Evaluation by monte carlo simulation of the pharmacokinetics of two doses of meropenem administered intermittently or as a continuous infusion in healthy volunteers

Does Two-Step Infusion Improve the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Target Attainment of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients?

The optimal method for administering meropenem remains controversial. This study was conducted to explore the optimal two-step infusion strategy (TIT), and to investigate whether TIT is superior to intermittent infusion therapy (IIT) and prolonged infusion therapy (PIT). A physiologically based pharmacokinetics model for critically ill patients was established and evaluated. The validated model was utilized to evaluate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment of meropenem. The PK/PD target attainment of different TITs varied greatly, and the total infusion duration and the first-step dose greatly affected these values. The optimal TIT was 0.25 g (30 min) + 0.75 g (150 min) at MICs of ≤2 mg/L, and 0.25 g (45 min) + 0.75 g (255 min) at MICs of 4-8 mg/L. The PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT, PIT, and IIT were 100 % at MICs of ≤1 mg/L. When MIC increased to 2-8 mg/L, the PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT was similar to that of PIT and higher than IIT. In conclusion, TIT did not significantly improve the PK/PD target attainment of meropenem compared with PIT. IIT is adequate at MICs of ≤1 mg/L, and PIT may be the optimal meropenem infusion method in critically ill patients with MICs of 2-8 mg/L.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of meropenem in critically ill patients

This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model (PBPK/PD) of meropenem for critically ill patients. A PBPK model of meropenem in healthy adults was established using PK-Sim software and subsequently extrapolated to critically ill patients based on anatomic and physiological parameters. The mean fold error (MFE) and geometric mean fold error (GMFE) methods were used to compare the differences between predicted and observed values of pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-∞, and CL to evaluate the accuracy of the PBPK model. The model was verified using meropenem plasma samples obtained from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, which were determined by HPLC-MS/MS. After that, the PBPK model was combined with a PKPD model, which was developed based on f%T > MIC. Monte Carlo simulation was utilized to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) in patients. The developed PBPK model successfully predicted the meropenem disposition in critically ill patients, wherein the MFE average and GMFE of all predicted PK parameters were within the 1.25-fold error range. The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of meropenem was conducted with 92 blood samples from 31 ICU patients, of which 71 (77.17%) blood samples were consistent with the simulated value. The TDM results showed that meropenem PBPK modeling is well simulated in critically ill patients. Monte Carlo simulations showed that extended infusion and frequent administration were necessary to achieve curative effect for critically ill patients, whereas excessive infusion time (> 4 h) was unnecessary. The PBPK/PD modeling incorporating literature and prospective study data can predict meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients correctly. Our study provides a reference for dose adjustment in critically ill patients.

Extended Infusion of Beta-Lactams and Glycopeptides: A New Era in Pediatric Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Optimizing antibiotic therapy is imperative with rising bacterial resistance and high infection mortality. Extended infusion defined as a continuous infusion (COI) or prolonged infusion (PI) of beta-lactams and glycopeptides might improve efficacy and safety compared to their intermittent administration (IA). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended infusion in pediatric patients. Adhering to Cochrane standards, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of COI (24 h/d) and PI (>1 h/dose) compared to IA (≤1 h/dose) of beta-lactams and glycopeptides in pediatrics. Primary outcomes included mortality, clinical success, and microbiological eradication. Five studies could be included for the outcome mortality, investigating meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, or combinations of these. The pooled relative risk estimate was 0.48 (95% CI 0.26-0.89, p = 0.02). No significant differences between the administration modes were found for the outcomes of clinical success, microbiological eradication (beta-lactams; glycopeptides), and mortality (glycopeptides). No study reported additional safety issues, e.g., adverse drug reactions when using COI/PI vs. IA. Our findings suggest that the administration of beta-lactams by extended infusion leads to a reduction in mortality for pediatric patients.

Concentrations of Co-Administered Meropenem and Vancomycin in Spinal Tissues Relevant for the Treatment of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis-An Experimental Microdialysis Study

Co-administration of meropenem and vancomycin has been suggested as a systemic empirical antibiotic treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The aim of this study was, in an experimental porcine model, to evaluate the percentage of an 8-h dosing interval of co-administered meropenem and vancomycin concentrations above the relevant minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (%T>MIC) in spinal tissues using microdialysis. Eight female pigs (Danish Landrace breed, weight 78-82 kg) received a single-dose bolus infusion of 1000 mg of meropenem and 1000 mg vancomycin simultaneously before microdialysis sampling. Microdialysis catheters were applied in the third cervical (C3) vertebral cancellous bone, the C3-C4 intervertebral disc, paravertebral muscle, and adjacent subcutaneous tissue. Plasma samples were obtained for reference. The main finding was that for both drugs, the %T>MICs were highly reliant on the applied MIC target, but were heterogeneous across all targeted tissues, ranging from 25-90% for meropenem, and 10-100% for vancomycin. For both MIC targets, the highest %T>MIC was demonstrated in plasma, and the lowest %T>MIC was demonstrated in the vertebral cancellous bone for meropenem, and in the intervertebral disc for vancomycin. When indicated, our findings may suggest a more aggressive dosing approach of both meropenem and vancomycin to increase the spinal tissue concentrations to treat the full spectrum of potentially encountered bacteria in a spondylodiscitis treatment setting.

A Systematic Review on Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetic Differences between Asian and Non-Asian Adult Populations

While the relevance of inter-ethnic differences to the pharmacokinetic variabilities of antimicrobials has been reported in studies recruiting healthy subjects, differences in antimicrobial pharmacokinetics between Asian and non-Asian patients with severe pathologic conditions require further investigation. For the purpose of describing the potential differences in antimicrobial pharmacokinetics between Asian and non-Asian populations, a systematic review was performed using six journal databases and six theses/dissertation databases (PROSPERO record CRD42018090054). The pharmacokinetic data of healthy volunteers and non-critically ill and critically ill patients were reviewed. Thirty studies on meropenem, imipenem, doripenem, linezolid, and vancomycin were included in the final descriptive summaries. In studies recruiting hospitalised patients, inconsistent differences in the volume of distribution (V_d) and drug clearance (CL) of the studied antimicrobials between Asian and non-Asian patients were observed. Additionally, factors other than ethnicity, such as demographic (e.g., age) or clinical (e.g., sepsis) factors, were suggested to better characterise these pharmacokinetic differences. Inconsistent differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between Asian and non-Asian subjects/patients may suggest that ethnicity is not an important predictor to characterise interindividual pharmacokinetic differences between meropenem, imipenem, doripenem, linezolid, and vancomycin. Therefore, the dosing regimens of these antimicrobials should be adjusted according to patients' demographic or clinical characteristics that can better describe pharmacokinetic differences.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin/Tazobactam Across the Adult Lifespan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Piperacillin/tazobactam is one of the most frequently used antimicrobials in older adults. Using an opportunistic study design, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin/tazobactam as a probe drug to evaluate changes in antibacterial drug exposure and dosing requirements, including in older adults.

METHODS

A total of 121 adult patients were included. The population pharmacokinetic models that best characterized the observed plasma concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam were one-compartment structural models with zero-order input and linear elimination.

RESULTS

Among all potential covariates, estimated creatinine clearance had the most substantial impact on the elimination clearance for both piperacillin and tazobactam. After accounting for renal function and body size, there was no remaining impact of frailty on the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that renal function had a greater impact on the therapeutic target attainment than age, although these covariates were highly correlated. Frailty, using the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale, was assessed in 60 patients who were ≥ 65 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The simulations suggested that adults ≤ 50 years of age infected with organisms with higher minimum inhibitory concentrations may benefit from continuous piperacillin/tazobactam infusions (12 g/day of piperacillin component) or extended infusions of 4 g every 8 hours. However, for a target of 50% fT + minimum inhibitory concentration, dosing based on renal function is generally preferable to dosing by age, and simulations suggested that patients with creatinine clearance ≥ 120 mL/min may benefit from infusions of 4 g every 8 hours for organisms with higher minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem in Neurocritical Care Patients: a Prospective Two-Center Study

Morbidity and mortality related to ventriculitis in neurocritical care patients remain high. Antibiotic dose optimization may improve therapeutic outcomes. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in infected critically ill patients was developed. We applied the final model to determine optimal meropenem dosing regimens required to achieve targeted cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Neurocritical care patients receiving meropenem and with a diagnosis of ventriculitis or extracranial infection were recruited from two centers to this study. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and assayed. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. We sought to determine optimized dosing regimens that achieved meropenem cerebrospinal fluid concentrations above pathogen MICs for 40% of the dosing interval, or a higher target ratio of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid trough concentrations to pathogen MIC of ≥1. In total, 53 plasma and 34 cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from eight patients. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were appropriately described using a three-compartment model with linear plasma clearance scaled for creatinine clearance and cerebrospinal fluid penetration scaled for patient age. Considerable interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was apparent, particularly in the cerebrospinal fluid. Percent coefficients of variation for meropenem clearance from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were 41.7% and 89.6%, respectively; for meropenem, the volume of distribution in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid values were 63.4% and 58.3%, respectively. High doses (up to 8 to 10 g/day) improved attainment of meropenem cerebrospinal fluid target exposures, particularly for less susceptible organisms (MICs, ≥0.25 mg/L). Standard meropenem doses of 2 g every 8 h may not achieve effective concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid in all critically ill patients. Higher doses, or alternative dosing methods (e.g., loading dose followed by continuous infusion) may be required to optimize cerebrospinal fluid exposures. Doses of up to 8 to 10 g/day either as intermittent boluses or continuous infusion would be suitable for patients with augmented renal clearance; lower doses may be considered for patients with impaired renal function as empirical suggestions. Ongoing dosing should be tailored to the individual patient circumstances. Notably, the study population was small and dosing recommendations may not be generalizable to all critically ill patients.

Methods for Determination of Meropenem Concentration in Biological Samples

Measuring the concentration of antibiotics in biological samples allow implementation of therapeutic monitoring of these drugs and contribute to the adjustment of the dosing regimen in patients. This increases the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy, reduces the toxicity of these drugs and prevents the development of bacterial resistance. This review article summarizes current knowledge on methods for determining concentration of meropenem, an antibiotic drug from the group of carbapenems, in different biological samples. It provides a brief discussion of the chemical structure, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of meropenem, different sample preparation techniques, use of apparatus and equipment, knowledge of the advantages and limitations of available methods, as well as directions in which new methods should be developed. This review should facilitate clinical laboratories to select and apply one of the established methods for measuring of meropenem, as well as to provide them with the necessary knowledge to develop new methods for quantification of meropenem in biological samples according to their needs.

[Pharmacokinetic modifications and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimization of beta-lactams in ICU]

Pharmacokinetic modifications in critically ill patients and those induced by ICU therapeutics raise a lot of issues about antibiotic dose adaptation. Beta-lactams are anti-infectious widely used in ICU. Frequent beta-lactam underdoses induce a risk of therapeutic failure potentially lethal and of emergence of bacterial resistance. Overdoses expose to a neurotoxic and nephrotoxic risk. Therefore, an understanding of pharmacokinetics modifications appears to be essential. A global pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach is required, including use of prolonged or continued beta-lactam infusions to optimise probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring should also be considered. Experts agree to target a free plasma betalactam concentration above four times the MIC of the causative bacteria for 100 % of the dosing interval. Bayesian methods could permit individualized doses adaptations.

Carbapenem-sparing strategy: carbapenemase, treatment, and stewardship

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

describing the current role of carbapenems and carbapenem-sparing strategies in the setting of antimicrobial stewardship programs.

RECENT FINDINGS

sparing carbapenems with other drugs appears to be an interesting perspective for a variety of reasons in the current context of the multidrug-resistant (MDR) pandemic. Specific algorithms should also be precisely investigated to define better how to spare carbapenems within empiric and targeted regimens, with combination treatment or monotherapies, aiming at the best use of the new drugs and improving de-escalation as soon as possible for most of the patients.

SUMMARY

stewardship programs may be useful in reducing probable misuse and overuse of antibiotics, which has probably contributed to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria worldwide. The proposal of carbapenem-sparing strategies has then generated substantial scientific debate and, overall, the concept of sparing these drugs is well advocated together with judicious use of novel drugs, appropriate measures of infection control and prevention as well as in stewardship programs to curb the spread of MDR and XDR-strains in healthcare facilities.

Update on the role of ceftazidime-avibactam in the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel combination of a known cephalosporin and a non-β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia as well as Gram-negative infections with limited treatment options in Europe. Since its approval, it has been used in patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria, in many occasions as off-label indication or salvage therapy, with promising clinical and microbiological cure rates. Emergence of resistance during therapy to this new combination has already been described, which is a matter of concern. A rational use of these new therapeutic options is critical in the multidrug resistance era. The current review focuses on the clinical experience in real life of ceftazidime-avibactam use in the treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.

Comparable Effect of Two-Step Versus Extended Infusions on the Pharmacokinetics of Imipenem in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters of imipenem administered by two-step (50% delivered in a 30-min bolus, 50% for the following 90 min) or extended (administered continuously for 2 h) infusion.

METHODS

Patients with sepsis and septic shock were prospectively enrolled and randomized into four groups. Subjects in the two-step or extended groups were given two doses of imipenem (0.5 g q6h and 1.0 g q8h). The plasma imipenem concentrations were measured at given time points after the fifth dose. The PK/PD target was defined as the achievement of a fractional time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of > 40%.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were eventually enrolled. No significant difference was observed in the percentage of patients achieving 40% T > MIC between the different infusion modes with the same dosage, although the two-step groups exhibited a significantly shorter T_max compared with the extended groups (0.5 g q6h: 1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.0 ± 0.0 h; 1.0 g q8h: 1.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.0 ± 0.0 h; both, p < 0.05). All four groups achieved 40% T > MIC when MIC was 0.5-4.0 μg/ml, but only regimens with a higher dose (1.0 g q8h) achieved target when MIC was 8 μg/ml.

CONCLUSION

The two-step and extended regimens of imipenem are comparable to the PK/PD target in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. A higher dose (1.0 g q8h) should be considered for target achievement at an MIC of > 8 μg/ml.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02616354.

Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections: Sepsis

This is the eleventh chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. Sepsis, defined as a life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a misregulated host response to an infection, is the third leading cause of death in Germany with a lethality rate of 30% to over 50%. An early, effective antimicrobial therapy is, next to infectious source control, the most important causal treatment option. It should be complemented by the mainly supportive measures of general intensive care therapy. Prior antimicrobial therapy, the patient's medical history (e.g. risk factors for multiresistant agents) and small-scale epidemiology are to be considered as part of the therapeutic and practical decisions. A modification of the often needed broad initial calculated combination therapy is desirable. In the future, prompt measurements of plasma concentrations of antiinfectives, especially for the sepsis patient with diverse and partly conflicting pathophysiological changes, will have great importance regarding efficacy, toxicity and resistance development. In order to apply those complex strategies in clinical routine, there is a requirement for a strong interdisciplinary collaboration between the intensive care unit, clinical infectiology, microbiology, and clinical pharmacology, ideally in the framework of a functional antimicrobial stewardship program.

Model-Informed Drug Development, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Cutoff Value Determination, and Antibacterial Efficacy of Benapenem against Enterobacteriaceae

Benapenem is a novel carbapenem. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) cutoff values and evaluate the optimal administration regimens of benapenem for the treatment of bacterial infections via PK/PD modeling and simulation. Ertapenem was used as a control. Infected mice received an intravenous (i.v.) injection of benapenem or ertapenem of 14.6, 58.4, or 233.6 mg/kg of body weight, and the PK/PD profiles were evaluated.

Benapenem is a novel carbapenem. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) cutoff values and evaluate the optimal administration regimens of benapenem for the treatment of bacterial infections via PK/PD modeling and simulation. Ertapenem was used as a control. Infected mice received an intravenous (i.v.) injection of benapenem or ertapenem of 14.6, 58.4, or 233.6 mg/kg of body weight, and the PK/PD profiles were evaluated. The MICs were determined by using a 2-fold agar dilution method. Mathematical models were developed to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of benapenem in humans and mice. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the cutoff values and the appropriate benapenem dosing regimens for the treatment of infections caused by clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Two 2-compartment models were developed to describe the PK profiles of benapenem in humans and mice. A two-site binding model was applied to fit the protein binding in mouse plasma. Through correlation analysis, the percentage of the time that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (%fT_>MIC) was determined to be the indicator of efficacy. Results from the simulation showed that the probability of target attainment (PTA) against the tested isolates was over 90% with the dosing regimens studied. The PK/PD cutoff value of benapenem was 1 mg/liter at a %fT_>MIC of 60% when given at a dose of 1,000 mg/day by i.v. drip for 0.5 h. The established model provides a better understanding of the pharmacological properties of benapenem for the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae infections. The proposed PK/PD cutoff value suggests that benapenem is a promising antibacterial against the Enterobacteriaceae. The cutoff value of 1 mg/liter may be a useful guide for the clinical use of benapenem and for surveillance for benapenem resistance.

Towards a Generic Tool for Prediction of Meropenem Systemic and Infection-Site Exposure: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Adult Patients with Pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for meropenem using a retrograde approach, which could serve as a basis for prediction of the systemic and infection-site drug exposures in different populations and indications. We intended this model to be a useful tool to inform (local) pharmacokinetic-based optimal dosing of meropenem in different settings.

METHODS

We developed a reduced physiologically based pharmacokinetic model with NONMEM software using a top-down approach. We used historical (previously published) data for model development and qualification. We used steady-state systemic and infection-site concentrations from 60 adult patients diagnosed with severe lung infection for model development and internal evaluation. The data included rich plasma and sparse epithelial lining fluid samples. We based the internal validation of the model on successful numerical convergence, adequate precision in parameter estimation, acceptable goodness-of-fit plot with no indication of bias, and acceptable performance of visual predictive checks. We performed external validation by fitting the model to independent data from five previously published studies: four studies in patients with pneumonia, with different grades of renal impairment, and one study in morbidly obese patients.

RESULTS

We successfully fitted a reduced physiologically based pharmacokinetic model with six compartments (arterial and venous pools, infection site [lungs], liver, kidneys and rest of the body) to the data and adequately estimated model parameters. We successfully qualified the model (internally and externally) using established methods. Estimated values for tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients were 0.2629 and 0.1946 for lungs and non-fat tissues (kidneys and liver), respectively. Estimated total clearance was 8.174 L/h for a typical patient with a glomerular filtration rate of 65 mL/min. Consistent with the known mechanism of meropenem elimination and previously published models, renal clearance accounted for 70% of total clearance. The model had good predictive performances on data from five different sources including populations with different characteristics with regard to body size, renal function and morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for meropenem in adult patients to be used as a basis for prediction of concentrations in different groups of patients, and eventually for effective dose individualisation in different subgroups of the population.

Optimization of the treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients-guidelines from the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Société Française de Pharmacologie et Thérapeutique-SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation-SFAR)

BACKGROUND

Beta-lactam antibiotics (βLA) are the most commonly used antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU). ICU patients present many pathophysiological features that cause pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) specificities, leading to the risk of underdosage. The French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) have joined forces to provide guidelines on the optimization of beta-lactam treatment in ICU patients.

METHODS

A consensus committee of 18 experts from the two societies had the mission of producing these guidelines. The entire process was conducted independently of any industry funding. A list of questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) was drawn-up by the experts. Then, two bibliographic experts analysed the literature published since January 2000 using predefined keywords according to PRISMA recommendations. The quality of the data identified from the literature was assessed using the GRADE® methodology. Due to the lack of powerful studies having used mortality as main judgement criteria, it was decided, before drafting the recommendations, to formulate only "optional" recommendations.

RESULTS

After two rounds of rating and one amendment, a strong agreement was reached by the SFPT-SFAR guideline panel for 21 optional recommendations and a recapitulative algorithm for care covering four areas: (i) pharmacokinetic variability, (ii) PK-PD relationship, (iii) administration modalities, and (iv) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The most important recommendations regarding βLA administration in ICU patients concerned (i) the consideration of the many sources of PK variability in this population; (ii) the definition of free plasma concentration between four and eight times the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the causative bacteria for 100% of the dosing interval as PK-PD target to maximize bacteriological and clinical responses; (iii) the use of continuous or prolonged administration of βLA in the most severe patients, in case of high MIC bacteria and in case of lower respiratory tract infection to improve clinical cure; and (iv) the use of TDM to improve PK-PD target achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts strongly suggest the use of personalized dosing, continuous or prolonged infusion and therapeutic drug monitoring when administering βLA in critically ill patients.

Evaluation of Meropenem Extended Versus Intermittent Infusion Dosing Protocol in Critically Ill Patients

Extended infusion (EI) administration of β-lactams can improve target attainment in critically ill patients with altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. To optimize meropenem dosing in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, our Antimicrobial Stewardship Program implemented a EI meropenem (EIM) protocol in an 18-bed Medical Intensive Care Unit in March 2014. In this retrospective study, we compared intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and clinical response in patients who received meropenem for ≥72 hours administered per EIM protocol of 1 g over 3 hours every 8 hours versus intermittent infusion (IIM) protocol of 500 mg over 30 minutes every 6 hours. Age, weight, comorbidities, severity of illness, and vasopressor use were comparable between groups (EIM protocol n = 52, IIM protocol n = 96). The IIM protocol group had higher rates of renal dose adjustment at meropenem initiation. Among 56 identified gram-negative (GN) pathogens, 94% had meropenem minimal inhibitory concentration ≤0.25 mg/L. The ICU mortality was lower (19 vs 37%; P = .032) and clinical response was higher (83% vs 46%; P < .01) in the EIM protocol versus IIM protocol group. Total vasopressor days were shorter (2 vs 3 days; P = .038), and white blood cell normalization rate was higher (87% vs 51%; P < .01) in the EIM protocol versus IIM protocol group. There was no difference in days of mechanical ventilation, duration of therapy, and ICU stay. The IIM protocol was also identified as an independent risk factor associated with ICU mortality (hazard ratio: 3.653, 95% confidence interval: 1.689-7.981; P = .001) after adjusting for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. In this cohort of patients with severe sepsis/septic shock and highly susceptible GN pathogens, there was improved mortality and clinical response in the EIM protocol group.

Application of Antibiotic Pharmacodynamics and Dosing Principles in Patients With Sepsis

Sepsis is associated with marked mortality, which may be reduced by prompt initiation of adequate, appropriate doses of antibiotic. Critically ill patients often have physiological changes that reduce blood and tissue concentrations of antibiotic and high rates of multidrug-resistant pathogens, which may affect patients' outcomes. All critical care professionals, including critical care nurses, should understand antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to ensure sound antibiotic dosing and administration strategies for optimal microbial killing and patients' outcomes. Effective pathogen eradication occurs when the dose of antibiotic reaches or maintains optimal concentrations relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration for the pathogen. Time-dependent antibiotics, such as β-lactams, can be given as extended or continuous infusions. Concentration-dependent antibiotics such as aminoglycosides are optimized by using high, once-daily dosing strategies with serum concentration monitoring. Vancomycin and fluoroquinolones are dependent on both time and concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in elderly patients: dosing simulations based on renal function

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate different dosage regimens of meropenem in elderly patients in relation with renal function using a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model.

METHODS

The data of 178 elderly patients treated with meropenem was collected from different sources. A popPK model was developed by using NONMEM® and the influence of different covariates on meropenem CL and V₁ was observed. Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed at steady state to observe the % T > MIC for targets of 40, 60 and 80% of dosage intervals at different levels of creatinine clearance (CL_CR).

RESULTS

The data was described by a two-compartment model and the values of parameter estimates for CL, V₁, Q and V₂ were 5.27 L/h, 17.2 L, 9.92 L/h and 10.6 L, respectively. The CL_CR, body weight and centre had a significant influence on meropenem CL while no direct influence of age was observed. Extended infusions had pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) breakpoint one dilution greater than corresponding short infusion regimens for each target of % T > MIC.

CONCLUSION

Meropenem CL was significantly lower in the elderly compared to CL reported in younger patients due to the reduced renal function. An extended infusion of 1000 mg q8h can be considered for empirical treatment of infections in elderly patients when CL_CR is ≤ 50 mL/min. A continuous infusion of 3000 mg daily dose is preferred if CL_CR > 50 mL/min. However, a higher daily dose of meropenem would be required for resistant strains (MIC >8 mg/L) of bacteria if CL_CR is >100 mL/min.

Meropenem by Continuous Versus Intermittent Infusion in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia due to Gram-Negative Bacilli

Background:

It is known that β-lactam antibiotics exhibit time-dependent bactericidal activity. Several studies have found continuous infusion of meropenem more effective than intermittent infusion in maintaining constant serum concentrations in excess of the minimum inhibitory concentration. However, limited data exist on the clinical efficacy of meropenem administered by continuous infusion.

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of continuous versus intermittent infusion of meropenem for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to gram-negative bacilli.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with VAP caused by gram-negative bacilli who received initial empiric antibiotic therapy with meropenem. We analyzed 2 contemporary cohorts: one group received meropenem by continuous infusion (1 g over 360 min every 6 h), the other by intermittent infusion (1 g over 30 min every 6 h). The administration method was prescribed according to the physician's discretion. Patients received meropenem plus tobramycin for 14 days.

Results:

There were no significant differences between patient groups with regard to gender, age, APACHE-II at intensive care unit admission, diagnosis, microorganism responsible for VAP, or organ dysfunction severity at the time VAP was suspected. The group receiving medication by continuous infusion showed a greater clinical cure rate than the group treated with intermittent infusion (38 of 42, 90.47%, vs 28 of 47, 59.57%, respectively, with OR 6.44 [95% Cl 1.97 to 21.05; p < 0.001]).

Conclusions:

Meropenem administered by continuous infusion may have more clinical efficacy than intermittent infusion.

[Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics in intensive care]

Optimized dosage regimens of antibiotics have remained obscure since their introduction. During the last two decades pharmacokinetic(PK)-pharmacodynamic(PD) relationships, originally established in animal experiments, have been increasingly used in patients. The action of betalactams is believed to be governed by the time the plasma concentration is above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Aminoglycosides act as planned when the peak concentration is a multiple of the MIC and vancomycin seems to work best when the area under the plasma vs. time curve (AUC) to MIC has a certain ratio. Clinicians should be aware that these relationships can only be an indication in which direction dosing should go. Larger studies with sufficiently high numbers of patients and particularly severely sick patients are needed to prove the concepts. In times where all antibiotics can be measured with new technologies, the introduction of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is suggested for ICUs (Intensive Care Unit). The idea of a central lab for TDM of antibiotics such as PEAK (Paul Ehrlich Antibiotika Konzentrationsmessung) is supported.

Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of meropenem in neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Ventriculitis is a complication of temporary intraventricular drains. The limited penetration of meropenem into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is well known. However, ventricular CSF pharmacokinetic data in patients with ventriculitis are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate meropenem pharmacokinetics in the serum and CSF of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis.

METHODS

We conducted an observational pharmacokinetic study of neurocritical care patients with proven or suspected ventriculitis receiving meropenem. Multiple blood and CSF samples were taken and were described using nonparametric pharmacokinetic modelling with Pmetrics.

RESULTS

In total, 21 patients (median age 52 years, median weight 76 kg) were included. The median (range) of peak and trough concentrations in serum were 20.16 (4.40-69.00) mg/L and 2.54 (0.00-31.40) mg/L, respectively. The corresponding peak and trough concentrations in CSF were 1.20 (0.00-6.20) mg/L and 1.28 (0.00-4.10) mg/L, respectively, with a median CSF/serum ratio (range) of 0.09 (0.03-0.16). Median creatinine clearance ranged from 60.7 to 217.6 ml/minute (median 122.5 ml/minute). A three-compartment linear population pharmacokinetic model was most appropriate. No covariate relationships could be supported for any of the model parameters. Meropenem demonstrated poor penetration into CSF, with a median CSF/serum ratio of 9 % and high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of higher-than-standard doses of meropenem and therapeutic drug monitoring in both serum and CSF should be considered to individualise meropenem dosing in neurocritical care patients with ventriculitis.

Treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: can we apply "precision medicine" to antimicrobial chemotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

For the past three decades, carbapenems played a central role in our antibiotic armamentarium, trusted to effectively treat infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. The utility of this class of antibiotics has been compromised by the emergence of resistance especially among Enterobacteriaceae.

AREAS COVERED

We review the current mainstays of pharmacotherapy against infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) including tigecycline, aminoglycosides, and rediscovered 'old' antibiotics such as fosfomycin and polymyxins, and discuss their efficacy and potential toxicity. We also summarize the contemporary clinical experience treating CRE infections with antibiotic combination therapy. Finally, we discuss ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam, containing a new generation of beta-lactamase inhibitors, which may offer alternatives to treat CRE infections. We critically evaluate the published literature, identify relevant clinical trials and review documents submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration.

EXPERT OPINION

Defining the molecular mechanisms of resistance and applying insights about pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of antibiotics, in order to maximize the impact of old and new therapeutic approaches should be the new paradigm in treating infections caused by CRE. A concerted effort is needed to carry out high-quality clinical trials that: i) establish the superiority of combination therapy vs. monotherapy; ii) confirm the role of novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations as therapy against KPC- and OXA-48 producing Enterobacteriaceae; and, iii) evaluate new antibiotics active against CRE as they are introduced into the clinic.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem during continuous infusion in surgical ICU patients

Continuous infusion of meropenem is a candidate strategy for optimization of its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile. However, plasma concentrations are difficult to predict in critically ill patients. Steady-state concentrations of meropenem were determined prospectively during continuous infusion in 32 surgical ICU patients (aged 21-85 years, body weight 55-125 kg, APACHE II 5-29, measured creatinine clearance 22.7-297 mL/min). Urine was collected for the quantification of renal clearance of meropenem and creatinine. Cystatin C was measured as an additional marker of renal function. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using NONMEM(®) , which described total meropenem clearance and its relationship with several estimates of renal function (measured creatinine clearance CLCR , Cockcroft-Gault formula CLCG , Hoek formula, 1/plasma creatinine, 1/plasma cystatin C) and other patient characteristics. Any estimate of renal function improved the model performance. The strongest association of clearance was found with CLCR (typical clearance = 11.3 L/h × [1 + 0.00932 × (CLCR  - 80 mL/min)]), followed by 1/plasma cystatin C; CLCG was the least predictive covariate. Neither age, weight, nor sex was found to be significant. These models can be used to predict dosing requirements or meropenem concentrations during continuous infusion. The covariate CLCR offers the best predictive performance; if not available, cystatin C may provide a promising alternative to plasma creatinine.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Meropenem in Plasma and Tissue of Morbidly Obese Patients after Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Surgery

Meropenem serves as a clinically important, broad-spectrum antibiotic. While meropenem is commonly used in obese patients, its pharmacokinetics in this patient group is not well known. Our aim was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics and target attainment in plasma, subcutaneous tissue, and peritoneal fluid for meropenem in morbidly obese patients. Four doses of 1g meropenem were given as 15-min infusions every 8 h to five morbidly obese patients (body mass index [BMI], 47.6 to 62.3 kg/m(2)). After the fourth dose, serial meropenem concentrations were determined in plasma and, via microdialysis, in subcutaneous tissue and peritoneal fluid. All concentrations were analyzed simultaneously via population modeling, and target attainment probabilities predicted via Monte Carlo simulations using the target of unbound meropenem concentrations above the MIC for at least 40% of the dosing interval. For patients with 53 kg fat-free mass, total clearance was 18.7 liters/h and volume of distribution at steady state was 27.6 liters. The concentrations in subcutaneous tissue and peritoneal fluid largely paralleled those in plasma (equilibration half-life, <30 min). The area under the curve (AUC) in subcutaneous tissue divided by the plasma AUC had a mean of 0.721. For peritoneal fluid, this AUC ratio had a mean of 0.943. Target attainment probabilities were >90% after 1 g meropenem every 8 h as a 15-min infusion for MICs of up to 2 mg/liter in plasma and peritoneal fluid and 0.5 mg/liter in subcutaneous tissue. Meropenem pharmacokinetics in plasma and peritoneal fluid of obese patients was predictable, but subcutaneous tissue penetration varied greatly. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01407965.).

Clinical outcomes of Enterobacteriaceae infections stratified by carbapenem MICs

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) lowered the MIC breakpoints for meropenem and imipenem from 4 mg/liter to 1 mg/liter for Enterobacteriaceae in 2010. The breakpoint change improves the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and eliminates the need for microbiology labs to perform confirmatory testing for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production or other beta-lactamases that hydrolyze carbapenems. However, there are limited data evaluating clinical outcomes of the affected breakpoints, and it is unknown if patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae with reduced susceptibility are more likely to have poor outcomes when treated with a carbapenem. We conducted a single-center retrospective matched-cohort analysis in adult patients with Enterobacteriaceae infections treated with meropenem, imipenem, or doripenem. Patients with Enterobacteriaceae infection with a carbapenem MIC of 2 to 8 mg/liter were matched based on pathogen, source of infection, comorbidities, and disease severity (1:1 ratio) to those with a carbapenem MIC of ≤1 mg/liter. A total of 36 patients were included in the study. The group with carbapenem MICs of 2 to 8 mg/liter had a significantly higher 30-day mortality than the group with carbapenem MICs of ≤1 mg/liter (38.9% compared to 5.6%, P = 0.04). Total hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS were longer in the group with MICs of 2 to 8 mg/liter than in the group with MICs of ≤1 mg/liter (57.6 days compared to 34.4 days [P = 0.06] and 56.6 days compared to 21.7 days [P < 0.01], respectively). Patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae with a carbapenem MIC of 2, 4, or 8 mg/liter had higher mortality rates and longer ICU LOS than matched cohorts with carbapenem MICs of ≤1 mg/liter, which supports CLSI's recommendation to lower susceptibility breakpoints for carbapenems.

Dosing regimen of meropenem for adults with severe burns: a population pharmacokinetic study with Monte Carlo simulations

OBJECTIVES

To develop a population model to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous meropenem in adult patients with severe burns and investigate potential relationships between dosage regimens and antimicrobial efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A dose of 1 g every 8 h was administered to adult patients with total body surface area burns of ≥15%. Doses for subsequent courses were determined using results from the initial course and the patient's clinical condition. Five plasma meropenem concentrations were typically measured over the dosage interval on one to four occasions. An open, two-compartment PK model was fitted to the meropenem concentrations using NONMEM and the effect of covariates on meropenem PK was investigated. Monte Carlo simulations investigated dosage regimens to achieve a target T>MIC for ≥40%, ≥60% or ≥80% of the dose interval.

RESULTS

Data comprised 113 meropenem concentration measurements from 20 dosage intervals in 12 patients. The parameters were CL (L/h) = 0.196 L/h/kg × [1 - 0.023 × (age - 46)] × [1 - 0.049 × (albumin - 15)], V1 = 0.273 L/kg × [1 - 0.049 × (albumin - 15)], Q = 0.199 L/h/kg and V2 = 0.309 L/kg × [1 - 0.049 × (albumin - 15)]. For a target of ≥80% T>MIC, the breakpoint was 8 mg/L for doses of 1 g every 4 h and 2 g every 8 h given over 3 h, but only 4 mg/L if given over 5 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 1 g 8 hourly should be effective against Escherichia coli and CoNS, higher doses, ideally with a longer infusion time, would be more appropriate for empirical therapy, mixed infections and bacteria with MIC values ≥4 mg/L.

Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections due to Gram-negative bacteria according to carbapenem MIC stratification

Predictive modeling suggests that actual carbapenem MIC results are more predictive of clinical patient outcomes than categorical classification of the MIC as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant. Some have speculated that current CLSI guidelines' suggested thresholds are too high and that clinical success is more likely if the MIC value is ≤1 mg/liter for certain organisms. Patients treated with carbapenems and with positive blood cultures for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria were considered for evaluation in this clinical retrospective cohort study. Relevant patient demographics and microbiologic variables were collected, including carbapenem MIC. The primary objective was to define a risk-adjusted all-cause hospital mortality breakpoint for carbapenem MICs. Secondarily, we sought to determine if a similar breakpoint existed for indirect outcomes (e.g., time to mortality and length of stay [LOS] postinfection for survivors). Seventy-one patients met the criteria for study inclusion. Overall, 52 patients survived, and 19 died. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis determined a split of organism MIC between 2 and 4 mg/liter and predicted differences in mortality (16.1% versus 76.9%; P < 0.01). Logistic regression controlling for confounders identified each imipenem MIC doubling dilution as increasing the probability of death 2-fold (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.2). Secondary outcomes were similar between groups. This study revealed that patients with organisms that had a MIC of ≥4 mg/liter had worse outcomes than patients whose isolates had a MIC of ≤2 mg/liter, even after adjustment for confounding variables. We recommend additional clinical studies to better understand the susceptibility breakpoint for carbapenems.

Antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

A common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) is sepsis, which makes appropriate dosing of antibiotics in these patients essential. Drug dosing in critically ill patients with AKI, however, can be complicated. Critical illness and AKI can both substantially alter pharmacokinetic parameters as compared with healthy individuals or patients with end-stage renal disease. Furthermore, drug pharmacokinetic parameters are highly variable within the critically ill population. The volume of distribution of hydrophilic agents can increase as a result of fluid overload and decreased binding of the drug to serum proteins, and antibiotic loading doses must be adjusted upwards to account for these changes. Although renal elimination of drugs is decreased in patients with AKI, residual renal function in conjunction with renal replacement therapies (RRTs) result in enhanced drug clearance, and maintenance doses must reflect this situation. Antibiotic dosing decisions should be individualized to take into account patient-related, RRT-related, and drug-related factors. Efforts must also be made to optimize the attainment of antibiotic pharmacodynamic goals in this population.

Optimization of meropenem dosage in the critically ill population based on renal function

PURPOSE

To develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model in critically ill patients with particular focus on optimizing dosing regimens based on renal function.

METHODS

Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with creatinine clearance (CrCl) and adjusted body weight to predict parameter estimates. Initial modeling was performed on 21 patients (55 samples). Validation was conducted with 12 samples from 5 randomly selected patients excluded from the original model. A 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was used to ascertain optimal dosing regimens for three CrCl ranges.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD age, APACHE, and CrCl were 59.2 ± 16.8 years, 13.6 ± 7, and 78.3 ± 33.7 mL/min. Meropenem doses ranged from 0.5 g every 8 h (q8h)-2 g q8h as 0.5-3 h infusions. Median estimates for volume of the central compartment, K₁₂ and K₂₁ were 0.24 L/kg, 0.49 h⁻¹, and 0.65 h⁻¹, respectively. K₁₀ was described by the equation: K₁₀= 0.3922 + 0.0025 × CrCl. Model bias and precision were -1.9 and 8.1 mg/L. R², bias, and precision for the validation were 93%, 1.1, and 2.6 mg/L. At minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) up to 8 mg/L, the probability of achieving 40% fT > MIC was 96, 90, and 61% for 3 h infusions of 2 g q8h, 1 g q8h, and 1 g q12h in patients with CrCl ≥50, 30-49, and 10-29, respectively. Target attainment was 75, 65, and 44% for these same dosing regimens as 0.5 h infusions.

CONCLUSIONS

This pharmacokinetic model is capable of accurately estimating meropenem concentrations in critically ill patients over a range of CrCl values. Compared with 0.5 h infusions, regimens employing prolonged infusions improved target attainment across all CrCl ranges.

Comparing outcomes of meropenem administration strategies based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles: a qualitative systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence comparing traditional and alternative dosing strategies for meropenem, based on clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1950-September 2009), EMBASE (1980-September 2009), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-September 2009) were searched, using the terms meropenem, carbapenems, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Reference citations from publications identified were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles discussing administration of meropenem to adults with normal renal function and comparing at least 2 regimens, 1 of which included the manufacturer-recommended regimen of 0.5 g or 1 g every 8 hours infused over 30 minutes, with clinical, pharmacodynamic, or pharmacoeconomic endpoints, were included. The pharmacodynamic endpoint of interest was percent time that the unbound drug concentration exceeded the minimal inhibitory concentration for a bacterial pathogen.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixteen studies were reviewed, which included 13 pharmacokinetic and dynamic assessments using Monte Carlo simulations, 5 clinical evaluations, and 3 pharmacoeconomic appraisals. Data on clinical and economic outcomes are largely nonrandomized retrospective analyses and case reports. Meropenem via intermittent prolonged infusion potentially increases the likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets. However, a strong link with improved clinical outcomes is lacking. Smaller doses with shorter intervals appear to provide pharmacodynamic target attainment rates and clinical outcomes similar to those with traditional dosing, with potential pharmacoeconomic benefits. Meropenem via continuous infusion appears to increase the likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets, compared with intermittent infusions. The sparsity of clinical evidence supporting this practice limits its broad application to practice. No studies have formally examined adverse effects with alternative dosing regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem alternative dosing strategies provide similar pharmacodynamic target attainment rates compared with traditional dosing strategies. Small doses with shorter interval dosing provide additional pharmacoeconomic benefits and similar clinical outcomes. Alternative dosing strategies for meropenem were largely studied in healthy subjects; individuals with pharmacokinetic parameters that differ significantly may be ideal subjects for empiric dose modification.

Cure of persistent, post-appendectomy Klebsiella pneumoniae septicaemia with continuous intravenous administration of meropenem

A 15-year-old girl developed a persistent bacteraemia with Klebsiella pneumoniae accompanied by systemic symptoms including high fever and rigors after appendectomy. Extensive laboratory and imaging work-up, including tests for an intra-vascular source of infection, did not reveal the origin of the persistent bacteraemia. The Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to gentamicin and colistin and intermediately susceptible to meropenem. The septicaemia persisted despite the intravenous administration of meropenem 1 g and later 2 g every 8 h in combination with intravenous gentamicin and later colistin. The patient was cured only after the continuous intravenous administration of meropenem of 6 g/d.

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction: intermittent bolus versus continuous administration? Monte Carlo dosing simulations and subcutaneous tissue distribution

OBJECTIVES

To compare the plasma and subcutaneous tissue concentration-time profiles of meropenem administered by intermittent bolus dosing or continuous infusion to critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction, and to use population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations to assess the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against Gram-negative pathogens likely to be encountered in critical care units.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomized 10 patients with sepsis to receive meropenem by intermittent bolus administration (n = 5; 1 g 8 hourly) or an equal dose administered by continuous infusion (n = 5). Serial subcutaneous tissue concentrations were determined using microdialysis and compared with plasma data for first-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics. Population pharmacokinetic modelling of plasma data and Monte Carlo simulations were then undertaken with NONMEM.

RESULTS

It was found that continuous infusion maintains higher median trough concentrations, in both plasma (intermittent bolus 0 versus infusion 7 mg/L) and subcutaneous tissue (0 versus 4 mg/L). All simulated intermittent bolus, extended and continuous infusion dosing achieved 100% of pharmacodynamic targets against most Gram-negative pathogens. Superior obtainment of pharmacodynamic targets was achieved using administration by extended or continuous infusion against less susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare the relative concentration-time data of bolus and continuous administration of meropenem at the subcutaneous tissue and plasma levels. We found that the administration of meropenem by continuous infusion maintains higher concentrations in subcutaneous tissue and plasma than by intermittent bolus dosing. Administration by extended or continuous infusion will achieve superior CFR against less-susceptible organisms in patients without renal dysfunction.

Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections

Meropenem (Merrem, Meronem) is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent of the carbapenem family, indicated as empirical therapy prior to the identification of causative organisms, or for disease caused by single or multiple susceptible bacteria in both adults and children with a broad range of serious infections. Meropenem is approved for use in complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and bacterial meningitis (in paediatric patients aged > or = 3 months) in the US, and in most other countries for nosocomial pneumonia, cIAI, septicaemia, febrile neutropenia, cSSSI, bacterial meningitis, complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), obstetric and gynaecological infections, in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary exacerbations, and for the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Meropenem has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. It has similar efficacy to comparator antibacterial agents, including: imipenem/cilastatin in cIAI, cSSSI, febrile neutropenia, complicated UTI, obstetric or gynaecological infections and severe CAP; clindamycin plus tobramycin or gentamicin in cIAI or obstetric/gynaecological infections; cefotaxime plus metronidazole in cIAI; cefepime and ceftazidime plus amikacin in septicaemia or febrile neutropenia; and ceftazidime, clarithromycin plus ceftriaxone or amikacin in severe CAP. Meropenem has also shown similar efficacy to cefotaxime in paediatric and adult patients with bacterial meningitis, and to ceftazidime when both agents were administered with or without tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis experiencing acute pulmonary exacerbations. Meropenem showed greater efficacy than ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam in febrile neutropenia, and greater efficacy than ceftazidime plus amikacin or tobramycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Meropenem is well tolerated and has the advantage of being suitable for administration as an intravenous bolus or infusion. Its low propensity for inducing seizures means that it is suitable for treating bacterial meningitis and is the only carbapenem approved in this indication. Thus, meropenem continues to be an important option for the empirical treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in the Intensive Care Unit: setting appropriate dosing regimens

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are at very high risk of developing severe nosocomial infections. Consequently, antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of these patients. Critically ill patients in ICUs include representatives of all age groups with a range of organ dysfunction related to severe acute illness that may complicate long-term illness. The range of organ dysfunction, together with drug interactions and other therapeutic interventions (e.g. haemodynamically active drugs and continuous renal replacement therapies), may strongly impact on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. In the last decade, it has become apparent that the intrinsic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties are the major determinants of in vivo efficacy of antimicrobial agents. PK/PD parameters are essential in facilitating the translation of microbiological activity into clinical situations, ensuring a successful outcome. In this review, we analyse the typical patterns of antimicrobial activity and the corresponding PK/PD parameters, with a special focus on a PK/PD dosing approach of the antimicrobial agent classes commonly utilised in the ICU setting.

The role of carbapenems in the treatment of severe nosocomial respiratory tract infections

The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria continues to increase, particularly in patients in the intensive care unit with nosocomial pneumonia. The intention of this review is to provide an overview of severe nosocomial pneumonia, carbapenems and the problem of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Attention was focused on the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem. Issues on the impact of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for nosocomial pneumonia patients considered at risk for resistant pathogens are discussed. Critical decision making regarding the use of carbapenems for treating severe nosocomial pneumonia requires careful consideration of the four Ds of optimal antimicrobial therapy: right Drug, right Dose, De-escalated to pathogen-directed therapy and right Duration of therapy.

Optimizing therapy with antibacterial agents: use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principles in pediatrics

The appropriate dosage of antibacterial agents is essential in achieving both clinical and microbiologic success in the treatment of infections in children. By using in vitro experimental data and animal model outcome data, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters predictive of antibacterial effect have been elucidated. For time-dependent drugs such as beta-lactams, the PK-PD parameter of interest is the percentage of time in a dosage interval for which drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting organism. For concentration-dependent drugs such as aminoglycosides, the PK-PD parameter of interest is the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the MIC. Recent studies using data on clinical and microbiologic outcomes from infected adults and children, combined with data on drug exposure, have confirmed the importance of these parameters and provided estimates of the PK-PD goals of therapy for various antibacterial agents. Application of these PK-PD principles allows rational dosage regimen selection, both for serious infections in critically ill children and for non-life-threatening community-acquired infections.