1
|
Liu F, Lee SA, Xue J, Riordan SM, Zhang L. Global epidemiology of campylobacteriosis and the impact of COVID-19. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12:979055. [PMID: 36519137 PMCID: PMC9742372 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.979055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Campylobacteriosis is a gastroenteritis caused by pathogenic Campylobacter species and an important topic in public health. Here we review the global epidemiology of campylobacteriosis in the last eight years between 2014-2021, providing comprehensive and updated information on the reported incidence and outbreaks of Campylobacter infections. The government public health website of each of the 195 countries and publications from 2014 to September 2022 in public databases were searched. The reported incidence of campylobacteriosis in pre-COVID-19 years was compared to that during the COVID-19 pandemic in countries where data were available. Czech Republic had the highest reported incidence of campylobacteriosis worldwide (215 per 100,000 in 2019), followed by Australia (146.8 per 100,000 in 2016) and New Zealand (126.1 per 100,000 in 2019). Campylobacter was one of the most common human enteric pathogens in both developed and developing countries. About 90% of cases of campylobacteriosis were caused by Campylobacter jejuni, whereas less than 10% of cases were caused by Campylobacter coli. Other Campylobacter species were also isolated. The reported incidence and case numbers of campylobacteriosis in developed nations have remained steadily high prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, whilst some countries reported an increasing trend such as France and Japan. While outbreaks were more frequently reported in some countries, Campylobacter infections were mainly sporadic cases in most of the developed countries. Campylobacter infection was more common in summer in some but not all countries. Campylobacter infection was more common in males than females. The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the reported incidence of campylobacteriosis in most countries where 2020 epidemiology data were available. In conclusion, Campylobacter infection remains a global health concern. Increased research and improved strategies are needed for prevention and reduction of Campylobacter infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Liu
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Seul A. Lee
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica Xue
- Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen M. Riordan
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Li Zhang
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia,*Correspondence: Li Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shimojima Y, Shimojima H, Morita Y. Survival of Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes and Temperature Change in Low-Temperature-Longtime-Cooked Chicken Meat. J Food Prot 2022; 85:1166-1171. [PMID: 35687739 DOI: 10.4315/jfp-22-114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Low-temperature and longtime (LT-LT) cooking, also known as sous vide cooking, is the process in which meat is sealed in a bag and cooked in hot water at a relatively low temperature of around 60°C. This cooking method has increased in popularity, and low-temperature cookers for home use are now commercially available. However, after LT-LT cooking, if any foodborne bacteria remain, they could cause infection and foodborne illnesses. Therefore, in the present study, the aim was to determine the appropriate LT-LT cooking methods for chicken by assessing temperature changes and studying the bacteria in LT-LT-cooked chicken meat. At set cooking temperatures of 60 and 65°C, the temperatures were measured at the surface and in the centers of single- and double-layer samples of 300 g of chicken breast meat. The times required to reach 50°C were 5 to 14 min at the surface, 25 min in the center of the single-layer sample, and 33 to 35 min in the center of the double-layer sample. The time taken to reach 50°C was fastest in the surface of single-layer chicken meat, followed by the center of single-layer and double-layer chicken meat (P < 0.05). When the meat was LT-LT cooked at 60 and 65°C for 60 min, color changes in the meat and heating of the meat were observed all the way to the interior. Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella O7, and Listeria monocytogenes were inoculated into chicken breasts, which were then cooked at set temperatures of 60 and 65°C for 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. C. jejuni survived for up to 30 min of cooking, Salmonella O7 survived for up to 60 min of cooking at 60°C and 30 min at 65°C, and L. monocytogenes survived for up to 90 min of cooking at 60°C and 60 min at 65°C. Thus, to prevent infection and illness caused by the three tested bacteria species, LT-LT cooking for 120 min at 60°C and 90 min at 65°C is recommended. HIGHLIGHTS
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukako Shimojima
- Department of Nutritional Management, Sagami Women's University, 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Minami-ku, Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa, 252-0383, Japan
| | - Hazuki Shimojima
- Toho University School of Medicine, 5-21-16 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan
| | - Yukio Morita
- School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University, 1-17-71 Fuchinobe, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5201, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stevens EL, Carleton HA, Beal J, Tillman GE, Lindsey RL, Lauer AC, Pightling A, Jarvis KG, Ottesen A, Ramachandran P, Hintz L, Katz LS, Folster JP, Whichard JM, Trees E, Timme RE, McDERMOTT P, Wolpert B, Bazaco M, Zhao S, Lindley S, Bruce BB, Griffin PM, Brown E, Allard M, Tallent S, Irvin K, Hoffmann M, Wise M, Tauxe R, Gerner-Smidt P, Simmons M, Kissler B, Defibaugh-Chavez S, Klimke W, Agarwala R, Lindsay J, Cook K, Austerman SR, Goldman D, McGARRY S, Hale KR, Dessai U, Musser SM, Braden C. Use of Whole Genome Sequencing by the Federal Interagency Collaboration for Genomics for Food and Feed Safety in the United States. J Food Prot 2022; 85:755-772. [PMID: 35259246 DOI: 10.4315/jfp-21-437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This multiagency report developed by the Interagency Collaboration for Genomics for Food and Feed Safety provides an overview of the use of and transition to whole genome sequencing (WGS) technology for detection and characterization of pathogens transmitted commonly by food and for identification of their sources. We describe foodborne pathogen analysis, investigation, and harmonization efforts among the following federal agencies: National Institutes of Health; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Agricultural Research Service, and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. We describe single nucleotide polymorphism, core-genome, and whole genome multilocus sequence typing data analysis methods as used in the PulseNet (CDC) and GenomeTrakr (FDA) networks, underscoring the complementary nature of the results for linking genetically related foodborne pathogens during outbreak investigations while allowing flexibility to meet the specific needs of Interagency Collaboration partners. We highlight how we apply WGS to pathogen characterization (virulence and antimicrobial resistance profiles) and source attribution efforts and increase transparency by making the sequences and other data publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. We also highlight the impact of current trends in the use of culture-independent diagnostic tests for human diagnostic testing on analytical approaches related to food safety and what is next for the use of WGS in the area of food safety. HIGHLIGHTS
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L Stevens
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Heather A Carleton
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Jennifer Beal
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Glenn E Tillman
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC 20250
| | - Rebecca L Lindsey
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - A C Lauer
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Arthur Pightling
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Karen G Jarvis
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Andrea Ottesen
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Padmini Ramachandran
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Leslie Hintz
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Lee S Katz
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Jason P Folster
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Jean M Whichard
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Eija Trees
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Ruth E Timme
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Patrick McDERMOTT
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Laurel, Maryland 20708
| | - Beverly Wolpert
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Michael Bazaco
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Shaohua Zhao
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Laurel, Maryland 20708
| | - Sabina Lindley
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Beau B Bruce
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Patricia M Griffin
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Eric Brown
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Marc Allard
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Sandra Tallent
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Kari Irvin
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Maria Hoffmann
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Matt Wise
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Robert Tauxe
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Peter Gerner-Smidt
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Mustafa Simmons
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC 20250
| | - Bonnie Kissler
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC 20250
| | | | - William Klimke
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894
| | - Richa Agarwala
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894
| | - James Lindsay
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
| | - Kimberly Cook
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
| | - Suelee Robbe Austerman
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
| | - David Goldman
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC 20250
| | - Sherri McGARRY
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| | - Kis Robertson Hale
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC 20250
| | - Uday Dessai
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC 20250
| | - Steven M Musser
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740
| | - Chris Braden
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia 30329
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Linn KZ, Furuta M, Nakayama M, Masuda Y, Honjoh KI, Miyamoto T. Characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from chicken and pork. Int J Food Microbiol 2021; 360:109440. [PMID: 34673329 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile were investigated in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in chicken and pork in Fukuoka, Japan in 2019. Their AMR profiles were compared with those of C. jejuni and C. coli strains isolated in 2013. A total of 53 chicken and 14 pork samples were collected from different supermarkets in Fukuoka in 2019. Campylobacter spp. were isolated by conventional method and characterized by PCR and MALDI-TOF MS. Among 53 chicken samples tested in 2019, 24.5% and 5.7% were positive for C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively, and three (21.4%) of 14 pork samples were positive for C. coli, but not C. jejuni. From the positive samples, 13 and six strains of C. jejuni and C. coli were isolated, respectively. Antimicrobial susceptibility test against 12 different antimicrobials were performed on 48 isolates (43 C. jejuni and five C. coli) from chicken in 2013 and 19 isolates (13 C. jejuni from chicken, three C. coli from chicken and three C. coli from pork) in 2019 using the disk diffusion method. All the C. jejuni and C. coli isolated in 2013 and 2019 were highly resistant to cefazolin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Among the C. jejuni isolates from chickens, 25.6% of 2013 isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin, and 7% to ampicillin and minocycline, while 30.8% of the isolates were resistant to minocycline, 23.1% to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin, and 15.4% to ampicillin in 2019. Among the C. coli isolates, 80% of isolates from chickens in 2013, and 33.3% from chicken and 100% from pork in 2019 were resistant to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. The frequency of multi-drug resistant (MDR) C. jejuni and C. coli strains from chickens in 2019 were 30.8% and 33.3%, respectively, which were lower than those isolated in 2013 (37.2% and 100%, respectively). One C. jejuni and two C. coli isolates from 2013 were resistant to six antibiotics. However, two C. jejuni and one C. coli isolate from chickens in 2019 were resistant to seven and five antibiotics, respectively. All the C. coli isolates from pork in 2019 were resistant to five antibiotics. The high frequency of AMR strains in C. coli isolates from pork suggests that appropriate use of antimicrobials is required in swine husbandry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khin Zar Linn
- Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School, Kyushu University, 744, Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan; Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Veterinary Science, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar
| | - Munenori Furuta
- Department of Food Management, Nakamura Gakuen University Junior College, 5-7-1, Befu, Jounan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0198, Japan
| | - Motokazu Nakayama
- Department of Life Science, Faculty of Life Science, Kyushu Sangyo University, 2-3-1, Matsukadai, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 813-8503, Japan
| | - Yoshimitsu Masuda
- Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School, Kyushu University, 744, Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Honjoh
- Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School, Kyushu University, 744, Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| | - Takahisa Miyamoto
- Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School, Kyushu University, 744, Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vetchapitak T, Misawa N. Current Status of Campylobacter Food Poisoning in Japan. Food Saf (Tokyo) 2019; 7:61-73. [PMID: 31998589 PMCID: PMC6977775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 03/29/2024] Open
Abstract
According to the annual food poisoning statistics compiled by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan, Campylobacter replaced Salmonella and Vibrio parahaemolyticus as the leading bacterium responsible for food poisoning in 2003. Although in 2006 the number of cases of Campylobacter food poisoning was 3,439 on the basis of the MHLW statistics, it was estimated to be 1,545,363 on the basis of active surveillance, suggesting that passive surveillance yields an incidence about 450 times lower than that revealed by active surveillance. Epidemiological investigations of Campylobacter food poisoning in Japan have shown that chicken meat and its products are the most important sources of infection, as is the case in other industrialized nations. Over the last two decades, the consumption of fresh raw chicken meat and liver has been increasing in Japan. Although the MHLW recommends that chicken meat should only be eaten after thorough cooking, it is likely to account for much of the increased incidence of human campylobacteriosis. In response to this situation, the Expert Committee on Microorganisms/Viruses, Food Safety Commission of Japan, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan (FSCJ) has revised the previous risk profile of C. jejuni/coli in chicken meat by adding new findings for 2018. Moreover, the MHLW revised the Poultry Slaughtering Business Control and Poultry Meat Inspection Act in 2014 aiming at stepwise introduction of the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system into poultry processing plants. Subsequently, the Japanese government amended the Food Sanitation Act in 2018, requiring all food business operators to implement hygiene control based on HACCP principles as a general rule. This paper reviews the current status of Campylobacter food poisoning due to consumption of chicken meat in Japan and extracts the issues underlying each step of the food supply chain in order to examine the implementation of effective measures for risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torrung Vetchapitak
- Graduate School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine,
University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara-kiyotakecho, Miyazaki
889-1692, Japan
- Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health, Department of
Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, 1-1
Gakuenkibanadai-nishi, Miyazaki 889-2192,
Japan
| | - Naoaki Misawa
- Graduate School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine,
University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara-kiyotakecho, Miyazaki
889-1692, Japan
- Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health, Department of
Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, 1-1
Gakuenkibanadai-nishi, Miyazaki 889-2192,
Japan
- Center for Animal Disease Control, University of
Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuenkibanadai-nishi, Miyazaki 889-2192,
Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
According to the annual food poisoning statistics compiled by the Ministry of
Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan, Campylobacter
replaced Salmonella and Vibrio
parahaemolyticus as the leading bacterium responsible for food
poisoning in 2003. Although in 2006 the number of cases of
Campylobacter food poisoning was 3,439 on the basis of the
MHLW statistics, it was estimated to be 1,545,363 on the basis of active
surveillance, suggesting that passive surveillance yields an incidence about 450
times lower than that revealed by active surveillance. Epidemiological
investigations of Campylobacter food poisoning in Japan have
shown that chicken meat and its products are the most important sources of
infection, as is the case in other industrialized nations. Over the last two
decades, the consumption of fresh raw chicken meat and liver has been increasing
in Japan. Although the MHLW recommends that chicken meat should only be eaten
after thorough cooking, it is likely to account for much of the increased
incidence of human campylobacteriosis. In response to this situation, the Expert
Committee on Microorganisms/Viruses, Food Safety Commission of Japan, Cabinet
Office, Government of Japan (FSCJ) has revised the previous risk profile of
C. jejuni/coli in chicken meat by adding
new findings for 2018. Moreover, the MHLW revised the Poultry Slaughtering
Business Control and Poultry Meat Inspection Act in 2014 aiming at stepwise
introduction of the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system into
poultry processing plants. Subsequently, the Japanese government amended the
Food Sanitation Act in 2018, requiring all food business operators to implement
hygiene control based on HACCP principles as a general rule. This paper reviews
the current status of Campylobacter food poisoning due to
consumption of chicken meat in Japan and extracts the issues underlying each
step of the food supply chain in order to examine the implementation of
effective measures for risk management.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ricke SC, Feye KM, Chaney WE, Shi Z, Pavlidis H, Yang Y. Developments in Rapid Detection Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Campylobacter in the United States. Front Microbiol 2019; 9:3280. [PMID: 30728816 PMCID: PMC6351486 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The accurate and rapid detection of Campylobacter spp. is critical for optimal surveillance throughout poultry processing in the United States. The further development of highly specific and sensitive assays to detect Campylobacter in poultry matrices has tremendous utility and potential for aiding the reduction of foodborne illness. The introduction and development of molecular methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have enhanced the diagnostic capabilities of the food industry to identify the presence of foodborne pathogens throughout poultry production. Further innovations in various methodologies, such as immune-based typing and detection as well as high throughput analyses, will provide important epidemiological data such as the identification of unique or region-specific Campylobacter. Comparable to traditional microbiology and enrichment techniques, molecular techniques/methods have the potential to have improved sensitivity and specificity, as well as speed of data acquisition. This review will focus on the development and application of rapid molecular methods for identifying and quantifying Campylobacter in U.S. poultry and the emergence of novel methods that are faster and more precise than traditional microbiological techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C. Ricke
- Department of Food Science, Center of Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States
| | - Kristina M. Feye
- Department of Food Science, Center of Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States
| | | | - Zhaohao Shi
- Department of Food Science, Center of Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States
| | | | - Yichao Yang
- Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States
| |
Collapse
|