Effect of ribavirin on intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus coinfection: results of a randomized clinical study

Associated factors of drug-drug interactions of highly active antiretroviral therapy: report from a referral center

OBJECTIVE

To assess different aspects of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) including incidence, severity, level of evidence and probable associated factors in Iranian HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

All adult HIV-infected patients under highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen attending a referral HIV clinic during 1 year were screened retrospectively for potential moderate or severe DDIs by the Lexi-Interact On-Desktop software.

RESULTS

Near seventy percent (69.89%) of detected DDIs in our population were major. The three most common detected potential DDIs were efavirenz + methadone (11 cases), lopinavir-ritonavir + sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, (10 cases) and lamivudine + ribavirin (7 cases). Lopinavir-ritonavir (27.96%) and citalopram (23.66%) were the most common offending antiretroviral and non-antiretroviral agents, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Performing multicenter and prospective studies is warranted to assess the real clinical as well as economic impacts of DDIs on HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral agents in our population and also to develop efficient preventive strategies.

Absence of Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Ribavirin and Tenofovir in Healthy Subjects

This was a 36-day, open-label, fixed-sequence, multiple-dose drug interaction study in 23 healthy subjects to evaluate the effects of multiple doses of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ribavirin. Subjects received a 600-mg once-daily oral dose of ribavirin on days 1 and 22 and 300-mg once-daily oral doses of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on days 17 through 24. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 through 4 and 22 through 25. Pharmacokinetics of ribavirin was not altered by its coadministration with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as the point estimates (day 22 [test treatment]/day 1 [reference treatment]), and the 90% confidence interval for maximum observed concentration (0.95; 88.7-101) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to time of last measurable concentration (1.12; 106-117) were within the equivalence bounds of 80% to 125%. Tenofovir pharmacokinetics after ribavirin coadministration was similar to that observed in previous studies. These results indicate that coadministration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and ribavirin does not result in substantial changes to their individual pharmacokinetic profiles.

Effect of an induction period of pegylated interferon-α2a and ribavirin on early virological response in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients: results from the CORAL-2 study

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain whether a 4-week induction period of pegylated interferon and ribavirin increases early virological response (EVR) in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients.

METHODS

HIV and HCV genotype 1- and 4-coinfected subjects were randomized to receive pegylated interferon-α2a 270 μg/week plus ribavirin 1,600 mg daily and epoetin-β for 4 weeks, followed by pegylated interferon-α2a at standard dosages plus weight-based ribavirin (WBR) dosage for 8 weeks (induction arm [IA]), or pegylated interferon-α2a plus WBR for 12 weeks (standard therapy arm [SA]). HCV RNA was determined at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12. Ribavirin plasma trough concentrations were determined at weeks 4 (RBV-C(4)) and 12 (RBV-C(12)).

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were included; 33 in the SA and 34 in the IA. Overall, 25% received nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens. More patients achieved an HCV RNA decrease ≥1 log(10) at week 4 in the IA than in the SA (62% versus 38%; P=0.017), but EVR rates were similar in the two groups (74% versus 59% in the IA and SA, respectively; P=0.15). Independent predictors of faster HCV RNA decrease at 12 weeks were higher RBV-C(4) and younger age. RBV-C(4) were higher in patients allocated in the IA and in those receiving NRTIs (P=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-week induction with pegylated interferon-α2a plus ribavirin was associated with a greater decrease in HCV RNA at week 4; however, this did not translate into higher EVR rates. Higher RBV doses and avoidance of NRTI-sparing antiretroviral regimens might improve HCV treatment efficacy.

Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of raltegravir and ribavirin, when dosed separately and together, in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in HIV-1-co-infected individuals remains challenging due to numerous factors, including drug-drug interactions. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of raltegravir and ribavirin when dosed separately and together.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers [mean (standard deviation) age 35 (10) years, 71% male] entered this phase 1 PK study and received single-dose ribavirin (800 mg) on day 1 (phase 1). Following a washout period, subjects received raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) on days 15-19 (phase 2) and single-dose ribavirin (800 mg) with raltegravir (400 mg) on day 20 (phase 3). Intensive PK sampling was undertaken on days 1, 19 and 20 and differences in geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for PK parameters between study periods were assessed.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in PK parameters were observed for raltegravir between phases 2 and 3. A statistically significant decrease in maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and an increase in time to maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) were observed for ribavirin in phase 3 compared with phase 1 [GMR (95% confidence interval) 0.79 (0.62-1.00) and 1.39 (1.08-1.78), respectively], whereas no significant differences in other ribavirin PK parameters were observed between study phases. No clinically significant safety concerns were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK profile of ribavirin is altered when administered with raltegravir (reduced C(max) and increased T(max)), with no safety concerns identified. This is unlikely to be of clinical significance or have an impact on the antiviral effects of ribavirin in HIV-1- and HCV-co-infected subjects.

Antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C in patients with human immunodeficiency virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C may be less effective if patients are co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C in patients with HIV.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through manual and electronic searches in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded. The last search was May 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing at least 12 weeks of any anti-HCV treatment versus another treatment regimen or no treatment. Included patients had chronic hepatitis C and stable HIV irrespective of previous antiviral therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were done in duplicate. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen trials were included. None of the included 2269 patients were previously treated for chronic hepatitis C. Peginterferon (either 2a, 180 microgram, or 2b, 1.5 microgram/kg, once weekly) plus ribavirin was more effective in achieving end of treatment and sustained virological response compared with interferon plus ribavirin (5 trials, 1340 patients) or peginterferon (2 trials, 714 patients). The benefit of peginterferon plus ribavirin was seen irrespective of HCV genotype although patients with genotype 1 or 4 had lower response rates (27%) than patients with genotype 2 or 3 (56%). The remaining trials compared different treatment regimens in patients who were treatment naive or had no virological response after three months of treatment, but overall they had not enough power to show any effect of increasing the dose of interferon or adding both amantadine or ribavirin. The overall mortality was 23/2111 patients with no significant differences between treatment regimens. Treatment increased the risk of adverse events including anaemia and flu-like symptoms, and several serious adverse events occurred including fatal lactic acidosis, liver failure, and suicide due to depression.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Peginterferon plus ribavirin may be considered a treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C and stable HIV who have not received treatment for hepatitis C as the intervention may clear the blood of HCV RNA. Supporting evidence comes mainly from the analysis of this non-validated surrogate outcome assessed in comparisons against other antiviral treatments. There is no evidence on treatment of patients who have relapsed or did not respond to previous therapy. Careful monitoring of adverse events is warranted.

Abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combination antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV

In the past 15 years, improvements in the treatment of HIV infection have dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are the backbone of combination antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV. One of the recommended and commonly used therapies in this class is the once-daily fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine. Clinical studies and practice have shown these drugs to be potent, safe, and easy to use in a variety of settings; however, several recent reports have challenged the safety and efficacy claims among certain patient populations, including those at risk for cardiovascular disease and in those with high viral loads prior to treatment initiation. We reviewed abacavir/lamivudine as a treatment for HIV and discussed limitations of its use due to these controversial issues.

Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of anti-HIV nucleoside analogs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent developments regarding the unique clinical pharmacologic profile of nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors for management of HIV.

RECENT FINDINGS

First, intracellular data in patients suggest that nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-triphosphates are compartmentalized in different cell types. Additionally, intracellular drug-drug interactions were identified, which were undetectable in plasma. Second, extracellular data illustrate multiple bidirectional plasma drug-drug interactions between renally eliminated tenofovir and liver-metabolized drugs. Definitive mechanistic details for these interactions are lacking but they appear to involve renal and/or enteric drug transporters. Furthermore, the plasma versus female genital tract disposition of these agents was recently elucidated, which is important for currently investigated indications for pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis. Finally, tenofovir/emtricitabine and abacavir (using a promising human leukocyte antigen-B*5701 genetic test for hypersensitivity)/lamivudine have emerged as common first-line nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors because of co-formulations, once-daily dosing, and favorable tolerability and adverse effect profiles. Nevertheless, elucidating the long-term safety profile for all nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors remains a priority.

SUMMARY

Knowledge of nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor disposition intracellularly and extracellularly has expanded. This provides a basis for rational use of these agents clinically and adds new perspectives for future research.

[Role of tenofovir in HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection]

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in HIV-infected individuals, especially if the route of infection is intravenous (e.g. intravenous drug use or blood transfusion). Prognosis is poorer in patients with HCV and HIV coinfection than in those with HCV monoinfection, mainly due to the immunodepression caused by HIV infection and probably also to a direct effect of HIV on the liver. Moreover, although antiretroviral therapy can cause liver damage, there is little doubt about the net benefits obtained with triple therapy in coinfected individuals, since suppression of HIV replication and immune recovery help to halt liver damage. However, not all antiretroviral agents are equal and those with the lowest hepatotoxicity and best metabolic profile should be used in coinfected patients, since hepatic steatosis accelerates progression of hepatic fibrosis and insulin resistance hampers the success of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. Tenofovir is currently one of the safest nucleos(t)ide analogues, due to its low hepatotoxicity and its lack of negative interference on treatment of HCV infection.

Trends in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Despite reductions in the incidence of new hepatitis C virus infections, infections from previous decades continue to place a substantial burden on our health care system. Although the course of the disease is highly variable, approximately 20% to 30% of patients develop cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Fortunately, treatment with our current standard of care, peginterferon a and ribavirin, can reduce the complications of chronic liver disease. However, these drugs are associated with significant adverse effects, many patients are ineligible for treatment, and only 50% are cured. Thus, there is a tremendous need to improve our current therapies and develop new compounds for this disease. This review highlights the transmission, pathophysiology, and course of illness; the pharmacokinetics, proposed mechanisms of action, adverse events, and potential drug interactions with peginterferon a and ribavirin; current treatment trends; the role of the pharmacist in the treatment of this disease; and investigational drugs in later stages of clinical development. Despite the initial hope that these new drugs would replace our current standard of care, it has become clear that ribavirin and peginterferon a will continue to play an important role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus in the years to come.

Cytokine and sex hormone effects on zidovudine- and lamivudine-triphosphate concentrations in vitro

INTRODUCTION

Elevated zidovudine- and lamivudine-triphosphates have been observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from females versus males and in patients with high inflammatory states versus lower inflammatory states. Consistent with high triphosphate exposures, these same patient groups also experience elevated rates of toxicity, including lipoatrophy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of oestradiol, progesterone and testosterone as well as tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interferon (IFN)-alpha on zidovudine- and lamivudine-triphosphates in PBMCs and, for the cytokines, in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

METHODS

Multiple replicates of adipocytes and human PBMCs were incubated with experimental versus control conditions using several cytokine and sex hormone doses. Zidovudine- and lamivudine-triphosphate concentrations were determined with validated LC-MS-MS assays. A mixed effects, cell means model that accounted for experiment number was used to evaluate the effects of experimental conditions relative to control.

RESULTS

In adipocytes, TNF-alpha doses below 2 ng/mL increased zidovudine-triphosphate by 18% (5-31%). Lamivudine-triphosphate was not detectable in adipocytes. In PBMCs, pooled IFN-alpha doses (0.1-10 U/mL) decreased zidovudine-triphosphate 26% (10-42%); 100 and 1000 ng/mL of progesterone decreased lamivudine-triphosphate by 22% (1-43%) and 47% (25-68%), respectively. Pooled testosterone doses (10-1000 ng/mL) decreased lamivudine-triphosphate by 24% (7-41%). No other statistically significant effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence that sex hormones and cytokines influence zidovudine-triphosphate and lamivudine-triphosphate slightly in PBMCs and adipocytes in vitro. These findings provide insight and scientific direction to address inflammation-dependent and sex-dependent phosphorylation and responses in patients.

High levels of zidovudine (AZT) and its intracellular phosphate metabolites in AZT- and AZT-lamivudine-treated newborns of human immunodeficiency virus-infected mothers

Newborns from human immunodeficiency virus-infected mothers are given antiretroviral prophylaxis against mother-to-child transmission, including predominantly nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Pharmacological monitoring of these drugs in newborns has so far been limited to plasma and cord blood. In this study, samples from newborns (up to 45 days old) treated with zidovudine (AZT) alone (n = 29) or in combination with lamivudine (3TC) (n = 20) were analyzed for both intracellular concentrations of phosphate metabolites in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and levels of parent drugs in plasma. Plasma AZT and intracellular AZT-monophosphate and AZT-triphosphate (TP) concentrations were significantly higher during the first 15 days of life (199 versus 52.7 ng/ml [P < 0.0001], 732 versus 282 fmol/10(6) cells [P < 0.0001], and 170 versus 65.1 fmol/10(6) cells [P < 0.0001], respectively) and then became comparable to those of adults. No difference in intracellular AZT metabolite concentrations was found when AZT- and AZT-3TC-treated groups were compared. Plasma 3TC levels (lower limit of quantification [LLOQ], 1,157 ng/ml; median, 412.5 ng/ml) were not associated with the newborn's age, gender, or weight. Intracellular 3TC-TP concentrations (LLOQ, 40.4 pmol/10(6) cells; median, 18.9 pmol/10(6) cells) determined for newborns receiving the AZT-3TC combination were associated with neither the age nor weight of the newborns. Concentrations in females were significantly higher (1.8-fold [P = 0.0415]) than those in males. Unexpectedly, newborns on AZT monotherapy whose mothers' treatment included 3TC displayed residual plasma 3TC and intracellular 3TC-TP levels up to 1 week after birth.

Low Response to Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin in HIV-Infected Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Treated with Abacavir

Background

There is little information about the influence of antiretroviral drugs on the antiviral activity of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) against hepatitis C virus (HCV).

Methods

All HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C who received first-line PEG-IFN plus RBV were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients in whom virological stopping rules were applied and who did not change their antiretrovirals were chosen. Plasma RBV concentrations were measured at week 4.

Results

A total of 493 patients (78% males, mean age 41 years, 78% on antiretroviral therapy, mean CD4+ T-cell count 561 cells/μl) fit the study inclusion criteria. Mean baseline serum HCV RNA was 5.89 log10 IU/ml, 65% were infected by genotypes 1 or 4 and 40% had advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3F4). The overall rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 38%. Factors associated with lack of SVR in the multivariate analyses (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], P-value) were higher baseline serum HCV RNA (2.42 per log10 IU/ml [1.31–4.46], 0.005), HCV genotypes 1 or 4 (5.95 [2.50–14.29], <0.001) and lower RBV plasma trough concentrations (1.74 per μg/ml [1.15–2.63], 0.009). Interestingly, a trend was noticed for abacavir use (2.22 [0.91–5.40], 0.08), which become significant when only considering the subset of patients with RBV plasma levels <2.3 μg/ml (7.63 [1.39–41.67], 0.02).

Conclusions

The use of abacavir might interfere with the anti-HCV activity of PEG-IFN plus RBV. As both antivirals are guanosine analogues, an inhibitory competition between abacavir and RBV might explain this observation, which is more prominent in patients with lower RBV exposure.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the effects of ribavirin on zidovudine triphosphate formation: ACTG 5092s Study Team

OBJECTIVES

Ribavirin (RBV) is used for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in subjects with HIV-1 infection who may require antiretroviral treatment (ART) with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors including zidovudine (ZDV). We sought to investigate the potential antagonism between RBV and ZDV by evaluating the impact of RBV on the formation of intracellular ZDV triphosphate (TP) in HIV-infected patients receiving ZDV who were treated for HCV infection.

METHODS

Serial plasma and intracellular ZDV TP pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined in 14 subjects at entry (within 2 weeks prior to RBV administration) and at 8 weeks following initiation of RBV. Intracellular ZDV TP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was quantified by a validated cartridge/liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. PK exposure was estimated from the steady-state area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC(0-12 h)) in plasma and PBMC.

RESULTS

Ribavirin did not have a statistically significant impact on ZDV TP AUC(0-12 h), plasma ZDV AUC(0-12 h) or the ratio of ZDV TP AUC(0-12 h) to plasma ZDV AUC(0-12 h), although there was a trend towards an increase post-RBV ratio compared with pre-RBV. There was extensive variability in the ZDV TP AUC(0-12 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin did not inhibit formation of ZDV TP in PBMC in 14 patients receiving ZDV as part of ART and RBV-based HCV therapy for 8 weeks. These results are consistent with those of a previously published limited study in seven subjects. These PK findings should be weighed carefully against emerging clinical reports of significant anaemia associated with combination ZDV and high-dose RBV therapy.

Nanomedicines in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C co-infected with HIV--focus on pegylated interferon-alpha

In immuno-competent individuals, the natural course of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly variable and 5%–30% of patients develop cirrhosis over 20 years. Co-infection with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an important prognostic factor and associated with more frequent and accelerated progression to cirrhosis. Until recently HIV/AIDS-related complications were life limiting in patients co-infected with HCV; the introduction of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) and the better prognosis of HIV infection has made HCV-related complications an emerging health problem in HCV/HIV co-infected individuals. Treatment of chronic HCV infection has also evolved since the introduction of interferon-alpha. Recently, introduction of pegylated interferon-alpha (peginterferon-alpha) has resulted in an increase in sustained virus clearance rates of up to 80% in selected genotypes and patient populations. The safety and efficacy of modern anti HCV treatment regimens – based on peginterferon-alpha in combination with ribavirin – was evaluated in 4 controlled trials. Sustained clearance of hepatitis C virus can be achieved in up to 35% of patients with HIV/HCV co-infection, and novel HCV treatment regimens based on peginterferon-alpha have no negative effect on the control of HIV disease. In conclusion, if HIV infection is well controlled and CD4⁺ cell counts >100/mm³, treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon in combination with ribavirin is safe and should be given for 48 weeks regardless of the HCV genotype. Introduction of peginterferon-alpha has significantly improved adherence to treatment and treatment efficacy; in particular sustained virologic response in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection improved, but sustained viral clearance in only 7%–38% of patients infected with genotype 1 and 4 cannot be the final step in development of effective treatments in patients with HCV/HIV co-infection.

Hepatitis C in the HIV-infected patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection in the presence of HIV raises several challenging issues for the treating clinician. Some evidence indicates that concomitant HIV infection alters HCV virology in ways that are relevant for treatment. Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is the recommended therapy for HCV in HIV-infected patients. Proportionately fewer HIV/HCV-coinfected patients achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) compared with those infected with HCV alone. Possible reasons for this include higher levels of HCV viremia and inadequate ribavirin exposure. Strategies under study for optimizing therapeutic response include weight-based ribavirin dosing, use of growth factors to avoid dose reduction, and longer duration of therapy. Aggressive management of adverse effects to avoid dose reduction or treatment discontinuation is also crucial. An integrated multidisciplinary team, including a psychiatrist and addictions specialist, can increase the proportion of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients eligible for treatment. Investigational options exist for patients who relapse after treatment is discontinued and for those with a partial virologic response. Promising therapies that are under development include protease and polymerase inhibitors.

Role of weight-based ribavirin dosing and extended duration of therapy in chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients: the PRESCO trial

The response to pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) as treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is lower in HIV-coinfected than in HCV-monoinfected patients and could be due to suboptimal RBV dosing and/or insufficient duration of therapy in prior trials. In a prospective, multicenter, open, comparative trial, HCV/HIV-coinfected patients received pegIFN plus weight-based RBV for 48 or 72 weeks (HCV genotypes 1 and 4) and 24 or 48 weeks (HCV genotypes 2 and 3). Use of didanosine was not allowed. Out of 389 patients included in the trial, 61% were infected by HCV-1/4 and 67% had serum HCV-RNA >500,000 IU/ml. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved by 49.6%, significantly higher in HCV-2/3 than HCV-1/4 (72.4% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001). A high drop-out rate in the longer treatment arms precluded obtaining definitive conclusions about the efficacy of prolonging therapy. Premature treatment discontinuations due to serious adverse events occurred in 8.2%. Infection with HCV-2/3, lower baseline HCV-RNA, and negative HCV-RNA at week 12 were all independent predictors of SVR in the multivariate analysis. The use of RBV 1000-1200 mg/day plus pegIFN is relatively safe and provides SVR in nearly half of coinfected patients, twice as high in HCV-2/3 than HCV-1/4.

Specific targeted antiviral therapy for hepatitis C

Since the discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) as the major cause of non-A, non-B hepatitis in 1989, the search for specific targeted antiviral therapy for HCV (STAT-C) has been underway. Recently, major advances in the understanding of HCV biology and the development of an in vitro system of HCV replication have contributed to the selection of multiple candidate drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C. In 2006, five such candidate drugs have entered phase II clinical trials in patients chronically infected with hepatitis C, including small molecule inhibitors of the HCV NS3 serine protease and NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This review focuses on hepatitis C protease and polymerase inhibitors that have progressed to phase II clinical development, foreshadowing the era of STAT-Cs.

Critical role of ribavirin for the achievement of early virological response to HCV therapy in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients

The response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy seems to be lower in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients than in HCV-monoinfected individuals. Given that most pivotal trials conducted in coinfected patients have used the combination of pegylated interferon (pegIFN) along with fixed low doses (800 mg/day) of ribavirin (RBV), it is unclear whether HIV itself and/or suboptimal RBV exposure could explain this poorer outcome. Two well-defined end points of early virological response were evaluated in Peginterferon Ribavirina España Coinfección (PRESCO), a multicentre trial in which the combination of pegIFN plus RBV (1000 mg if body weight <75 kg and 1200 mg if >75 kg) was prescribed to coinfected patients. For comparisons, we used unpublished data from early kinetics in two other large trials, one performed in HIV-negative patients [Pegasys International Study Group (PISG)] in which RBV 1000-1200 mg/day was used and another [AIDS Pegasys Ribavirin Coinfection Trial (APRICOT)] in which HIV-positive patients received fixed low RBV doses (800 mg/day). A total of 348 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients from the PRESCO trial were analysed as well as all patients treated with pegIFN plus RBV, who completed 12 weeks of therapy in the comparative studies (435 in PISG and 268 in APRICOT). Negative serum HCV-RNA at week 4 (which has the highest positive predictive value of sustained virological response, SVR) was attained in 33.3%, 31.2% and 13% of treated patients with HCV genotype 1, respectively, in PRESCO, PISG and APRICOT. For HCV genotypes 2/3, responses were 83.7%, 84.2% and 37%, respectively. A decline lower than 2 log(10) at week 12 (which has the highest negative predictive value of SVR) was seen in 25.5%, 19.5% and 37% of HCV genotype-1-infected patients, and in 2.1%, 2.9% and 12% of genotypes-2/3-infected patients, respectively. Prescription of high RBV doses enhances the early virological response to HCV therapy in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients, with results approaching those seen in HCV-monoinfected patients.

Evidence and possible consequences of the phosphorylation of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in human red blood cells

The intracellular metabolism of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) in mononuclear cells has been thoroughly studied, but that in red blood cells (RBC) has been disregarded. However, the phosphorylation of other analogous nucleosides (in particular, ribavirin) has been described previously. In this study, we investigated for the first time the phosphorylation of NRTI in human RBC. The presence of intracellular zidovudine (AZT) monophosphate, AZT triphosphate, lamivudine (3TC) triphosphate, and tenofovir (TFV) diphosphate, as well as endogenous dATP, dGTP, and dTTP, in RBC collected from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients was examined. We observed evidence of a selective phosphorylation of 3TC, TFV, and endogenous purine deoxynucleosides to generate their triphosphate moieties. Conversely, no trace of AZT phosphate metabolites was found, and only faint dTTP signals were visible. A comparison of intracellular TFV diphosphate and 3TC triphosphate levels in RBC and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) further highlighted the specificity of NRTI metabolism in each cell type. These findings raise the issue of RBC involvement in drug-drug interaction, drug pharmacokinetics, and drug-induced toxicity. Moreover, the typical preparation of PBMC samples by gradient density centrifugation does not prevent their contamination with RBC. We demonstrated that the presence of RBC within PBMC hampers an accurate determination of intracellular TFV diphosphate and dATP levels in clinical PBMC samples. Thus, we recommend removing RBC during PBMC preparation by using an ammonium chloride solution to enhance both the accuracy and the precision of intracellular drug monitoring.

Status presens of antiviral drugs and strategies: Part II: RNA VIRUSES (EXCEPT RETROVIRUSES)

More than 40 compounds have been formally licensed for clinical use as antiviral drugs, and half of these are used for the treatment of HIV infections. The others have been approved for the therapy of herpesvirus (HSV, VZV, CMV), hepadnavirus (HBV), hepacivirus (HCV) and myxovirus (influenza, RSV) infections. New compounds are in clinical development or under preclinical evaluation, and, again, half of these are targeting HIV infections. Yet, quite a number of important viral pathogens (i.e. HPV, HCV, hemorrhagic fever viruses) remain in need of effective and/or improved antiviral therapies.

Viruses and Viral Diseases

More than 40 compounds have been formally licensed for clinical use as antiviral drugs, and half of these are used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. The others have been approved for the therapy of herpesvirus (herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV)), hepadnavirus (hepatitis B virus (HBV)), hepacivirus (hepatitis C virus (HCV)), and myxovirus (influenza, respiratory synctural virus (RSV)) infections. New compounds are in clinical development or under preclinical evaluation, and, again, half of these target HIV infections. Yet, quite a number of important viral pathogens (i.e., human papilloma virus (HPV), HCV, hemorrhagic fever viruses) remain in need of effective and/or improved antiviral therapies.

Pharmacokinetics of ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C virus

AIM

A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using plasma concentration data (n = 7025) from 380 patients to examine the relationship between ribavirin dose and its pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Ribavirin pharmacokinetics were described by a three-compartment model with sequential zero-order and a first-order absorption processes. Interoccasion variability and food effects were included.

RESULTS

Lean body weight (range 41-91 kg) was the only covariate with a clinically significant influence on ribavirin pharmacokinetics, affecting clearance (15.3-23.9 l h(-1)) and the volume of the larger peripheral compartment.

CONCLUSION

The model provided a good description of the available data, confirmed by accurate estimates of parameter values and low residual variability (17%).

Antiretroviral therapy in coinfected patients: viral hepatitis and tuberculosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Highly active antiretroviral therapy in coinfected patients is complicated by a potentially increased risk for hepatotoxicity. Therefore, treatment strategies are urgently needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In HIV/hepatitis B virus coinfected patients with an indication for therapy for both HIV and hepatitis B, tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine containing highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens are the favored first-line treatment as they include medications which are dually active. Although highly active antiretroviral therapy has no direct effect on hepatitis C replication, the associated immune restoration appears to slow down the progression of liver fibrosis. In patients with HIV and tuberculosis coinfection without any prior highly active antiretroviral therapy, delay of initiation of antiviral therapy for 4-8 weeks after initiation of tuberculosis treatment allows for a better discrimination of causes of adverse events and paradoxical reactions.

SUMMARY

With the introduction of new medications for treatment of hepatitis B virus, therapeutic options for HIV/hepatitis B virus coinfected patients have improved considerably. Initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy may be a promising option for slowing down further progression of hepatitis C-associated liver disease. Simultaneous treatment of tuberculosis and HIV infection remains a therapeutic challenge requiring specific knowledge of drug-drug interactions as well as management strategies for possible immune reconstitution syndromes.

Chronic hepatitis C in patients with HIV/AIDS: a new challenge in antiviral therapy

HIV-infected patients are living longer since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. However, coinfection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) leads to increased morbidity from liver disease and higher overall mortality. The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C among patients with HIV/AIDS ranges from 7% (sexual transmission of HIV) to >90% (injection drug use). Uncontrolled HIV infection seems to accelerate the progression of HCV-induced liver fibrosis. Forty-eight weeks of combination therapy with pegylated interferon alpha (2a or 2b) plus ribavirin achieves a sustained viral response in coinfected individuals in up to 38% with HCV genotype 1 and up to 73% with genotypes 2 or 3. The safety profile of this treatment is similar to therapy in HCV-monoinfected patients with influenza-like symptoms, cytopenia and neuropsychiatric symptoms dominating. However, HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who also take zidovudine develop more profound anaemia than those on other HIV nucleoside analogue therapy. Didanosine and stavudine are associated with rare but serious mitochondrial toxicity, such as pancreatitis or lactic acidosis. It does not appear that the addition of ribavirin increases that risk. There is currently no evidence that in HIV/HCV coinfection one pegylated interferon product is superior to the other. Contrary to common perception, it is also unproven that HIV/HCV-coinfected patients respond less well to therapy with peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin than HCV-monoinfected patients. Given the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with peginterferon plus ribavirin and the deleterious effects of chronic hepatitis C, all HIV/HCV-coinfected patients should be evaluated for therapy.