Repression of the Klebsiella aerogenes nac promoter

Synonymous codon substitutions modulate transcription and translation of a divergent upstream gene by modulating antisense RNA production

Synonymous codons were originally viewed as interchangeable, with no phenotypic consequences. However, substantial evidence has now demonstrated that synonymous substitutions can perturb a variety of gene expression and protein homeostasis mechanisms, including translational efficiency, translational fidelity, and cotranslational folding of the encoded protein. To date, most studies of synonymous codon-derived perturbations have focused on effects within a single gene. Here, we show that synonymous codon substitutions made far within the coding sequence of Escherichia coli plasmid-encoded chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) can significantly increase expression of the divergent upstream tetracycline resistance gene, tetR. In four out of nine synonymously recoded cat sequences tested, expression of the upstream tetR gene was significantly elevated due to transcription of a long antisense RNA (asRNA) originating from a transcription start site within cat. Surprisingly, transcription of this asRNA readily bypassed the native tet transcriptional repression mechanism. Even more surprisingly, accumulation of the TetR protein correlated with the level of asRNA, rather than total tetR RNA. These effects of synonymous codon substitutions on transcription and translation of a neighboring gene suggest that synonymous codon usage in bacteria may be under selection to both preserve the amino acid sequence of the encoded gene and avoid DNA sequence elements that can significantly perturb expression of neighboring genes. Avoiding such sequences may be especially important in plasmids and prokaryotic genomes, where genes and regulatory elements are often densely packed. Similar considerations may apply to the design of genetic circuits for synthetic biology applications.

Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters

Transcriptional enhancers play a key role in the initiation and maintenance of gene expression programmes, particularly in metazoa. How these elements control their target genes in the right place and time is one of the most pertinent questions in functional genomics, with wide implications for most areas of biology. Here, we synthesise classic and recent evidence on the regulatory logic of enhancers, including the principles of enhancer organisation, factors that facilitate and delimit enhancer-promoter communication, and the joint effects of multiple enhancers. We show how modern approaches building on classic insights have begun to unravel the complexity of enhancer-promoter relationships, paving the way towards a quantitative understanding of gene control.

Negative Autogenous Control of the Master Type III Secretion System Regulator HrpL in Pseudomonas syringae

The type III secretion system (T3SS) is a principal virulence determinant of the model bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae T3SS effector proteins inhibit plant defense signaling pathways in susceptible hosts and elicit evolved immunity in resistant plants. The extracytoplasmic function sigma factor HrpL coordinates the expression of most T3SS genes. Transcription of hrpL is dependent on sigma-54 and the codependent enhancer binding proteins HrpR and HrpS for hrpL promoter activation. hrpL is oriented adjacently to and divergently from the HrpL-dependent gene hrpJ, sharing an intergenic upstream regulatory region. We show that association of the RNA polymerase (RNAP)-HrpL complex with the hrpJ promoter element imposes negative autogenous control on hrpL transcription in P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000. The hrpL promoter was upregulated in a ΔhrpL mutant and was repressed by plasmid-borne hrpL In a minimal Escherichia coli background, the activity of HrpL was sufficient to achieve repression of reconstituted hrpL transcription. This repression was relieved if both the HrpL DNA-binding function and the hrp-box sequence of the hrpJ promoter were compromised, implying dependence upon the hrpJ promoter. DNA-bound RNAP-HrpL entirely occluded the HrpRS and partially occluded the integration host factor (IHF) recognition elements of the hrpL promoter in vitro, implicating inhibition of DNA binding by these factors as a cause of negative autogenous control. A modest increase in the HrpL concentration caused hypersecretion of the HrpA1 pilus protein but intracellular accumulation of later T3SS substrates. We argue that negative feedback on HrpL activity fine-tunes expression of the T3SS regulon to minimize the elicitation of plant defenses.

IMPORTANCE

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization has warned that agriculture will need to satisfy a 50% to 70% increase in global food demand if the human population reaches 9 billion by 2050 as predicted. However, diseases caused by microbial pathogens represent a major threat to food security, accounting for over 10% of estimated yield losses in staple wheat, rice, and maize crops. Understanding the decision-making strategies employed by pathogens to coordinate virulence and to evade plant defenses is vital for informing crop resistance traits and management strategies. Many plant-pathogenic bacteria utilize the needle-like T3SS to inject virulence factors into host plant cells to suppress defense signaling. Pseudomonas syringae is an economically and environmentally devastating plant pathogen. We propose that the master regulator of its entire T3SS gene set, HrpL, downregulates its own expression to minimize elicitation of plant defenses. Revealing such conserved regulatory strategies will inform future antivirulence strategies targeting plant pathogens.

Mechanism of Antiactivation at the Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP σN-Dependent PatzT Promoter

PatzT is an internal promoter of the atzRSTUVW operon that directs the synthesis of AtzT, AtzU, AtzV, and AtzW, components of an ABC-type cyanuric acid transport system. PatzT is σ(N) dependent, activated by the general nitrogen control regulator NtrC with the assistance of protein integration host factor (IHF), and repressed by the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) AtzR. We have used a variety of in vivo and in vitro gene expression and protein-DNA interaction assays to assess the mechanisms underlying AtzR-dependent repression of PatzT Here, we show that repression only occurs when AtzR and NtrC interact simultaneously with the PatzT promoter region, indicating that AtzR acts as an antiactivator to antagonize activation by NtrC. Furthermore, repression requires precise rotational orientation of the AtzR and NtrC binding sites, strongly suggesting protein-protein interaction between the two proteins on the promoter region. Further exploration of the antiactivation mechanism showed that although AtzR-dependent repression occurs prior to open complex formation, AtzR does not alter the oligomerization state of NtrC or inhibit NtrC ATPase activity when bound to the PatzT promoter region. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that PatzT-bound AtzR interacts with NtrC to prevent the coupling of NtrC-mediated ATP hydrolysis with the remodeling of the interactions between E-σ(N) and PatzT that lead to open complex formation.

IMPORTANCE

Here, we describe a unique mechanism by which the regulatory protein AtzR prevents the activation of the σ(N)-dependent promoter PatzT Promoters of this family are always positively regulated, but there are a few examples of overlapping negative regulation. The mechanism described here is highly unconventional and involves an interaction between the repressor and activator proteins to prevent the action of the repressor protein on the RNA polymerase-promoter complex.

Using synthetic bacterial enhancers to reveal a looping-based mechanism for quenching-like repression

We explore a model for 'quenching-like' repression by studying synthetic bacterial enhancers, each characterized by a different binding site architecture. To do so, we take a three-pronged approach: first, we compute the probability that a protein-bound dsDNA molecule will loop. Second, we use hundreds of synthetic enhancers to test the model's predictions in bacteria. Finally, we verify the mechanism bioinformatically in native genomes. Here we show that excluded volume effects generated by DNA-bound proteins can generate substantial quenching. Moreover, the type and extent of the regulatory effect depend strongly on the relative arrangement of the binding sites. The implications of these results are that enhancers should be insensitive to 10-11 bp insertions or deletions (INDELs) and sensitive to 5-6 bp INDELs. We test this prediction on 61 σ(54)-regulated qrr genes from the Vibrio genus and confirm the tolerance of these enhancers' sequences to the DNA's helical repeat.

The Treponema denticola AtcR LytTR domain-containing response regulator interacts with three architecturally distinct promoter elements: implications for understanding the molecular signaling mechanisms that drive the progression of periodontal disease

Treponema denticola is an oral spirochete and periopathogen that transitions from low abundance in healthy subgingival crevices to high abundance in periodontal pockets. The T. denticola response regulator AtcR harbors the relatively rare, LytTR DNA-binding domain. LytTR domain containing response regulators control critical transcriptional responses required for environmental adaptation. Using a multi-step bioinformatics approach, 26 strong lytTR recognition motifs were identified in the genome of T. denticola strain 35405. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that AtcR binds to these recognition motifs. High specificity-high affinity complexes formed with phosphorylated AtcR. The LytTR recognition sequences were found to exist in three distinct promoter architectures designated as LytTR1, LytTR2 and LytTR3 promoters. LytTR1 and LytTR2 promoters harbor σ(54) binding sites. The functional diversity of the proteins encoded by the putative AtcR regulon suggests that AtcR sits at the top of a regulatory cascade that plays a central role in facilitating T. denticola's ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions and thrive in periodontal pockets.

Nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli: putting molecular data into a systems perspective

We present a comprehensive overview of the hierarchical network of intracellular processes revolving around central nitrogen metabolism in Escherichia coli. The hierarchy intertwines transport, metabolism, signaling leading to posttranslational modification, and transcription. The protein components of the network include an ammonium transporter (AmtB), a glutamine transporter (GlnHPQ), two ammonium assimilation pathways (glutamine synthetase [GS]-glutamate synthase [glutamine 2-oxoglutarate amidotransferase {GOGAT}] and glutamate dehydrogenase [GDH]), the two bifunctional enzymes adenylyl transferase/adenylyl-removing enzyme (ATase) and uridylyl transferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (UTase), the two trimeric signal transduction proteins (GlnB and GlnK), the two-component regulatory system composed of the histidine protein kinase nitrogen regulator II (NRII) and the response nitrogen regulator I (NRI), three global transcriptional regulators called nitrogen assimilation control (Nac) protein, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), and cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (Crp), the glutaminases, and the nitrogen-phosphotransferase system. First, the structural and molecular knowledge on these proteins is reviewed. Thereafter, the activities of the components as they engage together in transport, metabolism, signal transduction, and transcription and their regulation are discussed. Next, old and new molecular data and physiological data are put into a common perspective on integral cellular functioning, especially with the aim of resolving counterintuitive or paradoxical processes featured in nitrogen assimilation. Finally, we articulate what still remains to be discovered and what general lessons can be learned from the vast amounts of data that are available now.

The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized activators of σ54-dependent transcription

Bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBPs) are transcriptional activators that assemble as hexameric rings in their active forms and utilize ATP hydrolysis to remodel the conformation of RNA polymerase containing the alternative sigma factor σ(54). We present a comprehensive and detailed summary of recent advances in our understanding of how these specialized molecular machines function. The review is structured by introducing each of the three domains in turn: the central catalytic domain, the N-terminal regulatory domain, and the C-terminal DNA binding domain. The role of the central catalytic domain is presented with particular reference to (i) oligomerization, (ii) ATP hydrolysis, and (iii) the key GAFTGA motif that contacts σ(54) for remodeling. Each of these functions forms a potential target of the signal-sensing N-terminal regulatory domain, which can act either positively or negatively to control the activation of σ(54)-dependent transcription. Finally, we focus on the DNA binding function of the C-terminal domain and the enhancer sites to which it binds. Particular attention is paid to the importance of σ(54) to the bacterial cell and its unique role in regulating transcription.

Transcriptional organization and regulatory elements of a Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP operon encoding a LysR-type regulator and a putative solute transport system

The atzS-atzT-atzU-atzV-atzW gene cluster of the Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP atrazine-degradative plasmid pADP-1, which carries genes for an outer membrane protein and the components of a putative ABC-type solute transporter, is located downstream from atzR, which encodes the LysR-type transcriptional regulator of the cyanuric acid-degradative operon atzDEF. Here we describe the transcriptional organization of these genes. Our results show that all six genes are cotranscribed from the PatzR promoter to form the atzRSTUVW operon. A second, stronger promoter, PatzT, is found within atzS and directs transcription of the four distal genes. PatzT is σ(N) dependent, activated by NtrC in response to nitrogen limitation with the aid of IHF, and repressed by AtzR. A combination of in vivo mutational analysis and primer extension allowed us to locate the PatzT promoter and map the transcriptional start site. Similarly, we used deletion and point mutation analyses, along with in vivo expression studies and in vitro binding assays, to locate the NtrC, IHF, and AtzR binding sites and address their functionality. Our results suggest a regulatory model in which NtrC activates PatzT transcription via DNA looping, while AtzR acts as an antiactivator that diminishes expression by interfering with the activation process.

Transcriptional regulation of the gene cluster encoding allantoinase and guanine deaminase in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Purines can be used as the sole source of nitrogen by several strains of K. pneumoniae under aerobic conditions. The genes responsible for the assimilation of purine nitrogens are distributed in three separated clusters in the K. pneumoniae genome. Here, we characterize the cluster encompassing genes KPN_01787 to KPN_01791, which is involved in the conversion of allantoin into allantoate and in the deamination of guanine to xanthine. These genes are organized in three transcriptional units, hpxSAB, hpxC, and guaD. Gene hpxS encodes a regulatory protein of the GntR family that mediates regulation of this system by growth on allantoin. Proteins encoded by hpxB and guaD display allantoinase and guanine deaminase activity, respectively. In this cluster, hpxSAB is the most tightly regulated unit. This operon was activated by growth on allantoin as a nitrogen source; however, addition of allantoin to nitrogen excess cultures did not result in hpxSAB induction. Neither guaD nor hpxC was induced by allantoin. Expression of guaD is mainly regulated by nitrogen availability through the action of NtrC. Full induction of hpxSAB by allantoin requires both HpxS and NAC. HpxS may have a dual role, acting as a repressor in the absence of allantoin and as an activator in its presence. HpxS binds to tandem sites, S1 and S2, overlapping the -10 and -35 sequences of the hpxSAB promoter, respectively. The NAC binding site is located between S1 and S2 and partially overlaps S2. In the presence of allantoin, interplay between NAC and HpxS is proposed.

Signal sensory systems that impact σ⁵⁴ -dependent transcription

Alternative σ-factors of bacteria bind core RNA polymerase to program the specific promoter selectivity of the holoenzyme. Signal-responsive changes in the availability of different σ-factors redistribute the RNA polymerase among the distinct promoter classes in the genome for appropriate adaptive, developmental and survival responses. The σ(54) -factor is structurally and functionally distinct from all other σ-factors. Consequently, binding of σ(54) to RNA polymerase confers unique features on the cognate holoenzyme, which requires activation by an unusual class of mechano-transcriptional activators, whose activities are highly regulated in response to environmental cues. This review summarizes the current understanding of the mechanisms of transcriptional activation by σ(54) -RNA polymerase and highlights the impact of global regulatory factors on transcriptional efficiency from σ(54) -dependent promoters. These global factors include the DNA-bending proteins IHF and CRP, the nucleotide alarmone ppGpp, and the RNA polymerase-targeting protein DksA.

Genetic analysis of the nitrogen assimilation control protein from Klebsiella pneumoniae

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) from Klebsiella pneumoniae is a typical LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) in many ways. However, the lack of a physiologically relevant coeffector for NAC and the fact that NAC can carry out many of its functions as a dimer make NAC unusual among the LTTRs. In the absence of a crystal structure for NAC, we analyzed the effects of amino acid substitutions with a variety of phenotypes in an attempt to identify functionally important features of NAC. A substitution that changed the glutamine at amino acid 29 to alanine (Q29A) resulted in a NAC that was seriously defective in binding to DNA. The H26D substitution resulted in a NAC that could bind and repress transcription but not activate transcription. The I71A substitution resulted in a NAC polypeptide that remained monomeric. NAC tetramers can bind to both long and shorter binding sites (like other LTTRs). However, the absence of a coeffector to induce the conformational change needed for the switch from the former to the latter raised a question. Are there two conformations of NAC, analogous to the other LTTRs? The G217R substitution resulted in a NAC that could bind to the longer sites but had difficulty in binding to the shorter sites, and the I222R and A230R substitutions resulted in a NAC that could bind to the shorter sites but had difficulty in binding properly to the longer sites. Thus, there appear to be two conformations of NAC that can freely interconvert in the absence of a coeffector.

A NAC for regulating metabolism: the nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) from Klebsiella pneumoniae

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) that is made under conditions of nitrogen-limited growth. NAC's synthesis is entirely dependent on phosphorylated NtrC from the two-component Ntr system and requires the unusual sigma factor σ54 for transcription of the nac gene. NAC activates the transcription of σ70-dependent genes whose products provide the cell with ammonia or glutamate. NAC represses genes whose products use ammonia and also represses its own transcription. In addition, NAC also subtly adjusts other cellular functions to keep pace with the supply of biosynthetically available nitrogen.

Regulation of the atrazine-degradative genes in Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP

The Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP is the best-characterized organism able to mineralize the s-triazine herbicide atrazine. This organism has been the subject of extensive biochemical and genetic characterization that has led to its use in bioremediation programs aimed at the decontamination of atrazine-polluted sites. Here, we focus on the recent advances in the understanding of the mechanisms of genetic regulation operating on the atrazine-degradative genes. The Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP atrazine-degradation pathway is encoded by two sets of genes: the constitutively expressed atzA, atzB and atzC, and the strongly regulated atzDEF operon. A complex cascade-like circuit is responsible for the integrated regulation of atzDEF expression in response to nitrogen availability and cyanuric acid. Mechanistic studies have revealed several unusual traits, such as the upstream activating sequence-independent regulation and repression by competition with sigma(54)-RNA polymerase for DNA binding occurring at the sigma(54)-dependent PatzR promoter, and the dual mechanism of transcriptional regulation of the PatzDEF promoter by the LysR-type regulator AtzR in response to two dissimilar signals. These findings have provided new insights into the regulation of the atrazine-biodegradative pathway that are also relevant to widespread bacterial regulatory phenomena, such as global nitrogen control and transcriptional activation by LysR-type transcriptional regulators.

The LysR-type nitrogen assimilation control protein forms complexes with both long and short DNA binding sites in the absence of coeffectors

Most LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) function as tetramers when regulating gene expression. The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) generally functions as a dimer when binding to DNA and activating transcription. However, at some sites, NAC binds as a tetramer. Like many LTTRs, NAC tetramers can recognize sites with long footprints (74 bp for the site at nac) with a substantial DNA bend or short footprints (56 bp for the site at cod) with less DNA bending. However, unlike other LTTRs, NAC can recognize both types of sites in the absence of physiologically relevant coeffectors, suggesting that the two conformers of the NAC tetramer (extended and compact) are interchangeable without the need for any modification to induce or stabilize the change. In order for NAC to bind as a tetramer, three interactions must exist: an interaction between the two NAC dimers and an interaction between each NAC dimer and its corresponding binding site. The interaction between one dimer and its DNA site can be weak (recognizing a half-site rather than a full dimer-binding site), but the other two interactions must be strong. Since the conformation of the NAC tetramer (extended or compact) is determined by the nature of the DNA site without the intervention of a small molecule, we argue that the coeffector that determines the conformation of the NAC tetramer is the DNA site to which it binds.

Expanded role for the nitrogen assimilation control protein in the response of Klebsiella pneumoniae to nitrogen stress

Klebsiella pneumoniae is able to utilize many nitrogen sources, and the utilization of some of these nitrogen sources is dependent on the nitrogen assimilation control (NAC) protein. Seven NAC-regulated promoters have been characterized in K. pneumoniae, and nine NAC-regulated promoters have been found by microarray analysis in Escherichia coli. So far, all characterized NAC-regulated promoters have been directly related to nitrogen metabolism. We have used a genome-wide analysis of NAC binding under nitrogen limitation to identify the regions of the chromosome associated with NAC in K. pneumoniae. We found NAC associated with 99 unique regions of the chromosome under nitrogen limitation. In vitro, 84 of the 99 regions associate strongly enough with purified NAC to produce a shifted band by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Primer extension analysis of the mRNA from genes associated with 17 of the fragments demonstrated that at least one gene associated with each fragment was NAC regulated under nitrogen limitation. The large size of the NAC regulon in K. pneumoniae indicates that NAC plays a larger role in the nitrogen stress response than it does in E. coli. Although a majority of the genes with identifiable functions that associated with NAC under nitrogen limitation are involved in nitrogen metabolism, smaller subsets are associated with carbon and energy acquisition (18 genes), and growth rate control (10 genes). This suggests an expanded role for NAC regulation during the nitrogen stress response, where NAC not only regulates genes involved in nitrogen metabolism but also regulates genes involved in balancing carbon and nitrogen pools and growth rate.

Activation and repression of a sigmaN-dependent promoter naturally lacking upstream activation sequences

The Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP protein AtzR is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator required for activation of the atzDEF operon in response to nitrogen limitation and cyanuric acid. Transcription of atzR is directed by the sigma(N)-dependent promoter PatzR, activated by NtrC and repressed by AtzR. Here we use in vivo and in vitro approaches to address the mechanisms of PatzR activation and repression. Activation by NtrC did not require any promoter sequences other than the sigma(N) recognition motif both in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that NtrC activates PatzR in an upstream activation sequences-independent fashion. Regarding AtzR-dependent autorepression, our in vitro transcription experiments show that the concentration of AtzR required for repression of the PatzR promoter in vitro correlates with AtzR affinity for its binding site. In addition, AtzR prevents transcription from PatzR when added to a preformed E-sigma(N)-PatzR closed complex, but isomerization to an open complex prevents repression. Gel mobility shift and DNase I footprint assays indicate that DNA-bound AtzR and E-sigma(N) are mutually exclusive. Taken together, these results strongly support the notion that AtzR represses transcription from PatzR by competing with E-sigma(N) for their overlapping binding sites. There are no previous reports of a similar mechanism for repression of sigma(N)-dependent transcription.

Transcriptional wiring of the TOL plasmid regulatory network to its host involves the submission of the sigma54-promoter Pu to the response regulator PprA

Implantation of the regulatory circuit of the degradation pathway of TOL plasmid pWW0 in the native transcriptional network of the host Pseudomonas putida involves interplay between plasmid- and chromosome-encoded factors. We have employed a reverse genetics approach to investigate such a molecular wiring by identifying host proteins that form stable complexes with Pu, the sigma(54)-dependent promoter of the upper TOL operon of pWW0. This approach revealed that the Pu upstream activating sequences (UAS), the target sites of the cognate activator XylR, form a specific complex with a host protein which, following DNA affinity purification and mass spectrometry analysis, was identified as the LytTR-type two-component response regulator PprA. Directed inactivation of pprA resulted in the upregulation of the Pu promoter in vivo, while expression of the same gene from a plasmid vector strongly repressed Pu activity. Such a downregulation of Pu by PprA could be faithfully reproduced both in vitro with purified components and in an in vivo reporter system assembled in Escherichia coli. The overlap of the PprA and XylR binding sites suggested that the basis for the inhibitory effect on Pu was a mutual exclusion mechanism between the two proteins to bind the UAS. We argue that the binding of the response regulator PprA to Pu (a case without precedents in sigma(54)-dependent transcription) helps to anchor the TOL regulatory subnetwork to the wider context of the host transcriptome, thereby allowing the entry of physiological signals that modulate the outcome of promoter activity.

The hpx genetic system for hypoxanthine assimilation as a nitrogen source in Klebsiella pneumoniae: gene organization and transcriptional regulation

Growth experiments showed that adenine and hypoxanthine can be used as nitrogen sources by several strains of K. pneumoniae under aerobic conditions. The assimilation of all nitrogens from these purines indicates that the catabolic pathway is complete and proceeds past allantoin. Here we identify the genetic system responsible for the oxidation of hypoxanthine to allantoin in K. pneumoniae. The hpx cluster consists of seven genes, for which an organization in four transcriptional units, hpxDE, hpxR, hpxO, and hpxPQT, is proposed. The proteins involved in the oxidation of hypoxanthine (HpxDE) or uric acid (HpxO) did not display any similarity to other reported enzymes known to catalyze these reactions but instead are similar to oxygenases acting on aromatic compounds. Expression of the hpx system is activated by nitrogen limitation and by the presence of specific substrates, with hpxDE and hpxPQT controlled by both signals. Nitrogen control of hpxPQT transcription, which depends on sigma(54), is mediated by the Ntr system. In contrast, neither NtrC nor the nitrogen assimilation control protein is involved in the nitrogen control of hpxDE, which is dependent on sigma(70) for transcription. Activation of these operons by the specific substrates is also mediated by different effectors and regulatory proteins. Induction of hpxPQT requires uric acid formation, whereas expression of hpxDE is induced by the presence of hypoxanthine through the regulatory protein HpxR. This LysR-type regulator binds to a TCTGC-N(4)-GCAAA site in the intergenic hpxD-hpxR region. When bound to this site for hpxDE activation, HpxR negatively controls its own transcription.

The LysR-type regulator AtzR binding site: DNA sequences involved in activation, repression and cyanuric acid-dependent repositioning

The LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) AtzR of Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP activates the cyanuric acid-utilization atzDEF operon in response to low nitrogen availability and the presence of cyanuric acid. AtzR also represses expression of its own gene, atzR, transcribed divergently from atzDEF. Here we identify and functionally characterize the cis-acting sequences at the atzR-atzDEF divergent promoter region required for AtzR-dependent regulation. AtzR binds a single site overlapping both the PatzR and PatzDEF promoters and induces a DNA bend immediately upstream from PatzDEF. Interaction of AtzR with the inducer cyanuric acid shortens the protein-DNA interaction region and relaxes the DNA bend. The AtzR binding site contains a strong binding determinant, the repression binding site (RBS), centred at position -65 relative to the atzDEF transcriptional start, containing the LTTR binding consensus motif. Integrity of the RBS is essential for high-affinity AtzR binding, activation and autorepression. A second, weaker binding determinant, the activation binding site (ABS), is present between the RBS and PatzDEF. Deletion of the ABS only provokes a modest decrease in AtzR affinity for the promoter region in vitro, but abolishes repression of PatzR in vivo. Involvement of the ABS in autorepression has not been previously reported.

The poor growth of Rhodospirillum rubrum mutants lacking PII proteins is due to an excess of glutamine synthetase activity

The P(II) family of proteins is found in all three domains of life and serves as a central regulator of the function of proteins involved in nitrogen metabolism, reflecting the nitrogen and carbon balance in the cell. The genetic elimination of the genes encoding these proteins typically leads to severe growth problems, but the basis of this effect has been unknown except with Escherichia coli. We have analysed a number of the suppressor mutations that correct such growth problems in Rhodospirillum rubrum mutants lacking P(II) proteins. These suppressors map to nifR3, ntrB, ntrC, amtB(1) and the glnA region and all have the common property of decreasing total activity of glutamine synthetase (GS). We also show that GS activity is very high in the poorly growing parental strains lacking P(II) proteins. Consistent with this, overexpression of GS in glnE mutants (lacking adenylyltransferase activity) also causes poor growth. All of these results strongly imply that elevated GS activity is the causative basis for the poor growth seen in R. rubrum mutants lacking P(II) and presumably in mutants of some other organisms with similar genotypes. The result underscores the importance of proper regulation of GS activity for cell growth.

Importance of tetramer formation by the nitrogen assimilation control protein for strong repression of glutamate dehydrogenase formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) from Klebsiella pneumoniae is a very versatile regulatory protein. NAC activates transcription of operons such as hut (histidine utilization) and ure (urea utilization), whose products generate ammonia. NAC also represses the transcription of genes such as gdhA, whose products use ammonia. NAC exerts a weak repression at gdhA by competing with the binding of a lysine-sensitive activator. NAC also strongly represses transcription of gdhA (about 20-fold) by binding to two separated sites, suggesting a model involving DNA looping. We have identified negative control mutants that are unable to exert this strong repression of gdhA expression but still activate hut and ure expression normally. Some of these negative control mutants (e.g., NAC(86ter) and NAC(132ter)) delete the C-terminal domain, thought to be required for tetramerization. Other negative control mutants (e.g., NAC(L111K) and NAC(L125R)) alter single amino acids involved in tetramerization. In this work we used gel filtration to show that NAC(86ter) and NAC(L111K) are dimers in solution, even at high concentration (NAC(WT) is a tetramer). Moreover, using a combination of DNase I footprints and gel mobility shifts assays, we showed that when NAC(WT) binds to two adjacent sites on a DNA fragment, NAC(WT) binds as a tetramer that bends the DNA fragment significantly. NAC(L111K) binds to such a fragment as two independent dimers without inducing the strong bend. Thus, NAC(L111K) is a dimer in solution or when bound to DNA. NAC(L111K) (typical of the negative control mutants) is wild type for every other property tested: (i) it activates transcription at hut and ure; (ii) it competes with the lysine-sensitive activator for binding at gdhA; (iii) it binds to the same sites at the hut, ure, nac, and gdhA promoters as NAC(WT); (iv) the relative affinity of NAC(L111K) for these sites follows the same order as NAC(WT) (ure > gdhA > nac > hut); (v) it induces the same slight bend as dimers of NAC(WT); and (vi) its DNase I footprints at these sites are indistinguishable from those of NAC(WT) (except for features ascribed to tetramer formation). The only two phenotypes we know for negative control mutants of NAC are their inability to tetramerize and their inability to cause the strong repression of gdhA. Thus, we propose that in order for NAC(WT) to exert the strong repression, it must form a tetramer that bridges the two sites at gdhA (similar to other DNA looping models) and that the negative control mutants of NAC, which fail to tetramerize, cannot form this loop and thus fail to exert the strong repression at gdhA.

Gene regulation at-a-distance in E. coli: new insights

The number of E. coli genes/operons regulated from sites distant from the gene, though limited, steadily increases. The regulation of the ula genes, in charge of L-ascorbate utilization, as well as the negative autoregulation of the non-related lambdaCI and 186CI repressors, for efficient switching of the corresponding phages from lysogeny to lysis, are recent examples. The interaction between the two GalR dimers, separated by 114 bp, undetectable in vitro, has been genetically mapped. lac repressor-operator loops might insulate a gene and its expression from the genomic environment. The genes in charge of nitrogen assimilation sequentially react to ammonia deprivation, via an increasing intracellular NRI concentration. Other sigma54-dependent genes are activated in response to various stimuli.

Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli

Nitrogen limitation in Escherichia coli controls the expression of about 100 genes of the nitrogen regulated (Ntr) response, including the ammonia-assimilating glutamine synthetase. Low intracellular glutamine controls the Ntr response through several regulators, whose activities are modulated by a variety of metabolites. Ntr proteins assimilate ammonia, scavenge nitrogen-containing compounds, and appear to integrate ammonia assimilation with other aspects of metabolism, such as polyamine metabolism and glutamate synthesis. The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) controls the synthesis of glutamate synthase, which controls the Ntr response, presumably through its effect on intracellular glutamine. Some Ntr proteins inhibit the expression of some Lrp-activated genes. Guanosine tetraphosphate appears to control Lrp synthesis. In summary, a network of interacting global regulators that senses different aspects of metabolism integrates nitrogen assimilation with other metabolic processes.

Nitrogen regulation of the codBA (cytosine deaminase) operon from Escherichia coli by the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC

Transcription of the cytosine deaminase (codBA) operon of Escherichia coli is regulated by nitrogen, with about three times more codBA expression in cells grown in nitrogen-limiting medium than in nitrogen-excess medium. Beta-galactosidase expression from codBp-lacZ operon fusions showed that the nitrogen assimilation control protein NAC was necessary for this regulation. In vitro transcription from the codBA promoter with purified RNA polymerase was stimulated by the addition of purified NAC, confirming that no other factors are required. Gel mobility shifts and DNase I footprints showed that NAC binds to a site centered at position -59 relative to the start site of transcription and that mutants that cannot bind NAC there cannot activate transcription. When a longer promoter region (positions -120 to +67) was used, a double footprint was seen with a second 26-bp footprint separated from the first by a hypersensitive site. When a shorter fragment was used (positions -83 to +67), only the primary footprint was seen. Nevertheless, both the shorter and longer fragments showed NAC-mediated regulation in vivo. Cytosine deaminase expression in Klebsiella pneumoniae was also regulated by nitrogen in a NAC-dependent manner. K. pneumoniae differs from E. coli in having two cytosine deaminase genes, an intervening open reading frame between the codB and codA orthologs, and a different response to hypoxanthine which increased cod expression in K. pneumoniae but decreased it in E. coli.

Isolation of a negative control mutant of the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC, in Klebsiella aerogenes

A negative control mutant of the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC, has been isolated. Mutants with the leucine at position 111 changed to a nonhydrophobic residue activate transcription from hut and ure promoters, but fail to repress gdhA expression. This failure does not result from failure to bind to either of the two sites required for gdhA repression, but the binding at those sites is altered in the mutant. It appears that the NAC negative control mutants fail to form the complex structures (probably tetramers) formed by wild-type NAC at the gdhA promoter.

Repression of glutamate dehydrogenase formation in Klebsiella aerogenes requires two binding sites for the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC

In Klebsiella aerogenes, the gdhA gene codes for glutamate dehydrogenase, one of the enzymes responsible for assimilating ammonia into glutamate. Expression of a gdhAp-lacZ transcriptional fusion was strongly repressed by the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC. This strong repression (>50-fold under conditions of severe nitrogen limitation) required the presence of two separate NAC binding sites centered at -89 and +57 relative to the start of gdhA transcription. Mutants lacking either or both of these sites lost the strong repression. The distance between the two sites was less important than the face of the helix on which they lay. Insertion or deletion of 10 bp between the sites had little effect on the strong repression, but insertion of 5 bp or deletion of either 5 or 15 bp decreased the repression significantly. We propose that the strong repression of gdhAp-lacZ expression requires an interaction between the NAC molecules bound at the two sites. A weaker repression of gdhAp-lacZ expression (about threefold) required only the NAC site centered at -89. This weaker repression appears to result from NAC's ability to prevent the action of a positive effector the target of which overlaps the NAC binding site centered at -89. Point mutations and deletions of this region result in the same threefold reduction in gdhAp-lacZ expression as the presence of NAC at this site.

Governor of the glnAp2 promoter of Escherichia coli

Low-affinity sites for the activator NRI-P (NtrC-P) that map between the enhancer and the glnAp2 promoter were responsible for limiting promoter activity at high concentrations of NRI approximately P in intact cells and in an in vitro transcription system consisting of purified bacterial components. That is, the low-affinity sites constitute a 'governor', limiting the maximum promoter activity. As the governor sites are themselves far from the promoter, they apparently act either by preventing the formation of the activation DNA loop that brings the enhancer-bound activator and the promoter-bound polymerase into proximity or by preventing a productive interaction between the enhancer-bound activator and polymerase. The combination of potent enhancer and governor sites at the glnAp2 promoter provides for efficient activation of the promoter when the activator concentration is low, while limiting the maximum level of promoter activity when the activator concentration is high.

The nitrogen assimilation control (Nac) protein represses asnC and asnA transcription in Escherichia coli

In this work, we show that the expression of the asnA and asnC genes is regulated by the availability of ammonium in the growth medium. Our results suggest that, under nitrogen-limiting growth conditions, the nitrogen assimilation control (Nac) protein is involved in the repression of the asnC gene, whose product is required to activate the transcription of asnA. We also show that asparagine negatively affects the expression of asnA, independently of the presence of Nac. These results allow us to conclude that asnA transcription is regulated by two different mechanisms that respond to different effectors: nitrogen and asparagine availability.

Functional characterization of three GlnB homologs in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum: roles in sensing ammonium and energy status

The GlnB (P(II)) protein, the product of glnB, has been characterized previously in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum. Here we describe identification of two other P(II) homologs in this organism, GlnK and GlnJ. Although the sequences of these three homologs are very similar, the molecules have both distinct and overlapping functions in the cell. While GlnB is required for activation of NifA activity in R. rubrum, GlnK and GlnJ do not appear to be involved in this process. In contrast, either GlnB or GlnJ can serve as a critical element in regulation of the reversible ADP ribosylation of dinitrogenase reductase catalyzed by the dinitrogenase reductase ADP-ribosyl transferase (DRAT)/dinitrogenase reductase-activating glycohydrolase (DRAG) regulatory system. Similarly, either GlnB or GlnJ is necessary for normal growth on a variety of minimal and rich media, and any of the proteins is sufficient for normal posttranslational regulation of glutamine synthetase. Surprisingly, in their regulation of the DRAT/DRAG system, GlnB and GlnJ appeared to be responsive not only to changes in nitrogen status but also to changes in energy status, revealing a new role for this family of regulators in central metabolic regulation.

Metabolic context and possible physiological themes of sigma(54)-dependent genes in Escherichia coli

Sigma(54) has several features that distinguish it from other sigma factors in Escherichia coli: it is not homologous to other sigma subunits, sigma(54)-dependent expression absolutely requires an activator, and the activator binding sites can be far from the transcription start site. A rationale for these properties has not been readily apparent, in part because of an inability to assign a common physiological function for sigma(54)-dependent genes. Surveys of sigma(54)-dependent genes from a variety of organisms suggest that the products of these genes are often involved in nitrogen assimilation; however, many are not. Such broad surveys inevitably remove the sigma(54)-dependent genes from a potentially coherent metabolic context. To address this concern, we consider the function and metabolic context of sigma(54)-dependent genes primarily from a single organism, Escherichia coli, in which a reasonably complete list of sigma(54)-dependent genes has been identified by computer analysis combined with a DNA microarray analysis of nitrogen limitation-induced genes. E. coli appears to have approximately 30 sigma(54)-dependent operons, and about half are involved in nitrogen assimilation and metabolism. A possible physiological relationship between sigma(54)-dependent genes may be based on the fact that nitrogen assimilation consumes energy and intermediates of central metabolism. The products of the sigma(54)-dependent genes that are not involved in nitrogen metabolism may prevent depletion of metabolites and energy resources in certain environments or partially neutralize adverse conditions. Such a relationship may limit the number of physiological themes of sigma(54)-dependent genes within a single organism and may partially account for the unique features of sigma(54) and sigma(54)-dependent gene expression.

Mechanisms of transcriptional repression

Transcriptional repressors are usually viewed as proteins that bind to promoters in a way that impedes subsequent binding of RNA polymerase. Although this repression mechanism is found at several promoters, there is a growing list of repressors that inhibit transcription initiation in other ways. For example, several repressors allow the simultaneous binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter, but interfere with subsequent events of the initiation process, eventually inhibiting transcription initiation. The recent increase in the number of repressors for which the repression mechanism has been characterized in detail has shown an amazing variety of strategies to repress transcription initiation. It is not surprising to find that the repression mechanism used is usually exquisitely adapted to the characteristics of the promoter and of the repressor involved.

Multiple regulators and their interactions in vivo and in vitro with the cbb regulons of Rhodobacter capsulatus

The cbb(I) and cbb(II) operons encode structural genes which are important for carbon dioxide fixation via the Calvin-Benson-Bassham reductive pentose phosphate pathway in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Each operon is regulated by cognate LysR-type transcriptional activators, CbbR(I) and CbbR(II), with the product of the cbbR(I) gene, CbbR(I), able to control its own transcription under some growth conditions. Furthermore, CbbR(I) may at least partially regulate the cbb(II) operon, with significant, yet regulated transcription of the cbb(II) operon occurring in the absence of any CbbR. These results suggested the importance of additional regulators. Thus, in addition to the rather specific control exerted by CbbR, a more globally significant regulatory system, the RegA-RegB (PrrA-PrrB) two-component system, was found to contribute to transcriptional regulation of each cbb operon. The regA and regB mutant strains were found to contain constitutive levels of form I and form II RubisCO, the major proteins encoded by the cbb(I) and cbb(II) operons, respectively. In addition, DNaseI footprint analyses indicated that RegA*, a constitutively active mutant form of RegA, binds specifically to cbb(I) and cbb(II) promoter-operator regions. CbbR(I), CbbR(II), and RegA binding loci were localized relative to transcription start sites, leading to a coherent picture of how each of these regulators interacts with specific promoter-operator sequences of the cbb operons.

PII signal transduction proteins

PII proteins, found in Bacteria, Archaea and plants, help coordinate carbon and nitrogen assimilation by regulating the activity of signal transduction enzymes in response to diverse signals. Recent studies of bacterial PII proteins have revealed a solution to the signal transduction problem of how to coordinate multiple receptors in response to diverse stimuli yet permit selective control of these receptors under various conditions and allow adaptation of the system as a whole to long-term stimulation.

Two roles for integration host factor at an enhancer-dependent nifA promoter

Control of transcription in prokaryotes often involves direct contact of regulatory proteins with RNA polymerase. For the sigma54 RNA polymerase, regulatory proteins bound to distally located enhancers engage the polymerase via DNA looping. The sigma54-dependent nifA promoter of Herbaspirillum seropedicae (Hs) is activated under nitrogen-limiting growth conditions. Potential enhancers for the nitrogen control activators NTRC and NIFA and binding sites for integration host factor (IHF) and sigma54-holoenzyme were identified. DNA footprinting experiments showed that these sites functioned for protein binding. Their involvement in the promoter regulation was explored. In vitro, activation of the Hs nifA promoter by NTRC is stimulated by the DNA bending protein IHF. In marked contrast, activation by NIFA is greatly reduced by IHF, thus diminishing potentially destabilizing autoactivation of the nifA promoter by NIFA. Additionally, high levels of NIFA appear to limit NTRC-dependent activation. This inhibition is IHF dependent. Therefore, IHF acts positively and negatively at the nifA promoter to restrict transcription activation to NTRC and one signal transduction pathway.

The PspA protein of Escherichia coli is a negative regulator of sigma(54)-dependent transcription

In Eubacteria, expression of genes transcribed by an RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the alternate sigma factor sigma(54) is positively regulated by proteins belonging to the family of enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs). These proteins bind to upstream activation sequences and are required for the initiation of transcription at the sigma(54)-dependent promoters. They are typically inactive until modified in their N-terminal regulatory domain either by specific phosphorylation or by the binding of a small effector molecule. EBPs lacking this domain, such as the PspF activator of the sigma(54)-dependent pspA promoter, are constitutively active. We describe here the in vivo and in vitro properties of the PspA protein of Escherichia coli, which negatively regulates expression of the pspA promoter without binding DNA directly.

The amino-terminal 100 residues of the nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) encode all known properties of NAC from Klebsiella aerogenes and Escherichia coli

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) from Klebsiella aerogenes or Escherichia coli (NACK or NACE, respectively) is a transcriptional regulator that is both necessary and sufficient to activate transcription of the histidine utilization (hut) operon and to repress transcription of the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) operon in K. aerogenes. Truncated NAC polypeptides, generated by the introduction of stop codons within the nac open reading frame, were tested for the ability to activate hut and repress gdh in vivo. Most of the NACK and NACE fragments with 100 or more amino acids (wild-type NACK and NACE both have 305 amino acids) were functional in activating hut and repressing gdh expression in vivo. Full-length NACK and NACE were isolated as chimeric proteins with the maltose-binding protein (MBP). NACK and NACE released from such chimeras were able to activate hut transcription in a purified system in vitro, as were NACK129 and NACE100 (a NACK fragment of 129 amino acids and a NACE fragment of 100 amino acids) released from comparable chimeras. A set of NACE and NACK fragments carrying nickel-binding histidine tags (his6) at their C termini were also generated. All such constructs derived from NACE were insoluble, as was NACE itself. Of the his6-tagged constructs derived from NACK, NACK100 was inactive, but NACK120 was active. Several NAC fragments were tested for dimerization. NACK120-his6 and NACK100-his6 were dimers in solution. MBP-NACK and MBP-NACK129 were monomers in solution but dimerized when the MBP was released by cleavage with factor Xa. MBP-NACE was readily cleaved by factor Xa, but the resulting NACE was also degraded by the protease. However, MBP-NACE-his6 was completely resistant to cleavage by factor Xa, suggesting an interaction between the C and N termini of this protein.

A protein-induced DNA bend increases the specificity of a prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein

Control of transcription in prokaryotes often involves direct contact of regulatory proteins with RNA polymerase from binding sites located adjacent to the target promoter. Alternatively, in the case of genes transcribed by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the alternate sigma factor sigma54, regulatory proteins bound at more distally located enhancer sites can activate transcription via DNA looping by taking advantage of the increasing flexibility of DNA over longer distances. While this second mechanism offers a greater possible flexibility in the location of these binding sites, it is not clear how the specificity offered by the proximity of the regulatory protein and the polymerase intrinsic to the first mechanism is maintained. Here we demonstrate that integration host factor (IHF), a protein that induces a sharp bend in DNA, acts both to inhibit DNA-looping-dependent transcriptional activation by an inappropriate enhancer-binding protein and to facilitate similar activation by an appropriate enhancer-binding protein. These opposite effects have the consequence of increasing the specificity of activation of a promoter that is susceptible to regulation by proteins bound to a distal site.

The nac (nitrogen assimilation control) gene from Escherichia coli

The nitrogen assimilation control gene, nac, was detected in Escherichia coli but not in Salmonella typhimurium by Southern blotting, using a probe from the Klebsiella aerogenes nac (nacK) gene. The E. coli nac gene (nacE) was isolated from a cosmid clone by complementation of a nac mutation in K. aerogenes. nacE was fully functional in this complementation assay. DNA sequence analysis showed considerable divergence between nacE and nacK, with a predicted amino acid sequence identity of only 79% and most of the divergence in the C-terminal half of the protein sequence. The total predicted size of NAC(E) is 305 amino acids, the same as for NAC(K). A null mutation, nac-28, was generated by reverse genetics. Mutants bearing nac-28 have a variety of phenotypes related to nitrogen metabolism, including slower growth on cytosine, faster growth on arginine, and suppression of the failure of an Ntr-constitutive mutant to grow with serine as sole nitrogen source. In addition to a loss of nitrogen regulation of histidase formation, nac-28 mutants also showed a loss of a weak repression of glutamate dehydrogenase formation. This repression was unexpected because it is balanced by a NAC-independent activation of glutamate dehydrogenase formation during nitrogen-limited growth. Attempts to purify NAC(E) by using methods established for NAC(K) failed, and NAC(E) appears to be degraded with a half-life at 30 degrees C as short as 15 min during inhibition of protein synthesis.

Two roles for the DNA recognition site of the Klebsiella aerogenes nitrogen assimilation control protein

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) binds to a site within the promoter region of the histidine utilization operon (hutUH) of Klebsiella aerogenes, and NAC bound at this site activates transcription of hutUH. This NAC-binding site was characterized by a combination of random and directed DNA mutagenesis. Mutations that abolished or diminished in vivo transcriptional activation by NAC were found to lie within a 15-bp region contained within the 26-bp region protected by NAC from DNase I digestion. This 15-bp core has the palindromic ends ATA and TAT, and it matches the consensus for LysR family transcriptional regulators. Protein-binding experiments showed that transcriptional activation in vivo decreased with decreasing binding in vitro. In contrast to the NAC-binding site from hutUH, the NAC-binding site from the gdhA promoter failed to activate transcription from a semisynthetic promoter, and this failure was not due to weak binding or greatly distorted protein-DNA structure. Mutations in the promoter-proximal half-site of the NAC-binding site from gdhA allowed this site to activate transcription. Similar studies using the NAC-binding site from hut showed that two mutations in the promoter proximal half-site increased binding but abolished transcriptional activation. Interestingly, for symmetric mutations in the promoter-distal half-site, loss of transcriptional activation was always correlated with a decrease in binding. We conclude from these observations that if the binding in vitro reflects the binding in vivo, then binding of NAC to DNA is not sufficient for transcriptional activation and that the NAC-binding site can be functionally divided in two half-sites, with related but different functions.

Clues and consequences of DNA bending in transcription

This review attempts to substantiate the notion that nonlinear DNA structures allow prokaryotic cells to evolve complex signal integration devices that, to some extent, parallel the transduction cascades employed by higher organisms to control cell growth and differentiation. Regulatory cascades allow the possibility of inserting additional checks, either positive or negative, in every step of the process. In this context, the major consequence of DNA bending in transcription is that promoter geometry becomes a key regulatory element. By using DNA bending, bacteria afford multiple metabolic control levels simply through alteration of promoter architecture, so that positive signals favor an optimal constellation of protein-protein and protein-DNA contacts required for activation. Additional effects of regulated DNA bending in prokaryotic promoters include the amplification and translation of small physiological signals into major transcriptional responses and the control of promoter specificity for cognate regulators.

Coactivation in vitro of the sigma54-dependent promoter Pu of the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida by HU and the mammalian HMG-1 protein

The mechanism by which the prokaryotic histone-like protein HU replaces the integration host factor (IHF) in the coactivation of the sigma54-dependent promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida has been investigated. By using a preactivated form of the cognate activator protein XylR, we show that the functional replacement of IHF with HU previously suggested in vivo can be faithfully reproduced in vitro with purified components. Furthermore, the coactivation effect of IHF on Pu could be mimicked not only by HU but also by the mammalian nonhistone chromatin protein HMG-1 and could be bypassed by intrinsically curved DNA. These results suggest that either of two different mechanisms (generation of a site-specific static DNA bend or a general flexibilization of the promoter region) gives rise to the same structural effect of stimulating transcription from Pu through changes in promoter architecture.

Activation of transcription initiation from the nac promoter of Klebsiella aerogenes

The nac gene of Klebsiella aerogenes encodes a bifunctional transcription factor that activates or represses the expression of several operons under conditions of nitrogen limitation. In experiments with purified components, transcription from the nac promoter was initiated by sigma 54 RNA polymerase and was activated by the phosphorylated form of nitrogen regulator I (NRI) (NtrC). The activation of the nac promoter required a higher concentration of NRI approximately P than did the activation of the Escherichia coli glnAp2 promoter, and both the promoter and upstream enhancer element contributed to this difference. The nac promoter had a lower affinity for sigma 54 RNA polymerase than did glnAp2, and uninitiated competitor-resistant transcription complexes formed at the nac promoter decayed to competitor-sensitive complexes at a greater rate than did similar complexes formed at the glnAp2 promoter. The nac enhancer, consisting of a single high-affinity NRI-binding site and an adjacent site with low affinity for NRI, was less efficient in stimulating transcription than was the glnA enhancer, which consists of two adjacent high-affinity NRI-binding sites. When these binding sites were exchanged, transcription from the nac promoter was increased and transcription from the glnAp2 promoter was decreased at low concentrations of NRI approximately P. Another indication of the difference in the efficiency of these enhancers is that although activation of a nac promoter construct containing the glnA enhancer was relatively insensitive to subtle alterations in the position of these sites relative to the position of the promoter, activation of the natural nac promoter or a nac promoter construct containing only a single high-affinity NRI approximately P binding site was strongly affected by subtle alterations in the position of the NRI approximately P binding site(s), indicating a face-of-the-helix dependency for activation.