Oncogenicity of human papillomavirus- or adenovirus-transformed cells correlates with resistance to lysis by natural killer cells

The interaction of adenovirus E1A with p300 family members modulates cellular gene expression to reduce tumorigenicity

The use of adenovirus serotype 2 or 5 (Ad2/5) E1A as therapy for human malignancy requires an understanding of the mechanisms involved in E1A-induced tumor suppression. The prevailing use of E1A in the treatment of human malignancy stresses the non-immunologically mediated, anti-tumorigenic activities of E1A. However, the capacity of E1A to elicit a NK-cell and T-cell anti-tumor immune response and to sensitize tumor cells to lysis by immune effector molecules utilized by NK cells and T cells is also an important component of the anti-tumorigenic activity of E1A. This immune-mediated anti-tumorigenic activity of E1A is not shared by functionally similar viral oncoproteins such as the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E7 oncoprotein and is dependent on the capacity of E1A to interact with transcriptional coadapter, p300. To further define the molecular mechanisms whereby E1A reduces tumorigenicity, we compared total cellular gene expression in H4 cells, a human fibrosarcoma cell line, to gene expression in H4 cells stably expressing E1A, E7, or mutant forms of E1A that do not bind p300. The expression of E1A, but not E7, in H4 cells modulated the expression of cellular genes that may promote apoptosis, enhance immunogenicity and reduce tumor cell metastasis. The difference in the ability of E1A and E7 to modulate the expression of cellular genes that may influence tumorigenicity was largely attributable to distinct interactions of E1A and E7 with p300. Results of this study will be useful in designing novel strategies to augment the anti-tumorigenic activities of E1A.

Macrophages kill human papillomavirus type 16 E6-expressing tumor cells by tumor necrosis factor alpha- and nitric oxide-dependent mechanisms

The expression of adenovirus serotype 2 or 5 (Ad2/5) E1A sensitizes cells to killing by NK cells and activated macrophages, a property that correlates with the ability of E1A to bind the transcriptional coadaptor proteins p300-CBP. The E6 oncoproteins derived from the high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) interact with p300 and can complement mutant forms of E1A that cannot interact with p300 to induce cellular immortalization. Therefore, we determined if HPV type 16 (HPV16) E6 could sensitize cells to killing by macrophages and NK cells. HPV16 E6 expression sensitized human (H4 and C33A) and murine (MCA-102) cell lines to lysis by macrophages but not by NK cells. The lysis of cells that expressed E6 by macrophages was p53 independent but dependent on the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) or nitric oxide (NO) by macrophages. Unlike cytolysis assays with macrophages, E6 expression did not significantly sensitize cells to lysis by the direct addition of NO or TNF-alpha. Like E1A, E6 has been reported to sensitize cells to lysis by TNF-alpha by inhibiting the TNF-alpha-induced activation of NF-kappaB. We found that E1A, but not E6, blocked the TNF-alpha-induced activation of NF-kappaB, an activity that correlated with E1A-p300 binding. In summary, Ad5 E1A and HPV16 E6 sensitized cells to lysis by macrophages. Unlike E1A, E6 did not block the ability of TNF-alpha to activate NF-kappaB or sensitize cells to lysis by NK cells, TNF-alpha, or NO. Thus, there appears to be a spectrum of common and unique biological activities that result as a consequence of the interaction of E6 or E1A with p300-CBP.

Expression of an E1A/E7 chimeric protein sensitizes tumor cells to killing by activated macrophages but not NK cells

Adenovirus (Ad) E1A and human papillomavirus (HPV) E7 express homologous conserved regions (CRs) that mediate their shared biological functions. Despite their similarities, the expression of E1A sensitizes tumor cells to killing by NK cells and macrophages but the expression of E7 does not, a factor that may contribute to the dissimilar oncogenicities of Ad and HPV. This study was undertaken to define molecular differences between E1A and E7 that are responsible for the ability of E1A and the inability of E7 to sensitize cells to killing by NK cells and macrophages. Genetic mapping studies using human fibrosarcoma cells (H4) that stably expressed mutant forms of E1A showed that only those forms of E1A that interacted with the transcriptional coadaptor protein p300 sensitized cells to killing by NK cells and macrophages. E7 lacks the N-terminal p300-binding region present in E1A. Therefore, a chimeric E1A/E7 gene was constructed that included the N terminus and the CR1 (p300-binding) domain of E1A fused to CR2 and the C-terminal sequences of E7. The E1A/E7 protein interacted with p300 and pRb and immortalized primary mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF). The expression of E1A/E7 sensitized H4 and MEF cells to killing by activated macrophages but not to killing by NK cells. Therefore, N-terminal differences between E1A and E7 that map to the E1A-p300 binding region accounted for differences in their abilities to sensitize cells to killing by macrophages. However, regions in addition to the E1A-p300 binding region are required to sensitize cells to killing by NK cells.

Adenovirus E1A, not human papillomavirus E7, sensitizes tumor cells to lysis by macrophages through nitric oxide- and TNF-alpha-dependent mechanisms despite up-regulation of 70-kDa heat shock protein

Expression of adenovirus (Ad) serotype 2 or 5 (Ad2/5) E1A or human papillomavirus (HPV)16 E7 reportedly sensitizes cells to lysis by macrophages. Macrophages possess several mechanisms to kill tumor cells including TNF-alpha, NO, reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI), and Fas ligand (FasL). E1A sensitizes cells to apoptosis by TNF-alpha, and macrophages kill E1A-expressing cells, in part through the elaboration of TNF-alpha. However, E1A also up-regulates the expression of 70-kDa heat shock protein, a protein that inhibits killing by TNF-alpha and NO, thereby protecting cells from lysis by macrophages. Unlike E1A, E7 does not sensitize cells to killing by TNF-alpha, and the effector mechanism(s) used by macrophages to kill E7-expressing cells remain undefined. The purpose of this study was to further define the capacity of and the effector mechanisms used by macrophages to kill tumor cells that express Ad5 E1A or HPV16 E7. We found that Ad5 E1A, but not HPV16 E7, sensitized tumor cells to lysis by macrophages. Using macrophages derived from mice unable to make TNF-alpha, NO, ROI, or FasL, we determined that macrophages used NO, and to a lesser extent TNF-alpha, but not FasL or ROI, to kill E1A-expressing cells. Through the use of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine, which releases NO upon exposure to an aqueous environment, E1A was shown to directly sensitize tumor cells to NO-induced death. E1A sensitized tumor cells to lysis by macrophages despite up-regulating the expression of 70-kDa heat shock protein. In summary, E1A, but not E7, sensitized tumor cells to lysis by macrophages. Macrophages killed E1A-expressing cells through NO- and TNF-alpha-dependent mechanisms.

Role of the E1A Rb-binding domain in repression of the NF-kappa B-dependent defense against tumor necrosis factor-alpha

The adenoviral E1A oncogene sensitizes mammalian cells to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), in part by repressing the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B)-dependent defense against this cytokine. Other E1A activities involve binding to either p300/cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CBP) or retinoblastoma (Rb)-family proteins, but the roles of E1A interactions with these transcriptional regulators in sensitizing cells to TNF-alpha are unclear. E1A expression did not block upstream events in TNF-alpha-induced activation of NF-kappa B in NIH 3T3 cells, including degradation of I kappa B-alpha, nuclear translocation of NF-kappa B subunits, and their dimeric binding to kappa B sequences in the nucleus. However, E1A markedly repressed NF-kappa B-dependent transcription and sensitized cells to TNF-alpha induced apoptosis. These E1A effects were selective for kappa B-dependent transcription and for the function of the NF-kappa B p65/RelA subunit. A four amino acid E1A deletion that eliminates binding to Rb-family proteins blocked both repression of TNF-alpha-induced transcription and sensitization to apoptosis. In contrast, mutations that eliminate E1A binding to p300/CBP (coactivators of p65/RelA) did not affect either E1A activity. These data suggest that E1A-Rb-binding blocks the NF-kappa B-dependent activation response to TNF-alpha by altering the function of p65/RelA at a stage after formation of the transcription factor-enhancer complex. These observations also open questions about the general role of Rb-family proteins in modulation of NF-kappa B-dependent transcription.

Dissimilar immunogenicities of human papillomavirus E7 and adenovirus E1A proteins influence primary tumor development

Although human papillomaviruses (HPV) and adenoviruses (Ad) both transform cells by expressing functionally related oncogenes (Ad-E1A/E1B; HPV-E7/E6), only HPV are oncogenic in humans. Prior studies have shown that HPV-transformed cells are resistant to NK cell lysis and E7- and E6-specific CTL are inefficiently generated in women with HPV-induced cervical cancer. Therefore, we postulated that the dissimilar oncogenicities of Ad and HPV may be caused by a protective NK and T cell response that is triggered by transformed cells expressing E1A, but not by E7. To test this hypothesis, mice that were either immunologically intact, lacked T cells, or lacked both NK and T cells were challenged with Ad serotype 5 (Ad5)-E1A- or HPV16-E7-transfected tumor cells. E7-expressing tumor cells were resistant to NK cell lysis in vitro and failed to elicit a measurable anti-tumor NK or T cell response in vivo. The concomitant expression of E6 did not change this phenotype. In contrast, E1A-expressing tumor cells were sensitive to NK lysis in vitro and triggered a protective NK and T cell immune response in vivo. These data suggest differences in the capacities of E1A or E7 oncoproteins to trigger protective anti-tumor immune responses may contribute to the dissimilar oncogenicities of Ad and HPV in humans.

Impaired angiogenic balance and suppression of tumorigenicity in HeLa cells chronically exposed to interferon-alpha

We have previously reported that IFNalpha-chronic treatment for 41 days induced a partial phenotype reversion on HeLa cells along with a down-regulation of HPV18 mRNA levels. However, tumorigenicity of these cells in nude mice was unchanged. Interestingly, after 1 year of IFNalpha-chronic exposition, HeLa cells failed to induce s.c. tumors when injected into nude mice. In such experimental conditions both HPV18 DNA integration pattern and viral DNA copy number present in HeLa cells remained intact in the nontumorigenic phenotype cells. As result of the treatment with IFNalpha, HeLa cells rendered more resistant to lysis mediated by activated natural killer cells in vitro. Furthermore, IFNalpha-chronic treatment was able to induce VEGF and decrease bFGF mRNA expression, suggesting a potential effect on the angiogenic behavior of these tumoral cells. Thus, long-term treatment of HeLa cells with IFNalpha can accomplish a reversion of the malignant phenotype by a sequential multistep mechanism, in which the antiangiogenic effect of IFNalpha could be one of the contributing events.