Interaction of the Human Papillomavirus E1 Helicase with UAF1-USP1 Promotes Unidirectional Theta Replication of Viral Genomes

Human papillomavirus associated cervical lesion: pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted virus globally. Persistent high-risk HPV infection can result in cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with 70% of cervical cancer cases associated with high-risk types HPV16 and 18. HPV infection imposes a significant financial and psychological burden. Therefore, studying methods to eradicate HPV infection and halt the progression of precancerous lesions remains crucial. This review comprehensively explores the mechanisms underlying HPV-related cervical lesions, including the viral life cycle, immune factors, epithelial cell malignant transformation, and host and environmental contributing factors. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive overview of treatment methods for HPV-related cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer. Our focus is on immunotherapy, encompassing HPV therapeutic vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and advanced adoptive T cell therapy. Furthermore, we summarize the commonly employed drugs and other nonsurgical treatments currently utilized in clinical practice for managing HPV infection and associated cervical lesions. Gene editing technology is currently undergoing clinical research and, although not yet employed officially in clinical treatment of cervical lesions, numerous preclinical studies have substantiated its efficacy. Therefore, it holds promise as a precise treatment strategy for HPV-related cervical lesions.

Herpes Simplex Virus, Human Papillomavirus, and Cervical Cancer: Overview, Relationship, and Treatment Implications

There is a significant body of research examining the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer, with a particular emphasis on the oncogenic proteins E5, E6, and E7. What is less well explored, however, is the relationship between cervical cancer and herpes simplex virus (HSV). To date, studies examining the role of HSV in cervical cancer pathogenesis have yielded mixed results. While several experiments have determined that HPV/HSV-2 coinfection results in a higher risk of developing cervical cancer, others have questioned the validity of this association. However, clarifying the potential role of HSV in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer may have significant implications for both the prevention and treatment of this disease. Should this relationship be clarified, treating and preventing HSV could open another avenue with which to prevent cervical cancer. The importance of this is highlighted by the fact that, despite the creation of an effective vaccine against HPV, cervical cancer still impacts 604,000 women and is responsible for 342,000 deaths annually. This review provides an overview of HSV and HPV infections and then delves into the possible links between HPV, HSV, and cervical cancer. It concludes with a summary of preventive measures against and recent treatment advances in cervical cancer.

Human cytomegalovirus UL138 interaction with USP1 activates STAT1 in infection

Innate immune responses are crucial for limiting virus infection. However, viruses often hijack our best defenses for viral objectives. Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a beta herpesvirus which establishes a life-long latent infection. Defining the virus-host interactions controlling latency and reactivation is vital to the control of viral disease risk posed by virus reactivation. We defined an interaction between UL138, a pro-latency HCMV gene, and the host deubiquitinating complex, UAF1-USP1. UAF1 is a scaffold protein pivotal for the activity of ubiquitin specific peptidases (USP), including USP1. UAF1-USP1 sustains an innate immune response through the phosphorylation and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (pSTAT1), as well as regulates the DNA damage response. After the onset of viral DNA synthesis, pSTAT1 levels are elevated in infection and this depends upon UL138 and USP1. pSTAT1 localizes to viral centers of replication, binds to the viral genome, and influences UL138 expression. Inhibition of USP1 results in a failure to establish latency, marked by increased viral genome replication and production of viral progeny. Inhibition of Jak-STAT signaling also results in increased viral genome synthesis in hematopoietic cells, consistent with a role for USP1-mediated regulation of STAT1 signaling in the establishment of latency. These findings demonstrate the importance of the UL138-UAF1-USP1 virus-host interaction in regulating HCMV latency establishment through the control of innate immune signaling. It will be important going forward to distinguish roles of UAF1-USP1 in regulating pSTAT1 relative to its role in the DNA damage response in HCMV infection.

Human Papillomavirus Genome Copy Number Is Maintained by S-Phase Amplification, Genome Loss to the Cytosol during Mitosis, and Degradation in G1 Phase

The current model of human papillomavirus (HPV) replication is comprised of three modes of replication. Following infectious delivery, the viral genome is amplified during the establishment phase to reach up to some hundred copies per cell. The HPV genome copy number remains constant during the maintenance stage. The differentiation of infected cells induces HPV genome amplification. Using highly sensitive in situ hybridization (DNAscope) and freshly HPV16-infected as well as established HPV16-positive cell lines, we observed that the viral genome is amplified in each S phase of undifferentiated keratinocytes cultured as monolayers. The nuclear viral genome copy number is reset to pre-S-phase levels during mitosis. The majority of the viral genome fails to tether to host chromosomes and is lost to the cytosol. Cytosolic viral genomes gradually decrease during cell cycle progression. The loss of cytosolic genomes is blocked in the presence of NH4Cl or other drugs that interfere with lysosomal acidification, suggesting the involvement of autophagy in viral genome degradation. These observations were also made with HPV31 cell lines obtained from patient samples. Cytosolic viral genomes were not detected in UMSCC47 cells carrying integrated HPV16 DNA. Analyses of organotypic raft cultures derived from keratinocytes harboring episomal HPV16 revealed the presence of cytosolic viral genomes as well. We conclude that HPV maintains viral genome copy numbers by balancing viral genome amplification during S phase with the loss of viral genomes to the cytosol during mitosis. It seems plausible that restrictions to viral genome tethering to mitotic chromosomes reset genome copy numbers in each cell cycle. IMPORTANCE HPV genome maintenance is currently thought to be achieved by regulating the expression and activity of the viral replication factors E1 and E2. In addition, the E8^E2 repressor has been shown to be important for restricting genome copy numbers by competing with E1 and E2 for binding to the viral origin of replication and by recruiting repressor complexes. Here, we demonstrate that the HPV genome is amplified in each S phase. The nuclear genome copy number is reset during mitosis by a failure of the majority of the genomes to tether to mitotic chromosomes. Rather, HPV genomes accumulate in the cytoplasm of freshly divided cells. Cytosolic viral DNA is degraded in G1 in a lysosome-dependent manner, contributing to the genome copy reset. Our data imply that the mode of replication during establishment and maintenance is the same and further suggest that restrictions to genome tethering significantly contribute to viral genome maintenance.

Analysis of the Replication Mechanisms of the Human Papillomavirus Genomes

The life-cycle of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) includes three distinct phases of the viral genome replication. First, the viral genome is amplified in the infected cells, and this amplification is often accompanied by the oligomerization of the viral genomes. Second stage includes the replication of viral genomes in concert with the host cell genome. The viral genome is further amplified during the third stage of the viral-life cycle, which takes place only in the differentiated keratinocytes. We have previously shown that the HPV18 genomes utilize at least two distinct replication mechanisms during the initial amplification. One of these mechanisms is a well-described bidirectional replication via theta type of replication intermediates. The nature of another replication mechanism utilized by HPV18 involves most likely recombination-dependent replication. In this paper, we show that the usage of different replication mechanisms is a property shared also by other HPV types, namely HPV11 and HPV5. We further show that the emergence of the recombination dependent replication coincides with the oligomerization of the viral genomes and is dependent on the replicative DNA polymerases. We also show that the oligomeric genomes of HPV18 replicate almost exclusively using recombination dependent mechanism, whereas monomeric HPV31 genomes replicate bi-directionally during the maintenance phase of the viral life-cycle.

Topoisomerase 2β Induces DNA Breaks To Regulate Human Papillomavirus Replication

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) infect epithelial cells and induce viral genome amplification upon differentiation. HPV proteins activate DNA damage repair pathways by inducing high numbers of DNA breaks in both viral and cellular DNAs.

Topoisomerases regulate higher-order chromatin structures through the transient breaking and religating of one or both strands of the phosphodiester backbone of duplex DNA. TOP2β is a type II topoisomerase that induces double-strand DNA breaks at topologically associated domains (TADS) to relieve torsional stress arising during transcription or replication. TADS are anchored by CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) and SMC1 cohesin proteins in complexes with TOP2β. Upon DNA cleavage, a covalent intermediate DNA-TOP2β (TOP2βcc) is transiently generated to allow for strand passage. The tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase TDP2 can resolve TOP2βcc, but failure to do so quickly can lead to long-lasting DNA breaks. Given the role of CTCF/SMC1 proteins in the human papillomavirus (HPV) life cycle, we investigated whether TOP2β proteins contribute to HPV pathogenesis. Our studies demonstrated that levels of both TOP2β and TDP2 were substantially increased in cells with high-risk HPV genomes, and this correlated with large amounts of DNA breaks. Knockdown of TOP2β with short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) reduced DNA breaks by over 50% as determined through COMET assays. Furthermore, this correlated with substantially reduced formation of repair foci such as phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX), phosphorylated CHK1 (pCHK1), and phosphorylated SMC1 (pSMC1) indicative of impaired activation of DNA damage repair pathways. Importantly, knockdown of TOP2β also blocked HPV genome replication. Our previous studies demonstrated that CTCF/SMC1 factors associate with HPV genomes at sites in the late regions of HPV31, and these correspond to regions that also bind TOP2β. This study identifies TOP2β as responsible for enhanced levels of DNA breaks in HPV-positive cells and as a regulator of viral replication.

Uncovering the Role of the E1 Protein in Different Stages of Human Papillomavirus 18 Genome Replication

The life cycle of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) comprises three distinct phases of DNA replication: initial amplification, maintenance of the genome copy number at a constant level, and vegetative amplification. The viral helicase E1 is one of the factors required for the initiation of HPV genome replication. However, the functions of the E1 protein during other phases of the viral life cycle are largely uncharacterized. Here, we studied the role of the HPV18 E1 helicase in three phases of viral genome replication by downregulating E1 expression using RNA interference or inducing degradation of the E1 protein via inhibition of casein kinase 2α expression or catalytic activity. We generated a novel modified HPV18 genome expressing Nanoluc and tagged E1 and E2 proteins and created several stable HPV18-positive cell lines. We showed that, in contrast to initial amplification of the HPV18 genome, other phases of viral genome replication involve also an E1-independent mechanism. We characterize two distinct populations of HPV18 replicons existing during the maintenance and vegetative amplification phases. We show that a subset of these replicons, including viral genome monomers, replicate in an E1-dependent manner, while some oligomeric forms of the HPV18 genome replicate independently of E1 function.IMPORTANCE Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections pose serious medical problem. To date, there are no HPV-specific antivirals available due to poor understanding of the molecular mechanisms of virus infection cycle. The infection cycle of HPV involves initial amplification of the viral genomes and maintenance of the viral genomes with a constant copy number, followed by another round of viral genome amplification and new viral particle formation. The viral protein E1 is critical for the initial amplification of the viral genome. However, E1 involvement in other phases of the viral life cycle has remained controversial. In the present study, we show that at least two different replication modes of the HPV18 genome are undertaken simultaneously during the maintenance and vegetative amplification phases, i.e., replication of the majority of the HPV18 genome proceeds under the control of the host cell replication machinery without E1 function, whereas a minority of the genome replicates in an E1-dependent manner.