1
|
Thomas JK, Clark J, Arora V, Burgess DS, Burgess DR, Mynatt RP, VanHoose JD, Wallace KL, Cotner SE. Performance of ePlex® blood culture identification panels in clinical isolates and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2024; 109:116269. [PMID: 38692201 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
We assessed the performance of GenMark's ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for overall agreement of organism identification and resistance mechanism detection with standard microbiologic methods. This study included patients with a positive blood culture from May 2020 to January 2021. The primary outcomes were to assess concordance of ePlex® organism identification with standard identification methods and concordance of ePlex® genotypic resistance mechanism detection with standard phenotypic susceptibility testing. Secondary outcomes included panel specific performance and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities. The overall identification concordance rate in 1276 positive blood cultures was 98.1%. The overall concordance for the presence of resistance markers was 98.2% and concordance for the absence of resistance markers was 100%. A majority of ePlex® results (69.5%) represented opportunities for potential antimicrobial stewardship intervention. High concordance rates between the ePlex® BCID panels and standard identification and susceptibility methods enable utilization of results to guide rapid antimicrobial optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenni K Thomas
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Justin Clark
- University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Vaneet Arora
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - David S Burgess
- University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Donna R Burgess
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA; University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Ryan P Mynatt
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jeremy D VanHoose
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Katie L Wallace
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA; University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Sarah E Cotner
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA; University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caspar Y, Deves A, Richarme C, Le Marechal M, Ponderand L, Mounayar AL, Lejeune S, Arata-Bardet J, Gallouche M, Recule C, Maubon D, Garnaud C, Cornet M, Veloso M, Chabani B, Maurin M, David-Tchouda S, Pavese P. Clinical impact and cost-consequence analysis of ePlex® blood culture identification panels for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2024; 43:1193-1203. [PMID: 38536524 PMCID: PMC11178566 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-024-04820-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
To assess clinical impact and perform cost-consequence analysis of the broadest multiplex PCR panels available for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2019 to February 2021 at a French University hospital with an institutional antimicrobial stewardship program. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with optimized antimicrobial treatment 12 h after transmission of positivity and Gram stain results from the first positive BC. This percentage was significantly higher in the multiplex PCR (mPCR) group (90/105 = 85.7% %, CI95% [77.5 ; 91.8] vs. 68/107 = 63.6%, CI95% [53.7 ; 72.6]; p < 10- 3) at interim analysis, resulting in the early termination of the study after the inclusion of 309 patients. For patients not optimized at baseline, the median time to obtain an optimized therapy was much shorter in the mPCR group than in the control group (6.9 h, IQR [2.9; 17.8] vs. 26.4 h, IQR [3.4; 47.5]; p = 0.001). Early optimization of antibiotic therapy resulted in a non-statistically significant decrease in mortality from 12.4 to 8.8% (p = 0.306), with a trend towards a shorter median length of stay (18 vs. 20 days; p = 0.064) and a non-significant reduction in the average cost per patient of €3,065 (p = 0.15). mPCR identified all the bacteria present in 88% of the samples. Despite its higher laboratory cost, the use of multiplex PCR for BSI diagnosis leads to early-optimised therapy, seems cost-effective and could reduce mortality and length of stay. Their impact could probably be improved if implemented 24/7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvan Caspar
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CEA, IBS, Grenoble, 38000, France.
| | - A Deves
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - C Richarme
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - M Le Marechal
- Service des Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - L Ponderand
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CEA, IBS, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - A-L Mounayar
- Service des Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - S Lejeune
- Service des Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - J Arata-Bardet
- Service des Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - M Gallouche
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, Grenoble, 38000, France
- Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - C Recule
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - D Maubon
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - C Garnaud
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - M Cornet
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - M Veloso
- Cellule d'ingénierie des données, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - B Chabani
- Unité d'évaluation médico-économique, Pôle Santé Publique, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - M Maurin
- Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - S David-Tchouda
- Unité d'évaluation médico-économique, Pôle Santé Publique, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- CIC 1406 Grenoble, INSERM, Grenoble, 38000, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, TIMC-Imag UMR 5525, Grenoble, 38000, France
| | - P Pavese
- Service des Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gopikrishnan M, Haryini S, C GPD. Emerging strategies and therapeutic innovations for combating drug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains: A comprehensive review. J Basic Microbiol 2024; 64:e2300579. [PMID: 38308076 DOI: 10.1002/jobm.202300579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, antibiotic therapy has encountered significant challenges due to the rapid emergence of multidrug resistance among bacteria responsible for life-threatening illnesses, creating uncertainty about the future management of infectious diseases. The escalation of antimicrobial resistance in the post-COVID era compared to the pre-COVID era has raised global concern. The prevalence of nosocomial-related infections, especially outbreaks of drug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, have been reported worldwide, with India being a notable hotspot for such occurrences. Various virulence factors and mutations characterize nosocomial infections involving S. aureus. The lack of proper alternative treatments leading to increased drug resistance emphasizes the need to investigate and examine recent research to combat future pandemics. In the current genomics era, the application of advanced technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), machine learning (ML), and quantum computing (QC) for genomic analysis and resistance prediction has significantly increased the pace of diagnosing drug-resistant pathogens and insights into genetic intricacies. Despite prompt diagnosis, the elimination of drug-resistant infections remains unattainable in the absence of effective alternative therapies. Researchers are exploring various alternative therapeutic approaches, including phage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, photodynamic therapy, vaccines, host-directed therapies, and more. The proposed review mainly focuses on the resistance journey of S. aureus over the past decade, detailing its resistance mechanisms, prevalence in the subcontinent, innovations in rapid diagnosis of the drug-resistant strains, including the applicants of NGS and ML application along with QC, it helps to design alternative novel therapeutics approaches against S. aureus infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohanraj Gopikrishnan
- Department of Integrative Biology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Sree Haryini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - George Priya Doss C
- Department of Integrative Biology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cox CR, Weghorn KN, Ruger K, Powers-Fletcher MV, Powell EA, Mortensen JE. Clinical utility of multiplex PCR in the detection of pathogens from sterile body fluids. J Clin Microbiol 2024; 62:e0161123. [PMID: 38470149 PMCID: PMC11005351 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01611-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Rapid identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is essential for appropriate patient management, specifically antimicrobial therapy. Limited sensitivity and increased time to detection of traditional culture prompted us to evaluate additional testing to contribute to the diagnosis of infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels on positive body fluids inoculated into blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms. A total of 88 positive body fluids from blood culture bottles were analyzed using a Gram-Positive, Gram-Negative, and/or Fungal pathogen BCID Panel based on the Gram stain result. Each result was compared to routine culture performed from the positive bottle. When using culture as a reference standard, we found the ePlex multiplex panel performed with a positive percent agreement of 96.5% and a negative percent agreement of 99.8%. The use of multiplex PCR may be a useful supplement to routine culture for NSBF in blood culture bottles. IMPORTANCE The identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is performed using routine culture, the current gold standard. Limitations of this method include sensitivity and increased turnaround times which could potentially delay vital patient care, especially antimicrobial therapy. Adaptations of NSBF in blood culture bottles prompted us to consider the utility of additional methods to bridge the gap in diagnostic challenges for these life-threatening infections. Multiplex molecular panels have been manufactured for use with multiple specimen types including blood, cerebral spinal fluid, stool, and respiratory. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the off-label use of ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels on positive body fluids grown in blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms for research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina R. Cox
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Kristin N. Weghorn
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Katie Ruger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Margaret V. Powers-Fletcher
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Eleanor A. Powell
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Joel E. Mortensen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Turbett SE, Banach DB, Bard JD, Gandhi RG, Letourneau AR, Azar MM. Rapid antimicrobial resistance detection methods for bloodstream infection in solid organ transplantation: Proposed clinical guidance, unmet needs, and future directions. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14113. [PMID: 37594214 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in antimicrobial resistance detection have spurred the development of multiple assays that can accurately detect the presence of bacterial resistance from positive blood cultures, resulting in faster institution of effective antimicrobial therapy. Despite these advances, there are limited data regarding the use of these assays in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and there is little guidance on how to select, implement, and interpret them in clinical practice. We describe a practical approach to the implementation and interpretation of these assays in SOT recipients using the best available data and expert opinion. These findings were part of a consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation held on December 7, 2021 and represent the collaboration between experts in transplant infectious diseases, pharmacy, antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship, and clinical microbiology. Areas of unmet need and recommendations for future investigation are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Turbett
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David B Banach
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jennifer Dien Bard
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ronak G Gandhi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alyssa R Letourneau
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marwan M Azar
- Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin C, Tang H, Hu X, Li G, Jiang T, Yang W, Xia Z, Zhu Y, Xu H, Zhou J, Shen J. A PCR-Reverse Dot Blot Hybridization Based Microfluidics Detection System for the Rapid Identification of 13 Fungal Pathogens Directly After Blood Cultures Over a Period of Time. Infect Drug Resist 2023; 16:5347-5357. [PMID: 37605759 PMCID: PMC10440108 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s424156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction It is time-consuming to identify fungal pathogens from positive blood cultures using the standard culture-based method. And delayed diagnosis of bloodstream infection leads to significantly increased mortality. Methods We developed a PCR-reverse dot blot hybridization combined with microfluidic chip techniques to rapidly identify 13 fungal pathogens within 3-4 h using the sample of blood cultured over a period of time. Results We performed clinical validation using 43 blood culture-positive samples with a sensitivity of 96.7%, a specificity of 100%, and a concordance rate of 97.7%. Samples with different culture durations were evaluated using our approach, showing a detection rate of 85.2% at 16 h and 96.3% at 24 h; the platform could reach a detection limit of 103cfu/mL for the Candida spp. and 103 copies/mL for Aspergillus spp. Discussion The detection rate of the platform is much higher than the positive rates of concurrent blood cultures. This method bears substantial clinical application potential as it incorporates the microfluidic platform with low reagent consumption, automation, and low cost (about 10 dollars).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhui Lin
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hao Tang
- Clinical Laboratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xinyi Hu
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ge Li
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tong Jiang
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wensu Yang
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhaoxin Xia
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi Zhu
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Huaming Xu
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jilu Shen
- Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Laboratory, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center Hefei, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chatelard PA, Rousseau N, Parmeland L, Metral P, Pariset C, Vivier E. Shortening identification times: comparative observational study of three early blood culture testing protocols. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1192002. [PMID: 37533929 PMCID: PMC10390722 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1192002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While early appropriate antibiotic therapy is a proven means of limiting the progression of infections, especially bacteremia, empirical antibiotic therapy in sepsis is ineffective up to 30%. The aim of this study was to compare early blood culture testing protocols in terms of their ability to shorten the delay between blood sampling and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Methods In this french observational study, we compared three blood culture testing protocols. Positive blood cultures were tested using either GenMark ePlex panels (multiplex PCR period), a combination of MRSA/SA PCR, β-Lacta and oxidase tests (multitest period), or conventional identification and susceptibility tests only (reference period). Conventional identification and susceptibility tests were performed in parallel for all samples, as the gold standard. Results Among the 270 patients with positive blood cultures included, early and conventional results were in good agreement, especially for the multitest period. The delay between a blood culture positivity and initial results was 3.8 (2.9-6.9) h in the multiplex PCR period, 2.6 (1.3-4.5) h in the multitest period and 3.7 (1.8-8.2) h in the reference period (p<0.01). Antibiotic therapy was initiated or adjusted in 68 patients based on early analysis results. The proportion of patients receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy within 48 h of blood sampling was higher in the multiplex PCR and multitest periods, (respectively 90% and 88%) than in the reference period (71%). Conclusion These results suggest rapid bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance tests are feasible, efficient and can expedite appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathalie Rousseau
- Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Laboratoire de biologie médicale, Lyon, France
| | - Laurence Parmeland
- Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Laboratoire de biologie médicale, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Metral
- Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Département d’Information Médicale, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Pariset
- Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Maladies Infectieuses, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Vivier
- Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Lyon, France
- Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mizusawa M, Carroll KC. Recent updates in the development of molecular assays for the rapid identification and susceptibility testing of MRSA. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2023; 23:679-699. [PMID: 37419696 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2234823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent cause of healthcare- and community-associated infections. Nasal carriage of MRSA is a risk factor for subsequent MRSA infections. Increased morbidity and mortality are associated with MRSA infections and screening and diagnostic tests for MRSA play an important role in clinical management. AREAS COVERED A literature search was conducted in PubMed and supplemented by citation searching. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of molecular-based methods for MRSA screening and diagnostic tests including individual nucleic acid detection assays, syndromic panels, and sequencing technologies with a focus on their analytical performance. EXPERT OPINION Molecular based-assays for the detection of MRSA have improved in terms of accuracy and availability. Rapid turnaround enables earlier contact isolation and decolonization for MRSA. The availability of syndromic panel tests that include MRSA as a target has expanded from positive blood cultures to pneumonia and osteoarticular infections. Sequencing technologies allow detailed characterizations of novel methicillin-resistance mechanisms that can be incorporated into future assays. Next generation sequencing is capable of diagnosing MRSA infections that cannot be identified by conventional methods and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) assays will likely move closer to implementation as front-line diagnostics in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masako Mizusawa
- Monmouth Medical Center, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Long Branch, NJ, USA
| | - Karen C Carroll
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fang W, Wu J, Cheng M, Zhu X, Du M, Chen C, Liao W, Zhi K, Pan W. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: challenges and recent developments. J Biomed Sci 2023; 30:42. [PMID: 37337179 DOI: 10.1186/s12929-023-00926-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has shown an upsurge in recent years due to the higher load of immunocompromised patients suffering from various diseases. The role of early and accurate diagnosis in the aggressive containment of the fungal infection at the initial stages becomes crucial thus, preventing the development of a life-threatening situation. With the changing demands of clinical mycology, the field of fungal diagnostics has evolved and come a long way from traditional methods of microscopy and culturing to more advanced non-culture-based tools. With the advent of more powerful approaches such as novel PCR assays, T2 Candida, microfluidic chip technology, next generation sequencing, new generation biosensors, nanotechnology-based tools, artificial intelligence-based models, the face of fungal diagnostics is constantly changing for the better. All these advances have been reviewed here giving the latest update to our readers in the most orderly flow. MAIN TEXT A detailed literature survey was conducted by the team followed by data collection, pertinent data extraction, in-depth analysis, and composing the various sub-sections and the final review. The review is unique in its kind as it discusses the advances in molecular methods; advances in serology-based methods; advances in biosensor technology; and advances in machine learning-based models, all under one roof. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no review covering all of these fields (especially biosensor technology and machine learning using artificial intelligence) with relevance to invasive fungal infections. CONCLUSION The review will undoubtedly assist in updating the scientific community's understanding of the most recent advancements that are on the horizon and that may be implemented as adjuncts to the traditional diagnostic algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Fang
- Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Junqi Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Lung Transplantation, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Mingrong Cheng
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, 558000, China
| | - Xinlin Zhu
- Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Mingwei Du
- Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Chang Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Lung Transplantation, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Wanqing Liao
- Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Kangkang Zhi
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| | - Weihua Pan
- Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Siciliano V, Passerotto RA, Chiuchiarelli M, Leanza GM, Ojetti V. Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens: A Review on the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13051126. [PMID: 37240771 DOI: 10.3390/life13051126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MDRSE) is responsible for difficult-to-treat infections in humans and hospital-acquired-infections. This review discusses the epidemiology, microbiology, diagnosis, and treatment of MDRSE infection and identifies knowledge gaps. By using the search term "pan resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis" OR "multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis" OR "multidrug-resistant lineages of Staphylococcus epidermidis", a total of 64 records have been identified from various previously published studies. The proportion of methicillin resistance in S. epidermidis has been reported to be as high as 92%. Several studies across the world have aimed to detect the main phylogenetic lineages and antibiotically resistant genes through culture, mass spectrometry, and genomic analysis. Molecular biology tools are now available for the identification of S. epidermidis and its drug resistance mechanisms, especially in blood cultures. However, understanding the distinction between a simple colonization and a bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by S. epidermidis is still a challenge for clinicians. Some important parameters to keep in mind are the number of positive samples, the symptoms and signs of the patient, the comorbidities of the patient, the presence of central venous catheter (CVC) or other medical device, and the resistance phenotype of the organism. The agent of choice for empiric parenteral therapy is vancomycin. Other treatment options, depending on different clinical settings, may include teicoplanin, daptomycin, oxazolidinones, long-acting lipoglycopeptides, and ceftaroline. For patients with S. epidermidis infections associated with the presence of an indwelling device, assessment regarding whether the device warrants removal is an important component of management. This study provides an overview of the MDRSE infection. Further studies are needed to explore and establish the most correct form of management of this infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Siciliano
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Anna Passerotto
- Dipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Chiuchiarelli
- Dipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Maria Leanza
- Dipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Veronica Ojetti
- Dipartimento di Emergenza e Accettazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Test Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0409222. [PMID: 36688641 PMCID: PMC9927486 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04092-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The test performance and potential clinical utility of the ePlex blood culture identification Gram-negative (BCID-GN) panel was evaluated relative to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry on bacterial isolates and conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The majority (106/108, 98.1%) of GN bacteria identified by MALDI were on the BCID-GN panel, and valid tests (107/108, 99.1%) yielded results on average 26.7 h earlier. For all valid tests with on-panel organisms, the positive percent agreement was 102/105 (97.2%) with 3 false negatives and the negative percent agreement was 105/105. Chart review (n = 98) showed that in conjunction with Gram stain results, negative pan-Gram-positive (GP) markers provided the opportunity to discontinue GP antibiotic coverage in 63/98 (64.3%) cases on average 26.2 h earlier. Only 8/12 (66.7%) Enterobacterales isolates with resistance to third-generation cephalosporins harbored the CTX-M gene. In contrast, 8/8 CTX-M+ samples yielded a resistant isolate. Detection of 1 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (18 h), 1 OXA23/48+ Acinetobacter baumannii (52.4 h), and 3 CTX-M+ Enterobacterales isolates on ineffective treatment (47.1 h) and 1 on suboptimal therapy (72.6 h) would have additionally enabled early antimicrobial optimization in 6/98 (6.1%) patients. IMPORTANCE The GenMark Dx ePlex rapid blood culture diagnostic system enables earlier time to identification of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing bloodstream infections. Its ability to rule out Gram-positive bacteria enabled early discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotics in 63/98 (64.3%) cases on average 26.2 h earlier. Detection of bacteria harboring the CTX-M gene as well as early identification of highly resistant bacteria such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii enabled optimization of ineffective therapy in 6/98 (6.1%) patients. Its implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories optimizes therapy and improves patient care.
Collapse
|
12
|
Fast Track Diagnostic Tools for Clinical Management of Sepsis: Paradigm Shift from Conventional to Advanced Methods. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13020277. [PMID: 36673087 PMCID: PMC9857847 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the deadliest disorders in the new century due to specific limitations in early and differential diagnosis. Moreover, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is becoming the dominant threat to human health globally. The only way to encounter the spread and emergence of AMR is through the active detection and identification of the pathogen along with the quantification of resistance. For better management of such disease, there is an essential requirement to approach many suitable diagnostic techniques for the proper administration of antibiotics and elimination of these infectious diseases. The current method employed for the diagnosis of sepsis relies on the conventional culture of blood suspected infection. However, this method is more time consuming and generates results that are false negative in the case of antibiotic pretreated samples as well as slow-growing microbes. In comparison to the conventional method, modern methods are capable of analyzing blood samples, obtaining accurate results from the suspicious patient of sepsis, and giving all the necessary information to identify the pathogens as well as AMR in a short period. The present review is intended to highlight the culture shift from conventional to modern and advanced technologies including their limitations for the proper and prompt diagnosing of bloodstream infections and AMR detection.
Collapse
|
13
|
Azar MM, Turbett S, Gaston D, Gitman M, Razonable R, Koo S, Hanson K, Kotton C, Silveira F, Banach DB, Basu SS, Bhaskaran A, Danziger-Isakov L, Bard JD, Gandhi R, Hanisch B, John TM, Odom John AR, Letourneau AR, Luong ML, Maron G, Miller S, Prinzi A, Schwartz I, Simner P, Kumar D. A consensus conference to define the utility of advanced infectious disease diagnostics in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:3150-3169. [PMID: 35822346 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The last decade has seen an explosion of advanced assays for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, yet evidence-based recommendations to inform their optimal use in the care of transplant recipients are lacking. A consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) was convened on December 7, 2021, to define the utility of novel infectious disease diagnostics in organ transplant recipients. The conference represented a collaborative effort by experts in transplant infectious diseases, diagnostic stewardship, and clinical microbiology from centers across North America to evaluate current uses, unmet needs, and future directions for assays in 5 categories including (1) multiplex molecular assays, (2) rapid antimicrobial resistance detection methods, (3) pathogen-specific T-cell reactivity assays, (4) next-generation sequencing assays, and (5) mass spectrometry-based assays. Participants reviewed and appraised available literature, determined assay advantages and limitations, developed best practice guidance largely based on expert opinion for clinical use, and identified areas of future investigation in the setting of transplantation. In addition, attendees emphasized the need for well-designed studies to generate high-quality evidence needed to guide care, identified regulatory and financial barriers, and discussed the role of regulatory agencies in facilitating research and implementation of these assays. Findings and consensus statements are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwan M Azar
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah Turbett
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Gaston
- John's Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Melissa Gitman
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Sophia Koo
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimberly Hanson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Camille Kotton
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fernanda Silveira
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David B Banach
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sankha S Basu
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer Dien Bard
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ronak Gandhi
- Department of Pharmacy Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin Hanisch
- Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Teny M John
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Audrey R Odom John
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alyssa R Letourneau
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Me-Linh Luong
- Department of Microbiology, University of Montreal, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Gabriela Maron
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Steve Miller
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrea Prinzi
- Infectious Disease Medical Science Liaison, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Ilan Schwartz
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Patricia Simner
- John's Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0179622. [PMID: 36069598 PMCID: PMC9602361 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01796-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Rapid identification of pathogens is critical in bloodstream infections. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels and the adoption of the ePlex system into the clinical laboratory workflow. Nonduplicate remnant specimens of positive blood cultures were prospectively tested using ePlex panels between January and March 2020. A total of 313 unique positive blood culture specimens were tested. The identified organisms consisted of 98 Gram-negative rods (GNR), 90 Gram-positive cocci (GPC) in clusters, 62 GPC in chains, 21 Gram-positive rods, and 20 yeasts; 22 organisms were off panel. The positive percent agreement was 100% across all organisms tested after discordancy resolution, while the negative percent agreement was 100% across all targets except Corynebacterium spp., where it was 99.7%. The ePlex BCID panels accurately detected 5 pan targets and 42 antimicrobial resistance gene markers, including 31 mecA, 4 vanA, 6 CTX-M, and 1 KPC gene. The median times to result were calculated as 2.5 h for Xpert MRSA/SA in GPC in clusters, 9.5 h for Accelerate Pheno (identification and susceptibility) in GNR, 6 h for peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization [PNA-FISH] in yeasts, 27 h for the latex agglutination test in S. aureus, 29 h for Lancefield serotyping in GPC in chains, and 29 h for Vitek-MS in GNR. In our laboratory, the ePlex panels could substantially reduce the time to result for bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Candida spp. The highly accurate ePlex panels can help streamline laboratory efficiency in the blood bench workflow, reducing the time to result for identification of BSI pathogens. IMPORTANCE Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Rapid identification of the causative agent is of critical importance for the prompt initiation of the appropriate antibiotic treatment. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels and their adoption into the clinical laboratory workflow. We prospectively tested 313 blood culture isolates and found that ePlex BCID panels had a positive percent agreement of 100% across all organisms tested after discordancy resolution. The negative percent agreement was 100% across all targets except Corynebacterium spp., where it was 99.7%. This new rapid technology (turnaround time of ~90 min) can help streamline laboratory efficiency in the blood bench workflow, reducing the time to result for identification of BSI pathogens. Adoption should be individualized based on the needs of the patient population and capabilities of the laboratory.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kuo P, LeCrone K, Chiu M, Realegeno S, Pride DT. Analysis of the FAST™ System for expedited identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bloodborne pathogens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 104:115783. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
16
|
Analytical Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive Panel. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 104:115762. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
17
|
Recent Developments in Phenotypic and Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Antimicrobial Resistance Detection in Staphylococcus aureus: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12010208. [PMID: 35054375 PMCID: PMC8774325 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen responsible for a wide range of infections in humans, such as skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia, food poisoning or sepsis. Historically, S. aureus was able to rapidly adapt to anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and become resistant to several classes of antibiotics. Today, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a multidrug-resistant pathogen and is one of the most common bacteria responsible for hospital-acquired infections and outbreaks, in community settings as well. The rapid and accurate diagnosis of antimicrobial resistance in S. aureus is crucial to the early initiation of directed antibiotic therapy and to improve clinical outcomes for patients. In this narrative review, I provide an overview of recent phenotypic and molecular diagnostic methods for antimicrobial resistance detection in S. aureus, with a particular focus on MRSA detection. I consider methods for resistance detection in both clinical samples and isolated S. aureus cultures, along with a brief discussion of the advantages and the challenges of implementing such methods in routine diagnostics.
Collapse
|
18
|
Mendonça A, Santos H, Franco-Duarte R, Sampaio P. Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future. Res Microbiol 2022; 173:103915. [PMID: 34863883 PMCID: PMC8634697 DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2021.103915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite the scientific advances observed in the recent decades and the emergence of new methodologies, the diagnosis of systemic fungal infections persists as a problematic issue. Fungal cultivation, the standard method that allows a proven diagnosis, has numerous disadvantages, as low sensitivity (only 50% of the patients present positive fungal cultures), and long growth time. These are factors that delay the patient's treatment and, consequently, lead to higher hospital costs. To improve the accuracy and quickness of fungal infections diagnosis, several new methodologies attempt to be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories. Most of these innovative methods are independent of pathogen isolation, which means that the diagnosis goes from being considered proven to probable. In spite of the advantage of being culture-independent, the majority of the methods lack standardization. PCR-based methods are becoming more and more commonly used, which has earned them an important place in hospital laboratories. This can be perceived now, as PCR-based methodologies have proved to be an essential tool fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to go through the main steps of the diagnosis for systemic fungal infection, from diagnostic classifications, through methodologies considered as "gold standard", to the molecular methods currently used, and finally mentioning some of the more futuristic approaches.
Collapse
|
19
|
Xia J, Xia L, Zhou H, Lin X, Xu F. Empyema caused by Streptococcus constellatus: a case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:1267. [PMID: 34930151 PMCID: PMC8686261 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06955-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Streptococcus constellatus is a member of Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) that tends to cause pyogenic infections in various sites. However, Streptococcus constellatus is easily ignored by routine clinical laboratory tests for its prolonged anaerobic culture environment. Case presentation A 71-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to productive cough, fever, chest pain and shortness of breath for 3 weeks. Chest computed tomography showed patchy opacities and right-sided pleural effusion, so a chest tube was inserted and purulent and hemorrhagic fluid was aspirated. The routine etiological examinations of the pleural effusion were all negative, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) detected Streptococcus constellatus. Intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 h was used accordingly. The patient recovered and subsequent chest computed tomography confirmed the improvement. Conclusions We reported a case of empyema secondary to Streptococcus constellatus infection, which was identified by NGS, instead of bacterial culture. This case highlights the utility of NGS in detecting pathogens negative in traditional bacterial tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyan Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Lexin Xia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Hui Zhou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Xiuhui Lin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Feng Xu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Garner CD, Brazelton de Cardenas J, Suganda S, Hayden RT. Accuracy of Broad-Panel PCR-Based Bacterial Identification for Blood Cultures in a Pediatric Oncology Population. Microbiol Spectr 2021; 9:e0022121. [PMID: 34232100 PMCID: PMC8552719 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00221-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Bloodstream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and result in significant costs to health care systems. Rapid identification of the causative agent of bloodstream infections is critical for patient treatment and improved outcomes. Multiplex PCR systems that provide bacterial identification directly from the blood culture bottle allow for earlier detection of pathogens. The GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels have an expanded number of targets for both identification and genotypic markers of antimicrobial resistance. The performance of the ePlex BCID Gram-negative (GN) and Gram-positive (GP) panels were evaluated in a predominantly pediatric oncology population. A total of 112 blood cultures were tested by the ePlex BCID GN and GP panels and results were compared to those from standard-of-care testing. Accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% (CI, 76% to 95%) for the Gram-positive panel, with four misidentifications and one not detected, and 93% (CI, 82% to 98%) for the Gram-negative panel, with two misidentifications and one not detected. The results showed good overall performance of these panels for rapid, accurate detection of bloodstream pathogens in this high-risk population. IMPORTANCE Bloodstream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and result in significant costs to health care systems. Rapid identification of the causative agent of bloodstream infections is critical for patient treatment and improved outcomes. Multiplex PCR systems that provide bacterial identification directly from the blood culture bottle allow for earlier characterization of pathogens. The GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels, recently cleared by the FDA, have an expanded number of targets for both identification and resistance, much larger than other, automated, broad-panel PCR assays. The performance of the ePlex BCID Gram-negative and Gram-positive panels was evaluated in a predominantly pediatric oncology population, providing a unique look at its performance in a high-risk group, where rapid diagnostic information for bloodstream infections could be of particular value for clinical care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. D. Garner
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - S. Suganda
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - R. T. Hayden
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59:e0248420. [PMID: 34232066 PMCID: PMC8373019 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02484-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial resistance genes. We report the results of a multicenter clinical study assessing the performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only blood culture identification Gram-negative panel (BCID-GN), a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of bloodstream pathogens in positive blood culture (PBC) bottles. Prospective, retrospective, and contrived samples were tested. Results from the BCID-GN were compared to standard-of-care bacterial identification methods. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were identified using PCR and sequence analysis. The final BCID-GN analysis included 2,444 PBC samples, of which 926 were clinical samples with negative Gram stain results. Of these, 109 samples had false-negative and/or -positive results, resulting in an overall sample accuracy of 88.2% (817/926). After discordant resolution, overall sample accuracy increased to 92.9% (860/926). Pre- and postdiscordant resolution sample accuracy excludes 37 Gram-negative organisms representing 20 uncommon genera, 10 Gram-positive organisms, and 1 Candida species present in 5% of samples that are not targeted by the BCID-GN. The overall weighted positive percent agreement (PPA), which averages the individual PPAs from the 27 targets (Gram-negative and ARG), was 94.9%. The limit of detection ranged from 104 to 107 CFU/ml, except for one strain of Fusobacterium necrophorum at 108 CFU/ml.
Collapse
|
22
|
Comparing the Clinical Utility of Rapid Diagnostics for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Using Desirability of Outcome Ranking Approach for the Management of Antibiotic Therapy (DOOR-MAT). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65:e0044121. [PMID: 34228533 PMCID: PMC8370220 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00441-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Decisions regarding which rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for bloodstream infections to implement remain challenging given the diversity of organisms detected by different platforms. We used the desirability of outcome ranking management of antimicrobial therapy (DOOR-MAT) as a framework to compare two RDT platforms on potential desirability of antimicrobial therapy decisions. An observational study was performed at University of Maryland Medical System comparing Verigene blood culture (BC) to GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture ID (BCID) (research use only) panels on blood cultures from adult patients. Positive percent agreement (PPA) between each RDT platform and Vitek MS was calculated for comparison of on-panel targets. Theoretical antimicrobial decisions were made based on RDT results, taking into consideration patient parameters, antimicrobial stewardship practices, and local infectious diseases epidemiology. DOOR-MAT with a partial credit scoring system was applied to these decisions, and mean scores were compared across platforms using a paired t test. The study consisted of 160 unique patients. The Verigene BC PPA was 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.1 to 99.8), and ePlex BCID PPA was 98% (95% CI, 94.3 to 99.6). Among the 31 organisms not on the Verigene BC panels, 61% were identified by the ePlex BCID panels. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) DOOR-MAT score for Verigene BC was 86.8 (28.5), while that for ePlex BCID was 91.9 (23.1) (P = 0.01). Both RDT platforms had high PPA for on-panel targets. The ePlex BCID was able to identify more organisms than Verigene, resulting in higher mean DOOR-MAT scores.
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Jacobs MR, Colson JD, Rhoads DD. Recent advances in rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2021; 21:563-578. [PMID: 33926351 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1924679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Until recently antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods based on the demonstration of phenotypic susceptibility in 16-24 h remained largely unchanged. AREAS COVERED Advances in rapid phenotypic and molecular-based AST systems. EXPERT OPINION AST has changed over the past decade, with many rapid phenotypic and molecular methods developed to demonstrate phenotypic or genotypic resistance, or biochemical markers of resistance such as β-lactamases associated with carbapenem resistance. Most methods still require isolation of bacteria from specimens before both legacy and newer methods can be used. Bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy is now widely used and is often key to the interpretation of rapid AST results. Several PCR arrays are available to detect the most frequent pathogens associated with bloodstream infections and their major antimicrobial resistance genes. Many advances in whole-genome sequencing of bacteria and fungi isolated by culture as well as directly from clinical specimens have been made but are not yet widely available. High cost and limited throughput are the major obstacles to uptake of rapid methods, but targeted use, continued development and decreasing costs are expected to result in more extensive use of these increasingly useful methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Jacobs
- Emeritus Professor of Pathology and Emeritus Medical Director, Clinical Microbiology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jordan D Colson
- Microbiology Fellow, Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel D Rhoads
- Section Head of Microbiology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Banerjee R, Humphries R. Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Blood Cultures and Their Clinical Impact. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:635831. [PMID: 33777978 PMCID: PMC7987685 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.635831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria isolated in blood cultures is critical for optimal management of patients with sepsis. This review describes new and emerging phenotypic and genotypic AST methods and summarizes the evidence that implementation of these methods can impact clinical outcomes of patients with bloodstream infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Banerjee
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Romney Humphries
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
White PL, Price JS, Cordey A, Backx M. Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections. CURRENT FUNGAL INFECTION REPORTS 2021; 15:67-80. [PMID: 34178207 PMCID: PMC8212580 DOI: 10.1007/s12281-021-00421-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of molecular tests to aid the diagnosis of invasive yeast infection, in particular invasive candidosis, has been described for over two decades, yet widespread application is limited, and diagnosis remains heavily dependent on classical microbiology. This article will review developments from the past decade in attempt to build on existing knowledge. It will highlight clinical performance and limitations while reviewing developments on recognized procedures; it will also provide insight into novel approaches incorporated in response to clinical demand (e.g. C. auris and antifungal resistance) or technological advances (e.g. next-generation sequencing). RECENT FINDINGS Limited methodological standardization and, until recently, unavailability of commercial options have hindered the integration of molecular diagnostics for yeasts. The development of certain, novel commercial methods has received considerable evaluation allowing a greater understanding of individual assay performance, but widespread multicentre evaluation of most commercial kits is lacking. The detection of emerging pathogens (e.g. C. auris) has been enhanced by the development of molecular tests. Molecular methods are providing a better understanding of the mycobiome, mechanisms of resistance and epidemiology/phylogeny. SUMMARY Despite over two decades of use, the incorporation of molecular methods to enhance the diagnosis of yeast infections remains limited to certain specialist centres. While the development of commercial tests will provide stimulus for broader application, further validation and reduced costs are required. Over the same period of time, Aspergillus PCR has become more widely accepted driven by international efforts to standardize methodology; it is critical that yeast PCR follows suit. Next-generation sequencing will provide significant information on the mycobiome, antifungal resistance mechanism and even broad-range detection directly from the specimen, which may be critical for the molecular detection of yeasts other than Candida species, which is currently limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Lewis White
- grid.241103.50000 0001 0169 7725Mycology Reference Laboratory, Public Health Wales, Microbiology Cardiff, UHW, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW UK
| | - Jessica S. Price
- grid.241103.50000 0001 0169 7725Mycology Reference Laboratory, Public Health Wales, Microbiology Cardiff, UHW, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW UK
| | - Alan Cordey
- grid.241103.50000 0001 0169 7725Mycology Reference Laboratory, Public Health Wales, Microbiology Cardiff, UHW, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW UK
| | - Matthijs Backx
- grid.241103.50000 0001 0169 7725Mycology Reference Laboratory, Public Health Wales, Microbiology Cardiff, UHW, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bryant S, Almahmoud I, Pierre I, Bardet J, Touati S, Maubon D, Cornet M, Richarme C, Maurin M, Pavese P, Caspar Y. Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex ® Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:594951. [PMID: 33324578 PMCID: PMC7726344 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.594951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular rapid diagnostic assays associated with antimicrobial stewardship have proven effective for the early adaptation of empiric therapy in bloodstream infections. The ePlex® BCID (GenMark Diagnostics) Panels allow identification of 56 bacteria and fungi and 10 resistance genes in 90 min directly from positive blood cultures. We prospectively evaluated 187 sepsis episodes at Grenoble University Hospital and retrospectively analyzed the cases to measure the potential clinical impact of the ePlex BCID results. Identification of all pathogens was obtained for 164/187 (88%) bloodstream infections with 100% detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (17 blaCTX-M , 1 vanA, and 17 mecA genes). Only 15/209 (7%) strains were not covered by the panels. Sensitivity for detection of micro-organisms targeted by the RUO BCID-GP, BCID-GN, and BCID-FP Panels was respectively 84/84 (100%), 103/107 (96%), and 14/14 (100%). Interestingly, accurate identification of all pathogens was achieved in 15/17 (88%) polymicrobial samples. Retrospective analysis of medical records showed that a modification of antimicrobial treatment would have been done in 45% of the patients. Treatment modifications would have been an optimization of empiric therapy, a de-escalation or an escalation in respectively 16, 17, and 11% of the patients. Moreover, 11% of the samples were classified as contaminants or not clinically relevant and would have led to early de-escalation or withdrawal of any antibiotic. Detection of resistance genes in addition to identification alone increased escalation rate from 4 to 11% of the patients. Absence of the ePlex result was considered a lost opportunity for therapy modification in 28% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Bryant
- Laboratoire de bactériologie-hygiène hospitalière, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Iyad Almahmoud
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Isabelle Pierre
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Julie Bardet
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Saber Touati
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Daniele Maubon
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Muriel Cornet
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Claire Richarme
- Laboratoire de bactériologie-hygiène hospitalière, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Max Maurin
- Laboratoire de bactériologie-hygiène hospitalière, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Patricia Pavese
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Yvan Caspar
- Laboratoire de bactériologie-hygiène hospitalière, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Briggs N, Campbell S, Gupta S. Advances in rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 99:115219. [PMID: 33059201 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Septicemia from bloodstream infections (BSI) is the second largest cause of inpatient mortality and the single most expensive condition for US hospitals to manage. There has been an explosive development of commercial diagnostic systems to accelerate the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of causative pathogens. Despite adoption of advanced technologies like matrix-assisted laser desorption imaging-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification, clinical impact has been variable, in part due to the persistent need for conventional AST as well as prescriber understanding of these rapidly evolving platforms. Newer technologies are expanding on rapid detection of genotypic determinants of resistance, but only recently has rapid phenotypic AST been available. Yet, improved outcomes with rapid diagnostic platforms are still most evident in conjunction with active antimicrobial stewardship. This review will outline key advancements in rapid diagnostics for BSI and the role of antimicrobial stewardship in this new era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neima Briggs
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Sheldon Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Shaili Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, VA Healthcare Systems of CT, West Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Krifors A, Rådberg G, Golbob S, Omar Z, Svensson C, Heimer D, Carlander C. The clinical impact of implementing GenMark ePlex blood culture panels for around-the-clock blood culture identification; a prospective observational study. Infect Dis (Lond) 2020; 52:705-712. [PMID: 32522111 DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1775882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Implementing rapid molecular blood culture diagnostics in the clinical management of sepsis is essential for early pathogen identification and resistance gene testing. The GenMark ePlex blood culture panels offer a broad microbial spectrum with minimal hands-on time and approximately 1.5 h to result. Therefore, ePlex can be utilized at times when the clinical microbiology laboratory is unavailable.Methods: From 23 October 2019 to 30 December 2019, consecutive non-duplicate positive blood cultures signalling microbial growth at the 24 h/7 days-a-week available clinical chemistry laboratory between 9 pm and 7 am were analysed with ePlex. All blood cultures were transported to the microbiology laboratory the following day for conventional identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing.Results: We used ePlex to test 91 blood cultures, of which 86 had confirmed microbial growth. Eighty-one were positive for ePlex target pathogens. The ePlex results were in complete agreement with conventional methods in 72/81 (88.9%) of cases and available within a median of 10.9 h earlier. Resistance gene targets (11 mecA and 1 CTX-M) were concordant with phenotypic susceptibility in all cases. In 18/86 (20.9%) of the patient cases, there was an opportunity to optimize antimicrobial therapy based on the ePlex result. The ePlex result affected clinical decision-making in 4/86 (4.7%) of the cases and reduced the average time to effective antimicrobial therapy by 8.9 h.Conclusions: Our implementation of ePlex is a feasible option to attain around-the-clock blood culture identification in many hospitals. It can significantly reduce time-to-pathogen identification and have an impact on clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Krifors
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, Västmanland County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Rådberg
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Sultan Golbob
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Zhino Omar
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Camilla Svensson
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Daniel Heimer
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Christina Carlander
- Centre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, Västmanland County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.,Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|