Factors influencing broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test results for dalbavancin, a new glycopeptide agent

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides

The long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) dalbavancin and oritavancin are semisynthetic antimicrobials with broad and potent activity against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. While they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, their pharmacological properties suggest a potential role of these agents for the treatment of deep-seated and severe infections, such as bloodstream and bone and joint infections. The use of these antimicrobials is particularly appealing when prolonged therapy, early discharge, and avoidance of long-term intravascular catheter access are desirable or when multidrug-resistant bacteria are suspected. This review describes the current evidence for the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in the treatment of invasive infections, as well as the hurdles that are preventing their optimal use. Moreover, this review discusses the current knowledge gaps that need to be filled to understand the potential role of LGPs in highly needed clinical scenarios and the ongoing clinical studies that aim to address these voids in the upcoming years.

Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing and Breakpoint Setting

Susceptibility testing of polymyxins has been subject to intensive review and revision in recent years. A joint working group was established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing to establish a reference method. Issues examined included the effects of divalent cations, binding to laboratory materials, and addition of polysorbate 80. The working group recommended the use of broth microdilution without the addition of polysorbate 80 as the reference method. Published studies have shown that other testing methods, including agar dilution, disk diffusion and gradient diffusion, have unacceptably high levels of very major errors compared to the reference method, and are not recommended for routine laboratory use. Most data were for the testing of colistin; less information was available for polymyxin B. The joint working group was also asked to consider the setting of clinical breakpoints for relevant pathogens. This task involved examination of the available pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic-toxicodynamic and population clinical pharmacokinetic data. All current pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets are based on MICs generated using the reference broth dilution procedure.

Effects of Microplate Type and Broth Additives on Microdilution MIC Susceptibility Assays

The determination of antibiotic potency against bacterial strains by assessment of their minimum inhibitory concentration normally uses a standardized broth microdilution assay procedure developed more than 50 years ago. However, certain antibiotics require modified assay conditions in order to observe optimal activity.

The determination of antibiotic potency against bacterial strains by assessment of their minimum inhibitory concentration normally uses a standardized broth microdilution assay procedure developed more than 50 years ago. However, certain antibiotics require modified assay conditions in order to observe optimal activity. For example, daptomycin requires medium supplemented with Ca²⁺, and the lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin require Tween 80 to be added to the growth medium to prevent the depletion of free drug via adsorption to the plastic microplate. In this report, we examine systematically the effects of several different plate types on microdilution broth MIC values for a set of antibiotics against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, both in medium alone and in medium supplemented with the commonly used additives Tween 80, lysed horse blood, and 50% human serum. We observed very significant differences in measured MICs (up to 100-fold) for some lipophilic antibiotics, such as the Gram-positive lipoglycopeptide dalbavancin and the Gram-negative lipopeptide polymyxins, and found that nonspecific binding plates can replace the need for surfactant additives. Microtiter plate types and any additives should be specified when reporting broth dilution MIC values, as results can vary dramatically for some classes of antibiotics.

Comparative Evaluation of Broth Microdilution with Polystyrene and Glass-Coated Plates, Agar Dilution, E-Test, Vitek, and Disk Diffusion for Susceptibility Testing of Colistin and Polymyxin B on Carbapenem-Resistant Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing threat of multidrug-resistant organisms, such as Acinetobacter baumannii, the polymyxin class of drugs (colistin and polymyxin B) has become popular in clinical practice. A better understanding of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for colistin and polymyxin B is needed for optimal patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing for colistin and polymyxin B using the following methods: broth microdilution (BMD) (glass-coated plates [BMD-Gs] and polystyrene plates [BMD-Ps]), agar dilution (AD), E-test^®, Vitek^®, and disk diffusion. Using BMD as the gold standard, comparative analysis between different methods was carried out.

RESULTS

With BMD-Gs as reference, reliability was high for BMD-Ps and moderate for AD and Vitek for both the drugs. Similar results were obtained when the BMD-P was used as reference, but drug-polystyrene interaction was observed.

CONCLUSION

Different susceptibility testing methods for polymyxins show great variation in their results and BMD using glass-coated plates can be considered the best candidate for gold standard.

In vitro culture conditions affecting minimal inhibitory concentration of bedaquiline against M. tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

In developing a standardized drug susceptibility test for bedaquiline, it is very important to know which parameters might impact its activity in vitro and result in false resistance of the bacterium to bedaquiline. We aimed to assess the impact of different in vitro conditions on the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bedaquiline against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv reference strain.

METHODS

The MIC of M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain was determined under different conditions such as inoculum size, pH, temperatures, log and stationary phase cultures, protein concentration, Tween 80 concentration, and labware plastics.

RESULTS

Increases in bedaquiline MIC were observed with variations in inoculum size for M. tuberculosis H37Rv on agar or in broth, in protein concentration and labware plastics on agar, and with variations in pH and Tween 80 concentrations in broth.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to obtain reproducible MIC results, bedaquiline MIC should be assessed using polystyrene plates or tubes, at pH 7, with a Tween 80 concentration of 0.02%, without protein enrichment and with an inoculum size up to 10(7) colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL on 7H11 agar or with 10(5)CFU/mL in 7H9 broth.

Evaluation of the bactericidal activity of Telavancin against Staphylococcus aureus using revised testing guidelines

The in vitro broth microdilution testing method for telavancin, a lipoglycopeptide active against S. aureus, was revised in 2014 to include polysorbate-80 in the test media. This study evaluates the bactericidal activity of telavancin against S. aureus in media containing polysorbate-80 by in vitro time-kill analysis alongside relevant comparators.

Analysis of MIC and Disk Diffusion Testing Variables for Gepotidacin and Comparator Agents against Select Bacterial Pathogens

This study was conducted to determine the effect of testing parameters on the in vitro activity of gepotidacin, a new triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial agent for the treatment of conventional and biothreat pathogens. CLSI methods, and variations of those methods, were used to test 10 Staphylococcus aureus, 10 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 10 Haemophilus influenzae, and 5 Escherichia coli isolates by MIC and 30 S. aureus, 15 S. pneumoniae, and 15 S. pyogenes isolates by disk diffusion (DD) methods. Levofloxacin and linezolid were tested as comparator agents for MIC and DD methods, respectively. Broth microdilution (BMD), macrodilution (MD), and agar dilution (AD) methods were compared. Variations in media, temperature, incubation time, CO₂ level, and inoculum concentration were tested by all methods, and variations in pH, calcium, magnesium, zinc, potassium, thymidine, and polysorbate 80 levels were tested by BMD and DD. The addition of albumin, serum, and lung surfactant was studied by BMD. The variables that impacted the results the most were high inoculum and pH 5.5 (no growth of H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae by BMD). Gepotidacin AD MIC levels were increased and disk zone diameters were decreased for all species in 10% CO₂ incubation. The following variables had a minimal effect on gepotidacin results: pH, agar method, atmospheric condition, temperature, and addition of serum and albumin for broth methods. There were also some slight differences in gepotidacin disk results between disk manufacturers and some agar types and also with potassium and thymidine for S. pneumoniae For all other variations, gepotidacin MIC and disk results were considered comparable to reference results.

Telavancin: mechanisms of action, in vitro activity, and mechanisms of resistance

Telavancin is a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide derivative of vancomycin. Telavancin has a dual mechanism of antibacterial action, disrupting peptidoglycan synthesis and cell membrane function. In 2014, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) revised the antimicrobial susceptibility testing method for telavancin, resulting in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations that are more accurate and reproducible and demonstrate greater in vitro potency than shown with the previous testing method. The CLSI testing method changes coincided with revised telavancin MIC interpretive break point criteria for susceptibility approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for Staphylococcus aureus (≤0.12 µg/mL), Streptococcus pyogenes (≤0.12 µg/mL), Streptococcus agalactiae (≤0.12 µg/mL), Streptococcus anginosus group (≤0.06 µg/mL), and Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin susceptible, ≤0.25 µg/mL). Telavancin is equally potent against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). It demonstrates activity against isolates of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus but is poorly active against vancomycin-resistant S. aureus. It also demonstrates potent activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus spp. (MIC90 ≤0.03 µg/mL). Thus far, it has not been possible to select for high-level telavancin resistance in the laboratory using serially passaged clinical isolates of MRSA and MSSA.

Dalbavancin Activity When Tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolated in Medical Centers on Six Continents (2011 to 2014)

Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide, was approved for use in 2014 by regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. The activity of dalbavancin was also widely assessed by determination of its activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates collected from patients on six continents monitored during two time intervals (2011 to 2013 and 2014). A total of 18,186 pneumococcal isolates were obtained from 49 nations and submitted to a monitoring laboratory as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program for reference susceptibility testing. The potency of dalbavancin against S. pneumoniae was consistent across the years that it was monitored, with the MIC50 and MIC90 being 0.015 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively, and all isolates were inhibited by ≤0.12 μg/ml. The activity of dalbavancin was not adversely influenced by nonsusceptibility to β-lactams (ceftriaxone or penicillin), macrolides, clindamycin, fluoroquinolones, or tetracyclines or multidrug resistance (MDR). Regional variations in dalbavancin activity were not detected, but S. pneumoniae strains isolated in the Asia-Pacific region were more likely to be nonsusceptible to penicillin and ceftriaxone as well as to be MDR than strains isolated in North or South America and Europe. Direct comparisons of potency illustrated that dalbavancin (MIC50 and MIC90, 0.015 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively) was 16-fold or more active than vancomycin (MIC50, 0.25 μg/ml), linezolid (MIC50, 1 μg/ml), levofloxacin (MIC50, 1 μg/ml), ceftriaxone (MIC90, 1 μg/ml), and penicillin (MIC90, 2 μg/ml). In conclusion, dalbavancin had potent and consistent activity against this contemporary (2011 to 2014) collection of S. pneumoniae isolates.

Results from Oritavancin Resistance Surveillance Programs (2011 to 2014): Clarification for Using Vancomycin as a Surrogate To Infer Oritavancin Susceptibility

Measurement of vancomycin susceptibility has been shown to be highly predictive as a surrogate measure of oritavancin susceptibility among clinically indicated Gram-positive species. Results of studying over 30,000 pathogens (from 2011 to 2014) by cross-susceptibility analysis and determining the poor reproducibility of oritavancin-nonsusceptible results showed nearly perfect surrogate testing accuracy (99.86 to 99.94%). Any isolate of an indicated organism species with locally reproducible oritavancin-nonsusceptible results (extremely rare) should be referred to a reference laboratory for confirmation of the results and determination of the resistance mechanism.

A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is performed to assess the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against various bacteria. The AST results, which are expressed as minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are used in research for antimicrobial development and monitoring of resistance development and in the clinical setting for antimicrobial therapy guidance. Dalbavancin is a semi-synthetic lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent that was approved in May 2014 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by Gram-positive organisms. The advantage of dalbavancin over current anti-staphylococcal therapies is its long half-life, which allows for once-weekly dosing. Dalbavancin has activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including both methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] and methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]), coagulase-negative staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus anginosus group, β-hemolytic streptococci and vancomycin susceptible enterococci. Similar to other recent lipoglycopeptide agents, optimization of CLSI and ISO broth susceptibility test methods includes the use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent when preparing stock solutions and polysorbate 80 (P80) to alleviate adherence of the agent to plastic. Prior to the clinical studies and during the initial development of dalbavancin, susceptibility studies were not performed with the use of P-80 and MIC results tended to be 2-4 fold higher and similarly higher MIC results were obtained with the agar dilution susceptibility method. Dalbavancin was first included in CLSI broth microdilution methodology tables in 2005 and amended in 2006 to clarify use of DMSO and P-80. The broth microdilution (BMD) procedure shown here is specific to dalbavancin and is in accordance with the CLSI and ISO methods, with step-by-step detail and focus on the critical steps added for clarity.

Telavancin in vitro activity against a collection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates, including resistant subsets, from the United States

Telavancin had MIC50, MIC90, and MIC100 values of 0.03, 0.06, and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively, against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and non-multidrug-resistant (non-MDR) and MDR subsets. MRSA with elevated MIC values for vancomycin (2 to 4 μg/ml) or daptomycin (1 to 2 μg/ml) had telavancin MIC50 (0.06 μg/ml) values 2-fold higher than those of isolates with lower MIC results (MIC50, 0.03 μg/ml). However, telavancin had MIC90 and MIC100 results of 0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml (100% susceptible), respectively, regardless of the MRSA subset.

Update of the telavancin activity in vitro tested against a worldwide collection of Gram-positive clinical isolates (2013), when applying the revised susceptibility testing method

A revised broth microdilution susceptibility testing method for telavancin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Telavancin activity was assessed against Gram-positive pathogens collected worldwide (2013) using the revised method. A total of 12,346 isolates from 90 sites were included as part of the Telavancin International Surveillance Program for the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Telavancin had MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.03 and 0.06 μg/mL, respectively, against staphylococci, regardless of methicillin susceptibility, and inhibited all Staphylococcus aureus at ≤0.12 μg/mL (revised FDA breakpoint). Telavancin was 8-fold more active than daptomycin (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/mL) and 16- to 32-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC50/90, 1/1 μg/mL) and linezolid (MIC50/90, 1/1 μg/mL) against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. All 692 vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis were inhibited by telavancin (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.12 μg/mL) at ≤0.25 μg/mL (FDA breakpoint), except for 1 strain (MIC, 0.5 μg/mL). All Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis with telavancin MIC values of ≥0.5 and ≥1 μg/mL, respectively, had a VanA phenotype. A comparison data analysis based on the MIC90 demonstrated that telavancin was at least 8-fold more potent than comparators against vancomycin-susceptible enterococci. Streptococci showed telavancin MIC50 values of ≤0.015 μg/mL, except for Streptococcus agalactiae (MIC50, 0.03 μg/mL). These in vitro results obtained by the recently approved susceptibility testing method establish a new benchmark of telavancin activity worldwide.

Baseline activity of telavancin against Gram-positive clinical isolates responsible for documented infections in U.S. hospitals (2011-2012) as determined by the revised susceptibility testing method

Telavancin had MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.03 and 0.06 μg/ml (100.0% susceptible), respectively, against methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Telavancin was active against vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.12 μg/ml; 100% susceptible) and Enterococcus faecium (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 μg/ml), while higher MIC values were obtained against vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (MIC50/90, 1/2 μg/ml) and E. faecalis (MIC50/90, >2/>2 μg/ml). Streptococci showed telavancin modal MIC results of ≤ 0.015 μg/ml, except against Streptococcus agalactiae (i.e., 0.03 μg/ml). This study reestablishes the telavancin spectrum of activity against isolates recovered from the United States (2011-2012) using the revised broth microdilution method.

Revised reference broth microdilution method for testing telavancin: effect on MIC results and correlation with other testing methodologies

The reference broth microdilution (BMD) antimicrobial susceptibility testing method for telavancin was revised to include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent and diluent for frozen-form panel preparation, following the CLSI recommendations for water-insoluble agents. Polysorbate 80 (P-80) was also added to the test medium to minimize proven drug losses associated with binding to plastic surfaces. Four hundred sixty-two Gram-positive isolates, including a challenge set of organisms with reduced susceptibilities to comparator agents, were selected and tested using the revised method for telavancin, and the MIC results were compared with those tested by the previously established method and several Sensititre dry-form BMD panel formulations. The revised method provided MIC results 2- to 8-fold lower than the previous method when tested against staphylococci and enterococci, resulting in MIC50 values of 0.03 to 0.06 μg/ml for staphylococci and 0.03 and 0.12 μg/ml for Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, respectively. Less-significant MIC decreases (1 to 2 log2 dilution steps) were observed when testing streptococci in broth supplemented with blood, which showed similar MIC50 values for both methods. However, Streptococcus pneumoniae had MIC50 results of 0.008 and 0.03 μg/ml when tested by the revised and previous methods, respectively. Highest essential agreement rates (≥94.0%) were noted for one candidate dry-form panel formulation compared to the revised test. The revised BMD method provides lower MIC results for telavancin, especially when tested against staphylococci and enterococci. This is secondary to the use of DMSO for panel production and the presence of P-80, which ensure the proper telavancin testing concentration and result in a more accurate MIC determination. Moreover, earlier studies where the previous method was applied underestimated the in vitro drug potency.

Quality control MIC ranges used for telavancin with application of a revised CLSI reference broth microdilution method

The telavancin broth microdilution susceptibility testing method was revised, which provides MIC results lower than those obtained by the previous method. This study was performed to reestablish the quality control ranges for telavancin when tested against the strains (updated MIC range) Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 (0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml), Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 (0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml), and Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 (0.004 to 0.015 μg/ml).

Colistin MIC variability by method for contemporary clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli

In vitro evaluation of colistin susceptibility is fraught with complications, due in part to the inherent cationic properties of colistin. In addition, no reference method has been defined against which to compare the results of colistin susceptibility testing. This study systematically evaluated the available methods for colistin MIC testing in two phases. In phase I, colistin MICs were determined in 107 fresh clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) by broth microdilution with polysorbate 80 (BMD-T), broth macrodilution (TDS), and the Etest. In phase II, 50 of these isolates, 10 of which were colistin resistant, were tested in parallel using BMD-T, TDS, agar dilution, broth microdilution without polysorbate 80 (BMD), and the TREK Gram-negative extra MIC format (GNXF) Sensititre. The Etest was also performed on these 50 isolates using Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) from three different manufacturers. Colistin MIC results obtained from the five methods were compared to the MIC results obtained using BMD-T, the method that enables the highest nominal concentration of colistin in the test medium. Essential agreement ranged from 34% (BMD) to 83% (TDS), whereas categorical agreement was >90% for all methods except for BMD, which was 88%. Very major errors (VMEs) (i.e., false susceptibility) for the Etest were found in 47 to 53% of the resistant isolates, depending on the manufacturer of the MHA that was used. In contrast, VMEs were found for 10% (n = 1) of the resistant isolates by BMD and 0% of the isolates by the TDS, agar dilution, and Sensititre methods. Based on these data, we urge clinical laboratories to be aware of the variable results that can occur when using different methods for colistin MIC testing and, in particular, to use caution with the Etest.

Use of a surfactant (polysorbate 80) to improve MIC susceptibility testing results for polymyxin B and colistin

Accurate determination of in vitro activity for polymyxin class agents has consistently been a problem due to their physical-chemical characteristics that can be influenced by the constituents of reference and/or standardized susceptibility testing methods. We evaluated the impact of using polysorbate 80 (P-80), a surfactant, in reference broth microdilution (BMD) methods when testing polymyxin B and colistin against 247 clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae (124 strains), Acinetobacter spp. (60 strains), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (63 strains). All testing was performed in frozen-form BMD panels with and without 0.002% P-80. MIC results for both polymyxins were generally 4- to 8-fold lower when P-80 was added to the testing broth compared to Mueller-Hinton broth without the surfactant. Decreases were greatest in organisms having MIC values at ≤2 μg/mL and among Acinetobacter spp. Polymyxins should be tested with P-80 to more accurately assess the potencies of these agents necessary to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

Activities of dalbavancin against a worldwide collection of 81,673 gram-positive bacterial isolates

Dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, was evaluated against 81,673 isolates of staphylococci, enterococci, and streptococci collected from 33 countries during worldwide resistance surveillance (2002 to 2007). Regardless of susceptibility to oxacillin, comparable potencies for dalbavancin against Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from all countries were noted (MIC(90), 0.06 to 0.12 microg/ml). Vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus spp. had dalbavancin MIC(90)s comparable to those for staphylococci, whereas vancomycin-resistant strains were more resistant (MIC(50), >4 microg/ml). beta-Hemolytic and viridians group streptococci were very susceptible to dalbavancin (MIC(90), <or=0.03 microg/ml). Overall, dalbavancin was >or=16-fold more active than vancomycin against the monitored gram-positive species.

Effect of polysorbate 80 on oritavancin binding to plastic surfaces: implications for susceptibility testing

Oritavancin, a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide with activity against gram-positive bacteria, has multiple mechanisms of action, including the inhibition of cell wall synthesis and the perturbation of the membrane potential. Approved guidelines for broth microdilution MIC assays with dalbavancin, another lipoglycopeptide, require inclusion of 0.002% polysorbate 80. To investigate the potential impact of polysorbate 80 on oritavancin susceptibility assays, we quantified the recovery of [(14)C]oritavancin from susceptibility assay plates with and without polysorbate 80 and examined the effect of the presence of polysorbate 80 on the oritavancin MICs for 301 clinical isolates from the genera Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus. In the absence of polysorbate 80, [(14)C]oritavancin was rapidly lost from solution in susceptibility assay test plates: 9% of the input drug was recovered in broth at 1 h when [(14)C]oritavancin was tested at 1 mug/ml. Furthermore, proportionately greater losses were observed at lower oritavancin concentrations, suggesting saturable binding of oritavancin to surfaces. The inclusion of 0.002% polysorbate 80 or 2% lysed horse blood permitted the recovery of 80 to 100% [(14)C]oritavancin at 24 h for all drug concentrations tested. Concordantly, oritavancin MIC(90)s for streptococcal isolates, as determined in medium containing 2% lysed horse blood, were identical with and without polysorbate 80. In stark contrast, polysorbate 80 reduced the oritavancin MIC(90)s by 16- to 32-fold for clinical isolates of enterococci and staphylococci, which are typically cultured without blood. The results presented here provide evidence that the MIC data for oritavancin in the current literature significantly underestimate the potency of oritavancin in vitro. Moreover, the combination of data from MIC and [(14)C]oritavancin recovery studies supports the revision of the oritavancin broth microdilution method to include polysorbate 80 throughout the assay.