Experimental Analysis of Functional Variation within Protein Families: Receiver Domain Autodephosphorylation Kinetics

Structural and functional insights underlying recognition of histidine phosphotransfer protein in fungal phosphorelay systems

In human pathogenic fungi, receiver domains from hybrid histidine kinases (hHK) have to recognize one HPt. To understand the recognition mechanism, we have assessed phosphorelay from receiver domains of five hHKs of group III, IV, V, VI, and XI to HPt from Chaetomium thermophilum and obtained the structures of Ct_HPt alone and in complex with the receiver domain of hHK group VI. Our data indicate that receiver domains phosphotransfer to Ct_HPt, show a low affinity for complex formation, and prevent a Leu-Thr switch to stabilize phosphoryl groups, also derived from the structures of the receiver domains of hHK group III and Candida albicans Sln1. Moreover, we have elucidated the envelope structure of C. albicans Ypd1 using small-angle X-ray scattering which reveals an extended flexible conformation of the long loop αD-αE which is not involved in phosphotransfer. Finally, we have analyzed the role of salt bridges in the structure of Ct_HPt alone.

Structure of phosphorylated-like RssB, the adaptor delivering σs to the ClpXP proteolytic machinery, reveals an interface switch for activation

In enterobacteria such as Escherichia coli, the general stress response is mediated by σs, the stationary phase dissociable promoter specificity subunit of RNA polymerase. σs is degraded by ClpXP during active growth in a process dependent on the RssB adaptor, which is thought to be stimulated by the phosphorylation of a conserved aspartate in its N-terminal receiver domain. Here we present the crystal structure of full-length RssB bound to a beryllofluoride phosphomimic. Compared to the structure of RssB bound to the IraD anti-adaptor, our new RssB structure with bound beryllofluoride reveals conformational differences and coil-to-helix transitions in the C-terminal region of the RssB receiver domain and in the interdomain segmented helical linker. These are accompanied by masking of the α4-β5-α5 (4-5-5) "signaling" face of the RssB receiver domain by its C-terminal domain. Critically, using hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, we identify σs-binding determinants on the 4-5-5 face, implying that this surface needs to be unmasked to effect an interdomain interface switch and enable full σs engagement and hand-off to ClpXP. In activated receiver domains, the 4-5-5 face is often the locus of intermolecular interactions, but its masking by intramolecular contacts upon phosphorylation is unusual, emphasizing that RssB is a response regulator that undergoes atypical regulation.

General strategies for using amino acid sequence data to guide biochemical investigation of protein function

The rapid increase of '-omics' data warrants the reconsideration of experimental strategies to investigate general protein function. Studying individual members of a protein family is likely insufficient to provide a complete mechanistic understanding of family functions, especially for diverse families with thousands of known members. Strategies that exploit large amounts of available amino acid sequence data can inspire and guide biochemical experiments, generating broadly applicable insights into a given family. Here we review several methods that utilize abundant sequence data to focus experimental efforts and identify features truly representative of a protein family or domain. First, coevolutionary relationships between residues within primary sequences can be successfully exploited to identify structurally and/or functionally important positions for experimental investigation. Second, functionally important variable residue positions typically occupy a limited sequence space, a property useful for guiding biochemical characterization of the effects of the most physiologically and evolutionarily relevant amino acids. Third, amino acid sequence variation within domains shared between different protein families can be used to sort a particular domain into multiple subtypes, inspiring further experimental designs. Although generally applicable to any kind of protein domain because they depend solely on amino acid sequences, the second and third approaches are reviewed in detail because they appear to have been used infrequently and offer immediate opportunities for new advances. Finally, we speculate that future technologies capable of analyzing and manipulating conserved and variable aspects of the three-dimensional structures of a protein family could lead to broad insights not attainable by current methods.

Generalizable strategy to analyze domains in the context of parent protein architecture: A CheW case study

Domains are the three-dimensional building blocks of proteins. An individual domain can occur in a variety of domain architectures that perform unique functions and are subject to different evolutionary selective pressures. We describe an approach to evaluate the variability in amino acid sequences of a single domain across architectural contexts. The ability to distinguish different evolutionary outcomes of one protein domain can help determine whether existing knowledge about a specific domain will apply to an uncharacterized protein, lead to insights and hypotheses about function, and guide experimental priorities. We developed and tested our approach on CheW-like domains (PF01584), which mediate protein/protein interactions and are difficult to compare experimentally. CheW-like domains occur in CheW scaffolding proteins, CheA kinases, and CheV proteins that regulate bacterial chemotaxis. We analyzed 16 domain architectures that included 94% of all CheW-like domains found in nature. We identified six Classes of CheW-like domains with presumed functional differences. CheV and most CheW proteins contained Class 1 domains, whereas some CheW proteins contained Class 6 (~20%) or Class 2 (~1%) domains instead. Most CheA proteins contained Class 3 domains. CheA proteins with multiple Hpt domains contained Class 4 domains. CheA proteins with two CheW-like domains contained one Class 3 and one Class 5. We also created SimpLogo, an innovative method for visualizing amino acid composition across large sets of multiple sequence alignments of arbitrary length. SimpLogo offers substantial advantages over standard sequence logos for comparison and analysis of related protein sequences. The R package for SimpLogo is freely available.

Predicted Functional and Structural Diversity of Receiver Domains in Fungal Two-Component Regulatory Systems

Fungal two-component regulatory systems incorporate receiver domains into hybrid histidine kinases (HHKs) and response regulators. We constructed a nonredundant database of 670 fungal receiver domain sequences from 51 species sampled from nine fungal phyla. A much greater proportion (21%) of predicted fungal response regulators did not belong to known groups than previously appreciated. Receiver domains in Rim15 response regulators from Ascomycota and other phyla are very different from one another, as are the duplicate receiver domains in group XII HHKs. Fungal receiver domains from five known types of response regulators and 20 known types of HHKs exhibit distinct patterns of amino acids at conserved and variable positions known to be structurally and functionally important in bacterial receiver domains. We inferred structure/activity relationships from the patterns and propose multiple experimentally testable hypotheses about the mechanisms of signal transduction mediated by fungal receiver domains.

Role of Position K+4 in the Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation Reaction Kinetics of the CheY Response Regulator

Two-component signaling is a primary method by which microorganisms interact with their environments. A kinase detects stimuli and modulates autophosphorylation activity. The signal propagates by phosphotransfer from the kinase to a response regulator, eliciting a response. Response regulators operate over a range of time scales, corresponding to their related biological processes. Response regulator active site chemistry is highly conserved, but certain variable residues can influence phosphorylation kinetics. An Ala-to-Pro substitution (K+4, residue 113) in the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY triggers a constitutively active phenotype; however, the A113P substitution is too far from the active site to directly affect phosphochemistry. To better understand the activating mechanism(s) of the substitution, we analyzed receiver domain sequences to characterize the evolutionary role of the K+4 position. Although most featured Pro, Leu, Ile, and Val residues, chemotaxis-related proteins exhibited atypical Ala, Gly, Asp, and Glu residues at K+4. Structural and in silico analyses revealed that CheY A113P adopted a partially active configuration. Biochemical data showed that A113P shifted CheY toward a more activated state, enhancing autophosphorylation. By characterizing CheY variants, we determined that this functionality was transmitted through a hydrophobic network bounded by the β5α5 loop and the α1 helix of CheY. This region also interacts with the phosphodonor CheA_P1, suggesting that binding generates an activating perturbation similar to the A113P substitution. Atypical residues like Ala at the K+4 position likely serve two purposes. First, restricting autophosphorylation may minimize background noise generated by intracellular phosphodonors such as acetyl phosphate. Second, optimizing interactions with upstream partners may help prime the receiver domain for phosphorylation.

Phospho-dependent signaling during the general stress response by the atypical response regulator and ClpXP adaptor RssB

In the model organism Escherichia coli and related species, the general stress response relies on tight regulation of the intracellular levels of the promoter specificity subunit RpoS. RpoS turnover is exclusively dependent on RssB, a two-domain response regulator that functions as an adaptor that delivers RpoS to ClpXP for proteolysis. Here, we report crystal structures of the receiver domain of RssB both in its unphosphorylated form and bound to the phosphomimic BeF₃ ^- . Surprisingly, we find only modest differences between these two structures, suggesting that truncating RssB may partially activate the receiver domain to a "meta-active" state. Our structural and sequence analysis points to RssB proteins not conforming to either the Y-T coupling scheme for signaling seen in prototypical response regulators, such as CheY, or to the signaling model of the less understood FATGUY proteins.

Modulation of Response Regulator CheY Reaction Kinetics by Two Variable Residues That Affect Conformation

Microorganisms and plants utilize two-component systems to regulate adaptive responses to changing environmental conditions. Sensor kinases detect stimuli and alter their autophosphorylation activity accordingly. Signal propagation occurs via the transfer of phosphoryl groups from upstream kinases to downstream response regulator proteins. Removal of phosphoryl groups from the response regulator typically resets the system. Members of the same protein family may catalyze phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions with different efficiencies, exhibiting rate constants spanning many orders of magnitude to accommodate response time scales from milliseconds to days. We previously found that variable positions one or two residues to the C-terminal side of the conserved Asp phosphorylation site (D+2) or Thr/Ser (T+1/T+2) in response regulators alter reaction kinetics by direct interaction with phosphodonor or phosphoacceptor molecules. Here, we explore the kinetic effects of amino acid substitutions at the two positions immediately C-terminal to the conserved Lys (K+1/K+2) in the model Escherichia coli response regulator CheY. We measured CheY autophosphorylation and autodephosphorylation rate constants for 27 pairs of K+1/K+2 residues that represent 84% of naturally occurring response regulators. Effects on autodephosphorylation were modest, but autophosphorylation rate constants varied by 2 orders of magnitude, suggesting that the K+1/K+2 positions influence reaction kinetics by altering the conformational spectrum sampled by CheY at equilibrium. Additional evidence supporting this indirect mechanism includes the following: the effect on autophosphorylation rate constants is independent of the phosphodonor, the autophosphorylation rate constants and dissociation constants for the phosphoryl group analog BeF₃ ^- are inversely correlated, and the K+1/K+2 positions are distant from the phosphorylation site.IMPORTANCE We have identified five variable positions in response regulators that allow the rate constants of autophosphorylation and autodephosporylation reactions each to be altered over 3 orders of magnitude in CheY. The distributions of variable residue combinations across response regulator subfamilies suggest that distinct mechanisms associated with different variable positions allow reaction rates to be tuned independently during evolution for diverse biological purposes. This knowledge could be used in synthetic-biology applications to adjust the properties (e.g., background noise and response duration) of biosensors and may allow prediction of response regulator reaction kinetics from the primary amino acid sequence.

Two-Component Sensing and Regulation: How Do Histidine Kinases Talk with Response Regulators at the Molecular Level?

Perceiving environmental and internal information and reacting in adaptive ways are essential attributes of living organisms. Two-component systems are relevant protein machineries from prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes that enable cells to sense and process signals. Implicating sensory histidine kinases and response regulator proteins, both components take advantage of protein phosphorylation and flexibility to switch conformations in a signal-dependent way. Dozens of two-component systems act simultaneously in any given cell, challenging our understanding about the means that ensure proper connectivity. This review dives into the molecular level, attempting to summarize an emerging picture of how histidine kinases and cognate response regulators achieve required efficiency, specificity, and directionality of signaling pathways, properties that rely on protein:protein interactions. α helices that carry information through long distances, the fine combination of loose and specific kinase/regulator interactions, and malleable reaction centers built when the two components meet emerge as relevant universal principles.

Structural Basis of Response Regulator Function

Response regulators function as the output components of two-component systems, which couple the sensing of environmental stimuli to adaptive responses. Response regulators typically contain conserved receiver (REC) domains that function as phosphorylation-regulated switches to control the activities of effector domains that elicit output responses. This modular design is extremely versatile, enabling different regulatory strategies tuned to the needs of individual signaling systems. This review summarizes structural features that underlie response regulator function. An abundance of atomic resolution structures and complementary biochemical data have defined the mechanisms for response regulator enzymatic activities, revealed trends in regulatory strategies utilized by response regulators of different subfamilies, and provided insights into interactions of response regulators with their cognate histidine kinases. Among the hundreds of thousands of response regulators identified, variations abound. This article provides a framework for understanding structural features that enable function of canonical response regulators and a basis for distinguishing noncanonical configurations.

Cross Talk between Chemosensory Pathways That Modulate Chemotaxis and Biofilm Formation

Complex chemosensory systems control multiple biological functions in bacteria, such as chemotaxis, gene regulation, and cell cycle progression. Many species contain more than one chemosensory system per genome, but little is known about their potential interplay. In this study, we reveal cross talk between two chemosensory pathways that modulate chemotaxis and biofilm formation in Comamonas testosteroni We demonstrate that some chemoreceptors that govern chemotaxis also contribute to biofilm formation and these chemoreceptors can physically interact with components of both pathways. Finally, we show that the chemotaxis histidine kinase CheA can phosphorylate not only its cognate response regulator CheY₂ but also one of the response regulators from the pathway mediating biofilm formation, FlmD. The phosphoryl group transfer from CheA to CheY₂ is much faster than that from CheA to FlmD, which is consistent with chemotaxis being a fast response and biofilm formation being a much slower developmental process. We propose that cross talk between chemosensory pathways may play a role in coordination of complex behaviors in bacteria.IMPORTANCE In many bacteria, two or more homologous chemosensory pathways control several cellular functions, such as motility and gene regulation, in response to changes in the cell's microenvironment. Cross talk between signal transduction systems is poorly understood; while generally it is considered to be undesired, in some instances it might be beneficial for coregulation of complex behaviors. We demonstrate that several receptors from the pathway controlling motility can physically interact with downstream components of the pathway controlling biofilm formation. We further show that a kinase from the pathway controlling motility can also phosphorylate a response regulator from the pathway controlling biofilm formation. We propose that cross talk between two chemosensory pathways might be involved in coordination of two types of cell behavior-chemotaxis and biofilm formation.

Mechanism of metal ion-induced activation of a two-component sensor kinase

Two-component systems (TCSs) are essential for bacteria to sense, respond, and adapt to changing environments, such as elevation of Cu(I)/Ag(I) ions in the periplasm. In Escherichia coli, the CusS-CusR TCS up-regulates the cusCFBA genes under increased periplasmic Cu(I)/Ag(I) concentrations to help maintain metal ion homeostasis. The CusS histidine kinase is a homodimeric integral membrane protein that binds to periplasmic Cu(I)/Ag(I) and transduces a signal to its cytoplasmic kinase domain. However, the mechanism of how metal binding in the periplasm activates autophosphorylation in the cytoplasm is unknown. Here, we report that only one of the two metal ion-binding sites in CusS enhances dimerization of the sensor domain. Utilizing nanodisc technology to study full-length CusS, we show that metal-induced dimerization in the sensor domain triggers kinase activity in the cytoplasmic domain. We also investigated autophosphorylation in the cytoplasmic domain of CusS and phosphotransfer between CusS and CusR. In vitro analyses show that CusS autophosphorylates its conserved H271 residue at the N1 position of the histidine imidazole. The phosphoryl group is removed by the response regulator CusR in a reaction that requires a conserved aspartate at position 51. Functional analyses in vivo of CusS and CusR variants with mutations in the autophosphorylation or phosphoacceptor residues suggest that the phosphotransfer event is essential for metal resistance in E. coli Biochemical analysis shows that the CusS dimer autophosphorylates using a cis mechanism. Our results support a signal transduction model in which rotation and bending movements in the cytoplasmic domain maintain the mode of autophosphorylation.

A Single-Domain Response Regulator Functions as an Integrating Hub To Coordinate General Stress Response and Development in Alphaproteobacteria

The alphaproteobacterial general stress response is governed by a conserved partner-switching mechanism that is triggered by phosphorylation of the response regulator PhyR. In the model organism Caulobacter crescentus, PhyR was proposed to be phosphorylated by the histidine kinase PhyK, but biochemical evidence in support of such a role of PhyK is missing. Here, we identify a single-domain response regulator, MrrA, that is essential for general stress response activation in C. crescentus We demonstrate that PhyK does not function as a kinase but accepts phosphoryl groups from MrrA and passes them on to PhyR, adopting the role of a histidine phosphotransferase. MrrA is phosphorylated by at least six histidine kinases that likely serve as stress sensors. MrrA also transfers phosphate to LovK, a histidine kinase involved in C. crescentus holdfast production and attachment, which also negatively regulates the general stress response. We show that LovK together with the response regulator LovR acts as a phosphate sink to redirect phosphate flux away from the PhyKR branch. In agreement with the biochemical data, an mrrA mutant is unable to activate the general stress response and shows a hyperattachment phenotype, which is linked to decreased expression of the major holdfast inhibitory protein HfiA. We propose that MrrA serves as a central phosphorylation hub that coordinates the general stress response with C. crescentus development and other adaptive behaviors. The characteristic bow-tie architecture of this phosphorylation network with MrrA as the central knot may expedite the evolvability and species-specific niche adaptation of this group of bacteria.IMPORTANCE Two-component systems (TCSs) consisting of a histidine kinase and a cognate response regulator are predominant signal transduction systems in bacteria. To avoid cross talk, TCSs are generally thought to be highly insulated from each other. However, this notion is based largely on studies of the HisKA subfamily of histidine kinases, while little information is available for the HWE and HisKA2 subfamilies. The latter have been implicated in the alphaproteobacterial general stress response. Here, we show that in the model organism Caulobacter crescentus an atypical FATGUY-type single-domain response regulator, MrrA, is highly promiscuous in accepting and transferring phosphoryl groups from and to multiple up- and downstream kinases, challenging the current view of strictly insulated TCSs. Instead, we propose that FATGUY response regulators have evolved in alphaproteobacteria as central phosphorylation hubs to broadly sample information and distribute phosphoryl groups between the general stress response pathway and other TCSs, thereby coordinating multiple cellular behaviors.

Regulation of signaling directionality revealed by 3D snapshots of a kinase:regulator complex in action

Two-component systems (TCS) are protein machineries that enable cells to respond to input signals. Histidine kinases (HK) are the sensory component, transferring information toward downstream response regulators (RR). HKs transfer phosphoryl groups to their specific RRs, but also dephosphorylate them, overall ensuring proper signaling. The mechanisms by which HKs discriminate between such disparate directions, are yet unknown. We now disclose crystal structures of the HK:RR complex DesK:DesR from Bacillus subtilis, comprising snapshots of the phosphotransfer and the dephosphorylation reactions. The HK dictates the reactional outcome through conformational rearrangements that include the reactive histidine. The phosphotransfer center is asymmetric, poised for dissociative nucleophilic substitution. The structural bases of HK phosphatase/phosphotransferase control are uncovered, and the unexpected discovery of a dissociative reactional center, sheds light on the evolution of TCS phosphotransfer reversibility. Our findings should be applicable to a broad range of signaling systems and instrumental in synthetic TCS rewiring.