Rapid viral diagnosis of acute respiratory infections: comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the immunofluorescence technique for detection of viral antigens in nasopharyngeal secretions

Agnostic Sequencing for Detection of Viral Pathogens

The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has expanded our ability to detect and analyze microbial genomes and has yielded novel molecular approaches for infectious disease diagnostics. While several targeted multiplex PCR and NGS-based assays have been widely used in public health settings in recent years, these targeted approaches are limited in that they still rely on a priori knowledge of a pathogen's genome, and an untargeted or unknown pathogen will not be detected. Recent public health crises have emphasized the need to prepare for a wide and rapid deployment of an agnostic diagnostic assay at the start of an outbreak to ensure an effective response to emerging viral pathogens. Metagenomic techniques can nonspecifically sequence all detectable nucleic acids in a sample and therefore do not rely on prior knowledge of a pathogen's genome. While this technology has been reviewed for bacterial diagnostics and adopted in research settings for the detection and characterization of viruses, viral metagenomics has yet to be widely deployed as a diagnostic tool in clinical laboratories. In this review, we highlight recent improvements to the performance of metagenomic viral sequencing, the current applications of metagenomic sequencing in clinical laboratories, as well as the challenges that impede the widespread adoption of this technology.

Estimated Burden of Community-Onset Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated Hospitalizations Among Children Aged <2 Years in the United States, 2014-15

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of hospitalizations in young children. We estimated the burden of community-onset RSV-associated hospitalizations among US children aged <2 years by extrapolating rates of RSV-confirmed hospitalizations in 4 surveillance states and using probabilistic multipliers to adjust for ascertainment biases.

METHODS

From October 2014 through April 2015, clinician-ordered RSV tests identified laboratory-confirmed RSV hospitalizations among children aged <2 years at 4 influenza hospitalization surveillance network sites. Surveillance populations were used to estimate age-specific rates of RSV-associated hospitalization, after adjusting for detection probabilities. We extrapolated these rates using US census data.

RESULTS

We identified 1554 RSV-associated hospitalizations in children aged <2 years. Of these, 27% were admitted to an intensive care unit, 6% needed mechanical ventilation, and 5 died. Most cases (1047/1554; 67%) had no underlying condition. Adjusted age-specific RSV hospitalization rates per 100 000 population were 1970 (95% confidence interval [CI],1787 to 2177), 897 (95% CI, 761 to 1073), 531 (95% CI, 459 to 624), and 358 (95% CI, 317 to 405) for ages 0-2, 3-5, 6-11, and 12-23 months, respectively. Extrapolating to the US population, an estimated 49 509-59 867 community-onset RSV-associated hospitalizations among children aged <2 years occurred during the 2014-2015 season.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the importance of RSV as a cause of hospitalization, especially among children aged <2 months. Our approach to estimating RSV-related hospitalizations could be used to provide a US baseline for assessing the impact of future interventions.

Antigenic Detection of Human Strain of Influenza Virus A (H3N2) in Swine Populations at Three Locations in Nigeria and Ghana during the Dry Early Months of 2014

Since the first detection of human H3N2 influenza virus in Taiwanese pigs in 1970, infection of pigs with wholly human viruses has been known to occur in other parts of the world. These viruses, referred to as human-like H3N2 viruses, have been known to cause clinical and subclinical infections of swine populations. Due to the paucity and complete unavailability of information on transmission of influenza viruses from other species, especially humans, to swine in Nigeria and Ghana, respectively, this study was designed to investigate the presence and prevalence of a human strain of influenza A (H3N2) in swine populations at three locations in two cities within these two West African countries in January and February, 2014. Using stratified random technique, nasal swab specimens were collected from seventy-five (75) pigs at two locations in Ibadan, Nigeria and from fifty (50) pigs in Kumasi, Ghana. These specimens were tested directly by a sensitive Quantitative Solid Phase Antigen-detection Sandwich ELISA using anti-A/Brisbane/10/2007 haemagglutinin monoclonal antibody. Influenza virus A/Brisbane/10/2007 (H3N2) was detected among pigs at the three study locations, with an aggregate prevalence of 4.0% for the two locations in Ibadan, Nigeria and also 4.0% for Kumasi, Ghana. Transmission of influenza viruses from other species to swine portends serious sinister prospects for genetic reassortment and evolvement of novel viruses. We therefore recommend that further studies should be carried out to investigate the presence of other circulating human and avian influenza viruses in swine populations in West Africa and also determine the extent of genetic reassortment of strains circulating among these pigs. This would provide an early warning system for detection of novel influenza viruses, which could have pandemic potentials.

The changing face of pediatric respiratory tract infections: how human metapneumovirus and human bocavirus fit into the overall etiology of respiratory tract infections in young children

Lower respiratory tract infections are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. Recent technological advances in the field of molecular biology have allowed virologists to detect many previously undetected viral pathogens. Two of these, human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and human bocavirus (HBoV), are of particular clinical interest to pediatric health care providers. This review discusses the most common viral respiratory infections in children, explores the role of newly discovered respiratory pathogens, and describes techniques for the diagnosis of viral respiratory infections.

[Seasonal flu]

La grippe saisonnière est due aux virus influenza A et B. Il s’agit de virus enveloppés dont le génome est constitué de sept à huit fragments d’ARN. Les différents sous-types sont déterminés par la nature des deux glycoprotéines de surface HA et NA. La grippe saisonnière est une maladie épidémique et hivernale dans les zones à climat tempéré. Son épidémiologie est liée à la grande variabilité du virus au cours du temps, nécessitant la mise en place d’un système d’alerte détectant chaque année les variants circulants dominant et déterminant la composition vaccinale. Les symptômes cliniques de la grippe ne sont pas suffisamment spécifiques pour permettre le diagnostic sans examen virologique. Cela est particulièrement vrai en période non épidémique, chez les sujets de plus de 65 ans et chez les enfants de moins de cinq ans. L’enfant représente une cible privilégiée des infections à virus influenza. Le recours à l’hospitalisation est d’autant plus élevé que l’enfant est jeune. Chez le nourrisson, l’infection peut être paucisymptomatique et s’accompagner de manifestations non respiratoires (léthargie, convulsions, malaises). Le diagnostic virologique de la grippe est justifié chez tous les sujets hospitalisés pour un syndrome respiratoire compatible avec une infection à virus influenza. Il existe plusieurs outils permettant une recherche directe du virus dans les sécrétions respiratoires : isolement du virus en culture, détection d’antigènes, détection moléculaire de l’ARN. Le choix de la méthode se fait selon les caractéristiques du test : sensibilité, spécificité, rapidité et simplicité de réalisation, coût.

Enzyme immunoassay for respiratory syncytial virus: rapid detection in nasopharyngeal secretions and evaluation of isolates representing different RSV subgroups

The presence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was investigated by immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) technique and by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 169 samples of nasopharyngeal secretions of infants and children with acute respiratory infections. Of 31 samples positive by EIA, 25 were positive by IFA. In 24 samples from a retrospective study, RSV positive by IFA and/or tissue culture isolation (TCI), 22 were also positive by EIA. The EIA was also evaluated with 111 RSV isolates in Hep2 cell cultures representing different RSV subgroups. All were positive by EIA.

Viral diagnosis by antigen detection techniques

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of viral infections can be obtained in the early stages of a disease by detection of viral antigens directly in the clinical specimen. This has become an important tool for rapid virus diagnosis.

METHODS

Antigens produced during virus infections can be detected either in cells collected from the site of infection by immunohistological investigation or in secretions and blood by solid phase immunoassays (IA). Viruses causing acute respiratory infections can be diagnosed in cells from the respiratory tract, viruses causing vesicular eruptions in epithelial cells from skin scrapings, rabies virus in nerve cells of the brain or epithelial cells from skin and cornea and cytomegalovirus (CMV) matrix antigen, pp65, can be detected in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) by immunofluorescence (IF) or immunoperoxidase techniques. The quality of specimens can be easily checked during the reading of results. Some IAs for antigen detection, such as detection of HBsAg and HIV p24 antigen in blood are standardized and sensitive. Others give less sensitive results because of the variation of quality of the clinical specimen. The latex agglutination tests are mainly used for rapid detection of virus or viral antigens in faeces: rota-and adenoviruses; the method may not be very sensitive but yields a result within a few minutes. Assays detecting viral nucleic acids are more sensitive than antigen detection tests because of a tremendous amplification of gene segments obtained by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). So far such assays are time consuming and expensive and are mainly used in specific clinical situations.

RESULTS

After introduction of specific monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), the antigen detection techniques are increasingly used. the need for quality control, trained staff, and standardized reagents and methods for specimen collection and preparation is now being appreciated. IF for viral respiratory viruses is used for diagnosis and epidemiological studies all over the world. Likewise, IF is still the method most often used for rabies diagnosis. For CMV, the pp65 matrix antigen is shown to be a sensitive marker closely correlated with clinical symptoms. Its detection by the IF technique has proven to be superior to other techniques for prediction of CMV pneumonia in bone marrow transplant patients. IAs are currently used in fully automated systems for large scale diagnosis based on antigen detection in serum specimens. Increase of antibody specificity on the solid phase by use of Mabs directed against the most abundant viral antigen in the clinical specimen shortens the reaction time; this has been employed in most of the constantly appearing new rapid diagnosis kits based on the immunoassay principle.

CONCLUSION

Although, in virology, more sensitive results are obtained by the gene detection method, PCR, directly in clinical samples, viral antigen detection tests are, after the introduction of Mabs for diagnostic purposes, increasingly used because of their low demand on laboratory equipment, their rapid and early result and relatively low cost. Antigen detection is successfully used directly in clinical specimens for rapid diagnosis of many viral infections as well as for identification of tissue culture isolated viruses. With Mab-based IAs the reaction time is shortened and new rapid, almost 'instant test' kits are appearing on the market.

Comparison of monoclonal biotin-avidin enzyme immunoassay and monoclonal time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay in detection of respiratory virus antigens

Background: Detection of respiratory viruses by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay based on monoclonal antibodies were developed in our laboratories in the late 1980s and they have been successfully used in daily diagnosis for more than seven years. Later, similar Biotin-EIAs were developed but the sensitivities were unsatisfactory.

Objectives: Further optimization of monoclonal Biotin-EIAs and comparison of the optimized assays with TR-FIAs.

Study design: Variations in test format, diluents, incubation times and temperatures, and different monoclonal antibodies were tested, and the final comparisons were made with TR-FIA using stored nasopharyngeal aspirates.

Results: The improvements in Biotin-EIA featured four changes which increased sensitivity in the assay: (a) test diluent contained diethylenetriamino-pentaacetic acid; (b) antigen and biotinylated detector antibody were added simultaneously; (c) reaction time was extended from 1 h at 37°C to overnight at 4°C; (d) from the thirteen monoclonal antibodies used in TR-FIA, ten were optimal also in Biotin-EIA, but in the parainfluenza 1 and 2 assays other monoclonals proved more sensitive. Out of 257 originally positive specimens tested in the comparison studies, 192 (74.7%) were again positive and 54 (21.0%) were negative in both assays; nine were negative in TR-FIA but positive in Biotin-EIA, while two specimens were negative in Biotin-EIA but positive in TR-FIA. The overall agreement between the two assays was 95.7%.

Conclusions: All monoclonal Biotin-EIAs can be optimized to the same sensitivity as TR-FIAs for the detection of respiratory viruses.

Laboratories which have no TR-FIA expertise may use Biotin-EIA in the diagnosis of acute respiratory infections.

Advances in the diagnosis of respiratory virus infections

Background: Advances have been made in selecting sensitive cell lines for isolation, in early detection of respiratory virus growth in cells by rapid culture assays, in production of monoclonal antibodies to improve many tests such as immunofluorescence detection of virus antigens in nasopharyngeal aspirates, in highly sensitive antigen detections by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassays (TR-FIAs) and biotin-enzyme immunoassays (BIOTH-E), and, finally, in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of respiratory virus DNA or RNA in clinical specimens. All of these advances have contributed to new or improved possibilities for the diagnosis of respiratory virus infections.

Objectives and study design: This review summarizes our experiences during the last 15 years in the development of diagnostic tests for respiratory virus infections, and in use of these tests in daily diagnostic work and in epidemiological studies.

Results: Immunofluorescence tests based on monoclonal antibodies, all-monoclonal TR-FIAs, and biotin-enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have about the same sensitivities and specificities. They compare well with the sensitivity of virus culture. PCR followed by liquid-phase hybridization is a sensitive method for detecting adenovirus DNA and enterovirus and rhinovirus RNA in clinical specimens. IgG EIA on paired acute and convalescent phase sera is the most sensitive serological test for respiratory virus infections and is a valuable reference method when evaluating the sensitivity of new diagnostic tests. The IgG avidity test can distinguish primary infections from re-infections at least in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections. IgM antibody assays, on the other hand, had low sensitivities in our studies.

Conclusions: The choice of diagnostic methods for respiratory virus infections depends on the type and location of the laboratory, the number of specimens tested, and the previous experience of the laboratory. Virus culture, whenever possible, should be the basic diagnostic method; the results, including identification of the virus, should be available no more than 24 h later than the results of rapid diagnostic tests. In small laboratories, especially in hospitals where specimen transportation is well organized, immunofluorescence may be the best choice for antigen detection with the provision that an experienced microscopist and a good UV microscope are available. If the laboratory receives a large number of specimens and has previous experience with EIAs, then biotin-EIAs or TR-FIAs may be the most practical techniques. Their advantages include the stability of the antigens in clinical samples since intact, exfoliated epithelial cells are not required, treatment of specimens is practical, testing of large numbers of specimens is possible, and reading the printed test result is less subjective than reading fluorescence microscopy. The larger role of PCR in the diagnosis of respiratory virus infections depends on future developments such as practical methods to extract DNA or RNA and to purify the extracts from nonspecific inhibitors, plus further improvements to minimize cross-contamination. Group-specific detection of enteroviruses and rhinoviruses is an example of the potential for PCR technology. In experienced laboratories. EIA IgG antibody tests should be available. Recombinant antigens may be a useful part of such assays.

Monoclonal antibodies for the rapid diagnosis of influenza-B virus infections by ELISA: production and characterization

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies directed against conserved epitopes of viral proteins have substantially improved the accuracy of several immunochemical methods in diagnostic virology.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against structural protein antigens of influenza-B virus and evaluate their use as diagnostic reagents for the direct detection of such antigens in clinical specimens from patients with respiratory infections of unknown aetiology.

STUDY DESIGN

(a) Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against influenza-B viral antigens, and (b) their use in two different ELISA systems for detecting influenza-B antigen either directly in clinical specimens or after confirmation by rapid culture in MDCK cells.

RESULTS

Four monoclonal antibodies were selected for their specificity for the nucleoprotein antigen as demonstrated by Western blot analysis. The specificity of these antibodies for different epitopes of the nucleoprotein was demonstrated by competition experiments, using unlabelled and biotin-labelled purified antibodies in a sandwich assay. All four antibodies belong to the mouse IgG(2a) isotype, lack haemagglutination inhibition and neutralization properties and exhibit titres as high as 10(-6) in ELISA with as little as 30 ng purified influenza-B virus. ELISA methods using these antibodies detected only influenza-B viral antigens in direct testing of clinical specimens from patients with known influenza-B or influenza-A infections, or after reisolating virus from such specimens in tissue culture of MDCK cells.

CONCLUSION

The antibodies were suitable for the direct detection and typing of influenza-B virus in clinical specimens or for use in rapid confirmation cultures.

The impact of adenovirus infection on the immunocompromised host

Adenovirus (Ad) infections in immunocompromised hosts have increased in frequency as the number of patients with transplants of bone marrow, liver, kidney, heart and other organs increase in number and survive longer. The numbers of such patients have also increased because of the emergence of the HIV epidemic. Ad infections with the 51 different serotypes recognised to date have few pathognomonic signs and symptoms, and thus require a variety of laboratory-based procedures to confirm infection. These viruses have the ability to target various organs with relative serotype specificity and can cause diverse manifestations including serious life-threatening diseases characteristic of the organs involved. Ads have cytolytic and immunoregulatory properties. The clinical dilemma remains the prompt recognition of Ad-related disease, the differentiation of Ad infection from Ad disease and the differentiation from other causative agents. Since the armamentarium of effective antiviral agents available to treat Ads is unproven by controlled trials and the virus is often not acquired de novo, it is difficult to prevent reactivation in immunodeficient hosts or new acquisition from donor organs. Timely discontinuation of immunosuppressive agents is necessary to prevent morbid outcomes. The clinical diseases, diagnostic tests, antiviral agents and biological aspects of the Ads as pathogens in immunocompromised patients are discussed in the context of this review. Some of the newer diagnostic tests are based on the well-studied molecular biology of Ads, which also have been attenuated by selective viral DNA deletions for use as vectors in numerous gene therapy trials in humans.

Evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (directigen flu A+B) for simultaneous and differential detection of influenza a and B virus antigens from respiratory samples

We report a prospective evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the direct, rapid, qualitative, simultaneous, and differential detection of the influenza A (IA) and B (IB) virus antigen in different respiratory samples. The EIA method was compared with the shell vial culture system (MDCK cell line) used with the same samples. We studied 160 samples from 93 (58.1%) pediatric patients (hospital emergency room) and from 67 (41.9%) adult patients (sentinel network). Seventy-four(46.2%) samples were considered positive; of them, 46 (62.2%) were from pediatric patients and 28 (37.8%) were from an adult group (P < 0.05), with overall positive values of 49.9% and 41.7%, respectively. All 74 (100%) of the positive samples were isolated in cell culture versus the 68.9% that were detected as positive by the new EIA method (P < 0.05). Of the 41 samples positive for the IA virus, the EIA detected 34 (82.9%) positive samples; of the 33 samples positive for the IB virus, the EIA detected 17 (51.5%) positive samples (P < 0.05). No false-positive reaction was detected with the EIA method (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%). The overall results obtained in the comparison between the new EIA and the shell vial culture had a sensibility of 82.9% and predictive negative values of 92.4% for the IA virus and 51.5% and 84.3%, respectively, for the IB virus. This evaluation shows sensitivity and specificity percentages for the new EIA method that is acceptable for routine use in IA virus detection. The results obtained were worse for IB virus detection, but this new EIA method is actually the only one with the capacity to differentiate between the two influenza viruses.

Comparison of 44/107L one-step immunocapture enzyme-immunoassay and time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for influenza A diagnosis

One-step immunocapture enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) was compared with time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TR-FIA) for rapid diagnosis of influenza A infection by antigen detection. The high-affinity monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) recognising two independent epitopes on the conservative nucleoprotein were used for capture (MAb 44) and detection (MAb 107L) of antigen by both assays. The detection limit for purified recombinant influenza A virus nucleoprotein was approximately 10 pg by EIA and 5 pg by TR-FIA. The performance of the methods was evaluated by testing 43 known positive and 50 negative clinical specimens (nasopharyngeal washes and aspirates). The sensitivity and specificity was 93% and 92% for EIA and 100% and 98% for TR-FIA, respectively, in comparison to the reference A3/A1 TR-FIA. The relationship of 44/107L immunoassays has been evaluated: in comparison to 44/107L TR-FIA (100%), EIA confirmed 93% of positive and 94% of negative samples. In conclusion, the capture-detector pair of MAbs 44 and 107L can be used for the sensitive detection of influenza A viral antigen in clinical samples by both immunocapture methods. Despite the slightly lower accuracy of the EIA, widespread availability and economy of the EIA methodology makes it an advantageous alternative for the laboratory diagnosis of influenza A virus infections.

Comparison of three non-nested RT-PCR for the detection of influenza A viruses

BACKGROUND

The viral isolation technique (VIT) is largely used as a gold standard for the detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory samples. Some recent studies have pointed out that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays allow sensitive and rapid detection of influenza viruses, also providing excellent correlation with traditional methods.

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN STUDY

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of three non-nested PCR, two PCR-hybridization assays using primers defined in M and NS genes, and one PCR which uses primers defined in NP, NS and HA genes and combines the detection of H3N2 and H1N1 hemagglutinin genes using defined primers in NP, NS and HA genes (PCR3), in comparison with an IF assay (IFA) and viral isolation technique (VIT). The study was carried out on 244 nasal samples collected mainly by practitioners of the GROG surveillance network during winter 1998-1999 for the detection of influenza A virus.

RESULTS

Overall influenza viruses were detected more frequently by PCR techniques in 157 (64.3%), 147 (60.2%), 110 (45%) cases for PCR1, PCR2, PCR3, respectively, than by VIT or IFA, in 100 (40.9%) and 74 (30.3%) cases, respectively. Taking the positive culture samples as a reference, 100 (41.8%) samples were found to be positive for influenza A, and the sensitivity of IFA, PCR 1, PCR 2 and PCR3 techniques were 70, 100, 99, and 90%, respectively as compared with viral isolation cultures. On the other hand, as 86.5% of positive samples were positive with at least two different techniques, the sensitivity, specificity, VPP and VPN of each technique were recalculated taking into account a further criterion defining a positive sample: positivity with two techniques. We observe that techniques PCR 2 and particularly PCR 1 have very good sensitivity, respectively 98.6 and 100%, far better than the traditional techniques, IFA and culture, whilst maintaining acceptable specificity: 94.1 and 86.1%, respectively. In both cases they enable 141 (57.7%) A-positive influenza samples to be detected instead of the 100 (40.9%) obtained when culture is the reference test. IFA, culture and PCR 3 are highly specific (VPP=100%), but in comparison with PCR 1 and 2 their sensitivity, respectively 51.7, 69. 9, 77.6%, and negative predictive value are unsatisfactory. PCR 1 and 2 are superior to the other techniques to a statistically highly significant degree in terms of sensitivity, but the difference between the two is not significant.

Survey on influenza laboratory diagnostic and surveillance methods in Europe. European Scientific Working Group on Influenza

The survey was undertaken by ESWI in order to investigate the comparability of the laboratory diagnostic methods and the influenza surveillance systems used in 24 European countries. The results indicate considerable consensus in the general approaches to collection and use of clinical specimens, rapid diagnostic techniques, virus isolation techniques in eggs or/and MDCK cell lines, virus identification and use of inhibition of hemagglutination (IHA) and complement fixation (CF) tests for serological diagnostics. However, the details of the techniques used are somewhat heterogeneous: antigen detection methods (immunofluorescence versus immuno adsorbent assay), isolation methods (eggs versus tissue culture), reagents (locally produced, WHO, commercial) are not always equivalent and results are therefore not really comparable. Some of these discrepancies are due to a lack of resources or a lack of priority for influenza in the country. The greatest differences between individual countries exist in the epidemiological part of surveillance programmes. The mode of collection of influenza related mortality and absentism from work varies considerably in different countries. These findings indicate the need to harmonize viral procedures and surveillance systems in European countries in order to improve validity and comparability of results and as a prerequisite for early information on influenza etiology and spread.

Diagnosis of respiratory tract viruses in 24 h by immunofluorescent staining of shell vial cultures containing Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells

Nine hundred and seventy-eight clinical specimens were examined taken from patients with respiratory tract viruses (RV)-like syndrome between November 1996 and July 1998. The study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of centrifuge-enhanced shell vial cultures (SVC) containing Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells, combined with immunofluorescent (IF) staining in 24 h. This technique rapidly detects and identifies respiratory tract viruses. The conventional tube culture system with multiple cell lines would ordinarily detect RV within 3-30 days. The SVC/IF method using single cell line (MDCK cells) allowed detection of 81.5% of influenza A virus, 72% of parainfluenza virus, 82.6% of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and 79.6% of adenovirus in 24 h.

Comparison of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK) with a green monkey continuous cell line (Vero) and human lung embryonated cells (MRC-5) in the isolation of influenza A virus from nasopharyngeal aspirates by shell vial culture

We report a comparative study of the MDCK, Vero, and MRC-5 cell lines in the isolation of the influenza A (IA) virus. We studied 746 samples in which 63 IA viruses were isolated. The MDCK line displayed 100% sensitivity, the Vero line displayed 71.4%, and the MRC-5 displayed 57.1%. The MDCK line showed a statistically significant difference with respect to the Vero line (P = 0.001) and the MRC-5 line (P = 0.001). The quantitative sensitivity analysis showed the MDCK line to be superior to the other lines. It seems that the MDCK line is still one of the most recommendable for the isolation of the IA virus from respiratory samples.

Influenza and influenza-like illness in general practice: drawing lessons for surveillance from a pilot study in Paris, France

BACKGROUND

There are two types of inflenza surveillance techniques: qualitative laboratory-based surveillance and quantitative medical practice-based surveillance. The former is of great importance in isolating new strains of the virus, which helps in the decision-making process concerning the composition of the vaccine, and the latter provides estimates of morbidity, mortality or economic impact as a result of infection from the influenza virus. Rapid methods such as immunoflourescence (IF) or immunocapture assays (ICA) are now available for diagnosis of influenza infections. However, little is known about the use of these methods for influenza surveillance purposes.

AIMS

To evaluate the feasibility of a rapid influenza diagnosis in ambulatory conditions, and to investigate the therapeutical outcomes of patients suffering from influenza-like illness (ILI) in relation to the virological diagnoses.

METHOD

During the 1994-1995 influenza season, 130 patients presenting with ILI symptoms (< 36 hours) to 33 general practitioners (GPs) were included in a prospective study. Two nasal swabs and one throat swab per patient were collected and sent to the laboratory within 12 hours. Information concerning therapeutical outcomes was recorded during examination. Specimens were analysed using the immunofluorescence (IF) method and antigen immunocapture assay (ICA).

RESULTS

Sixteen influenza A (12%) and 19 influenza B (15%) infections were diagnosed. The overall rate of influenza positive specimens was 17% in the pre-epidemic period and 31% during the epidemic (P = 0.1). The rates of usable specimens for IF assay, nasal ICA and throat ICA were 46%, 100% and 99% respectively. The combination of these three collections ensured a highly sensitive influenza virological diagnosis. There were no differences in therapeutical outcomes between the influenza positive and negative cases. The GPs prescribed antibiotics in 60% of the cases for a mean duration of 7 days (+/- 1.2). The mean duration of sick leave was 3.4 days (+/- 1.6). Twelve patients (four influenza positive, eight influenza negative) had been vaccinated at the beginning of the winter. The practitioner's intuition concerning 'which patient should be tested for influenza virus' did not prove useful in improving the aptness of virological diagnoses in the field of influenza surveillance.

CONCLUSION

The only way to estimate the true impact of influenza is to carry out a systematic virological sampling based on a sensitive clinical definition and using sensitive laboratory methods.

Evaluation of a direct immunofluorescence assay, dot-blot enzyme immunoassay, and shell vial culture in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections caused by influenza A virus

We prospectively evaluated the efficacy of two commercial rapid methods for antigenic detection, a dot-blot enzyme immunoassay (EIA-DB) (Directigen FluA, Becton-Dickinson, USA) and a direct immunofluorescence assay (DIF) (Monofluokit Influenza A, Diagnostics Pasteur, France), compared with the shell-vial culture in the MDCK line, incubated 2 to 3 days and stained with the monoclonal antibody clone IA-52, the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract caused by Influenza A virus (IA). In the study period the presence of IA virus was detected in 59 of the 377 samples analyzed (15.7%). Only the SVC method detected all positive samples (100% sensitivity), being used as a reference method for comparison with the other techniques). The EIA-DB technique detected 50 cases (84.7%) and the DIF only 35 (59.3%). In nine (15.2%) cases the diagnosis was obtained only with the SVC method. The results of the comparison of the EIA-DB technique with SVC were: sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 97.2%. The DIF technique gave values of 59.3%, 100%, 100%, and 92.9%, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between the sensitivity of the EIA-DB and the DIF method (p = 0.0001). In view of the results we recommended the use of the EIA-DB as a screening method when infection by the IA is suspected. But to obtain the maximum diagnostic yield all samples would be inoculated in a shell vial culture with the MDCK cell line.

Monoclonal antibodies for the direct detection of influenza-A virus by ELISA in clinical specimens from patients with respiratory infections

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibody technology provides antibody reagents of known specificity, high titres and unlimited availability, that form ideal reference antibodies for use in specific viral antigen-detection methods.

OBJECTIVES

To produce mouse monoclonal antibodies against antigenic sites of influenza-A virus, and evaluate their use as diagnostic reagents in a sandwich ELISA.

STUDY DESIGN

(1) Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against influenza-A virus; (2) application of these antibodies in an ELISA method for direct antigen detection; and (3) evaluation of the ELISA as routine procedure.

RESULTS

Four monoclonal antibodies (A1-A4) from mice immunized intranasally with influenza-A virus were selected according to their specific reactivity with either nucleoprotein or matrix protein antigens as demonstrated by Western blot analysis. These antibodies lacked haemagglutination inhibition and neutralization properties and recognized both H1N1 and H3N2 strains of influenza-A virus equally. A sandwich ELISA using unlabelled antibodies for antigen capture and biotin-labelled antibodies for antigen detection was used to analyse nasopharyngeal secretions or nasal swabs from culture-confirmed influenza-A-infected patients and comparable specimens from patients with other viral respiratory infections. Only influenza-A virus (strains H1N1 and H3N2) could be detected in samples from patients with known influenza-A and influenza-B infections, and also after re-isolation of such viruses in conventional cultures of MDCK cells or embryonated hens' eggs. The antigen-detection assay showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.3% compared with conventional culture methods.

CONCLUSION

The reported ELISA appears to be a rapid and inexpensive method for diagnosis and epidemiological studies of influenza-A infections.

Viral pathogens and clinical manifestations associated with acute lower respiratory tract infections in children of the Sudan

BACKGROUND

Incomplete knowledge regarding the viral agents causing respiratory infections in children living in developing countries impedes diagnosis and management of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the role of viral pathogens in Sudanese children presenting with acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRI).

STUDY DESIGN

The study population consisted of patients presenting with ALRI at the Children's Emergency Hospital in Khartoum during 2 periods (December 1987 to April 1988 and September 1990 to March 1991). Identification of viral infections was based an antigen detection by immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on nasopharyngeal secretions and/or serology.

RESULTS

After exclusion of children with measles, 102 and 111 children, respectively, were prospectively enrolled in the study during the 2 periods. Their ages ranged between one mouth and 14 years (mean 2.0 years). Radiologic pulmonary infiltrations were detected in 135 (66%) of the 206 patients who had chest radiographs, whereas 7 (3%) showed lobar pneumonia. The case fatality rate was 2.3%. Of 83 virus infections detected, 79 were in children < years and consisted mainly of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV, 28%), followed by parainfluenza (7%), adenovirus (5%) and influenza A (2%). Infiltrates on radiographs were significantly less often found in virus-infected cases than in ALRI-cases with negative virus tests.

CONCLUSIONS

RSV predominantly infected young infants (</= 3 months) compared with those who were 5 years or older (28% and 13%, respectively). A tendency for respiratory viruses to be more prevalent was seen during the cooler months (January and February). There were no significant differences in clinical features between virus-positive cases and others. The panorama of viral infections proved to be the same as in other developing countries.

Antigen detection in human respiratory Coronavirus infections by monoclonal time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of respiratory infections by detecting viral antigens has received considerable attention using immunofluorescent assays (IFA) and enzyme immunoassays (EIA). Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TR-FIA) has been developed for several viruses.

OBJECTIVES

To prepare monoclonal antibodies to coronavirus strains, to incorporate them into a TR-FIA, and test the assay on clinical specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

Monoclonal antibodies were prepared to the N nucleoprotein of the two human respiratory coronaviruses, HCV strains 229E and OC43. Monoclonals to both viruses were completely type-specific; they did not cross-react between themselves or with multiple strains of other respiratory viruses. These antibodies were configured into optimized EIA and TR-FIA tests. The all-monoclonal tests were then compared to polyclonal EIA tests in terms of their ability to detect virus in clinical specimens.

RESULTS

The all-monoclonal TR-FIA was uniformly the most sensitive, detecting virus in all 13 229E-positive specimens compared to 69% for the monoclonal EIA and 54% for the polyclonal EIA test. Similar results were obtained for 10 OC43-positive specimens: 100% in TR-FIA, 90% in monoclonal EIA, and 80% in polyclonal EIA. For 229E in TR-FIA, mean positive/negative (P/N) ratios were 143 for 229E-positive human embryonic lung fibroblast (HLF) cell culture fluids and 10 for positive nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens; for OC43 in TR-FIA, mean P/N values were 964 for OC43-positive rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cell culture fluids and 174 for positive NPA specimens. The sensitivities of the TR-FIA were determined with purified virions to be 0.308 ng virus per well for HCV-229E and 0.098 ng virus per well for HCV-OC43.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid and sensitive test appears to be much more sensitive than traditional antigen detection assays but will require more extensive field testing on clinical specimens.

Subgrouping of respiratory syncytial virus strains from Australia and Papua New Guinea by biological and antigenic characteristics

Strains of respiratory syncytial virus from 3 major areas of Australia and Papua New Guinea (PNG) were analyzed for variations in their antigenic and biological properties and in the molecular weights of their major structural proteins. Seventy-eight strains from infants and young children with LRI were collected from 1981-1984. The RSV season in the Australian cities lasted from April through September, with major peaks in July of each year, while the RSV season in tropical PNG was year-round, with small peaks in March and October of each year coinciding with excessive rainfall. Fifty-six strains were analyzed in detail; 40 were typed by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay with monoclonal antibodies as group A strains and 16 were group B; both groups were concurrent. Three children of one family had sequential RSV infections 13 months apart, and the etiologic group A strain was identical both years in terms of growth and antigenic properties with strain-specific ferret antisera; the second infection was milder in all three children. On average, the group A strains replicated considerably better than group B strains in HEp2 cells, producing 53% more syncytia and 99% higher infectious virus titers in 31% less time in culture. Ten group A and B reference strains exhibited the same growth patterns as the A and B regional strains, respectively. Differences in antigenicity as measured with hyperimmune antisera to prototype Long strain were even greater. Group A strains exhibited a mean 68% greater IFA staining than B strains, a 71% greater EIA reaction, and were neutralized to 69% higher serum titers than B strains. Again, the reference A and B strains included as controls gave patterns identical to those of the regional strains. Finally, the P phosphoprotein had consistently higher molecular weight in A strains (mean 35,900) than B strains (mean 33,100). Small variations in the sizes of the F and G glycoproteins were not sufficient to suggest grouping on this basis.

Comparison of rapid detection methods for influenza A virus and their value in health-care management of institutionalized geriatric patients

Respiratory specimens from 160 geriatric patients with suspected influenza illness were used to evaluate the abilities of two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs; Directigen FLU-A [Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.] and Prima EIA [Baxter/Bartels Diagnostics, Inc., Issaquah, Wash.]) and direct immunofluorescence testing (immunofluorescence assay [IFA]) to identify influenza A virus. In comparison with culture isolation, the sensitivities and specificities of the IFA, Directigen FLU-A, and Prima EIA were 92.5 and 97.2%, 86.8 and 99.1%, and 92.5 and 98.1%, respectively. In contrast to EIA, IFA was labor intensive and required a high degree of technical expertise, and the results of IFA were difficult to interpret. These factors may preclude the use of IFA for testing large numbers of specimens. A retrospective epidemiologic survey of influenza infection was done in six geriatric institutions which had used either rapid and culture testing or culture alone. Preventable cases of influenza A virus infection ranged from 9 to 38% of all cases in facilities which used culture testing only and which had not instituted amantadine prophylaxis. The use of direct specimen testing is recommended as an adjunct to culture isolation for the identification of influenza A virus. Use of a combination of these methods permits the timely administration of appropriate antiviral therapy and infection control measures, while it also permits the antigenic surveillance of circulating influenza strains, which is necessary for present vaccine efficacy evaluations and the creation of future effective vaccine formulations.

ELISA method for detection of influenza A infection in swine

An antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to monitor virus shedding associated with experimental infection with a field strain of swine influenza in pigs. The assay consisted of a monoclonal anti-nucleoprotein capture antibody and a biotinylated rabbit anti-influenza A (H1N1) sandwich antibody. The antigen-capture system was capable of detecting as little as 1 ng/ml purified virus. The ELISA system surpassed egg cultivation procedures in the detection of low levels of shedding virus. Egg cultivation procedures indicated that most viral shedding had ceased by day 10 postinfection. In contrast, antigen-capture ELISA still showed an ongoing presence of viral antigen. A virus-capture ELISA, using this capture-sandwich antibody system, is equivalent in sensitivity to conventional egg inoculation procedures for the detection of the early phases of virus shedding. The automative potential of an ELISA-based system coupled with a substantially reduced assay time requirement give this virus-capture ELISA a distinct advantage over other cell culture or egg-based diagnostic techniques.

Comparison of rapid diagnostic techniques for respiratory syncytial and influenza A virus respiratory infections in young children

We performed virus isolation tests for respiratory viruses on combined nasal wash-throat swab specimens collected from infants and children with acute respiratory illnesses presenting to a hospital clinic during a 3-month period of concurrent epidemics of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A virus (Flu A) infections. Virus isolation results were used to assess the utility of commercially available rapid diagnostic kits for these two viruses. The kits employed direct immunofluorescence (IF) of cells (Imagen for RSV and Flu A), indirect IF of cells (Baxter Bartels Microscan), and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Becton Dickinson Directigen for RSV and Flu A and Abbott TestPack for RSV). All testing was completed on 81 specimens from 80 subjects. Of the 81 specimens, 53 (65%) yielded a virus: RSV, 28%; Flu A, 25%; rhinovirus, 6%; and enterovirus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and adenovirus, 2 to 4% each. Among the tests, Bartels Microscan and Directigen Flu-A exhibited the highest sensitivities (87 and 75%) and efficiencies (94 and 94%) for RSV and Flu A, respectively. All the tests exhibited high specificity. Thus, optimal detection of RSV and Flu A among infants and children who presented to a hospital clinic required two different detection methods (IF and enzyme immunoassay) and kits from two different companies (Baxter [Bartels Microscan] and Becton Dickinson [Directigen]).

Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassays with monoclonal antibodies for rapid identification of parainfluenza type 4 and mumps viruses

Monoclonal antibodies were prepared to the F and M proteins of parainfluenza 4A and 4B and to mumpsvirus to obtain reagents that could be configured into type-specific yet broadly-reactive IFA, EIA, and TR-FIA tests. Several antibodies to parainfluenza 4A also detected subtype 4B, although to a somewhat lower signal, and thus were well suited to generic parainfluenza type 4 tests that were comparable to similar tests previously described for parainfluenza types 1, 2, and 3. Monoclonals to subtype 4B were less able to detect 4A because of high background problems in one or another test. Monoclonals to mumpsvirus F protein were completely type-specific. These antibodies were screened by IFA and EIA for broad reactivity with diverse strains of each virus and were configured into optimized EIA and TR-FIA tests. The all-monoclonal tests were then compared to polyclonal tests in terms of their ability to detect virus in clinical specimens. The all-monoclonal TR-FIA was uniformly the most sensitive, detecting virus in 80% of culture-positive parainfluenza 4A specimens, 67% of parainfluenza 4B specimens, and 90% of mumps specimens, compared to 40-67% for the monoclonal EIA tests and 33-60% for the polyclonal EIA tests. For parainfluenza 4 TR-FIA, mean P/N values were 379 for subtype 4A cell culture fluids (228 for subtype 4B cultures) and 57 for 4A clinical specimens (43 for 4B specimens). For mumpsvirus TR-FIA, mean P/N values were 27 for culture fluids and 32 for clinical specimens. The sensitivities of the TR-FIA were determined with purified virus to be 0.28 ng virus per well for parainfluenza 4A and 0.70 ng virus per well for mumpsvirus.

Stability of respiratory syncytial virus antigen due to buffer treatment for direct detection in nasopharyngeal specimens with enzyme immunoassay

We developed an enzyme immunoassay (direct EIA; Enzygnost RSV[Ag]) for the direct detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antigen in nasopharyngeal specimens (NPS). The test procedure is the same as our recently described direct EIA for detection of influenza A and B virus antigens in NPS. For practical purposes it is of advantage to differentiate respiratory viruses on the same microtitration plate in the same run. The test shows no limitations by sample consistency, and results are obtained within 4 hr. In contrast to other test systems, sonification is not necessary. This is due to the sample buffer STD. We studied the influence of sample buffer STD on the stability of RSV (strain Long) antigen at different temperatures over a period of 7 days. PBS-BSA-buffer served as control. The treatment and storage of RSV (strain Long) with sample buffer STD at room temperature or at 4 degrees C showed no decrease of antigen detectability. The antigen is very stable in contrast to the storage of RSV (strain Long) in PBS-BSA buffer during the observation period of 7 days. Consequently, when NPS are stored in sample buffer STD, results of direct EIA are independent from the time of transport and temperature within 7 days. Thirty-eight NPS from infants with confirmed RSV infection were investigated. Confirmation was performed by virus isolation (n = 29) or with commercially available enzyme immunoassays or immunofluorescence test (n = 9). The direct EIA showed a specificity of 99.3% (n = 140) and a sensitivity of 95% (n = 38).

A comparison of commercially available monoclonal antibodies for direct and indirect immunofluorescence culture confirmation and direct detection of parainfluenza viruses

Two commercially available immunofluorescence monoclonal antibody (MAB) reagents (Bartels, Baxter Healthcare, Issaquah, WA; and Symex, Broken Arrow, OK) were evaluated as a means for detecting parainfluenza virus (PIV) both in shell-vial cultures and directly in clinical specimens. Bartels reagents are used in an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) format and exist as MABs reactive with all three PIV serotypes, individually and in a pool. Symex reagents, also available individually and in a trivalent pool, are used in a direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) format. Among a total of 299 respiratory specimens, 24 yielded PIV. In a shell-vial culture confirmation test, both the individual and pooled monoclonal antibody reagents from both Bartels and Symex detected all 24 PIV isolates. There were three apparent false-positive results with the Bartels pooled IFA reagents. Of the 299 specimens, 160 were also tested directly for the presence of PIV. There were 13 positive specimens among these 160. The Bartels and Symex monoclonal antibody reagents detected similar percentages of positive samples when used for direct detection (that is, 78.6-85.7). No false-positive results were obtained with any of the reagents in the direct-detection format.

A nylon membrane enzyme immunoassay for rapid diagnosis of influenza A infection

A new membrane-enzyme immunofiltration assay (MIFA) was developed for rapid diagnosis of influenza A infection. The pretreated specimens were dispensed into a 1.2 micron Biodyne B nylon membrane-bottomed microplate and vacuum filtration was applied. Blocking solution, peroxidase-conjugated anti-influenza A nucleoprotein monoclonal antibody, washing buffer and substrate were added in that order. The assay was completed within 30 min. Out of 103 nasopharyngeal swabs collected in transport medium, 31 isolates of influenza A virus were obtained and 22 specimens were detected directly by the MIFA technique. The 9 isolation-positive MIFA-negative specimens required 6 days or more for viral detection in cell culture, and probably contained a very low quantity of virus. The 72 cell culture negative specimens were also negative by MIFA. Comparison with a classical immunocapture assay (ICA) gave a better sensitivity for MIFA, as only 15/103 specimens were positive by ICA. MIFA is a rapid test with 71% sensitivity and 100% specificity. It was also very useful to test the cell culture supernatants, as a sensitivity of 100% was obtained with MIFA when the immunofluorescence technique was positive. The same technique could be readily carried out on the same plate for other respiratory viruses since capture antibody is not used.

Application of Directigen FLU-A for the detection of influenza A virus in human and nonhuman specimens

Directigen FLU-A, a new enzyme immunoassay membrane test, rapidly detects influenza A virus antigen in specimens from patients. Nasopharyngeal washes and pharyngeal gargles were used to determine the effectiveness of the assay as applied to different types of routinely collected clinical samples. All specimens had been previously shown to contain influenza A virus by virus isolation in tissue culture. Directigen FLU-A was 90% sensitive (95% confidence interval, 56 to 99.7%) with nasopharyngeal washes but only 39% sensitive (95% confidence interval, 17 to 64%) with pharyngeal gargles (P = 0.018) when used with samples containing similar amounts of infectious virus (50% tissue culture infective dose, 1.0 to 4.5). The intensity of the positive reaction with Directigen FLU-A did not correlate with the amount of virus in the specimens. Directigen FLU-A was found to detect cell-associated antigen more readily than free virus; only 20 infected cells were required to identify cell-associated influenza A virus antigen, whereas the limit of detection for free virus was 1.63 x 10(3) infectious virus particles. These findings suggest that Directigen FLU-A detects the cell-associated antigen present in clinical specimens rather than free virus. In addition, Directigen FLU-A detected avian and swine influenza A viruses in both cloacal swabs (75% sensitivity) and swine lung homogenates (86% sensitivity), indicating its potential usefulness in the surveillance of nonhuman influenza A viruses.

Direct detection of influenza virus antigen in nasopharyngeal specimens by direct enzyme immunoassay in comparison with quantitating virus shedding

We developed a direct enzyme immunoassay [EIA; Enzygnost Influenza A(Ag) and Enzygnost Influenza B(Ag)] for the direct detection of influenza A and B virus antigens in nasopharyngeal secretion specimens (NPS). The test is performed without sonification of specimens, and results are obtained within 4 h. A direct comparison between direct EIA and quantitation of virus shedding for influenza A and B virus antigen detection was carried out. A total of 210 NPS and 98 nasopharyngeal wash specimens (NPW) were investigated. We isolated influenza A viruses from 79 (37.6%) of 210 NPS; of these 79 cell-culture-positive NPS, 70 (88.6%) were also positive by direct EIA. Of 29 (13.8%) NPS from which influenza B virus was isolated, 24 (82.8%) NPS were positive by direct EIA. Virus shedding was determined quantitatively in 48 NPS from patients with influenza A and in 24 NPS from patients with influenza B. Only a crude correlation between optical density values and virus concentrations was observed. Detection of influenza virus antigens in NPS by direct EIA showed sensitivities of 89.7% for influenza A virus and 87.9% for influenza B virus and specificities of 99.3% for influenza A virus and 100% for influenza B virus. With direct EIA, all NPW were negative for influenza A virus, although virus was isolated from 21 (21.4%) NPW. Of 15 NPW from which influenza B virus was isolated, 7 showed positive results in direct EIA. In addition, direct EIA is suitable for detecting influenza A and B viruses in cell cultures before the appearance of any cytopathic effects and can be used as a cell culture confirmation test.

Rapid identification of respiratory syncytial virus infections by direct fluorescent antibody testing: reliability as a guide to patient cohorting

This study compared the results of a commercially available, direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test with viral culture in 880 specimens obtained from 690 patients by means of nasopharyngeal swabs. The two tests were congruent in 92.5% (814) of the specimens. The sensitivity of the DFA was 0.95, the specificity was 0.91, the positive predictive value was 0.82, and the negative predictive value was 0.98. Among 548 inpatients, there were 3 mixed infections (RSV and another virus), 8 RSV infections not identified by the DFA, and 35 positive DFA results not confirmed by cell culture. Use of the DFA test alone would have resulted in 502 (92%) correct patient-placement decisions. We conclude that the DFA test provides reliable evidence on which to base patient-placement decisions but that the error rate is too high to permit safe cohorting of high-risk patients, such as those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Comparison of two rapid methods for detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (Testpack RSV and ortho RSV ELISA) with direct immunofluorescence and virus isolation for the diagnosis of pediatric RSV infection

The ability of two commercial immunoassays to detect respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in respiratory specimens was evaluated as follows: 152 specimens were tested by TestPack RSV (Abbott), and 72 were tested by Ortho RSV ELISA (Ortho). Test outcomes were compared with those of virus isolation alone, direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) alone, or virus isolation and/or DFA. TestPack RSV versus virus isolation showed 91% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 93% positive predictive value (PPV), and 95% negative predictive value (NPV). TestPack RSV versus DFA showed 89% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 96% PPV, and 93% NPV. When TestPack RSV performance was compared with that of virus isolation and DFA, the sensitivity was 87% and the specificity was 100%. Ortho RSV ELISA versus virus isolation showed 88% sensitivity, 87% specificity, 79% PPV, and 93% NPV. Ortho RSV ELISA versus DFA showed 91% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 81% PPV and 95% NPV. When Ortho RSV ELISA performance was compared with that of virus isolation and DFA, the sensitivity was 86%, the specificity was 89%, the PPV was 86%, and the NPV was 89%. The accuracy of the TestPack RSV in combination with ease of performance and no need for specialized equipment or special skills make it an attractive alternative to DFA for rapid direct detection of RSV.

A comparison of direct immunofluorescence, shell vial culture, and conventional cell culture for the rapid detection of influenza A and B

Direct immunofluorescence (FA) and shell vial contrifugation cultures (SVCs) were compared with conventional tube cultures for the rapid detection of influenza A and B by using a commercial antibody. Of the 439 specimens tested, 82 were positive by conventional culture (CC). The direct smear prepared from pelleted cells or direct swab material exhibited positive fluorescence in only seven (8.5%) of these cases, whereas the SVC was positive in 30 (37%). The SVC method detected 12 additional positive isolates that were not recovered in CC. The mean time to isolation in CC was 3.6 days for influenza A and 4.3 days for influenza B. The use of SVC provided more rapid results (36-48 hr). The FA method, although more rapid, may be of limited sensitivity and difficult to interpret depending on the quality of the specimen. The results indicate that SVC complements conventional culture in the rapid detection of influenza and can detect infections that may be missed in conventional tubes, but should not be used to the exclusion of conventional culture.

Comparison of Directigen FLU-A with viral isolation and direct immunofluorescence for the rapid detection and identification of influenza A virus

Directigen FLU-A, an enzyme immunoassay membrane test, was compared prospectively to isolation in cell culture and direct immunofluorescence (IF) for the detection of influenza A virus. One hundred ninety specimens were evaluated by Directigen FLU-A and cell culture; 184 of these specimens were also tested by direct IF. The sensitivity of Directigen FLU-A compared to isolation in cell culture and direct IF was 100%. The specificities of Directigen FLU-A compared to isolation and direct IF were identical, 91.6%. Fourteen specimens that were positive by Directigen FLU-A did not yield virus in culture; two of the specimens, however, were positive by direct IF, and four other specimens were not specimens of choice for the test. A positive Directigen result had positive predictive values of 62.6 and 75.0% compared to isolation and direct IF, respectively; a positive Directigen result with an intensity reading of 2+ or greater, however, had positive predictive values of 85 and 100% compared to isolation and direct IF, respectively. In all comparisons, the negative predictive value was 100%. There was no evidence that cross-reactivity occurred with non-influenza A antigens. Directigen FLU-A should serve as a convenient screening test for influenza A and as a rapid test supported by isolation in cell culture during an influenza outbreak.

Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, indirect immunofluorescence assay, and virus isolation for detection of respiratory viruses in nasopharyngeal secretions

Nasopharyngeal secretions obtained from 94 children with acute respiratory illness were examined for the presence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, and influenza virus type A by virus culturing (virus isolation technique [VIT]), immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Similar results were obtained in at least two tests for RSV, influenza virus type A, and adenovirus in 92 (97.9%), 88 (93.6%), and 88 (93.6%) cases, respectively. Both rapid virus detection methods showed good specificity for the diagnosis of these virus infections (greater than or equal to 90.7%) and were more sensitive than was VIT for RSV detection. In a more accurate statistical analysis, the indexes of agreement between VIT and ELISA were substantial for RSV (kappa = 0.69; zeta = 5.5; P less than 0.0001), influenza virus type A (kappa = 0.67; zeta = 5.3; P less than 0.0001), and adenovirus (kappa = 0.71; zeta = 6.0; P less than 0.0001), while it was almost perfect for RSV when ELISA was compared with IFA (kappa = 0.88; zeta = 5.7; P less than 0.0001). Although the observed agreement was good in the comparison of these two tests for these three viruses (89%0, the indexes of agreement were moderate in the comparison of IFA and VIT for RSV (K = 0.55; Z = 2.0; P < 0.05), influenza virus type A (K = 0.42; Z = 9.7; P < 0.0001), and adenovirus (K = 0.41; Z = 6.5; P < 0.0001) and of ELISA and IFA for influenza virus type A (K = 0.55; Z = 7.0; P < 0.0001) and adenovirus (K = 0.59; Z = 6.8; P < 0.0001). All of the statistical evaluations demonstrated better agreement between ELISA and VIT for influenza virus type A and adenovirus.

Evaluation of combined commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of rota and adenoviruses for automation

219 stools were examined by direct electron microscopy (EM), culture and 'combined' commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (CELISA). The specificity of the combined ELISA for rotavirus was 100% as compared with EM, and 100% for adenovirus when both culture in addition to EM were carried out. ELISA appeared to be more sensitive than EM for both viruses. There was no cross-reaction between the 2 'combined' antisera. This technique may be useful for automation of viral diagnosis with ELISA using a 'panel' of selected viruses for a variety of specimens.

Detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigen after seventy-two hours of culture

Between September, 1987, and April, 1989, three techniques for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were compared: indirect immunofluorescence (IF) on the sample, indirect immunofluorescence after 72 h of MRC-5 cell culture (IF 72h), and detection of the cytopathic effect (CPE) by MRC-5 and HEp-2 cell culture. A study of 383 nasal aspirates from young children admitted to the Centre Hospitalier de Nantes (CHR) showing miscellaneous respiratory symptoms produced the following results: 143 samples (37%) were RSV positive by IF, 119 (31%) were positive by IF 72h, and 117 (31%) showed RSV-induced CPE. In comparison with tissue culture isolation (TC), the sensitivities of IF and IF 72h were 89% and 80% and their specificities 85% and 91%, respectively. During the winter of 1988-1989, of the 110 RSV-positive nasal aspirates (104 by IF, 89 by IF 72h, 83 by CPE detection), 109 were identified by IF and/or IF 72h. IF 72h affords rapid detection of RSV.

Serodiagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in children as measured by detection of RSV-specific immunoglobulins G, M, and A with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The diagnostic value of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA in sera from infants and children with proven RSV infection, from a control group, and from patients with symptoms of viral respiratory disease was analyzed. Compared to virus isolation and RSV antigen detection methods, the sensitivity of this assay was 87% and the specificity was 79%. For IgG alone, these were 45 and 92%, for IgM alone they were 48 and 92%, and for IgA alone they were 74 and 95%, respectively.

Evaluation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of rhinovirus infection

This study describes the evaluation of a newly developed ELISA for the direct detection of rhinovirus antigens in nasal washings. Of 54 volunteers inoculated with 100 TCID50 of human rhinovirus type 2 (HRV-2), 50 (96.6%) and 32 (59%) excreted antigen and virus on at least 1 of 3 days investigated, respectively. Thirty-three (61%) had significant rises in rhinovirus-specific IgA by ELISA. Twelve (22%) developed symptoms of colds. Generally the ELISA detected antigen more frequently in volunteers later in the course of infection and provided evidence of infection in a higher proportion of asymptomatic compared with symptomatic volunteers. On the other hand, virus isolation detected virus more frequently earlier in the course of infection and in a higher proportion of symptomatic compared with asymptomatic volunteers. We conclude that rhinovirus antigen detection by ELISA is a simple, rapid, sensitive, and practical test to diagnose a rhinovirus infection and potentially a viable alternative to virus isolation.

Detection of influenza virus by centrifugal inoculation of MDCK cells and staining with monoclonal antibodies

Two methods for detection of influenza virus in 451 clinical respiratory specimens were compared: (i) 24-well-plate centrifugation with Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells and staining with monoclonal antibody pools to influenza viruses A and B (Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga.) in an indirect immunofluorescence assay after incubation for 40 h, and (ii) conventional tissue cell culture with primary monkey cells and hemadsorption. For 100 of these specimens, direct examination of smears by the direct fluorescence assay with monoclonal antibodies (Boots Cell Tech/API Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) was also performed. Influenza A virus was recovered from 28 specimens by tissue cell culture after incubation for an average of 4.75 days (range, 2 to 14 days). Influenza B virus was recovered from 35 specimens by tissue culture after incubation for an average of 5.4 days (range, 3 to 14 days). By the centrifugation assay, 23 specimens were positive for influenza A virus and 30 were positive for influenza B virus. All specimens positive by the centrifugation assay were also positive by conventional tissue cell culture. The sensitivities of the centrifugation assay were 82% for detection of influenza A virus and 86% for influenza B virus (84% overall); the specificity of the assay was 100%. Of the 100 specimens studied by direct examination, 15 were positive for influenza virus by both conventional culture and centrifugation assay; however, the direct-smear results for these 15 specimens were negative in 13 cases and inconclusive in 2. The centrifugation assay is a rapid and specific method for detection of influenza A and B viruses in clinical specimens, and it can serve as a valuable and cost-efficient adjunct to conventional culture methods.