The lrp gene product regulates expression of lysU in Escherichia coli K-12

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymes globally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation. Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g., in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show huge structural plasticity related to function and limited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even species specific (e.g., the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS). Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably between distant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria. The review focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation, and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulated in last two decades is reviewed, showing how the field moved from essentially reductionist biology towards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRS paralogs (e.g., during cell wall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointed throughout the review and distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymesglobally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation.Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g.,in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show hugestructural plasticity related to function andlimited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even speciesspecific (e.g.,the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS).Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably betweendistant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria.Thereview focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation,and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulatedin last two decades is reviewed,showing how thefield moved from essentially reductionist biologytowards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRSparalogs (e.g., during cellwall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointedthroughout the reviewand distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

Limited functional conservation of a global regulator among related bacterial genera: Lrp in Escherichia, Proteus and Vibrio

Background

Bacterial genome sequences are being determined rapidly, but few species are physiologically well characterized. Predicting regulation from genome sequences usually involves extrapolation from better-studied bacteria, using the hypothesis that a conserved regulator, conserved target gene, and predicted regulator-binding site in the target promoter imply conserved regulation between the two species. However many compared organisms are ecologically and physiologically diverse, and the limits of extrapolation have not been well tested. In E. coli K-12 the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) affects expression of ~400 genes. Proteus mirabilis and Vibrio cholerae have highly-conserved lrp orthologs (98% and 92% identity to E. coli lrp). The functional equivalence of Lrp from these related species was assessed.

Results

Heterologous Lrp regulated gltB, livK and lrp transcriptional fusions in an E. coli background in the same general way as the native Lrp, though with significant differences in extent. Microarray analysis of these strains revealed that the heterologous Lrp proteins significantly influence only about half of the genes affected by native Lrp. In P. mirabilis, heterologous Lrp restored swarming, though with some pattern differences. P. mirabilis produced substantially more Lrp than E. coli or V. cholerae under some conditions. Lrp regulation of target gene orthologs differed among the three native hosts. Strikingly, while Lrp negatively regulates its own gene in E. coli, and was shown to do so even more strongly in P. mirabilis, Lrp appears to activate its own gene in V. cholerae.

Conclusion

The overall similarity of regulatory effects of the Lrp orthologs supports the use of extrapolation between related strains for general purposes. However this study also revealed intrinsic differences even between orthologous regulators sharing >90% overall identity, and 100% identity for the DNA-binding helix-turn-helix motif, as well as differences in the amounts of those regulators. These results suggest that predicting regulation of specific target genes based on genome sequence comparisons alone should be done on a conservative basis.

The Escherichia coli proteome: past, present, and future prospects

Proteomics has emerged as an indispensable methodology for large-scale protein analysis in functional genomics. The Escherichia coli proteome has been extensively studied and is well defined in terms of biochemical, biological, and biotechnological data. Even before the entire E. coli proteome was fully elucidated, the largest available data set had been integrated to decipher regulatory circuits and metabolic pathways, providing valuable insights into global cellular physiology and the development of metabolic and cellular engineering strategies. With the recent advent of advanced proteomic technologies, the E. coli proteome has been used for the validation of new technologies and methodologies such as sample prefractionation, protein enrichment, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, protein detection, mass spectrometry (MS), combinatorial assays with n-dimensional chromatographies and MS, and image analysis software. These important technologies will not only provide a great amount of additional information on the E. coli proteome but also synergistically contribute to other proteomic studies. Here, we review the past development and current status of E. coli proteome research in terms of its biological, biotechnological, and methodological significance and suggest future prospects.

Feast/famine regulatory proteins (FFRPs): Escherichia coli Lrp, AsnC and related archaeal transcription factors

Feast/famine regulatory proteins comprise a diverse family of transcription factors, which have been referred to in various individual identifications, including Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein and asparagine synthase C gene product. A full length feast/famine regulatory protein consists of the N-terminal DNA-binding domain and the C-domain, which is involved in dimerization and further assembly, thereby producing, for example, a disc or a chromatin-like cylinder. Various ligands of the size of amino acids bind at the interface between feast/famine regulatory protein dimers, thereby altering their assembly forms. Also, the combination of feast/famine regulatory protein subunits forming the same assembly is altered. In this way, a small number of feast/famine regulatory proteins are able to regulate a large number of genes in response to various environmental changes. Because feast/famine regulatory proteins are shared by archaea and eubacteria, the genome-wide regulation by feast/famine regulatory proteins is traceable back to their common ancestor, being the prototype of highly differentiated transcription regulatory mechanisms found in organisms nowadays.

Modulation of the sensitivity of FimB recombination to branched-chain amino acids and alanine in Escherichia coli K-12

Phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli requires the site-specific recombination of a short invertible element. Inversion is catalyzed by FimB (switching in either direction) or FimE (inversion mainly from on to off) and is influenced by auxiliary factors integration host factor (IHF) and leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). These proteins bind to sites (IHF site II and Lrp sites 1 and 2) within the invertible element to stimulate recombination, presumably by bending the DNA to enhance synapses. Interaction of Lrp with a third site (site 3) cooperatively with sites 1 and 2 (termed complex 1) impedes recombination. Inversion is stimulated by the branched-chain amino acids (particularly leucine) and alanine, and according to a current model, the amino acids promote the selective loss of Lrp from site 3 (complex 2). Here we show that the central portion of the fim invertible element, situated between Lrp site 3 and IHF site II, is dispensable for FimB recombination but that this region is also required for full amino acid stimulation of inversion. Further work reveals that the region is likely to contain multiple regulatory elements. Lrp site 3 is shown to bind the regulatory protein with low affinity, and a mutation that enhances binding to this element is found both to diminish the stimulatory effects of IVLA on FimB recombination and to inhibit recombination in the absence of the amino acids. The results obtained emphasize the importance of Lrp site 3 as a control element but also highlight the complexity of the regulatory system that affects this site.

Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli

Nitrogen limitation in Escherichia coli controls the expression of about 100 genes of the nitrogen regulated (Ntr) response, including the ammonia-assimilating glutamine synthetase. Low intracellular glutamine controls the Ntr response through several regulators, whose activities are modulated by a variety of metabolites. Ntr proteins assimilate ammonia, scavenge nitrogen-containing compounds, and appear to integrate ammonia assimilation with other aspects of metabolism, such as polyamine metabolism and glutamate synthesis. The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) controls the synthesis of glutamate synthase, which controls the Ntr response, presumably through its effect on intracellular glutamine. Some Ntr proteins inhibit the expression of some Lrp-activated genes. Guanosine tetraphosphate appears to control Lrp synthesis. In summary, a network of interacting global regulators that senses different aspects of metabolism integrates nitrogen assimilation with other metabolic processes.

Escherichia coli?a model system that benefits from and contributes to the evolution of proteomics

The large body of knowledge about Escherichia coli makes it a useful model organism for the expression of heterologous proteins. Proteomic studies have helped to elucidate the complex cellular responses of E. coli and facilitated its use in a variety of biotechnology applications. Knowledge of basic cellular processes provides the means for better control of heterologous protein expression. Beyond such important applications, E. coli is an ideal organism for testing new analytical technologies because of the extensive knowledge base available about the organism. For example, improved technology for characterization of unknown proteins using mass spectrometry has made two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) studies more useful and more rewarding, and much of the initial testing of novel protocols is based on well-studied samples derived from E. coli. These techniques have facilitated the construction of more accurate 2DE maps. In this review, we present work that led to the 2DE databases, including a new map based on tandem time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS); describe cellular responses relevant to biotechnology applications; and discuss some emerging proteomic techniques.

Global gene expression profiling in Escherichia coli K12. The effects of oxygen availability and FNR

The work presented here is a first step toward a long term goal of systems biology, the complete elucidation of the gene regulatory networks of a living organism. To this end, we have employed DNA microarray technology to identify genes involved in the regulatory networks that facilitate the transition of Escherichia coli cells from an aerobic to an anaerobic growth state. We also report the identification of a subset of these genes that are regulated by a global regulatory protein for anaerobic metabolism, FNR. Analysis of these data demonstrated that the expression of over one-third of the genes expressed during growth under aerobic conditions are altered when E. coli cells transition to an anaerobic growth state, and that the expression of 712 (49%) of these genes are either directly or indirectly modulated by FNR. The results presented here also suggest interactions between the FNR and the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) regulatory networks. Because computational methods to analyze and interpret high dimensional DNA microarray data are still at an early stage, and because basic issues of data analysis are still being sorted out, much of the emphasis of this work is directed toward the development of methods to identify differentially expressed genes with a high level of confidence. In particular, we describe an approach for identifying gene expression patterns (clusters) obtained from multiple perturbation experiments based on a subset of genes that exhibit high probability for differential expression values.

The Lrp family of transcriptional regulators

Genome analysis has revealed that members of the Lrp family of transcriptional regulators are widely distributed among prokaryotes, both bacteria and archaea. The archetype Leucine-responsive Regulatory Protein from Escherichia coli is a global regulator involved in modulating a variety of metabolic functions, including the catabolism and anabolism of amino acids as well as pili synthesis. Most Lrp homologues, however, appear to act as specific regulators of amino acid metabolism-related genes. Like most prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, Lrp-like regulators consist of a DNA-binding domain and a ligand-binding domain. The crystal structure of the Pyrococcus furiosus LrpA revealed an N-terminal domain with a common helix-turn-helix fold, and a C-terminal domain with a typical alphabeta-sandwich fold. The latter regulatory domain constitutes a novel ligand-binding site and has been designated RAM. Database analysis reveals that the RAM domain is present in many prokaryotic genomes, potentially encoding (1) Lrp-homologues, when fused to a DNA-binding domain (2) enzymes, when fused as a potential regulatory domain to a catalytic domain, and (3) stand-alone RAM modules with unknown function. The architecture of Lrp regulators with two distinct domains that harbour the regulatory (effector-binding) site and the active (DNA-binding) site, and their separation by a flexible hinge region, suggests a general allosteric switch of Lrp-like regulators.

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein-mediated repression of clp (encoding CS31A) expression by L-leucine and L-alanine in Escherichia coli

CS31A produced by septicemic and diarrheic Escherichia coli belongs to the Pap-regulatory family of adhesive factors, which are under methylation-dependent transcriptional regulation. Common features of operons encoding members of this family include two conserved GATC sites in the upstream regulatory region, and transcriptional regulators homologue to the PapB and PapI proteins. Methylation protection of GATC sites was previously shown to be dependent on the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Lrp and ClpB, the PapB equivalent, repressed clp basal transcription. A PapI homologue (AfaF) was required together with Lrp to establish the phase variation control, which gave rise to phase-ON cells that expressed CS31A and phase-OFF cells that did not express CS31A. In phase-OFF cells, the GATC(dist) site was methylated and the GATC(prox) site was protected from methylation, whereas in phase-ON cells, the inverse situation was found. Unlike Pap fimbriae, CS31A synthesis was dramatically reduced in media containing L-alanine or L-leucine. L-Alanine prevented the OFF-to-ON switch, locking clp expression in the OFF phase, whereas L-leucine repressed transcription without obvious effect on the switch frequency of phase variation. In phase-variable cells, leucine and alanine promoted methylation of GATC(dist) and methylation protection of GATC(prox), increasing the methylation pattern characteristic of repressed cells. Furthermore, alanine prevented the AfaF-dependent methylation protection of GATC(dist) and thus the appearance of phase-ON cells. In addition, analysis of clp expression in a Lrp-negative background indicated that alanine and leucine also repressed clp transcription by a methylation-independent mechanism.

Adaptation to famine: a family of stationary-phase genes revealed by microarray analysis

Bacterial adaptation to nutrient limitation and increased population densities is central to survival and virulence. Surprisingly, <3% of Escherichia coli genes are known to play roles specific to the stationary phase. There is evidence that the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) may play an important role in stationary phase, so this study used microarrays representing >98% of E. coli genes to more comprehensively identify those controlled by Lrp. The primary analysis compared isogenic Lrp(+) and Lrp(-) strains in cells growing in steady state in glucose minimal medium, either in the presence or absence of leucine. More than 400 genes were significantly Lrp-responsive under the conditions used. Transcription of 147 genes was lower in Lrp(+) than in Lrp(-) cells whether or not leucine was present; most of these genes were tightly coregulated under several conditions, including a burst of synthesis on transition to stationary phase. This cluster includes 56 of 115 genes already known to play roles in stationary phase. Our results suggest that the actual number of genes induced on entrance into stationary phase is closer to 200 and that Lrp affects nearly three-quarters of them, including genes involved in response to nutrient limitation, high concentrations of organic acids, and osmotic stress.

Identification, cloning and characterization of a new DNA-binding protein from the hyperthermophilic methanogen Methanopyrus kandleri

Three novel DNA-binding proteins with apparent molecular masses of 7, 10 and 30 kDa have been isolated from the hyperthermophilic methanogen Methanopyrus kandleri. The proteins were identified using a blot overlay assay that was modified to emulate the high ionic strength intracellular environment of M.kandleri proteins. A 7 kDa protein, named 7kMk, was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. As indicated by CD spectroscopy and computer-assisted structure prediction methods, 7kMk is a substantially alpha-helical protein possibly containing a short N-terminal beta-strand. According to analytical gel filtration chromatography and chemical crosslinking, 7kMk exists as a stable dimer, susceptible to further oligomerization. Electron microscopy showed that 7kMk bends DNA and also leads to the formation of loop-like structures of approximately 43.5 +/- 3.5 nm (136 +/- 11 bp for B-form DNA) circumference. A topoisomerase relaxation assay demonstrated that looped DNA is negatively supercoiled under physiologically relevant conditions (high salt and temperature). A BLAST search did not yield 7kMk homologs at the amino acid sequence level, but based on a multiple alignment with ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) transcriptional regulators, fold features and self-association properties of 7kMk we hypothesize that it could be related to RHH proteins.

Structure of the Lrp-regulated serA promoter of Escherichia coli K-12

Expression of the Escherichia coli serA gene is activated in vivo by the product of the lrp gene, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), an effect partially reversed by L-leucine. We show here that serA is transcribed from two promoters, P1 45 bp upstream of the translation start site, and P2 92 bp further upstream. Lrp binds to a long AT-rich sequence from -158 to -82 from the start of the coding region, i.e. upstream of P1 and overlapping P2. It activates transcription from P1 and represses expression from P2. A second regulator, cAMP/CRP, activates P2, an effect that is largely inhibited by Lrp, such that catabolite repressor protein (Crp) and Lrp are rival activators of serA transcription.

Identification of the secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) as a target of IRF-1 regulation

Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF)-1 is a multifunctional transcription factor, involved in cell growth regulation, pathogen response and immune activation. To identify novel gene targets that may contribute to IRF-1 mediated activities, RNA fingerprinting was performed using NIH3T3 cells that inducibly express a hybrid form of IRF-1 under tetracycline regulated control. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) - a regulator of inflammation and an inhibitor of the LPS response - was identified as a gene repressed after doxycycline induced IRF-1 expression. Preliminary analysis of the human SLPI promoter identified an ISRE-like site located within the -221 to -200 region to which IRF-1 binds and a second, putative IRF-1 binding site upstream of the TATA box. Furthermore, co-transfection studies demonstrated that SLPI expression was inhibited by IRF-1 co-expression. The identification of SLPI as a target of IRF-1 regulation reveals a unique involvement of IRF-1 in repression of gene transcription and assigns a novel role for IRF-1 in inflammation.

An Lrp-type transcriptional regulator from Agrobacterium tumefaciens condenses more than 100 nucleotides of DNA into globular nucleoprotein complexes

The PutR protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens positively regulates expression of the putA gene in response to exogenous proline, resulting in the utilization of proline as a source of carbon and nitrogen. PutR activity required a region of DNA extending more than 106 nt upstream of the putA transcription start site. Purified PutR bound to this region with high degree of affinity and repressed expression of the putR promoter in vitro. PutR also activated the putA promoter in vitro in the presence of proline, though less strongly than in whole cells. PutR protected a DNA interval extending from nucleotides -30 to -140, but protected only one helical face over most of this interval, suggesting that it may bind only to this face of the DNA. The addition of proline caused a slight decrease in binding affinity and altered DNase I protection patterns along the entire length of the binding site. PutR-DNA complexes were found by atomic force microscopy to be globular rather than elongated. Although the DNA fragment in these complexes was 190 nm in length, the length of the visible DNA was only 150 nm, indicating that 40 nm of DNA (115 nt) must be condensed with protein. PutR caused a net bend of this binding site, and under some conditions, proline shifted the center of this bend by one helical turn.

Using sequence logos and information analysis of Lrp DNA binding sites to investigate discrepancies between natural selection and SELEX

In vitro experiments that characterize DNA-protein interactions by artificial selection, such as SELEX,are often performed with the assumption that the experimental conditions are equivalent to natural ones. To test whether SELEX gives natural results, we compared sequence logos composed from naturally occurring leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) binding sites with those composed from SELEX-generated binding sites. The sequence logos were significantly different, indicating that the binding conditions are disparate. A likely explanation is that the SELEX experiment selected for a dimeric or trimeric Lrp complex bound to DNA. In contrast, natural sites appear to be bound by a monomer. This discrepancy suggests that in vitro selections do not necessarily give binding site sets comparable with the natural binding sites.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

Leucine alters the interaction of the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) with the fim switch to stimulate site-specific recombination in Escherichia coli

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global regulator that controls the expression of numerous operons in Escherichia coli. Lrp can act as a repressor or as an activator of transcription with its effects being potentiated, repressed or unaffected by the presence of exogenous leucine. The phase variation of type 1 fimbria in E. coli provides a unique system in which to investigate the effects of leucine on Lrp, as it is the only known example in which Lrp is a positive regulator and leucine potentiates this effect. Previous studies determined that Lrp binds with high affinity to two sites within the fim switch (fim sites 1 and 2), and binding to these sites stimulates recombination. Here, it is shown that, even though leucine stimulates the fim switch in vivo, it nevertheless causes a slight decrease in Lrp binding to the fim switch in vitro. These contradictory results are explicable by the finding that Lrp binding to a third region adjacent to fim sites 1 and 2 inhibits recombination. According to this model, leucine stimulates recombination by selectively disrupting Lrp binding to this newly characterized region, while having little or no effect on Lrp binding to fim sites 1 and 2.

Use of an inducible regulatory protein to identify members of a regulon: application to the regulon controlled by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) in Escherichia coli

Procedures were developed to facilitate the identification of genes that belong to a given regulon and characterization of their responses to the regulator. The regulon controlled by the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) was studied by isolating random transcriptional fusions to lacZ, using lambda placMu53 and a strain in which lrp is under isopropylthio-beta-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible control. Fusions exhibiting IPTG-responsive beta-galactosidase activity were cloned by integrating the suicide vector pIVET1 via homologous recombination at lacZ, followed by self-ligating digested chromosomal DNA. We verified the patterns of lacZ expression after using the plasmid clones to generate merodiploid strains with interrupted and uninterrupted copies of the same sequence. If the merodiploid expression pattern was unchanged from that shown by the original fusion strain, then the cloned fusion was responsible for the regulatory pattern of interest; a difference in the expression pattern could indicate that the original strain carried multiple fusions or that there were autogenous effects of having interrupted the fused gene. Using these procedures, we generated a fusion library of approximately 5 x 10(6) strains; approximately 3,000 of these strains were screened, yielding 84 Lrp-responsive fusions, and 10 of the 84 were phenotypically stable and were characterized. The responses of different fusions in a given operon to in vivo Lrp titrations revealed variations in expression with the position of insertion. Among the newly identified members of the regulon is an open reading frame (orf3) between rpiA and serA. Also, expression of a fusion just downstream of dinF was found to be Lrp dependent only in stationary phase.

A nucleoprotein activation complex between the leucine-responsive regulatory protein and DNA upstream of the gltBDF operon in Escherichia coli

The global regulator Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), in some cases modulated by its co-regulator leucine, has been shown to regulate more than 40 genes and operons in Escherichia coli. Leucine modulates Lrp regulation of leucine-responsive operons. The level of sensitivity of these operons to leucine varies greatly, but the basis for this variation is only partially understood. One operon controlled by Lrp that is relatively insensitive to leucine is gltBDF, which includes genes specifying the large (GltB) and small (GltD) subunits of glutamate synthase. Earlier gel mobility shift assays have demonstrated that Lrp binds to a fragment of DNA containing the gltBDF promoter region. To further define the nature of this Lrp-gltBDF interaction, DNase I footprinting experiments were performed. The results indicate that Lrp binds cooperatively to three sites quite far upstream, spanning the region from -140 to -260 base-pairs relative to the start of transcription. Phased hypersensitivity is observed throughout the entire binding region, suggesting that Lrp bends the DNA. To determine the relative importance of these three sites for the transcriptional activation of gltBDF, a series of site-directed mutations was generated. The effects of these mutations on Lrp binding were determined both by DNase I footprinting and by quantitative mobility shift assays, while their effects on transcription in vivo were examined by measuring beta-galactosidase activity levels of chromosomal gltB::lacZ operon fusions. Our results indicate that all three sites are required for maximal gene expression, as is the proper phasing of the sites with one another and with the start of transcription. Our results suggest that Lrp binds a central palindromic site, interacting predominantly with the major groove of its DNA target, and that additional dimers bind to flanking sites to form a nucleoprotein activation complex.

Lrp is a direct repressor of the dad operon in Escherichia coli

Expression of the degradative D-amino acid dehydrogenase (dad) operon is known to be increased when Escherichia coli is grown in the presence of D- or L-alanine. Alanine is thought to act as an inducer to block the action of a postulated repressor. This operon is also believed to be regulated by catabolite repression. We have used in vivo and in vitro experiments that show that the dad repressor is the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). dad expression in a dad-lacZ operon fusion strain was increased four- to sevenfold when cells were grown in minimal medium containing alanine or leucine. A strain lacking Lrp had high-level constitutive dad expression. Gel retardation and footprinting studies revealed that Lrp binds in vitro to multiple sites over a large area in the dad promoter region. This binding was reduced by alanine or leucine. In vitro transcription assays, using a plasmid template and primer extension analysis, identified three major dad transcripts (Tr1, Tr2, and Tr3). The formation of these transcripts was differentially regulated by cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex, and each was strongly repressed by Lrp. Alanine or leucine completely (for Tr1 and Tr2) or partially (for Tr3) reversed Lrp inhibition. Site-directed mutagenesis of an Lrp binding site strongly reduced Lrp binding and prevented Lrp repression of dad transcription in vivo and in vitro. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that Lrp and alanine or leucine act directly to repress and induce, respectively, transcription of the dad operon.

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) acts as a specific repressor for sigma s-dependent transcription of the Escherichia coli aidB gene

The product of the Escherichia coli aidB gene is homologous to human isovaleryl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase (IVD), an enzyme involved in the breakdown of the amino acid leucine. The aidB gene is not expressed constitutively, but its transcription is induced via distinct mechanisms in response to: (i) exposure to alkylating agents; (ii) acetate at a slightly acidic pH; and (iii) anoxia. Induction by alkylating agents is mediated by the transcriptional activator Ada, in its methylated form (meAda); the other forms of induction are Ada independent and require sigma s, the alternative sigma factor mainly expressed during the stationary phase of bacterial growth. In this report we show that, in the absence of any transcriptional factor, aidB is efficiently transcribed in vitro by the sigma s, but not by the sigma 70, form of RNA polymerase holoenzyme. In the presence of meAda, levels of transcription by both forms of RNA polymerase are significantly increased. However, sigma s-dependent transcription of aidB is inhibited both in vitro and in vivo by binding of the transcriptional regulator Lrp (leucine responsive protein) to the aidB promoter region (PaidB). Lrp acts as a specific repressor for sigma s-dependent transcription of aidB. Leucine counteracts Lrp binding to P aidB, as does binding to P aidB of me Ada, which causes Lrp to dissociate from the promoter. The physiological significance of aidB transcription regulation is discussed.

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) from Escherichia coli. Stoichiometry and minimal requirements for binding to DNA

Lrp (Leucine-responsive regulatory protein) regulates the expression of a number of operons in Escherichia coli. A recent study of DNA sequences recognized by Lrp established the consensus as a 15-bp sequence, YAGHAWATTWTDCTR (Y = C/T, H = "not G," W = A/T, D ="not C," R = A/G) (Cui, Y., Wang, Q., Stormo, G. D., and Calvo, J. M. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 4872-4880). Here we report the stoichiometry of Lrp binding (an Lrp dimer binds to a single binding site) and studies that define the minimal length of DNA required for binding. A double-stranded 15 mer having a sequence that closely matches the consensus does not show measurable binding to Lrp. One or two base pairs of DNA flanking each end are not sufficient for binding, but constructs having 3-5 additional base pairs (21 mer) show relatively strong binding. Single-stranded flanking DNA also contributes to strong binding. The extent of the contribution to binding is dependent upon whether the single strand is on the left or right of the double-stranded region and whether the polarity of the single-stranded DNA is 5' to 3' or 3' to 5'.

A consensus sequence for binding of Lrp to DNA

Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) is a major regulatory protein involved in the expression of numerous operons in Escherichia coli. For ilvIH, one of the operons positively regulated by Lrp, Lrp binds to multiple sites upstream of the transcriptional start site and activates transcription. An alignment of 12 Lrp binding sites within ilvIH DNA from two different organisms revealed a tentative consensus sequence AGAAT TTTATTCT (Q. Wang, M. Sacco, E. Ricca, C.T. Lago, M. DeFelice, and J.M. Calvo, Mol. Microbiol. 7:883-891, 1993). To further characterize the binding specificity of Lrp, we used a variation of the Selex procedure of C. Tuerk and L. Gold (Science 249:505-510, 1990) to identify sequences that bound Lrp out of a pool of 10(12) different DNA molecules. We identified 63 related DNA sequences that bound Lrp and estimated their relative binding affinities for Lrp. A consensus sequence derived from analysis of these sequences, YAGHAWATTWT DCTR, where Y = C or T, H = not G, W = A or T, D = not C, and R = A or G, contains clear dyad symmetry and is very similar to the one defined earlier. To test the idea that Lrp in the presence of leucine might bind to a different subset of DNA sequences, we carried out a second selection experiment with leucine present during the binding reactions. DNA sequences selected in the presence or absence of leucine were similar, and leucine did not stimulate binding to any of the sequences that were selected in the presence of leucine. Therefore, it is unlikely that leucine changes the specificity of Lrp binding.

Lysyl-tRNA synthetase

Lysyl-tRNA synthetase catalyses the formation of lysyl-transfer RNA, Lys-tRNA(Lys), which then is ready to insert lysine into proteins. Lysine is important for proteins since it is one of only two proteinogenic amino acids carrying an alkaline functional group. Seven genes of lysyl-tRNA synthetases have been localized in five organisms, and the nucleotide and the amino acid sequences have been established. The lysyl-tRNA synthetase molecules are of average chain lengths among the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, which range from about 300 to 1100 amino acids. Lysyl-tRNA synthetases act as dimers; in eukaryotes they can be localized in multienzyme complexes and can contain carbohydrates or lipids. Lysine tRNA is recognized by lysyl-tRNA synthetase via standard identity elements, namely anticodon region and acceptor stem. The aminoacylation follows the standard two-step mechanism. However the accuracy of selecting lysine against the other amino acids is less than average. The first threedimensional structure of a lysyl-tRNA synthetase worked out very recently, using the enzyme from the Escherichia coli lysU gene which binds one molecule of lysine, is similar to those of other class II synthetases. However, none of the reaction steps catalyzed by the enzyme is clarified to atomic resolution. Thus surprising findings might be possible. Lysyl-tRNA synthetase and its precursors as well as its substrates and products are targets and starting points of many regulation circuits, e.g. in multienzyme complex formation and function, dinucleoside polyphosphate synthesis, heat shock regulation, activation or deactivation by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, inhibition by amino acid analogs, and generation of antibodies against lysyl-tRNA synthetase. None of these pathways is clarified completely.

Comparison of the enzymatic properties of the two Escherichia coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase species

In Escherichia coli, lysyl-tRNA synthetase activity is encoded by either a constitutive lysS gene or an inducible one, lysU. The two corresponding enzymes could be purified at homogeneity from a delta lysU and a delta lysS strain, respectively. Comparison of the pure enzymes, LysS and LysU, indicates that, in the presence of saturating substrates, LysS is about twice more active than LysU in the ATP-PPi exchange as well as in the tRNALys aminoacylation reaction. Moreover, the dissociation constant of the LysU-lysine complex is 8-fold smaller than that of the LysS-lysine complex. In agreement with this difference, the activity of LysU is less sensitive than that of LysS to the addition of cadaverine, a decarboxylation product of lysine and a competitive inhibitor of lysine binding to its synthetase. This observation points to a possible useful role of LysU, under physiological conditions causing cadaverine accumulation in the bacterium. Remarkably, these conditions also induce lysU expression. Homogeneous LysU and LysS were also compared in Ap4A synthesis. LysU is only 2-fold more active than LysS in the production of this dinucleotide. This makes unlikely that the heat-inducible LysU species could be preferentially involved in the accumulation of Ap4A inside stressed Escherichia coli cells. This conclusion could be strengthened by determining the concentrations of Ap4N (N = A, C, G, or U) in a delta lysU as well as in a lysU+ strain, before and after a 1-h temperature shift at 48 degrees C. The measured concentration values were the same in both strains.

Regulation of lrp gene expression by H-NS and Lrp proteins in Escherichia coli: dominant negative mutations in lrp

Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) is a global transcription factor of Escherichia coli and regulates, negatively or positively, many genes including lysU, which encodes lysyl-tRNA synthetase. Dominant negative mutations that derepress lysU expression were isolated in this study. These mutations affected a predicted DNA-binding domain of Lrp and mutants were defective DNA-binding domain of Lrp and mutants were defective both in activation of ilvIH expression and in repression of lysU expression. Consistent with the previous notion that lrp is autoregulated, lrp expression was derepressed by these mutations and repressed by multi-copy plasmids carrying lrp+. Moreover, we found by gene fusion and Northern blot hybridization that the "histone-like" protein, H-NS, bound specifically to a promoter segment of lrp in vitro, and the level of lrp expression increased in the hns null mutant. These results indicated that the lrp gene is not only feedback regulated by Lrp but is also controlled by H-NS protein.

The occurrence of duplicate lysyl-tRNA synthetase gene homologs in Escherichia coli and other procaryotes

The lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) system of Escherichia coli K-12 consists of two genes, lysS, which is constitutive, and lysU, which is inducible. It is of importance to know how extensively the two-gene LysRS system is distributed in procaryotes, in particular, among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. To this end, the enterics E. coli K-12 and B; E. coli reference collection (ECOR) isolates EC2, EC49, EC65, and EC68; Shigella flexneri; Salmonella typhimurium; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Enterobacter aerogenes; Serratia marcescens; and Proteus vulgaris and the nonenterics Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus megaterium were grown in AC broth to a pH of 5.5 or less or cultured in SABO medium at pH 5.0. These growth conditions are known to induce LysRS activity (LysU synthesis) in E. coli K-12. Significant induction of LysRS activity (twofold or better) was observed in the E. coli strains, the ECOR isolates, S. flexneri, K. pneumoniae, and E. aerogenes. To demonstrate an association between LysRS induction and two distinct LysRS genes, Southern blotting was performed with a probe representing an 871-bp fragment amplified from an internal portion of the coding region of the lysU gene. In initial experiments, chromosomal DNA from E. coli K-12 strain MC4100 (lysS+ lysU+) was double digested with either BamHI and HindIII or BamHI and SalI, producing hybridizable fragments of 12.4 and 4.2 kb and 6.6 and 5.2 kb, respectively. Subjecting the chromosomal DNA of E. coli K-12 strain GNB10181 (lysS+ delta lysU) to the same regimen established that the larger fragment from each digestion contained the lysU gene. The results of Southern blot analysis of the other bacterial strains revealed that two hybridizable fragments were obtained from all of the E. coli and ECOR collection strains examined and S. flexneri, K. pneumoniae, and E. aerogenes. Only one lysU homolog was found with S. typhimurium and S. marcescens, and none was obtained with P. vulgaris. A single hybridizable band was found with both P. aeruginose and B, megaterium. These results show that the dual-gene LysRS system is not confined to E. coli K-12 and indicate that it may have first appeared in the genus Enterobacter.

The amino acid sequence of Lrp is highly conserved in four enteric microorganisms

Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) is a global regulator of metabolism in Escherichia coli (J. M. Calvo and R. G. Matthews, Microbiol. Rev. 58:466-490, 1994). The lrp genes from three other enteric microorganisms, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella aerogenes, and Salmonella typhimurium, were cloned and sequenced. An analysis of these sequences and of the previously determined sequence from E. coli indicated that the vast majority of changes were synonymous rather than nonsynonymous changes. Nucleotide changes occurred at 89 of 492 positions but resulted in amino acid changes at only 2 of 164 positions. This analysis suggests that the Lrp amino acid sequence is highly adapted for function and that almost all amino acid changes lead to a protein that functions less well than the wild-type protein.

The crystal structure of the lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysU) from Escherichia coli

BACKGROUND

Lysyl-tRNA synthetase catalyzes the attachment of the amino acid lysine to the cognate tRNA. The enzyme is a member of the class II amino-acyl-tRNA synthetases; the crystal structures of the seryl- and aspartyl-tRNA synthetases from this class are already known. Lysyl-tRNA synthetase shows extensive sequence homology with aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. In Escherichia coli there are two isoforms of the enzyme, LysS and LysU. Unlike LysS, which is synthesized under normal growth conditions, LysU is the product of a normally silent gene which is overexpressed under extreme physiological conditions (such as heat-shock), and can synthesize a number of adenyl dinucleotides (in particular AppppA). These dinucleotides have been proposed to act as modulators of the heat-shock response and stress response.

RESULTS

The crystal structure of E. coli LysU has been determined to 2.8 A resolution, with lysine bound to the active site. The protein is a homodimer, with a rather extended dimer interface spanning the entire length of the molecule. Each monomer consists of two domains: a smaller N-terminal domain which binds the tRNA anticodon, and a larger C-terminal domain with the topology characteristic of the catalytic domain found in class II synthetases.

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of the LysU crystal structure with the structures of seryl- and aspartyl-tRNA synthetases enables a conserved core to be identified. The structural homology with the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase extends to include the anticodon-binding domain. When the active sites of lysyl-, aspartyl- and seryl-tRNA synthetases are compared, a number of catalytically important residues are conserved and a similar extended network of hydrogen bonds can be observed in the amino acid binding pocket in all three structures, although the details may differ. The lysine substrate is involved in an extended network of hydrogen bonds and polar interactions, with the side chain amino group forming a salt bridge with Glu428. The binding of ATP to LysU can be modelled on the basis of the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase-ATP complex, but the tRNA acceptor stem interaction for LysU cannot be easily modelled by similar extrapolation.

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein of Escherichia coli negatively regulates transcription of ompC and micF and positively regulates translation of ompF

The two major porins of Escherichia coli K-12 strains, OmpC and OmpF, are inversely regulated with respect to one another. The expression of OmpC and OmpF has been shown to be influenced by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp): two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of proteins from strains with and strains without a functional Lrp protein revealed that OmpC expression is increased in an lrp strain, while OmpF expression is decreased. In agreement with these findings, we now present evidence that transcriptional (operon) fusions of lacZ+ to ompC and micF are negatively regulated by Lrp. Lrp binds specifically to the intergenic region between micF and ompC, as indicated by mobility shift assays and by DNase I footprinting. The expression of an ompF'-lacZ+ gene (translational) fusion is increased 3.7-fold in an lrp+ background compared with an lrp background, but expression of an ompF-lacZ+ operon fusion is not. Studies of in vivo expression of the outer membrane porins during growth on glucose minimal medium showed that the OmpF/OmpC ratio is higher in lrp+ strains than it is in isogenic lrp strains. The effect of Lrp was not seen in a strain containing a deletion of micF. Our studies suggest that the positive effect of Lrp on OmpF expression stems from a negative effect of Lrp on the expression of micF, an antisense RNA that inhibits ompF translation.

Regulation of lysyl-tRNA synthetase expression by histone-like protein H-NS of Escherichia coli

The lysU gene encoding lysyl-tRNA synthetase of Escherichia coli is normally silent at low temperatures and is expressed by certain metabolites and stimuli. A novel class of lysU-constitutive mutations were isolated by random insertion mutagenesis. These mutations nullified the hns gene encoding a histone-like protein, H-NS, and affected thermoregulation of lysU.

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein, a global regulator of metabolism in Escherichia coli

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) regulates the expression of more than 40 genes and proteins in Escherichia coli. Among the operons that are positively regulated by Lrp are operons involved in amino acid biosynthesis (ilvIH, serA)), in the biosynthesis of pili (pap, fan, fim), and in the assimilation of ammonia (glnA, gltBD). Negatively regulated operons include operons involved in amino acid catabolism (sdaA, tdh) and peptide transport (opp) and the operon coding for Lrp itself (lrp). Detailed studies of a few members of the regulon have shown that Lrp can act directly to activate or repress transcription of target operons. A substantial fraction of operons regulated by Lrp are also regulated by leucine, and the effect of leucine on expression of these operons requires a functional Lrp protein. The patterns of regulation are surprising and interesting: in some cases activation or repression mediated by Lrp is antagonized by leucine, in other cases Lrp-mediated activation or repression is potentiated by leucine, and in still other cases leucine has no effect on Lrp-mediated regulation. Current research is just beginning to elucidate the detailed mechanisms by which Lrp can mediate such a broad spectrum of regulatory effects. Our view of the role of Lrp in metabolism may change as more members of the regulon are identified and their regulation characterized, but at this point Lrp seems to be important in regulating nitrogen metabolism and one-carbon metabolism, permitting adaptations to feast and to famine.

Regulation of the Escherichia coli lrp gene

Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) is a major Escherichia coli regulatory protein which regulates expression of a number of operons, some negatively and some positively. This work relates to a characterization of lrp, the gene encoding Lrp. Nucleotide sequencing established that the coding regions of lrp and trxB (encoding thioredoxin reductase) are separated by 543 bp and that the two genes are transcribed in opposite directions. In addition, we used primer extension, deletion analyses, and lrp-lacZ transcriptional fusions to delineate the promoter and regulatory region of the lrp operon. The lrp promoter is located 267 nucleotides upstream of the translational start codon of the lrp gene. In comparison with a wild-type strain, expression of the lrp operon was increased about 3-fold in a strain lacking Lrp and decreased about 10-fold in a strain overproducing Lrp. As observed from DNA mobility shift and DNase I footprinting analyses, Lrp binds to one or more sites within the region -80 to -32 relative to the start point of lrp transcription. A mutational analysis indicated that this same region is at least partly required for repression of lrp expression in vivo. These results demonstrate that autogenous regulation of lrp involves Lrp acting directly to cause repression of lrp transcription.

The H-NS protein modulates the activation of the ilvIH operon of Escherichia coli K12 by Lrp, the leucine regulatory protein

The H-NS protein, the product of the hns gene, plays a central role in the cellular response of bacteria to environmental stresses such as modification of osmolarity and temperature. The leucine regulatory protein (Lrp) controls a wide array of operons both as an activator (e.g. ilvIH) and as a repressor. We demonstrate that H-NS can decrease the activity of Lrp in stationary phase and under conditions of high osmolarity. Strains containing hns mutations have higher levels of Lrp-activated ilvIH transcription, while strains carrying the hns+ allele on a pBR322 plasmid have lower activity of Lrp-directed ilvIH gene expression.

Functions of the gene products of Escherichia coli

A list of currently identified gene products of Escherichia coli is given, together with a bibliography that provides pointers to the literature on each gene product. A scheme to categorize cellular functions is used to classify the gene products of E. coli so far identified. A count shows that the numbers of genes concerned with small-molecule metabolism are on the same order as the numbers concerned with macromolecule biosynthesis and degradation. One large category is the category of tRNAs and their synthetases. Another is the category of transport elements. The categories of cell structure and cellular processes other than metabolism are smaller. Other subjects discussed are the occurrence in the E. coli genome of redundant pairs and groups of genes of identical or closely similar function, as well as variation in the degree of density of genetic information in different parts of the genome.

Regulation of the gltBDF operon of Escherichia coli: how is a leucine-insensitive operon regulated by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein?

The regulon controlled by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) of Escherichia coli consists of over 40 genes and proteins whose expression is regulated, either positively or negatively, by Lrp. The gltBDF operon, encoding glutamate synthase, was originally identified as a member of the Lrp regulon through a two-dimensional electrophoretic analysis of polypeptides from isogenic strains containing or lacking a functional Lrp protein. We have now demonstrated that Lrp regulates the transcription of gltBDF::lacZ operon fusions. Relative to expression in glucose minimal 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) medium, gltBDF::lacZ expression in an lrp+ strain is repressed 2.2-fold in the presence of 10 mM exogenous leucine and 16-fold in Luria broth. Repression of gltBDF::lacZ expression by leucine or Luria broth is not seen for an isogenic strain containing a Tn10 insertion in lrp, and expression of gltBDF::lacZ is 44-fold lower than in the lrp+ strain when both are grown in glucose minimal MOPS medium. Lrp binds specifically to DNA fragments containing the gltBDF promoter region. Saturating levels of leucine do not abolish binding of Lrp upstream of gltBDF but merely increase its apparent dissociation constant from 2.0 to 6.9 nM. Electrophoretic analysis of the Lrp regulon established that target proteins differ greatly in the degree to which the effect of Lrp on their expression is antagonized by leucine. On the basis of our present results, we present a model for positive regulation of target genes by Lrp. Insensitivity to leucine would be expected when the effective intracellular concentration of Lrp is high relative to the affinity of Lrp binding sites required for transcription of the target gene. At lower concentrations of Lrp, transcription of the target gene should be sensitive to leucine. This model suggests that regulation of the concentration of active Lrp is critical to control of the Lrp regulon.

Control and function of lysyl-tRNA synthetases: diversity and co-ordination

Lysyl-tRNA synthetases are synthesized from two distinct genes in Escherichia coli, lysS (constitutively) and lysU (inducibly); however, the physiological significance and the differential control mechanism of these two genes have been a long-standing puzzle. Recent studies have successfully uncovered a significant control mechanism of lysU expression, which involves the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and a translational enhancer element called 'downstream box'. Moreover, it is likely that there is a mechanism underlying co-ordinate expression of lysU with other genes outside the leucine-Lrp regulon under harsh conditions such as low pH and anaerobiosis. A possible mechanism of lysyl-tRNA synthetase expression and function is reviewed.

A stereospecific alignment between the promoter and the cis-acting sequence is required for Lrp-dependent activation of ilvIH transcription in Escherichia coli

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a DNA binding protein that affects, either positively or negatively, the expression of several E. coli genes. The ilvIH operon is positively regulated by Lrp and leucine counteracts this effect reducing 5- to 10-fold the efficiency of ilvIH transcription. An investigation of the mechanism of transcription activation of the ilvIH operon by Lrp indicated that: (i) a stereospecific alignment between the ilvIH promoter and the cis-acting sequence upstream of it is required for activation; (ii) a correct distance between the promoter and the adjacent cis-acting sequence is needed for leucine to counteract the positive role of Lrp; (iii) Lrp fails to activate transcription when the cis-acting region is placed several hundred base pairs upstream of the ilvIH promoter.

Multiple control of Escherichia coli lysyl-tRNA synthetase expression involves a transcriptional repressor and a translational enhancer element

Lysyl-tRNA synthetases [L-lysine:tRNA(Lys) ligase (AMP-forming), EC 6.1.1.6] are synthesized from two distinct genes in Escherichia coli, lysS (constitutively) and lysU (inducibly), but neither the physiological significance nor the mechanism of differential regulation of these two genes is understood. We have constructed a null mutation of lysS that causes cold-sensitive lethality and then used this mutant to acquire and characterize several bypass mutations called als (abandonment of lysS). Cold-resistant survivors were isolated either spontaneously or by transposon-mediated disruption, and all caused derepression of lysU transcription. One class of als mutations is linked to lysU and presumably affects the cis regulatory element. Mutations of the other class map within the lrp gene, which encodes the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). A lysU-lacZ gene fusion study revealed that lysU is susceptible to thermal regulation in the absence of lrp and that a small mRNA region immediately downstream of the initiation codon is required for potentially high-level expression. These results suggest that lysU is part of the leucine regulon and is both negatively controlled by Lrp and positively regulated by a potential translational enhancer sequence. This sequence is similar to that of the "downstream box" complementary to nucleotides 1469-1483 of 16S rRNA, which can be universally found in tRNA synthetase genes of E. coli.

Lrp stimulates phase variation of type 1 fimbriation in Escherichia coli K-12

The phase variation of type 1 fimbriation in Escherichia coli is associated with the inversion of a short DNA element. This element (switch) acts in cis to control transcription of fimA, the major fimbrial subunit gene. Thus, fimA is transcribed when the switch is in one orientation (the on orientation) but not the other (the off orientation). The fim inversion requires either fimB (on-to-off or off-to-on inversion) or fimE (on-to-off inversion only), as well as integration host factor, and is also influenced by the abundant DNA-binding protein H-NS. Here we report that an additional gene, lrp, a factor known to influence the expression of both Pap and K99 fimbriae, is also required for normal activity of the fim switch. The frequencies of both fimB-promoted and fimE-promoted inversions, and consequently the phase variation of type 1 fimbriation, are lower in lrp mutants. Lrp affects slightly the transcription of both fimB (which is increased) and fimE (which is decreased). We believe that these alterations in fimB and fimE transcription alone are unlikely to account for the sharp reduction in switching found in lrp mutants.