Alternative promoters in the development of bacteriophage plasmid P4

Structural insight into DNA binding and oligomerization of the multifunctional Cox protein of bacteriophage P2

The Cox protein from bacteriophage P2 is a small multifunctional DNA-binding protein. It is involved in site-specific recombination leading to P2 prophage excision and functions as a transcriptional repressor of the P2 Pc promoter. Furthermore, it transcriptionally activates the unrelated, defective prophage P4 that depends on phage P2 late gene products for lytic growth. In this article, we have investigated the structural determinants to understand how P2 Cox performs these different functions. We have solved the structure of P2 Cox to 2.4 Å resolution. Interestingly, P2 Cox crystallized in a continuous oligomeric spiral with its DNA-binding helix and wing positioned outwards. The extended C-terminal part of P2 Cox is largely responsible for the oligomerization in the structure. The spacing between the repeating DNA-binding elements along the helical P2 Cox filament is consistent with DNA binding along the filament. Functional analyses of alanine mutants in P2 Cox argue for the importance of key residues for protein function. We here present the first structure from the Cox protein family and, together with previous biochemical observations, propose that P2 Cox achieves its various functions by specific binding of DNA while wrapping the DNA around its helical oligomer.

Pirates of the Caudovirales

Molecular piracy is a biological phenomenon in which one replicon (the pirate) uses the structural proteins encoded by another replicon (the helper) to package its own genome and thus allow its propagation and spread. Such piracy is dependent on a complex web of interactions between the helper and the pirate that occur at several levels, from transcriptional control to macromolecular assembly. The best characterized examples of molecular piracy are from the E. coli P2/P4 system and the S. aureus SaPI pathogenicity island/helper system. In both of these cases, the pirate element is mobilized and packaged into phage-like transducing particles assembled from proteins supplied by a helper phage that belongs to the Caudovirales order of viruses (tailed, dsDNA bacteriophages). In this review we will summarize and compare the processes that are involved in molecular piracy in these two systems.

Transcription-termination-mediated immunity and its prevention in bacteriophage SfV of Shigella flexneri

The temperate phage SfV encodes the genes responsible for the serotype conversion of Shigella flexneri strains from serotype Y to 5a. Bacteriophages often encode proteins that prevent subsequent infection by homologous phages; the mechanism by which this is accomplished is referred to as superinfection immunity. The serotype conversion mediated following lysogenization of SfV is one such mechanism. Another mechanism is the putative lambda-like CI protein within SfV. This study reports the characterization of a third superinfection mechanism, transcription termination, in SfV. The presence of a small immunity-mediating RNA molecule, called CI RNA, and its essential role in the establishment of immunity, is shown. The novel role of the gene orf77, located immediately downstream from the transcription termination region, in inhibiting the establishment of CI RNA-mediated immunity is also presented.

Bacteriophage P4 sut1: a mutation suppressing transcription termination

In the Escherichia coli satellite phage P4, transcription starting from PLE is prevalently controlled via premature termination at several termination sites. We identified a spontaneous mutation, P4 sut1 (suppression of termination), in the natural stop codon of P4 orf151 that, by elongating translation, suppresses transcription termination at the downstream t151 site. Both the translational and the transcriptional profile of P4 sut1 differed from those of P4 wild-type. First of all, P4 sut1 did not express Orf151, but a higher molecular mass protein, compatible with the 303 codon open reading frame generated by the fusion of orf151, cnr and the intervening 138 nt. Moreover, after infection of E. coli, the mutant expressed a very low amount of the 1.3 and 1.7 kb transcripts originating at PLE and PLL promoters, respectively, and terminating at the intracistronic t151 site, whereas correspondingly higher amounts of the 4.1 and 4.5 kb RNAs arising from the same promoters and covering the entire operon were detected. Thus the sut1 mutation converts a natural stop codon into a sense codon, suppresses a natural intracistronic termination site and leads to overexpression of the downstream cnr and α genes. This correlates with the inability of P4 sut1 to propagate in the plasmid state. By cloning different P4 DNA fragments, we mapped the t151 transcription termination site within the 7633–7361 region between orf151 and gene cnr. A potential stem–loop structure, resembling the structure of a Rho-independent termination site, was predicted by mfold sequence analysis at 7414–7385.

Bacteriophage P4 Vis protein is needed for prophage excision

Upon infection of its host Escherichia coli, satellite bacteriophage P4 can integrate its genome into the bacterial chromosome by Int-mediated site-specific recombination between the attP and the attB sites. The opposite event, excision, may either occur spontaneously or be induced by a superinfecting P2 helper phage. In this work, we demonstrate that the product of the P4 vis gene, a regulator of the P4 late promoters P(LL) and P(sid), is needed for prophage excision. This conclusion is supported by the following evidence: (i) P4 mutants carrying either a frameshift mutation or a deletion of the vis gene were unable to excise both spontaneously or upon P2 phage superinfection; (ii) expression of the Vis protein from a plasmid induced P4 prophage excision; (iii) excision depended on a functional integrase (Int) protein, thus suggesting that Vis is involved in the formation of the excision complex, rather than in the excision recombination event per se; (iv) Vis protein bound P4 DNA in the attP region at two distinct boxes (Box I and Box II), located between the int gene and the attP core region, and caused bending of the bound DNA. Furthermore, we mapped by primer extension the 5' end of the int transcript and found that ectopic expression of Vis reduced its signal intensity, suggesting that Vis is also involved in negative regulation of the int promoter.

Identification of upstream sequences essential for activation of a bacteriophage P2 late promoter

We have carried out a mutational scan of the upstream region of the bacteriophage P2 FETUD late operon promoter, P(F), which spans an element of hyphenated dyad symmetry that is conserved among all six of the P2 and P4 late promoters. All mutants were assayed for activation by P4 delta in vivo, by using a lacZ reporter plasmid, and a subset of mutants was assayed in vitro for delta binding. The results confirm the critical role of the three complementary nucleotides in each half site of the upstream element for transcription factor binding and for activation of transcription. A trinucleotide DNA recognition site is consistent with a model in which these transcription factors bind via a zinc finger motif. The mutational scan also led to identification of the -35 region of the promoter. Introduction of a sigma(70) -35 consensus sequence resulted in increased constitutive expression, which could be further stimulated by delta. These results indicate that activator binding to the upstream region of P2 late promoters compensates in part for poor sigma(70) contacts and helps to recruit RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

Cnr interferes with dimerization of the replication protein alpha in phage-plasmid P4

DNA replication of phage-plasmid P4 in its host Escherichia coli depends on its replication protein alpha. In the plasmid state, P4 copy number is controlled by the regulator protein Cnr (copy number regulation). Mutations in alpha (alpha(cr)) that prevent regulation by Cnr cause P4 over-replication and cell death. Using the two-hybrid system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a system based on lambda immunity in E.coli for in vivo detection of protein-protein interactions, we found that (i) alpha protein interacts with Cnr, whereas alpha(cr) proteins do not; (ii) both alpha-alpha and alpha(cr)-alpha(cr) interactions occur and the interaction domain is located within the C-terminal of alpha; (iii) Cnr-Cnr interaction also occurs. Using an in vivo competition assay, we found that Cnr interferes with both alpha-alpha and alpha(cr)-alpha(cr) dimerization. Our data suggest that Cnr and alpha interact in at least two ways, which may have different functional roles in P4 replication control.

The plasmid status of satellite bacteriophage P4

P4 is a natural phasmid (phage-plasmid) that exploits different modes of propagation in its host Escherichia coli. Extracellularly, P4 is a virion, with a tailed icosahedral head, which encapsidates the 11.6-kb-long double-stranded DNA genome. After infection of the E. coli host, P4 DNA can integrate into the bacterial chromosome and be maintained in a repressed state (lysogeny). Alternatively, P4 can replicate as a free DNA molecule; this leads to either the lytic cycle or the plasmid state, depending on the presence or absence of the genome of a helper phage P2 in the E. coli host. As a phage, P4 is thus a satellite of P2 phage, depending on the helper genes for all the morphogenetic functions, whereas for all its episomal functions (integration and immunity, multicopy plasmid replication) P4 is completely autonomous from the helper. Replication of P4 DNA depends on its alpha protein, a multifunctional polypeptide that exhibits primase and helicase activity and binds specifically the P4 origin. Replication starts from a unique point, ori1, and proceeds bidirectionally in a straight theta-type mode. P4 negatively regulates the plasmid copy number at several levels. An unusual mechanism of copy number control is based on protein-protein interaction: the P4-encoded Cnr protein interacts with the alpha gene product, inhibiting its replication potential. Furthermore, expression of the replication genes cnr and alpha is regulated in a complex way that involves modulation of promoter activity by positive and negative factors and multiple mechanisms of transcription elongation-termination control. Thus, the relatively small P4 genome encodes mostly regulatory functions, required for its propagation both as an episomal element and as a temperate satellite phage. Plasmids that, like P4, propagate horizontally via a specific transduction mechanism have also been found in the Archaea. The presence of P4-like prophages or cryptic prophages often associated with accessory bacterial functions attests to the contribution of satellite phages to bacterial evolution.

The multifunctional bacteriophage P2 cox protein requires oligomerization for biological activity

The Cox protein of bacteriophage P2 is a multifunctional protein of 91 amino acids. It is directly involved in the site-specific recombination event leading to excision of P2 DNA out of the host chromosome. In this context, it functions as an architectural protein in the formation of the excisome. Cox is also a transcriptional repressor of the P2 Pc promoter, thereby ensuring lytic growth. Finally it promotes derepression of prophage P4, a nonrelated defective satellite phage, by activating the P4 P(LL) promoter that controls P4 DNA replication. In this case it binds upstream of the P(LL) promoter, which normally is activated by the P4 Delta protein. In this work we have analyzed the native form of the Cox protein in vivo, using a bacteriophage lambda cI-based oligomerization assay system, and in vitro, using gel filtration, cross-linking agents, and gel retardation assays. We found that P2 Cox has a strong oligomerization function in vivo as well as in vitro. The in vitro analysis indicates that its native form is a tetramer that can self-associate to octamers. Furthermore we show that oligomerization is necessary for the biological activity by characterizing different cox mutants and that oligomerization is mediated by the C-terminal region.

Translation of two nested genes in bacteriophage P4 controls immunity-specific transcription termination

In phage P4, transcription of the left operon may occur from both the constitutive PLE promoter and the regulated PLL promoter, about 400 nucleotides upstream of PLE. A strong Rho-dependent termination site, timm, is located downstream of both promoters. When P4 immunity is expressed, transcription starting at PLE is efficiently terminated at timm, whereas transcription from PLL is immunity insensitive and reads through timm. We report the identification of two nested genes, kil and eta, located in the P4 left operon. The P4 kil gene, which encodes a 65-amino-acid polypeptide, is the first translated gene downstream of the PLE promoter, and its expression is controlled by P4 immunity. Overexpression of kil causes cell killing. This gene is the terminal part of a longer open reading frame, eta, which begins upstream of PLE. The eta gene is expressed when transcription starts from the PLL promoter. Three likely start codons predict a size between 197 and 199 amino acids for the Eta gene product. Both kil and eta overlap the timm site. By cloning kil upstream of a tRNA reporter gene, we demonstrated that translation of the kil region prevents premature transcription termination at timm. This suggests that P4 immunity might negatively control kil translation, thus enabling transcription termination at timm. Transcription starting from PL proceeds through timm. Mutations that create nonsense codons in eta caused premature termination of transcription starting from PLL. Suppression of the nonsense mutation restored transcription readthrough at timm. Thus, termination of transcription from PLL is prevented by translation of eta.

An upstream sequence element required for NucC-dependent expression of the Serratia marcescens extracellular nuclease

The Serratia marcescens extracellular nuclease gene, nucA, is positively regulated by the product of the nucC gene. In this study, the upstream region required for NucC-dependent nuclease expression was defined by using fusions to the gene encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat). This sequence includes an element of hyphenated dyad symmetry identified previously as the binding site for the P2 Ogr family of activators. Footprint analysis confirmed that members of this family of activator proteins bind to this site, protecting a region between -76 and -59 relative to the start of transcription. The activator binding site in the nucA promoter lies one turn of the helix upstream from the corresponding sites in the P2 and P4 late promoters. The effects of deletions between the downstream end of the activator binding site and the putative -35 region are consistent with a strict helical phasing requirement for activation.

Identification of two replicons in phage-plasmid P4

DNA replication of phage-plasmid P4 proceeds bidirectionally from the ori1 site (previously named ori), but requires a second cis-acting region, crr. Replication depends on the product of the P4 alpha gene, a protein with primase and helicase activity, that binds both ori1 and crr. A negative regulator of P4 DNA replication, the Cnr protein, is required for copy number control of plasmid P4. Using a plasmid complementation test for replication, we found that two replicons, both dependent on the alpha gene product, coexist in P4. The first replicon is made by the cnr and alpha genes and the ori1 and crr sites. The second is limited to the alpha and crr region. Thus, in the absence of the ori1 region, replication can initiate at a different site. By deletion mapping, a cis-acting region, ori2, essential for replication of the alpha-crr replicon was mapped within a 270-bp fragment in the first half of the alpha gene. The ori2 site was found to be dispensable in a replicon that contains ori1. A construct that besides crr and alpha carries also the cnr gene was unable to replicate, suggesting that Cnr not only controls replication from ori1, but also silences ori2.

Derepression of prophage P2 by satellite phage P4: cloning of the P4 epsilon gene and identification of its product

Escherichia coli phage P4 lacks all of the genetic information necessary for capsid, tail, and lysis functions. P4 is therefore dependent on a helper phage, such as P2, for lytic propagation. During P4 superinfection of a P2 lysogen, the P2 prophage is derepressed by the action of the P4-encoded epsilon gene. We have cloned the epsilon gene and identified the 10-kDa E protein. The epsilon gene product is the only P4 protein required to derepress prophage P2, which leads to in situ P2 DNA replication. A two-plasmid derepression assay system has been developed to examine the derepression activity of E. The reporter plasmid contains the two face-to-face promoters, Pe and Pc, involved in the lysis-lysogeny transcriptional switch of phage P2 and the immunity repressor C. The Pe promoter is coupled to a cat reporter gene. In the construct, the C repressor is transcribed from the Pc promoter and represses the Pe promoter, which mimics the in situ-repressed P2 prophage. The E protein is supplied in trans from a compatible plasmid in which the epsilon gene is under the control of the T7 promoter. We show here that in the two-plasmid assay system, induction of the E protein derepresses the Pe promoter. The ash9 mutation, which is located upstream of the epsilon gene, enhances the E-mediated derepression of the Pe promoter. The purified E protein shows no specific DNA binding activity, and the implications of this are discussed.

Bacteriophage PSP3 and phiR73 activator proteins: analysis of promoter specificities

Transcription from the late promoters of bacteriophage P2 and its satellite phage P4 is activated by a unique class of small, zinc-binding proteins. Using plasmid expression systems, we compared activators from two P2-like (helper) phages with those encoded by two satellite phages. The helper phage activators have more activity on the P4 phage sid promoter. In contrast, the satellite phage activators function better on the four late P2 promoters and on the P4 late leftward promoter. We purified one activator encoded by a P2-like phage and an activator from a satellite phage and determined their binding sites within the P2 and P4 late promoters. Differences in activity levels correlate with binding specificities; promoters that function best with the satellite phage activators have only one activator binding site centered at -55, while the P4 sid promoter, which has more activity with helper phage activators, has a second binding site centered at -18. Surprisingly, DNase I footprinting revealed only very minor differences in promoter binding by the two activators reported here and the P4 activator reported previously. Thus, the differences in transcriptional activity are probably due to interactions between the activators and RNA polymerase, rather than interactions between the activators and DNA.

Multiple regulatory mechanisms controlling phage-plasmid P4 propagation

Bacteriophage P4 autonomous replication may result in the lytic cycle or in plasmid maintenance, depending, respectively, on the presence or absence of the helper phage P2 genome in the Escherichia coli host cell. Alternatively, P4 may lysogenize the bacterial host and be maintained in an immune-integrated condition. A key step in the choice between the lytic/plasmid vs. the lysogenic condition is the regulation of P4 alpha operon. This operon may be transcribed from two promoters, PLE and PLL, and encodes both immunity (promoter proximal) and replication (promoter distal) functions. PLE is a constitutive promoter and transcription of the downstream replication genes is regulated by transcription termination. The trans-acting immunity factor that controls premature transcription termination is a short RNA encoded in the PLE proximal part of the operon. Expression of the replication functions in the lytic/plasmid condition is achieved by activation of the PLL promoter. Transcription from PLL is insensitive to the termination mechanism that acts on transcription starting from PLE.PLL is also negatively regulated by P4 orf88, the first gene downstream of PLL. An additional control on P4 DNA replication is exerted by the P4 cnr gene product.

Purification and characterization of the bacteriophage P4 delta protein

The bacteriophage P4 delta protein is a transcriptional activator of the late genes of P4 as well as the late genes of its helpers, such as bacteriophage P2. delta was purified, using a variation of the MalE fusion system. With this method we purified two forms of delta: a fusion of MalE and delta and a unfused form. The fusion by itself is not active in vivo or in vitro, but the mixture of the fusion and the unfused delta is active in both. Using nitrocellulose filtration and gel mobility shift assays, we show that delta binds DNA, and using DNase I footprinting, we show that delta binds to sequences centered at approximately -55 in the two late promoters of P4 as well as the four late promoters of its helper P2. In addition, the P4 sid promoter contains a second delta binding site centered at -18.

Control of transcription termination by an RNA factor in bacteriophage P4 immunity: identification of the target sites

Prophage P4 immunity is elicited by a short, 69-nucleotide RNA (CI RNA) coded for within the untranslated leader region of the same operon it controls. CI RNA causes termination of transcription that starts at the promoter PLE and prevents the expression of the distal part of the operon that codes for P4 replication functions (alpha operon). In this work, we identify two sequences in the untranslated leader region of the alpha operon, seqA and seqC, that are the targets of the P4 immunity factor. seqA and seqC exhibit complementarity to a sequence internal to the CI RNA (seqB). Mutations in either seqA or seqC that alter its complementarity to seqB abolished or reduced P4 lysogenization proficiency and delayed the shutoff of the long transcripts originating from PLE that cover the entire operon. Both seqA and seqC single mutants were still sensitive to P4 prophage immunity, whereas P4 seqA seqC double mutants showed a virulent phenotype. Thus, both functional sites are necessary to establish immunity upon infection, whereas a single site appears to be sufficient to prevent lytic gene expression when immunity is established. A mutation in seqB that restored complementarity to both seqA and seqC mutations also restored premature termination of PLE transcripts, thus suggesting an important role for RNA-RNA interactions between seqB and seqA or seqC in P4 immunity.

A new gene of bacteriophage P4 that controls DNA replication

Bacteriophage P4 replication may result in either a lytic cycle or plasmid maintenance, depending on the presence or absence, respectively, of helper phase P2 genome. Bacteriophage P4 DNA replication depends on the product of gene alpha, which has origin recognition, primase, and helicase activities. An open reading frame with the coding capacity for a protein of 106 amino acids (orf106) is located upstream of the alpha gene. Genes orf106 and alpha are transcriptionally coregulated. Three amber mutations and an internal deletion (del51) were introduced into orf106. All of the amber mutations exhibited a polar effect on transcription of the downstream alpha gene. The P4 del51 mutant was slightly defective in lytic growth and could not be propagated in the plasmid state. In this latter condition, P4 DNA overreplication was observed. Overexpression of Orf106 severely inhibited P4 DNA replication, preventing P4 lytic growth and plasmid maintenance. The inhibitory effect of Orf106 on P4 replication was not observed when both orf106 and alpha were overexpressed. We suggest that orf106 is involved in P4 replication and that a balanced expression of orf106 relative to alpha may be necessary for proper P4 DNA replication. In particular, orf106 appears to be essential for the control of P4 genome replication in the plasmid state. We propose that orf106 be named cnr, for copy number regulation.

Excision of a P4-like cryptic prophage leads to Alp protease expression in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli K-12 alpA gene product, when overproduced from a multicopy plasmid, leads to suppression of the capsule overproduction and UV sensitivity phenotypes of cells mutant for the Lon ATP-dependent protease. This suppression has previously been shown to correlate with increased in vivo activity of a previously unknown energy-dependent proteolytic activity capable of degrading Lon substrates, the Alp protease. We show in an accompanying paper that alpA, which has homology to a short open reading frame in bacteriophage P4, acts as a positive transcriptional regulator of slpA, a gene linked to alpA and necessary for suppression of lon mutants (J. E. Trempy, J. E. Kirby, and S. Gottesman, J. Bacteriol. 176:2061-2067). The sequence of slpA suggests that it encodes an integrase gene closely related to P4 int and that both alpA and slpA are part of a cryptic P4-like prophage. AlpA expression increases SlpA synthesis. Increased SlpA leads, in turn, to the excision and loss of the cryptic prophage. Excision is dependent on integration host factor as well as on SlpA. Prophage excision is necessary but not sufficient for full expression of the Alp protease. A second function (named AHA) allows full protease expression; this function can be provided by the kanamycin resistance element from Tn903 when the element is present on a multicopy plasmid. Excision and loss of the cryptic prophage apparently allow expression of the Alp protease by inactivating a small stable RNA (10Sa RNA) encoded by the ssrA gene. The precursor of this RNA has its 3' end within the cryptic prophage; the mature 3' end lies within the prophage attL site. Inactivation of ssrA by insertional mutagenesis is sufficient to allow expression of the suppressing Alp protease, even in the presence of the cryptic prophage. Therefore, 10Sa RNA acts as a negative regulator of protease synthesis or activity, and prophage excision must inactivate this inhibitory function of the RNA.

Mechanisms of genome propagation and helper exploitation by satellite phage P4

Temperate coliphage P2 and satellite phage P4 have icosahedral capsids and contractile tails with side tail fibers. Because P4 requires all the capsid, tail, and lysis genes (late genes) of P2, the genomes of these phages are in constant communication during P4 development. The P4 genome (11,624 bp) and the P2 genome (33.8 kb) share homologous cos sites of 55 bp which are essential for generating 19-bp cohesive ends but are otherwise dissimilar. P4 turns on the expression of helper phage late genes by two mechanisms: derepression of P2 prophage and transactivation of P2 late-gene promoters. P4 also exploits the morphopoietic pathway of P2 by controlling the capsid size to fit its smaller genome. The P4 sid gene product is responsible for capsid size determination, and the P2 capsid gene product, gpN, is used to build both sizes. The P2 capsid contains 420 capsid protein subunits, and P4 contains 240 subunits. The size reduction appears to involve a major change of the whole hexamer complex. The P4 particles are less stable to heat inactivation, unless their capsids are coated with a P4-encoded decoration protein (the psu gene product). P4 uses a small RNA molecule as its immunity factor. Expression of P4 replication functions is prevented by premature transcription termination effected by this small RNA molecule, which contains a sequence that is complementary to a sequence in the transcript that it terminates.

Genetic analysis of the immunity region of phage-plasmid P4

In the prophage P4, expression of the early genes is prevented by premature termination of transcription from the constitutive promoter PLE. In order to identify the region coding for the immunity determinant, we cloned several fragments of P4 DNA and tested their ability to confer immunity to P4 superinfection. A 357 bp long fragment (P4 8418-8774) is sufficient to confer immunity to an infecting P4 phage and to complement the immunity-defective P4 cl405 mutant, both in the presence and in the absence of the helper phage P2. The immunity region covers PLE and the cl locus. We were unable to obtain evidence of translation of the region, thus we suggest that P4 immunity is not elicited by a protein but by a transcript (or transcripts) encoded by the region downstream of the promoter PLE. The promoter PLE appears to be necessary for the expression of P4 immunity: fragments in which the PLE region is deleted did not complement P4 cl405 for lysogenization, although they still interfered with P4 growth. Two complementary sequences downstream of PLE (seqA and seqB) at the 5' and 3' ends of the immunity region play an essential role in the control of P4 immunity.

Bacteriophage P4 immunity controlled by small RNAs via transcription termination

Satellite bacteriophage P4 immunity is encoded within a short DNA region 357 bp long containing the promoter PLE and 275 bp downstream. PLE is active both in the early post-infection phase, when genes necessary for P4 lytic cycle are transcribed from this promoter, and in the lysogenic condition, when expression of the above genes is prevented by prophage immunity. In order to understand how P4 immunity is elicited, we have characterized the transcription pattern during the establishment and the maintenance of the satellite phage P4 lysogenic condition. We found that prophage transcription starting at PLE ends prematurely and the transcripts do not extend beyond 300-400 nucleotides downstream of PLE. Thus P4 immunity acts by causing premature transcription termination rather than by repressing transcription initiation. The P4 immunity region is transcribed in the prophage, but it does not seem to be translated; this region contains two elements (seqA and seqB) of a palindromic sequence. In addition to transcripts about 300 nucleotides long, P4 prophage produces a family of shorter transcripts, about 80 nucleotides long, containing seqA or seqB. Evidence is presented suggesting that SeqB RNA is the trans-acting immunity factor, and that interaction of SeqB RNA with the complementary nascent RNA containing seqA may be involved in bringing about premature transcription termination.

Control of gene expression in the temperate coliphage 186. IX. B is the sole phage function needed to activate transcription of the phage late genes

Using plasmid clones we have determined that the late control function B is the only phage function that is needed to activate a late promoter of coliphage 186, and we predict that it functions as an auxiliary factor to RNA polymerase in the activation of late transcription. We have also shown that a high concentration of B will activate late transcription from a prophage, and we conclude that replicating DNA is not a template requirement for B to function. The original demonstration of a need for the replication gene A in late transcription can be explained by the fact that replication leads to an increase in B gene dosage, with the consequent increase in B concentration leading to the efficient activation of the late promoters.

The Psu protein of bacteriophage P4 is an antitermination factor for rho-dependent transcription termination

A 0.7-kbp DNA fragment from bacteriophage P4 that contained the polarity suppression (psu) gene was cloned in an expression plasmid. Induction of the plasmid-borne psu gene resulted in the overproduction of a protein having the biological properties of the P4-induced polarity suppressor. In vivo, Psu protein acted in trans to suppress rho-dependent polarity in the late genes of an infecting P2 phage, in plasmid operons, and in the host chromosome. Psu action did not require the presence of other P2 or P4 phage genes. Psu caused efficient readthrough (antitermination) by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the rho-dependent terminators tR1 and TIS2, individually and in tandem, but did not affect termination at rho-independent sites. Neither the conserved antitermination sequence boxA nor any unique promoter or utilization sequence was required for Psu activity.

Genetic analysis of the DNA recognition sequence of the P2 Cox protein

The Cox protein of temperate Escherichia coli phage P2 is involved in three important biological processes: (i) excision of the integrated prophage genome (G. Lindahl and M. Sunshine, Virology 49:180-187, 1972), (ii) transcriptional repression of the P2 Pc promoter, which controls the expression of the immunity repressor C and the integrase (S. Saha, E. Haggård-Ljungquist, and K. Nordström, EMBO J. 6:3191-3199, 1987), and (iii) transcriptional activation of the late PII promoter of the unrelated satellite phage P4 (S. Saha, E. Haggård-Ljungquist, and K. Nordström, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:3973-3977, 1989). A comparison of the DNA regions protected by Cox from DNaseI degradation has revealed a presumptive Cox recognition sequence (Saha et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA). The binding region of Cox in the P2 Pc promoter contains three presumptive recognition sequences, "Cox boxes," located in tandem. P2 vir3 and P2 vir24 are virulent deletion mutants unable to plate on Cox-producing strains, most likely because the deletions locate the new early promoters too close to the Cox-binding region (Saha et al., EMBO J.). In this report, spontaneous P2 vir3 and vir24 mutants, no longer sensitive to repression by the Cox protein, have been isolated. These mutants plate with equal efficiency on strains with or without a Cox-producing plasmid, and they have been named cor for cox resistance. Three types are recognized; the four P2 vir3 cor mutants have a 1-base deletion in the first Cox box, while the P2 vir24 cor mutants were of two types; four have a base substitution in the first Cox box, and one has a base substitution in the second Cox box. The effect of the Cox protein on the mutated P2 vir3 and vir24 promoters was analyzed in vivo by using fusions to a promoterless cat (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) gene. The activities of the P2 vir3 and vir24 early promoters, as opposed to the wild-type early Pe promoter, are drastically reduced by the Cox protein, and the cor mutation renders them as resistant to Cox as the wild-type Pe promoter. Thus, at least the first two Cox boxes are essential for binding of the Cox protein.

Mutational analysis of a bacteriophage P4 late promoter

Transcription from the late Psid promoter of satellite bacteriophage P4 is dependent on the bacterial RNA polymerase carrying the sigma 70 subunit and is positively regulated by the product of the P4 delta gene or the ogr gene of helper bacteriophage P2. Through deletion and mutational analyses of the Psid promoter, we identified mutations in the -10 region and in a region of hyphenated dyad symmetry centered around position -55 that inactivate Psid. Most of these mutations alter base pairs that are highly conserved in the five other delta-activated P4 and P2 late promoters. We propose that the P4 delta and P2 ogr gene products bind the -55 region of the P4 and P2 late promoters.

Deletion analysis of a bacteriophage P2 late promoter

We have fused the promoter (PF) for the P2 late FETUD operon to the gene (cat) encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) in a plasmid vector. Synthesis of CAT in Escherichia coli strains carrying this plasmid requires the product of the P2 ogr gene or the satellite phage P4 transactivation gene, delta. Our results demonstrate that these phage-encoded transcriptional regulatory proteins are necessary and sufficient for activation of P2 late transcription in this reporter plasmid. Positive regulation of cloned PF is severely impaired in a host strain carrying the rpoA109 mutation. Expression from the cloned promoter thus approximates those features of P2 late transcription that have been shown to occur during normal P2 infection. To define sequences required for promoter function, sequential upstream deletions of PF were generated using BAL 31 nuclease, and the mutant promoters were assayed for cat expression. A sequence between nucleotides -69 and -64 from the transcription start point was found to be essential for promoter activity. This coincides with a region of homology conserved among all four P2 late gene promoters and the two P4 late promoters, and includes an element of dyad symmetry.

Bacteriophage P2 ogr and P4 delta genes act independently and are essential for P4 multiplication

Satellite bacteriophage P4 requires the products of the late genes of a helper phage such as P2 for lytic growth. Expression of the P2 late genes is positively regulated by the P2 ogr gene in a process requiring P2 DNA replication. Transactivation of P2 late gene expression by P4 requires the P4 delta gene product and works even in the absence of P2 DNA replication. We have made null mutants of the P2 ogr and P4 delta genes. In the absence of the P4 delta gene product, P4 multiplication required both the P2 ogr protein and P2 DNA replication. In the absence of the P2 ogr gene product, P4 multiplication required the P4 delta protein. In complementation experiments, we found that the P2 ogr protein was made in the absence of P2 DNA replication but could not function unless P2 DNA replicated. We produced P4 delta protein from a plasmid and found that it complemented the null P4 delta and P2 ogr mutants.

A mutation of the transactivation gene of satellite bacteriophage P4 that suppresses the rpoA109 mutation of Escherichia coli

Satellite bacteriophage P4 requires the products of the late genes of a helper such as P2 in order to grow lytically. The Escherichia coli rpoA109 mutation, which alters the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase, prevents transcription of the late genes of bacteriophage P2. Suppressor mutations that define the P2 ogr gene overcome this block. We found that P4 lytic growth using a P2 ogr+ prophage helper was prevented by the rpoA109 mutation but that this block was overcome when the P2 helper carried the suppressor mutation in the ogr gene. Furthermore, we isolated and characterized four independent mutations in P4, called org, that suppress the E. coli rpoA109 mutation by allowing P4 lytic growth using a P2 ogr+ helper. DNA sequence analysis revealed that the four independent org mutations are identical and that they occur in the P4 delta gene, which codes for a factor that positively regulates the transcription of the P2 and P4 late genes. delta is predicted to code for a basic 166-amino-acid residue protein. Each 83-residue half of the predicted delta gene product is similar to the predicted 72-residue proteins encoded by the ogr gene of P2 and the B gene of phage 186.

Nonessential region of bacteriophage P4: DNA sequence, transcription, gene products, and functions

We sequenced the leftmost 2,640 base pairs of bacteriophage P4 DNA, thus completing the sequence of the 11,627-base-pair P4 genome. The newly sequenced region encodes three nonessential genes, which are called gop, beta, and cII (in order, from left to right). The gop gene product kills Escherichia coli when the beta protein is absent; the gop and beta genes are transcribed rightward from the same promoter. The cII gene is transcribed leftward to a rho-independent terminator. Mutation of this terminator creates a temperature-sensitive phenotype, presumably owing to a defect in expression of the beta gene.

Activation of prophage P4 by the P2 Cox protein and the sites of action of the Cox protein on the two phage genomes

Phage P2 induces the unrelated prophage P4. In this paper we show that this is due to the activation of the P4 late promoter PII by the P2 Cox protein. This is in contrast to the effects of Cox on P2, for which it is known from previous work that it acts as a repressor of the promoter Pc, which is responsible for expression of the immunity repressor C. The activator role of Cox was revealed by its effect on replication of P4 DNA and on the formation of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase when a promoterless cat gene was inserted downstream of the P4 PII promoter. DNase I protection studies revealed that the Cox protein binds to the repressor promoter Pc of phage P2 and to the promoter PII of phage P4. In the latter case the Cox protein binds upstream of the -35 region, in analogy to several other activators of promoters. A weak binding was found in the promoters Pe of phage P2 and Ple of phage P4. The Cox protein is a case of viral transactivation of the replication genes of one phage by a control protein of the other. However, the effects of the Cox protein are totally different in the two phages, repressive in one case and activating in the other.