Bacillus subtilis mutant LicT antiterminators exhibiting enzyme I- and HPr-independent antitermination affect catabolite repression of the bglPH operon

Resolving the activation mechanism of the D99N antiterminator LicT protein

LicT is an antiterminator protein of the BglG family whose members are key players in the control of carbohydrate catabolism in bacteria. These antiterminators are generally composed of three modules, an N-terminal RNA-binding domain (CAT) followed by two homologous regulation modules (PRD1 and PRD2) that control the RNA binding activity of the effector domain via phosphorylation on conserved histidines. Although several structures of isolated domains of BglG-like proteins have been described, no structure containing CAT and at least one PRD simultaneously has yet been reported in an active state, precluding detailed understanding of signal transduction between modules. To fulfill this gap, we recently reported the complete NMR sequence assignment of a constitutively active mutant (D99N) CAT-PRD1*, which contains the effector domain and the first regulation domain of LicT. As a follow-up, we have determined and report here the 3D solution structure of this active, dimeric LicT construct (40 kDa). The structure reveals how the mutation constrains the PRD1 regulation domain into an active conformation which is transduced to CAT via a network of negatively charged residues belonging to PRD1 dimeric interface and to the linker region. In addition, our data support a model where BglG-type antitermination regulatory modules can only adopt a single conformation compatible with the active structure of the effector domain, regardless of whether activation is mediated by mutation on the first or second PRD. The linker between the effector and regulation modules appears to function as an adaptable hinge tuning the position of the functional modules.

NMR chemical shift assignment of a constitutively active fragment of the antitermination protein LicT

LicT belongs to an essential family of bacterial antitermination proteins which bind to nascent mRNAs in order to stimulate transcription of sugar-metabolizing operons. As most of other antitermination proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism, LicT is composed of a N-terminal RNA-binding module (CAT) and two homologous regulatory modules (PRD1 and PRD2). The activity of the CAT effector module is controlled by antagonist phosphorylations by the phosphotransferase system on conserved histidines of the two C-terminal PRDs in response to available carbon sources. Previous studies on truncated and mutant constructs have provided partial structural insight into the mechanism of signal transduction between the N-terminal RNA-binding domain and the two regulation modules. However, no structure at atomic resolution has been ever solved that contain the RNA-binding domain and a regulation module. We report the NMR assignment of a constitutively active fragment of LicT, named D99A-CAT-PRD1 or CAT-PRD1*. This fragment is composed of the RNA-binding module and the first N-terminal regulation module which bears the mutation of Asp99 to an asparagine. It is dimeric as the native protein, with a 40 kD molecular weight. The D99N mutation is sufficient to endow this fragment with a high RNA-binding constitutive activity, in a phosphorylation-free context. The assignment reported here should set the base of future NMR investigation of signal transduction between the regulatory module and the effector module in the active state of the protein, and in the long term enable the structural study of the full length protein structure in interaction with its target RNA.

PTS-Mediated Regulation of the Transcription Activator MtlR from Different Species: Surprising Differences despite Strong Sequence Conservation

The hexitol D-mannitol is transported by many bacteria via a phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS). In most Firmicutes, the transcription activator MtlR controls the expression of the genes encoding the D-mannitol-specific PTS components and D-mannitol-1-P dehydrogenase. MtlR contains an N-terminal helix-turn-helix motif followed by an Mga-like domain, two PTS regulation domains (PRDs), an EIIB(Gat)- and an EIIA(Mtl)-like domain. The four regulatory domains are the target of phosphorylation by PTS components. Despite strong sequence conservation, the mechanisms controlling the activity of MtlR from Lactobacillus casei, Bacillus subtilis and Geobacillus stearothermophilus are quite different. Owing to the presence of a tyrosine in place of the second conserved histidine (His) in PRD2, L. casei MtlR is not phosphorylated by Enzyme I (EI) and HPr. When the corresponding His in PRD2 of MtlR from B. subtilis and G. stearothermophilus was replaced with alanine, the transcription regulator was no longer phosphorylated and remained inactive. Surprisingly, L. casei MtlR functions without phosphorylation in PRD2 because in a ptsI (EI) mutant MtlR is constitutively active. EI inactivation prevents not only phosphorylation of HPr, but also of the PTS(Mtl) components, which inactivate MtlR by phosphorylating its EIIB(Gat)- or EIIA(Mtl)-like domain. This explains the constitutive phenotype of the ptsI mutant. The absence of EIIB(Mtl)-mediated phosphorylation leads to induction of the L. caseimtl operon. This mechanism resembles mtlARFD induction in G. stearothermophilus, but differs from EIIA(Mtl)-mediated induction in B. subtilis. In contrast to B. subtilis MtlR, L. casei MtlR activation does not require sequestration to the membrane via the unphosphorylated EIIB(Mtl) domain.

Carbon catabolite repression by seryl phosphorylated HPr is essential to Streptococcus pneumoniae in carbohydrate-rich environments

Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) is a regulatory phenomenon implemented by bacteria to hierarchically organize carbohydrate utilization in order to achieve maximal growth. CCR is likely of great importance to Streptococcus pneumoniae because the human host sites inhabited by this pathogen represent complex carbohydrate environments. In this species, inactivation of the prototypical Gram-positive CCR master regulator, ccpA, attenuates virulence in mice but does not relieve CCR of most metabolic enzymes, suggesting CcpA-independent CCR mechanisms predominate. Here we show the activities of three transcriptional regulators constitute the majority of transcriptional CCR of galactose metabolism operons. We determined seryl-phosphorylated histidine phosphocarrier protein (HPr-Ser∼P)-mediated regulation is a major CCR mechanism and an essential activity in the pneumococcus, as an HPr point mutation abolishing HPrK/P-dependent phosphorylation was not tolerated nor was deletion of hprk/p. The HPr-Ser∼P phosphomimetic mutant HPr S46D had reduced phosphotransferase system transport rates and limited induction of CCR-repressed genes. These results support a model of pneumococcal CCR in which HPr-Ser∼P directly affects the activity of CcpA while indirectly affecting the activity of pathway-specific transactional regulators. This report describes the first CcpA-independent CCR mechanism identified in the pneumococcus and the first example of lethality from loss of HPr-Ser∼P-mediated CCR in any species.

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: regulation by protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) carries out both catalytic and regulatory functions. It catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of a variety of sugars and sugar derivatives but also carries out numerous regulatory functions related to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphate metabolism, to chemotaxis, to potassium transport, and to the virulence of certain pathogens. For these different regulatory processes, the signal is provided by the phosphorylation state of the PTS components, which varies according to the availability of PTS substrates and the metabolic state of the cell. PEP acts as phosphoryl donor for enzyme I (EI), which, together with HPr and one of several EIIA and EIIB pairs, forms a phosphorylation cascade which allows phosphorylation of the cognate carbohydrate bound to the membrane-spanning EIIC. HPr of firmicutes and numerous proteobacteria is also phosphorylated in an ATP-dependent reaction catalyzed by the bifunctional HPr kinase/phosphorylase. PTS-mediated regulatory mechanisms are based either on direct phosphorylation of the target protein or on phosphorylation-dependent interactions. For regulation by PTS-mediated phosphorylation, the target proteins either acquired a PTS domain by fusing it to their N or C termini or integrated a specific, conserved PTS regulation domain (PRD) or, alternatively, developed their own specific sites for PTS-mediated phosphorylation. Protein-protein interactions can occur with either phosphorylated or unphosphorylated PTS components and can either stimulate or inhibit the function of the target proteins. This large variety of signal transduction mechanisms allows the PTS to regulate numerous proteins and to form a vast regulatory network responding to the phosphorylation state of various PTS components.

Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis mannitol utilization genes: promoter structure and transcriptional activation by the wild-type regulator (MtlR) and its mutants

Expression of mannitol utilization genes in Bacillus subtilis is directed by PmtlA, the promoter of the mtlAFD operon, and PmtlR, the promoter of the MtlR activator. MtlR contains phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) regulation domains, called PRDs. The activity of PRD-containing MtlR is mainly regulated by the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of its PRDII and EIIB(Gat)-like domains. Replacing histidine 342 and cysteine 419 residues, which are the targets of phosphorylation in these two domains, by aspartate and alanine provided MtlR-H342D C419A, which permanently activates PmtlA in vivo. In the mtlR-H342D C419A mutant, PmtlA was active, even when the mtlAFD operon was deleted from the genome. The mtlR-H342D C419A allele was expressed in an Escherichia coli strain lacking enzyme I of the PTS. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using purified MtlR-H342D C419A showed an interaction between the MtlR double-mutant and the Cy5-labelled PmtlA and PmtlR DNA fragments. These investigations indicate that the activated MtlR functions regardless of the presence of the mannitol-specific transporter (MtlA). This is in contrast to the proposed model in which the sequestration of MtlR by the MtlA transporter is necessary for the activity of MtlR. Additionally, DNase I footprinting, construction of PmtlA-PlicB hybrid promoters, as well as increasing the distance between the MtlR operator and the -35 box of PmtlA revealed that the activated MtlR molecules and RNA polymerase holoenzyme likely form a class II type activation complex at PmtlA and PmtlR during transcription initiation.

Transcription regulators controlled by interaction with enzyme IIB components of the phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system

Numerous bacteria possess transcription activators and antiterminators composed of regulatory domains phosphorylated by components of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS). These domains, called PTS regulation domains (PRDs), usually contain two conserved histidines as potential phosphorylation sites. While antiterminators possess two PRDs with four phosphorylation sites, transcription activators contain two PRDs plus two regulatory domains resembling PTS components (EIIA and EIIB). The activity of these transcription regulators is controlled by up to five phosphorylations catalyzed by PTS proteins. Phosphorylation by the general PTS components EI and HPr is usually essential for the activity of PRD-containing transcription regulators, whereas phosphorylation by the sugar-specific components EIIA or EIIB lowers their activity. For a specific regulator, for example the Bacillus subtilis mtl operon activator MtlR, the functional phosphorylation sites can be different in other bacteria and consequently the detailed mode of regulation varies. Some of these transcription regulators are also controlled by an interaction with a sugar-specific EIIB PTS component. The EIIBs are frequently fused to the membrane-spanning EIIC and EIIB-mediated membrane sequestration is sometimes crucial for the control of a transcription regulator. This is also true for the Escherichia coli repressor Mlc, which does not contain a PRD but nevertheless interacts with the EIIB domain of the glucose-specific PTS. In addition, some PRD-containing transcription activators interact with a distinct EIIB protein located in the cytoplasm. The phosphorylation state of the EIIB components, which changes in response to the presence or absence of the corresponding carbon source, affects their interaction with transcription regulators. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Inhibitors of Protein Kinases (2012).

Determinants of interaction specificity of the Bacillus subtilis GlcT antitermination protein: functionality and phosphorylation specificity depend on the arrangement of the regulatory domains

The control of several catabolic operons in bacteria by transcription antitermination is mediated by RNA-binding proteins that consist of an RNA-binding domain and two reiterated phosphotransferase system regulation domains (PRDs). The Bacillus subtilis GlcT antitermination protein regulates the expression of the ptsG gene, encoding the glucose-specific enzyme II of the phosphotransferase system. In the absence of glucose, GlcT becomes inactivated by enzyme II-dependent phosphorylation at its PRD1, whereas the phosphotransferase HPr phosphorylates PRD2. However, here we demonstrate by NMR analysis and mass spectrometry that HPr also phosphorylates PRD1 in vitro but with low efficiency. Size exclusion chromatography revealed that non-phosphorylated PRD1 forms dimers that dissociate upon phosphorylation. The effect of HPr on PRD1 was also investigated in vivo. For this purpose, we used GlcT variants with altered domain arrangements or domain deletions. Our results demonstrate that HPr can target PRD1 when this domain is placed at the C terminus of the protein. In agreement with the in vitro data, HPr exerts a negative control on PRD1. This work provides the first insights into how specificity is achieved in a regulator that contains duplicated regulatory domains with distinct dimerization properties that are controlled by phosphorylation by different phosphate donors. Moreover, the results suggest that the domain arrangement of the PRD-containing antitermination proteins is under selective pressure to ensure the proper regulatory output, i.e. transcription antitermination of the target genes specifically in the presence of the corresponding sugar.

Rewiring carbon catabolite repression for microbial cell factory

Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) is a key regulatory system found in most microorganisms that ensures preferential utilization of energy-efficient carbon sources. CCR helps microorganisms obtain a proper balance between their metabolic capacity and the maximum sugar uptake capability. It also constrains the deregulated utilization of a preferred cognate substrate, enabling microorganisms to survive and dominate in natural environments. On the other side of the same coin lies the tenacious bottleneck in microbial production of bioproducts that employs a combination of carbon sources in varied proportion, such as lignocellulose-derived sugar mixtures. Preferential sugar uptake combined with the transcriptional and/or enzymatic exclusion of less preferred sugars turns out one of the major barriers in increasing the yield and productivity of fermentation process. Accumulation of the unused substrate also complicates the downstream processes used to extract the desired product. To overcome this difficulty and to develop tailor-made strains for specific metabolic engineering goals, quantitative and systemic understanding of the molecular interaction map behind CCR is a prerequisite. Here we comparatively review the universal and strain-specific features of CCR circuitry and discuss the recent efforts in developing synthetic cell factories devoid of CCR particularly for lignocellulose- based biorefinery.

Malate-mediated carbon catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis involves the HPrK/CcpA pathway

Most organisms can choose their preferred carbon source from a mixture of nutrients. This process is called carbon catabolite repression. The Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis uses glucose as the preferred source of carbon and energy. Glucose-mediated catabolite repression is caused by binding of the CcpA transcription factor to the promoter regions of catabolic operons. CcpA binds DNA upon interaction with its cofactors HPr(Ser-P) and Crh(Ser-P). The formation of the cofactors is catalyzed by the metabolite-activated HPr kinase/phosphorylase. Recently, it has been shown that malate is a second preferred carbon source for B. subtilis that also causes catabolite repression. In this work, we addressed the mechanism by which malate causes catabolite repression. Genetic analyses revealed that malate-dependent catabolite repression requires CcpA and its cofactors. Moreover, we demonstrate that HPr(Ser-P) is present in malate-grown cells and that CcpA and HPr interact in vivo in the presence of glucose or malate but not in the absence of a repressing carbon source. The formation of the cofactor HPr(Ser-P) could be attributed to the concentrations of ATP and fructose 1,6-bisphosphate in cells growing with malate. Both metabolites are available at concentrations that are sufficient to stimulate HPr kinase activity. The adaptation of cells to environmental changes requires dynamic metabolic and regulatory adjustments. The repression strength of target promoters was similar to that observed in steady-state growth conditions, although it took somewhat longer to reach the second steady-state of expression when cells were shifted to malate.

Insight into bacterial phosphotransferase system-mediated signaling by interspecies transplantation of a transcriptional regulator

The bacterial sugar:phosphotransferase system (PTS) delivers phosphoryl groups via proteins EI and HPr to the EII sugar transporters. The antitermination protein LicT controls β-glucoside utilization in Bacillus subtilis and belongs to a family of bacterial transcriptional regulators that are antagonistically controlled by PTS-catalyzed phosphorylations at two homologous PTS regulation domains (PRDs). LicT is inhibited by phosphorylation of PRD1, which is mediated by the β-glucoside transporter EII(Bgl). Phosphorylation of PRD2 is catalyzed by HPr and stimulates LicT activity. Here, we report that LicT, when artificially expressed in the nonrelated bacterium Escherichia coli, is likewise phosphorylated at both PRDs, but the phosphoryl group donors differ. Surprisingly, E. coli HPr phosphorylates PRD1 rather than PRD2, while the stimulatory phosphorylation of PRD2 is carried out by the HPr homolog NPr. This demonstrates that subtle differences in the interaction surface of HPr can switch its affinities toward the PRDs. NPr transfers phosphoryl groups from EI(Ntr) to EIIA(Ntr). Together these proteins form the paralogous PTS(Ntr), which controls the activity of K(+) transporters in response to unknown signals. This is achieved by binding of dephosphorylated EIIA(Ntr) to other proteins. We generated LicT mutants that were controlled either negatively by HPr or positively by NPr and were suitable bio-bricks, in order to monitor or to couple gene expression to the phosphorylation states of these two proteins. With the aid of these tools, we identified the stringent starvation protein SspA as a regulator of EIIA(Ntr) phosphorylation, indicating that PTS(Ntr) represents a stress-related system in E. coli.

Control of Bacillus subtilis mtl operon expression by complex phosphorylation-dependent regulation of the transcriptional activator MtlR

Many bacteria transport mannitol via the mtlAF-encoded phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS). In most firmicutes the transcriptional activator MtlR controls expression of the mtl operon. MtlR possesses an N-terminal DNA binding domain, two PTS regulation domains (PRDs), an EIIB(Gat)- and EIIA(Mtl)-like domain. These four regulatory domains contain one or two potential PTS phosphorylation sites. Replacement of His-342 or His-399 in PRD2 with Ala prevented the phosphorylation of Bacillus subtilis MtlR by PEP, EI and HPr. These mutations as well as EI inactivation caused a loss of MtlR function in vivo. In contrast, phosphomimetic replacement of His-342 with Asp rendered MtlR constitutively active. The absence of phosphorylation in PRD2 serves as catabolite repression mechanism. When EIIA(Mtl) and the soluble EIIB(Mtl) domain of the EIICB(Mtl) permease were included in the phosphorylation mixture, His-599 in the EIIA-like domain of MtlR also became phosphorylated. Replacement of His-599 with Asp rendered MtlR inactive, while His599Ala replacement caused slightly constitutive, glucose-repressible MtlR activity. Doubly mutated His342Ala/His599Ala MtlR was still phosphorylated by EI, HPr and EIIA(Mtl) at Cys-419 in the EIIB(Gat)-like domain. Cys419Ala replacement and deletion of EIIA(Mtl) caused strong constitutive glucose-repressible MtlR activity. This is the first report that Cys phosphorylation controls PRD-containing transcriptional activators.

Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients

Most bacteria can selectively use substrates from a mixture of different carbon sources. The presence of preferred carbon sources prevents the expression, and often also the activity, of catabolic systems that enable the use of secondary substrates. This regulation, called carbon catabolite repression (CCR), can be achieved by different regulatory mechanisms, including transcription activation and repression and control of translation by an RNA-binding protein, in different bacteria. Moreover, CCR regulates the expression of virulence factors in many pathogenic bacteria. In this Review, we discuss the most recent findings on the different mechanisms that have evolved to allow bacteria to use carbon sources in a hierarchical manner.

Structural mechanism of signal transduction between the RNA-binding domain and the phosphotransferase system regulation domain of the LicT antiterminator

LicT belongs to a family of bacterial transcriptional antiterminators, which control the expression of sugar-metabolizing operons in response to phosphorylations by the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS). Previous studies of LicT have revealed the structural basis of RNA recognition by the dimeric N-terminal co-antiterminator (CAT) domain on the one hand and the conformational changes undergone by the duplicated regulation domain (PRD1 and PRD2) upon activation on the other hand. To investigate the mechanism of signal transduction between the effector and regulation modules, we have undertaken the characterization of a fragment, including the CAT and PRD1 domains and the linker in-between. Comparative experiments, including RNA binding assays, NMR spectroscopy, limited proteolysis, analytical ultracentrifugation, and circular dichroism, were conducted on native CAT-PRD1 and on a constitutively active CAT-PRD1 mutant carrying a D99N substitution in PRD1. We show that in the native state, CAT-PRD1 behaves as a rather unstable RNA-binding deficient dimer, in which the CAT dimer interface is significantly altered and the linker region is folded as a trypsin-resistant helix. In the activated mutant form, the CAT-PRD1 linker becomes protease-sensitive, and the helix content decreases, and the CAT module adopts the same dimeric conformation as in isolated CAT, thereby restoring the affinity for RNA. From these results, we propose that a helix-to-coil transition in the linker acts as the structural relay triggered by the regulatory domain for remodeling the effector dimer interface. In essence, the structural mechanism modulating the LicT RNA antitermination activity is thus similar to that controlling the DNA binding activity of dimeric transcriptional regulators.

Uncovering new metabolic capabilities of Bacillus subtilis using phenotype profiling of rifampin-resistant rpoB mutants

RNA polymerase is a central macromolecular machine controlling the flow of information from genotype to phenotype, and insights into global transcriptional regulation can be gained by studying mutational perturbations in the enzyme. Mutations in the RNA polymerase beta subunit gene rpoB causing resistance to rifampin (Rif(r)) in Bacillus subtilis were previously shown to lead to alterations in the expression of a number of global phenotypes known to be under transcriptional control, such as growth, competence for transformation, sporulation, and germination (H. Maughan, B. Galeano, and W. L. Nicholson, J. Bacteriol. 186:2481-2486, 2004). To better understand the global effects of rpoB mutations on metabolism, wild-type and 11 distinct congenic Rif(r) mutant strains of B. subtilis were tested for utilization of 95 substrates by use of Biolog GP2 MicroPlates. A number of alterations of substrate utilization patterns were observed in the Rif(r) mutants, including the utilization of novel substrates previously unknown in B. subtilis, such as gentiobiose, beta-methyl-D-glucoside, and D-psicose. The results indicate that combining global metabolic profiling with mutations in RNA polymerase provides a system-wide approach for uncovering previously unknown metabolic capabilities and further understanding global transcriptional control circuitry in B. subtilis.

Regulation of sugar catabolism in Lactococcus lactis

The increasing number of genomic and post-genomic studies on Gram-positive organisms and especially on lactic acid bacteria brings a lot of information on sugar catabolism in these bacteria. Like for many other bacteria, glucose is the most preferred source of carbon and energy for Lactococcus lactis. Other carbon sources can induce their own utilization in the absence of well-metabolized sugar. These processes engage numbers of genes and undergo complex mechanisms of regulation. In this review, we discuss various biochemical and genetic control mechanisms involved in sugar catabolism, like regulation by repressors, activators, antiterminators or carbon catabolite repression control.

How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria

The phosphoenolpyruvate(PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) is found only in bacteria, where it catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of numerous monosaccharides, disaccharides, amino sugars, polyols, and other sugar derivatives. To carry out its catalytic function in sugar transport and phosphorylation, the PTS uses PEP as an energy source and phosphoryl donor. The phosphoryl group of PEP is usually transferred via four distinct proteins (domains) to the transported sugar bound to the respective membrane component(s) (EIIC and EIID) of the PTS. The organization of the PTS as a four-step phosphoryl transfer system, in which all P derivatives exhibit similar energy (phosphorylation occurs at histidyl or cysteyl residues), is surprising, as a single protein (or domain) coupling energy transfer and sugar phosphorylation would be sufficient for PTS function. A possible explanation for the complexity of the PTS was provided by the discovery that the PTS also carries out numerous regulatory functions. Depending on their phosphorylation state, the four proteins (domains) forming the PTS phosphorylation cascade (EI, HPr, EIIA, and EIIB) can phosphorylate or interact with numerous non-PTS proteins and thereby regulate their activity. In addition, in certain bacteria, one of the PTS components (HPr) is phosphorylated by ATP at a seryl residue, which increases the complexity of PTS-mediated regulation. In this review, we try to summarize the known protein phosphorylation-related regulatory functions of the PTS. As we shall see, the PTS regulation network not only controls carbohydrate uptake and metabolism but also interferes with the utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus and the virulence of certain pathogens.

Opposing effects of histidine phosphorylation regulate the AtxA virulence transcription factor in Bacillus anthracis

Expression of genes for Bacillus anthracis toxin and capsule virulence factors are dependent upon the AtxA transcription factor. The mechanism by which AtxA regulates the transcription of its target genes is unknown. Here we report that bioinformatic analyses suggested the presence in AtxA of two PTS (phosphenolpyruvate : sugar phosphotransferase system) regulation domains (PRD) generally regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation at conserved histidine residues. By means of amino acid substitutions that mimic the phosphorylated (H to D) or the unphosphorylated (H to A) state of the protein, we showed that phosphorylation of H199 of PRD1 is likely to be necessary for AtxA activation while phosphorylation of H379 in PRD2 is inhibitory to toxin gene transcription. In vivo labelling experiments with radioactive phosphate allowed us to propose that H199 and H379 are AtxA residues subject to regulated phosphorylation. In support to these notions, we also show that deletion of ptsHI, encoding the HPr intermediate and the EI enzymes of PTS, or growth in the presence of glucose affect positively and negatively, respectively, the activity of AtxA. Our results link virulence factor production in B. anthracis to carbohydrate metabolism and, for the first time, provide a mechanistic explanation for AtxA transcriptional activity.

Identification and characterization of a fructose phosphotransferase system in Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003

In silico analysis of the Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 genome allowed identification of four genetic loci, each of which specifies a putative enzyme II (EII) protein of a phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system. The EII encoded by fruA, a clear homologue of the unique EIIBCA enzyme encoded by the Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705 genome, was studied in more detail. The fruA gene is part of an operon which contains fruT, which is predicted to encode a homologue of the Bacillus subtilis antiterminator LicT. Transcriptional analysis showed that the fru operon is induced by fructose. The genetic structure, complementation studies, and the observed transcription pattern of the fru operon suggest that the EII encoded in B. breve is involved in fructose transport and that its expression is controlled by an antiterminator mechanism. Biochemical studies unequivocally demonstrated that FruA phosphorylates fructose at the C-6 position.

Lactose-over-glucose preference in Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705: glcP, encoding a glucose transporter, is subject to lactose repression

Analysis of culture supernatants obtained from Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705 grown on glucose and lactose revealed that glucose utilization is impaired until depletion of lactose. Thus, unlike many other bacteria, B. longum preferentially uses lactose rather than glucose as the primary carbon source. Glucose uptake experiments with B. longum cells showed that glucose transport was repressed in the presence of lactose. A comparative analysis of global gene expression profiling using DNA arrays led to the identification of only one gene repressed by lactose, the putative glucose transporter gene glcP. The functionality of GlcP as glucose transporter was demonstrated by heterologous complementation of a glucose transport-deficient Escherichia coli strain. Additionally, GlcP exhibited the highest substrate specificity for glucose. Primer extension and real-time PCR analyses confirmed that expression of glcP was mediated by lactose. Hence, our data demonstrate that the presence of lactose in culture medium leads to the repression of glucose transport and transcriptional down-regulation of the glucose transporter gene glcP. This may reflect the highly adapted life-style of B. longum in the gastrointestinal tract of mammals.

How seryl-phosphorylated HPr inhibits PrfA, a transcription activator of Listeria monocytogenes virulence genes

Listeria monocytogenes PrfA, a transcription activator for several virulence genes, including the hemolysin-encoding hly, is inhibited by rapidly metabolizable carbon sources (glucose, fructose, etc.). This inhibition is not mediated via the major carbon catabolite repression mechanism of gram-positive bacteria, since inactivation of the catabolite control protein A (CcpA) did not prevent the repression of virulence genes by the above sugars. In order to test whether the catabolite co-repressor P-Ser-HPr might be involved in PrfA regulation, we used a Bacillus subtilis strain (BUG1199) containing L. monocytogenes prfA under control of pspac and the lacZ reporter gene fused to the PrfA-activated hly promoter. Formation of P-Ser-HPr requires the bifunctional HPr kinase/phosphorylase (HprK/P), which, depending on the concentration of certain metabolites, either phosphorylates HPr at Ser-46 or dephosphorylates P-Ser-HPr. The hprKV267F allele codes for an HprK/P leading to the accumulation of P-Ser-HPr, since it has normal kinase, but almost no phosphorylase activity. Interestingly, introducing hprKV267F into BUG1199 strongly inhibited transcription activation by PrfA. Preventing the accumulation of P-Ser-HPr in the hprKV267F mutant by replacing Ser-46 in HPr with an alanine restored PrfA activity, while ccpA inactivation had no effect. Interestingly, disruption of ccpA in the hprK wild-type strain BUG1199 also led to inhibition of PrfA. The lowered lacZ expression in the ccpA strain is probably also due to elevated amounts of P-Ser-HPr, since it disappeared when Ser-46 in HPr was replaced with an alanine. To carry out its catalytic function in sugar transport, HPr of the phosphotransferase system (PTS) is also phosphorylated by phosphoenolpyruvate and enzyme I at His-15. However, P-Ser-HPr is only very slowly phosphorylated by enzyme I, which probably accounts for PrfA inhibition. In agreement with this concept, disruption of the enzyme I- or HPr-encoding genes also strongly inhibited PrfA activity. PrfA activity therefore seems to depend on a fully functional PTS phosphorylation cascade.

Activation of the LicT Transcriptional Antiterminator Involves a Domain Swing/Lock Mechanism Provoking Massive Structural Changes

The transcriptional antiterminator protein LicT regulates the expression of Bacillus subtilis operons involved in beta-glucoside metabolism. It consists of an N-terminal RNA-binding domain (co-antiterminator (CAT)) and two phosphorylatable phosphotransferase system regulation domains (PRD1 and PRD2). In the activated state, each PRD forms a dimeric unit with the phosphorylation sites totally buried at the dimer interface. Here we present the 1.95 A resolution structure of the inactive LicT PRDs as well as the molecular solution structure of the full-length protein deduced from small angle x-ray scattering. Comparison of native (inactive) and mutant (constitutively active) PRD crystal structures shows massive tertiary and quaternary rearrangements of the entire regulatory domain. In the inactive state, a wide swing movement of PRD2 results in dimer opening and brings the phosphorylation sites to the protein surface. This movement is accompanied by additional structural rearrangements of both the PRD1-PRD1 ' interface and the CAT-PRD1 linker. Small angle x-ray scattering experiments indicate that the amplitude of the PRD2 swing might even be wider in solution than in the crystals. Our results suggest that PRD2 is highly mobile in the native protein, whereas it is locked upon activation by phosphorylation.

Control of the Bacillus subtilis Antiterminator Protein GlcT by Phosphorylation

Bacillus subtilis transports glucose by the phosphotransferase system (PTS). The genes for this system are encoded in the ptsGHI operon, which is induced by glucose and depends on a termination/antitermination mechanism involving a riboswitch and the RNA-binding antitermination protein GlcT. In the absence of glucose, GlcT is inactive, and a terminator is formed in the leader region of the ptsG mRNA. If glucose is present, GlcT can bind to its RNA target and prevent transcription termination. The GlcT protein is composed of three domains, an N-terminal RNA binding domain and two PTS regulation domains, PTS regulation domain (PRD) I and PRD-II. In this work, we demonstrate that GlcT can be phosphorylated by two PTS proteins, HPr and the glucose-specific enzyme II (EIIGlc). HPr-dependent phosphorylation occurs on PRD-II and has a slight stimulatory effect on GlcT activity. In contrast, EIIGlc phosphorylates the PRD-I of GlcT, and this phosphorylation inactivates GlcT. This latter phosphorylation event links the availability of glucose to the expression of the ptsGHI operon via the phosphorylation state of EIIGlc and GlcT. This is the first in vitro demonstration of a direct phosphorylation of an antiterminator of the BglG family by the corresponding PTS permease.