Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococci with the VITEK 2 system

Detection of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci by the Vitek 2 system

The accurate performance of the Vitek 2 GP67 card for detecting methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is not known. We prospectively determined the ability of the Vitek 2 GP67 card to accurately detect methicillin-resistant CoNS, with mecA PCR results used as the gold standard for a 4-month period in 2012. Included in the study were 240 consecutively collected nonduplicate CoNS isolates. Cefoxitin susceptibility by disk diffusion testing was determined for all isolates. We found that the three tested systems, Vitek 2 oxacillin and cefoxitin testing and cefoxitin disk susceptibility testing, lacked specificity and, in some cases, sensitivity for detecting methicillin resistance. The Vitek 2 oxacillin and cefoxitin tests had very major error rates of 4% and 8%, respectively, and major error rates of 38% and 26%, respectively. Disk cefoxitin testing gave the best performance, with very major and major error rates of 2% and 24%, respectively. The test performances were species dependent, with the greatest errors found for Staphylococcus saprophyticus. While the 2014 CLSI guidelines recommend reporting isolates that test resistant by the oxacillin MIC or cefoxitin disk test as oxacillin resistant, following such guidelines produces erroneous results, depending on the test method and bacterial species tested. Vitek 2 cefoxitin testing is not an adequate substitute for cefoxitin disk testing. For critical-source isolates, mecA PCR, rather than Vitek 2 or cefoxitin disk testing, is required for optimal antimicrobial therapy.

Adjunctive mecA PCR for routine detection of methicillin susceptibility in clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci

Concerns over the reliability of routine sensitivity testing in coagulase-negative staphylococci often lead to the use of potentially less-effective antibiotics as few laboratories have access to routine tests for the mecA resistance gene. Although previous studies have shown a reasonable correlation between oxacillin disc and automated sensitivity testing, changing epidemiology and methodology dictate periodic reappraisal of these methods. In the present study, we evaluated two real-time PCR assays against novel targets in the mecA gene as an adjunct to routine susceptibility testing using the Vitek II AST-P620 card. All samples were further examined for the presence of the mecC gene. Of 118 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci tested, 81 were oxacillin resistant and 37 oxacillin susceptible by the Vitek II assay compared with 103 positive and 15 negative by mecA PCR. In-house PCR results correlated well with a previously published reference PCR, though little correlation was found between mecA PCR or Vitek II and PBP 2a latex agglutination. Incubation conditions may have affected the accuracy of the latter test. None of the strains tested were mecC PCR positive. The inclusion of dual-target PCRs in the testing algorithm was inexpensive and offered the safest strategy for determining beta-lactam susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci in our laboratory.

[Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolated from urine culture in outpatients: epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility (Label Bio Elbeuf study - November 2007-July 2009)]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the distribution and the antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus saprophyticus patterns isolated from urine culture in outpatients (population: 57,000, Elbeuf, Normandie, France).

DESIGN

Prospective study from November 2007 to October 2009 in collaboration with three private medical laboratories. Determination of susceptibility to oxacillin by disk diffusion (cefoxitin, and moxalactam), automated method (Vitek BioMérieux 2) and mecA PCR's detection. Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration by microbroth dilution for other antibiotics.

RESULTS

Five thousand and fifty-one bacterial strains isolated, 91 strains of S. saprophyticus (1.8%), 89 in women (2.25%) and two in men (0.18%). S. saprophyticus represented 10.3% and 14.5% of isolates (women respectively aged between 11 and 30; 16 and 20 years); S. saprophyticus is isolated less frequently in winter. mecA PCR detection was positive for two strains. All strains tested were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and furans. Only one strain is resistant to cotrimoxazole.

CONCLUSIONS

S. saprophyticus is found mostly in women between 11 to 30 years. Cotrimoxazole (after susceptibility testing) is efficient in case of S. saprophyticus's cystitis. Furans (probabilistic treatment) have to be reevaluated because of the potential for serious adverse effects.

Direct mecA polymerase chain reaction testing of blood culture bottles growing Gram-positive cocci and the clinical potential in optimizing antibiotic therapy for staphylococcal bacteremia

This study evaluated the performance of direct mecA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from blood culture bottles growing Gram-positive cocci in clusters and its role in optimization of antibiotic therapy. A total of 266 blood cultures including 121 methicillin-resistant and 122 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococci were tested for mecA. Compared to phenotypic testing, the overall performance of direct mecA PCR was 99% for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively. Assessment of antibiotic therapy upon microbiology reporting of direct mecA PCR results from 38 patients prior to (phase I) and 48 patients after implementation of testing and reporting (phase II) showed that the mean time to antibiotic optimization in phase II (0.9 ± 0.9 day) was significantly shorter than that in phase I (2.2 ± 3.2 days) (P < 0.05). Methicillin-susceptible staphylococcal bacteremias had significantly higher frequency of antibiotic adjustment upon direct mecA reporting, compared to methicillin-resistant staphylococcal bacteremias. Our study indicated that direct mecA PCR improved timely antibiotic optimization.

Expert systems in clinical microbiology

This review aims to discuss expert systems in general and how they may be used in medicine as a whole and clinical microbiology in particular (with the aid of interpretive reading). It considers rule-based systems, pattern-based systems, and data mining and introduces neural nets. A variety of noncommercial systems is described, and the central role played by the EUCAST is stressed. The need for expert rules in the environment of reset EUCAST breakpoints is also questioned. Commercial automated systems with on-board expert systems are considered, with emphasis being placed on the "big three": Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, and MicroScan. By necessity and in places, the review becomes a general review of automated system performances for the detection of specific resistance mechanisms rather than focusing solely on expert systems. Published performance evaluations of each system are drawn together and commented on critically.

[Evaluation of methods for studying susceptibility to oxacillin and penicillin in 60 Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates]

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus associated with a variety of clinical infections. In this paper we present the results of a comparative study using 4 methods to determine antimicrobial susceptibility to oxacillin and penicillin in 60 S. lugdunensis isolates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 60 S. lugdunensis isolates obtained from clinical specimens sent to our laboratory over an 8-year period. All isolates were free coagulase-negative and DNase-negative, and biochemically identified by API ID 32 STAPH (bioMérieux). Presence of mecA and ss-lactamase production were studied in all cases. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the Vitek 2 System (bioMérieux) and broth microdilution (Wider) (Soria Melguizo) for penicillin and oxacillin, and the E-test (AB Biodisk) and cefoxitin disk diffusion test (BD BBLTM) for oxacillin.

RESULTS

All isolates lacked the mecA gene and were susceptible to oxacillin by broth microdilution, E-test, and cefoxitin disk diffusion test. Only two isolates were oxacillin-resistant by the Vitek 2 System. Twenty-four isolates (40%) were ss-lactamase-positive, 4 after induction. Susceptibility testing to penicillin determined that 48 isolates showed concordance between the results obtained by broth microdilution and Vitek 2, but 12 isolates (20%), showed divergent results.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected no resistance to oxacillin in S. lugdunensis. All the methods evaluated were adequate for determining oxacillin resistance. The Vitek 2 System is useful for detecting penicillin resistance, but the ss-lactamase test should be applied to isolates with a MIC=0.25microg/ml to avoid the interpretation of false resistance to this antibiotic.

Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or protein factors in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from prosthetic hip and knee joint infections

Nosocomial staphylococcal foreign-body infections related to biofilm formation are a serious threat, demanding new therapeutic and preventive strategies. As the use of biofilm-associated factors as vaccines is critically restricted by their prevalence in natural staphylococcal populations we studied the distribution of genes involved in biofilm formation, the biofilm phenotype and production of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) in clonally independent Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from prosthetic joint infections after total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Biofilm formation was detected in all S. aureus and 69.2% of S. epidermidis strains. Importantly, 27% of biofilm-positive S. epidermidis produced PIA-independent biofilms, in part mediated by the accumulation associated protein (Aap). Protein-dependent biofilms were exclusively found in S. epidermidis strains from total hip arthroplasty (THA). In S. aureus PIA and proteins act cooperatively in biofilm formation regardless of the infection site. PIA and protein factors like Aap are of differential importance for the pathogenesis of S. epidermidis in prosthetic joint infections (PJI) after THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), implicating that icaADBC cannot serve as a general virulence marker in this species. In S. aureus biofilm formation proteins are of overall importance and future work should focus on the identification of functionally active molecules.

Evaluation of a rapid direct assay for identification of bacteria and the mec A and van genes from positive-testing blood cultures

We performed the first evaluation of a DNA strip assay (GenoType blood culture; Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) for the detection of the most relevant bacterial sepsis pathogens directly from positive BACTEC blood culture bottles (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). The test comprises two panels, one for the direct species identification of important gram-positive cocci and the other for gram-negative rods. Additionally, detection of the mec A and the van genes are implemented. The GenoType assay was validated regarding its analytical sensitivity with blood cultures spiked with reference strains. Approximately 10(4) CFU per ml were detected. Analytical specificity was calculated with a test panel of 212 reference strains. Of the strains tested, 99% were correctly identified. Additionally, 279 consecutive blood cultures signaled positive by BACTEC were processed directly, in comparison to conventional methods. The GenoType assays were performed according to Gram stain morphology. A total of 243 (87.1%) of the 279 organisms isolated were covered by specific probes. A total of 152 organisms were gram-positive cocci, of which 148 (97.4%) were correctly identified by the GenoType assay. Ninety-one organisms were gram-negative rods, of which 89 (97.8%) were correctly identified. Concerning mec A gene detection, GenoType assay correctly detected 12 of 13 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. One Enterococcus faecium isolate with a positive van A gene isolated was correctly differentiated by the assay. All results were available 4 h after the results of microscopic analysis. The evaluated GenoType blood culture assay showed fast and reliable results in detecting the most important sepsis pathogens and the mec A and van genes directly from positive blood culture bottles.

Genotypic versus phenotypic characterization, with respect to susceptibility and identification, of 17 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis

OBJECTIVES

To compare different methods for the identification and determination of susceptibility to penicillin and methicillin of Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

METHODS

Seventeen clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis (identified by PCR amplification and sequencing of the rpoB gene) were studied using the ATB32-Staph, Crystal, Vitek 2 and Wider commercial systems. The clumping factor test and the tube coagulase test were also performed. Beta-lactamase production was studied by chromogenic methods. Methicillin resistance was phenotypically studied by the MRSA slide latex agglutination test, growth in MRSA agar, and the Vitek 2 and Wider systems (based on oxacillin MIC), and genotypically studied by detection of the mecA gene by PCR.

RESULTS

The clumping factor test was negative in 35.3% of strains. All isolates were correctly identified to species level by the ATB32-Staph system. Species misidentification rates were 5.9%, 23.5% and 29.4% with the Crystal, the Vitek 2 and the Wider systems, respectively, mostly as Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Beta-lactamase was present in 11.8% of strains. Whereas 76.5% and 47.1% of strains exhibited oxacillin resistance (MIC range 0.5-2 mg/L) by the Vitek 2 system and the Wider system, respectively, none of the strains was positive in the MRSA slide latex agglutination test or grew in MRSA agar. All strains lacked the mecA gene.

CONCLUSIONS

The clumping factor test and some commercial systems may misidentify S. lugdunensis. Oxacillin resistance detected by commercial systems is not indicative of the presence of the mecA gene. These facts, together with beta-lactamase production, may preclude adequate treatment of infections by this virulent coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

Evaluation of the BD PHOENIX automated microbiology system for detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci

The new BD PHOENIX automated microbiology system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.) is designed for automated rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing and identification of clinically relevant bacteria. In our study, the accuracy and speed of the BD PHOENIX oxacillin MIC determination for detecting methicillin resistance was evaluated for 200 clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Compared to mecA PCR, the BD PHOENIX system detected methicillin resistance with a sensitivity of 99.2%. According to the actual NCCLS oxacillin MIC breakpoint of > or =0.5 microg/ml, the specificity was only 64.9%, attributable to false-positive results in 26 mecA-negative strains, including 16 non-Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. Alternative oxacillin breakpoints of > or =1, > or =2, and > or =4 microg/ml resulted in increased specificities of 83.8, 94.6, and 100% and high sensitivities of 99.2, 99.2, and 96.7%, respectively. Similarly, NCCLS broth microdilution oxacillin MICs exhibited a sensitivity of 100% but a low degree of specificity. However, the previous oxacillin MIC breakpoint of > or =4 microg/ml performed with a sensitivity of 98.4% and a specificity of 98.7%. BD PHOENIX oxacillin MIC results were available after 9 h for 40.5% of the examined CoNS strains and were completed after 17 h. Our results revealed the high reliability of the BD PHOENIX system as a phenotypic method for detection of resistance to oxacillin in mecA-positive CoNS. However, for the improvement of specificity, reevaluation of the optimal oxacillin MIC breakpoint for CoNS appears to be necessary.

Identification of methicillin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci responsible for bloodstream infections with the Phoenix™ system

We evaluated the reliability of the new Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, Md.) in species-level identification and detection of oxacillin (methicillin) resistance among 493 staphylococcal isolates (Staphylococcus aureus, n = 223; coagulase-negative staphylococci, CoNS, n = 270) recovered from patients with bacteremia. Identification results were concordant with those of the ID 32 STAPH system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) for 100% of S. aureus (223/223) and 97.4% (263/270) of CoNS isolates. For S. aureus isolates, Phoenix oxacillin-susceptibility results fully concurred with those of mecA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (reference method): 96 mecA-positive isolates identified as resistant, 127 mecA-negative strains as susceptible. Two of the 210 mecA-positive CoNS isolates were misclassified as susceptible by the Phoenix (sensitivity 99%, positive predictive value 97.6%). Five of 60 mecA-negative CoNS isolates were classified as resistant by the Phoenix (specificity 91.7%; negative predictive value 96.5%). The Phoenix system can provide accurate and reliable identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci responsible for bloodstream infections.