Influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes on HCV recombinant immunoblot assay patterns

Serodiagnosis for tumor viruses

The known human tumor viruses include the DNA viruses Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV), Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), human papillomavirus (HPV), and hepatitis B virus (BV). RNA tumor viruses include human T-cell lymphotrophic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The serological identification of antigens/antibodies in serum is a rapidly progressing field with utility for both scientists and clinicians. Serology is useful for conducting seroepidemiology studies and to inform on the pathogenesis and host immune response to a particular viral agent. Clinically, serology is useful for diagnosing current or past infection and for aiding in clinical management decisions. Serology is useful for screening blood donations for infectious agents and for monitoring the outcome of vaccination against these viruses. Serodiagnosis of human tumor viruses has improved in recent years with increased specificity and sensitivity of the assays, as well as reductions in cost and the ability to assess multiple antibody/antigens in single assays. Serodiagnosis of tumor viruses plays an important role in our understanding of the prevalence and transmission of these viruses and ultimately in the ability to develop treatments/preventions for these globally important diseases.

Synonymous mutations in the core gene are linked to unusual serological profile in hepatitis C virus infection

The biological role of the protein encoded by the alternative open reading frame (core+1/ARF) of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome remains elusive, as does the significance of the production of corresponding antibodies in HCV infection. We investigated the prevalence of anti-core and anti-core+1/ARFP antibodies in HCV-positive blood donors from Cambodia, using peptide and recombinant protein-based ELISAs. We detected unusual serological profiles in 3 out of 58 HCV positive plasma of genotype 1a. These patients were negative for anti-core antibodies by commercial and peptide-based assays using C-terminal fragments of core but reacted by Western Blot with full-length core protein. All three patients had high levels of anti-core+1/ARFP antibodies. Cloning of the cDNA that corresponds to the core-coding region from these sera resulted in the expression of both core and core+1/ARFP in mammalian cells. The core protein exhibited high amino-acid homology with a consensus HCV1a sequence. However, 10 identical synonymous mutations were found, and 7 were located in the aa(99–124) region of core. All mutations concerned the third base of a codon, and 5/10 represented a T>C mutation. Prediction analyses of the RNA secondary structure revealed conformational changes within the stem-loop region that contains the core+1/ARFP internal AUG initiator at position 85/87. Using the luciferase tagging approach, we showed that core+1/ARFP expression is more efficient from such a sequence than from the prototype HCV1a RNA. We provide additional evidence of the existence of core+1/ARFP in vivo and new data concerning expression of HCV core protein. We show that HCV patients who do not produce normal anti-core antibodies have unusually high levels of antit-core+1/ARFP and harbour several identical synonymous mutations in the core and core+1/ARFP coding region that result in major changes in predicted RNA structure. Such HCV variants may favour core+1/ARFP production during HCV infection.

Evaluation of the performance of 44 assays used in countries with limited resources for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted by the International Consortium for Blood Safety (ICBS) and its Collaborating Center, the Paul Ehrlich Institute, to identify high-quality, affordable assays for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies and make available information on their performance for the benefit of developing countries.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty-four assays were evaluated for their sensitivity and specificity. The assays' sensitivity was evaluated on a characterized panel of 200 anti-HCV-positive samples comprising major HCV genotypes 1 through 6. Three seroconversion panels were used to estimate sensitivity in the early infectious phase. Specificity was evaluated with a characterized ICBS-negative panel of 181 verified negative samples.

RESULTS

Sensitivity was 100 percent for 15 assays, 99.5 percent for 11 assays, 99.0 percent for 6 assays, and less than 99.0 percent for 12 assays. The false-negative results found were not linked to the genotype. Anti-HCV detection in the early infectious phase was, on average, 16.7 days later than for tests licensed in the European Union. Specificity in 25 tests was 100 percent, whereas 11 assays showed 1 false-positive result (99.45%) and the other assays were nonspecific in 2 or more samples. Two assays were not supplied in sufficient quantity to test for specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

On applying criteria for highest sensitivity (100%) and high specificity (> or =99.5%), 11 tests met the criteria. An additional 19 tests reached a performance comparable to WHO's criteria for human immunodeficiency virus antibody assays. The genotype diversity of HCV was found not to influence sensitivity of the assays.

Serotyping of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients: comparison with a standardized genotyping assay

The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and serotypes in anti-HCV-positive hemodialysis patients and determine the concordance between genotyping and serotyping methods. Sixty-two hemodialysis patients were included in this study. HCV RNA was determined using polymerase chain reaction assay and genotypes using a line probe assay. HCV serotyping was performed with competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Genotype 4 (52 patients) was the most predominant genotype, followed by type 1 (10 patients). The most prevalent HCV serotype was type 4 (41 patients), followed by serotype 1 (6 patients). We detected multiple serotypes in 4 patients and untypeable strains in 11. The overall sensitivity of serotyping assay was 82% for the study patients. According to the genotyping results, the sensitivity of serotyping was 60% and 86.5% for HCV types 1 and 4, respectively. There was a 100% concordance between results of serotyping and genotyping in the identification of HCV type 1 and 91% concordance in HCV type 4. Serological typing method may be of great value in microbiology laboratories that require a simple assay for identification of HCV genotypes, although the sensitivity of this assay may be limited by the immunocompetence of infected hemodialysis patients.

Changes in hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody status in patients with chronic hepatitis C after eradication of HCV infection by interferon therapy

BACKGROUND

Changes in hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody status were followed for 10 years after the eradication of HCV by interferon (IFN) therapy in 30 patients with chronic hepatitis C who showed a sustained virological response.

METHODS

HCV core antibody titer, third-generation HCV recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) grade (measuring the presence of antibodies for core, NS3, NS4, and NS5 antigens), and genotype-specific antibodies to the HCV NS4 region were measured annually with commercially available kits for these antibodies.

RESULTS

For grade of HCV antibody determined by RIBA, the most significant decrease was observed with anti-NS5 antibody, followed by anti-NS4, anti-NS3, and anti-core antibodies, in that order. Tests for anti-NS5 and anti-NS4 antibodies had negative results in almost 50% of patients 10 years after eradication of HCV. In contrast, the results of tests for anti-core antibody were still markedly positive in most patients. However, anti-core antibody titer decreased continuously during the 10-year follow-up period. Antibodies to the NS4 region specific for HCV genotypes 1 and 2 also decreased during the follow-up period. Differences in the rate at which antibody titers decreased were observed between antibodies for genotypes 1 and 2; as a consequence, the serological type of HCV changed during the follow-up period in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV antibody titer appears to continue to decrease during the 10 years after eradication of HCV by IFN therapy.

Low-level hepatitis C viremia and humoral immune response to NS4 in chronic hepatitis B virus-hepatitis C virus coinfection

BACKGROUND

There is a limited amount of published data on the interference of hepatitis B virus (HBV) on hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of concurrent HBV infection on serum titers of HCV RNA and HCV antibody profiles in chronic HCV infection.

METHODS

The clinical and virological profiles (serum titers of HCV RNA, HCV genotypes and antibody profiles) of 25 patients with chronic HBV-HCV coinfection were compared with those of 25 age- and sex-matched patients with HCV infection alone.

RESULTS

Among the 25 patients with HBV-HCV coinfection, only 3 were found hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA positive by hybridization assays, and the other 11 were found HBV DNA positive by polymerase chain reaction. Genotype 1b was dominant in both HBV-HCV coinfection and HCV infection alone (64% versus 84%, P > 0.1). Patients with HBV-HCV coinfection had significantly lower alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) levels and inflammatory scores but higher fibrosis scores than those with HCV infection alone. Serum titers of HCV RNA were significantly lower in HBV-HCV coinfection than in HCV infection alone. The frequency and relative intensity of antibody response to core, E2/NS1, NS3, and NS5 showed no significant difference between the two groups, but antibody response to NS4 was diminished significantly in HBV-HCV coinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

In HBV-HCV coinfection, serum levels of HBV DNA are usually low or undetectable. Concurrent HBV infection, however, could interfere with HCV replication and suppress antibody response to NS4. The biological significance of selective inhibition of humoral immune response to NS4 in HBV-HCV coinfection should be further studied.

Hepatitis C virus genetic variability: pathogenic and clinical implications

HCV is variable because of the properties of the viral RdRp, high levels of replication, and large population sizes. The Darwinian evolution of HCV has been characterized by the emergence of the HCV genotypes, including six main types and a large number of subtypes. The study of HCV genotype epidemiology provides useful information on the worldwide HCV epidemics. The HCV genotype is an important predictor of the response to IFN-alpha-based antiviral therapy, and genotype determination is currently used to tailor treatment indications. In addition, HCV circulates and behaves in infected individuals as mixtures of closely related but distinct viral populations referred to as quasispecies. This particular nature of the virus influences its transmission, the pathogenesis of liver disease and extra-hepatic manifestations, and the outcome during and after antiviral therapy or after transplantation for HCV-related end-stage liver disease. Further studies are needed to understand better the implications of HCV quasispecies diversity in the pathophysiology of HCV infection.

Anti-HCV confirmatory testing of voluntary blood donors: comparison of the sensitivity of two immunoblot assays

BACKGROUND

In this study, the sensitivity of two commercially available anti-HCV immunoblot assays (HCV Western blot (Wellcozyme] and RIBA 3.0 SIA [RIBA-3, Chiron]) was compared in a voluntary blood donor population.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Four groups of donor samples were retrospectively tested in this study. Groups 1 and 2 were donor samples that gave positive or indeterminate band patterns, respectively, when originally tested on the HCV Western blot between 1994 and 1998. These samples were tested on the RIBA 3.0. Donor samples in Groups 3 and 4 were originally tested on RIBA-3 during 1998 and 1999 and gave positive or indeterminate blot results, respectively. In this study these two groups were tested on the HCV Western blot. Samples with discrepant results on the two immunoblot assays were selected for genotyping or serotyping.

RESULTS

The two immunoblots showed similar sensitivity to the core and NS5 proteins. However, of 35 samples positive on Western blot or RIBA-3, the Western blot failed to detect NS4 in 14 samples compared with only 5 for RIBA-3. As well, the Western blot failed to detect NS3 in 6 samples compared to 2 for RIBA-3. Five (27.8%) of 18 samples that were Western blot indeterminate due to core reactivity showed an additional NS3 band on RIBA-3. Of the samples with additional NS3 and/or NS4 reactivity on RIBA-3 that were genotyped or serotyped, all were HCV type 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Western blot and RIBA-3 showed similar sensitivity to the HCV core and NS5 proteins. However, RIBA-3 showed greater sensitivity to both NS3 and NS4 compared to the Western blot. The reduced sensitivity of the Western blot to the NS3 and NS4 proteins was observed with HCV type 3 samples.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Diagnosis and Monitoring of Hepatic Injury. I. Performance Characteristics of Laboratory Tests

Purpose: To review information on performance characteristics for tests that are commonly used to identify acute and chronic hepatic injury.

Data Sources and Study Selection: A MEDLINE search was performed for key words related to hepatic tests, including quality specifications, aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyltransferase, bilirubin, albumin, ammonia, and viral markers. Abstracts were reviewed, and articles discussing performance of laboratory tests were selected for review. Additional articles were selected from the references.

Guideline Preparation and Review: Drafts of the guidelines were posted on the Internet, presented at the AACC Annual Meeting in 1999, and reviewed by experts. Areas requiring further amplification or literature review were identified for further analysis. Specific recommendations were made based on analysis of published data and evaluated for strength of evidence and clinical impact. The drafts were also reviewed by the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and approved by the committee and the Association’s Council.

Recommendations: Although many specific recommendations are made in the guidelines, some summary recommendations are discussed here. Alanine aminotransferase is the most important test for recognition of acute and chronic hepatic injury. Performance goals should aim for total error of <10% at the upper reference limit to meet clinical needs in monitoring patients with chronic hepatic injury. Laboratories should have age-adjusted reference limits for enzymes in children, and gender-adjusted reference limits for aminotransferases, γ-glutamyltransferase, and total bilirubin in adults. The international normalized ratio should not be the sole method for reporting results of prothrombin time in liver disease; additional research is needed to determine the reporting mechanism that best correlates with functional impairment. Harmonization is needed for alanine aminotransferase activity, and improved standardization for hepatitis C viral RNA measurements.

The relationship between virological characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and reactivity to the regional specific proteins of HCV

BACKGROUND

Although the polyproteins of hepatitis C virus(HCV) are processed and formed in nearly equimolar amounts, individual functional proteins have a discrepancy in their time of appearance following HCV infection and eliciting immune response. This study was conducted to compare the reactivity toward regional specific HCV protein in relation to virological characteristics, including HCV genotype and HCV replication.

METHODS

Sera from forty-five patients with chronic HCV infection were analyzed through the experiments of the recombinant immunoblot assay(RIBA-2), HCV genotyping and HCV RNA quantitation.

RESULTS

The frequencies of seropositivity to C22-3, C33C, C100-3 and 5-1-1 proteins were 91.1%, 91.1%, 64.4% and 53.3%, respectively, of all the patients, and thus the antibodies to C22-3 and C33C proteins were found more frequently (p < 0.05). The antibody responses between core or NS3 proteins and NS4 proteins showed more discrepancy in the HCC group than that in the CH group, implying a possibility of oncogenic potential of core or NS3 gene in hepatocarcinogenesis. The detection rate of antibodies to C22-3 and C33C, in accordance with serum HCV RNA levels, was significantly higher in highly viremic patients than that in low viremic patients (p < 0.05). Antibodies to C22-3, C33C, C100-3 and 5-1-1 were also found more frequently in patients with HCV genotype 1b, compared to those with HCV genotype 2a (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that antibody detection of HCV may depend on the virological characteristics of HCV, the levels of HCV replication and HCV genotype and, therefore, HCV RNA detection using RT-PCR technique is essential for confirmatory diagnosis for HCV infection. Furthermore, the HCV core or NS3 Protein may play important role in hepatocarcinogenesis.

Supplementary anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing with 2nd and 3rd generation recombinant immunoblot assay and matrix applied to enzyme immunoassay positive sera and comparison with HCV-RNA detection

A series of 118 serum samples tested positive in the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) 2nd-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA-2), and indeterminate (93 samples) or negative (25 samples) in the supplementary 2nd-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2). These sera were further evaluated by three additional tests: 3rd-generation RIBA (RIBA-3), MATRIX, and AMPLICOR HCV-PCR. For the 93 RIBA-2 indeterminate serum samples, the results of the immunoassays had a concordance of 69%. Twenty-one and 34 samples remained anti-HCV indeterminate in the RIBA-3 test and the MATRIX, respectively. Among the 25 RIBA-2-negative samples, only seven samples remained anti-HCV negative, while five samples tested anti-HCV positive in both RIBA-3 and MATRIX. The reactivity of the RIBA-3 antigen NS5 was not crucial for the result of any sample. Positive to negative contradictions between the results of MATRIX and RIBA-3 were never observed. Altogether, the MATRIX tested a significantly lower number of samples anti-HCV negative than did the RIBA-3. HCV RNA was detectable in 54/93 RIBA-2 indeterminate and 7/25 RIBA-2 negative samples. High percentages of PCR positive results among RIBA-3-indeterminate and among MATRIX-indeterminate samples indicate an increased possibility of detecting HCV RNA if at least one antigen is reactive. The type of antigen, the pattern of antigen reactivity, or the level of reactivity had no prognostic value in predicting the presence of HCV RNA. Our findings show the necessity of being cautious in the interpretation of RIBA-2-negative results.

Relation between reactivity to the NS-4 region peptides of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and clinical features among patients infected with HCV genotype 1b

Nearly all patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b have reactivity to the core (c22-3) or non-structural (NS)-3 region (c33c) protein in a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2). However, reactivities to the NS-4 region antigens (5-1-1, c100-3) vary among patients. To clarify whether differences in serological reactivities to the NS-4 antigens are associated with the clinical features or response to interferon (IFN) therapy of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b, we clinically investigated 115 such patients. Positive reactions to 5-1-1 and c100-3 were seen in 75.7 and 79.1%, respectively, of the patients. There were no differences between the patients with and those without antibodies to NS-4 region antigens (5-1-1, c100-3) with regard to age, duration of HCV infection, severity of liver disease and virus load. Fifty-one of the patients were treated with recombinant IFN-alpha, and 17 of the 51 patients showed sustained response to the therapy. The sustained response was more frequently seen in the patients positive for antibodies to both 5-1-1 and c100-3 as compared with those negative for either or both antibodies (41.0% vs. 8.3%, P<0.05).

Case report: Clinical and virological analyses of a patient positive for hepatitis C virus-RNA by branched DNA assay but negative for anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is usually diagnosed by the presence of antibodies against fusion proteins or peptides derived from different regions of the HCV genome. However, a subgroup of patients with HCV viraemia are seronegative for antibody against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) by conventional antibody assays. We analysed serum samples from a patient with liver cirrhosis who tested negative for anti-HCV by a second-generation assay, but positive for HCV-RNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and branched DNA signal amplification. To identify possible mutations that could explain the failure of detection of anti-HCV by second-generation assay, PCR-amplified DNA fragments of the core region derived from the serum were cloned and sequenced. Nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) sequence analyses (nt 1-486, aa 1-162) showed no mutations revealing stop codons, frame-shifts, deletions or insertions, but the presence of two amino acid substitutions (aa 75 and 91) when compared with HCV-J, a prototype strain of genotype 1b isolated from a Japanese patient. One of these two mutations (aa 75) was situated in the second hydrophilic domain of the core peptide, but analysis of the hydropathy profile showed only a little change. The two mutations were identical to those identified in other Japanese HCV isolates. The serum immunoglobulin level and T and B cell counts were normal in our patient. Our data suggest that the absence of anti-HCV in this patient was not due to mutations of major epitopes of HCV. Low-dose prednisolone administration just after transfusion may have induced immunological tolerance against HCV in this patient.

Serological determination of hepatitis C virus genotype: comparison with a standardized genotyping assay

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype could be routinely run in the future to tailor treatment schedules. The suitabilities of two versions of a serological, so-called serotyping assay (Murex HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-3 [SA1-3] and Murex HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-6 [SA1-6]; Murex Diagnostics Ltd.), based on the detection of genotype-specific antibodies directed to epitopes encoded by the NS4 region of the genome, for the routine determination of HCV genotypes were studied. The results were compared with those of a molecular biology-based genotyping method (HCV Line Probe Assay [INNO-LiPA HCV]; Innogenetics S.A.), based on hybridization of PCR products onto genotype-specific probes designed in the 5' noncoding region of the genome, obtained with pretreatment serum samples from 88 patients with chronic hepatitis C eligible for interferon therapy. Definitive genotyping was performed by sequence analysis of three regions of the viral genome in all samples with discrepant typing results found among at least two of the three assays studied. In all instances, sequence analysis confirmed the result of the INNO-LiPA HCV test. The sensitivity of SA1-3 was 75% relative to the results obtained by the genotyping assay. The results were concordant with those of genotyping for 92% of the samples typeable by SA1-3. The sensitivity of SA1-6 was 89% relative to the results obtained by the genotyping assay. The results were concordant with those of genotyping for 94% of the samples typeable by SA1-6. Overall, SA1-6 had increased sensitivity relative to SA1-3 but remained less sensitive than the genotyping assay on the basis of PCR amplification of HCV RNA. Cross-reactivities between different HCV genotypes could be responsible for the mistyping of 8 (SA1-3) and 6% (SA1-6) of the samples. Subtyping of 1a and 1b is still not possible with the existing peptides, but discriminating between subtypes may not be necessary for routine use.

Evaluation of Western Blot in Routine Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is among the major causes of parenterally transmitted hepatitis. Detection of infected persons would greatly diminish transmission rates and is therefore a significant parameter for prevention. Current assays are not able to resolve all cases and sometimes the results are controversial. The present study outlines problems that arise during routine testing. Two ELISA tests and three confirmatory tests were used and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) data were available for some of the samples. The results of this study show that only 77.4% of samples positive for both ELISAs were confirmed as being positive. Controversial ELISA results remained controversial, depending on the confirmatory test used. PCR results, though not complete, point to the major problem of Western blot (WB) negative sera that prove positive for the viral genome and have to be excluded from screening for blood and organ donation. Since PCR cannot be used as a routine screening procedure, improvement of the routine assays is needed to minimize ambiguous results.

Assessment of commercial enzyme immunoassay for hepatitis C virus serotyping

AIMS

To assess a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the serotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV) for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory setting, as well as for noting the serotype prevalence of selected specimens.

METHODS

Seventy six serum specimens, submitted to the laboratory for routine hepatitis studies between May 1992 and February 1996 and stored at -20 degrees C, were evaluated. These specimens were categorised into specific hepatic, renal, and paediatric clinical conditions. The specimens all tested positive for HCV antibodies on a screening EIA, with confirmation on a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). Certain specimens were also HCV RNA positive by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All the specimens were serotyped using the newly developed serotyping EIA.

RESULTS

Twenty seven (35.5%) specimens were typable. Type 5 predominated (56%), followed by type 1 (33%), types 1 and 6 (7%) and type 3 (4%). The serotype 5 specimens showed 85% and 90% reactivity with recombinant antigens c100-3 and c22-3c, respectively; serotype 1 specimens showed 75% and 100% reactivity with these antigens. All serotype 5 specimens reacted with the c33-c antigen, but only 60% of serotype 1 specimens reacted with this antigen. The differences in the reactivity of the serotype 5 and serotype 1 specimens for c33-c antigen in the RIBA were significant, but no significant differences in reactivity for antigens c-1-1, c100-3, and c22-3 were noted. Serotype 3 specimens showed equal reactivity with all four antigens used in the RIBA.

CONCLUSION

The serotyping EIA was easy to use, rapid, and cost effective compared with molecular assays. This assay seems to be ideal for the routine diagnostic laboratory setting, but could not be used for certain clinical specimens. The demonstration of serotypes 5, 1, and 3 was not unexpected in this cohort. The occurrence of serotype 6, although concurrent and more likely to be a false cross reaction with serotype 1 peptides, requires confirmation by molecular genotyping before it can be claimed that this type is present in South Africa.

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand

The prevalences of infections with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) were determined in 110 Thai patients with liver cancer, of whom 80 and 30 had histological diagnoses of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), respectively. Hepatitis B surface antigen was detected in 63.8% of HCC patients and 16.7% of those with CCA. Antibodies to HCV, detected by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay, were found in 11.3% of HCC patients and in no CCA patient. HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) was detected by polymerase chain reaction in 6 anti-HCV positive patients, and also in 2 patients who had no detectable anti-HCV antibody. A total of 11 patients had evidence of HCV infection, 8 of whom were infected with HCV alone. HCV genotypes were determined in all 8 patients who had HCV RNA; genotype 3a was the most common (62.5%). These results demonstrate that, in Thailand where both HBV and HCV are endemic, HBV infection is still the most important risk factor for HCC, but HCV also has an important role in those without HBV infection. In addition, the genotypic distribution of HCV in HCC in Thailand is similar to that in the general population. No specific association between genotype 1b and HCC was observed.

Evaluation of a pooling method for routine anti-HCV screening of blood donors to lower the cost burden on blood banks in countries under development

A pooling system was developed for use in anti-HCV screening of voluntary blood donors at the local Central American Red Cross blood banks, in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Honduras. The commercially available second generation anti-HCV screening kit from Abbott Laboratories (North Chicago, IL) was used with a modification in the initial serum dilution procedure. Pools of five sera were selected for routine screening, based on comparative studies of individual samples and of pools with different sample sizes. During the years 1993 and 1994 a total of 89, 148 voluntary blood donors were screened and a positive prevalence rate of 0.35% was established. Of the initially positive samples, 54% confirmed positive, 30% were indeterminate and 16% were negative using the Abbott Matrix test. Significant differences of positive screening prevalence rates were found in the three countries, with average values of 0.50%, 0.23% and 0.08%, respectively, in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Honduras. These initially positive samples also showed a different confirmatory pattern with a positive rate of 64% in Nicaragua, in contrast to 20% in El Salvador. Only a few samples were available for RT-PCR amplification of HCV-RNA; however, this highly sensitive method did not appear to be more helpful than serology in confirming the HCV donor status. Overall, the data obtained indicate a fluctuation of HCV prevalence in voluntary blood donors among the three Central American countries. Further, differences were found in the percentages of initially screened positives and confirmation patterns. This information appears useful for establishing criteria in future screening policies. Thus, we suggest that the use of pooling for anti-HCV screening is beneficial in countries under development, since there are potential cost savings, as well as benefits in establishment of initial prevalence rates.

An ELISA for the detection of antibody to the core antigen of hepatitis C virus: use in diagnosis and analysis of indeterminate samples

AIMS

In order to examine more carefully the natural history of hepatitis C virus infection and to determine a role for anti-core in the discrimination of indeterminate samples, a solid phase ELISA to detect antibody of the immunoglobulin G class to the hepatitis C virus core antigen was developed using purified protein expressed in Escherichia coli from a major portion of the core antigen coding region.

METHODS/RESULTS

In a study which examined 651 samples submitted for routine testing by a commercial ELISA (Ortho), only 11 samples showed discrepant results; of these, 10 were Ortho ELISA positive, anti-core negative and one was Ortho ELISA negative anticore positive. Supplemental tests showed that 5/10 of these samples were anti-HCV negative by RIBA and the reciprocal 5 were negative for anti-C22 but positive for anti-C100 and anti-C33. The Ortho ELISA negative, anticore positive sample was weakly positive for anti-C22. The anti-core ELISA was then used to examine 67 indeterminate samples from the blood bank; 11/11 samples which were HCV-RNA positive were anti-core positive and 7/56 samples which were HCV-RNA negative were anti-core positive. The anti-core titre was then examined in two groups of indeterminate samples; group 1, polymerase chain reaction-positive, anti-core positive and group 2, polymerase chain reaction-negative, anti-core positive. The geometric mean anti-core titres in these groups were 1 x 10(-3.6) and 1 x 10(-2.3), respectively. Thus in this group of indeterminate samples, all samples (except one) with an anti-core titre > or = 1/200 were polymerase chain reaction-positive, confirming a close correlation between anti-core levels and hepatitis C viraemia. Anti-core was detected with equal efficiency in patients infected with genotypes which differed to that used to express the recombinant core antigen.

Significance of indeterminate third-generation hepatitis C virus recombinant immunoblot assay

Indeterminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA3.0; Ortho Diagnostic Systems) patterns were arbitrarily defined by the manufacturer as the detection of only one antibody out of the four that were sought, namely, c100 (NS4 encoded), c22 (core encoded), c33c (NS3 encoded), and NS5 (NS5 encoded). The aims of the present study were (i) to determine the prevalence of indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns in patients consecutively tested for anti-HCV antibodies in a university hospital; (ii) to evaluate the significance of these patterns in terms of viral replication, liver disease, and risk factors for HCV; and (iii) to get an insight into the mechanism underlying this peculiar immune response. Among 3,074 serum samples consecutively tested for anti-HCV antibodies, 588 were found to be positive by screening assays. Fifty-nine of them (10%) were RIBA3.0 indeterminate and were compared with 59 RIBA3.0-positive ones. Thirty-one RIBA3.0-indeterminate and 53 RIBA3.0-positive serum samples were HCV RNA positive by PCR (53 versus 90%; P < 10(-6). RIBA3.0-indeterminate and RIBA-3.0-positive patients with positive PCR results were not significantly different for the prevalence of risk factors for HCV infection and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase activities. Immunosuppression, attributable to coexisting human immunodeficiency virus infection, organ transplantation, or the administration of immunosuppressive drugs, was significantly more frequent in PCR-positive, RIBA3.0-indeterminate patients than in PCR-negative, RIBA3.0 indeterminate patients (P < 0.001) and PCR-positive patients with a positive RIBA3.0 result (P < 0.01). The distribution of HCV genotypes did not differ significantly between HCV RNA-positive patients with indeterminate or positive RIBA3.0 results. In conclusion, the prevalence of indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns in virology laboratories is about 10%; in about half of these patients HCV replication is detected by PCR; the main factor responsible for indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns could be immunosuppression, whereas HCV genotypes do not seem to play major role.

Biological and clinicopathological features associated with hepatitis C virus type 5 infections

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The biological and clinicopathological features of hepatitis C virus infections of type 1 and type 2 have been well documented. However, little is known about the nature of HCV type 5 infections, which have been found to occur in South Africa but rarely elsewhere.

METHODS

We investigated the HCV genotypes in 125 viremic blood donors and 125 viremic patients by restriction endonuclease analysis of amplified 5' non-coding region sequences. Donors and patients infected with type 5 were further studied. Serum HCV RNA levels were assessed by a differential-size PCR-aided transcript titration assay.

RESULTS

HCV type 5 infections were identified in seven (5.6%) of the blood donors and in five (4.0%) of the patients. Sera from these 12 persons reacted with the core and NS3 antigens in both RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 tests. Six (50%) and 10 (83%) sera reacted with the NS4 antigens in RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 tests, respectively. HCV type 5 was found to replicate to high titers that ranged from 10(6.0) to 10(8.0) molecules/ml. Transfusion was the most frequently observed risk factor (5 of 12) and persons infected with type 5 were generally older than those infected with other types (< 40 years vs. > or = 40 years, p = 0.01). Cirrhosis was found in two of six (33%) donors and three of four (75%) patients. The duration of infection appeared to be an important determinant for the presence of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small group of Canadians infected with HCV type 5, a high proportion developed severe liver disease.

Significance of anti-hepatitis C virus core IgM antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Antihepatitis C virus (HCV) IgM antibodies were found in patients with both acute and chronic hepatitis C. The aims of the study were to determine the significance, in terms of liver disease and virological parameters, of anti-HCV core IgM antibodies in the serum of patients with chronic hepatitis C, and the possible relationship between the presence of these antibodies before treatment and biochemical and virological responses to interferon therapy. Sixty-one patients with chronic hepatitis C were studied. Tests for serum anti-HCV core IgM antibodies were carried out before treatment. The patients received 3 mega units of interferon alpha-2a subcutaneously thrice weekly for at least 3 months (6 months when alanine aminotransferase activity was normal at month 3). A biochemical response to interferon therapy was defined as normal alanine aminotransferase activity at the end of treatment (month 6: biochemical response) and 6 months later (month 12: sustained biochemical response). A sustained virological response was defined as serum HCV RNA negativity by a polymerase chain reaction-based detection method (PCR) in patients with normal alanine aminotransferase at month 12. Anti-HCV core IgM antibodies were detected in 28 of the 61 patients (46%). The prevalence of these antibodies was significantly higher in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 (including subtypes 1a and 1b) than in patients infected with other genotypes (including 2a and 3a) (57% vs. 17%; P < 0.01). No significant difference was found between IgM-positive and IgM-negative patients as regards the mean age, sex ratio, serum alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activities, the prevalence of cirrhosis in liver biopsy specimens, detection of HCV RNA by PCR, and quantitation by branched DNA assay. At month 6 of interferon therapy, normal alanine aminotransferase activity was significantly more frequent in IgM-negative than in IgM-positive patients (52% vs. 21%, respectively; P < 0.02). At month 12, normal alanine aminotransferase activity and PCR negativity were significantly more frequent in IgM-negative than in IgM-positive patients (18% vs. 0%, P < 0.04). It is concluded that anti-HCV core IgM antibodies in serum are significantly more frequent in patients infected by HCV type 1 than by other types. This suggests that their overall prevalence in patients with chronic hepatitis C in industrialized countries, where HCV type 1 accounts for the majority of infections, would be of the order of 50%, that anti-HCV core IgM antibodies are not associated with characteristic features of liver disease, and that their presence before treatment is associated with a failure of interferon alpha therapy to clear the virus.