1 in a paediatric population with febrile urinary tract infections

OBJECTIVES

Oral treatment of febrile urinary tract infections (FUTIs) can be impaired by MDR Enterobacterales often combining ESBL and inhibitor-resistant genes. We studied the impact of β-lactamases and Enterobacterales' genotypes on the cefixime, cefpodoxime and mecillinam ± amoxicillin/clavulanate MICs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentric study, we included 251 previously whole-genome-sequenced ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, isolated in French children with FUTIs. The MICs of cefixime, cefpodoxime, mecillinam alone and combined with amoxicillin/clavulanate were determined and analysed with respect to genomic data. We focused especially on the isolates' ST and their type of β-lactamases. Clinical outcomes of patients who received cefixime + amoxicillin/clavulanate were also analysed.

RESULTS

All isolates were cefixime and cefpodoxime resistant. Disparities depending on blaCTX-M variants were observed for cefixime. The addition of amoxicillin/clavulanate restored susceptibility for cefixime and cefpodoxime in 97.2% (MIC50/90 of 0.38/0.75 mg/L) and 55.4% (MIC50/90 of 1/2 mg/L) of isolates, respectively, whatever the ST, the blaCTX-M variants or the association with inhibitor-resistant β-lactamases (34.2%). All isolates were susceptible to mecillinam + amoxicillin/clavulanate with MIC50/90 of 0.19/0.25 mg/L, respectively. Neither therapeutic failure nor any subsequent positive control urine culture were reported for patients who received cefixime + amoxicillin/clavulanate as an oral relay therapy (n = 54).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the frequent association of ESBL genes with inhibitor-resistant β-lactamases, the cefixime + amoxicillin/clavulanate MICs remain low. The in vivo efficacy of this combination was satisfying even when first-line treatment was ineffective. Considering the MIC distributions and pharmacokinetic parameters, mecillinam + amoxicillin/clavulanate should also be an alternative to consider when treating FUTIs in children.

Optimization of HPLC method for determination of cefixime using 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde as derivatizing reagent: A new approach

The determination of cefixime 1 has clinical and analytical importance due to its broad spectrum antimicrobial activity and stability. Cefixime is a significant member of orally active third generation cephalosporin and has excellent activity against many pathogens. It is for first time that we have developed a new HPLC–DAD method for analysis of imine derivative 3 of cefixime by using reflux method at 100 °C for 50 min without any buffer solution. 2 Thiophenecarboxaldehyde (2TCA) 2 was used first time as a derivatizing reagent for cefixime drug. Furthermore, separation of three components, i.e. drug (cefixime), reagent (2TCA) and derivative was carried out using kromasil 100 C-18 (15 mm × 0.46 mm, 5 μm) column with isocratic elution of methanol: 0.1% aqueous formic acid (70:30 v/v) with flow rate of 1 ml min⁻¹ at retention time of 1.8, 2.4 and 3.3 min, respectively; while, total run time was 5 min. The developed method was repeatable with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.81–1.88% for imine derivative. The limit of detection and quantification of imine derivative 3 were obtained within the range of 0.132–0.401 μg ml⁻¹ and compared with cefixime drug as 0.30–0.90 μg ml⁻¹, respectively. However, the formation of imine derivative 3 was confirmed by comparing peak height, retention time and spectral changes. The method is rapid, simple, very stable and accurate for the separation and determination of imine derivative 3 of cefixime 1.