Distinct Requirements for Tail-Anchored Membrane Protein Biogenesis in Escherichia coli

Intermolecular Interactions between a Membrane Protein and a Glycolipid Essential for Membrane Protein Integration

Inducing newly synthesized proteins to appropriate locations is an indispensable biological function in every organism. Integration of proteins into biomembranes in Escherichia coli is mediated by proteinaceous factors, such as Sec translocons and an insertase YidC. Additionally, a glycolipid named MPIase (membrane protein integrase), composed of a long sugar chain and pyrophospholipid, was proven essential for membrane protein integration. We reported that a synthesized minimal unit of MPIase possessing only one trisaccharide, mini-MPIase-3, involves an essential structure for the integration activity. Here, to elucidate integration mechanisms using MPIase, we analyzed intermolecular interactions of MPIase or its synthetic analogs with a model substrate, the Pf3 coat protein, using physicochemical methods. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analyses revealed the importance of a pyrophosphate for affinity to the Pf3 coat protein. Compared with mini-MPIase-3, natural MPIase showed faster association and dissociation due to its long sugar chain despite the slight difference in affinity. To focus on more detailed MPIase substructures, we performed docking simulations and saturation transfer difference-nuclear magnetic resonance. These experiments yielded that the 6-O-acetyl group on glucosamine and the phosphate of MPIase play important roles leading to interactions with the Pf3 coat protein. The high affinity of MPIase to the hydrophobic region and the basic amino acid residues of the protein was suggested by docking simulations and proven experimentally by SPR using protein mutants devoid of target regions. These results demonstrated the direct interactions of MPIase with a substrate protein and revealed detailed mechanisms of membrane protein integration.

Evolutionarily conserved mechanism for membrane recognition from bacteria to mitochondria

The mechanisms controlling membrane recognition by proteins with one hydrophobic stretch at their carboxyl terminus (tail anchor, TA) are poorly defined. The Escherichia coli TAs of ElaB and YqjD, which share sequential and structural similarity with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TA of Fis1, were shown to localize to mitochondria. We show that YqjD and ElaB are directed by their TAs to bacterial cell poles. Fis1(TA) expressed in E. coli localizes like the endogenous TAs. The yeast and bacterial TAs are inserted in the E. coli inner membrane, and they all show affiliation to phosphatidic acid (PA), found in the membrane of the bacterial cell poles and of the yeast mitochondria. Our results suggest a mechanism for TA membrane recognition conserved from bacteria to mitochondria and raise the possibility that through their interaction with PA, and TAs play a role across prokaryotes and eukaryotes in controlling cell/organelle fate.

SRPassing Co-translational Targeting: The Role of the Signal Recognition Particle in Protein Targeting and mRNA Protection

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is an RNA and protein complex that exists in all domains of life. It consists of one protein and one noncoding RNA in some bacteria. It is more complex in eukaryotes and consists of six proteins and one noncoding RNA in mammals. In the eukaryotic cytoplasm, SRP co-translationally targets proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum and prevents misfolding and aggregation of the secretory proteins in the cytoplasm. It was demonstrated recently that SRP also possesses an earlier unknown function, the protection of mRNAs of secretory proteins from degradation. In this review, we analyze the progress in studies of SRPs from different organisms, SRP biogenesis, its structure, and function in protein targeting and mRNA protection.

Eeyarestatin 24 impairs SecYEG-dependent protein trafficking and inhibits growth of clinically relevant pathogens

Eeyarestatin 1 (ES1) is an inhibitor of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) associated protein degradation, Sec61‐dependent Ca²⁺ homeostasis and protein translocation into the ER. Recently, evidence was presented showing that a smaller analog of ES1, ES24, targets the Sec61‐translocon, and captures it in an open conformation that is translocation‐incompetent. We now show that ES24 impairs protein secretion and membrane protein insertion in Escherichia coli via the homologous SecYEG‐translocon. Transcriptomic analysis suggested that ES24 has a complex mode of action, probably involving multiple targets. Interestingly, ES24 shows antibacterial activity toward clinically relevant strains. Furthermore, the antibacterial activity of ES24 is equivalent to or better than that of nitrofurantoin, a known antibiotic that, although structurally similar to ES24, does not interfere with SecYEG‐dependent protein trafficking. Like nitrofurantoin, we find that ES24 requires activation by the NfsA and NfsB nitroreductases, suggesting that the formation of highly reactive nitroso intermediates is essential for target inactivation in vivo.