Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during 1998-1999: prevalence of mef(A) and erm(B) and susceptibilities to ketolides

Characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae Macrolide Resistance and Its Mechanism in Northeast China over a 20-Year Period

Due to the resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to β-lactams, macrolides, and tetracyclines, treatment alternatives have become increasingly limited worldwide. We aim to describe the characterization of erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae (ERSP) strains in northeastern China over a period of 20 years. A total of 1,240 ERSP strains were collected and classified into five groups based on the ages of the patients. Etest strips and Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion were performed for drug susceptibility testing. The capsule swelling test was used for capsule typing. The phenotype of drug resistance was detected by the erythromycin and clindamycin double-disk method. The ermB, ermTR, mefA, and tetM genes were detected by PCR. Among the 1,240 ERSP strains, 510 were invasive isolates, and 730 were noninvasive isolates. The results of drug susceptibility testing showed that the rates of resistance to penicillin, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, meropenem, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and chloramphenicol varied among the different age groups. 19F, 19A, 23F, 14, and 6B were the serotypes that were commonly found among ERSP strains. Among all strains, 99.03% (1,228/1,240) exhibited an MLSB (macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B) resistance phenotype, of which 1,221 strains displayed a constitutive MLSB (cMLSB) phenotype and 7 strains showed an inducible MLSB (iMLSB) phenotype. All of these strains carried the ermB gene. In contrast, only 0.97% of strains of M phenotypes were found to carry the mefA gene. Both the ermB and mefA genes were detected in 704 strains that exhibited multidrug resistance, whereas the ermTR gene was not detected. Furthermore, 1,185 tetracycline-resistant strains were found to carry the tetM gene. Macrolide antimicrobial drugs should be used cautiously for the empirical treatment of S. pneumoniae infections. IMPORTANCE This study presents a retrospective analysis using 1,240 clinical erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (ERSP) isolates collected in northeastern China between January 2000 and December 2019. The serotype distribution, corresponding vaccine coverage, as well as resistance phenotypes, genes, and mechanisms to macrolide and tetracycline of these isolates were systematically described, analyzed, and discussed. We hope that this study will inform clinicians in their respective regions when selecting antimicrobial agents. We also hope that this study is useful for researchers in related fields. Finally, we emphasize in this study that vaccination is the best preventive measure for S. pneumoniae infection considering its resistance to commonly used antibiotics. The determination of the S. pneumoniae serotype distribution also provides valuable empirical evidence for local health authorities when introducing appropriate vaccines in a specific area.

Drug Resistance Characteristics and Macrolide-Resistant Mechanisms of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Wenzhou City, China

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) is a Gram-positive, alpha-hemolytic, facultative anaerobic member of the genus Streptococcus. The erythromycin-resistant methylase (erm) gene and macrolide efflux (mef) gene are the 2 main genes that can mediate SP. Transposon (Tn) also plays an important role in the collection and metastasis of the gene. In the present study we investigated the drug resistance characteristics and the macrolide-resistant mechanisms of SP in Wenzhou City, China.

Material/Methods

Sixty-eight strains of SP were isolated from sputum samples of hospitalized children in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. These strains were analyzed using antimicrobial susceptibility tests to determine their drug resistance to 10 kinds of antibacterials. Macrolide-resistant phenotypes were identified using K-B method. PCR method was used to analyze the erm B gene, mef A gene, and int Tn gene.

Results

Drug resistance rates of 68 strains of SP were 98.5%, 100.0%, 63.2%, 52.9%, 94.1%, 89.7%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 16.2%, and 14.7% for clindamycin, erythromycin, penicillin G, cefotaxime, tetracycline, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, levofloxacin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, and amoxicillin, respectively. Total detection rates of the erm B gene, mef A gene, and int Tn gene were 98.5%, 91.2%, and 100.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

SP shows significant multi-drug resistance in Wenzhou City, whereas there is no clinical value of macrolides antibiotics for SP. cMLS_B mediated by erm B gene is the most predominant phenotype among macrolide-resistant SP. The int Tn gene may play an important role in horizontal transfer and clonal dissemination of SP drug resistance genes in Wenzhou City.

Macrolide use in the treatment of critically ill patients with pneumonia: Incidence, correlates, timing and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Macrolide antibiotics are commonly used to treat pneumonia despite increasing antimicrobial resistance. Evidence suggests that macrolides may also decrease mortality in severe sepsis via immunomodulatory properties.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence, correlates, timing and mortality associated with macrolide-based treatment.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of critically ill adults with pneumonia at five intensive care units in Edmonton, Alberta, was prospectively followed over two years. Data collected included disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score), pneumonia severity (Pneumonia Severity Index score), comorbidities, antibiotic treatments at presentation and time to effective antibiotic. The independent association between macrolide-based treatment and 30-day all-cause mortality was examined using multivariable Cox regression. A secondary exploratory analysis examined time to effective antimicrobial therapy.

RESULTS

The cohort included 328 patients with a mean Pneumonia Severity Index score of 116 and a mean APACHE II score of 17; 84% required invasive mechanical ventilation. Ninety-one (28%) patients received macrolide-based treatments, with no significant correlates of treatment except nursing home residence (15% versus 30% for nonresidents [P=0.02]). Overall mortality was 54 of 328 (16%) at 30 days: 14 of 91 (15%) among patients treated with macrolides versus 40 of 237 (17%) for nonmacrolides (adjusted HR 0.93 [95% CI 0.50 to 1.74]; P=0.8). Patients who received effective antibiotics within 4 h of presentation were less likely to die than those whose treatment was delayed (14% versus 17%; adjusted HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.94]; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Macrolide-based treatment was not associated with lower 30-day mortality among critically ill patients with pneumonia, although receipt of effective antibiotic within 4 h was strongly predictive of survival. Based on these results, timely effective treatment may be more important than choice of antibiotics.

First report of mefA and msrA/msrB multidrug efflux pumps associated with blaTEM-1 β-lactamase in Enterococcus faecalis

OBJECTIVES

Enterococcus faecalis is thought to possess a great deal of intrinsic resistance to several antimicrobial agents. In this study we identified ampicillin- and erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of E. faecalis and sought to identify the resistance mechanisms among these isolates.

METHODS

Twelve isolates of E. faecalis were collected from 12 different patients. Identification of the isolates and their susceptibility patterns were determined using the Phoenix automated phenotypic identification criteria. PCR amplification and sequencing were used to detect β-lactamase production. Colony blotting was performed in order to screen for multidrug efflux pump production. Extraction and N-terminal sequencing of the multidrug efflux pumps was carried out.

RESULTS

The E. faecalis isolates showed high resistance to erythromycin and ampicillin, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of >16 μg/ml. PCR amplification and sequencing showed that isolates produced TEM-1 β-lactamase. Colony blotting showed that these isolates harbored multidrug efflux pump genes. Multidrug efflux pump extraction, purification, and sequencing showed the distribution of mefA and msrA/msrB efflux pumps.

CONCLUSION

Two resistance mechanisms among E. faecalis are described - the production of TEM β-lactamase and mefA and msrA/msrB efflux pumps. These results are of great interest because this is the first report of the co-existence of these resistance mechanisms among E. faecalis strains.

In vitro pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of S-013420 against Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae

The pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters and the antibacterial activity of S-013420, a novel bicyclolide, against Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, including macrolide-resistant isolates, were investigated using an in vitro PD model. Various time-concentration curves were artificially constructed by modifying the PK data obtained in phase I studies. The activity against H. influenzae was evaluated using two parameters, that is, the area above the killing curve (AAC) and the viable cell reduction at 24 h. The relationships between the antibacterial activity of S-013420 and the three PK/PD parameters were investigated by fitting the data to the sigmoid maximum effective concentration model. The square of the correlation coefficient (R(2)) values for AAC versus the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24))/MIC, the peak concentration (C(max))/MIC, and the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the drug concentration exceeded the MIC under steady-state PK conditions (%T(MIC)) were 0.92, 0.87, and 0.49, respectively. The R(2) values for viable cell reduction at 24 h versus AUC(0-24)/MIC, C(max)/MIC, and %T(MIC) were 0.93, 0.61, and 0.56, respectively. These results demonstrated that AUC(0-24)/MIC is the most significant parameter for evaluation of the antibacterial activity of S-013420. The values of AUC(0-24)/MIC required for maximum and static efficacy were 10.8 and 9.63, respectively, for H. influenzae and 16.3 to 22.3 and 4.66 to 9.01, respectively, for S. pneumoniae. This analysis is considered useful for determining the AUC value at the infection site, which would be required for efficacy in clinical use.

Pharmacokinetics of EDP-420 after multiple oral doses in healthy adult volunteers and in a bioequivalence study

EDP-420 (also known as EP-013420, or S-013420) is a first-in-class bridged bicyclolide currently in clinical development for the treatment of respiratory tract infections (RTI) and has previously shown favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles after the administration of single oral doses of a suspension to healthy volunteers. Here we report its PK profile after the administration of multiple oral doses of a suspension to healthy adults. Bioequivalence between suspension and capsule formulations, as well as the effect of food, is also reported. The most important PK features of EDP-420 observed in these clinical studies are its long half-life of 17 to 18 h and its high systemic exposure, which support once-daily dosing and treatment durations potentially shorter than those of most other macrolide antibiotics. EDP-420 is readily absorbed following oral administration in both suspension and capsule formulations. In the multiple-oral-dose study, steady state was achieved on day 1 by using a loading dose of 400 mg/day, followed by 2 days of 200 mg/day. A high-fat meal had no effect on the bioavailability of EDP-420 administered in a capsule formulation. EDP-420 was well tolerated, with no serious or severe adverse events reported, and no subject was discontinued from the study due to an adverse event. Based on its human PK and safety profiles, together with its in vitro/in vivo activities against common respiratory pathogens, EDP-420 warrants further development, including trials for clinical efficacy in the treatment of RTI.

Pharmacokinetics of EDP-420 after ascending single oral doses in healthy adult volunteers

EDP-420 (EP-013420, S-013420) is a first-in-class bicyclolide (bridged bicyclic macrolide) currently in clinical development for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. It has good preclinical pharmacokinetic properties across multiple species and potent in vitro and in vivo activity against respiratory tract infection pathogens, including Haemophilus influenzae, atypical organisms (e.g., Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila), and multidrug-resistant streptococci. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of an orally administered EDP-420 suspension in 40 healthy adult subjects were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single-dose study. Eligible subjects were sequentially randomized into one of five study groups (i.e., 100-, 200-, 400-, 800-, or 1,200-mg dosing groups) consisting of eight subjects (six active and two placebo) each. EDP-420 was well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events reported, nor were there any dose-limiting clinical or laboratory adverse events reported. EDP-420 was rapidly absorbed after a single oral dose. The mean plasma terminal half-life ranged from 15.6 to 20.1 h with low clearance. At the 400-mg dose, the area under the curve was 14.4 microg x h/ml, which well exceeded the required area under the concentration-time curve to cover common respiratory tract infection pathogens based on preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling. The long half-life and high systemic exposure of EDP-420 support once-daily dosing and may allow for shorter treatment durations compared to other macrolide antibiotics. Based on its human pharmacokinetic profiles, taken together with its in vitro/in vivo activity against common respiratory pathogens, EDP-420 warrants efficacy trials for the treatment of respiratory tract infections.

The macrolide resistance genes erm(B) and mef(E) are carried by Tn2010 in dual-gene Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates belonging to clonal complex CC271

The genetic elements carrying macrolide resistance genes in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates belonging to CC271 were investigated. The international clone Taiwan(19F)-14 was found to carry Tn2009, a Tn916-like transposon containing tet(M) and mef(E). The dual erm(B) mef(E) isolates carried Tn2010, which is similar to Tn2009 with the addition of a putative new transposon, the erm(B) genetic element.

Antibiotic susceptibility and prevalence of erythromycin ribosomal methylase gene, erm(B) in Streptococcus spp

The aim of this study was to investigate drug resistance and the genetic relatedness of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus spp. from different animals and humans in Taiwan. Cumulatively, 248 isolates were collected from 15 animal species and human patients and the susceptibilities of the isolates to six antimicrobial agents including azithromycin (AZI), clarithromycin (CLAR), erythromycin (ERY), spiramycin (SPIR), amoxicillin (AMO), and enrofloxacin (ENRO) were determined by the agar dilution method. The results indicated that resistance among the 248 strains was highest for SPIR, followed by ENRO, CLAR, ERY, AZI, and AMO. The most common resistotypes of the isolates from mammals and aquatic animals were AZI-CLAR-ERY-SPIR (27.5%) and SPIR (55.1%), respectively. The presence of ERY-resistant genes was confirmed by PCR. The erm gene was amplified from 28 isolates (20.6%) by PCR for further investigation. The predominant erm gene in the ERY-resistant isolates was the erm(B) gene. The phylogenetic analysis of the erm(B) gene results indicated that there was a close genetic relationship among all the strains but the genotypic clusters did not show clear segregation of the isolates according to the source or region.

The use of erythromycin as a gastrointestinal prokinetic agent in adult critical care: benefits versus risks

Erythromycin A, the first macrolide, was introduced in the 1950s and after years of clinical experience it still remains a commonly relied upon antibiotic. In the past, pharmacodynamic characteristics of macrolides beyond antimicrobial action such as anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating properties have been of scientific and clinical interest. The function of erythromycin as a prokinetic agent has also been investigated for a range of gastrointestinal motility disorders and more recently within the context of critically ill patients. Prokinetic agents are drugs that increase contractile force and accelerate intraluminal transit. Whilst the anti-inflammatory action may be a desirable side effect to its antibiotic action, using erythromycin A merely for its prokinetic effect alone raises the concern about promoting emergence of macrolide resistance. The objectives of this review article are: (i) to briefly summarize the modes and epidemiology of macrolide resistance, particularly in respect to that found in the Streptococcus species (a potential reservoir for the dissemination of macrolide resistance on the critical care unit); (ii) to discuss in this context the evidence for conditions promoting bacterial resistance against macrolides; and (iii) to assess the potential clinical benefit of using erythromycin A as a prokinetic versus the risks of promoting emergence of macrolide resistance in the clinical setting. We conclude, that in view of the growing weight of evidence demonstrating the potential epidemiological impact of the increased use of macrolides upon the spread of resistance, versus a lack of sufficient and convincing evidence that erythromycin A is a superior prokinetic agent to potential alternatives in the critically ill patient population, at this stage we do not advocate the use of erythromycin A as a prokinetic agent in critically ill patients unless they have failed all other treatment for impaired gastrointestinal dysmotility and are intolerant of metoclopramide. Further large and methodologically robust studies are needed to ascertain the effectiveness of erythromycin A and other alternative agents in the critically ill.

Characterisation of macrolide-non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae colonising children attending day-care centres in Athens, Greece during 2000 and 2003

Nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates colonising young children are representative of isolates causing clinical disease. This study determined the frequency of macrolide-non-susceptible pneumococci, as well as their phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, among pneumococci collected during two cross-sectional surveillance studies of the nasopharynx of 2847 children attending day-care centres in the Athens metropolitan area during 2000 and 2003. In total, 227 macrolide-non-susceptible pneumococcal isolates were studied. Increases in macrolide non-susceptibility, from 23% to 30.3% (p <0.05), and in macrolide and penicillin co-resistance, from 3.4% to 48.6% (p <0.001), were identified during the study period. The M resistance phenotype, associated with the presence of the mef(A)/(E) gene, predominated in both surveys, and isolates carrying both mef(A)/(E) and erm(AM) were identified, for the first time in Greece, among the isolates from the 2003 survey. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of the isolates from the 2000 survey indicated the spread of a macrolide- and penicillin-resistant clone among day-care centres. The serogroups identified most commonly in the study were 19F, 6A, 6B, 14 and 23F, suggesting that the theoretical protection of the seven-valent conjugate vaccine against macrolide-non-susceptible isolates was c. 85% during both study periods.

The mef(E)-carrying genetic element (mega) of Streptococcus pneumoniae: insertion sites and association with other genetic elements

The structure of the macrolide efflux genetic assembly (mega) element, its genomic locations, and its association with other resistance determinants and genetic elements were investigated in 16 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates carrying mef(E), of which 1 isolate also carried tet(M) and 4 isolates also carried tet(M) and erm(B). All isolates carried a mega element of similar size and structure that included the operon mef(E)-msr(D) encoding the efflux transport system. Among tetracycline-susceptible isolates, six different integration sites were identified, five of which were recognized inside open reading frames present in the R6 genome. In the five isolates also carrying tet(M), mega was inserted in different genetic contexts. In one isolate, it was part of previously described Tn916-like element Tn2009. In another isolate, mega was inserted in a transposon similar to Tn2009 that also included an erm(B) element. This new composite transposon was designated Tn2010. Neither Tn2009 nor Tn2010 could be transferred by conjugation to pneumococcal or enterococcal recipients. In the three isolates in which mega was not physically linked with tet(M), this gene was associated with erm(B) in transposon Tn3872, a Tn916-like element. Homologies between the chromosomal insertions of these composite transposons and sequences of multidrug-resistant pneumococcal genomes in the databases indicate the presence of preferential sites for the integration of composite Tn916-like elements carrying multiple resistance determinants in S. pneumoniae.

Efficacy of cethromycin, a new ketolide, against Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptible or resistant to erythromycin in a murine pneumonia model

Cethromycin is a ketolide with in vitro activity against macrolide-sensitive and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. We compared its in vivo efficacy to erythromycin in a mouse model of acute pneumonia induced by two virulent clinical strains: a serotype 3 susceptible strain (P-4241) (MICs: erythromycin, 0.03 microg/ml; cethromycin, 0.015 microg/ml) and a serotype 1 strain resistant to erythromycin (P-6254; phenotypically MLSB constitutive) (MICs: erythromycin, 1,024 microg/ml; cethromycin, 0.03 microg/ml). Immunocompetent mice were infected with 10(5) CFU of each strain. Six treatments given either subcutaneously (s.c.) or per os (p.o.) at 12-h intervals were initiated at 6 or 12 h after infection. Against P-4241, cethromycin given s.c. at 25 or 12.5 mg/kg protected 100% of the animals, with lungs and blood completely cleared of bacteria. Given p.o., cethromycin maintained its efficacy with 100 and 86% survival at 25 and 12.5 mg/kg, respectively. Erythromycin, given s.c. at 50 or 37.5 mg/kg, provided 50 and 38% survival rates, respectively. Against P-6254, cethromycin was effective at 25 mg/kg (100% survival) regardless of the administration route, whereas only 25 and 8% of animals survived after a 75-mg/kg erythromycin treatment given s.c. and p.o., respectively. The serum protein binding levels of cethromycin were 94.8 and 88.5% after doses of 12.5 and 25 mg/kg, respectively. The higher in vivo activity of cethromycin compared to erythromycin could be explained by favorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indexes against P-6254 but not against P-4241.

Prevalence and antibacterial susceptibility of mef(A)-positive macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae over 4 years (2000 to 2004) of the PROTEKT US Study

In the United States, approximately 30% of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates are macrolide (erythromycin [ERY]) resistant (ERSP), most commonly due to expression of the mef(A) gene previously associated with lower-level ERY resistance (ERYr; MIC=1 to 4 microg/ml). The data from the PROTEKT US surveillance study were analyzed to evaluate the prevalence and antibacterial susceptibility of mef(A)-positive ERSP. In all, 26,634 isolates of S. pneumoniae were collected in the United States between 2000 and 2004 from centers common to all years. ERYr was stable at approximately 29% over the 4 years, but the proportion of ERSP isolates positive for mef(A) alone decreased (year 1 [2000 to 2001], 69.0%; year 4 [2003 to 2004], 60.7%), with the sharpest declines seen in isolates from patients from 0 to 2 years of age. Conversely, the proportion isolates positive for both erm(B) and mef(A) increased over the duration of the present study (year 1, 9.3%; year 4, 19.1%), a change that was again most marked in patients aged <or=2 years. The majority of ERSP isolates expressing mef(A) alone exhibited higher than previously reported levels of ERYr (MIC90=16 microg/ml). However, the ketolide antibacterial telithromycin consistently demonstrated in vitro activity against these isolates over the 4 years of the study (MIC90=0.5 to 1 microg/ml).

Macrolide and ketolide resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae

Antimicrobial agents in the macrolide family have long been considered drugs of potential utility in the management of infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, with the emergence of macrolide resistance, the clinical value of macrolides in pneumococcal infections is threatened. In part, as a consequence of the development of macrolide resistance, recently the first agent in the ketolide antimicrobial class, telithromycin, was developed and introduced into clinical practice. The ketolides are macrolide antimicrobials whose chemistry has been modified so as avoid the effects of the most common mechanisms of macrolide resistance with S pneumoniae. This discussion reviews the current state of resistance to macrolides and ketolides with S pneumoniae in North America.

Molecular characterisation of Canadian paediatric multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae from 1998-2004

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Streptococcus pneumoniae (i.e. resistant to three different antimicrobial classes) is a global concern. The molecular epidemiology of MDR S. pneumoniae has not been characterised in Canadian paediatric isolates. Paediatric MDR S. pneumoniae were obtained from a national surveillance study. Susceptibility testing was performed by the methods of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Phenotypic and genotypic relatedness were assessed by serotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Penicillin resistance was assessed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by DNA sequencing of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 1A, 2B and 2X. Macrolide resistance was assessed by PCR-based detection of mef(E) and erm(B). PCR and sequencing of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene was performed to assess resistance to trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (T/S). Seventy (98.6%) of 71 MDR paediatric isolates were concomitantly resistant to penicillin, erythromycin and T/S. Resistance genes mef(E) (66.2%) or erm(B) (22.5%) or both mef(E) and erm(B) (8.5%) were associated with macrolide resistance, and the prevalence of erm(B) increased significantly (P=0.0001) over time. Penicillin resistance was associated with amino acid substitutions in PBPs 1A, 2B and 2X. Resistance to T/S was associated with amino acid substitutions in the DHFR gene; in particular, Ile100-->Leu was detected in all isolates analysed. PFGE revealed three clusters of isolates that were genetically related and associated with specific serotypes (Taiwan(19F), Spain(23F), Spain(14) and France(9V)), suggesting clonal expansion as the primary means of paediatric MDR S. pneumoniae dissemination in Canada. The heptavalent pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar, currently approved in Canada for use in children < or =2 years of age, provided excellent coverage (90.2%) of paediatric MDR S. pneumoniae. In conclusion, paediatric MDR S. pneumoniae simultaneously resistant to penicillin, erythromycin and T/S are genetically similar and disseminating across Canada. Prevnar provides excellent coverage of paediatric MDR S. pneumoniae.

The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among upper respiratory tract pathogens. Resistance to beta-lactam drugs among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes is increasing. As safe and well-tolerated antibiotics, macrolides play a key role in the treatment of community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Their broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive cocci, such as S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, atypical pathogens, H. influenzae (azithromycin and clarithromycin), and Moraxella catarrhalis, has led to the widespread use of macrolides for empiric treatment of upper RTIs and as alternatives for patients allergic to beta-lactams. Macrolide resistance is increasing among pneumococci and recently among S. pyogenes, and is associated with increasing use of the newer macrolides, such as azithromycin. Ribosomal target modification mediated by erm(A) and erm(B) genes and active efflux due to mef(A) and mef(E) are the principal mechanisms of resistance in both S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Recently, ribosomal protein and RNA mutations have been found to be responsible for acquired resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and H. influenzae. Although macrolides are only weakly active against macrolide-resistant streptococci species, producing an efflux pump (mef), and are inactive against pathogens with ribosomal target modification (erm), treatment failures are uncommon. Therefore, macrolide therapy, for now, remains a good alternative for treatment of upper RTIs; however, continuous monitoring of the local resistance patterns is essential.

Rise of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates containing both erm(B) and mef(E) genes from an adult tertiary care community hospital system

The emergence of macrolide- and lincosamide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae is a worldwide concern. Of particular interest is the increasing prevalence of erythromycin and clindamycin-resistant isolates containing both erm(B) and mef genes. This study determined the prevalence of erythromycin and clindamycin resistance in 596 clinical S. pneumoniae isolates from 2 adult tertiary care hospitals over a 4-year period (2001-2004). Erythromycin resistance increased from 24% to 34%, but S. pneumoniae isolates resistant to clindamycin as well as to erythromycin increased from 3% in 2001 to 15.5% in 2004 (5-fold increase). Among erythromycin-resistant isolates, those also resistant to clindamycin (MLS(B) phenotype) increased 3-fold (12.8-45%). Of forty-one erythromycin/clindamycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates tested, 29 (71%) contained both erm(B) and mef(E) genes. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis performed on 28 erm(B) + mef(E) positive isolates identified 2 predominant and possibly related clones, which made up 64% of the isolates.

Prevalence and molecular genetics of macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in Finland in 2002

The prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance among 1,007 clinical pneumococcal isolates collected in Finland were investigated. Of these, 217 (21.5%) were resistant to erythromycin and 11% to clindamycin. Among the erythromycin-resistant isolates, mef(E) was present in 95 isolates (44%), mef(A) was present in 12 isolates (6%), and erm(B) was present in 90 isolates (41%). A double mechanism, mef(E) and erm(B), was detected in five isolates (2%). Ribosomal mutation was detected in 14 (6%) macrolide-resistant isolates in which no other determinant was found. Based on the telithromycin MICs, two groups of isolates were formed: 83.3% of the isolates belonged to a major group for which the telithromycin MIC range was < or =0.008 to 0.063 microg/ml, and 16.7% belonged to a minor group for which the telithromycin MIC range was 0.125 to 8 microg/ml. All except three isolates in the minor population carried a macrolide resistance gene.

Expression of the mef(E) gene encoding the macrolide efflux pump protein increases in Streptococcus pneumoniae with increasing resistance to macrolides

Active macrolide efflux is a major mechanism of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae in many parts of the world, especially North America. In Canada, this active macrolide efflux in S. pneumoniae is predominantly due to acquisition of the mef(E) gene. In the present study, we assessed the mef(E) gene sequence as well as mef(E) expression in variety of low- and high-level macrolide-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible (M-phenotype) S. pneumoniae isolates (erythromycin MICs, 1 to 32 microg/ml; clindamycin MICs, < or = 0.25 microg/ml). Southern blot hybridization with mef(E) probe and EcoRI digestion and relative real-time reverse transcription-PCR were performed to study the mef(E) gene copy number and expression. Induction of mef(E) expression was analyzed by Etest susceptibility testing pre- and postincubation with subinhibitory concentrations of erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, telithromycin, and clindamycin. The macrolide efflux gene, mef(E), was shown to be a single-copy gene in all 23 clinical S. pneumoniae isolates tested, and expression post-macrolide induction increased 4-, 6-, 20-, and 200-fold in isolates with increasing macrolide resistance (erythromycin MICs 2, 4, 8, and 32 microg/ml, respectively). Sequencing analysis of the macrolide efflux genetic assembly (mega) revealed that mef(E) had a 16-bp deletion 153 bp upstream of the putative start codon in all 23 isolates. A 119-bp intergenic region between mef(E) and mel was sequenced, and a 99-bp deletion was found in 11 of the 23 M-phenotype S. pneumoniae isolates compared to the published mega sequence. However, the mef(E) gene was fully conserved among both high- and low-level macrolide-resistant isolates. In conclusion, increased expression of mef(E) is associated with higher levels of macrolide resistance in macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae.

Characterization of Erythromycin-ResistantStreptococcus pneumoniaein Korea, andIn VitroActivity of Telithromycin against Erythromycin-ResistantStreptococcus pneumoniae

To characterize the phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Korea and to evaluate the in vitro activity of telithromycin against these erythromycin-resistant isolates, we tested a total of 676 isolates of S. pneumoniae collected from 1997 to 2002 in a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea. MICs for erythromycin and telithromycin were determined by the agar dilution method. The macrolide resistance phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant isolates were determined by the erythromycin- clindamycin-rokitamycin triple disk (ECRTD) and MIC induction tests, whereas their macrolide resistance genotypes were determined by PCR for the erm(B), erm(A), subclass erm(TR), and mef genes. To discriminate between mef(A) and mef(E), PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses were performed. Of the 676 S. pneumoniae isolates, 459 (67.9%) were resistant to erythromycin. Of the 459 erythromycin-resistant isolates, 343 (74.7%) were assigned to the cMLS phenotype, 48 (10.4%) to the iMcLS phenotype, 4 (0.9%) to the iMLS phenotype, and 64 (14.0%) to the M phenotype. The erm(B) gene was detected in 251 (54.6%) isolates, the mef gene was detected in 64 (14.0%), and both the erm(B) and mef genes were detected in 144 (31.4%) isolates. All of the mef genes detected were identified as mef(E). Of the 459 erythromycin- resistant isolates, all but one were susceptible to telithromycin. The MIC(50)/MIC(90) to telithromycin of isolates carrying erm(B), mef(E), and both genes was 0.06/0.5 microg/ml, 0.03/0.125 microg/ml, and 0.5/1.0 microg/ml, respectively. Although the MICs of telithromycin for the erythromycin-resistant isolates varied according to genotype, telithromycin was very active against these erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae.

Erythromycin resistance in the commensal throat flora of patients visiting the general practitioner: a reservoir for resistance genes for potential pathogenic bacteria

The prevalence and mechanism of erythromycin resistance in commensal throat streptococci was determined from October 2000 until December 2002 as part of an ongoing study of the NIVEL in general practice patients (N=678). Resistance prevalence for 1mg/L and 16 mg/L erythromycin was 57% and 20%, respectively. The percentage of total commensal flora resistant within each patient ranged from 1% to 100% (median, 1%). mefA was predominantly found among isolates on the 1mg/L plates, and ermB was found in 64% of the isolates on the 16 mg/L plates. Erythromycin resistance was transferred from a commensal isolate to Streptococcus pneumoniae with a frequency of 1 x 10(-9). Commensal streptococci of general practice patients in The Netherlands form a large reservoir of transferable erythromycin resistance (genes) for potential pathogenic microorganisms.

Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum and epithelial lining fluid against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for which telithromycin MICs vary

The present study, using an in vitro model, assessed telithromycin pharmacodynamic activity at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum (S) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Two macrolide-susceptible (PCR negative for both mefE and ermB) and 11 efflux-producing macrolide-resistant [PCR-positive for mefE and negative for ermB) S. pneumoniae strains with various telithromycin MICs (0.015 to 1 microg/ml) were tested. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of telithromycin were modeled, simulating a dosage of 800 mg orally once daily administered at time 0 and at 24 h (free-drug maximum concentration [C(max)] in serum, 0.7 microg/ml; half-life [t(1/2)], 10 h; free-drug C(max) in ELF, 6.0 microg/ml; t(1/2), 10 h). Starting inocula were 10(6) CFU/ml in Mueller-Hinton Broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log(10) CFU/ml versus initial inoculum). Free-telithromycin concentrations in serum achieved in the model were C(max) 0.9 +/- 0.08 microg/ml, area under the curve to MIC (AUC(0-24 h)) 6.4 +/- 1.5 microg . h/ml, and t(1/2) of 10.6 +/- 0.6 h. Telithromycin-free ELF concentrations achieved in the model were C(max) 6.6 +/- 0.8 microg/ml, AUC(0-24 h) 45.5 +/- 5.5 microg . h/ml, and t(1/2) of 10.5 +/- 1.7 h. Free-telithromycin S and ELF concentrations rapidly eradicated efflux-producing macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae with telithromycin MICs up to and including 0.25 microg/ml and 1 microg/ml, respectively. Free-telithromycin S and ELF concentrations simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 3.5 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 25 completely eradicated (> or =4 log(10) killing) macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h. Free-telithromycin concentrations in serum simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 1.8 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 12.5 were bacteriostatic (0.1 to 0.2 log(10) killing) against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h. In conclusion, free-telithromycin concentrations in serum and ELF simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 3.5 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 25 completely eradicated (> or =4 log(10) killing) macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h.

Telithromycin: A Ketolide Antibiotic for Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections

Telithromycin, a recently approved ketolide antibiotic derived from 14-membered macrolides, is active against erythromycin-resistant pneumococci. Telithromycin has enhanced activity in vitro because it binds not only to domain V of ribosomal RNA (like macrolides do) but also to domain II. However, it is not active against streptococci and staphylococci with constitutive macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B resistance. Telithromycin, available in an oral formulation, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in adults for treatment of (1) community-acquired pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae (including multidrug-resistant isolates), Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, or Mycoplasma pneumoniae; (2) acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis due to S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, or M. catarrhalis; or (3) acute bacterial sinusitis due to S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, or methicillin- and erythromycin-susceptible Streptococcus aureus. It is not approved for treatment of tonsillitis, pharyngitis, or severe pneumococcal pneumonia. Unique visual adverse effects occurred in 0.27%-2.1% of patients receiving telithromycin therapy. Its enhanced activity against some common respiratory pathogens makes it a valuable addition to the available macrolides.

The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among upper respiratory tract pathogens. Resistance to beta-lactam drugs among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes is increasing. As safe and well-tolerated antibiotics, macrolides play a key role in the treatment of community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Their broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive cocci, such as S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, atypical pathogens, H. influenzae (azithromycin and clarithromycin), and Moraxella catarrhalis, has led to the widespread use of macrolides for empiric treatment of upper RTIs and as alternatives for patients allergic to b-lactams. Macrolide resistance is increasing among pneumococci and recently among S. pyogenes, and is associated with increasing use of the newer macrolides, such as azithromycin. Ribosomal target modification mediated by erm(A) and erm(B) genes and active efflux due to mef(A) and mef(E) are the principal mechanisms of resistance in S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Recently, ribosomal protein and RNA mutations have been found responsible for acquired resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and H. influenzae. Although macrolides are only weakly active against macrolide-resistant streptococci species producing an efflux pump (mef) and are inactive against pathogens with ribosomal target modification (erm), treatment failures are uncommon. Therefore, macrolide therapy, for now, remains a good alternative for treatment of upper RTIs; however, continuous monitoring of the local resistance patterns is essential.

Molecular epidemiology and prevalence of macrolide efflux genes mef(A) and mef(E) in Streptococcus pneumoniae obtained in Canada from 1997 to 2002

One hundred forty M phenotype Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates were evaluated by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism, serotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Molecular genotyping revealed that the predominant macrolide resistance mechanism in S. pneumoniae in Canada is mef(E) and resistance dissemination is due to both spread of the genetic element MEGA as well as clonal dissemination of penicillin- and/or macrolide-resistant strains.

Telithromycin: The first ketolide for the treatment of respiratory infections

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, mechanisms of resistance, in vitro activity, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, indications, adverse effects, dosage and administration, and place in therapy of telithromycin in the treatment of respiratory infections are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Telithromycin is the first ketolide to be approved in the United States for use against common respiratory pathogens. The unique structure of telithromycin allows for enhanced binding to bacterial ribosomal RNA, thereby blocking protein synthesis. Its spectrum of activity includes pathogens implicated in common respiratory infections (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumonia, and Chlamydia pneumoniae) and multidrug-resistant isolates of pneumococcus. Clinical efficacy has been documented in several multicenter, comparative trials for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, acute maxillary sinusitis, and pharyngitis tonsillitis. Although studies have demonstrated that the clinical efficacy of telithromycin is comparable to macrolides, telithromycin is unique in that it provides activity against penicillin- and macrolide-resistant respiratory pathogens. The recommended dosage of telithromycin is 800 mg p.o. once daily. The most common adverse events resulting from telithromycin use include diarrhea, nausea, headache, dizziness, vomiting, loose stools, dysgeusia, and dyspepsia. The drug's adverse-event profile is comparable to that of similar agents. Telithromycin is a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme 3A4; therefore, it can affect the efficacy and toxicity profile of medications that are metabolized by this isoenzyme.

CONCLUSION

Telithromycin is a reasonable addition to the current treatment options for upper-respiratory-tract infections. Its use should be restricted to infections caused by penicillin- and macrolide-resistant pathogens.

Occurrence and Characteristics of Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains Isolated in Three Major Brazilian States

We investigated the occurrence and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated in three major states in Brazil, from 1990 to 1999. Of the 931 pneumococcal strains evaluated, 40 (4.3%) were erythromycin-resistant (Ery-R). Among the 40 Ery-R strains, 90.0%, 80.0%, 27.5%, 5.0%, and 2.5% were resistant to tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, penicillin, chloramphenicol, and rifampin, respectively. None of the strains were resistant to ofloxacin or to vancomycin. Most [37 (92.5%)] of the 40 Ery-R isolates presented the MLS(B) phenotype and 3 (7.5%) strains showed the M phenotype. PCR testing indicated that all MLS(B) phenotype isolates harbored the erm(B) gene only, whereas the mef(A/E) gene was present in all isolates presenting the M phenotype. The tet(M) gene was the most frequent (86.1%) among Ery-R isolates that were also resistant to tetracycline. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis after SmaI digestion revealed the occurrence of clonal relationships within groups of strains belonging to serotypes 14, 19A, and 23F. All Ery-R isolates belonging to serotype 14 were susceptible to penicillin and were included in a single clonal group (named Ery(14)-A) related to the England(14-)9 internationally spread clone.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia in an Argentinian teaching hospital

Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates (n = 262) were recovered from adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Erythromycin-resistance levels increased from 9% (1997-1998) to 16% (2000-2002). Sampling for resistance mechanisms prevalent within 19 erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae showed mef(E) in 13/19 isolates while 4/19 carried the erm(B) gene (3/19 cMLS(B) and 1/19 iMLS(B) phenotype). MIC ranges for erythromycin and clindamycin were 0.5-16 mg/l and <0.008-0.063 mg/l for the M phenotype, 128-512 mg/l and 128-256 mg/l for the cMLS(B) phenotype, and 4 and <0.008 mg/l for the iMLS(B) phenotype. This is the first report studying the prevalence of macrolide resistance determinants in S. pneumoniae in our country.

Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations

BACKGROUND

The association between macrolide resistance mechanisms and ketolide bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae remains poorly studied. The present study, using an in vitro model, assessed telithromycin pharmacodynamic activity against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two macrolide-susceptible [PCR-negative for both mef(A) and erm(B)] and six macrolide-resistant [five mef(A)-positive/erm(B)-negative displaying various degrees of macrolide resistance and one mef(A)-negative/erm(B)-positive] S. pneumoniae were tested. Telithromycin was modelled simulating a dosage of 800 mg by mouth once daily [free serum: maximum concentration (C(max)) 0.7 mg/L, t(1/2) 10 h; and free ELF: C(max) 6.0 mg/L, t(1/2) 10 h]. Starting inocula were 1 x 10(6) cfu/mL in Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log(10) cfu/mL versus initial inoculum).

RESULTS

Telithromycin free serum concentrations achieved in the model were: C(max) 0.9+/-0.08 mg/L, AUC(0-24) 6.4+/-1.5 mg.h/L and t(1/2) of 10.6+/-1.6 h. Telithromycin free ELF concentrations achieved in the model were: C(max) 6.6+/-0.8 mg/L, AUC(0-24) 45.5+/-5.5 mg.h/L and t(1/2) of 10.5+/-1.7 h. At 2 h, free serum telithromycin concentrations achieved a 1.0-1.9 log(10) reduction in inoculum compared with a 3.0-3.3 log(10) reduction with free ELF versus macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. Free telithromycin serum and ELF concentrations simulating C(max)/MIC > or =14.1 and area under the curve to MIC (AUC(0-24)/MIC) > or =100 [time above the MIC (t > MIC) of 100%], were bactericidal (> or =3 log(10) killing) at 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h versus macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae.

CONCLUSION

Telithromycin serum and ELF concentrations rapidly eradicated macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae regardless of resistance phenotype. Achieving C(max)/MIC > or =14.1 and AUC(0-24)/MIC > or =100 resulted in bactericidal activity at 4 h with no regrowth over 48 h.

Ketolide antimicrobial activity persists after disruption of interactions with domain II of 23S rRNA

Ketolides are the latest derivatives developed from the macrolide erythromycin to improve antimicrobial activity. All macrolides and ketolides bind to the 50S ribosomal subunit, where they come into contact with adenosine 2058 (A2058) within domain V of the 23S rRNA and block protein synthesis. An additional interaction at nucleotide A752 in the rRNA domain II is made via the synthetic carbamate-alkyl-aryl substituent in the ketolides HMR3647 (telithromycin) and HMR3004, and this interaction contributes to their improved activities. Only a few macrolides, including tylosin, come into contact with domain II of the rRNA and do so via interactions with nucleotides G748 and A752. We have disrupted these macrolide-ketolide interaction sites in the rRNA to assess their relative importance for binding. Base substitutions at A752 were shown to confer low levels of resistance to telithromycin but not to HMR3004, while deletion of A752 confers low levels of resistance to both ketolides. Mutations at position 748 confer no resistance. Substitution of guanine at A2058 gives rise to the MLS(B) (macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B) phenotype, which confers resistance to all the drugs. However, resistance to ketolides was abolished when the mutation at position 2058 was combined with a mutation in domain II of the same rRNA. In contrast, the same dual mutations in rRNAs conferred enhanced resistance to tylosin. Our results show that the domain II interactions of telithromycin and HMR3004 differ from each other and from those of tylosin. The data provide no indication that mutations within domain II, either alone or in combination with an A2058 mutation, can confer significant levels of telithromycin resistance.

Ketolides: an emerging treatment for macrolide-resistant respiratory infections, focusing on S. pneumoniae

Resistance to antibiotics in community acquired respiratory infections is increasing worldwide. Resistance to the macrolides can be class-specific, as in efflux or ribosomal mutations, or, in the case of erythromycin ribosomal methylase (erm)-mediated resistance, may generate cross-resistance to other related classes. The ketolides are a new subclass of macrolides specifically designed to combat macrolide-resistant respiratory pathogens. X-ray crystallography indicates that ketolides bind to a secondary region in domain II of the 23S rRNA subunit, resulting in an improved structure-activity relationship. Telithromycin and cethromycin (formerly ABT-773) are the two most clinically advanced ketolides, exhibiting greater activity towards both typical and atypical respiratory pathogens. As a subclass of macrolides, ketolides demonstrate potent activity against most macrolide-resistant streptococci, including ermB- and macrolide efflux (mef)A-positive Streptococcus pneumoniae. Their pharmacokinetics display a long half-life as well as extensive tissue distribution and uptake into respiratory tissues and fluids, allowing for once-daily dosing. Clinical trials focusing on respiratory infections indicate bacteriological and clinical cure rates similar to comparators, even in patients infected with macrolide-resistant strains.

A review of clinical failures associated with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The emerging reports of clinical failures using macrolides and their associations with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae prompted us to review the literature describing these cases. Thirty-three cases reporting macrolide treatment failure during treatment of pneumococcal infections were available for review. The most prevalent diagnosis (24/27 or 88.8% of available diagnoses) was community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Previous medical history included cardiopulmonary disease in eight (24.2%) and immunocompromised states in five (15.1%) patients. The majority, 31/33 (93.9%) of patients received oral macrolide treatment in an outpatient setting. S. pneumoniae was isolated from the blood in 26 (78.8%) of 33 patients, three (9.1%) patients had bacteria present in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid, two (6%) patients grew S. pneumoniae from blood and bronchial washings and two (6%) patients had positive sputum cultures. The MLS(B) phenotype was the most predominant phenotype present in 12 (63.2%) of 19 patients. After failing initial macrolide treatment, 26 (78.8%) of 33 patients received parenteral antibiotic treatment. Of 33 patients admitted to hospital, 29 (87.8%) had their outcome described as 'survived'.

Characterization and prevalence of MefA, MefE, and the associated msr(D) gene in Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates

Recent work has shown that the efflux genes in Streptococcus pneumoniae that are responsible for acquired macrolide resistance can be distinguished as either mef(E) or mef(A). The genetic elements on which mef(A) and mef(E) are found also carry an open reading frame (ORF) that is 56% homologous to msr(A) in Staphylococcus. The prevalence of mef(A/E) and of the msr-like ORF [msr(D)] was evaluated in 153 mef(+) S. pneumoniae clinical isolates collected in North America, Europe, Africa, and Asia from 1997 to 2002. Clinical isolates were screened with PCR primers specific for either mef(A) or mef(E) and for msr(D). mef(A), mef(E), and msr(D) were cloned from mef(+) strains and transformed into a susceptible, competent strain of S. pneumoniae. The transformants were tested for antimicrobial susceptibilities and efflux pump induction. The results of this work demonstrated that mef(A) is more often isolated in parts of Europe, with some incidence in Canada, and that the msr-like gene alone can confer the efflux phenotype.

High prevalence of the ermB gene among erythromycin-resistant streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Germany during the winter of 2000-2001 and in vitro activity of telithromycin

Of 595 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from outpatients with respiratory tract infections, collected from 17 microbiology laboratories, 14.1% were resistant to erythromycin. Eighty-three erythromycin-resistant isolates were genetically analyzed, 83.1% of which harbored the ermB gene. Only four isolates (4.8%) harbored the mefA gene. Telithromycin exhibited potent activity against all isolates.

Impact of Ketolides on Resistance Selection and Ecologic Effects during Treatment for Respiratory Tract Infections

Ketolides are a new class of antibacterials that have been specifically developed for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections in an era of increasing resistance among major etiologic pathogens. These agents possess several unique structural features, including a 3-keto function and a large aromatic side chain, that confer not only a mode of action that differentiates them from the macrolide class but also a reduced potential to induce--or select for--resistant strains. Studies also suggest that ketolides such as telithromycin have a lower ecologic impact on the body's microflora than agents such as clarithromycin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, potentially reducing the risk of emergence of resistant strains and the spread of such resistance to pathogenic species. Therefore, available evidence suggests that ketolides may not only provide important new treatment options in an era of increasing resistance but may also contribute to reducing the pressure for development of further resistance. Clearly, further studies are required to confirm this low resistance potential once the ketolide agents become more widely used in routine practice.

Macrolide resistance in Streptococci and Haemophilus influenzae

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among pathogens from respiratory tract infections. b-Lactam resistance rates are escalating among Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. Macrolides are increasingly used for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, but their utility is compromised by intrinsic and acquired resistance. This article analyses macrolide-resistance mechanisms and their worldwide distributions in S pneumoniae, S pyogenes, and H influenzae.

Tn2009, a Tn916-like element containing mef(E) in Streptococcus pneumoniae

The association between the macrolide efflux gene mef(E) and the tet(M) gene was studied in two clinical strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae that belonged to serotypes 19F and 6A, respectively, and that were resistant to both tetracycline and erythromycin. The mef(E)-carrying element mega (macrolide efflux genetic assembly; 5,511 bp) was found to be inserted into a Tn916-like genetic element present in the chromosomes of the two pneumococcal strains. In both strains, mega was integrated at the same site, an open reading frame identical to orf6 of Tn916. The new composite element, Tn2009, was about 23.5 kb and, with the exception of the tet(M)-coding sequence, appeared to be identical in both strains. By sequencing of the junction fragments of Tn2009 at the site of insertion into the chromosome, it was possible to show that (i) the insertion site was identical in the two clinical strains and (ii) the integration of Tn2009 caused a 9.5 kb-deletion in the pneumococcal chromosome. It was not possible to detect the conjugal transfer of Tn2009 to a recipient pneumococcal strain; however, transfer of the whole element by transformation was shown to occur. It is possible to hypothesize that Tn2009 relies on transformation for its spread among clinical strains of S. pneumoniae.

Comparative in vitro activity of antiribosomal agents on penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in relation to their resistance genotypes

A collection of 326 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from blood, cerebrospinal fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage, transtracheal aspirate or sputum from January 1996-June 2002 were included in this study. The activity of clarithromycin, clindamycin, telithromycin, linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin against penicillin G and erythromycin A susceptible and resistant pneumococci were determined; the erythromycin A resistance phenotypes and genotypes were identified and susceptibilities of these agents were assessed according to the resistance genotypes. MICs were determined for all strains of pneumococci using an agar dilution method. MLS(B) resistance phenotypes were determined by the double disk (erythromycin A and clindamycin) diffusion method. Genetic determinants for macrolide resistance were identified by PCR using primers specific for erm(B) and mef(A). Erythromycin A resistance was detected in 13.8% of the strains. MLS(B) resistance phenotype was observed in 82% of these (60% being cMLS(B) and 40% being iMLS(B)), and M type resistance in about 18%. All the MLS(B) phenotype strains except four, revealed the presence of erm(B) gene and all except one M phenotype strains revealed the mef(A) gene. Of the erythromycin A resistant pneumococci about 49% were also resistant to clindamycin. No strains were resistant to telithromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid. Telithromycin had the lowest MIC values for both erythromycin A resistant and susceptible strains of all the antiribosomal agents tested. The most prevalent mechanism of macrolide resistance was mediated by the erm(B) gene leading to the expression of MLS(B) phenotype. Telithromycin was the most active antiribosomal agent, regardless of the macrolide resistance genotype of the pneumococci tested.

Clarithromycin in 2003: sustained efficacy and safety in an era of rising antibiotic resistance

Data from surveillance studies show increasing prevalence of respiratory pathogens resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Thus, a Medline search was conducted to identify studies of clarithromycin, especially those addressing macrolide resistance. Changing trends of in vitro susceptibility have not affected clinical efficacy with clarithromycin. Over the last 12 years, clarithromycin study results have shown consistent rates of clinical cure and bacteriological eradication, which are similar to those observed with comparator agents. The incidence of clarithromycin treatment failure in patients infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae is substantially less than that predicted by macrolide resistance rates from surveillance programmes. In summary, despite widespread use since its introduction, clarithromycin remains active both in vitro and in vivo against clinically relevant respiratory tract pathogens.

Novel antibacterial class

We report the discovery and characterization of a novel ribosome inhibitor (NRI) class that exhibits selective and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Compounds in this class inhibit growth of many gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including the common respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Moraxella catarrhalis, and are nontoxic to human cell lines. The first NRI was discovered in a high-throughput screen designed to identify inhibitors of cell-free translation in extracts from S. pneumoniae. The chemical structure of the NRI class is related to antibacterial quinolones, but, interestingly, the differences in structure are sufficient to completely alter the biochemical and intracellular mechanisms of action. Expression array studies and analysis of NRI-resistant mutants confirm this difference in intracellular mechanism and provide evidence that the NRIs inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by inhibiting ribosomes. Furthermore, compounds in the NRI series appear to inhibit bacterial ribosomes by a new mechanism, because NRI-resistant strains are not cross-resistant to other ribosome inhibitors, such as macrolides, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, aminoglycosides, or oxazolidinones. The NRIs are a promising new antibacterial class with activity against all major drug-resistant respiratory pathogens.

Ketolides: a new class of antibacterial agents for treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections in a primary care setting

Pathogens implicated in community-acquired respiratory tract infections are becoming increasingly resistant to anti-bacterial therapies. Thus, there is an urgent need for new agents with activity against current resistant respiratory tract pathogens and a low potential to select for resistance or induce cross-resistance to existing antibacterial agents. Telithromycin, the first ketolide antibacterial agent to undergo clinical development, has enhanced binding to bacterial ribosomal RNA. Through its unique structure, telithromycin retains activity against resistant respiratory pathogens and has shown high efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections. On the basis of phase 3 clinical trial experience, telithromycin appears safe and well tolerated across various patient populations, including high-risk groups.

Activity of telithromycin and seven other agents against 1034 pediatric Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from ten central and eastern European centers

OBJECTIVE

To test the activity of telithromycin against 1034 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from pediatric patients in ten centers from ten central and eastern European countries during 2000-2001, and to compare it with the activities of erythromycin A, azithromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of telithromycin, erythromycin A, azithromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, levofloxacin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and penicillin G were tested by the agar dilution method with incubation in air, and mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and quinolones were investigated.

RESULTS

Strains were isolated from sputum, tracheal aspirates, ear, eye, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid. Among S. pneumoniae strains tested, 36% had raised penicillin G MICs (>/= 0.12 mg/L). Susceptibilities were as follows: telithromycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and levofloxacin, >/= 99%; clindamycin, 83%; and erythromycin A, azithromycin and clarithromycin, 78%. Of 230 (22.3%) erythromycin A-resistant S. pneumoniae strains, 176 (79.6%) had erm(B), 38 (16.1%) had mef(A), and 10 (4.3%) had mutations in 23S ribosomal RNA or in ribosomal protein L4. The rates of drug-resistant S. pneumoniae are high in all centers except Kaunas, Riga, and Prague.

CONCLUSION

Telithromycin had low MICs against all strains, irrespective of macrolide, azalide or clindamycin resistance. Ribosomal methylation was the most prevalent resistance mechanism among all resistant strains, except in Sofia, where the prevalence of the efflux mechanism was higher.

Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory tract Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates: results of the Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study, 1997 to 2002

A total of 6,991 unique patient isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected from October 1997 to June 2002 from 25 medical centers in 9 of the 10 Canadian provinces. Among these isolates, 20.2% were penicillin nonsusceptible, with 14.6% being penicillin intermediate (MIC, 0.12 to 1 microg/ml) and 5.6% being penicillin resistant (MIC, > or =2 microg/ml). The proportion of high-level penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates increased from 2.4 to 13.8% over the last 3 years of the study, and the proportion of multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates increased from 2.7 to 8.8% over the 5-year period. Resistant rates (intermediate and resistant) among non-beta-lactam agents were as follows: macrolides, 9.6 to 9.9%; clindamycin, 3.8%; doxycycline, 5.5%; chloramphenicol, 3.9%; and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 19.0%. Rates of resistance to non-beta-lactam agents were higher among penicillin-resistant strains than among penicillin-susceptible strains. No resistance to vancomycin or linezolid was observed; however, 0.1% intermediate resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin was observed. The rate of macrolide resistance (intermediate and resistant) increased from 7.9 to 11.1% over the 5 years. For the fluoroquinolones, the order of activity based on the MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)s) and the MIC(90)s was gemifloxacin > clinafloxacin > trovafloxacin > moxifloxacin > grepafloxacin > gatifloxacin > levofloxacin > ciprofloxacin. The investigational compounds ABT-773 (MIC(90), 0.008 microg/ml), ABT-492 (MIC(90), 0.015 microg/ml), GAR-936 (tigecycline; MIC(90), 0.06 microg/ml), and BMS284756 (garenoxacin; MIC(90), 0.06 micro g/ml) displayed excellent activities. Despite decreases in the rates of antibiotic consumption in Canada over the 5-year period, the rates of both high-level penicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates are increasing in Canada.

Pathogen of occurrence and susceptibility patterns associated with pneumonia in hospitalized patients in North America: results of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study (2000)

Antimicrobial selection for patients diagnosed with pneumonia is a major therapeutic challenge and dilemma to the clinical practitioner. In the community setting, patients usually receive empiric oral therapy based upon multiple patient risk factors and locally prevalent pathogen susceptibilities. For patients admitted to the hospital with pneumonia, or who acquire pneumonia while in the hospital, therapy can be initially empiric and then become directed once culture and susceptibility results are known. The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program since 1997, has monitored pathogen frequency and antimicrobial susceptibilities in hospitalized patients with pneumonia in North America. In this Study 2,712 pathogens were studied from 30 medical centers (25 in the United States and 5 in Canada). Over 30 species of organisms were recovered with Staphylococcus aureus comprising 28.0% of all isolates and with four other species (Pseudomonas aeruginosa 20.0%, Streptococcus pneumoniae 9.1%, Klebsiella spp. 7.5% and Haemophilus influenzae 7.3%) constituted 71.9% of isolates submitted. Methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant S. aureus accounted for 43.7% of all S. aureus isolates. Antimicrobials demonstrating significant (>80%) activity against S. aureus were: chloramphenicol (81.6%), tetracycline (91.4%), rifampin (96.4%) and quinupristin/dalfopristin (99.7%); and no isolate was resistant to glycopeptides or linezolid. North American isolates of P. aeruginosa were most susceptible to amikacin (93.7%) > tobramycin (90.2%) > meropenem (89.1%) > imipenem = piperacillin/tazobactam (85.6%) > piperacillin (82.1%) > cefepime (80.5%). Overall, 32.1% of S. pneumoniae were penicillin non-susceptible while erythromycin susceptibility was only 74.8%. Fluoroquinolones and recent generation cephalosporins retained excellent activity (gatifloxacin [99.2%] > levofloxacin = cefepime [98.8%] > ceftriaxone [97.2%]) against S. pneumoniae. Klebsiella spp. were 100.0% susceptible to the carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem) but extended spectrum beta-lactamases were detected at a rate of 5.4%. The beta-lactamase-positive rate in H. influenzae was 28.6% in North America (71.4% ampicillin-susceptible). The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program continues to identify important North American patterns of pathogen frequency and resistance. Additionally, the provision of multi-year longitudinal data and associated reports allow for comparisons, which function as critical tools for effective patient management and antimicrobial interventions.

The era of antimicrobial resistance-implications for the clinical laboratory

The emergence of resistance to antimicrobial drugs in a range of bacterial pathogens of the respiratory tract creates a challenge for the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Resistance to macrolides among strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae has reached high levels in many countries. There are two main types of resistance mechanisms, one (MLSB phenotype) leading to high-level resistance and the other (M phenotype) resulting in a lower level of resistance. As there are indications that high-level resistance may have clinical relevance, it is important to be able to detect such strains. This is now possible with the erythromycin/clindamycin double disc diffusion test. Although resistance to beta-lactams has also increased, there is now evidence that some beta-lactams are still effective against isolates that have low-level resistance. In response to these observations, new breakpoints have now been introduced by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for amoxicillin, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, which increase the percentage of pneumococcal isolates that can still be treated effectively with these agents. As a consequence of the increasing use of fluoroquinolones, resistance has now emerged to this group of compounds and this has been associated with clinical failures. Although standard minimum inhibitory concentration tests can detect strains with high levels of resistance (double step mutants) they are not reliable in detecting strains with a single mutation. This is important as there is increasing evidence that strains with a single mutation in the target topoisomerase are even more likely to develop a second mutation, leading to higher levels of resistance and thus probably, therapeutic failure. Because resistance to fluoroquinolones is currently low in the US, the NCCLS does not recommend that susceptibility testing with the newer respiratory fluoroquinolones be carried out routinely. However, since the respiratory fluoroquinolones have in fact become the first line of therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, it may now be time to institute routine testing of clinical isolates of pneumococci to these agents. Simple techniques for the clinical diagnostic laboratory to enable these first-step mutants to be detected are urgently required.