Mutations that improve export of maltose-binding protein in SecB- cells of Escherichia coli

Efficient function of signal peptidase 1 of Escherichia coli is partly determined by residues in the mature N-terminus of exported proteins

Exported proteins require an N-terminal signal peptide to direct them from the cytoplasm to the periplasm. Once the protein has been translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane, the signal peptide is cleaved by a signal peptidase, allowing the remainder of the protein to fold into its mature state in the periplasm. Signal peptidase I (LepB) cleaves non-lipoproteins and recognises the sequence Ala-X-Ala. Amino acids present at the N-terminus of mature, exported proteins have been shown to affect the efficiency at which the protein is exported. Here we investigated a bias against aromatic amino acids at the second position in the mature protein (P2'). Maltose binding protein (MBP) was mutated to introduce aromatic amino acids (tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine) at P2'. All mutants with aromatic amino acids at P2' were exported less efficiently as indicated by a slight increase in precursor protein in vivo. Binding of LepB to peptides that encompass the MBP cleavage site were analysed using surface plasmon resonance. These studies showed peptides with an aromatic amino acid at P2' had a slower off rate, due to a significantly higher binding affinity for LepB. These data are consistent with the accumulation of small amounts of preMBP in purified protein samples. Hence, the reason for the lack of aromatic amino acids at P2' in E. coli is likely due to interference with efficient LepB activity. These data and previous bioinformatics strongly suggest that aromatic amino acids are not preferred at P2' and this should be incorporated into signal peptide prediction algorithms.

The rate of folding dictates substrate secretion by the Escherichia coli hemolysin type 1 secretion system

Secretion of the Escherichia coli toxin hemolysin A (HlyA) is catalyzed by the membrane protein complex HlyB-HlyD-TolC and requires a secretion sequence located within the last 60 amino acids of HlyA. The Hly translocator complex exports a variety of passenger proteins when fused N-terminal to this secretion sequence. However, not all fusions are secreted efficiently. Here, we demonstrate that the maltose binding protein (MalE) lacking its natural export signal and fused to the HlyA secretion signal is poorly secreted by the Hly system. We anticipated that folding kinetics might be limiting secretion, and we therefore introduced the "folding" mutation Y283D. Indeed this mutant fusion protein was secreted at a much higher level. This level was further enhanced by the introduction of a second MalE folding mutation (V8G or A276G). Secretion did not require the molecular chaperone SecB. Folding analysis revealed that all mutations reduced the refolding rate of the substrate, whereas the unfolding rate was unaffected. Thus, the efficiency of secretion by the Hly system is dictated by the folding rate of the substrate. Moreover, we demonstrate that fusion proteins defective in export can be engineered for secretion while still retaining function.

Folding in vitro and transport in vivo of pre-β-lactamase are SecB independent

The rate of folding of the precursor of β-lactamase is not influenced by the presence of SecB under conditions in which GroEL/ES retards the folding. Wild-type β-lactamase and several mutants in the signal or the mature protein, affecting either transport or enzyme kinetics and probably folding, were examined for total expression, total enzymatic activity, and transported β-lactamase (in vivo resistance) in secB^- and secB⁺ strains. We conclude that there is no indication of any relevant interaction between SecB and pre-β-lactamase in vitro, nor did the secB^- mutation affect the transport of wild-type β-lactamase or any of the mutants in vivo. Thus, putative Escherichia coli'folding modulators'must be of limited specificity.

Basic amino acids in a distinct subset of signal peptides promote interaction with the signal recognition particle

Previous studies have demonstrated that signal peptides bind to the signal recognition particle (SRP) primarily via hydrophobic interactions with the 54-kDa protein subunit. The crystal structure of the conserved SRP ribonucleoprotein core, however, raised the surprising possibility that electrostatic interactions between basic amino acids in signal peptides and the phosphate backbone of SRP RNA may also play a role in signal sequence recognition. To test this possibility we examined the degree to which basic amino acids in a signal peptide influence the targeting of two Escherichia coli proteins, maltose binding protein and OmpA. Whereas both proteins are normally targeted to the inner membrane by SecB, we found that replacement of their native signal peptides with another moderately hydrophobic but unusually basic signal peptide (DeltaEspP) rerouted them into the SRP pathway. Reduction in either the net positive charge or the hydrophobicity of the DeltaEspP signal peptide decreased the effectiveness of SRP recognition. A high degree of hydrophobicity, however, compensated for the loss of basic residues and restored SRP binding. Taken together, the data suggest that the formation of salt bridges between SRP RNA and basic amino acids facilitates the binding of a distinct subset of signal peptides whose hydrophobicity falls slightly below a threshold level.

Antifolding activity of the SecB chaperone is essential for secretion of HasA, a quickly folding ABC pathway substrate

We have previously shown that SecB, the ATP-independent chaperone of the Sec pathway, is required for the secretion of the HasA hemophore from Serratia marcescens via its type I secretion pathway, both in the reconstituted system in Escherichia coli and in the original host. The refolding of apo-HasA after denaturation with guanidine HCl was followed by stopped-flow measurements of fluorescence of its single tryptophan, both in the absence and presence of SecB. In the absence of SecB, HasA folds very quickly with one main phase (45 s(-1)) accounting for 92% of the signal. SecB considerably slows down HasA folding. At stoichiometric amounts of SecB and HasA, a single phase (0.014 s(-1)) of refolding is observed. Two double point mutants of HasA were made, abolishing two hydrogen bonds between N-terminal and C-terminal side chain residues. In both cases, the mutants essentially maintained the same secondary and tertiary structure as wild-type HasA and were fully functional. Refolding of both mutants was much slower than that of wild-type HasA and they were secreted essentially independently of SecB. We conclude that SecB has mainly an antifolding function in the HasA ABC secretion pathway.

The DsbA signal sequence directs efficient, cotranslational export of passenger proteins to the Escherichia coli periplasm via the signal recognition particle pathway

The Escherichia coli cytoplasmic protein thioredoxin 1 can be efficiently exported to the periplasmic space by the signal sequence of the DsbA protein (DsbAss) but not by the signal sequence of alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) or maltose binding protein (MBP). Using mutations of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway, we found that DsbAss directs thioredoxin 1 to the SRP export pathway. When DsbAss is fused to MBP, MBP also is directed to the SRP pathway. We show directly that the DsbAss-promoted export of MBP is largely cotranslational, in contrast to the mode of MBP export when the native signal sequence is utilized. However, both the export of thioredoxin 1 by DsbAss and the export of DsbA itself are quite sensitive to even the slight inhibition of SecA. These results suggest that SecA may be essential for both the slow posttranslational pathway and the SRP-dependent cotranslational pathway. Finally, probably because of its rapid folding in the cytoplasm, thioredoxin provides, along with gene fusion approaches, a sensitive assay system for signal sequences that utilize the SRP pathway.

Influence of tat mutations on the ribose-binding protein translocation in Escherichia coli

Proteins are exported across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane either as unfolded precursors via the Sec machinery or in folded conformation via the Tat system. The ribose-binding protein (RBP) of Escherichia coli is a Sec-pathway substrate. Intriguingly, it exhibits fast folding kinetics and its export is independent of SecB, a general chaperone protein dedicated for protein secretion. In this study, we found that the quantity of RBP was significantly reduced in the periplasm of tat mutants, which was restored by in trans expression of the tatABC genes. Pulse-chase experiments showed that significant amount of wild-type RBP was processed in a secY mutant in the presence of azide (SecA inhibitor), whereas the processing of a slow folding RBP derivative was almost completely blocked under the same conditions. These results would suggest that under the Sec-defective conditions the export of a portion of folded RBP could be rescued by the Tat system.

Evidence that SecB enhances the activity of SecA

In Escherichia coli, SecA is a critical component of the protein transport machinery which powers the translocation process by hydrolyzing ATP and recognizing signal peptides which are the earmark of secretory proteins. In contrast, SecB is utilized by only a subset of preproteins to prevent their premature folding and chaperone them to membrane-bound SecA. Using purified components and synthetic signal peptides, we have studied the interaction of SecB with SecA and with SecA-signal peptide complexes in vitro. Using a chemical cross-linking approach, we find that the formation of SecA-SecB complexes is accompanied by a decrease in the level of cross-linking of SecA dimers, suggesting that SecB induces a conformational change in SecA. Furthermore, functional signal peptides, but not dysfunctional ones, promote the formation of SecA-SecB complexes. SecB is also shown to directly enhance the ATPase activity of SecA in a concentration-dependent and saturable manner. To determine the biological consequence of this finding, the influence of SecB on the signal peptide-stimulated SecA/lipid ATPase was studied using synthetic peptides of varying hydrophobicity. Interestingly, the presence of SecB can sufficiently boost the response of signal peptides with moderate hydrophobicity such that it is comparable to the activity generated by a more hydrophobic peptide in the absence of SecB. The results suggest that SecB directly enhances the activity of SecA and provide a biochemical basis for the enhanced transport efficiency of preproteins in the presence of SecB in vivo.

The targeting pathway of Escherichia coli presecretory and integral membrane proteins is specified by the hydrophobicity of the targeting signal

Previous studies have demonstrated that presecretory proteins such as maltose binding protein (MBP) and outer membrane protein A (OmpA) are targeted to the Escherichia coli inner membrane by the molecular chaperone SecB, but that integral membrane proteins are targeted by the signal recognition particle (SRP). In vitro studies have suggested that trigger factor binds to a sequence near the N terminus of the mature region of OmpA and shunts the protein into the SecB pathway by blocking an interaction between SRP and the signal peptide. By contrast, we have found that the targeting pathway of a protein under physiological conditions is dictated by the composition of its targeting signal. Replacement of the MBP or OmpA signal peptide with the first transmembrane segment of AcrB abolished the dependence on SecB for transport and rerouted both proteins into the SRP targeting pathway. More modest alterations of the MBP signal peptide that simply increase its hydrophobicity also promoted SRP binding. Furthermore, we obtained evidence that SRP has a low affinity for typical signal peptides in vivo. These results imply that different classes of E. coli proteins are targeted by distinct pathways because bacterial SRP binds to a more restricted range of targeting signals than its eukaryotic counterpart.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

Identification of a sequence motif that confers SecB dependence on a SecB-independent secretory protein in vivo

SecB is a cytosolic chaperone which facilitates the transport of a subset of proteins, including membrane proteins such as PhoE and LamB and some periplasmic proteins such as maltose-binding protein, in Escherichia coli. However, not all proteins require SecB for transport, and proteins such as ribose-binding protein are exported efficiently even in SecB-null strains. The characteristics which confer SecB dependence on some proteins but not others have not been defined. To determine the sequence characteristics that are responsible for the SecB requirement, we have inserted a systematic series of short, polymeric sequences into the SecB-independent protein alkaline phosphatase (PhoA). The extent to which these simple sequences convert alkaline phosphatase into a SecB-requiring protein was evaluated in vivo. Using this approach we have examined the roles of the polarity and charge of the sequence, as well as its location within the mature region, in conferring SecB dependence. We find that an insert with as few as 10 residues, of which 3 are basic, confers SecB dependence and that the mutant protein is efficiently exported in the presence of SecB. Remarkably, the basic motifs caused the protein to be translocated in a strict membrane potential-dependent fashion, indicating that the membrane potential is not a barrier to, but rather a requirement for, translocation of the motif. The alkaline phosphatase mutants most sensitive to the loss of SecB are those most sensitive to inhibition of SecA via azide treatment, consistent with the necessity for formation of a preprotein-SecB-SecA complex. Furthermore, the impact of the basic motif depends on location within the mature protein and parallels the accessibility of the location to the secretion apparatus.

The E. coli SRP: preferences of a targeting factor

Research on the targeting of proteins to the cytoplasmic membrane of E. coli has mainly focused on the so-called 'general secretory pathway' (GSP) which involves the Sec-proteins. Recently, evidence has been obtained for an alternative targeting pathway in E. coli which involves the signal recognition particle (SRP). The constituents of this SRP pathway in E. coli are homologous to those of the well-characterized eukaryotic SRP pathway, which is the main targeting pathway for both proteins translocated across and inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. However, until recently, no clear function could be assigned to the SRP in E. coli. New studies point to an important role of the E. coli SRP in the assembly of inner membrane proteins.

Expression of Escherichia coli SecB in Bacillus subtilis facilitates secretion of the SecB-dependent maltose-binding protein of E. coli

Less than 20% of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) synthesized in Bacillus subtilis is exported. However, a portion of the secreted MBP was processed cotranslationally. Coexpression of SecB, a secretion-related chaperone of E. coli, stimulated posttranslational export of MBP in B. subtilis but inhibited its cotranslational processing. Export of a SecB-independent MBP-ribose-binding protein hybrid precursor was not enhanced by SecB. A slowly folding MBP derivative (MBP-Y283D) was more efficiently secreted than wild-type MBP, suggesting that the antifolding activity of SecB promotes posttranslational secretion of MBP in B. subtilis.

Escherichia coli signal peptides direct inefficient secretion of an outer membrane protein (OmpA) and periplasmic proteins (maltose-binding protein, ribose-binding protein, and alkaline phosphatase) in Bacillus subtilis

Signal peptides of gram-positive exoproteins generally carry a higher net positive charge at their amino termini (N regions) and have longer hydrophobic cores (h regions) and carboxy termini (C regions) than do signal peptides of Escherichia coli envelope proteins. To determine if these differences are functionally significant, the ability of Bacillus subtilis to secrete four different E. coli envelope proteins was tested. A pulse-chase analysis demonstrated that the periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP), ribose-binding protein (RBP), alkaline phosphatase (PhoA), and outer membrane protein OmpA were only inefficiently secreted. Inefficient secretion could be ascribed largely to properties of the homologous signal peptides, since replacing them with the B. amyloliquefaciens alkaline protease signal peptide resulted in significant increases in both the rate and extent of export. The relative efficiency with which the native precursors were secreted (OmpA >> RBP > MBP > PhoA) was most closely correlated with the overall hydrophobicity of their h regions. This correlation was strengthened by the observation that the B. amyloliquefaciens levansucrase signal peptide, whose h region has an overall hydrophobicity similar to that of E. coli signal peptides, was able to direct secretion of only modest levels of MBP and OmpA. These results imply that there are differences between the secretion machineries of B. subtilis and E. coli and demonstrate that the outer membrane protein OmpA can be translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane of B. subtilis.

Regions of maltose-binding protein that influence SecB-dependent and SecA-dependent export in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, the efficient export of maltose-binding protein (MBP) is dependent on the chaperone SecB, whereas export of ribose-binding protein (RBP) is SecB independent. To localize the regions of MBP involved in interaction with SecB, hybrids between MBP and RBP in SecB mutant cells were constructed and analyzed. One hybrid consisted of the signal peptide and first third of the mature moiety of MBP, followed by the C-terminal two-thirds of RBP (MBP-RBP112). This hybrid was dependent upon SecB for its efficient export and exhibited a strong export defect in secA mutant cells. A hybrid between RBP and MBP with the same fusion point was also constructed (RBP-MBP116). The RBP-MBP116 hybrid remained SecB independent and only exhibited a partial export defect in secA mutant cells. In addition, MBP species with specific alterations in the early mature region were less dependent on SecB for their efficient export. The export of these altered MBP species was also less affected in secA mutant cells and in cells treated with sodium azide. These results present additional evidence for the targeting role of SecB.

prlA suppression of defective export of maltose-binding protein in secB mutants of Escherichia coli

An Escherichia coli strain containing a signal sequence mutation in the periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP) (malE18-1) and a point mutation in the soluble export factor SecB (secBL75Q) is completely defective in export of MBP and unable to grow on maltose (Mal- phenotype). We isolated 95 spontaneous Mal+ revertants and characterized them genetically. Three types of extragenic suppressors were identified: informational (missense) suppressors, a bypass suppressor conferring the Mal+ phenotype in the absence of MBP, and suppressors affecting the prlA gene, which encodes a component of the protein export apparatus. In this study, a novel prlA allele, designated prlA1001 and mapping in the putative second transmembrane domain of the PrlA (SecY) protein, was found. In addition, we isolated a mutation designated prlA1024 which is identical to prlA4-2, the mutation responsible for the signal sequence suppression in the prlA4 (prlA4-1 prlA4-2) double mutant (T. Sako and T. Iino, J. Bacteriol. 170:5389-5391, 1988). Comparison of the prlA1024 mutant and the prlA4 double mutant provides a possible explanation for the isolation of these prlA alleles.

The Cs sec mutants of Escherichia coli reflect the cold sensitivity of protein export itself

We have found that temperature can have a striking effect upon protein export in Escherichia coli, suggesting that there is a cold-sensitive step in the protein export pathway. Cs mutations comprise the largest class of mutations affecting the membrane-localized Sec proteins SecD, SecE, SecF and SecY. Although some of these mutations could encode cold-labile proteins, this is unlikely to account for the Cs phenotype of most export mutants, as mutations which simply produce lower amounts of SecE protein have the same phenotype. Certain signal sequence mutations affecting maltose binding protein are also cold sensitive for export. These effects appear to arise by a specific interaction of cold with certain export defects. We believe that the Cs sec mutations are representative of a large class of conditional lethal mutations, whose conditional phenotype reflects an underlying thermal sensitivity of the process in which they are involved.

The complete general secretory pathway in gram-negative bacteria

The unifying feature of all proteins that are transported out of the cytoplasm of gram-negative bacteria by the general secretory pathway (GSP) is the presence of a long stretch of predominantly hydrophobic amino acids, the signal sequence. The interaction between signal sequence-bearing proteins and the cytoplasmic membrane may be a spontaneous event driven by the electrochemical energy potential across the cytoplasmic membrane, leading to membrane integration. The translocation of large, hydrophilic polypeptide segments to the periplasmic side of this membrane almost always requires at least six different proteins encoded by the sec genes and is dependent on both ATP hydrolysis and the electrochemical energy potential. Signal peptidases process precursors with a single, amino-terminal signal sequence, allowing them to be released into the periplasm, where they may remain or whence they may be inserted into the outer membrane. Selected proteins may also be transported across this membrane for assembly into cell surface appendages or for release into the extracellular medium. Many bacteria secrete a variety of structurally different proteins by a common pathway, referred to here as the main terminal branch of the GSP. This recently discovered branch pathway comprises at least 14 gene products. Other, simpler terminal branches of the GSP are also used by gram-negative bacteria to secrete a more limited range of extracellular proteins.

Inter-molecular degradation of signal peptidase I in vitro

Highly purified preparations of signal peptidase I (36 kDa) were found to undergo an apparent inter-autocatalytic degradation at 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C. The disappearance of the 36 kDa protein coincided with the stable appearance of a 31 kDa and a 5 kDa species. Amino-terminal sequencing of the 31 kDa product indicated a site specific cleavage following Ala38-Gln-Ala of signal peptidase I. The 31 kDa fragment was purified and shown to have 100-fold less activity than the native enzyme, with pre-maltose binding protein as a substrate.

Secretion of active truncated CD4 into Escherichia coli periplasm

A truncated molecule containing the first 183 amino acid residues of the HIV-1 receptor, CD4, was made by periplasmic secretion in Escherichia coli. The signal sequence from the E. coli proteins OmpA, PhoA, or OmpF was fused to the truncated CD4, under the control of either the trp or the lac promoter. The processed material secreted into the periplasm reacted with monoclonal antibodies and exhibited binding activity to the HIV-1 envelope protein gp120. Not all of the processed product was recovered in the periplasm by osmotic shock, suggesting that either the material aggregated in the periplasm or, during secretion, the molecule assumed some transient conformation that interfered with its translocation across the inner membrane. A mutation in prlA (a gene involved in secretion) increased the level of processing, suggesting that secretion of a heterologous protein in E. coli can be optimized by manipulating the host secretion apparatus.

SecB-independent export of Escherichia coli ribose-binding protein (RBP): some comparisons with export of maltose-binding protein (MBP) and studies with RBP-MBP hybrid proteins

The efficient export of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) is known to be SecB dependent, whereas ribose-binding protein (RBP) export is SecB independent. When the MBP and RBP signal peptides were exchanged precisely at the signal peptidase processing sites, the resultant RBP-MBP and MBP-RBP hybrid proteins both were efficiently exported in SecB+ cells. However, only MBP-RBP was efficiently exported in SecB- cells; RBP-MBP exhibited a significant export defect, a finding that was consistent with previous proposals that SecB specifically interacts with the mature moiety of precursor MBP to promote export. The relatively slow, totally posttranslational export mode exhibited by certain mutant RBP and MBP-RBP species in SecB+ cells was not affected by the loss of SecB. In contrast, MBP and RBP-MBP species with similarly altered signal peptides were totally export defective in SecB- cells. Both export-defective MBP and RBP-MBP interfered with SecB-mediated protein export by depleting cells of functional SecB. In contrast, neither export-defective RBP nor MBP-RBP elicited such an interference effect. These and other data indicated that SecB is unable to interact with precursor RBP or that any interaction between these two proteins is considerably weaker than that of SecB with precursor MBP. In addition, no correlation could be established between a SecB requirement for export and PrlA-mediated suppression of signal peptide export defects. Finally, previous studies have established that wild-type MBP export can be accomplished cotranslationally, whereas wild-type RBP export is strictly a posttranslational process. In this study, cotranslational export was not detected for either MBP-RBP or RBP-MBP. This indicates that the export mode exhibited by a given precursor protein (cotranslational versus posttranslational) is determined by properties of both the signal peptide and the mature moiety.

Signal peptide mutants of Escherichia coli

Numerous secretory proteins of the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli are synthesized as precursor proteins which require an amino terminal extension known as the signal peptide for translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane. Following translocation, the signal peptide is proteolytically cleaved from the precursor to produce the mature exported protein. Signal peptides do not exhibit sequence homology, but invariably share common structural features: (1) The basic amino acid residues positioned at the amino terminus of the signal peptide are probably involved in precursor protein binding to the cytoplasmic membrane surface. (2) A stretch of 10 to 15 nonpolar amino acid residues form a hydrophobic core in the signal peptide which can insert into the lipid bilayer. (3) Small residues capable of beta-turn formation are located at the cleavage site in the carboxyl terminus of the signal peptide. (4) Charge characteristics of the amino terminal region of the mature protein can also influence precursor protein export. A variety of mutations in each of the structurally distinct regions of the signal peptide have been constructed via site-directed mutagenesis or isolated through genetic selection. These mutants have shed considerable light on the structure and function of the signal peptide and are reviewed here.

Signal peptidases and signal peptide hydrolases

Signal peptidases, the endoproteases that remove the amino-terminal signal sequence from many secretory proteins, have been isolated from various sources. Seven signal peptidases have been purified, two from E. coli, two from mammalian sources, and three from mitochondrial matrix. The mitochondrial enzymes are soluble and function as a heterogeneous dimer. The mammalian enzymes are isolated as a complex and share a common glycosylated subunit. The bacterial enzymes are isolated as monomers and show no sequence homology with each other or the mammalian enzymes. The membrane-bound enzymes seem to require a substrate containing a consensus sequence following the -3, -1 rule of von Heijne at the cleavage site; however, processing of the substrate is strongly influenced by the hydrophobic region of the signal peptide. The enzymes appear to recognize an unknown three-dimensional motif rather than a specific amino acid sequence around the cleavage site. The matrix mitochondrial enzymes are metallo-endopeptidases; however, the other signal peptidases may belong to a unique class of proteases as they are resistant to chelators and most protease inhibitors. There are no data concerning the substrate binding site of these enzymes. In vivo, the signal peptide is rapidly degraded. Three different enzymes in Escherichia coli that can degrade a signal peptide in vitro have been identified. The intact signal peptide is not accumulated in mutants lacking these enzymes, which suggests that these peptidases individually are not responsible for the degradation of an intact signal peptide in vivo. It is speculated that signal peptidases and signal peptide hydrolases are integral components of the secretory pathway and that inhibition of the terminal steps can block translocation.

Export of the periplasmic maltose-binding protein of Escherichia coli

The export of the maltose-binding protein (MBP), the malE gene product, to the periplasm of Escherichia coli cells has been extensively investigated. The isolation of strains synthesizing MalE-LacZ hybrid proteins led to a novel genetic selection for mutants that accumulate export-defective precursor MBP (preMBP) in the cytoplasm. The export defects were subsequently shown to result from alterations in the MBP signal peptide. Analysis of these and a variety of mutants obtained in other ways has provided considerable insight into the requirements for an optimally functional MBP signal peptide. This structure has been shown to have multiple roles in the export process, including promoting entry of preMBP into the export pathway and initiating MBP translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane. The latter has been shown to be a late event relative to synthesis and can occur entirely posttranslationally, even many minutes after the completion of synthesis. Translocation requires that the MBP polypeptide exist in an export-competent conformation that most likely represents an unfolded state that is not inhibitory to membrane transit. The signal peptide contributes to the export competence of preMBP by slowing the rate at which the attached mature moiety folds. In addition, preMBP folding is thought to be further retarded by the binding of a cytoplasmic protein, SecB, to the mature moiety of nascent preMBP. In cells lacking this antifolding factor, MBP export represents a race between delivery of newly synthesized, export-competent preMBP to the translocation machinery in the cytoplasmic membrane and folding of preMBP into an export-incompetent conformation. SecB is one of three E. coli proteins classified as "molecular chaperones" by their ability to stabilize precursor proteins for membrane translocation.

The folding properties of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein influence its interaction with SecB in vitro

It has been proposed that the cytoplasmic SecB protein functions as a component of the Escherichia coli protein export machinery by serving as an antifolding factor that retards folding of the precursor maltose-binding protein (preMBP) into a translocation-incompetent form. In this study, it was found that SecB directly interacts with wild-type preMBP and various mutationally altered MBP species synthesized in vitro to form a SecB-MBP complex that can be precipitated with anti-SecB serum. The association of SecB with wild-type preMBP was relatively unstable; such a complex was formed only when SecB was present cotranslationally or after denaturation of previously synthesized preMBP and was detected with only low efficiency. In marked contrast, MBP species that were defective in the ability to assume the stable conformation of wild-type preMBP or that exhibited significantly slower folding kinetics formed much more stable complexes with SecB. In one case, we demonstrated that SecB did not need to be present cotranslationally for complex formation to occur. Formation of a complex between SecB and MBP was clearly not dependent on the MBP signal peptide. However, we were unable to detect complex formation between SecB and MBP lacking virtually the entire signal peptide but having a completely intact mature moiety. This MBP species folded at a rate considerably faster than that of wild-type preMBP. The propensity of this mutant protein to assume the native conformation of mature MBP apparently precludes a stable association with SecB, whereas an MBP species lacking a signal peptide but exhibiting altered folding properties did form a complex with SecB that could be precipitated with anti-SecB serum.

The role of the mature part of secretory proteins in translocation across the plasma membrane and in regulation of their synthesis in Escherichia coli

Presently available data are reviewed which concern the role of the mature parts of secretory precursor proteins in translocation across the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli. The following conclusions can be drawn; i) signals, acting in a positive fashion and required for translocation do not appear to exist in the mature polypeptides; ii) a number of features have been identified which either affect the efficiency of translocation or cause export incompatibility. These are: alpha) protein folding prior to translocation; beta) restrictions regarding the structure of N-terminus; gamma) presence of lipophilic anchors; delta) too low a size of the precursor. Efficiency of translocation is also enhanced by binding of chaperonins (SecB, trigger factor, GroEL) to precursors. Binding sites for chaperonins appear to exist within the mature parts of the precursors but the nature of these sites has remained rather mysterious. Mutant periplasmic proteins with a block in release from the plasma membrane have been described, the mechanism of this block is not known. The mature parts of secretory proteins can also be involved in the regulation of their synthesis. It appears that exported proteins are already recognized as such before they are channelled into the export pathway and that their synthesis can be feed-back inhibited at the translational level.