The asiA gene product of bacteriophage T4 is required for middle mode RNA synthesis

Overexpression, purification, and partial characterization of ADP-ribosyltransferases modA and modB of bacteriophage T4

There is increasing experimental evidence that ADP-ribosylation of host proteins is an important means to regulate gene expression of bacteriophage T4. Surprisingly, this phage codes for three different ADP-ribosyltransferases, gene products Alt, ModA, and ModB, modifying partially overlapping sets of host proteins. While gene product Alt already has been isolated as a recombinant protein and its action on host RNA polymerases and transcription regulation have been studied, the nucleotide sequences of the two mod genes was published only recently. Their mode of action in the course of the infection cycle and the consequences of the ADP-ribosylations catalyzed by these enzymes remain to be investigated. Here we describe the cloning of the genes, the overexpression, purification, and partial characterization of ADP-ribosyltransferases ModA and ModB. Both proteins seem to act independently, and the ADP-ribosyl moieties are transferred to different sets of host proteins. While gene product ModA, similarly to the Alt protein, acts also on the alpha-subunit of host RNA polymerase, the ModB activity serves another set of proteins, one of which was identified as the S1 protein associated with the 30S subunit of the E. coli ribosomes.

Visualizing the phage T4 activated transcription complex of DNA and E. coli RNA polymerase

The ability of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to select the right promoter sequence at the right time is fundamental to the control of gene expression in all organisms. However, there is only one crystallized structure of a complete activator/RNAP/DNA complex. In a process called σ appropriation, bacteriophage T4 activates a class of phage promoters using an activator (MotA) and a co-activator (AsiA), which function through interactions with the σ⁷⁰ subunit of RNAP. We have developed a holistic, structure-based model for σ appropriation using multiple experimentally determined 3D structures (Escherichia coli RNAP, the Thermus aquaticus RNAP/DNA complex, AsiA /σ⁷⁰ Region 4, the N-terminal domain of MotA [MotA^NTD], and the C-terminal domain of MotA [MotA^CTD]), molecular modeling, and extensive biochemical observations indicating the position of the proteins relative to each other and to the DNA. Our results visualize how AsiA/MotA redirects σ, and therefore RNAP activity, to T4 promoter DNA, and demonstrate at a molecular level how the tactful interaction of transcriptional factors with even small segments of RNAP can alter promoter specificity. Furthermore, our model provides a rational basis for understanding how a mutation within the β subunit of RNAP (G1249D), which is far removed from AsiA or MotA, impairs σ appropriation.

Biochemical insights into the function of phage G1 gp67 in Staphylococcus aureus

Bacteriophage (phage) are among the most diverse and abundant life forms on Earth. Studies have recently used phage diversity to identify novel antimicrobial peptides and proteins. We showed that one such phage protein, Staphylococcus aureus (Sau) phage G1 gp67, inhibits cell growth in Sau by an unusual mechanism. Gp67 binds to the host RNA polymerase (RNAP) through an interaction with the promoter specificity σ subunit, but unlike many other σ-binding phage proteins, gp67 does not disrupt transcription at most promoters. Rather, gp67 prevents binding of another RNAP domain, the α-C-terminal domain, to upstream A/T-rich elements required for robust transcription at rRNA promoters. Here, we discuss additional biochemical insights on gp67, how phage promoters escape the inhibitory function of gp67, and methodological advancements that were foundational to our work.

Transcriptional control in the prereplicative phase of T4 development

Control of transcription is crucial for correct gene expression and orderly development. For many years, bacteriophage T4 has provided a simple model system to investigate mechanisms that regulate this process. Development of T4 requires the transcription of early, middle and late RNAs. Because T4 does not encode its own RNA polymerase, it must redirect the polymerase of its host, E. coli, to the correct class of genes at the correct time. T4 accomplishes this through the action of phage-encoded factors. Here I review recent studies investigating the transcription of T4 prereplicative genes, which are expressed as early and middle transcripts. Early RNAs are generated immediately after infection from T4 promoters that contain excellent recognition sequences for host polymerase. Consequently, the early promoters compete extremely well with host promoters for the available polymerase. T4 early promoter activity is further enhanced by the action of the T4 Alt protein, a component of the phage head that is injected into E. coli along with the phage DNA. Alt modifies Arg265 on one of the two α subunits of RNA polymerase. Although work with host promoters predicts that this modification should decrease promoter activity, transcription from some T4 early promoters increases when RNA polymerase is modified by Alt. Transcription of T4 middle genes begins about 1 minute after infection and proceeds by two pathways: 1) extension of early transcripts into downstream middle genes and 2) activation of T4 middle promoters through a process called sigma appropriation. In this activation, the T4 co-activator AsiA binds to Region 4 of σ⁷⁰, the specificity subunit of RNA polymerase. This binding dramatically remodels this portion of σ⁷⁰, which then allows the T4 activator MotA to also interact with σ⁷⁰. In addition, AsiA restructuring of σ⁷⁰ prevents Region 4 from forming its normal contacts with the -35 region of promoter DNA, which in turn allows MotA to interact with its DNA binding site, a MotA box, centered at the -30 region of middle promoter DNA. T4 sigma appropriation reveals how a specific domain within RNA polymerase can be remolded and then exploited to alter promoter specificity.

Determinants of affinity and activity of the anti-sigma factor AsiA

The AsiA protein is a T4 bacteriophage early gene product that regulates transcription of host and viral genes. Monomeric AsiA binds tightly to the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, thereby inhibiting transcription from bacterial promoters and phage early promoters and coactivating transcription from phage middle promoters. Results of structural studies have identified amino acids at the protomer-protomer interface in dimeric AsiA and at the monomeric AsiA-sigma(70) interface and demonstrated substantial overlap in the sets of residues that comprise each. Here we evaluate the contributions of individual interfacial amino acid side chains to protomer-protomer affinity in AsiA homodimers, to monomeric AsiA affinity for sigma(70), and to AsiA function in transcription. Sedimentation equilibrium, dynamic light scattering, electrophoretic mobility shift, and transcription activity measurements were used to assess affinity and function of site-specific AsiA mutants. Alanine substitutions for solvent-inaccessible residues positioned centrally in the protomer-protomer interface of the AsiA homodimer, V14, I17, and I40, resulted in the largest changes in free energy of dimer association, whereas alanine substitutions at other interfacial positions had little effect. These residues also contribute significantly to AsiA-dependent regulation of RNA polymerase activity, as do additional residues positioned at the periphery of the interface (K20 and F21). Notably, the relative contributions of a given amino acid side chain to RNA polymerase inhibition and activation (MotA-independent) by AsiA are very similar in most cases. The mainstay for intermolecular affinity and AsiA function appears to be I17. Our results define the core interfacial residues of AsiA, establish roles for many of the interfacial amino acids, are in agreement with the tenets underlying protein-protein interactions and interfaces, and will be beneficial for a general, comprehensive understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of bacterial RNA polymerase regulation.

A mutation within the β subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase impairs transcription from bacteriophage T4 middle promoters

During infection of Escherichia coli, bacteriophage T4 usurps the host transcriptional machinery, redirecting it to the expression of early, middle, and late phage genes. Middle genes, whose expression begins about 1 min postinfection, are transcribed both from the extension of early RNA into middle genes and by the activation of T4 middle promoters. Middle-promoter activation requires the T4 transcriptional activator MotA and coactivator AsiA, which are known to interact with σ(70), the specificity subunit of RNA polymerase. T4 motA amber [motA(Am)] or asiA(Am) phage grows poorly in wild-type E. coli. However, previous work has found that T4 motA(Am)does not grow in the E. coli mutant strain TabG. We show here that the RNA polymerase in TabG contains two mutations within its β-subunit gene: rpoB(E835K) and rpoB(G1249D). We find that the G1249D mutation is responsible for restricting the growth of either T4 motA(Am)or asiA(Am) and for impairing transcription from MotA/AsiA-activated middle promoters in vivo. With one exception, transcription from tested T4 early promoters is either unaffected or, in some cases, even increases, and there is no significant growth phenotype for the rpoB(E835K G1249D) strain in the absence of T4 infection. In reported structures of thermophilic RNA polymerase, the G1249 residue is located immediately adjacent to a hydrophobic pocket, called the switch 3 loop. This loop is thought to aid in the separation of the RNA from the DNA-RNA hybrid as RNA enters the RNA exit channel. Our results suggest that the presence of MotA and AsiA may impair the function of this loop or that this portion of the β subunit may influence interactions among MotA, AsiA, and RNA polymerase.

Direct activator/co-activator interaction is essential for bacteriophage T4 middle gene expression

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein is a bifunctional regulator that inhibits transcription from the major class of bacterial promoters and also serves as an essential co-activator of transcription from T4 middle promoters. AsiA binds the primary s factor in Escherichia coli, sigma(70), and modifies the promoter recognition properties of the sigma(70)-containing RNA polymerase(RNAP) holoenzyme. In its role as co-activator, AsiA directs RNAP to T4 middle promoters in the presence of the T4-encoded activator MotA. According to the current model for T4 middle promoter activation, AsiA plays an indirect role in stabilizing the activation complex by facilitating interaction between DNA-bound MotA and sigma(70). Here we show that AsiA also plays a direct role in T4 middle promoter activation by contacting the MotA activation domain. Furthermore,we show that interaction between AsiA and the beta-flap domain of RNAP is important for co-activation. Based on our findings, we propose a revised model for T4 middle promoter activation, with AsiA organizing the activation complex via three distinct protein-protein interactions.

Inhibition of transcription in Staphylococcus aureus by a primary sigma factor-binding polypeptide from phage G1

The primary sigma factor of Staphylococcus aureus, sigma(SA), regulates the transcription of many genes, including several essential genes, in this bacterium via specific recognition of exponential growth phase promoters. In this study, we report the existence of a novel staphylococcal phage G1-derived growth inhibitory polypeptide, referred to as G1ORF67, that interacts with sigma(SA) both in vivo and in vitro and regulates its activity. Delineation of the minimal domain of sigma(SA) that is required for its interaction with G1ORF67 as amino acids 294 to 360 near the carboxy terminus suggests that the G1 phage-encoded anti-sigma factor may occlude the -35 element recognition domain of sigma(SA). As would be predicted by this hypothesis, the G1ORF67 polypeptide abolished both RNA polymerase core-dependent binding of sigma(SA) to DNA and sigma(SA)-dependent transcription in vitro. While G1ORF67 profoundly inhibits transcription when expressed in S. aureus cells in mode of action studies, our finding that G1ORF67 was unable to inhibit transcription when expressed in Escherichia coli concurs with its inability to inhibit transcription by the E. coli holoenzyme in vitro. These features demonstrate the selectivity of G1ORF67 for S. aureus RNA polymerase. We predict that G1ORF67 is one of the central polypeptides in the phage G1 strategy to appropriate host RNA polymerase and redirect it to phage reproduction.

Middle promoters constitute the most abundant and diverse class of promoters in bacteriophage T4

The temporally regulated transcription program of bacteriophage T4 relies upon the sequential utilization of three classes of promoters: early, middle and late. Here we show that middle promoters constitute perhaps the largest and the most diverse class of T4 promoters. In addition to 45 T4 middle promoters known to date, we mapped 13 new promoters, 10 of which deviate from the consensus MotA box, with some of them having no obvious match to it. So, 30 promoters of 58 identified now deviate from the consensus sequence deduced previously. In spite of the differences in their sequences, the in vivo activities of these T4 middle promoters were demonstrated to be dependent on both activators, MotA and AsiA. Traditionally, the MotA box was restricted to a 9 bp sequence with the highly conserved motif TGCTT. New logo based on the sequences of currently known middle promoters supports the conclusion that the consensus MotA box is comprised of 10 bp with the highly conserved central motif GCT. However, some apparently good matches to the consensus of middle promoters do not produce transcripts either in vivo or in vitro, indicating that the consensus sequence alone does not fully define a middle promoter.

Both regions 4.1 and 4.2 of E. coli sigma(70) are together required for binding to bacteriophage T4 AsiA in vivo

The T4 AsiA is an anti-sigma factor encoded by one of the early genes of Bacteriophage T4. It has been shown that AsiA inhibits transcription from promoters containing -10 and -35 consensus sequence by binding to sigma(70) of E. coli. Binding of AsiA to sigma(70) in vivo, in E. coli, leads to inhibition of transcription of essential genes resulting in killing of the organism. By using various in vitro methods, the region of sigma(70) binding to AsiA have been mapped to domain 4.2. Additionally, mutational analysis of sigma(70) has also identified amino acid residues in domain 4.1 which are critical for interaction with AsiA. Based on NMR studies it has been suggested that either of these regions can bind to AsiA, a conclusion which was supported by high degree of amino acid homology between domain 4.1 and 4.2. However, it is not clear whether under in vivo conditions, AsiA exerts its transcription inhibitory effect by binding to one of these regions or both the regions together. In order to understand the mechanism of AsiA mediated inhibition of E. coli transcription in vivo, in terms of specific binding requirements to region 4.1 and/or 4.2, we have studied the interaction of these sub-domains with AsiA by Yeast two hybrid system as well as by co-expressing and affinity purification of the interacting partners in vivo in E. coli. It was observed that minimum fragment of sigma(70) showing observable binding to AsiA, must possess sub-domains 4.1 and 4.2 together. No binding could be detected in sigma(70) fragments lacking a part of either domain 4.1 or 4.2, in any of the assays. This data was also supported by in vitro binding studies wherein only sigma(70) fragments carrying both region 4.1 and 4.2 showed binding to AsiA. Co-expression of region 4.1 and 4.2 fragments together also did not show any interaction with AsiA. The results presented here suggest that binding of AsiA to sigma(70), in vivo, requires the presence of both sub-domains of region 4 of sigma(70).

An artificial activator that contacts a normally occluded surface of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Many activators of transcription are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that stimulate transcription initiation through interaction with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Such activators can be constructed artificially by fusing a DNA-binding protein to a protein domain that can interact with an accessible surface of RNAP. In these cases, the artificial activator is directed to a target promoter bearing a recognition site for the DNA-binding protein. Here we describe an artificial activator that functions by contacting a normally occluded surface of promoter-bound RNAP holoenzyme. This artificial activator consists of a DNA-binding protein fused to the bacteriophage T4-encoded transcription regulator AsiA. On its own, AsiA inhibits transcription by Escherichia coli RNAP because it remodels the holoenzyme, disrupting an intersubunit interaction that is required for recognition of the major class of bacterial promoters. However, when tethered to the DNA via a DNA-binding protein, AsiA can exert a strong stimulatory effect on transcription by disrupting the same intersubunit interaction, contacting an otherwise occluded surface of the holoenzyme. We show that mutations that affect the intersubunit interaction targeted by AsiA modulate the stimulatory effect of this artificial activator. Our results thus demonstrate that changes in the accessibility of a normally occluded surface of the RNAP holoenzyme can modulate the activity of a gene-specific regulator of transcription.

Transcriptional takeover by σ appropriation: remodelling of the σ 70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by the bacteriophage T4 activator MotA and co-activator AsiA

Activation of bacteriophage T4 middle promoters, which occurs about 1 min after infection, uses two phage-encoded factors that change the promoter specificity of the host RNA polymerase. These phage factors, the MotA activator and the AsiA co-activator, interact with theσ70specificity subunit ofEscherichia coliRNA polymerase, which normally contacts the −10 and −35 regions of host promoter DNA. Like host promoters, T4 middle promoters have a good match to the canonicalσ70DNA element located in the −10 region. However, instead of theσ70DNA recognition element in the promoter's −35 region, they have a 9 bp sequence (a MotA box) centred at −30, which is bound by MotA. Recent work has begun to provide information about the MotA/AsiA system at a detailed molecular level. Accumulated evidence suggests that the presence of MotA and AsiA reconfigures protein–DNA contacts in the upstream promoter sequences, without significantly affecting the contacts ofσ70with the −10 region. This type of activation, which is called ‘σappropriation’, is fundamentally different from other well-characterized models of prokaryotic activation in which an activator frequently serves to forceσ70to contact a less than ideal −35 DNA element. This review summarizes the interactions of AsiA and MotA withσ70, and discusses how these interactions accomplish the switch to T4 middle promoters by inhibiting the typical contacts of the C-terminal region ofσ70, region 4, with the host −35 DNA element and with other subunits of polymerase.

Transcription regulation by bacteriophage T4 AsiA

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA, a strong inhibitor of bacterial RNA polymerase, was the first antisigma protein to be discovered. Recent advances that made it possible to purify large amounts of this highly toxic protein led to an increased understanding of AsiA function and structure. In this review, we discuss how the small 10-KDa AsiA protein plays a key role in T4 development through its ability to both inhibit and activate bacterial RNA polymerase transcription.

A family of anti-sigma70 proteins in T4-type phages and bacteria that are similar to AsiA, a Transcription inhibitor and co-activator of bacteriophage T4

Anti-sigma70 factors interact with sigma70 proteins, the specificity subunits of prokaryotic RNA polymerase. The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma70 protein, AsiA, binds tightly to regions 4.1 and 4.2 of the sigma70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and inhibits transcription from sigma70 promoters that require recognition of the canonical sigma70 -35 DNA sequence. In the presence of the T4 transcription activator MotA, AsiA also functions as a co-activator of transcription from T4 middle promoters, which retain the canonical sigma70 -10 consensus sequence but have a MotA box sequence centered at -30 rather than the sigma70 -35 sequence. The E.coli anti-sigma70 protein Rsd also interacts with region 4.2 of sigma70 and inhibits transcription from sigma70 promoters. Our sequence comparisons of T4 AsiA with Rsd, with the predicted AsiA orthologs of the T4-type phages RB69, 44RR, KVP40, and Aeh1, and with AlgQ, a regulator of alginate production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa indicate that these proteins share conserved amino acid residues at positions known to be important for the binding of T4 AsiA to sigma70 region 4. We show that, like T4 AsiA, Rsd binds to sigma70 in a native protein gel and, as with T4 AsiA, a L18S substitution in Rsd disrupts this complex. Previous work has assigned sigma70 amino acid F563, within region 4.1, as a critical determinant for AsiA binding. This residue is also involved in the binding of sigma70 to the beta-flap of core, suggesting that AsiA inhibits transcription by disrupting the interaction between sigma70 region 4.1 and the beta-flap. We find that as with T4 AsiA, the interaction of KVP40 AsiA, Rsd, or AlgQ with sigma70 region 4 is diminished by the substitution F563Y. We also demonstrate that like T4 AsiA and Rsd, KVP40 AsiA inhibits transcription from sigma70-dependent promoters. We speculate that the phage AsiA orthologs, Rsd, and AlgQ are members of a related family in T4-type phage and bacteria, which interact similarly with primary sigma factors. In addition, we show that even though a clear MotA ortholog has not been identified in the KVP40 genome and the phage genome appears to lack typical middle promoter sequences, KVP40 AsiA activates transcription from T4 middle promoters in the presence of T4 MotA. We speculate that KVP40 encodes a protein that is dissimilar in sequence, but functionally equivalent, to T4 MotA.

Phage T4 early promoters are resistant to inhibition by the anti-sigma factor AsiA

Phage T4 early promoters are transcribed in vivo and in vitro by the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme Esigma(70). We studied in vitro the effects of the T4 anti-sigma(70) factor AsiA on the activity of several T4 early promoters. In single-round transcription, promoters motB, denV, mrh.2, motA wild type and UP element-deleted motA are strongly resistant to inhibition by AsiA. The alpha-C-terminal domain of Esigma(70) is crucial to this resistance. DNase I footprinting of Esigma(70) and Esigma(70)AsiA on motA and mrh.2 shows extended contacts between the holoenzyme with or without AsiA and upstream regions of these promoters. A TG --> TC mutation of the extended -10 motif in the motA UP element-deleted promoter strongly increases susceptibility to inhibition by AsiA, but has no effect on the motA wild-type promoter: either the UP element or the extended -10 site confers resistance to AsiA. Potassium permanganate reactivity shows that the two structure elements are not equivalent: with AsiA, the motA UP element-deleted promoter opens more slowly whereas the motA TC promoter opens like the wild type. Changes in UV laser photoreactivity at position +4 on variants of motA reveal an analogous distinction in the roles of the extended -10 and UP promoter elements.

T4 AsiA blocks DNA recognition by remodeling sigma70 region 4

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA is a versatile transcription factor capable of inhibiting host gene expression as an 'anti-sigma' factor while simultaneously promoting gene-specific expression of T4 middle genes in conjunction with T4 MotA. To accomplish this task, AsiA engages conserved region 4 of Eschericia coli sigma70, blocking recognition of most host promoters by sequestering the DNA-binding surface at the AsiA/sigma70 interface. The three-dimensional structure of an AsiA/region 4 complex reveals that the C-terminal alpha helix of region 4 is unstructured, while four other helices adopt a completely different conformation relative to the canonical structure of unbound region 4. That AsiA induces, rather than merely stabilizes, this rearrangement can be realized by comparison to the homologous structures of region 4 solved in a variety of contexts, including the structure of Thermotoga maritima sigmaA region 4 described herein. AsiA simultaneously occupies the surface of region 4 that ordinarily contacts core RNA polymerase (RNAP), suggesting that an AsiA-bound sigma70 may also undergo conformational changes in the context of the RNAP holoenzyme.

Bacteriophage-induced modifications of host RNA polymerase

Bacteriophages have developed an impressive array of ingenious mechanisms to modify bacterial host RNA polymerase to make it serve viral needs. In this review we summarize the current knowledge about two types of host RNA polymerase modifications induced by double-stranded DNA phages: covalent modifications and modifications through RNA polymerase-binding proteins. We interpret the biochemical and genetic data within the framework of a structure-function model of bacterial RNA polymerase and viral biology.

Characterization of the interactions between the bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein and RNA polymerase

The anti-sigma factor AsiA effects a change in promoter specificity of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase via interactions with two conserved regions of the sigma(70) subunit, denoted 4.1 and 4.2. Free AsiA is a symmetrical homodimer. Here, we show that AsiA is monomeric when bound to sigma(70) and that a subset of the residues that contribute to the homodimer interface also contributes to the interface with sigma(70). AsiA interacts primarily with C-terminal sections of regions 4.1 and 4.2, which show remarkable sequence similarity. An AsiA monomer can simultaneously, and apparently cooperatively, bind both isolated regions 4.1 and 4.2 at preferred, distinct subsites, whereas region 4.1 alone or region 4.2 alone can interact with either subsite. These results suggest structural and functional plasticity in the interaction of AsiA with sigma(70) and support the notion of discrete roles for regions 4.1 and 4.2 in transcription regulation by AsiA. Furthermore, we show that AsiA inhibits recognition of the -35 consensus promoter element by region 4 of sigma(70) indirectly, as the residues on region 4 responsible for AsiA binding are distinct from those involved in DNA binding. Finally, we show that AsiA must directly disrupt the interaction of region 4 with the RNA polymerase beta subunit flap domain, resulting in a distance change between region 2 and region 4 of sigma(70). Thus, a new paradigm for transcription regulation by AsiA is emerging, whereby the distance between the DNA binding domains in sigma(70) is regulated, and promoter recognition specificity is modulated, by mediating the interactions of the sigma region 4 with the beta subunit flap domain.

Escherichia coli SspA is a transcription activator for bacteriophage P1 late genes

The stringent starvation protein A (SspA), an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP)-associated protein, has been reported to be essential for lytic growth of bacteriophage P1. Unlike P1 early promoters, P1 late promoters are not recognized by RNAP alone. A phage-encoded early protein, Lpa (late promoter activator protein, formerly called gp10), has been shown to be required for P1 late transcription in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that SspA is a transcription activator for P1 late genes. Our results indicated that Lpa is not limiting in an sspA mutant. However, the transcription of P1 late genes was deficient in an sspA mutant in vivo. We demonstrated that SspA/Lpa are required for transcription activation of the P1 late promoter Ps in vitro. In addition, SspA and Lpa were shown to facilitate the binding of RNAP to Ps late promoter DNA. Activation of late transcription by SspA/Lpa was dependent on holoenzyme containing sigma70 but not sigmaS, indicating that the two activators discriminate between the two forms of the holoenzyme. Furthermore, P1 early gene expression was downregulated in the wild-type background, whereas it persisted in the sspA mutant background, indicating that SspA/Lpa mediate the transcriptional switch from the early to the late genes during P1 lytic growth. Thus, this work provides the first evidence for a function of the E. coli RNAP-associated protein SspA.

Twelve new MotA-dependent middle promoters of bacteriophage T4: consensus sequence revised

Bacteriophage T4 middle-mode transcription requires Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, phage-encoded transcriptional activator MotA and co-activator AsiA that form a complex at a middle promoter DNA. T4 middle promoters have been defined by a consensus sequence deduced from the list of 14 middle promoters identified in earlier studies. To date, 33 middle promoters have been mapped on the T4 genome. Of these, 12 contain differences even at the highly conserved positions of the consensus sequence. In the T4 prereplicative gene cluster between genes e and rpbA, we have identified 12 new middle promoters, most of which contain differences from the consensus sequence deduced previously. Analysis of base conservation in the different sequence positions of new middle promoters, as well as those identified previously, revealed some new features of middle T4 promoters. We propose to define these promoters by a MotA box (a/t)(a/t)(a/t)TGCTTtA centred at the position -30, the sequence TAtaAT centred at -10 relative to the transcriptional start site, and the spacer region of 12(+/-1) base-pairs between them.

Bacteriophage T4 genome

Phage T4 has provided countless contributions to the paradigms of genetics and biochemistry. Its complete genome sequence of 168,903 bp encodes about 300 gene products. T4 biology and its genomic sequence provide the best-understood model for modern functional genomics and proteomics. Variations on gene expression, including overlapping genes, internal translation initiation, spliced genes, translational bypassing, and RNA processing, alert us to the caveats of purely computational methods. The T4 transcriptional pattern reflects its dependence on the host RNA polymerase and the use of phage-encoded proteins that sequentially modify RNA polymerase; transcriptional activator proteins, a phage sigma factor, anti-sigma, and sigma decoy proteins also act to specify early, middle, and late promoter recognition. Posttranscriptional controls by T4 provide excellent systems for the study of RNA-dependent processes, particularly at the structural level. The redundancy of DNA replication and recombination systems of T4 reveals how phage and other genomes are stably replicated and repaired in different environments, providing insight into genome evolution and adaptations to new hosts and growth environments. Moreover, genomic sequence analysis has provided new insights into tail fiber variation, lysis, gene duplications, and membrane localization of proteins, while high-resolution structural determination of the "cell-puncturing device," combined with the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the baseplate, has revealed the mechanism of penetration during infection. Despite these advances, nearly 130 potential T4 genes remain uncharacterized. Current phage-sequencing initiatives are now revealing the similarities and differences among members of the T4 family, including those that infect bacteria other than Escherichia coli. T4 functional genomics will aid in the interpretation of these newly sequenced T4-related genomes and in broadening our understanding of the complex evolution and ecology of phages-the most abundant and among the most ancient biological entities on Earth.

Interaction of T4 AsiA with its target sites in the RNA polymerase sigma70 subunit leads to distinct and opposite effects on transcription

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA is a homodimeric protein that orchestrates a switch from the host and early viral transcription to middle viral transcription by binding to the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme (Esigma(70)) and preventing promoter complex formation on most E.coli and early T4 promoters. In addition, Esigma(70)AsiA, but not Esigma(70), is a substrate of transcription activation by T4-encoded DNA-binding protein MotA, a co-activator of transcription from middle viral promoters. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction necessary for transcription inhibition reside in the sigma(70) conserved region 4.2, which recognizes the -35 promoter consensus element. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction necessary for MotA-dependent transcription activation have not been identified. Here, we show that in the absence of sigma(70) region 4.2, AsiA interacts with sigma(70) conserved region 4.1 and activates transcription in a MotA-independent manner. Further, we show that the AsiA dimer must dissociate to interact with either region 4.2 or region 4.1 of sigma(70). We propose that MotA may co-activate transcription by restricting AsiA binding to sigma(70) region 4.1.

Analysis of regions within the bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein involved in its binding to the sigma70 subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase and its role as a transcriptional inhibitor and co-activator

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA, a protein of 90 amino acid residues, binds to the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and inhibits host or T4 early transcription or, together with the T4 MotA protein, activates T4 middle transcription. To investigate which regions within AsiA are involved in forming a complex with sigma(70) and in providing transcriptional functions we generated random mutations throughout AsiA and targeted mutations within the C-terminal region. We tested mutant proteins for their ability to complement the growth of T4 asiA am phage under non-suppressing conditions, to inhibit E. coli growth, to interact with sigma(70) region 4 in a two-hybrid assay, to bind to sigma(70) in a native protein gel, and to inhibit or activate transcription in vitro using a T4 middle promoter that is active with RNA polymerase alone, is inhibited by AsiA, and is activated by MotA/AsiA. We find that substitutions within the N-terminal half of AsiA, at amino acid residues V14, L18, and I40, rendered the protein defective for binding to sigma(70). These residues reside at the monomer-monomer interface in recent NMR structures of the AsiA dimer. In contrast, AsiA missing the C-terminal 44 amino acid residues interacted well with sigma(70) region 4 in the two-hybrid assay, and AsiA missing the C-terminal 17 amino acid residues (Delta74-90) bound to sigma(70) and was fully competent in standard in vitro transcription assays. However, the presence of the C-terminal region delayed formation of transcriptionally competent species when the AsiA/polymerase complex was pre-incubated with the promoter in the absence of MotA. Our results suggest that amino acid residues within the N-terminal half of AsiA are involved in forming or maintaining the AsiA/sigma(70) complex. The C-terminal region of AsiA, while not absolutely required for inhibition or co-activation, aids inhibition by slowing the formation of transcription complexes between a promoter and the AsiA/polymerase complex.

Mutational analysis of bacteriophage T4 AsiA: involvement of N- and C-terminal regions in binding to sigma(70) of Escherichia coli in vivo

The T4 AsiA is an anti-sigma factor encoded by an early gene of bacteriophage T4. AsiA has been shown to inhibit T4 early promoters in vitro and expression of this protein from a plasmid causes transcriptional shut off in the host cells leading to cell death. By reasoning that mutant AsiA expression in Escherichia coli will not inhibit the host transcription and hence lead to healthy colony formation, a strategy was developed wherein inactive or partially active mutants of AsiA could be isolated. These mutants were tested for their ability to bind to sigma(70) in vivo in E. coli, monitored as a relative toxicity assay, co-purification of sigma(70), inhibition of [3H-uridine] incorporation and also in the yeast two hybrid system. A good correlation was found between the loss of toxicity of AsiA to E. coli cells and the inability of mutant AsiAs to bind to sigma(70) It was observed that deletion of C-terminal 17 amino acid residues of AsiA did not affect the activity whereas a mutant asiA lacking C-terminal 28 amino acid residues had the toxicity reduced to a large extent, suggesting that amino acid residues between 64 and 73 played a role in binding to AsiA. A mutant with a deletion of 34 amino acids in the C-terminus did not show any toxicity to E. coli cells. In the N-terminal region, deletion of five amino acid residues was tolerated but extending the deletion to ten amino acids abolished the AsiA activity completely. The conversion of glutamic acid (E10) to either leucine, serine, glutamine, tyrosine or alanine did not affect the toxicity to a great extent suggesting that a negative charge at E10 is not critical for interaction with sigma(70). The results of our in vivo studies suggest that the primary sigma(70) binding site of AsiA is in N-terminus, but, it requires the presence of C-terminal 64-73 amino acid residues for effective binding in vivo.

The bacteriophage T4 transcription activator MotA interacts with the far-C-terminal region of the sigma70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Transcription from bacteriophage T4 middle promoters uses Escherichia coli RNA polymerase together with the T4 transcriptional activator MotA and the T4 coactivator AsiA. AsiA binds tightly within the C-terminal portion of the sigma70 subunit of RNA polymerase, while MotA binds to the 9-bp MotA box motif, which is centered at -30, and also interacts with sigma70. We show here that the N-terminal half of MotA (MotA(NTD)), which is thought to include the activation domain, interacts with the C-terminal region of sigma70 in an E. coli two-hybrid assay. Replacement of the C-terminal 17 residues of sigma70 with comparable sigma38 residues abolishes the interaction with MotA(NTD) in this assay, as does the introduction of the amino acid substitution R608C. Furthermore, in vitro transcription experiments indicate that a polymerase reconstituted with a sigma70 that lacks C-terminal amino acids 604 to 613 or 608 to 613 is defective for MotA-dependent activation. We also show that a proteolyzed fragment of MotA that contains the C-terminal half (MotA(CTD)) binds DNA with a K(D(app)) that is similar to that of full-length MotA. Our results support a model for MotA-dependent activation in which protein-protein contact between DNA-bound MotA and the far-C-terminal region of sigma70 helps to substitute functionally for an interaction between sigma70 and a promoter -35 element.

Snapshot of the genome of the pseudo-T-even bacteriophage RB49

RB49 is a virulent bacteriophage that infects Escherichia coli. Its virion morphology is indistinguishable from the well-known T-even phage T4, but DNA hybridization indicated that it was phylogenetically distant from T4 and thus it was classified as a pseudo-T-even phage. To further characterize RB49, we randomly sequenced small fragments corresponding to about 20% of the approximately 170-kb genome. Most of these nucleotide sequences lacked sufficient homology to T4 to be detected in an NCBI BlastN analysis. However, when translated, about 70% of them encoded proteins with homology to T4 proteins. Among these sequences were the numerous components of the virion and the phage DNA replication apparatus. Mapping the RB49 genes revealed that many of them had the same relative order found in the T4 genome. The complete nucleotide sequence was determined for the two regions of RB49 genome that contain most of the genes involved in DNA replication. This sequencing revealed that RB49 has homologues of all the essential T4 replication genes, but, as expected, their sequences diverged considerably from their T4 homologues. Many of the nonessential T4 genes are absent from RB49 and have been replaced by unknown sequences. The intergenic sequences of RB49 are less conserved than the coding sequences, and in at least some cases, RB49 has evolved alternative regulatory strategies. For example, an analysis of transcription in RB49 revealed a simpler pattern of regulation than in T4, with only two, rather than three, classes of temporally controlled promoters. These results indicate that RB49 and T4 have diverged substantially from their last common ancestor. The different T4-type phages appear to contain a set of common genes that can be exploited differently, by means of plasticity in the regulatory sequences and the precise choice of a large group of facultative genes.

Identification of two middle promoters upstream DNA ligase gene 30 of bacteriophage T4

Bacteriophage T4 DNA ligase gene 30 lies in the cluster of prereplicative genes located counterclockwise from map units 149 to 121. Based on the early transcription studies this gene has been considered as a typical early gene of bacteriophage T4. In agreement with this assignment, two strong T4 early promoters, P(E )30.8 (128.6) and P(E )30.7 (128.2), located about 3.1 and 2.7 kb upstream from gene 30 have been revealed by promoter mapping and sequence analysis. In addition, the existence of a putative early promoter just upstream of gene 30 was proposed from the sequence data. However, here we show that the putative early promoter just upstream of gene 30 is, in fact, a T4 middle promoter. Furthermore, we detected one more middle promoter located in the genomic region between early promoter P(E )30.7 (128.2) and DNA ligase gene 30 in the coding region of gene 30.3. Both new middle promoters have differences from the consensus MotA box, while their -10 regions match the sigma(70) consensus sequence very well. The 5' ends of MotA-dependent transcripts directed from these promoters, as well as the kinetics of 5' end accumulation in the cells, have been determined by primer extension analysis. The results of these analyses indicate that both MotA-dependent and MotA-independent promoters control the transcription of T4 DNA ligase gene 30 in vivo. Moreover, we show that the first transcripts for gene 30 are directed from its own middle promoter, P(M)30.

Solution structure and stability of the anti-sigma factor AsiA: implications for novel functions

Anti-sigma factors regulate prokaryotic gene expression through interactions with specific sigma factors. The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma factor AsiA is a molecular switch that both inhibits transcription from bacterial promoters and phage early promoters and promotes transcription at phage middle promoters through its interaction with the primary sigma factor of Escherichia coli, sigma(70). AsiA is an all-helical, symmetric dimer in solution. The solution structure of the AsiA dimer reveals a novel helical fold for the protomer. Furthermore, the AsiA protomer, surprisingly, contains a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, predicting a potential new role for AsiA. The AsiA dimer interface includes a substantial hydrophobic component, and results of hydrogen/deuterium exchange studies suggest that the dimer interface is the most stable region of the AsiA dimer. In addition, the residues that form the dimer interface are those that are involved in binding to sigma(70). The results promote a model whereby the AsiA dimer maintains the active hydrophobic surfaces and delivers them to sigma(70), where an AsiA protomer is displaced from the dimer via the interaction of sigma(70) with the same residues in AsiA that constitute the dimer interface.

Conserved regions 4.1 and 4.2 of sigma(70) constitute the recognition sites for the anti-sigma factor AsiA, and AsiA is a dimer free in solution

The association of the bacteriophage T4-encoded AsiA protein with the final sigma(70) subunit of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is one of the principal events governing transcription of the T4 genome. Analytical ultracentrifugation and NMR studies indicate that free AsiA is a symmetric dimer and the dimers can exchange subunits. Using NMR, the mutual recognition sites on AsiA and final sigma(70) have been elucidated. Residues throughout the N-terminal half of AsiA are involved either directly or indirectly in binding to final sigma(70) whereas the two highly conserved C-terminal regions of final sigma(70), denoted 4.1 and 4.2, constitute the entire AsiA binding domain. Peptides corresponding to these regions bind tightly to AsiA individually and simultaneously. Simultaneous binding promotes structural changes in AsiA that mimic interaction with the complete AsiA binding determinant of final sigma(70). Moreover, the results suggest that a significant rearrangement of the dimer accompanies peptide binding. Thus, both conserved regions 4.1 and 4.2 are intimately involved in recognition of AsiA by final sigma(70). The interaction of AsiA with 4.1 provides a potential explanation of the differential abilities of DNA and AsiA to bind to free final sigma(70) and a mechanistic alternative to models of AsiA function that rely on binding to a single site on final sigma(70).

The Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.anti-sigma 70 AsiA complex utilizes alpha-carboxyl-terminal domain upstream promoter contacts to transcribe from a -10/-35 promoter

During infection of Escherichia coli, the phage T4 early protein AsiA inhibits open complex formation by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme Efinal sigma(70) at -10/-35 bacterial promoters through binding to region 4.2 of the final sigma(70) subunit. We used the -10/-35 lacUV5 promoter to study the properties of the Efinal sigma(70). AsiA complex in the presence of the glutamate anion. Under these experimental conditions, inhibition by AsiA was significantly decreased. KMnO(4) probing showed that the observed residual transcriptional activity was due to the slow transformation of the ternary complex Efinal sigma(70). AsiA.lacUV5 into an open complex. In agreement with this observation, affinity of the enzyme for the promoter was 10-fold lower in the ternary complex than in the binary complex Efinal sigma(70).lacUV5. A tau plot analysis of abortive transcription reactions showed that AsiA binding to Efinal sigma(70) resulted in a 120-fold decrease in the second-order on-rate constant of the reaction of Efinal sigma(70) with lacUV5 and a 55-fold decrease in the rate constant of the isomerization step leading to the open complex. This ternary complex still responded to activation by the cAMP.catabolite activator protein complex. We show that compensatory Efinal sigma(70)/promoter upstream contacts involving the C-terminal domains of alpha subunits in Efinal sigma(70) become essential for the binding of Efinal sigma(70). AsiA to the lacUV5 promoter.

Mapping the molecular interface between the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase and T4 AsiA

Bacteriophage T4 antisigma protein AsiA (10 kDa) orchestrates a switch from the host and early viral transcription to middle viral transcription by binding to the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA complex formation are not known. Here, we used combinatorial peptide chemistry, protein-protein crosslinking, and mutational analysis to study the interaction between AsiA and its target, the 33 amino acid residues-long sigma(70) peptide containing conserved region 4.2. Many region 4.2 amino acid residues contact AsiA, which likely completely occludes the DNA-binding surface of region 4.2. Though none of region 4.2 amino acid residues is singularly responsible for the very tight interaction with AsiA, sigma(70) Lys593 and Arg596 which lie outside the putative DNA recognition element of region 4.2, contribute the most. In AsiA, the first 20 amino acid residues are both necessary and sufficient for interactions with sigma(70). Our results clarify details of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction and open the way for engineering AsiA derivatives with altered specificities.

The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma factor AsiA is not necessary for the inhibition of early promoters in vivo

Bacteriophage T4 early promoters are utilized immediately after infection and are abruptly turned off 2-3 min later (at 30 degrees C) when the middle promoters are activated. The viral early protein AsiA has been suspected to bring about this transcriptional switch: not only does it activate transcription at middle promoters in vivo and in vitro but it also shows potent anti-sigma70 activity in vitro, suggesting that it is responsible for the shut-off of early transcription. We show here that after infection with a phage deleted for the asiA gene the inhibition of early transcription occurs to the same extent and with the same kinetics as in a wild-type infection. Thus, another AsiA-independent circuit efficiently turns off early transcription. The association of a mutation in asiA with a mutation in mod, rpbA, motA or motB has no effect on the inhibition of early promoters, showing that none of these phage-encoded transcriptional regulators is necessary for AsiA-independent shut-off. It is not known whether AsiA is able to inhibit early promoters in vivo, but host transcription is strongly inhibited in vivo upon induction of AsiA from a multicopy plasmid.

Study of the interaction between bacteriophage T4 asiA and Escherichia coli sigma(70), using the yeast two-hybrid system: neutralization of asiA toxicity to E. coli cells by coexpression of a truncated sigma(70) fragment

The interaction of T4 phage-encoded anti-sigma factor, asiA, and Escherichia coli sigma(70) was studied by using the yeast two-hybrid system. Truncation of sigma(70) to identify the minimum region involved in the interaction showed that the fragment containing amino acid residues proximal to the C terminus (residues 547 to 603) was sufficient for complexing to asiA. Studies also indicated that some of the truncated C-terminal fragments (residues 493 to 613) had higher affinity for asiA as judged by the increased beta-galactosidase activity. It is proposed that the observed higher affinity may be due to the unmasking of the binding region of asiA on the sigma protein. Advantage was taken of the increased affinity of truncated sigma(70) fragments to asiA in designing a coexpression system wherein the toxicity of asiA expression in E. coli could be neutralized and the complex of truncated sigma(70) and asiA could be expressed in large quantities and purified.

Sigma competition: the contest between bacteriophage T4 middle and late transcription

In bacterial transcription, diverse sigma-family promoter recognition proteins compete for a common RNA polymerase core. Bacteriophage T4 infection ultimately reduces this competition to a duel between activated viral middle and enhanced late transcription, involving two sigma proteins, two phage-encoded activator proteins and two phage-specific co-activators. This competition has been analyzed in vitro, and the relative abundances in T4-infected Escherichia coli of the participating proteins have been measured. Activated late transcription holds an advantage over activated middle transcription, especially at higher ionic strength. This advantage is further compounded by ADP-ribosylation of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits, and by the phage-specific, RNA polymerase core-bound RpbA subunit. The largest contribution to the middle-late competition is made by gp55, the late sigma factor, but not enough of gp55 is produced during T4 infection to shut off middle transcription by direct competition with sigma(70). AsiA, the originally identified anti-sigma protein is not a major determinant of middle-late competition.

Transcriptional organization and in vivo role of the Escherichia coli rsd gene, encoding the regulator of RNA polymerase sigma D

The regulator of sigma D (Rsd) was identified as an RNA polymerase sigma70-associated protein in stationary-phase Escherichia coli with the inhibitory activity of sigma70-dependent transcription in vitro (M. Jishage and A. Ishihama, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4953-4958, 1998). Primer extension analysis of rsd mRNA indicated the presence of two promoters, sigmaS-dependent P1 and sigma70-dependent P2 with the gearbox sequence. To get insight into the in vivo role of Rsd, the expression of a reporter gene fused to either the sigma70- or sigmaS-dependent promoter was analyzed in the absence of Rsd or the presence of overexpressed Rsd. In the rsd null mutant, the sigma70- and sigmaS-dependent gene expression was increased or decreased, respectively. On the other hand, the sigma70- or sigmaS-dependent transcription was reduced or enhanced, respectively, after overexpression of Rsd. The repression of the sigmaS-dependent transcription in the rsd mutant is overcome by increased production of the sigmaS subunit. Together these observations support the prediction that Rsd is involved in replacement of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit from sigma70 to sigmaS during the transition from exponential growth to the stationary phase.

The bacteriophage T4 transcriptional activator MotA accepts various base-pair changes within its binding sequence

During infection, bacteriophage T4 regulates three sets of genes: early, middle, and late. The host RNA polymerase is capable of transcribing early genes, but middle transcription requires the T4-encoded transcriptional activator, MotA protein, and the T4 co-activator, AsiA protein, both of which bind to the sigma 70 (sigma70) subunit of RNA polymerase. MotA also binds a DNA sequence (a MotA box), centered at position -30. The identification of more than 20 middle promoters suggested that a strong match to the MotA box consensus sequence (t/a)(t/a)TGCTT(t/c)A was critical for MotA activation. We have investigated how specific base changes within the MotA box sequence affect MotA binding and activation in vitro, and we have identified seven new middle promoters in vivo. We find that an excellent match to the sigma70 -10 consensus sequence, rather than an excellent match to the MotA box consensus sequence, is an invariant feature of MotA-dependent promoters. Many single base changes in the MotA box are tolerated in binding and activation assays, indicating that there is more flexibility in the sequence requirements for MotA than was previously appreciated. We also find that using the natural T4 DNA, which contains glucosylated, 5-hydoxymethylated cytosine residues, affects the ability of particular MotA box sequences to activate transcription. We suggest that MotA and AsiA may function like certain eukaryotic TAFs (TATA binding protein (TBP) associated factors) whose binding to TBP results in transcription from new core promoter sequences.

The anti-sigma factors

A mechanism for regulating gene expression at the level of transcription utilizes an antagonist of the sigma transcription factor known as the anti-sigma (anti-sigma) factor. The cytoplasmic class of anti-sigma factors has been well characterized. The class includes AsiA form bacteriophage T4, which inhibits Escherichia coli sigma 70; FlgM, present in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, which inhibits the flagella sigma factor sigma 28; SpoIIAB, which inhibits the sporulation-specific sigma factor, sigma F and sigma G, of Bacillus subtilis; RbsW of B. subtilis, which inhibits stress response sigma factor sigma B; and DnaK, a general regulator of the heat shock response, which in bacteria inhibits the heat shock sigma factor sigma 32. In addition to this class of well-characterized cytoplasmic anti-sigma factors, a new class of homologous, inner-membrane-bound anti-sigma factors has recently been discovered in a variety of eubacteria. This new class of anti-sigma factors regulates the expression of so-called extracytoplasmic functions, and hence is known as the ECF subfamily of anti-sigma factors. The range of cell processes regulated by anti-sigma factors is highly varied and includes bacteriophage phage growth, sporulation, stress response, flagellar biosynthesis, pigment production, ion transport, and virulence.

Stimulation of bacteriophage T4 middle transcription by the T4 proteins MotA and AsiA occurs at two distinct steps in the transcription cycle

The bacteriophage T4 encodes proteins that are responsible for tightly regulating mRNA synthesis throughout phage development in Escherichia coli. The three classes of T4 promoters (early, middle, and late) are utilized sequentially by the host RNA polymerase as a result of phage-induced modifications. One such modification is the tight binding of the T4 AsiA protein to the sigma70 subunit of the RNA polymerase. This interaction is pivotal for the transition between T4 early and middle transcription, since it both inhibits recognition of host and T4 early promoters and stimulates T4 middle mode synthesis. The activation of T4 middle transcription also requires the T4 MotA protein, bound specifically to its recognition sequence, the "Mot box," which is centered at position -30 of these promoters. Accordingly, the two T4 proteins working in concert are sufficient to effectively switch the transcription specificity of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Herein, we investigate the mechanism of transcription activation and report that, while the presence of MotA and AsiA increases the initial recruitment of RNA polymerase to a T4 middle promoter, it does not alter the intrinsic stability of the discrete complexes formed. In addition, we have characterized the RNA polymerase-promoter species by UV laser footprinting and followed their evolution from open into initiating complexes. These data, combined with in vitro transcription assays, indicate that AsiA and MotA facilitate promoter escape, thereby stimulating the production of full-length transcripts.

The flagellar anti-sigma factor FlgM actively dissociates Salmonella typhimurium sigma28 RNA polymerase holoenzyme

The anti-sigma factor FlgM of Salmonella typhimurium inhibits transcription of class 3 flagellar genes through a direct interaction with the flagellar-specific sigma factor, sigma28. FlgM is believed to prevent RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme formation by sequestering free sigma28. We have analyzed FlgM-mediated inhibition of sigma28 activity in vitro. FlgM is able to inhibit sigma28 activity even when sigma28 is first allowed to associate with core RNAP. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was used to evaluate the interaction between FlgM and both sigma28 and sigma28 holoenzyme (Esigma28). The Kd of the sigma28-FlgM complex is approximately 2 x 10(-10) M; missense mutations in FlgM that cause a defect in sigma28 inhibition in vivo increase the Kd of this interaction by 4- to 10-fold. SPR measurements of Esigma28 dissociation in the presence of FlgM indicate that FlgM destabilizes Esigma28, presumably via an interaction with the sigma subunit. Our data provide the first direct evidence of an interaction between FlgM and Esigma28. We propose that this secondary activity of FlgM, which we term holoenzyme destabilization, enhances the sensitivity of the cell to changes in FlgM levels during flagellar biogenesis.

Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T4 AsiA

The 10 kDa bacteriophage T4 antisigma protein AsiA binds the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase promoter specificity subunit, sigma 70, with high affinity and inhibits its transcription activity. AsiA binds to sigma 70 primarily through an interaction with sigma 70 conserved region 4.2, which has also been implicated in sequence-specific recognition of the -35 consensus promoter element. Here we show that AsiA forms a stable ternary complex with core RNA polymerase (RNAP) and sigma 70 and thus does not inhibit sigma 70 activity by preventing its binding to core RNAP. We investigated the effect of AsiA on open promoter complex formation and abortive initiation at two -10/-35 type promoters and two "extended -10" promoters. Our results indicate that the binding of AsiA to sigma 70 and the interaction of sigma 70 region 4.2 with the -35 consensus promoter element of -10/-35 promoters is mutually exclusive. In contrast, AsiA has much less effect on open promoter complex formation and abortive initiation from extended -10 promoters, which lack a -35 consensus element and do not require sigma 70 conserved region 4.2. From these results we conclude that T4 AsiA inhibits E. coli RNAP sigma 70 holoenzyme transcription at -10/-35 promoters by interfering with the required interaction between sigma 70 conserved region 4.2 and the -35 consensus promoter element.

The interaction between the AsiA protein of bacteriophage T4 and the sigma70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

The AsiA protein of bacteriophage T4 binds to the sigma70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and plays a dual regulatory role during T4 development: (i) inhibition of host and phage early transcription, and (ii) coactivation of phage middle-mode transcription, which also requires the T4 DNA binding transcriptional activator, MotA. We report that the interaction between AsiA and sigma70 occurs with a 1:1 stoichiometry. When preincubated with RNA polymerase, AsiA is a potent inhibitor of open complex formation at the lac UV5 promoter, whereas it does not perturb preformed open or intermediate promoter complexes. DNase I footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift analyses of RNA polymerase-DNA complexes formed at the T4 early promoter P15.0 show that AsiA blocks the initial RNA polymerase binding step that leads to the formation of specific closed promoter complexes. A contrasting result is obtained on the T4 middle promoter PrIIB2, where AsiA stimulates the formation of both closed complexes and open complexes. Therefore, we propose that AsiA modulates initial DNA binding by the RNA polymerase, switching promoter usage at the level of closed complex formation.

The activation domain of the MotA transcription factor from bacteriophage T4

Bacteriophage T4 encodes a transcription factor, MotA, that binds to the -30 region of middle-mode promoters and activates transcription by host RNA polymerase. We have solved the structure of the MotA activation domain to 2.2 A by X-ray crystallography, and have also determined its secondary structure by NMR. An area on the surface of the protein has a distinctive patch that is populated with acidic and hydrophobic residues. Mutations within this patch cause a defective T4 growth phenotype, arguing that the patch is important for MotA function. One of the mutant MotA activation domains was purified and analyzed by NMR, and the spectra clearly show that the domain is properly folded. The mutant full-length protein appears to bind DNA normally but is deficient in transcriptional activation. We conclude that the acidic/hydrophobic surface patch is specifically involved in transcriptional activation, which is reminiscent of eukaryotic acidic activation domains.

Post-transcriptional controls in bacteriophage T4: roles of the sequence-specific endoribonuclease RegB

Gene regB of bacteriophage T4 encodes a sequence-specific endoribonuclease which introduces cuts in early phage messenger RNAs. In most cases, cutting takes place in the middle of the tetranucleotide GGAG. Efficient cleavages occur in the motifs located in intergenic regions, some of them being Shine-Dalgarno sequences. When located in a coding sequence, this tetranucleotide is poorly recognized or not at all. In this article, we have reviewed the properties of the RegB endoribonuclease, with emphasis on its possible roles in T4 development. We show that the nuclease RegB plays at least two roles: (i) it inactivates a sub-class of early mRNA by cleaving Shine-Dalgarno sequences, and (ii) it is necessary for the degradation of early mRNAs, but not of middle and late mRNAs. Accordingly, we found that middle and late mRNAs avoid processing by RegB, probably for different reasons. Most of the middle mRNAs (mRNAs initiated at MotA-dependent promoters) do not contain the motif GGAG in their intergenic regions, whereas about one-third of the late genes have this motif as Shine-Dalgarno sequence. It is not yet known whether the RNase is inactivated early in the phage cycle, or whether it remains active but cannot recognize late mRNAs as substrates.

Multiple initiation mechanisms adapt phage T4 DNA replication to physiological changes during T4's development

We summarize the evidence for multiple pathways to initiate phage T4 DNA replication. In any infecting chromosome, leading DNA strands can be primed from pre-replicative transcripts, independent of primase activity, at one of several origins. Within each origin region, there are multiple RNA-DNA transition sites. However, the priming potential at each single site is very low. Our results suggest that origin transcripts can become primers for leading strand DNA synthesis without being processed, but that a promoter-proximal segment of each origin transcript plays an important structural role, as a proposed wedge, in the transition from RNA to DNA synthesis. Two recombination-dependent pathways render subsequent phage T4 DNA replication independent of transcription. The first of these requires proteins that are synthesized during the pre-replicative phase of infection. It is active as soon as the first growing points, initiated at origins, have reached a chromosomal end. The other one requires at least one late protein: endonuclease VII, a resolvase that cuts recombinational junctions. The latter pathway can bypass primase deficiencies by allowing retrograde DNA synthesis without Okazaki pieces. We discuss the integration of these multiple and redundant pathways into the developmental program of T4. Competition between these initiation mechanisms and with other DNA transactions allows for integration of replication controls with transcription, recombination and packaging of the DNA.

The COOH-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in transcriptional enhancement and deactivation at the bacteriophage T4 late promoter

Many activator proteins generate their positive control of transcription through interactions with the COOH-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit. We have examined the participation of this alpha-domain in transcriptional enhancement and suppression at bacteriophage T4 late promoters. Enhancement is generated by the T4 gene 45 protein, which is the DNA-tracking processivity factor of viral DNA replication; suppression of unenhanced transcription is generated by the RNA polymerase-binding co-activator T4 gene 33 protein. Enhanced and unenhanced transcription by RNA polymerase reconstituted with intact and truncated alpha subunits and by RNA polymerase containing ADP-ribosylated alpha has been compared; the internal structures of transcription complexes formed with these RNA polymerases have also been analyzed by footprinting and photocross-linking. Comparison of these structural and functional analyses suggests that enhancement of T4 late transcription by gp45 is not compatible with any significant role of the COOH-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase core alpha subunit in transcriptional initiation. Suppression of unenhanced T4 late transcription by the gene 33 protein also does not require the COOH-terminal domain of alpha.

The role of anti-sigma factors in gene regulation

Despite the isolation of an anti-sigma factor over 20 years ago, it is only recently that the concept of an anti-sigma factor emerged as a general mechanism of transcriptional regulation in prokaryotic systems. Anti-sigma factors bind to sigma factors and inhibit their transcriptional activity. Studies on the mechanism of action of anti-sigma factors has shed new light on the regulation of gene expression in bacteria, as the anti-sigma factors add another layer to transcriptional control via negative regulation. Their cellular roles are as diverse as FIgM of Salmonella typhimurium, which can be exported to sense the structural state of the flagellar organelle, to SpoIIAB of Bacillus subtilis participating in the switch from one cell type to another during the process of sporulation. Additionally, the bacteriophage T4 uses an anti-sigma factor to sabotage the Escherichia coli E.sigma 70 RNA polymerase in order to direct exclusive transcription of its own genes. Cross-linking, co-immunoprecipitations, and co-purification indicate that the anti-sigma factors directly interact with their corresponding sigma factor to negatively regulate transcription. In B. subtilis, anti anti-sigma factors regulate anti-sigma factors by preventing an anti-sigma factor from interacting with its cognate sigma factors, thereby allowing transcription to occur.