In vitro susceptibilities of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis to four fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, d-ofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin), cefpirome, and meropenem

Pharmacotherapy for Bordetella pertussis infection. I. A synthesis of laboratory sciences

There is considerable history and practice experience both with laboratory susceptibility testing for Bordetella pertussis and clinical treatment. This two-part narrative review provides a synthesis of the laboratory and clinical sciences as they apply to this bacterium and the clinical consequences of treating infection. It is generally held that antibiotic susceptibility testing for B. pertussis is not sufficiently standardised, but there has not been an urgent need to consolidate the same given the lack global experience with major resistance profiles. Experience in China, however, has provided concern for high-level macrolide resistance. The nature of and frequency of such resistance has raised the bar for reconsideration of susceptibility testing given that first-line treatment may be regionally compromised. Disk diffusion and Etest susceptibility testing can be recommended for screening resistance among individual isolates of B. pertussis and on an ad hoc manner. Disk diffusion, Etest and/or critical agar dilution testing can be recommended for large-scale studies. Standards for inoculum, growth atmosphere, timing of interpretation, preferred testing media and controls can be extrapolated from the publications to date. Such methods should be able to detect high-level resistance to several antibiotics, but especially macrolides. Concern for intermediate-susceptible categories requires consideration as well as the correlation with bacteriological and clinical outcomes. Provisional standards can be applied at this time, and modification or fine-tuning of any such standards are open to future investigation.

Current pharmacotherapy of pertussis

Human infection with Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis causes significant morbidity and mortality. While universal immunisation represents the mainstay of prevention, the purpose of this review is to summarise the current options for antimicrobial chemotherapy of pertussis. Several chemotherapeutic approaches have an important place in therapy and in infection control. Supportive treatment including nasopharyngeal suction, oxygen and parenteral fluids, is essential for infants < 1 year who are at greatest risk of complications and permanent sequelae. Steroids and beta2-agonists are also used in the management of severe neonatal pertussis. Several antibiotics have been shown to reduce the level of bacterial colonisation of the respiratory tract, however, erythromycin is accepted to be the treatment of choice. Erythromycin reduces severity and duration of disease, even if started during the paroxysmal phase. A 14 day course is recommended although side effects may limit compliance; a recent study indicates that a 7 day course may have similar efficacy in terms of eradication and prevention of relapse. Alternatives to erythromycin are clarithromycin, azithromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Fluoroquinolones have good in vitro activity against both B. pertussis and B. parapertussis and may be useful in the treatment of adult patients with pertussis, although there are no supporting clinical data at present. Erythromycin prophylaxis is also recommended for close household contacts of patients with pertussis.

Levofloxacin

Levofloxacin (DR-3355, Daiichi) is a new fluoroquinolone antibiotic which is the active isomer of ofloxacin (DL-8280, Daiichi). By removing the inactive isomer, the in vitro activity of levofloxacin is 8-128 times higher than that of ofloxacin. This means that bacterial species, which have borderline susceptibility to ofloxacin and other first generation fluoroquinolones (e.g., pneumococci and organisms causing atypical pneumonia), are considerably more sensitive to levofloxacin. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin, which is available for both oral and i.v. administration, are characterised by a very high bioavailability, low (30-40%) protein binding, high tissue concentrations and elimination via the kidneys with minimal liver metabolism. As a consequence of the low degree of metabolism, levofloxacin does not interact with other drugs to any major extent. The safety and efficacy of levofloxacin are well documented in lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and urinary tract infections. The safety profile seems advantageous and the risks of phototoxicity, CNS toxicity and cardiac reactions (prolongation of QT-time) are low. Serious liver toxicity, leading to the recent withdrawal of trovafloxacin, has not been a problem in levofloxacin studies. Levofloxacin is a valuable addition to the group of fluoroquinolone antibiotics.