Comparison between Elecsys HBsAg II and architect HBsAg QT assays for quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus

Clinical trial and performance evaluation of the Wantai HBsAg (CMIA) diagnostic kit for screening blood donors in China

In China, according to the 'Technical Operating Procedures for Blood Stations (2019 Edition),' blood stations are authorized to utilize Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) to detect pathogen markers linked with transfusion-transmissible infections. However, currently, there is no approved CLIA reagent for the screening of blood-borne diseases in China, specifically for the detection of Hepatitis B surface antigen. The objective of this research project is to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the Wantai Chemiluminescent Microparticle Hepatitis B surface antigen reagent. This study evaluates the performance of the Wantai Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) on the Wan200 + analyzer in screening for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) in blood samples. The clinical trial component of this evaluation is included as part of the documentation submitted to the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China for the approval of blood screening reagents. The evaluation plan of this study encompasses two main components: clinical trials and performance assessment. We adopted a controlled trial design, utilizing the WanTai Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) on the Wan200 + analyzer and the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) to screen for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) in routine blood donor samples and reference serum panel samples. To ensure the accuracy of the screening, we additionally employed Abbott's ELISA reagents and HBV DNA for validation. The assessment primarily focused on key performance indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, and analytical sensitivity. Moreover, this clinical trial data has been included as part of the submission to China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). In the clinical trials of this study, a total of 10,470 blood donor samples underwent simultaneous testing using both CMIA and ELISA methods. Across two clinical trials, there was remarkable concordance between CMIA and the two ELISA reagents, with Kappa values exceeding 0.82. Among the 269 samples that were double-reactive in the enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) tests, CMIA exhibited a 100% reactivity detection rate. However, CMIA produced 14 and 6 false-positive results in the respective clinical trials, resulting in specificities of 99.73% and 99.89%. In contrast, the specificities for Wantai ELISA and Xin Chuang ELISA were both greater than 99.94%.When testing samples in the gray zone serum plates, CMIA's detection limit significantly exceeded that of the two ELISA assays. CMIA had a detection cutoff of 0.05 IU/mL, while the two ELISA reagents had cutoffs of 0.1 IU/mL and 0.09 IU/mL, respectively. CMIA's detection limits for the adr and adw subtypes were 0.05 IU/mL, and for the ay subtype, it was 0.1 U/mL. The detection limit for 10 HBV mutant samples was 0.5 U/mL. In 165 cases where ELISA tested negative but HBV DNA tested positive, CMIA detected 5 HBsAg-positive samples. This study evaluated the performance of the Wantai CMIA in screening for HBsAg among blood donors. The results demonstrate outstanding performance of CMIA in both clinical trials and performance assessments, detecting all true positive samples with a sensitivity of 100%. It exhibits excellent concordance with the two ELISA assays. Of particular note is its superiority in early detection of HBsAg in the screening of early-stage hepatitis B infections, reducing the window period compared to ELISA. CMIA achieves a specificity exceeding 99.73% for negative blood donors, aligning with the European Union's standards for blood screening assay specificity. In summary, Wantai's CMIA displays high sensitivity and specificity in blood donor screening, making it suitable for screening blood donors in China.

Accuracy Validation of the Elecsys HBsAg II Quant Assay and Its Utility in Resolving Equivocal Qualitative HBsAg Results

Background and Objectives: There are reports of false qualitative HBsAg results, because of various causes, such as samples with low HBsAg concentrations that may produce false positives. The main aims of this study were to validate the analytical accuracy and to assess the utility of the Elecsys assay compared to that of the qualitative HbsAg assay as a screening test in resolving equivocal qualitative HbsAg results. Materials and Methods: The limit of blank (LoB), the limit of detection (LoD), the limit of quantification (LoQ), and linearity were estimated to validate the analytical accuracy of the Elecsys HBsAg II Quant assay. A total of 449 serum samples showing initial equivocal results (1–50 index) were evaluated by Elecsys HBsAg II Quant and ADVIA Centaur HBsAg II assays. Results: The LoQ of the assay was determined to be 0.050 IU/mL, as provided by the manufacturer. The Kappa agreement between the two assays was almost perfect, at 0.9669, despite seven discordant results. With a specificity of 100% at new cut-off index value ≥5.42, about 78 samples (17%, 78/449) with index value ≥5.42 were interpreted as positives without further duplicate tests, however the remaining 371 samples with index value <5.42 need to be confirmed with additional HBV marker assays. Conclusions: We confirm that the Elecsys HBsAg II Quant assay is accurate and sensitive for HBV infection and recommend it as an alternative confirmatory HBsAg assay for resolving equivocal qualitative HBsAg results.

A quartz crystal microbalance biosensor based on polyethylenimine-modified gold electrode to detect hepatitis B biomarker

Biomarkers-based QCM-biosensors are suitable tools for the label-free detection of infectious diseases. In the current study, a QCM-biosensor was developed for the detection of HBsAg. Briefly, anti-HBsAg antibodies were covalently bound to the primary amines after PEI and thiolated-PEI surface modifications of gold-electrode. After RSM optimization, the statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the immobilization yields of modified layers. Therefore, the PEI-modified QCM-biosensor was selected for further analysis. The PEI-surface was evaluated by FESEM, AFM, ATR-FTIR, and CA measurement. The surface hydrophilicity and its roughness were increased after PEI-coating. Also, FTIR confirmed the PEI-layering on the gold-surface. RSM optimization increased the antibody immobilization yield up to 80%. The QCM-biosensor showed noteworthy results with a wide dynamic range of 1-1 × 10³ ng/mL, LOD of 3.14 ng/mL, LOQ of 9.52 ng/mL, and detection capability in human-sera, which were comparable with the ELISA. The mean accuracy of the QCM-biosensor was obtained at 91% when measured by the spike recovery test using human-sera. The biosensor was completely regenerated using 50 mM NaOH and 1% SDS. The benefits provided by the developed biosensor such as broad dynamic range, sensitivity, selectivity, stability, regenerate ability, and low cost suggest its potential application for the non-invasive and timely monitoring of HBV-biomarker.

Analytical Performance of the Sysmex HISCL HBsAg Assay and Comparison with the Roche Elecsys HBsAg II Quant Assay in the Quantification of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

Background and Objectives: This study aims to estimate the analytical performance of the Sysmex HISCL HBsAg assay and to assess the analytical correlation with the Roche Elecsys HBsAg II quant assay with clinical samples and the WHO International Standard (IS). Materials and Methods: The intra-assay precision, linearity, assay limitation, accuracy, and comparative evaluation of the HISCL HBsAg assay were estimated. Results: Extrapolating from the plot of the average total allowable error versus the reference value, an accuracy goal of 20% would be achieved around a limit of quantification (LoQ) of 0.014867 IU/mL. The percentage of biases for each level of the WHO IS measured by the two assays were less than 15%, except for the WHO 3rd IS, for which the HISCL HBsAg assay achieved a percentage of bias of 33%. In the comparative evaluation, Passing–Bablok regression analysis did not reveal any significant deviation from linearity between the two assays (y = −48.6998 + 1.9206x; p = 0.79 by the CUSUM test for linearity). The mean difference of the quantitative HBsAg level between the two assays was 1762.5 IU/mL in the Bland–Altman plot. Conclusions: The HISCL HBsAg assay, with a highly sensitive LoQ of 0.03 IU/mL, showed similar analytical performance in HBsAg quantification to the Elecsys HBsAg II quant assay and may be helpful in obtaining better diagnoses and therapeutic strategies for treating HBV infections.

Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Predicts Hepatitis B Transmission in Infants Born to e Antigen-positive Mothers

GOALS

This study aimed to explore whether quantitative surface antigen [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)] can be used as a surrogate marker of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to predict hepatitis B transmission before the first hepatitis vaccine dose in infants born to hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive pregnant women.

BACKGROUND

Currently, HBV transmission persistently occurs worldwide, especially in infants born to e antigen (HBeAg)-positive highly viremic mothers. However, due to high cost, the extensive use of viral load testing to identify these high-risk mothers is limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total of 275 HBeAg-positive pregnant women paired with 280 infants were enrolled in this study. Quantitative HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were measured in the third trimester. Spearman rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between HBsAg levels and viral load, and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors related to HBV transmission in infants.

RESULTS

Among 280 infants included, 15 (5.4%) infants were infected with HBV. In this study, we observed that quantitative HBsAg was positively correlated with maternal viral load (r=0.70, P<0.001) and highly predicted HBV transmission in infants born to HBeAg-positive mothers with area under the curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.81). The optimum threshold HBsAg levels above 4.6 log10 IU/mL to predict HBV transmission in infants had a sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 67.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative HBsAg could be used as a surrogate marker of HBV DNA levels to predict hepatitis B transmission occurring before the injection of first-dose vaccine in infants born to e antigen-positive mothers.

ELISA for Quantitative Determination of Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen

Several studies have reported a good correlation between levels of serum hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) before and after antiviral therapy. As a result, the quantification of HBsAg levels has attracted much attention in recent years as an important approach to evaluate viral activity. In this study, mAbs against HBsAg were generated and 9 mAbs (H17, H30, H31, H67, H73, H97, H101, H118, and H128) were investigated for optimization of HBsAg quantitation ELISA. Determination of the best combinations of mAbs for sandwich ELISA identified H17 and H31 mAbs as the ideal capture and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate mAbs, respectively. A standard curve for the current assay system exhibited linearity up to 40 ng/ml of HBsAg while a detection limit of approximately 1 ng/ml of HBsAg was also estimated, which was comparable to that of the other commercial ELISA kits. The ELISA system established in this study is particularly differentiated from other commercial kits in using mAbs for both capture and HRP conjugate, which provides a solution to inconsistency of quality and ethical issues in polyclonal antibodies production using laboratory animals.

Intensification with pegylated interferon during treatment with tenofovir in HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infected patients

In hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) positive patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) mono-infection, intensification of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment with pegylated interferon (PegIFN) could help induce higher HBeAg seroclearance rates. Our aim was to determine the long-term effect of adding PegIFN to tenofovir (TDF)-containing antiretroviral therapy on seroclearance in HBeAg-positive patients co-infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV. In this prospective matched cohort study, 46 patients with 1-year PegIFN intensification during TDF-containing antiretroviral therapy (TDF+PegIFN) were matched 1:1 to controls undergoing TDF without PegIFN (TDF) using a time-dependent propensity score based on age, CD4+ count and liver cirrhosis status. Kinetics of HBeAg quantification (qHBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen quantification (qHBsAg) were estimated using mixed-effect linear regression and time to HBeAg seroclearance or HBsAg seroclearance was modelled using proportional hazards regression. At baseline, previous TDF exposure was a median 39.8 months (IQR=21.4-59.4) and median qHBeAg and qHBsAg levels were 6.9 PEIU/mL and 3.72 log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively (P>.5 between groups). Median follow-up was 33.4 months (IQR=19.0-36.3). During intensification, faster average declines of qHBeAg (-0.066 vs -0.027 PEIU/mL/month, P=.001) and qHBsAg (-0.049 vs -0.026 log₁₀ IU/mL/month, P=.09) were observed in patients undergoing TDF+PegIFN vs TDF, respectively. After intensification, qHBeAg and qHBsAg decline was no different between groups (P=.7 and P=.9, respectively). Overall, no differences were observed in HBeAg seroclearance (TDF+PegIFN=13.2 vs TDF=12.6/100 person·years, P=.5) or HBsAg seroclearance rates (TDF+PegIFN=1.8 vs TDF=1.3/100 person·years, P=.7). In conclusion, PegIFN intensification in HBeAg-positive co-infected patients did not lead to increased rates of HBeAg or HBsAg clearance, despite faster declines of antigen levels while on PegIFN.

Update on hepatitis B and C virus diagnosis

Viral hepatitis B and C virus (HBV and HCV) are responsible for the most of chronic liver disease worldwide and are transmitted by parenteral route, sexual and vertical transmission. One important measure to reduce the burden of these infections is the diagnosis of acute and chronic cases of HBV and HCV. In order to provide an effective diagnosis and monitoring of antiviral treatment, it is important to choose sensitive, rapid, inexpensive, and robust analytical methods. Primary diagnosis of HBV and HCV infection is made by using serological tests for detecting antigens and antibodies against these viruses. In order to confirm primary diagnosis, to quantify viral load, to determine genotypes and resistance mutants for antiviral treatment, qualitative and quantitative molecular tests are used. In this manuscript, we review the current serological and molecular methods for the diagnosis of hepatitis B and C.

Comparison of two immunoassays for quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen in Chinese patients with concomitant hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B surface antibodies

Two commercial quantitative immunoassay platforms are currently available for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) within a wide range of concentrations: the Architect HBsAg assay and the Elecsys HBsAg II. However, there are limited data concerning their performance in patients who are positive for both HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies. In the present study, 127 serum samples from Chinese patients with hepatitis B carrying both HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies were analyzed. HBsAg levels measured in parallel using the Elecsys HBsAg II and Architect HBsAg assay were compared. There was a significant correlation between HBsAg levels measured by Elecsys HBsAg II and Architect HBsAg assay (correlation coefficient, r = 0.992, P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis indicated only minor discordance between the methods (mean difference between Elecsys HBsAg II and Architect HBsAg assay, -0.02 log10 IU/ml; 95 % confidence interval, -0.40-0.37 log10 IU/ml). In conclusion, the results of the quantitative Elecsys HBsAg II were highly correlated with those of the Architect HBsAg assay in patients carrying both HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies, but differences were observed between the platforms in samples with low HBsAg levels.

Detection of Hepatitis B Virus Large Surface Protein Using a Time-Resolved Immunofluorometric Assay

BACKGROUND

To establish a novel method based on time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (TR-IFMA) with higher sensitivity and a broader detection range for detecting serum hepatitis B virus large surface protein (L protein).

METHODS

The precision, sensitivity, specificity, coefficient of recovery, and stability of the assay were evaluated and comparison with the classical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was also executed.

RESULTS

The precision, specificity, and sensitivity of the TR-IFMA were clearly better than ELISA. Particularly, the sensitivity was 0.1 ng/ml; moreover, the specificity was 100%, 96%, 92.5%, 96.9%, 97.8%, and 100% in the sera of healthy blood donors, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection patients, and pregnant patients, respectively. Meanwhile, we observed that the established TR-IFMA kit has a wider acceptable linear range of 0.63-10,367 ng/ml rather than the regular commercial ELISA kit having range of only 10.12-1095.9 ng/ml. Subsequently, correlation coefficient between the TR-IFMA and ELISA was 0.8009. The intra- and interassay precision rates were less than 5% for three different concentrations. The average recovery rate for L protein was 101.17%. In sum, the established assay kit performed better in terms of stability than the commercial ELISA kit.

CONCLUSION

The TR-IFMA that we developed for L protein presented a higher sensitivity and wider detecting range than regular commercial ELISA. Therefore, this TR-IFMA has promising value both in the screening of HBV and monitoring of antiviral therapy.

Is HBsAg quantification ready, for prime time?

Despite the availability of an efficient hepatitis B vaccine, approximately 240 million individuals are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus worldwide. One-fourth of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients will develop complications, such as cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma, both major causes of liver-related deaths. Antiviral therapies, such as pegylated interferon alpha or nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, are effective in suppressing HBV DNA and reducing the subsequent risk of fibrosis progression, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBsAg has proven to be a steady, reliable marker of chronic HBV carriage that can also be used to predict clinical outcomes. Three commercial enzyme immunoassays are now available for HBsAg quantification. A number of recent studies have shown clinical utility of HBsAg quantification in combination with HBV DNA levels to identify inactive carriers who need antiviral therapy and in interferon treated-patients in order to predict the virological response to pegylated interferon alpha.

Characterization of hepatitis B virus genotypes and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen titres in North American tertiary referral liver centres

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) have been related to clinical outcome. In this nationwide cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the epidemiology and clinical significance of HBV genotype and qHBsAg in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

Six hundred and thirty patients with CHB were seen in four urban tertiary referral centres in Canada. HBV genotype was determined by line probe assay (INNO-LIPA) and HBV DNA quantified by commercial PCR (Roche TaqMan, sensitivity <55 IU/ml or AMPLICOR, sensitivity <60 IU/ml). Titres of qHBsAg were determined by an in-house assay based on the WHO standard (calibration range 0.24-62.5 IU/ml).

RESULTS

In 630 patients (57% male, 69% Asian, median age 42 years), 21% were hepatitis B e antigen positive and the median alanine aminotransferase was 29 U/L. The HBV genotype distribution was A (16%), B (29%), C (31%), D (16%), E (6%). HBV genotype was strongly associated with ethnicity, but neither genotype nor qHBsAg correlated with the degree of fibrosis. In the treatment-naïve patients, the baseline qHBsAg levels correlated with HBV DNA (r = 0.2517, P < 0.0008). The median qHBsAg levels were lowest in patients with genotype B (P < 0.0001), but no significant correlation was noted with all other HBV genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large North American HBV epidemiological study, genotypes B and C were the most common; however, all genotypes (A-E) were observed with varied distribution nationwide. Baseline qHBsAg significantly correlated with HBV DNA and with HBV genotype B, but not with liver fibrosis.

A predictive value of quantitative HBsAg for serum HBV DNA level among HBeAg-positive pregnant women

BACKGROUND

The high maternal HBV DNA level is the most important factor contributing to HBV perinatal transmission. This study is to explore whether HBsAg can be used as a surrogate marker of serum HBV DNA for HBsAg-positive pregnant women.

METHODS

A total of 975 HBsAg-positive pregnant women and their infants were enrolled in this study. All infants received three doses of a yeast-derived recombinant Hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1 and 6 months. They were also given Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) at birth. HBsAg and HBeAg were determined using Abbott Architect assays while serum HBV DNA level was detected by the Abbott Real Time HBV DNA assay.

RESULTS

Of the 975 subjects, 367 (37.6%) were HBeAg-positive and 608 (62.4%) were HBeAg-negative. Among the HBeAg-positive group, the samples with HBV DNA levels of ≥7.0 logIU/mL were 76.6% (281/367), and it was only 0.7% (4/608) for the HBeAg-negative group. HBV DNA level was positively correlated with HBsAg in HBeAg-positive group (r=0.786, p<0.001) but not in HBeAg-negative group (r=0.022, p=0.593). Among HBeAg-positive group, the area under the receiver-operator curve (ROC) of HBsAg titer for high HBV DNA level (≥7.0 logIU/mL) was 0.961 (95% CI, 0.940-0.983, p<0.001). The optimum cut-off point HBsAg titer above 4.1 logIU/mL had a sensitivity of 85.1%, specificity of 96.5%, and accuracy of 87.5% to predict HBV DNA levels of ≥7.0 logIU/mL. Of 367 infants born to mothers with HBeAg-positive, perinatal transmission was detected in 24 infants (6.5%, 24/367). Their mothers all had serum HBV DNA levels of ≥7.0 logIU/mL, 23 (95.8%) had HBsAg titers of ≥4.1 logIU/mL and the other mother had HBsAg titer of 3.9 logIU/mL. Of 608 infants born to mothers with HBeAg-negative, only one (0.2%, 1/608) became HBsAg-positive at the age of 7 months, and the mother of the infant had serum HBV DNA level of 3.4 logIU/mL and HBsAg titer of 1.8 logIU/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Serum HBsAg titer may be used as a surrogate marker of serum HBV DNA for HBeAg-positive pregnant women.