Evaluation of the AMPLICOR CMV test for direct detection of cytomegalovirus in plasma specimens

A Practical Review of Cytomegalovirus in Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous Herpesviridae virus with a wide spectrum of pathology in humans. Host immunity is a major determinant of the clinical manifestation of CMV and can vary widely in the gastroenterology and hepatology practice setting. Immunocompetent patients generally develop a benign, self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome whereas gastrointestinal tissue-invasive disease is more frequently seen in immunocompromised and inflammatory bowel disease patients. Additionally, liver allograft dysfunction is a significant consequence of CMV infection in liver transplant patients. While polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry techniques allow for the reliable and accurate detection of CMV in the human host, the diagnostic value of different serologic, endoscopic, and histologic tests depends on a variety of factors. Similarly, latent CMV, CMV infection, and CMV disease carry different significance depending on the patient population, and the decision to initiate antiviral therapy can be complex and patient-specific. This review will focus on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CMV in patient populations relevant to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology-liver transplant recipients, inflammatory bowel disease patients, and otherwise immunocompetent patients.

Comparison of cytomegalovirus pp-65 antigenemia assay and plasma DNA correlation with the clinical outcome in transplant recipients

The relationship between quantitative antigenemia and plasma DNAemia was studied for monitoring cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in CMV infection (CMVI) or disease (CMVD), in 20 transplant recipients (13 CMD, seven CMVI). A total of 142 samples of blood were assayed for CMV-DNA and pp-65 antigenemia (CMV-Ag). A quantitative correlation between both markers was found (P < 0.0001). First CMV antigenemia as well as first plasma DNA viral load was similar in CMVI and CMVD (29 vs. 24 CMV-Ag+ cells/10(5) PMN; and 7445 vs. 12407 CMV-DNA copies/ml). The maximum antigenemia was higher in CMVD than in CMVI (146 +/- 87 vs. 61 +/- 54 +cells/10(5) PMN, P < 0.05), but the highest CMV plasma viral load was similar in both groups (62592 +/- 33000 vs. 42055 +/- 38600 copies/ml). In nine patients, maximum antigenemia coincided with highest plasma DNA viral load, but in 10 highest DNAemia occurred 6 days later. On the contrary, antigenemia declined faster than CMV-DNAnemia, after treatment.

Evaluation of a new automated, standardized generic nucleic acid extraction method (total nucleic acid isolation kit) used in combination with cytomegalovirus DNA quantification by COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR

The new generic Total Nucleic Acid Isolation kit improved the detection limit of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR from 400 to 200 copies/ml. Sensitivity and specificity in 30 CMV-positive and 100 negative samples were 100%. Analytical performance was excellent. The kit provides a reliable, standardized, and time-saving tool for DNA extraction.

Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants

The main risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) are recipient CMV seropositivity and acute graft-versus-host disease. Currently, two antiviral strategies, prophylactic or preemptive antiviral treatment, are used for prevention of CMV disease. Preemptive treatment is most favorable when short-term (14-day) treatment is applied. Several methods are available for monitoring of CMV reactivation. PCR-based CMV DNA detection assays are the most sensitive methods; however, the clinical benefit of this high sensitivity is unclear. Even more, there is lack of clarity whether PCR tests can better be performed with plasma, whole blood, or peripheral blood leukocyte samples. Recovery of a CMV-specific CD8(+) cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) response is necessary for preventing CMV reactivation and disease. Reconstitution of absolute CMV-specific CTL counts to values above 10 x 10(6) to 20 x 10(6) CTLs/liter is associated with protection from CMV disease. In the near future, preemptive therapy might be withheld in patients with CMV reactivation who are shown to have adequate CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cell levels. Antiviral therapy with (val)acyclovir has been studied only as prophylactic treatment for prevention of CMV infection. High-dose oral valacyclovir is more effective than acyclovir when used in addition to preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation with ganciclovir or foscarnet. Three antiviral drugs have been tested for preemptive therapy of CMV reactivation and/or treatment of CMV disease. Although intravenous ganciclovir is considered the drug of choice, foscarnet has similar efficacy and less toxicity, especially hematologic toxicity. Cidofovir has not been tested extensively, but so far the results are disappointing. Oral valganciclovir for preemptive treatment of SCT recipients is currently being studied. In addition to antiviral therapy, adoptive immunotherapy with CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells as prophylactic or preemptive therapy is a very elegant strategy; however, generation of these cells is expensive and time-consuming, and therefore the therapy is not available at every transplantation center. Magnetic selection of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells from peripheral blood by using HLA class I-peptide tetramers may be very promising, making this strategy more accessible.

Diagnosis and management of human cytomegalovirus infection in the mother, fetus, and newborn infant

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is the leading cause of congenital viral infection and mental retardation. HCMV infection, while causing asymptomatic infections in most immunocompetent subjects, can be transmitted during pregnancy from the mother with primary (and also recurrent) infection to the fetus. Hence, careful diagnosis of primary infection is required in the pregnant woman based on the most sensitive serologic assays (immunoglobulin M [IgM] and IgG avidity assays) and conventional virologic and molecular procedures for virus detection in blood. Maternal prognostic markers of fetal infection are still under investigation. If primary infection is diagnosed in a timely manner, prenatal diagnosis can be offered, including the search for virus and virus components in fetal blood and amniotic fluid, with fetal prognostic markers of HCMV disease still to be defined. However, the final step for definite diagnosis of congenital HCMV infection is detection of virus in the blood or urine in the first 1 to 2 weeks of life. To date, treatment of congenital infection with antiviral drugs is only palliative both prior to and after birth, whereas the only efficacious preventive measure seems to be the development of a safe and immunogenic vaccine, including recombinant, subunit, DNA, and peptide-based vaccines now under investigation. The following controversial issues are discussed in the light of the most recent advances in the field: the actual perception of the problem; universal serologic screening before pregnancy; the impact of correct counseling on decision making by the couple involved; the role of prenatal diagnosis in ascertaining transmission of virus to the fetus; the impact of preconceptional and periconceptional infections on the prevalence of congenital infection; and the prevalence of congenitally infected babies born to mothers who were immune prior to pregnancy compared to the number born to mothers undergoing primary infection during pregnancy.

Diagnosis and management of human cytomegalovirus infection in the mother, fetus, and newborn infant

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is the leading cause of congenital viral infection and mental retardation. HCMV infection, while causing asymptomatic infections in most immunocompetent subjects, can be transmitted during pregnancy from the mother with primary (and also recurrent) infection to the fetus. Hence, careful diagnosis of primary infection is required in the pregnant woman based on the most sensitive serologic assays (immunoglobulin M [IgM] and IgG avidity assays) and conventional virologic and molecular procedures for virus detection in blood. Maternal prognostic markers of fetal infection are still under investigation. If primary infection is diagnosed in a timely manner, prenatal diagnosis can be offered, including the search for virus and virus components in fetal blood and amniotic fluid, with fetal prognostic markers of HCMV disease still to be defined. However, the final step for definite diagnosis of congenital HCMV infection is detection of virus in the blood or urine in the first 1 to 2 weeks of life. To date, treatment of congenital infection with antiviral drugs is only palliative both prior to and after birth, whereas the only efficacious preventive measure seems to be the development of a safe and immunogenic vaccine, including recombinant, subunit, DNA, and peptide-based vaccines now under investigation. The following controversial issues are discussed in the light of the most recent advances in the field: the actual perception of the problem; universal serologic screening before pregnancy; the impact of correct counseling on decision making by the couple involved; the role of prenatal diagnosis in ascertaining transmission of virus to the fetus; the impact of preconceptional and periconceptional infections on the prevalence of congenital infection; and the prevalence of congenitally infected babies born to mothers who were immune prior to pregnancy compared to the number born to mothers undergoing primary infection during pregnancy.

Evaluation of the NucliSens CMV pp67 assay for detection and monitoring of human cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Preemptive treatment based on the sensitive detection of CMV-DNA has helped to reduce HCMV-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Detection of active viral replication might help to better predict HCMV disease. In this study, 33 recipients at risk for HCMV infection after allogeneic SCT were prospectively monitored 1x/week for active HCMV infection by NASBA, whole blood DNA-PCR and virus culture assays. Preemptive antiviral therapy was initiated after the second positive PCR result, while NASBA results were not considered for clinical decision-making. Overall, a high agreement between PCR and NASBA on a per sample (85.3%) and per patient (87.9%) level was demonstrated. HCMV DNA titers in the blood were found to be higher in PCR(+)/NASBA(+) compared to PCR(+)/NASBA(-) samples (P < 0.01). None of the NASBA-negative patients developed HCMV disease. Sixteen of 18 patients receiving PCR-based preemptive therapy were also found NASBA positive. There was no difference between the assays for the time to the first positive test result. However, the time to the first negative test result upon initiation of antiviral therapy was significantly shorter for the NASBA assay (P = 0.002), indicating a high positive predictive value to assess the efficacy of antiviral therapy. Three patients developed late-onset HCMV disease, all of whom were found to be PCR and NASBA positive. In conclusion, the data presented clearly demonstrate the value of patient monitoring using the NASBA assay to early diagnose active HCMV infection and to assess the efficacy of antiviral therapy in high risk patients after allogeneic SCT. A prospective comparison of PCR-based vs NASBA-based preemptive therapy is ongoing.

Monitoring of viral load by quantitative plasma PCR during active cytomegalovirus infection of individual liver transplant patients

A quantitative PCR test, the Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor, was used for the monitoring of viral load in the peripheral blood of 27 individual liver transplant patients and correlated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia. Altogether, 243 specimens were analyzed. During the first 3 months, 20 patients showed PCR positivity which correlated with pp65 antigenemia. Of those, 13 patients developed symptomatic CMV infection 27 to 52 days after transplantation, with a significantly higher peak viral load in PCR and in pp65 assay compared with the seven asymptomatic infections (median 10,200 versus 2,240 copies/ml, P < 0.05, and median 100 versus 30 pp65-positive cells/50,000 leukocytes, P < 0.01). Five were primary infections of D+/R- cases (donor CMV seropositive and recipient seronegative) and demonstrated, except in one case, a high peak viral load (>10,000 copies/ml; range, 10,200 to 21,600 copies, and > or =50 positive cells, range, 50 to 800 cells). The peak viral loads of the six D+/R+ patients with symptomatic infection varied widely (range, 2,290 to 126,000 copies and 50 to 300 positive cells). Two D-/R+ patients developed symptomatic infection with a lower viral load (range, 1,120 to 6,510 copies and 25 to 100 positive cells). All symptomatic infections were successfully treated with ganciclovir. The asymptomatic infections all in D+/R+ patients with low copy numbers (<5,500 copies) were monitored until CMV disappeared. One of the seven PCR-negative patients had one sample with low antigenemia, but the subsequent specimens were all negative. The time-related correlation of the two methods was also good. In summary, quantitative PCR could equally well be used as the CMV pp65 assay for the monitoring of viral load in individual transplant patients.

Dose-adjusted preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease based on real-time polymerase chain reaction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We have prospectively evaluated the efficacy of real-time PCR-guided preemptive therapy for CMV diseases in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with grades II-IV acute GVHD. The dose of ganciclovir was adjusted according to the viral load determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). On detecting CMV reactivation in the plasma, ganciclovir was initiated at a dose of 5 mg/kg body weight once daily, and the dose was increased to twice daily if viral load continued to increase after initiating ganciclovir. In 39 evaluable patients, CMV reactivation assessed by real-time PCR became positive in 30 (77%). One developed CMV gastroenteritis before PCR became positive. Thus the remaining 29 patients were treated preemptively with ganciclovir. The dose of ganciclovir was increased in 12 patients (41%) of preemptively treated patients for increasing viral load. CMV diseases were diagnosed in two patients (one gastroenteritis and one retinitis), and late CMV disease was diagnosed in one patient (gastritis). The treatment was generally well-tolerated, but three patients (10%) developed neutropenia (neutrophil count less than 1.0 x 10(9)/l). In conclusion, real-time PCR-guided preemptive therapy with decreased dose of ganciclovir is feasible and does not increase the frequency of CMV diseases if the dose is adjusted according to the viral load.

Comparative quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in solid organ transplant recipients with CMV infection by using two high-throughput automated systems

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in clinical specimens is progressively becoming a cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of CMV infection in the immunocompromised host. We evaluated two automated and reproducible PCR tests, the LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.) and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, Calif.), for the detection of CMV DNA in blood samples from transplant recipients with CMV infection as determined by shell vial culture. Following a log transformation analysis, the mean CMV DNA in plasma (PL), whole blood (WB), peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using the LightCycler was 6.79 copies per ml, 7.23 copies per ml, 6.38 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, and 6.27 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, respectively. This compares to 7.86 copies per ml, 8.37 copies per ml, 7.59 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, and 7.44 copies per 2 x 10(6) cells, respectively, using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor. While higher CMV DNA levels were observed for the various blood compartments analyzed using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor, a high degree of correlation was evident between the two automated systems (jackknife correlation r = PL 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.64, 0.90], WB 0.77 [95% CI; 0.62, 0.92], PBL 0.77 [95% CI; 0.67, 0.88], and PBMC 0.81 [95% CI; 0.72, 0.89], all P < 0.001). Therefore, we conclude that either automated diagnostic system is accurate for CMV DNA quantitation.

Qualitative plasma PCR assay (AMPLICOR CMV test) versus pp65 antigenemia assay for monitoring cytomegalovirus viremia and guiding preemptive ganciclovir therapy in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The performances of a commercially available qualitative plasma PCR assay (AMPLICOR CMV test; Roche Diagnostics) and the pp65 antigenemia assay (AG) were evaluated for the monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in 43 allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. In addition, the suitabilities of both assays for triggering the initiation of preemptive ganciclovir therapy were assessed. A total of 37 CMV viremic episodes were detected in 28 patients. Positivity of plasma PCR testing in one or more consecutive specimens was the only marker of CMV viremia in 18 of the 37 episodes (PCR positive and AG negative, n = 50 specimens). Five episodes were diagnosed on the basis of a single positive AG result (AG positive and PCR negative, n = 5 specimens); both assays were eventually positive (PCR positive and AG positive, n = 27 specimens) for 14 viremic episodes; for these episodes, conversion of the PCR assay result to a positive result occurred an average of 1 week before conversion of the AG result. Overall, the concordance between the two methods was 90%, and the sensitivities of the plasma PCR assay and AG for the detection of CMV viremic episodes were 86.5 and 51.3%, respectively. Two patients who tested positive by both assays simultaneously progressed to CMV end-stage organ disease, despite the initiation of preemptive ganciclovir therapy. Conversion of the AG result to a negative result upon administration of preemptive ganciclovir therapy occurred a median of 7.5 days earlier than conversion of the plasma PCR assay result. Nineteen of the 28 patients with CMV viremia received AG-guided preemptive ganciclovir therapy; had the positivity of the plasma PCR assay triggered the initiation of preemptive therapy, 9 additional patients would have been unnecessarily treated since none of them developed CMV end-stage organ disease. Although the AMPLICOR CMV assay is more sensitive than AG, the latter appears to be more suitable both for guiding the initiation of preemptive therapy and for monitoring a patient's response to antiviral therapy.

Comparison of plasma polymerase chain reaction and pp65-antigenemia assay in the quantification of cytomegalovirus in liver and kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant problem in transplantation. The antiviral treatment is based on the clinical symptoms and the rapid laboratory diagnosis. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods have already been widely used, the clinical correlation of the findings is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of a quantitative plasma PCR test and compare it with the pp65-antigenemia test in the detection of clinically significant CMV infections in liver and kidney transplant patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The clinical material consisted of 253 consecutive blood samples was tested using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction test, Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor (Roche) and pp65 antigenemia assay. Plasma was used for PCR and leucocytes were used for the antigenemia test.

RESULTS

CMV was detected in 89 out of 253 blood samples by one or both methods. PCR detected 78 (range 274-165000 copies/ml) and pp65 antigenemia test 79 (range 1-1500 positive cells/50000) of the positive findings. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR test was 86 and 94%, respectively. The PCR detected all clinically significant CMV infections (>10 positive cells in pp65 test) and infections which required antiviral treatment. In addition, the correlation between the two tests was almost linear.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative PCR appears to be a suitable alternative to diagnose and monitor CMV infections in transplant patients.

Evaluation of the Murex CMV DNA Hybrid Capture assay (version 2.0) for early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in recipients of an allogeneic stem cell transplant

Early diagnosis of CMV infection based on sensitive diagnostic assays has helped to reduce CMV-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In this study, the commercialized Murex CMV DNA Hybrid Capture assay (version 2.0) (HCS) was prospectively compared to an in-house CMV-DNA PCR assay from whole blood in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Overall, a high concordance between HCS and PCR was documented (kappa = 0.686; n = 385). The HCS assay was found to be as sensitive as the PCR indicating active CMV infection at a median of 35 and 34 days after transplantation, respectively. None of the HCS-negative patients developed CMV-related symptoms (negative predictive value 100%). Declining CMV DNA load in the blood was found to be an indicator for effective antiviral therapy, whereas persistence of a high viral load was associated with fatal CMV disease. In conclusion, the Hybrid Capture CMV DNA assay (v 2.0) allows early diagnosis of CMV infection after allogeneic SCT and assessment of the efficacy of antiviral therapy.

Analysis of human cytomegalovirus DNA in urines of newborns and infants by means of a new ultrarapid real-time PCR-system

BACKGROUND

Amplification techniques such as PCR are becoming increasingly popular in the field of diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) also, thus substituting conventional techniques like the time consuming HCMV antigen or cell culture assays. Current PCR protocols however, are labor intensive, and moreover, the need for extensive postamplification manipulations increases the risk of false positive results due to contamination with amplified products.

OBJECTIVES

to overcome these shortcomings, the new ultrarapid and semi-automated real-time LightCycler PCR-system (LC-PCR), which combines amplification and detection in a closed capillary system, was tested for its suitability in diagnosis of HCMV in urines.

STUDY DESIGN

73 urine samples from 64 newborns and infants suspected of having congenitally or postnatally acquired HCMV were tested with the LC-PCR and results were compared with those obtained in parallel with a conventional PCR-ELISA and the rapid shell vial assay for detection of HCMV early antigen (EA-assay).

RESULTS

with these methods, 31 newborns/infants were found to be infected with HCMV. HCMV DNA was detected in 39 urines while the EA-assay was positive in 33 urines. All the EA positive samples were also positive for HCMV DNA. In the urines of the remaining 33 newborns (34 urine samples) neither HCMV DNA nor EA were detectable. The overall agreement of the two PCR tests was 100% while a 92% agreement was obtained between the PCR and the EA-assays. As the sensitivity of the three tests turned out to be quite similiar, the discrepancy observed in the positive rate between PCR and EA-assay is due to other factors which will be discussed in detail. However, while LC-PCR takes only about 2 h from sample preparation to result generation, the EA-assay, such as the conventional PCR-ELISA, needs 24-48 h. Furthermore, due to its capability to perform cycle-by-cycle monitoring, the LC instrument enables semi-quantitative analysis of HCMV viral-load.

CONCLUSIONS

LC-PCR is a suitable new tool for routine analysis of HCMV in the urines of newborns and infants. Compared to the conventional PCR-ELISA a considerable increase in test rapidity and reliability is achieved without the need to sacrifice sensitivity.

Quantitative analysis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia using the pp65 antigenemia assay and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR PCR test after blood and marrow allogeneic transplantation

The performance of a commercially available qualitative PCR test for plasma (AMPLICOR CMV Test; Roche Diagnostics) and a quantitative PCR test for plasma and leukocytes (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test; Roche Diagnostics) was evaluated with samples from 50 blood or marrow allogeneic transplant recipients who received short courses of sequential ganciclovir therapy (2 weeks intravenously followed by 2 weeks orally) based on a positive cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia (AG) assay. The number of persons with a positive CMV test was significantly higher for leukocyte-based assays (AG, 67.5%; PCR, 62.5%) compared to both quantitative and qualitative PCR tests of plasma (42.5 and 35%, respectively). One person developed CMV disease during the study despite a negative AG assay; in this particular case, all PCR assays were found to be positive 10 days before his death. There was a trend for earlier positivity after transplantation and more rapid negativity after initiation of ganciclovir for the tests performed on leukocytes. The mean number of CMV copies as assessed by PCR was significantly higher in leukocytes than in plasma (P = 0.02). Overall, excellent agreement (kappa coefficient, >0.75) was found only between the two PCR assays (qualitative and quantitative) based on plasma. These results suggest that either the pp65 AG assay or the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test using leukocytes could be used to safely monitor CMV viremia in related allogeneic blood or marrow transplant recipients. Such a strategy will result in preemptive treatment for about two-thirds of the persons with a relatively low rate (<33%) of secondary viremic episodes following short courses of ganciclovir therapy.

False-positive results of plasma PCR for cytomegalovirus DNA due to delayed sample preparation

Positive results by cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR of plasma are considered predictive of active CMV infection in kidney allograft recipients. To assess whether contamination with leukocyte-derived CMV DNA can distort the results, aliquots of whole-blood samples from 60 CMV immunoglobulin G-positive patients with leukocyte CMV DNAemia were stored for up to 24 h at room temperature (RT) and at 4 degrees C before plasma preparation. Native and ultrafiltered plasma samples were tested by CMV and beta-globin PCRs. Among 30 latently infected patients (negative for CMV pp65 antigens), low baseline rates (10%) and levels (median number of copies, 10 [per 10 microl]) of CMV plasma DNAemia in native plasma samples increased significantly over time (after 4 h at RT, 37% [P < 0.001]; median number of copies, 45 [P < 0.001]). Similar effects were found during storage at 4 degrees C. Ultrafiltration reduced the levels of CMV plasma DNAemia, but by 6 h of storage the levels were significantly elevated as well. CMV and beta-globin DNA kinetics in plasma were parallel. In contrast, 30 actively infected patients (pp65 positive) had high baseline rates (87% in native samples) and levels (median number of copies, 75) of CMV plasma DNAemia. No significant effects of storage or ultrafiltration and no concordance with beta-globin DNA kinetics were seen. In conclusion, delayed preparation of plasma samples bears a significant risk of false-positive CMV PCR results, probably due to leukocyte lysis. This has important implications in the clinical setting and for PCR standardization.

Comparison of PCR, antigenemia assay, and rapid blood culture for detection and prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after lung transplantation

The goal of this study was to evaluate serial cytomegalovirus (CMV) blood culture, antigenemia testing, and qualitative and quantitative plasma CMV PCR for their ability to predict CMV disease and thus to direct preemptive therapy after lung transplantation. Forty-one patients provided 414 samples for blood culture, 290 samples for antigenemia testing, and 432 samples for PCR. Seven patients developed 11 episodes of CMV disease. CMV PCR had sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values of 79, 99, 84, and 99%, respectively, compared with 48, 99, 85, and 98%, respectively, for antigenemia testing, and 8, 100, 100, and 97%, respectively, for culture. Only quantitative CMV PCR correlated with disease stage: asymptomatic patients had a mean of 1,500 CMV DNA copies/ml, whereas patients who developed CMV disease had 5,087 copies/ml 12 to 4 weeks before symptoms and 32,000 copies/ml at diagnosis. Furthermore, CMV PCR-measured DNA increased 5- to 10-fold immediately preceding symptoms. PCR and antigenemia test values decreased with anti-CMV therapy. CMV DNA (as detected by PCR), but not antigenemia, persisted in patients who later developed recurrent CMV disease. The data indicate that lung transplant recipients will benefit from monitoring of CMV disease by plasma CMV PCR.

New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients

In the past three decades since the inception of human organ transplantation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) has gained increasing clinical import because it is a common pathogen in the immunocompromised transplant recipient. Patients may suffer from severe manifestations of this infection along with the threat of potential fatality. Additionally, the dynamic evolution of immunosuppressive and antiviral agents has brought forth changes in the natural history of CMV infection and disease. Transplant physicians now face the daunting task of recognizing and managing the changing spectrum of CMV infection and its consequences in the organ recipient. For the microbiology laboratory, the emphasis has been geared toward the development of more sophisticated detection assays, including methods to detect emerging antiviral resistance. The discovery of novel antiviral chemotherapy is an important theme of clinical research. Investigations have also focused on preventative measures for CMV disease in the solid-organ transplant population. In all, while much has been achieved in the overall management of CMV infection, the current understanding of CMV pathogenesis and therapy still leaves much to be learned before success can be claimed.

Comparison of cytomegalovirus loads in plasma and leukocytes of patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis. The Cytomegalovirus Retinitis and Viral Resistance Study Group

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA loads in paired leukocyte and plasma samples from 199 patient visits by 66 patients with CMV retinitis were determined. Leukocyte CMV load determinations had a greater range of values (mean, 24,587 copies/10(6) leukocytes; maximum, 539, 000) than did plasma CMV load determinations (mean, 10,302 copies/ml; maximum, 386,000), and leukocyte viral loads were detectable in a greater proportion of patients at the time of diagnosis of CMV retinitis prior to initiation of anti-CMV therapy (82%) than were plasma viral loads (64%) (P = 0.0078). Agreement with CMV blood cultures was slightly better for plasma (kappa = 0. 68) than for leukocytes (kappa = 0.53), due to a greater proportion of patients with detectable viral loads in leukocytes having negative blood cultures.

Evaluation of the AMPLICOR cytomegalovirus test with specimens from human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects

The AMPLICOR cytomegalovirus (CMV) test, a new qualitative assay for the detection of CMV DNA in plasma, was compared to conventional methods and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) assays by using leukocytes and plasma from 179 blood samples from subjects with AIDS. For the diagnosis of CMV disease, cell-based assays such as a Q-PCR with polymorphonuclear leukocytes (Q-PCR-PMNL) and a pp65 antigenemia assay had the highest sensitivities but suffered from a lack of specificity. The best agreement between the results of the Q-PCR-PMNL assay and those of the AMPLICOR test was found when a threshold diagnostic value of 690 copies per 10(5) cells was selected for the Q-PCR-PMNL assay. In that context, the AMPLICOR CMV test had a sensitivity of 96.4% and a specificity of 95.3% when results were compared to results of the cell-based PCR assay. This threshold was close to the one described as associated with the best sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of CMV disease in a recently published study (4). Blood samples that tested positive by the Q-PCR-PMNL assay but negative by the AMPLICOR CMV test were associated with viral loads (mean, 785 copies, median, 96 copies per 10(5) leukocytes) lower than the viral loads of blood samples that tested positive by both assays (mean, 21,452 copies; median, 9,784 copies per 10(5) leukocytes) (P = 0.003). The AMPLICOR CMV test gave positive results at least 48 days before the development of symptomatic CMV disease in a longitudinal analysis of a limited subset of patients (n = 6) from whom sequential specimens were available for testing. In conclusion, the AMPLICOR CMV test is a very convenient assay combining rapidity, simplicity, and the possibility of batch testing. A positive result by this test seems particularly important since this implies, in most instances, the presence or the imminence of CMV disease, although a negative test result does not rule out disease.

Detection of cytomegalovirus in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid specimens from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients by the AMPLICOR CMV test

We have developed the AMPLICOR CMV Test, which is rapid and sensitive for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens. The test incorporated an internal control in the reaction mixture to monitor the amplification efficiency and the presence of inhibitors. The AMPLICOR CMV Test was very specific in detecting 12 clinical CMV isolates and four laboratory CMV strains tested. Cross-reactivity with 26 non-CMV pathogens was not observed. The AMPLICOR CMV Test requires only 50 microl of specimen (plasma or CSF) for processing. The performance of the AMPLICOR CMV Test was compared to those of the CMV antigenemia assay and the conventional tube culture method. Among 112 plasma specimens from 43 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients, CMV was detected in 20 (18%) of the specimens by the AMPLICOR CMV Test, 21 (19%) of the specimens by the CMV antigenemia assay, and 10 (9%) of the specimens by culture. In CSF specimens from AIDS patients, CMV was detected in 10 of 58 (17%) specimens tested by the AMPLICOR CMV Test, 5 of 28 (18%) specimens tested by the antigen assay, and none of the 25 specimens tested by culture. While the performance of the AMPLICOR CMV Test in this study was comparable to that of the CMV antigen assay, processing of specimens by the AMPLICOR CMV Test was much simpler than that by the antigen assay; in addition, the antigen assay requires greater than 10(5) leukocytes from blood or 1 ml of CSF to perform the assay. Our study suggested that the AMPLICOR CMV Test could provide a rapid and sensitive assay for the detection of CMV in plasma and CSF specimens.

Use of laboratory assays to predict cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients

Eight laboratory assays, viz., the pp65 direct antigenemia test, a quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) assay (Biomerieux VIDAS), a CMV-specific IgM assay (Biomerieux VIDAS), the Hybrid Capture system (Murex), an in-house PCR with plasma (P-PCR) and leukocytes (L-PCR), and a commercial PCR (Roche AMPLICOR) with plasma (P-AMP) and leukocytes (L-AMP), were compared for their abilities to predict CMV disease before the onset of illness in a prospective study of 37 renal transplant recipients. By using an expanded criterion for active infection (two or more of the markers positive) and a clinical definition of disease, 22 (59%) patients were identified as having active CMV infection and 13 (35%) were identified as having CMV disease. Of the 13 CMV-seronegative recipients who received seropositive kidneys (R- group), 8 had active infection and disease. All assays were 100% specific and 100% predictive of CMV disease in the R- group. The leukocyte PCRs (L-PCR and L-AMP) were the most sensitive assays, had positive results an average of between 8 and 13 days before the onset of illness, and were the assays of choice. The performance of the assays was less satisfactory for the 24 patients who were CMV seropositive before transplantation (R+ group). A negative result was more useful for this group. Overall, P-AMP had the best results, and it could be the assay of choice for monitoring R+ patients. The non-PCR-based methods generally had high specificities but often gave late positive results and were not sensitive enough for use as prediction tools for either group of patients.

Evaluation of the murex hybrid capture cytomegalovirus DNA assay versus plasma PCR and shell vial assay for diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus viremia in immunocompromised patients

We evaluated a cytomegalovirus (CMV) 24-hour shell vial assay (SVA), the Murex Hybrid Capture CMV DNA assay (HCA), and a CMV plasma PCR for the detection of CMV viremia in renal and bone marrow transplant recipients and human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. CMV viremia was detected by at least one method in 125 of 317 evaluable samples (39.4%) from 78 patients and was detected in 19.8% of samples by SVA, 26.8% by HCA, and 32.2% by plasma PCR. There was moderate to substantial agreement between the results of the different tests (kappa coefficient = 0.415 to 0.631). However, HCA and plasma PCR were significantly more sensitive than SVA (P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively; McNemar's test), and plasma PCR was more sensitive than HCA (P = 0.031; McNemar's test). HCA and plasma PCR were more consistently positive than SVA during viremic episodes (P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001, respectively; McNemar's test). The use of HCA or plasma PCR may therefore improve the diagnosis and management of CMV disease in susceptible patient groups.

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus: methodologic aspects and clinical applications

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important pathogen in transplant recipients and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals. Major progress has been made in developing quantitative detection methods for CMV in recent years. Due to their high sensitivity, these assays can detect CMV early, and quantitation may be useful in predicting the patient's risk for disease and in monitoring the effect of antiviral therapy. This review discusses methodological aspects of currently used quantitative assays for CMV (i.e., viral culture techniques, antigen detection assays, DNA detection assays including PCR, branched-DNA assay, and the DNA hybrid capture assay) and addresses the correlation of systemic and site-specific CMV load and CMV disease in different populations of immunosuppressed patients as well as the response to antiviral treatment. To date, direct antigen detection and molecular techniques have largely replaced traditional culture-based techniques for CMV quantitation. In general, a high systemic CMV load is correlated with CMV disease. This correlation is strong in the HIV-infected population and in solid-organ transplant recipients but less clear in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients. Measuring the viral load at specific anatomic sites may be an alternative way to assess disease activity in situations where the systemic viral load correlates poorly with disease activity. A reduction of the systemic CMV load also correlates with a response to antiviral treatment, but more research is needed to evaluate the role of viral load as a surrogate marker for drug resistance. Due to the widespread use of quantitative CMV detection techniques to direct and monitor antiviral treatment, there is a great need for an assessment of the reproducibility of test results and better standardization of the assays.