Multiple initiation of bacteriophage T4 DNA replication: delaying effect of bromodeoxyuridine

A method for evaluating the host range of bacteriophages using phages fluorescently labeled with 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU)

The evaluation of bacteriophage (phage) host range is a significant issue in understanding phage and prokaryotic community interactions. However, in conventional methods, such as plaque assay, target host strains must be isolated, although almost all environmental prokaryotes are recalcitrant to cultivation. Here, we introduce a novel phage host range evaluation method using fluorescently labeled phages (the FLP method), which consists of the following four steps: (i) Fluorescently labeled phages are added to a microbial consortium, and host cells are infected and fluorescently labeled. (ii) Fluorescent cells are sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (iii) 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from sorted cells are analyzed, and specific oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are designed. (iv) Cells labeled with both fluorescently labeled phage and FISH probe are identified as host cells. To verify the feasibility of this method, we used T4 phage and Escherichia coli as a model. We first used nucleic acid stain reagents for phage labeling; however, the reagents also stained non-host cells. Next, we employed the Click-iT EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine) assay kit from Invitrogen for phage labeling. Using EdU-labeled T4 phage, we could specifically detect E. coli cells in a complex microbial consortium from municipal sewage. We also confirmed that FISH could be applied to the infected E. coli cells. These results suggest that this FLP method using the EdU assay kit is a useful method for evaluating phage host range and may have a potential application for various types of phages, even if their prokaryotic hosts are currently unculturable.

Early intermediates in bacteriophage T4 DNA replication and recombination

We investigated, by density gradients and subsequent electron microscopy, vegetative T4 DNA after single or multiple infection of Escherichia coli with wild-type T4. Our results can be summarized as follows. (i) After single infection (i.e., when early intermolecular recombination could not occur), most, if not all, T4 DNA molecules initiated the first round of replication with a single loop. (ii) After multiple infection, recombinational intermediates containing label from both parents first appeared as early as 1 min after the onset of replication, long before all parental DNA molecules had finished their first round and before secondary replication was detectable. (iii) At the same time, in multiple infections only, complex, highly branched concatemeric T4 DNA first appeared. (iv) Molecules in which two loops or several branches were arranged in tandem were only found after multiple infections. (v) Secondary loops within primary loops were seen after both single and multiple infections, but they were rare and many appeared off center. Thus, recombination in wild-type T4-infected cells occurred very early, and the generation of multiple tandem loops or branches in vegetative T4 DNA depended on recombination. These results are consistent with the previous finding (A. Luder and G. Mosig, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79:1101-1105, 1982) that most secondary growing points of T4 are not initiated from origin sequences but from recombinational intermediates. By these and previous results, the various DNA molecules that we observed are most readily explained as intermediates in DNA replication and recombination according to a model proposed earlier to explain various other aspects of T4 DNA metabolism (Mosig et al., p. 277-295, in D. Ray, ed., The Initiation of DNA Replication, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1981).

Partial replication of UV-irradiated T4 bacteriophage DNA results in amplification of specific genetic areas

Upon infection of Escherichia coli with bromodeoxyuridine-labeled t4 phage that had received 10 lethal hits of UV irradiation, a sizable amount of phage DNA was synthesized (approximately 36 phage equivalent units of DNA per infected bacterium), although very little multiplicity reactivation occurs. This progeny DNA was isolated and analyzed. This DNA was biased in its genetic representation, as shown by hybridization to cloned segments of the T4 genome immobilized on nitrocellulose filters. Preferentially amplified areas corresponded to regions containing origins of T4 DNA replication. The size of the progeny DNA increased with time after infection, possibly due to recombination between partial replicas and nonreplicated subunits or due to the gradual overcoming of the UV damage. As the size of the progeny DNA increased, all of the genes were more equally represented, resulting in a decrease in the genetic bias. Amplification of specific genetic areas was also observed upon infection with UV-irradiated, nonbromodeoxyuridine-substituted (light) phage. However, the genetic bias observed in this case was not as great as that observed with bromodeoxyuridine-substituted phage. This is most likely due to the higher efficiency of multiplicity reactivation of the light phage.

Replication process of the parvovirus H-1. III. Factors affecting H-1 RF DNA synthesis

Replication of the single-stranded DNA parvovirus H-1 involves the synthesis of a double-stranded DNA replicative form (RF). In this study, the metabolism of RF DNA was examined in parasynchronous hamster embryo cells. The initiation of RF DNA replication was found to occur late in S phase, as was the synthesis of the DNA upon which subsequent viral hemagglutinin synthesis is dependent. Evidence is presented which indicates that initiation of RF replication requires proteins synthesized in late S phase, but that concomittant protein synthesis is not required for the continuation of RF replication. The data also suggest a requirement for viral protein(s) for progeny strand synthesis. Incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BUdR) into viral DNA resulted in an "all-or-none" inhibition of viral hemagglutinin and viral antigen synthesis. BUdR inactivation of viral protein function was used to explore the time of synthesis of viral DNA serving as template for viral RNA synthesis and the effect of viral protein on RF replication and progeny strand synthesis. Results of this study suggest that parental RF DNA is synthesized shortly after infection, and that viral mRNA is transcribed from only a few copies of the viral genome in each cell. They also support the conclusion that viral protein is inhibitory to RF DNA replication. Density labeling of RF DNA with BUdR, allowing separation of viral strand DNA (V) from viral complementary strand (C), provided additional data in support of the above findings.