Prediction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus involvement in disease sites by concomitant nasal sampling

The Microbiome and Pulmonary Immune Function

In the last decade, the lung microbiome field has matured into a promising area of translational and clinical research due to emerging evidence indicating a role for respiratory microbiota in lung immunity and pathogenesis. Here, we review recent insights pertaining to the lung microbiome's relationship with pulmonary immune function. We discuss areas of future investigation that will be essential to the development of immunomodulatory therapies targeting the respiratory microbiome.

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal PCR Testing Protocol

Background/Objectives: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can cause cases of community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and nasal colonization with this pathogen increases the risk of infection. Due to its high negative predictive value, multiple studies support using the MRSA nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to discontinue antimicrobials that target MRSA in the setting of a negative test result. The purpose of this project was to assess the utility of a protocol to allow pharmacists the ability to order MRSA nasal PCR screenings in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. Results: The pre-protocol group included a random sample of 100 patients, and the post-protocol group included 625 patients. Vancomycin DOTs when pharmacists ordered PCRs were significantly lower compared to the pre-protocol group (p < 0.5; 95% CI, 0.46-2.24). The average length of stay and readmission rates at 30 days were significantly lower in the post-protocol group compared to the pre-protocol group (p < 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively), but there was no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.33). Methods: A protocol was implemented at our institution that allowed pharmacists to order an MRSA nasal PCR test in patients with pneumonia. This retrospective chart review compared a cohort of patients who received vancomycin from before implementation of the protocol to patients who received vancomycin after the protocol's implementation. The primary endpoint was vancomycin days of therapy (DOTs) between the pre-protocol group and the post-protocol group. Other endpoints assessed included the length of hospitalization, readmission rates, and mortality. Conclusions: Pharmacists ordering MRSA nasal PCR tests significantly reduced vancomycin DOTs, average length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates, contributing to positive outcomes in patients with pneumonia.

Assessing the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Utility of Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus PCR Testing in Pediatric Orbital Cellulitis

Data are limited on the clinical impact of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction testing for orbital cellulitis. This 2-center, retrospective study demonstrated a negative predictive value of 98.0% and an overall lower use of anti-MRSA antibiotics, without a concomitant increase in hospital readmission.

Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing for Pathogen Detection and Quantification in Children With Musculoskeletal Infections

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of all pediatric musculoskeletal infections (MSKIs) are culture negative. Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing is noninvasive and not prone to the barriers of culture. We evaluated the performance of plasma mcfDNA sequencing in identifying a pathogen, and examined the duration of pathogen detection in children with MSKIs.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of children, aged 6 months to 18 years, hospitalized from July 2019 to May 2022 with MSKIs, in whom we obtained serial plasma mcfDNA sequencing samples and compared the results with cultures.

RESULTS

A pathogen was recovered by culture in 23 of 34 (68%) participants, and by initial mcfDNA sequencing in 25 of 31 (81%) participants. Multiple pathogens were detected in the majority (56%) of positive initial samples. Complete concordance with culture (all organisms accounted for by both methods) was 32%, partial concordance (at least one of the same organism(s) identified by both methods) was 36%, and discordance was 32%. mcfDNA sequencing was more likely to show concordance (complete or partial) if obtained prior to a surgical procedure (82%), compared with after (20%), (RR 4.12 [95% CI 1.25, 22.93], p = .02). There was no difference in concordance based on timing of antibiotics (presample antibiotics 60% vs no antibiotics 75%, RR 0.8 [95% CI 0.40, 1.46], p = .65]). mcfDNA sequencing was positive in 67% of culture-negative infections and detected a pathogen for a longer interval than blood culture (median 2 days [IQR 1, 6 days] vs 1 day [1, 1 day], p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma mcfDNA sequencing may be useful in culture-negative pediatric MSKIs if the sample is obtained prior to surgery. However, results must be interpreted in the appropriate clinical context as multiple pathogens are frequently detected supporting the need for diagnostic stewardship.

Timing of Acquisition of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage: Can we Limit Repeat Screening?

INTRODUCTION

Broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics are routinely administered to hospitalized patients with potential infections. These antibiotics provide protection; however, they come with their own negative effects. The utility of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal screening to steward anti-MRSA empiric antibiotics in hospitalized patients is established. With this current study, we look to determine the optimal frequency of MRSA nasal testing to help limit unnecessary testing consistent with the efforts of Choosing Wisely. We hypothesize that MRSA PCR nasal swab conversion will be low within the first 2 wk after index swab collection.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective chart review of all adult patient encounters from October 2019-July 2021 with MRSA PCR nasal testing. We excluded duplicate patient encounters. Further exclusion criteria included patients with a single MRSA PCR swab and those who tested positive for MRSA colonization on their index swab. We evaluated how many conversions from negative to positive there were, and the timing of those relative to those that did not develop colonization while in the hospital.

RESULTS

263 patients had multiple MRSA nares screening. 215 patients had 2 swab collections, 35 patients had 3 swab collections, 9 patients had 4 swab collections, and 4 patients had 5 swab collections. 14 converted from negative to positive. The time of conversions ranged from within 0-36 d, with an overall cumulative conversion of 5%. The rate of cumulative conversion from one week was 1.9%, for 2 wk it was 3.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that MRSA PCR nasal swab conversion is unlikely to occur within 2 wk. Therefore, to optimize resources, further investigation should be conducted to target guidelines as well as systems to limit repeat swab testing. We will investigate the utility of this after implementation.

Pediatric Utilization of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swabs for Antimicrobial Stewardship

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can cause serious infections and empiric treatment regimens in children frequently include an anti-MRSA antibiotic. Studies in adults have demonstrated a high negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nasal swabs (MNS) in a variety of infectious syndromes. Negative MNS have been utilized as a tool to guide de-escalation of anti-MRSA antibiotics in adults, especially in those with lower respiratory tract infections, but data in children is minimal. The primary objective of this study was to determine the NPV and positive predictive value (PPV) of MNS in children hospitalized for treatment of an infection.

METHODS

This was a single-site, retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients admitted with a suspected infectious diagnosis who had an MNS performed during their hospitalization between June 1, 2018 and November 25, 2022.

RESULTS

This study identified 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Eleven (6.4%) nasal swabs were positive for MRSA and 10 (5.8%) microbiological cultures from suspected sources of infection were identified to be positive for MRSA. The MNS was found to have a sensitivity of 20%, specificity of 94%, PPV of 18% and NPV of 95% for all sites of infection.

CONCLUSION

MNS has a high NPV and low PPV in children. MNS can be utilized as an antimicrobial stewardship tool to guide the safe de-escalation of anti-MRSA antibiotics in children.

Use of nares swab to de-escalate vancomycin for patients with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction

According to the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 30%-50% of antibiotic use in hospitals is unnecessary or inappropriate. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic further complicates antibiotic use leading to greater initiation of empiric antibiotics. The result is antibiotic overuse and increased duration of unnecessary therapy. Vancomycin is a drug of last resort, primarily relegated to the treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). De-escalating vancomycin can mean waiting on MRSA culture results, which may take up to 96 h. Nares screening for MRSA is shown to possess high negative predictive value for ruling out suspected MRSA pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections, and bacteremia.

Methods

This before-and-after study examines the impact of vancomycin therapy de-escalation due to absence of MRSA colonization detected via PCR assay of nares swabs. An intervention with providers using SMART goals was designed to increase nasal swabbing for MRSA and ultimately decrease vancomycin use at a large, tertiary-care urban hospital.

Results

There was a significant increase in use of vancomycin nares swabs (28/150 vs 48/100, p = 0.040) in the immediate pre/postintervention period, and significant decreases in vancomycin usage days/1,000 patient days of 2.34% per month (p = 0.039) over a two year period after the intervention.

Conclusion

An intervention using PCR nares swabs to detect MRSA led to significant, lasting decreases in vancomycin usage at this hospital. Similar interventions should be planned at hospitals experiencing overuse of this antibiotic.

Comparison of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening Predictive Value in the Intensive Care Unit and General Ward

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening appears promising for antimicrobial stewardship programs. However, a paucity of data remains on the diagnostic performance of culture-based MRSA screen in the intensive care unit (ICU) for pneumonia and bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the predictive value of culture-based MRSA nasal screening for pneumonia and bacteremia in ICU and general ward patients.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted over a 23-month period. Adult patients with MRSA nasal screening ≤48 hours of collecting a respiratory and/or blood culture with concurrent initiation of anti-MRSA therapy were included. The primary endpoint was to compare the negative predictive value (NPV) associated with culture-based MRSA nasal screening between ICU and general ward patients with suspected pneumonia.

RESULTS

A total of 5106 patients representing the ICU (n = 2515) and general ward (n = 2591) were evaluated. The NPV of the MRSA nares for suspected pneumonia was not significantly different between ICU and general ward patient populations (98.3% and 97.6%, respectively; P = 0.41). The MRSA nares screening tool also had a high NPV for suspected bacteremia in ICU (99.8%) and general ward groups (99.7%) (P = 0.56). The overall positive MRSA nares rates in the ICU and general ward patient populations were 9.1% and 8.2%, respectively (P = 0.283). Moreover, MRSA-positive respiratory and blood cultures among ICU patients were 5.8% and 0.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Our findings support the routine use of MRSA nasal screening using the culture-based method in ICU patients with pneumonia. Further research on the clinical performance for MRSA bacteremia in the ICU is warranted.

Evaluation of Anti-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Prescribing Habits in Patients with a Positive MRSA Nasal Swab in the Absence of Positive Cultures

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swabs are guideline-recommended de-escalation tools in certain patients with pneumonia. Prior studies have demonstrated reduced anti-MRSA therapy with negative results, but the impact on durations of therapy has been poorly elucidated in patients with positive PCRs. The objective of this review was to evaluate anti-MRSA treatment durations in patients with a positive MRSA PCR in the absence of MRSA growth on culture. This was a single-center, retrospective observational study evaluating 52 hospitalized, adult patients receiving anti-MRSA therapy with positive MRSA PCRs. The overall median duration of anti-MRSA therapy was five days, including a median of four days after PCR results. This was consistent among intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patient populations and in patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Among patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), the median duration of anti-MRSA therapy was seven days, with a median of six days after PCR results. Overall, patients received a median duration of anti-MRSA therapy that would constitute a full treatment course for many respiratory infections, which indicates that providers may equate a positive MRSA nasal PCR with positive culture growth and highlights the need for education on the interpretation of positive tests.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swab Is Insufficient to Withhold Empiric Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia Coverage in a Trauma Population

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization is a predictor of MRSA pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Negative nasal swabs have shown up to a 97% negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia in nontrauma populations, though little investigation has been pursued in trauma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All trauma patients admitted to the ICU from April 2018 to February 2019 were screened for MRSA colonization by nasal swab. Patients with suspicion for pneumonia underwent bronchoalveolar lavage or quantitative sputum culture and were started on empiric antibiotic therapy based on the swab result. Swab-positive patients were started on empiric MRSA coverage and swab-negative patients were not.

RESULTS

MRSA nasal swab screening was performed in 601 trauma ICU patients. Ninety-six patients subsequently underwent pneumonia workup and were started on an empiric antibiotic regimen based on nasal swab results. Seventeen (17.7%) patients were MRSA nasal swab positive on screening, and 22 (22.9%) patients subsequently had significant growth of MRSA on quantitative respiratory culture. The sensitivity of nasal swab was 50.0% and the specificity was 91.9%. Eleven patients had a negative MRSA nasal swab but a positive MRSA pneumonia (11.5%). Patients with inadequate antibiotic coverage had statistically longer hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ventilator days, and rates of unplanned intubation compared to patients with adequate antibiotic coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal swab screening was not sensitive enough in a trauma population with a high endemic incidence of MRSA colonization to warrant withholding empiric antibiotic MRSA coverage in patients with suspected pneumonia.

Evaluating Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Nasal Screening as a Tool for Antimicrobial Stewardship

INTRODUCTION

Initiation of broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics is common when infection is suspected in hospitalized adults. The benefits of early utilization of effective antibiotics are well documented. However, the negative effects of inappropriate antibiotic use have led to antimicrobial stewardship mandates. Recent data demonstrate the utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal screening to steward anti-MRSA empiric antibiotics in pneumonia. We hypothesize that MRSA PCR nasal swabs would also be effective to rule out other MRSA infection to effectively limit unnecessary antibiotics for any infectious source.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective chart review of all adult patient encounters from October 2019-July 2021 with MRSA PCR nasal testing. We then reviewed all charts to evaluate for the presence of infections based on source cultures results, as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated from 2 × 2 contingency tables.

RESULTS

Among all patients with MRSA nasal screening, 1189 patients had any infection. Prevalence of MRSA nasal carriage among patients screened was 12%. Prevalence of MRSA infection among all infections was 7.5%. MRSA nasal swabs demonstrated a negative predictive value of 100% for MRSA urinary tract infection, 97.9% for MRSA bacteremia, 97.8% for MRSA pneumonia, 92.1% for MRSA wound infection, and 96.6% for other MRSA infections. Overall, MRSA PCR nasal swabs had a sensitivity of 68.5%, specificity of 90.1%, positive predictive value of 23.7%, and negative predictive value of 98.5% for any infections.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA PCR nasal swabs have a high negative predictive value for all infections. Our data support the use of MRSA PCR nasal swabs to rule out MRSA infection and thereby allow early de-escalation of MRSA coverage in hospitalized patients requiring empiric antibiotics. Implementation of MRSA screening could decrease antibiotic-associated morbidity, resistance, and costs. More studies should be conducted to validate these results and support these findings.

Effectiveness of an electronic health system-based best-practice advisory to enhance the time to de-escalation of vancomycin for respiratory indications

OBJECTIVE

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is highly unlikely when nasal-swab results are negative. We evaluated the impact of an electronic prompt regarding MRSA nasal screening on the length of vancomycin therapy for respiratory indications.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical center (Mayo Clinic) in Jacksonville, Florida.

PATIENTS

Eligible patients received empiric treatment with vancomycin for suspected or confirmed respiratory infections from January through April 2019 (preimplementation cohort) and from October 2019 through January 2020 (postimplementation cohort).

INTERVENTION

The electronic health system software was modified to provide a best-practice advisory (BPA) prompt to the pharmacist upon order verification of vancomycin for patients with suspected or confirmed respiratory indications. Pharmacists were prompted to order a MRSA nasal swab if it was not already ordered by the provider.

METHODS

We reviewed patient records to determine the time from vancomycin prescription to de-escalation. The secondary end point was incidence of acute kidney injury.

RESULTS

The study included 120 patients (preimplementation, n = 61; postimplementation, n = 59). Median time to de-escalation was significantly shorter for the postimplementation cohort: 76 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 52-109) versus 42 hours (IQR, 37-61; P = .002). Acute kidney injury occurred in 11 patients (18%) in the preimplementation cohort and in 3 patients (5%) in the postimplementation cohort (P = .01; number needed to treat, 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a BPA notification for MRSA nasal screening helped decrease the time to de-escalation of vancomycin.

Nasal screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus does not reduce surgical site infection after primary lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) testing and decolonization has demonstrated success for arthroplasty patients in surgical site infections (SSIs) prevention. Spine surgery, however, has seen varied results.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of nasal MRSA testing and operative debridement rates on surgical site infection after primary lumbar fusion.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study and/or Consolidated medical enterprise PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing primary instrumented lumbar fusions from January 2015 to December 2019 were reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was incision and drainage performed in the operating room within 90 days of surgery.

METHODS

MRSA testing <90-day's before surgery, mupirocin prescription <30-day's before surgery, perioperative antibiotics, and Elixhauser comorbidity index were collected for each subject. Bivariate analysis used Wilcoxon rank-sum testing and logistic regression modeling Multivariable logistic regression modeling assessed for associations with MRSA testing, intravenous vancomycin use, and I&D rate.

RESULTS

The study included 1,884 patients for analysis, with mean age of 63.1 (SE 0.3) and BMI 29.5 (SE 0.1). MRSA testing was performed in 755 patients (40.1%) and was more likely to be performed in patients with lower Elixhauser index scores (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p=.021) on multivariable analysis. Vancomycin use increased significantly over time (OR 1.49 and/or year, 95% CI 1.3-1.8, p<.001) despite no change in mupirocin or I&D rates. MRSA testing, mupirocin prescriptions, perioperative parenteral vancomycin use, and intrawound vancomycin powder use had no impact on I&D rates. I&D risk was associated with higher BMI (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, p=.009) and higher number of blood product units transfused (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.46, p=.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates no impact on surgical I&D rates from the use of preoperative MRSA testing. Increased BMI and transfusions were associated with operative I&D rates for surgical site infection. As a result of the hospital directive, vancomycin use increased over time with no associated change in infection rates, underscoring the need for focused interventions, and engagement with antibiotic stewardship programs.

Predictive Value of the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Swab for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Trauma Patient

Background: Many trauma centers have empiric treatment algorithms for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) treatment prior to culture results that include antibiotic agents for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage that can have adverse effects. This is the only study to evaluate risk factors and MRSA nasal swabs to risk-stratify trauma patients for MRSA VAP, thereby potentially limiting the need for empiric vancomycin. Patients and Methods: This was a single institution retrospective cohort study. Adult patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2013 and December 2017 who had a MRSA nasal swab and subsequently met criteria for VAP were included. Demographics, risk factors for MRSA pneumonia, and culture results were collected. Results: A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria. The negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nasal swab at predicting subsequent MRSA pneumonia was 97%. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 50.0%, 96.2%, and 44.4%, respectively. Smokers were more likely to develop MRSA pneumonia, odds ratio: 7.0 (p = 0.02). When considering non-smokers with a negative MRSA nasal swab, NPV was 100%. Conclusions: This is the only study to date that assesses the utility of MRSA nasal swab and risk factor data to guide empiric VAP antibiotic therapy in trauma patients. Smoking was found to be a risk factor for MRSA pneumonia. The use of MRSA nasal swabs in combination with smoking status to guide empiric use of MRSA coverage antibiotic agents is recommended because of a 100% NPV. When utilized, as many as 68% of patients may safely be spared MRSA coverage antibiotic agents and the related adverse effects.

Utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

BACKGROUND

Current literature has demonstrated the utility of the MRSA nasal screen as a de-escalation tool to decrease unnecessary anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy. However, data on the applicability of this test in patients with hematologic malignancy is lacking.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with or without a history of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), with pneumonia and MRSA nasal screening with respiratory cultures obtained. The primary outcome was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MRSA nasal screen for MRSA pneumonia. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of the MRSA nasal screen and prevalence of MRSA pneumonia.

RESULTS

Of 98 patients with AML and pneumonia, the prevalence of MRSA pneumonia was 4.1% with confirmed positive MRSA respiratory cultures observed in 4 patient cases. In patients with confirmed MRSA pneumonia, 3 had positive MRSA nasal screens while 1 had a false negative result, possibly due to a long lag time (21 days) between MRSA nasal screen and pneumonia diagnosis. Overall, the MRSA nasal screen demonstrated 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 98.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the low prevalence, empiric use of anti-MRSA therapy in those AML and HCT patients with pneumonia may not be warranted in clinically stable patients. For patients in whom empiric anti-MRSA antibiotics are initiated, nasal screening for MRSA may be utilized to de-escalate anti-MRSA antibiotics in patients with AML with or without HCT.

Distribution of sasX, qacA/B and mupA genes and determination of genetic relatedness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among clinical isolates and nasal swab samples from the same patients in a hospital in Malaysia

INTRODUCTION

This study determined the distribution of sasX, qacA/B and mupA genes from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from clinical samples and nasal swab samples of the same patients and analysed their genetic relatedness.

METHODS

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect the presence of sasX, qacA/B and mupA genes from 47 paired MRSA isolates. A paired isolate was defined as one nasal swab (colonising) isolate and clinical isolate that caused infection in the same patient. 22 selected paired isolates were subjected to multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The genetic relatedness among the isolates and association between the putative genes with epidemic sequence types (STs) were investigated.

RESULTS

7 (14.9%, n = 14) paired isolates were positive for the sasX gene. qacA/B genes were positive in 7.4% (n = 7) of the isolates, from three paired isolates and one clinical isolate whose paired colonising isolate was negative. The paired sample of three patients were positive for both genes. The mupA gene was not detected in all the isolates. MLST revealed two epidemic STs, ST22 and ST239, and a novel ST4649. sasX and qacA/B genes were found in ST239 in 29.5% (n = 13) and 13.6% (n = 6) of cases, respectively. Gene co-existence occurred in 13.6% (n = 6) of MRSA ST239 and 2.3% (n = 1) of MRSA ST4649.

CONCLUSION

sasX and qacA/B genes were present in the MRSA isolates, while the mupA gene was undetected. ST22 and ST239 were the major MRSA clones. The circulating MRSA genotypes conferred different virulence and resistance determinants in our healthcare settings.

Correlation Between Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nares Colonization and MRSA Diabetic Foot Infections

Infectious Diseases Society of America diabetic foot infection (DFI) guidelines indicate empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage for patients with a history of MRSA infection, when local prevalence of MRSA is high, or infection is clinically severe. These recommendations may lead to overutilization of empiric MRSA coverage, which can result in serious consequences. A strong negative predictive value (NPV) has been reported in literature for pneumonia, and recently, for all anatomical sites of infection. While these findings are promising, further validation is needed before clinicians may confidently use MRSA nares to guide empiric therapy for DFIs. A retrospective electronic medical record review was completed between October 1, 2013 and October 1, 2019. Patients met inclusion criteria if they were at least 18, admitted with a DFI, had MRSA nares test results, and DFI cultures. Patients were excluded if pregnant or MRSA infection within 1 year prior to index admission for DFI. A total of 200 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of study participants were male with a mean age of 63. NPV of MRSA nares for MRSA DFIs was determined to be 94% and positive predictive value 58%. Sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 94%, respectively. Results of this study are consistent with prior literature supporting strong correlation of NPV for MRSA nares. The DFIs evaluated suggest a strong NPV of MRSA nares for MRSA DFIs, which may allow for faster de-escalation of empiric anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy and lower risk of adverse events associated with anti-MRSA therapy.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening upon inpatient hospital admission: Is there concordance between nasal swab results and samples taken from skin and soft tissue?

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are associated with increased mortality and healthcare costs. In 2007, a Veterans' Affairs (VA) hospital implemented a MRSA nasal screening program, following a nationwide VA mandate, in an effort to reduce healthcare-associated MRSA infections.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation between the nasal screening results for MRSA and culture results of wound and tissue sites.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on inpatients at our VA hospital. Patients were included if they had undergone nasal screening for MRSA plus culture of a wound or tissue site within 30 days of hospital admission.

RESULTS

In total, 337 patients underwent nasal screening and wound culture and 211 underwent nasal screening and wound and tissue cultures. The prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization was 14.2% for wound samples and 15.2% for tissue samples. The sensitivities of MRSA nasal screening for detecting MRSA were 64.6% for wound cultures and 65.5% for tissue cultures. Specificities were 86.2% and 88.8% for wound and tissue cultures, respectively. The positive predictive values (PPVs) were 43.7% and 51.2% for wound and tissue cultures, respectively, and the negative predictive values (NPVs) were high at 93.6% and 93.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of wound or tissue samples for which culture results are pending, a negative MRSA nasal swab may be a component of the decision to withhold or discontinue MRSA-active agents.

Impact of a Pharmacist-driven Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Nasal Swab Protocol on the De-escalation of Empiric Vancomycin in Patients with Pneumonia in a Rural Healthcare Setting

Introduction

Pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carries a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Many clinicians empirically treat those at risk of developing MRSA pneumonia with vancomycin. Several studies have identified a high negative predictive value of the MRSA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swab test in lower respiratory tract infections, suggesting it can be used to guide the de-escalation of empiric anti-MRSA therapy.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven MRSA PCR nasal swab protocol on the de-escalation of empiric vancomycin in patients with pneumonia in a rural healthcare setting. Secondarily, to assess the rate of hospital length of stay, the rate of vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury, and in-hospital mortality after pharmacist-driven de-escalation of empiric vancomycin in patients with pneumonia. 

Methods

A retrospective, single-center, pre-post cohort study was conducted in patients after the implementation of a pharmacist-driven protocol allowing pharmacists to obtain nasal swabs and PCR testing for MRSA in those on empiric vancomycin therapy for suspected MRSA pneumonia. Based on negative test results, pharmacists recommended a de-escalation of empiric vancomycin to the physician. Patients were included if they were adults at least 18 years of age, had a physician diagnosis of suspected or confirmed pneumonia, and initiated on at least one dose of intravenous vancomycin within 48 hours of admission.

Results

A total of 79 patients were identified for inclusion in the pre-protocol group (n=32) or post-protocol group (n= 47). The mean duration of vancomycin therapy in the pre-protocol group was 3.1 days as compared to 1.7 days in the post-protocol group for a 1.4 days reduction (p=0.044). There was no significant impact on the number of vancomycin cases de-escalated within 24 hours (p=0.14) but there was a significant reduction at 48 hours (p=0.01). Protocol implementation was associated with a reduction in the average length of hospitalization (8 versus 5.20 days, p=0.006). Neither group had a vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury or in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Among patients with suspected MRSA pneumonia, a pharmacist-driven MRSA PCR nasal swab protocol resulted in a significant reduction of empiric vancomycin duration of therapy without an adverse impact on clinical outcomes in a rural healthcare setting.

The Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening to Rule Out MRSA Pneumonia: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis With Antimicrobial Stewardship Implications

Background

Recent literature has highlighted methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening as a possible antimicrobial stewardship program tool for avoiding unnecessary empiric MRSA therapy for pneumonia, yet current guidelines recommend MRSA therapy based on risk factors. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of MRSA nasal screening in MRSA pneumonia.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to November 2016 for English studies evaluating MRSA nasal screening and development of MRSA pneumonia. Data analysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

Twenty-two studies, comprising 5163 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRSA nares screen for all MRSA pneumonia types were 70.9% and 90.3%, respectively. With a 10% prevalence of potential MRSA pneumonia, the calculated PPV was 44.8%, and the NPV was 96.5%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for MRSA community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) were 85% and 92.1%, respectively. For CAP and HCAP both the PPV and NPV increased, to 56.8% and 98.1%, respectively. In comparison, for MRSA ventilated-associated pneumonia, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 40.3%, 93.7%, 35.7%, and 94.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

Nares screening for MRSA had a high specificity and NPV for ruling out MRSA pneumonia, particularly in cases of CAP/HCAP. Based on the NPV, MRSA nares screening is a valuable tool for AMS to streamline empiric antibiotic therapy, especially among patients with pneumonia who are not colonized with MRSA.

Predictive characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nares screening tests for methicillin resistance among S. aureus clinical isolates from hospitalized veterans

For patients with possible Staphylococcus aureus infection, providers must decide whether to treat empirically for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Nares MRSA colonization screening tests could inform decisions regarding empiric MRSA-active antibiotic use.1,2.

Systematic Review of the Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening for MRSA Pneumonia

Objective: To describe the diagnostic performance characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening for patients with pneumonia. Data Sources: PubMed and Scopus were searched from 1 January 1990 to 12 December 2018 using terms methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus AND (screening OR active surveillance OR surveillance culture OR targeted surveillance OR chromogenic OR PCR OR polymerase chain reaction OR rapid test) AND (nares OR nasal) AND (pneumonia OR respiratory). Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant studies in humans and English were considered. Data Synthesis: In all, 19 studies, including 21 790 patients, were included. Nasal screening for MRSA had a high negative predictive value (NPV; 76% to 99.4% for relevant studies) across all types of pneumonia. Time from nasal screening to culture varied across studies. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: MRSA nasal screening has a high NPV for MRSA involvement in pneumonia. Utilizing this test for antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) purposes can provide a valuable tool for reducing unwarranted anti-MRSA agents and may provide additional cost benefits. A cutoff of 7 days between nasal swab and culture or infection onset seems most appropriate for use of this test for anti-MRSA agent de-escalation for ASP purposes. Conclusions: Consideration for the inclusion of the utility of MRSA nasal screening in MRSA pneumonia should be made for future pneumonia and ASP guidelines. Additional studies are warranted to fully evaluate specific pneumonia classifications, culture types, culture timing, and clinical outcomes associated with the use of this test in patients with pneumonia.

Do lower respiratory tract samples contribute to the assessment of carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation after major heart surgery?

Colonization by Staphylococcus aureus is regularly assessed in patients undergoing major heart surgery (MHS). Despite pre-surgical decontamination attempts, a significant proportion of MHS patients remain colonized by S. aureus at the time of surgery. Nasal sampling can be improved by sampling extra-nasal areas. We evaluated whether processing lower respiratory tract (LRT) secretions enhanced the detection of S. aureus after MHS. Following a standard protocol, nasal swabs and LRT aspirates were obtained from all of the study patients at the time of surgery or in the immediate postoperative period. One swab was used for culture in the microbiology laboratory, and a second swab was used for the Xpert SA Nasal Complete assay. According to our definition of colonization (culture positive and/or PCR positive), 31 of 115 patients (26.9%) were colonized at the time of surgery. Among these, LRT samples only were positive in three patients (2.6% of the whole population and 9.7% of the carriers). The remaining 28 were either positive in the nasal sample or positive in both samples. The yield of the detection of colonization by S. aureus by including also LRT samples in patients undergoing MHS is limited and must be balanced with laboratory workload and demands on laboratory personnel. Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov NCT02640001.

Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening for Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Review of Current Literature

Significant clinical and financial consequences are associated with both inadequate and unnecessary exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. As such, antimicrobial stewardship programs seek objective, reliable, and cost-effective tests to identify patients at highest or lowest risk for drug-resistant organisms to guide empirical antimicrobial selection. Use of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening to rule out MRSA in lower respiratory tract infections has led to significant reductions in duration of vancomycin therapy. The clinical utility of MRSA nasal screening in other types of infection remains less clear. This review describes the performance of MRSA nasal screening in predicting MRSA infection, highlights practical considerations for use of MRSA nasal screening, and provides guidance for incorporating MRSA nasal screening into clinical practice. With a high negative predictive value when the prevalence of MRSA is low, MRSA nasal screening is a valuable antimicrobial stewardship tool with potential applications beyond lower respiratory tract infections. In appropriately selected patients, negative MRSA nasal screening can prevent initiation or guide discontinuation of anti-MRSA therapy. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should develop institutional guidelines to promote proper use of MRSA nasal screening. Pharmacists are well positioned to assist with education, interpretation, and application of MRSA nasal screening results.

MRSA colonization status as a predictor of clinical infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is often used as empiric therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), but can be associated with clinically important adverse events including renal failure. MRSA colonization swabs are primarily used for infection control; their use as a diagnostic test to inform the decision to add empiric vancomycin therapy has not been well elucidated.

METHODS

We performed a Medline and Embase systematic review for peer-reviewed studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of using MRSA colonization status to predict MRSA infections. Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Grey literature was excluded.

FINDINGS

29 studies were included involving 24225 patients. In cases where the pathogen is not known to be S. aureus, specificities were greater than 85% for bacteremia, lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), and all infections pooled together. Sensitivities ranged between 54.0% and 77.5%. In cases where the pathogen is known to be S. aureus, we found studies on bacteremia and SSTI and arrived at pooled estimates of sensitivities ranging between 56.6% and 56.9%, and of specificities greater than 91%. Most importantly, for most infections in settings where the prevalence of MRSA as a causative organism is below 15%, the negative predictive value of a negative MRSA colonization swab exceeds 90%.

INTERPRETATIONS

In settings of low-moderate MRSA prevalence, negative MRSA screening swabs may prevent unnecessary vancomycin use. More research is needed to assess if this strategy can mitigate the cost of screening in areas with a low MRSA colonization rate.

Top 10 Myths Regarding the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cellulitis

BACKGROUND

Cellulitis is commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). Patients who present with cellulitis incur significant health care costs and may be overtreated with antibiotics. The accurate diagnosis and treatment of cellulitis plays an important role in cost-effective, high-quality medical care, as well as appropriate antibiotic utilization.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to describe common fallacies regarding cellulitis. We present 10 myths that result in misdiagnosis, overtreatment, or inappropriate empiric management of cellulitis. Clinical presentation, including swelling and redness, is explored in depth, along with incidence of community-acquired methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus, management of tick bites, and effective antibiotic therapy for cellulitis.

DISCUSSION

Patients are often treated for cellulitis unnecessarily or inappropriately. Awareness of these myths will help guide providers in clinical decision making in order to effectively tailor treatment for these infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Cellulitis is not as simple as it might seem, and is commonly misdiagnosed in the ED. Noninfectious causes of local symptoms, including lymphedema, venous stasis, and deep vein thrombosis need to be considered. Cellulitis should be treated with empiric antimicrobial therapy based on patient risk factors and regional susceptibility patterns. This review will assist providers in managing cellulitis and avoiding treatment errors that lead to high costs, unwanted side effects for patients, and overuse of antibiotics.

Nasal-Swab Results for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Associated Infections

BACKGROUND

Nasal-swab screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has a quicker turnaround time than other bacterial culture methods, with results available within 24 h. Although MRSA nasal-swab screening is not intended to guide antimicrobial therapy, this method may give clinicians additional information for earlier tailoring of empiric antimicrobial agents.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the diagnostic characteristics of nasal-swab screening in predicting MRSA infections in hospitalized patients receiving empiric treatment with IV vancomycin.

METHODS

A retrospective observational chart review was conducted for newly admitted adult patients of the Peter Lougheed Centre in Calgary, Alberta, who were treated empirically with IV vancomycin from January to October 2015 and who underwent nasal-swab screening for MRSA. The diagnostic characteristics of nasal-swab screening were calculated in relation to corresponding culture results for samples collected on admission.

RESULTS

For the 273 patients included in this study, nasal-swab screening for MRSA showed the following diagnostic characteristics in relation to bacterial culture results: sensitivity 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.6%-83.5%), specificity 93.9% (95% CI 90.0%-96.3%), positive predictive value 30.4% (95% CI 14.1%-53.0%), negative predictive value 98.0% (95% CI 95.1%-99.3%), positive likelihood ratio 9.5 (95% CI 4.9-18.7), and negative likelihood ratio 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high specificity of this rapid method, clinicians should ensure that patients who are receiving empiric treatment for MRSA infection and who have a positive result on nasal-swab screening continue to receive MRSA coverage until culture results are available. In addition, the high negative predictive value and positive likelihood ratio for nasal-swab screening in a low-prevalence setting suggest that a negative result significantly reduces the probability of MRSA infection. Although nasal-swab screening for MRSA is currently used for determining isolation precautions, this method also had utility in helping clinicians to predict the probability of MRSA infection and in guiding decisions about antimicrobial therapy.

Efficacy of periodic surveillance culture in a neonatal intensive care unit in the presumption of causative pathogens of late-onset bacterial infection

BACKGROUND

Surveillance cultures have been recommended for infection control of resistant bacteria in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). However, the utility of surveillance cultures in the presumption of causative bacteria in late-onset bacterial infection has been controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the causative pathogens of late-onset bacterial infection and the results of periodic surveillance cultures in a NICU.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 600 patients hospitalized in the NICU of a large metropolitan hospital from 2010-2013. The correspondence of the results of surveillance cultures with causative pathogens was analyzed in patients who developed late-onset bacterial infection.

RESULTS

Staphylococcus species and enterobacterium were the most prevalent in the samples obtained from the oropharynx and rectum, respectively, during the investigation period. Twenty patients (3.3%) developed late-onset bacterial infection. The causative pathogens in 15 patients (75%) were also detected from the final surveillance cultures; these patients tended to be older than the other 5 patients (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance cultures might be useful for the presumption of causative pathogens of late-onset bacterial infection in patients with risk factors for the development of nosocomial bacterial infection.

Risk of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections among Children Found to be Staphylococcus aureus MRSA USA300 Carriers

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to examine community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) carriage and infections and determine risk factors associated specifically with MRSA USA300.

Methods

We conducted a case control study in a pediatric emergency department. Nasal and axillary swabs were collected, and participants were interviewed for risk factors. The primary outcome was the proportion of S. aureus carriers among those presenting with and without a skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). We further categorized S. aureus carriers into MRSA USA300 carriers or non-MRSA USA300 carriers.

Results

We found the MRSA USA300 carriage rate was higher in children less than two years of age, those with an SSTI, children with recent antibiotic use, and those with a family history of SSTI. MRSA USA300 carriers were also more likely to have lower income compared to non-MRSA USA300 carriers and no S. aureus carriers. Rates of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes were higher in MRSA carriage isolates with an SSTI, compared to MRSA carriage isolates of patients without an SSTI. There was an association between MRSA USA300 carriage and presence of PVL in those diagnosed with an abscess.

Conclusion

Children younger than two years were at highest risk for MRSA USA300 carriage. Lower income, recent antibiotic use, and previous or family history of SSTI were risk factors for MRSA USA300 carriage. There is a high association between MRSA USA300 nasal/axillary carriage and presence of PVL in those with abscesses.

Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society

It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremic pneumonia

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremic pneumonia is an uncommon cause of hospitalization, with a high mortality rate. However, published reports are scarce and have included a small number of cases. All patients with S. aureus bacteremic pneumonia were prospectively collected in our institution from 2000 to 2014, and a retrospective revision was performed to identify risk factors associated with methicillin resistance and to update the mortality of this entity. A total of 98 patients were admitted: 57.1 % were due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 42.8 % due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). In 40 patients (40.8 %), the infection was community acquired. Thirteen were ventilator-associated pneumonia episodes. The most frequent comorbidities were chronic lung disease (34.7 %), chronic renal failure (31.6 %), diabetes mellitus (29.6 %), and cardiovascular disease (31.6 %). Septic shock was present in 46 patients (46.9 %). The 30-day mortality was 46.9 %. MRSA infections occurred in older patients, more frequently with cardiovascular diseases, and they had received antibiotic treatment in the previous month more often than MSSA-infected patients. Patients with infection due to MSSA presented more frequently with septic shock, but they received more frequently appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy than patients with MRSA pneumonia (96 % vs. 38.1 %), and no differences in mortality were observed between both groups. In conclusion, S. aureus bacteremic pneumonia is a severe infection that, nowadays, affects people with comorbidities and the mortality is still high.

Effect of maternal skin-to-skin contact on decolonization of Methicillin-Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus in neonatal intensive care units: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Decolonization with topical antibiotics is necessary to control outbreaks of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), but can trigger bacterial resistance. The objective of this study was to determine whether skin-to-skin contact of newborns colonized with Methicillin-Oxacillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Methicillin-Oxacillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA/MRSE) with their mothers could be an effective alternative to promote bacterial decolonization of newborns’ nostrils.

Methods

We performed a randomized clinical trial with 102 newborns admitted to the NICU in three hospitals in São Luís, Brazil. Inclusion criteria were birth weight of 1300 to 1800 g, more than 4 days of hospitalization, newborns with positive nostril cultures for MRSA and/or multidrug-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and mothers not colonized by these bacteria. We used a random number algorithm for randomization. Allocation was performed using sealed opaque envelopes. Skin-to-skin contact was given twice a day for 60 minutes for seven consecutive days. The control group received routine care without skin-to-skin contact. There was no masking of newborn’s mothers or researchers but the individuals who carried out bacterial cultures and assessed results were kept blind to group allocation. The primary outcome was colonization status of newborns’ nostrils after 7 days of intervention. The directional hypothesis was that more newborns who receive skin-to-skin holding 2 hours/day for 7 days than newborns who receive normal care will be decolonized.

Results

Decolonization of MRSA/MRSE was greater in the intervention group (Risk Ratio = 2.27; 95% CI 1.27-4.07, p-value = 0.003). Number Needed to Treat (NNT) was 4.0 (95% CI 2.2 – 9.4). After adjustment for the possible confounding effects of small for gestational age birth, antibiotic use, need for resuscitation, sex and cesarean delivery, skin-to-skin contact remained strongly associated with decolonization of newborns’ nostrils from MRSA/MRSE bacteria (p = 0.007). There was no need to interrupt the trial for safety reasons.

Conclusion

Skin-to-skin contact might be an effective and safe method for promoting decolonization of newborns’ nostrils colonized by MRSA/MRSE.

Trial Registration

The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01498133, November 21, 2011).

Does the nose know? An update on MRSA decolonization strategies

Colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important step in the pathogenesis of active infection and is a key factor in the epidemiology of MRSA infection. Decolonization of patients found to have MRSA carriage may be of value in certain patient populations, especially those undergoing elective surgery. However, the most commonly used agent for decolonization, mupirocin, comes with a considerable risk of resistance if widely employed. Recent studies of other novel agents for decolonization show promise, but further research is necessary. This review focuses on the pathogenesis from MRSA colonization to infection, identifies the risk factors for colonization, and summarizes decolonization strategies, including novel approaches that may have a role in decreasing MRSA disease burden.

Predictive value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab PCR assay for MRSA pneumonia

Pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with poor outcomes and frequently merits empirical antibiotic consideration despite its relatively low incidence. Nasal colonization with MRSA is associated with clinical MRSA infection and can be reliably detected using the nasal swab PCR assay. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the nasal swab MRSA PCR in predicting MRSA pneumonia. A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary care center from January 2009 to July 2011. All patients with confirmed pneumonia who had both a nasal swab MRSA PCR test and a bacterial culture within predefined time intervals were included in the study. These data were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for clinically confirmed MRSA pneumonia. Four hundred thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of cases were classified as either health care-associated (HCAP) (54.7%) or community-acquired (CAP) (34%) pneumonia. MRSA nasal PCR was positive in 62 (14.3%) cases. MRSA pneumonia was confirmed by culture in 25 (5.7%) cases. The MRSA PCR assay demonstrated 88.0% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 35.4% and a negative predictive value of 99.2%. In patients with pneumonia, the MRSA PCR nasal swab has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia in populations with low MRSA pneumonia incidence. In cases of culture-negative pneumonia where initial empirical antibiotics include an MRSA-active agent, a negative MRSA PCR swab can be reasonably used to guide antibiotic de-escalation.

Utility of prior screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in predicting resistance of S. aureus infections

BACKGROUND

Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is intended to reduce nosocomial spread by identifying patients colonized by MRSA. Given the widespread use of this screening, we evaluated its potential clinical utility in predicting the resistance of clinical isolates of S. aureus.

METHODS

We conducted a 2-year retrospective cohort study that included patients with documented clinical infection with S. aureus and prior screening for MRSA. We determined test characteristics, including sensitivity and specificity, of screening for predicting the resistance of subsequent S. aureus isolates.

RESULTS

Of 510 patients included in the study, 53 (10%) had positive results from MRSA screening, and 79 (15%) of infecting isolates were resistant to methicillin. Screening for MRSA predicted methicillin resistance of the infecting isolate with 99% (95% confidence interval [CI] 98%-100%) specificity and 63% (95% CI 52%-74%) sensitivity. When screening swabs were obtained within 48 hours before isolate collection, sensitivity increased to 91% (95% CI 71%-99%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 97%-100%), yielding a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (95% CI 0.01-0.3) and a negative predictive value of 98% (95% CI 95%-100%). The time between swab and isolate collection was a significant predictor of concordance of methicillin resistance in swabs and isolates (odds ratio 6.6, 95% CI 1.6-28.2).

INTERPRETATION

A positive result from MRSA screening predicted methicillin resistance in a culture-positive clinical infection with S. aureus. Negative results on MRSA screening were most useful for excluding methicillin resistance of a subsequent infection with S. aureus when the screening swab was obtained within 48 hours before collection of the clinical isolate.

Multiple site surveillance cultures as a predictor of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization density, colonization site, and probability of infection in a frequently screened cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS

Patients had swab samples tested for MRSA at admission to the ICU, discharge from the ICU, and twice weekly during their ICU stay, and they were followed up for development of MRSA infection. Swab test results were analyzed to determine the proportion of patients colonized and the proportion colonized at each screening site. Hazard of MRSA infection (rate of infection per day at risk) was calculated using a Cox proportional hazards analysis, and risk factors for MRSA infection, including presence of MRSA, degree of colonization, and pattern of colonization were determined.

RESULTS

Among the 4,194 patient episodes, 238 (5.7%) had screening results that were positive for MRSA, and there were 34 cases of MRSA infection. The hazard ratio (HR) for developing an infection increased as more sites were colonized (HR, 3.4 for being colonized at more than 1 site compared with colonization at 1 site [95% confidence interval, 1.2-9.9]). Colonization site was predictive of developing infection (HR for nose or throat colonization compared with no colonization, 168 [95% confidence interval, 69-407]).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the hazard of developing an infection was higher when more sites were colonized and that certain sites were more predictive of infection than others. These results may be useful for predicting infection in ICU patients and may influence treatment.

A trial of discontinuation of empiric vancomycin therapy in patients with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus health care-associated pneumonia

Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) guidelines recommend de-escalating initial antibiotic therapy based on results from lower-respiratory-tract cultures. In the absence of adequate lower respiratory cultures, physicians are sometimes reluctant to discontinue empirical vancomycin, which is given for suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) HCAP. We evaluated a strategy of discontinuing vancomycin if both nasal and throat cultures were negative for MRSA when lower-respiratory-tract cultures were not available. An antimicrobial stewardship team identified patients receiving empirical vancomycin for suspected or proven HCAP but for whom adequate lower-respiratory-tract cultures were not available. Nasal and throat swab specimens were obtained and plated on MRSA selective media. If both nasal and throat MRSA cultures were negative, the stewardship team recommended discontinuation of empirical vancomycin. Demographic and clinical aspects, a clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) on the day of the stewardship recommendation, and mortality of patients for whom vancomycin was discontinued were obtained by retrospective chart review. A convenience sample of 91 patients with nasal and throat cultures negative for MRSA in the absence of adequate respiratory cultures had empirical vancomycin therapy discontinued. A retrospective review revealed that 88 (97%) patients had a CPIS of ≤6 on the day of the stewardship recommendation. In-hospital mortality (7.7%) was similar to that of a previous study of de-escalation of antibiotics in pneumonia patients without adequate cultures. In the absence of adequate lower-respiratory-tract cultures, it is reasonable to discontinue empirical vancomycin HCAP therapy in patients with negative MRSA nasal and throat cultures and a CPIS of <6.

How important is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia and what is best antimicrobial therapy?

The emergence of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus has raised issues regarding the importance of methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and its optimal treatment. Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) is an important cause of CAP because of the high mortality if not suspected early, and its occurrence in young patients with long life expectancy. Certain clinical features can increase the probability of CA-MRSA as a cause of CAP. The consistent trend toward better outcomes for documented MRSA pneumonia suggests that linezolid be considered the drug of choice for documented MRSA CAP, especially for CA-MRSA.

Whole genome sequencing in the prevention and control of Staphylococcus aureus infection

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus remains a leading cause of hospital-acquired infection but weaknesses inherent in currently available typing methods impede effective infection prevention and control. The high resolution offered by whole genome sequencing has the potential to revolutionise our understanding and management of S. aureus infection.

AIM

To outline the practicalities of whole genome sequencing and discuss how it might shape future infection control practice.

METHODS

We review conventional typing methods and compare these with the potential offered by whole genome sequencing.

FINDINGS

In contrast with conventional methods, whole genome sequencing discriminates down to single nucleotide differences and allows accurate characterisation of transmission events and outbreaks and additionally provides information about the genetic basis of phenotypic characteristics, including antibiotic susceptibility and virulence. However, translating its potential into routine practice will depend on affordability, acceptable turnaround times and on creating a reliable standardised bioinformatic infrastructure.

CONCLUSION

Whole genome sequencing has the potential to provide a universal test that facilitates outbreak investigation, enables the detection of emerging strains and predicts their clinical importance.

A negative nares screen in combination with absence of clinical risk factors can be used to identify patients with very low likelihood of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a Veterans Affairs hospital

BACKGROUND

Screening for nares carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) could be used to identify patients at reduced risk for MRSA infection. However, recent studies suggest that negative results of nares surveillance testing are not reliable to predict a low risk for MRSA infection.

METHODS

To derive a clinical prediction rule, logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of MRSA infection in patients with negative nares surveillance results. To validate the prediction rule and modifications of the rule, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated in a prospective cohort of inpatients receiving empiric vancomycin.

RESULTS

A prediction rule that included 8 clinical risk factors and nares surveillance results was sensitive with NPV of 99.9%. In the validation cohort, 43 of 451 (10%) patients receiving empiric vancomycin had MRSA infection. In comparison with nares surveillance results (sensitivity, 72%; NPV, 96%), the prediction rule was more reliable for prediction of low risk for MRSA infection (sensitivity, 93%; NPV, 98%). A modified rule that included additional indications for empiric MRSA coverage based on practice guidelines reliably predicted MRSA infection (sensitivity, 100%) while excluding those at low risk (NPV, 100%).

CONCLUSION

Negative nares screening results in combination with absence of certain clinical risk factors or syndromes could provide a useful strategy to predict patients with low likelihood of MRSA infection.

Molecular laboratory tests for the diagnosis of respiratory tract infection due to Staphylococcus aureus

When Staphylococcus aureus is the cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia or a bacterial infection following influenza, the infections are devastating if not treated promptly. Disease due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) continues to be of concern throughout most of the United States. Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared polymerase chain reaction tests for detection of MRSA in nasal swab specimens; however, there are no FDA-cleared tests for identifying S. aureus in purulent respiratory secretions. The real-time polymerase chain reaction tests for S. aureus (primarily MRSA) in nares provide results in <2 h and have sensitivities ranging from 95% to 100%, with specificities of 96%-99%; these results are comparable to that of standard cultures, which can take up to 3-4 days for final results. The FDA is encouraged to work closely with industry providers to expedite the evaluation and clearance process for molecular diagnostic devices detecting S. aureus (including MRSA) in the diagnosis of respiratory tract infection.