Assessment of 30/20-Microgram Disk Content versus MIC Results for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibility test method development and quality control ranges for MIC and disk diffusion tests

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination developed to treat hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor with potent activity against Ambler classes A, C, and D serine β-lactamases and restores sulbactam activity against multidrug-resistant ABC. Studies were conducted to establish sulbactam-durlobactam antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for both broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and disk diffusion tests as well as quality control (QC) ranges. To establish the MIC test method, combinations of sulbactam and durlobactam were evaluated using a panel of genetically characterized A. baumannii isolates which were categorized as predicted to be susceptible or resistant based on the spectrum of β-lactamase inhibition by durlobactam. MIC testing with doubling dilutions of sulbactam with a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL of durlobactam resulted in the greatest discrimination of the pre-defined susceptible and resistant strains. Similarly, the sulbactam/durlobactam 10/10 µg disk concentration showed the best discrimination as well as correlation with the MIC test. A. baumannii NCTC 13304 was selected for QC purposes because it assesses the activity of both sulbactam and durlobactam with clear endpoints. Multi-laboratory QC studies were conducted according to CLSI M23 Tier 2 criteria. A sulbactam-durlobactam broth MIC QC range of 0.5/4-2/4 µg/mL and a zone diameter QC range of 24-30 mm were determined for A. baumannii NCTC 13304 and have been approved by CLSI. These studies will enable clinical laboratories to perform susceptibility tests with accurate and reproducible methods.

[Application of Rapid Detection Method Based on NG-Test® CARBA 5 in Bloodstream Infections Associated With Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales]

Objective

To compare the consistency and accuracy of a rapid test method and a traditional test method for pathogen identification, antimicrobial susceptibility and carbapenemase type identification of positive blood culture samples.

Methods

A total of 51 positive blood culture samples of bloodstream infection (BSI) were collected between March 2022 and May 2022. All samples were found to be "positive for Gram-negative bacilli" according to the blood smear results. The rapid method was adopted to perform rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (RAST) and analysis of the positive blood culture samples. According to the RAST result interpretation standards, NG-Test® CARBA 5 was used for rapid carbapenemase detection of the imipenem-resistant strains and the results were confirmed by PCR. In addition, mass spectrometry, VITEK 2 Compact drug sensitivity analysis, and carbapenemase type identification were performed with the colonies cultured with positive samples according to the traditional method.

Results

In the identification of bacteria, the rapid method and the traditional method had 100% consistency rate in the identification results of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. In the antimicrobial susceptibility test, the consistency rate between the results of the two methods was high and the consistency rate for results for susceptibility to imipenem was 100%. In the identification of carbapenemase type, 18 serinase-producing strains and 3 metal-β-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacterales were detected by the traditional method. With the rapid method, 18 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing strains, 2 New Delhi metallo-betalactamase (NDM)-producing strains, and 1 imipenem enzyme (IMP)-producing strain were identified in the blood culture samples by using a testing kit. Compared with the PCR results, the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid test for determining carbapenemase types were 100%. In this study, we investigated a rapid method for bacteria and carbapenemase type identification of positive blood culture specimens and found that the turnaround time (TAT) of the rapid method was reduced by 1.94 days on average in comparison with the TAT of the traditional method.

Conclusion

The rapid method established in the study can effectively shorten the TAT for pathogenic microorganism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test of blood culture samples, and the joint report of colloidal gold carbapenemase type identification results can provide a reference for clinicians to use antibiotics appropriately and accurately manage multi-drug resistant bacterial infections.

Performance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam 30/20-μg and 10/4-μg Disks for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ceftazidime-avibactam, a new β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is active against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and has became available for clinical use in China in the latter half of 2019. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the disk diffusion test with ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg and 30/20-μg disks, compared with the reference broth microdilution method, with a collection of 467 Enterobacterales and 182 P. aeruginosa nonduplicate clinical isolates. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that the categorical agreement (CA) of ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg disk testing for all tested Enterobacterales isolates was 99.8%, with 0.5% very major errors (VMEs) and no major error (ME). The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg disk testing for all tested P. aeruginosa isolates was 87.9%, with 15.5% MEs and no VME. The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 30/20-μg disk testing for all tested Enterobacterales isolates was 99.4%, with 1.5% VMEs and no ME. The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 30/20-μg disk testing for all tested P. aeruginosa isolates was 91.8%, with 2.5% VMEs and 9.9% MEs. Overall, ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg disk testing showed superior performance and was more suitable for assessment of the susceptibility of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates. IMPORTANCE Multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa strains have become a global public threat, with the emergence and prevalence of plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases disseminated worldwide. Ceftazidime-avibactam, which is commercially available, has shown excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates. Moreover, ceftazidime-avibactam has shown promise in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant isolates. The disk diffusion test for ceftazidime-avibactam is the most common antimicrobial susceptibility testing method in most laboratories in China. The accurate detection of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility is of great significance for the rational clinical application of drugs. Here, we evaluated the performance of the ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg and 30/20-μg disk diffusion tests, compared with the reference broth microdilution method, with clinical Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing

Multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a serious global threat due to the rapid global spread and limited antimicrobial options for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) infections sustained by MDR pathogens. Recently, novel β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) have been developed for the treatment of DTR infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although novel βL-βLICs exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo activities against MDR pathogens, emerging resistances to these novel molecules have recently been reported. Resistance to novel βL-βLICs is due to several mechanisms including porin deficiencies, increasing carbapenemase expression and/or enzyme mutations. In this review, we summarized the main mechanisms related to the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in MDR Gram-negative micro-organisms. We focused on antimicrobial activities and resistance traits with particular regard to molecular mechanisms related to resistance to novel βL-βLICs. Lastly, we described and discussed the main detection methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of such molecules. With increasing reports of resistance to novel βL-βLICs, continuous attention should be maintained on the monitoring of the phenotypic traits of MDR pathogens, into the characterization of related mechanisms, and on the emergence of cross-resistance to these novel antimicrobials.

Evaluation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Enterobacterales-Containing Blood Cultures in China

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is defined by the presence of microbes in the bloodstream and has high mortality. Early antimicrobial therapy is key to treating BSI patients. Because of potential antimicrobial resistance, rapid evaluation for the most suitable antimicrobial therapy is important for appropriate treatment. In China, the current workflow of microbiological diagnosis in BSI involves blood culture, species identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, which takes around 3 days. However, this delay could lead to worse symptoms. To rapidly and accurately assess antimicrobial susceptibility, in this study, we applied EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) to determine the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the most frequently detected Enterobacterales sampled in China, including Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Based on EUCAST guidelines, we evaluated its efficiencies with six commercially available antimicrobials, including imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), amikacin (30 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), with bacterium-spiked blood cultures. In addition, we developed potential breakpoints for a recently introduced antimicrobial, 30/20 μg ceftazidime-avibactam, which has high potential for treating multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. Our results showed that EUCAST RAST is a reliable method for rapidly determining the antimicrobial susceptibilities of BSI-causing bacteria in China, with an overall categorical agreement rate at 8 h of ≥90%. The breakpoints developed in this study can categorize the isolates sampled in this study with an accuracy of 93%. Results from our experiments can be applied to clinically determine the microbial susceptibility of BSI-causing bacteria within 8 h and benefit clinical diagnostics for BSI patients.

Assessment of Ceftazidime-Avibactam 30/20-μg Disk, Etest versus Broth Microdilution Results When Tested against Enterobacterales Clinical Isolates

The objective of this research was to evaluate the correlation between inhibitory zones and MIC when testing ceftazidime-avibactam using disk diffusion, Etest, and broth microdilution method established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Four-hundred and 58 isolates of Enterobacterales isolated from 54 medical centers from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2016 to 2020 were collected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion were performed according to the CLSI. Of the 458 Enterobacterales, 17.2% (79/458) and 82.8%(379/458) were resistant or susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam by broth microdilution, respectively. Compared with the broth microdilution method, the categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of the Etest were 99.6% (456/458) and 94.8% (434/458), respectively; the major error (ME) and very major error (VME) were both 0.2% (1/458). For disk diffusion, the CA and VME were 99.8% (457/458) and 0.2% (1/458), respectively. For Escherichia coli, the CA and EA of the Etest were 100% and 97.1% (135/139), respectively. The CA of the disk diffusion was 100%. For Klebsiella pneumoniae, the CA and EA of the Etest were 99.3% (288/290) and 93.4% (271/290), respectively, the ME and VME were both 0.3% (1/290). The CA and VME of disk diffusion were 99.7% (289/290) and 0.3% (1/290), respectively. For other Enterobacterales, the CA and EA of the Etest were 100% and 96.6% (28/29), respectively. The CA of the disk diffusion was 100%. Ceftazidime-avibactam disk diffusion (30/20-μg disks) and Etest demonstrated good performance for ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility testing against Enterobacterales clinical isolates. IMPORTANCE Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, especially for extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, are disseminating rapidly around the world. Treatment options for these infections are limited, which prompt the development of novel or combinational therapies to combat the infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. The newly available β-lactam combination agent ceftazidime-avibactam has been demonstrated good in vitro and in vivo activity against ESBL, AmpC, KPC-2, or OXA-48-like-producing isolates and has shown promise in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections. Concerningly, there are few available automated systems for ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility testing, and the broth microdilution method is hard to perform in most routine laboratories. Therefore, we urgently need an economical and practical method for the accurate detection of ceftazidime-avibactam activity against Gram-negative bacilli. Here, we evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion and Etest compared with the reference broth microdilution method against Enterobacterales clinical strains.

Comparison of Etest and broth microdilution for evaluating the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae to ceftaroline and of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam

OBJECTIVES

Decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftaroline (CPT) has been reported during antimicrobial resistance surveillance and therapy. Conventional laboratories are unable to provide timely susceptibility testing for CZA and CPT because these antimicrobial agents are not incorporated in automated susceptibility testing systems.

METHODS

We evaluated Etest and the Sensititre broth microdilution (BMD) method for testing CZA against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and CPT against important Gram-positive cocci bloodstream isolates. Genotypes of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales were also determined using the Xpert® Carba-R assay.

RESULTS

Etest showed ≥90% agreement with Sensititre BMD for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (n = 187), carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) (n = 28) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 35); however, the very major error rate exceeded 3%. Agreement between Etest and Sensititre BMD was <90% for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) (n = 81), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (n = 92) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 170). Both agents remained potent with a high susceptibility rate by Sensititre BMD as follows: CZA against CRKP (95.0%), CREC (89.3%) and CRPA (84.5%); and CPT against MSSA (100.0%), MRSA (95.3%) and S. pneumoniae (94.3%). CZA was active against blaKPC-carrying CRKP (98.5% susceptible), and resistance in the majority of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales isolates (6 of 10 CRKP and 2 of 3 CREC) was due to the presence of a metallo-β-lactamase gene.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that interpretation of susceptibility results obtained by Etest for both agents should be undertaken cautiously and remains challenging.

Ceftazidime/avibactam and eravacycline susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in two Greek tertiary teaching hospitals

The present study evaluated the carbapenem resistance mechanisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated in two Greek tertiary teaching hospitals and their susceptibility to currently used and novel antimicrobial agents.Forty-seven carbapenem resistant K. pneumoniae strains were collected in G. Papanikolaou and Ippokrateio hospital of Thessaloniki between 2016 and 2018. Strain identification and antimicrobial susceptibility was conducted by Vitek 2 system (Biomérieux France). Susceptibility against new antimicrobial agents was examined by disk diffusion method. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect blaKPC, blaVIM, blaNDM and blaOXA-48 genes.The meropenem-EDTA and meropenem-boronic acid synergy test performed on the 24 K. pneumoniae strains demonstrated that 8 (33.3%) yielded positive for metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL) and 16 (66.6%) for K. pneumonia carbapenemases (KPC) production. Colistin demonstrated the highest in vitro activity (87.7%) among the 47 K. pneumoniae strains followed by gentamicin (76.5%) and tigecycline (51%). Among new antibiotics ceftazidime/avibactam showed the highest sensitivity (76.6%) in all strains followed by eravacycline (66.6%). The blaKPC gene was present in 30 strains (63.8%), the blaNDM in 11 (23.4%) and the blaVIM in 6 (12.8%). The blaOXA-48 gene was not detected.Well established antimicrobial agents such as colistin, gentamicin and tigecycline and novel antibiotics like ceftazidime/avibactam and eravacycline can be reliable options for the treatment of invasive infections caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion method for detection of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China

Background

Ceftazidime-avibactam was approved in China in 2019 for treating complicated intra-abdominal infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and infections caused by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which treatment options are limited. However, no currently available commercial systems have been approved for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of ceftazidime-avibactam in China. Here, we evaluated the Etest and disk diffusion method for detecting the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa in China.

Results

In total, 194 Enterobacterales and 77 P. aeruginosa isolates, which were divided into a random selection group (140 Enterobacterales and 46 P. aeruginosa isolates) and stock group (54 Enterobacterales and 31 P. aeruginosa isolates), were assessed by the Etest, disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. Minimum inhibitory concentrations and zone diameters were interpreted according to the CLSI supplement M100 30th edition. For all 271 tested isolates, no very major errors were found by using Etest, whereas the overall major error rate was 2.0% (4/203). The overall categorical agreement rates of Etest for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 99.5% (193/194) and 96.1% (74/77), respectively, and the essential agreement rates were 95.9% (186/194) and 94.8% (73/77), respectively. The disk diffusion method showed that the very major error and major error rates were 1.5% (3/204) and 2.5% (5/203), respectively. Overall categorical agreement rates values of the disk diffusion method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 98.5% (191/194) and 93.5% (72/77) compared with broth microdilution, respectively.

Conclusions

For Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, both the Etest and disk diffusion method showed acceptable performance as alternatives to the standard broth microdilution method for clinical treatment interpretation. Application of the disk diffusion method in Enterobacterales was slightly better than that in P. aeruginosa.

Correlation between Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Results when Testing Ceftazidime-Avibactam against a Challenge Collection of Enterobacterales Isolates: Results from a Multilaboratory Study

We assessed the ceftazidime-avibactam disk diffusion breakpoints that provide the lowest discrepancy error rates by testing an Enterobacterales isolate collection with ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values near the breakpoints. Isolates (n = 112) were susceptibility tested by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods in 3 laboratories. Current disk diffusion breakpoints (≥21/≤20 mm for susceptible/resistant) provided the lowest error rates, but confirmatory MIC testing is indicated for isolates with inhibition zones of 20 to 22 mm.

Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections

ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) are among the most common opportunistic pathogens in nosocomial infections. ESKAPE pathogens distinguish themselves from normal ones by developing a high level of antibiotic resistance that involves multiple mechanisms. Contemporary therapeutic strategies which are potential options in combating ESKAPE bacteria need further investigation. Herein, a broad overview of the antimicrobial research on ESKAPE pathogens over the past five years is provided with prospective clinical applications.