MinD-RNase E interplay controls localization of polar mRNAs in E. coli

The E. coli transcriptome at the cell's poles (polar transcriptome) is unique compared to the membrane and cytosol. Several factors have been suggested to mediate mRNA localization to the membrane, but the mechanism underlying polar localization of mRNAs remains unknown. Here, we combined a candidate system approach with proteomics to identify factors that mediate mRNAs localization to the cell poles. We identified the pole-to-pole oscillating protein MinD as an essential factor regulating polar mRNA localization, although it is not able to bind RNA directly. We demonstrate that RNase E, previously shown to interact with MinD, is required for proper localization of polar mRNAs. Using in silico modeling followed by experimental validation, the membrane-binding site in RNase E was found to mediate binding to MinD. Intriguingly, not only does MinD affect RNase E interaction with the membrane, but it also affects its mode of action and dynamics. Polar accumulation of RNase E in ΔminCDE cells resulted in destabilization and depletion of mRNAs from poles. Finally, we show that mislocalization of polar mRNAs may prevent polar localization of their protein products. Taken together, our findings show that the interplay between MinD and RNase E determines the composition of the polar transcriptome, thus assigning previously unknown roles for both proteins.

Regulation of major bacterial survival strategies by transcripts sequestration in a membraneless organelle

TmaR, the only known pole-localizer protein in Escherichia coli, was shown to cluster at the cell poles and control localization and activity of the major sugar regulator in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner. Here, we show that TmaR assembles by phase separation (PS) via heterotypic interactions with RNA in vivo and in vitro. An unbiased automated mutant screen combined with directed mutagenesis and genetic manipulations uncovered the importance of a predicted nucleic-acid-binding domain, a disordered region, and charged patches, one containing the phosphorylated tyrosine, for TmaR condensation. We demonstrate that, by protecting flagella-related transcripts, TmaR controls flagella production and, thus, cell motility and biofilm formation. These results connect PS in bacteria to survival and provide an explanation for the linkage between metabolism and motility. Intriguingly, a point mutation or increase in its cellular concentration induces irreversible liquid-to-solid transition of TmaR, similar to human disease-causing proteins, which affects cell morphology and division.

Roles for the Synechococcus elongatus RNA-Binding Protein Rbp2 in Regulating the Circadian Clock

The cyanobacterial circadian oscillator, consisting of KaiA, KaiB, and KaiC proteins, drives global rhythms of gene expression and compaction of the chromosome and regulates the timing of cell division and natural transformation. While the KaiABC posttranslational oscillator can be reconstituted in vitro, the Kai-based oscillator is subject to several layers of regulation in vivo. Specifically, the oscillator proteins undergo changes in their subcellular localization patterns, where KaiA and KaiC are diffuse throughout the cell during the day and localized as a focus at or near the pole of the cell at night. Here, we report that the CI domain of KaiC, when in a hexameric state, is sufficient to target KaiC to the pole. Moreover, increased ATPase activity of KaiC correlates with enhanced polar localization. We identified proteins associated with KaiC in either a localized or diffuse state. We found that loss of Rbp2, found to be associated with localized KaiC, results in decreased incidence of KaiC localization and long-period circadian phenotypes. Rbp2 is an RNA-binding protein, and it appears that RNA-binding activity of Rbp2 is required to execute clock functions. These findings uncover previously unrecognized roles for Rbp2 in regulating the circadian clock and suggest that the proper localization of KaiC is required for a fully functional clock in vivo.

Heterotypic phase separation of Hfq is linked to its roles as an RNA chaperone

Hfq, an Sm-like protein and the major RNA chaperone in E. coli, has been shown to distribute non-uniformly along a helical path under normal growth conditions and to relocate to the cell poles under certain stress conditions. We have previously shown that Hfq relocation to the poles is accompanied by polar accumulation of most small RNAs (sRNAs). Here, we show that Hfq undergoes RNA-dependent phase separation to form cytoplasmic or polar condensates of different density under normal and stress conditions, respectively. Purified Hfq forms droplets in the presence of crowding agents or RNA, indicating that its condensation is via heterotypic interactions. Stress-induced relocation of Hfq condensates and sRNAs to the poles depends on the pole-localizer TmaR. Phase separation of Hfq correlates with its ability to perform its posttranscriptional roles as sRNA-stabilizer and sRNA-mRNA matchmaker. Our study offers a spatiotemporal mechanism for sRNA-mediated regulation in response to environmental changes.

Wisdom of the crowds: A suggested polygenic plan for small-RNA-mediated regulation in bacteria

The omnigenic/polygenic theory, which states that complex traits are not shaped by single/few genes, but by situation-specific large networks, offers an explanation for a major enigma in microbiology: deletion of specific small RNAs (sRNAs) playing key roles in various aspects of bacterial physiology, including virulence and antibiotic resistance, results in surprisingly subtle phenotypes. A recent study uncovered polar accumulation of most sRNAs upon osmotic stress, the majority not known to be involved in the applied stress. Here we show that cells deleted for a handful of pole-enriched sRNAs exhibit fitness defect in several stress conditions, as opposed to single, double, or triple sRNA-knockouts, implying that regulation by sRNA relies on sets of genes. Moreover, analysis of RNA-seq data of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium exposed to antibiotics and/or infection-relevant conditions reveals the involvement of multiple sRNAs in all cases, in line with the existence of a polygenic plan for sRNA-mediated regulation.

Evolutionarily conserved mechanism for membrane recognition from bacteria to mitochondria

The mechanisms controlling membrane recognition by proteins with one hydrophobic stretch at their carboxyl terminus (tail anchor, TA) are poorly defined. The Escherichia coli TAs of ElaB and YqjD, which share sequential and structural similarity with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TA of Fis1, were shown to localize to mitochondria. We show that YqjD and ElaB are directed by their TAs to bacterial cell poles. Fis1(TA) expressed in E. coli localizes like the endogenous TAs. The yeast and bacterial TAs are inserted in the E. coli inner membrane, and they all show affiliation to phosphatidic acid (PA), found in the membrane of the bacterial cell poles and of the yeast mitochondria. Our results suggest a mechanism for TA membrane recognition conserved from bacteria to mitochondria and raise the possibility that through their interaction with PA, and TAs play a role across prokaryotes and eukaryotes in controlling cell/organelle fate.

Coupled Transcription-Translation in Prokaryotes: An Old Couple With New Surprises

Coupled transcription-translation (CTT) is a hallmark of prokaryotic gene expression. CTT occurs when ribosomes associate with and initiate translation of mRNAs whose transcription has not yet concluded, therefore forming "RNAP.mRNA.ribosome" complexes. CTT is a well-documented phenomenon that is involved in important gene regulation processes, such as attenuation and operon polarity. Despite the progress in our understanding of the cellular signals that coordinate CTT, certain aspects of its molecular architecture remain controversial. Additionally, new information on the spatial segregation between the transcriptional and the translational machineries in certain species, and on the capability of certain mRNAs to localize translation-independently, questions the unanimous occurrence of CTT. Furthermore, studies where transcription and translation were artificially uncoupled showed that transcription elongation can proceed in a translation-independent manner. Here, we review studies supporting the occurrence of CTT and findings questioning its extent, as well as discuss mechanisms that may explain both coupling and uncoupling, e.g., chromosome relocation and the involvement of cis- or trans-acting elements, such as small RNAs and RNA-binding proteins. These mechanisms impact RNA localization, stability, and translation. Understanding the two options by which genes can be expressed and their consequences should shed light on a new layer of control of bacterial transcripts fate.

RNA localization in prokaryotes: Where, when, how, and why

Only recently has it been recognized that the transcriptome of bacteria and archaea can be spatiotemporally regulated. All types of prokaryotic transcripts-rRNAs, tRNAs, mRNAs, and regulatory RNAs-may acquire specific localization and these patterns can be temporally regulated. In some cases bacterial RNAs reside in the vicinity of the transcription site, but in many others, transcripts show distinct localizations to the cytoplasm, the inner membrane, or the pole of rod-shaped species. This localization, which often overlaps with that of the encoded proteins, can be achieved either in a translation-dependent or translation-independent fashion. The latter implies that RNAs carry sequence-level features that determine their final localization with the aid of RNA-targeting factors. Localization of transcripts regulates their posttranscriptional fate by affecting their degradation and processing, translation efficiency, sRNA-mediated regulation, and/or propensity to undergo RNA modifications. By facilitating complex assembly and liquid-liquid phase separation, RNA localization is not only a consequence but also a driver of subcellular spatiotemporal complexity. We foresee that in the coming years the study of RNA localization in prokaryotes will produce important novel insights regarding the fundamental understanding of membrane-less subcellular organization and lead to practical outputs with biotechnological and therapeutic implications. This article is categorized under: RNA Export and Localization > RNA Localization Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Regulatory RNAs RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

Spatiotemporal Organization of the E. coli Transcriptome: Translation Independence and Engagement in Regulation

RNA localization in eukaryotes is a mechanism to regulate transcripts fate. Conversely, bacterial transcripts were not assumed to be specifically localized. We previously demonstrated that E. coli mRNAs may localize to where their products localize in a translation-independent manner, thus challenging the transcription-translation coupling extent. However, the scope of RNA localization in bacteria remained unknown. Here, we report the distribution of the E. coli transcriptome between the membrane, cytoplasm, and poles by combining cell fractionation with deep-sequencing (Rloc-seq). Our results reveal asymmetric RNA distribution on a transcriptome-wide scale, significantly correlating with proteome localization and prevalence of translation-independent RNA localization. The poles are enriched with stress-related mRNAs and small RNAs, the latter becoming further enriched upon stress in an Hfq-dependent manner. Genome organization may play a role in localizing membrane protein-encoding transcripts. Our results show an unexpected level of intricacy in bacterial transcriptome organization and highlight the poles as hubs for regulation.

Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Sugar Utilization by E. coli Is Generated by Stochastic Dispersal of the General PTS Protein EI from Polar Clusters

Although the list of proteins that localize to the bacterial cell poles is constantly growing, little is known about their temporal behavior. EI, a major protein of the phosphotransferase system (PTS) that regulates sugar uptake and metabolism in bacteria, was shown to form clusters at the Escherichia coli cell poles. We monitored the localization of EI clusters, as well as diffuse molecules, in space and time during the lifetime of E. coli cells. We show that EI distribution and cluster dynamics varies among cells in a population, and that the cluster speed inversely correlates with cluster size. In growing cells, EI is not assembled into clusters in almost 40% of the cells, and the clusters in most remaining cells dynamically relocate within the pole region or between the poles. In non-growing cells, the fraction of cells that contain EI clusters is significantly higher, and dispersal of these clusters is often observed shortly after exiting quiescence. Later, during growth, EI clusters stochastically re-form by assembly of pre-existing dispersed molecules at random time points. Using a fluorescent glucose analog, we found that EI function inversely correlates with clustering and with cluster size. Thus, activity is exerted by dispersed EI molecules, whereas the polar clusters serve as a reservoir of molecules ready to act when needed. Taken together our findings highlight the spatiotemporal distribution of EI as a novel layer of regulation that contributes to the population phenotypic heterogeneity with regard to sugar metabolism, seemingly conferring a survival benefit.

A Search for Ribonucleic Antiterminator Sites in Bacterial Genomes: Not Only Antitermination?

BglG/LicT-like proteins are transcriptional antiterminators that prevent termination of transcription at intrinsic terminators by binding to ribonucleic antiterminator (RAT) sites and stabilizing an RNA conformation which is mutually exclusive with the terminator structure. The known RAT sites, which are located in intergenic regions of sugar utilization operons, show low sequence conservation but significant structural analogy. To assess the prevalence of RATs in bacterial genomes, we employed bioinformatic tools that describe RNA motifs based on both sequence and structural constraints. Using descriptors with different stringency, we searched the genomes of Escherichiacoli K12, uropathogenic E. coli and Bacillus subtilis for putative RATs. Our search identified all known RATs and additional putative RAT elements. Surprisingly, most putative RATs do not overlap an intrinsic terminator and many reside within open reading frames (ORFs). The ability of one of the putative RATs, which is located within an antiterminator-encoding ORF and does not overlap a terminator, to bind to its cognate antiterminator protein in vitro and in vivo was confirmed experimentally. Our results suggest that the capacity of RAT elements has been exploited during evolution to mediate activities other than antitermination, for example control of transcription elongation or of RNA stability.

RNA localization in bacteria

One of the most important discoveries in the field of microbiology in the last two decades is that bacterial cells have intricate subcellular organization. This understanding has emerged mainly from the depiction of spatial and temporal organization of proteins in specific domains within bacterial cells, e.g., midcell, cell poles, membrane and periplasm. Because translation of bacterial RNA molecules was considered to be strictly coupled to their synthesis, they were not thought to specifically localize to regions outside the nucleoid. However, the increasing interest in RNAs, including non-coding RNAs, encouraged researchers to explore the spatial and temporal localization of RNAs in bacteria. The recent technological improvements in the field of fluorescence microscopy allowed subcellular imaging of RNAs even in the tiny bacterial cells. It has been reported by several groups, including ours that transcripts may specifically localize in such cells. Here we review what is known about localization of RNA and of the pathways that determine RNA fate in bacteria, and discuss the possible cues and mechanisms underlying these distribution patterns.

The compartmentalized vessel: The bacterial cell as a model for subcellular organization (a tale of two studies)

The traditional view of bacterial cells as non-compartmentalized, which is based on the lack of membrane-engulfed organelles, is currently being reassessed. Many studies in recent years led to the realization that bacteria have an intricate internal organization that is vital for various cellular processes. Specifically, various machineries were shown to localize to the poles of rod-shaped bacteria. We have recently shown that the control center of the PTS system, which governs carbon uptake and metabolism, localizes to the poles of E. coli cells. Notably, the machinery that controls bacterial taxis along chemical gradients (chemotaxis) has a similar localization pattern. The fact that the two systems need to communicate in order to generate an optimal metabolic response suggests that their similar spatial organization is not a coincidence. Rather, due to their special characteristics, the poles may function as hubs for signaling systems to allow for efficient crosstalk between different pathways in order to improve coordination of their actions.The regulatory mechanisms that underlie the spatial and temporal organization of microbial cells are largely unknown. Thus far, these mechanisms were believed to rely on embedded features of the localized proteins. In another study, we have recently shown that mRNAs are capable of migrating to particular domains in the bacterial cell where their protein products are required. In contrast to the view that transcription and translation are coupled in bacteria, localization of bacterial transcripts may occur in a translation-independent manner. Hence, it seems that the mechanistic basis for separating transcription and translation is more primitive than assumed up until now. We propose that bacteria synthesize proteins either by a transcription-translation coupled mechanism or by transporting mRNAs away from the transcription apparatus. Obviously, eukaryotic cells rely on the latter mechanism. Hence, the capacity of prokaryotic cells to adopt the division between transcription and translation was a crucial step in the evolution of nucleus-containing cells from the prokaryotic origin. Summarily, the line that separates cells with nucleus and cells without is fading, leading to the realization that bacteria are suitable model organisms for studying universal mechanisms that underlie spatial regulation of cellular processes.

Protein targeting via mRNA in bacteria

Proteins of all living organisms must reach their subcellular destination to sustain the cell structure and function. The proteins are transported to one of the cellular compartments, inserted into the membrane, or secreted across the membrane to the extracellular milieu. Cells have developed various mechanisms to transport proteins across membranes, among them localized translation. Evidence for targeting of Messenger RNA for the sake of translation of their respective protein products at specific subcellular sites in many eukaryotic model organisms have been accumulating in recent years. Cis-acting RNA localizing elements, termed RNA zip-codes, which are embedded within the mRNA sequence, are recognized by RNA-binding proteins, which in turn interact with motor proteins, thus coordinating the intracellular transport of the mRNA transcripts. Despite the rareness of conventional organelles, first and foremost a nucleus, pieces of evidence for mRNA localization to specific subcellular domains, where their protein products function, have also been obtained for prokaryotes. Although the underlying mechanisms for transcript localization in bacteria are yet to be unraveled, it is now obvious that intracellular localization of mRNA is a common mechanism to spatially localize proteins in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.

Translation-independent localization of mRNA in E. coli

Understanding the organization of a bacterial cell requires the elucidation of the mechanisms by which proteins localize to particular subcellular sites. Thus far, such mechanisms have been suggested to rely on embedded features of the localized proteins. Here, we report that certain messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in Escherichia coli are targeted to the future destination of their encoded proteins, cytoplasm, poles, or inner membrane in a translation-independent manner. Cis-acting sequences within the transmembrane-coding sequence of the membrane proteins are necessary and sufficient for mRNA targeting to the membrane. In contrast to the view that transcription and translation are coupled in bacteria, our results show that, subsequent to their synthesis, certain mRNAs are capable of migrating to particular domains in the cell where their future protein products are required.

Genetic dissection of the divergent activities of the multifunctional membrane sensor BglF

BglF catalyzes beta-glucoside phosphotransfer across the cytoplasmic membrane in Escherichia coli. In addition, BglF acts as a sugar sensor that controls expression of beta-glucoside utilization genes by reversibly phosphorylating the transcriptional antiterminator BglG. Thus, BglF can exist in two opposed states: a nonstimulated state that inactivates BglG by phosphorylation and a sugar-stimulated state that activates BglG by dephosphorylation and phosphorylates the incoming sugar. Sugar phosphorylation and BglG (de)phosphorylation are both catalyzed by the same residue, Cys24. To investigate the coordination and the structural requirements of the opposing activities of BglF, we conducted a genetic screen that led to the isolation of mutations that shift the balance toward BglG phosphorylation. We show that some of the mutants that are impaired in dephosphorylation of BglG retained the ability to catalyze the concurrent activity of sugar phosphotransfer. These mutations map to two regions in the BglF membrane domain that, based on their predicted topology, were suggested to be implicated in activity. Using in vivo cross-linking, we show that a glycine in the membrane domain, whose substitution impaired the ability of BglF to dephosphorylate BglG, is spatially close to the active-site cysteine located in a hydrophilic domain. This residue is part of a newly identified motif conserved among beta-glucoside permeases associated with RNA-binding transcriptional antiterminators. The phenotype of the BglF mutants could be suppressed by BglG mutants that were isolated by a second genetic screen. In summary, we identified distinct sites in BglF that are involved in regulating phosphate flow via the common active-site residue in response to environmental cues.

Dynamic Membrane Topology of the Escherichia coli β-Glucoside Transporter BglF

The Escherichia coli BglF protein, a permease of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system, catalyzes transport and phosphorylation of beta-glucosides. In addition, BglF regulates bgl operon expression by controlling the activity of the transcriptional regulator BglG via reversible phosphorylation. BglF is composed of three domains; one is hydrophobic, which presumably forms the sugar translocation channel. We studied the topology of this domain by Cys-replacement mutagenesis and chemical modification by thiol reagents. Most Cys substitutions were well tolerated, as demonstrated by the ability of the mutant proteins to catalyze BglF activities. Our results suggest that the membrane domain contains eight transmembrane helices and an alleged cytoplasmic loop that contains two additional helices. The latter region forms a dynamic structure, as evidenced by the alternation of residues near its ends between faced-in and faced-out states. We suggest that this region, together with the two transmembrane helices encompassing it, forms the sugar translocation channel. BglF periplasmic loops are close to the membrane, the first being a reentrant loop. This is the first systematic topological study carried out with an intact phosphotransferase system permease and the first demonstration of a reentrant loop in this group of proteins.

The bgl sensory system: a transmembrane signaling pathway controlling transcriptional antitermination

The bgl system represents a family of sensory systems composed of membrane-bound sugar-sensors and transcriptional antiterminators, which regulate expression of genes involved in sugar utilization in response to the presence of the corresponding sugar in the growth medium. The BglF sensor catalyzes different activities depending on its stimulation state: in its non-stimulated state, it phosphorylates the BglG transcriptional regulator, thus inactivating it; in the presence of the stimulating sugar, it transports the sugar and phosphorylates it and also activates BglG by dephosphorylation, leading to bgl operon expression. The sugar stimulates BglF by inducing a change in its membrane topology. BglG exists in several conformations: a dimer, which is active, and compact and non-compact monomers, which are inactive. BglF modulates the transition of BglG from one conformation to another, depending on sugar availability. The two Bgl proteins form a pre-complex at the membrane that dissociates upon stimulation, enabling BglG to exert its effect on transcription.

Experimental and Computational Characterization of the Dimerization of the PTS-regulation Domains of BglG from Escherichia coli

BglG and LicT are transcriptional antiterminators from Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, respectively, that control the expression of genes and operons involved in transport and catabolism of carbohydrates. Both proteins contain a duplicate conserved domain, the PTS-regulation domain (PRD), and they are regulated by phosphorylation on specific, highly conserved histidine residues located in the PRDs. However, despite their similar function and the high sequence identity, experimental evidence implies different modes of regulation. Thus, BglG must be de-phosphorylated on PRD2 in order to form active dimers, whereas activation of LicT requires de-phosphorylation on PRD1 and phosphorylation on PRD2. Here we address two goals. First, we test in vivo and in silico the effect of point mutations in the PRDs of BglG on the PRD-PRD dimerization. Second, we explore computationally the effect of histidine phosphorylation on PRD dimerization in BglG and LicT. We find excellent correspondence between the experimental and computational measures of the influence of mutations on PRD dimerization in BglG. This establishes that the geometric-electrostatic complementarity scores computed with the program MolFit provide a good measure of the effects of mutations in this system. In addition, it indicates that the dimerization mode of the separately expressed PRDs of BglG is similar to the dimers formed by activated LicT. The computations also show that phosphorylation of the histidine residues in PRD1 of either BglG or LicT leads to a strong electrostatic repulsion. Conversely, the phosphorylation of one histidine residue in PRD2 of LicT leads to improved electrostatic complementarity at the PRD2-PRD2 interface, whereas the corresponding phosphorylation in BglG has negligible contribution. This different conduct may be attributed to a single replacement in the sequence of PRD2 in BglG compared to LicT, Ala262 versus Asp261, respectively.

Modulation of monomer conformation of the BglG transcriptional antiterminator from Escherichia coli

The BglG protein positively regulates expression of the bgl operon in Escherichia coli by binding as a dimer to the bgl transcript and preventing premature termination of transcription in the presence of beta-glucosides. BglG activity is negatively controlled by BglF, the beta-glucoside phosphotransferase, which reversibly phosphorylates BglG according to beta-glucoside availability, thus modulating its dimeric state. BglG consists of an RNA-binding domain and two homologous domains, PRD1 and PRD2. Based on structural studies of a BglG homologue, the two PRDs fold similarly, and the interactions within the dimer are PRD1-PRD1 and PRD2-PRD2. We have recently shown that the affinity between PRD1 and PRD2 of BglG is high, and a fraction of the BglG monomers folds in the cell into a compact conformation, in which PRD1 and PRD2 are in close proximity. We show here that both BglG forms, the compact and noncompact, bind to the active site-containing domain of BglF, IIB(bgl), in vitro. The interaction of BglG with IIB(bgl) or BglF is mediated by PRD2. Both BglG forms are detected as phosphorylated proteins after in vitro phosphorylation with IIB(bgl) and are dephosphorylated by BglF in vitro in the presence of beta-glucosides. Nevertheless, genetic evidence indicates that the interaction of IIB(bgl) and BglF with the compact form is seemingly less favorable. Using in vivo cross-linking, we show that BglF enhances folding of BglG into a compact conformation, whereas the addition of beta-glucosides reduces the amount of this form. Based on these results we suggest a model for the modulation of BglG conformation and activity by BglF.

Interactions between the PTS regulation domains of the BglG transcriptional antiterminator from Escherichia coli

The E. coli BglG protein inhibits transcription termination within the bgl operon in the presence of beta-glucosides. BglG represents a family of transcriptional antiterminators that bind to RNA sequences, which partially overlap rho-independent terminators, and prevent termination by stabilizing an alternative structure of the transcript. The activity of BglG is determined by its dimeric state, which is modulated by reversible phosphorylation catalyzed by BglF, a PTS permease. Only the non-phosphorylated BglG dimer binds to RNA and allows read-through of transcription. BglG is composed of three domains: an RNA-binding domain followed by two domains, PRD1 and PRD2 (PTS regulation domains), which are similar in their sequence and folding. Based on the three-dimensional structure of dimeric LicT, a BglG homologue from Bacillus subtilis, the interactions within the dimer are PRD1-PRD1 and PRD2-PRD2. We have shown before that PRD2 mediates homodimerization very efficiently. Using genetic systems and in vitro techniques that assay and characterize protein-protein interactions, we show here that the PRD1 dimerizes very slowly, but once it does, the homodimers are stable. These results support our model that formation of BglG dimers initiates with PRD2 dimerization followed by zipping up of two BglG monomers to create the active RNA-binding domain. Moreover, our results demonstrate that PRD1 and PRD2 heterodimerize efficiently in vitro and in vivo. The affinity among the PRDs is in the following order: PRD2-PRD2 > PRD1-PRD2 > PRD1-PRD1. The interaction between PRD1 and PRD2 offers an explanation for the requirement of conserved residues in PRD1 for the phosphorylation of PRD2 by BglF.

A fraction of the BglG transcriptional antiterminator from Escherichia coli exists as a compact monomer

Expression of the bgl operon in Escherichia coli, induced by beta-glucosides, is positively regulated by BglG, a transcriptional antiterminator. In the presence of inducer, BglG dimerizes and binds to the bgl transcript to prevent premature termination of transcription. The dimeric state of BglG is determined by BglF, a membrane-bound enzyme II of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS), which reversibly phosphorylates BglG according to beta-glucoside availability. BglG is composed of an RNA-binding domain followed by two homologous PTS regulation domains (PRD1 and PRD2). The predicted structure of dimeric LicT, a BglG homologue from Bacillus subtilis, suggests that the two PRDs adopt a similar structure and that the interactions within the dimer are PRD1-PRD1 and PRD2-PRD2. We have shown recently that the PRD1 and PRD2 domains of BglG can form a stable heterodimer. We report here, based on in vitro and in vivo cross-linking experiments, that a fraction of BglG is present in the cell in a compact form in which PRD1 and PRD2 are in close proximity. The compact form is present mainly in the BglG monomers. Our results imply that the monomer-dimer transition involves a conformational change. The possible role of the compact form in preventing untimely induction of the bgl operon is discussed.

The BglF sensor recruits the BglG transcription regulator to the membrane and releases it on stimulation

The Escherichia coli BglF protein is a sugar-sensor that controls the activity of the transcriptional antiterminator BglG by reversibly phosphorylating it, depending on beta-glucoside availability. BglF is a membrane-bound protein, whereas BglG is a soluble protein, and they are both present in the cell in minute amounts. How do BglF and BglG find each other to initiate signal transduction efficiently? Using bacterial two-hybrid systems and the Far-Western technique, we demonstrated unequivocally that BglG binds to BglF and to its active site-containing domain in vivo and in vitro. Measurements by surface plasmon resonance corroborated that the affinity between these proteins is high enough to enable their stable binding. To visualize the subcellular localization of BglG, we used fluorescence microscopy. In cells lacking BglF, the BglG-GFP fusion protein was evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm. In contrast, in cells producing BglF, BglG-GFP was localized to the membrane. On addition of beta-glucoside, BglG-GFP was released from the membrane, becoming evenly distributed throughout the cell. Using mutant proteins and genetic backgrounds that impede phosphorylation of the Bgl proteins, we demonstrated that BglG-BglF binding and recruitment of BglG to the membrane sensor requires phosphorylation but does not depend on the individual phosphorylation sites of the Bgl proteins. We suggest a mechanism for rapid response to environmental changes by preassembly of signaling complexes, which contain transcription regulators recruited by their cognate sensors-kinases, under nonstimulating conditions, and release of the regulators to the cytoplasm on stimulation. This mechanism might be applicable to signaling cascades in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

A novel sugar-stimulated covalent switch in a sugar sensor

The bgl sensory system is composed of a membrane-bound sugar sensor, BglF, and a transcriptional regulator, BglG. The sensor BglF has several enzymatic activities: in its nonstimulated state, it acts as BglG phosphorylase; in the presence of beta-glucoside in the growth medium, it acts as BglG dephosphorylase and as the beta-glucoside phosphotransferase. The same active site on BglF, Cys-24, is responsible for the phosphorylation of both the stimulating sugar and the BglG protein. BglF is composed of three domains, two hydrophilic and one hydrophobic. Our previous results suggested that catalysis of the sugar-stimulated functions depends on specific interactions between the B domain, which contains the active site cysteine, and the integral membrane C domain. We report here that the stimulating sugar triggers the formation of a disulfide bond between the active site cysteine and another cysteine in the membrane-embedded domain of BglF. Inability of a mutant BglF protein to form the disulfide bridge between the B and C domains correlates with its inability to catalyze the sugar-stimulated functions. The ability of the cysteine residue in BglF to bind covalently either to a phosphoryl group or to another cysteine residue, depending on the protein stimulation state, suggests a novel way to control signaling by alternative bond formation.

Dephosphorylation of the Escherichia coli transcriptional antiterminator BglG by the sugar sensor BglF is the reversal of its phosphorylation

The Escherichia coli BglF protein catalyzes transport and phosphorylation of beta-glucosides. In addition, BglF is a membrane sensor which reversibly phosphorylates the transcriptional regulator BglG, depending on beta-glucoside availability. Therefore, BglF has three enzymatic activities: beta-glucoside phosphotransferase, BglG phosphorylase, and phospho-BglG (BglG-P) dephosphorylase. Cys-24 of BglF is the active site which delivers the phosphoryl group either to the sugar or to BglG. To characterize the dephosphorylase activity, we asked whether BglG-P can give the phosphoryl group back to Cys-24 of BglF. Here we provide evidence which is consistent with the interpretation that Cys-24-P is an intermediate in the BglG-P dephosphorylation reaction. Hence, the dephosphorylation reaction catalyzed by BglF proceeds via reversal of the phosphorylation reaction.

BglG, the transcriptional antiterminator of the bgl system, interacts with the beta' subunit of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

The Escherichia coli BglG protein antiterminates transcription at two terminator sites within the bgl operon in response to the presence of beta-glucosides in the growth medium. BglG was previously shown to be an RNA-binding protein that recognizes a specific sequence located just upstream of each of the terminators and partially overlapping with them. We show here that BglG also binds to the E. coli RNA polymerase, both in vivo and in vitro. By using several techniques, we identified the beta' subunit of RNA polymerase as the target for BglG binding. The region that contains the binding site for BglG was mapped to the N-terminal region of beta'. The beta' subunit, produced in excess, prevented BglG activity as a transcriptional antiterminator. Possible roles of the interaction between BglG and the polymerase beta' subunit are discussed.

Characterization of the dimerization domain in BglG, an RNA-binding transcriptional antiterminator from Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli transcriptional antiterminator protein BglG inhibits transcription termination of the bgl operon in response to the presence of beta-glucosides in the growth medium. BglG is an RNA-binding protein that recognizes a specific sequence partially overlapping the two terminators within the bgl transcript. The activity of BglG is determined by its dimeric state which is modulated by reversible phosphorylation. Thus, only the nonphosphorylated dimer binds to the RNA target site and allows readthrough of transcription. Genetic systems which test dimerization and antitermination in vivo were used to map and delimit the region which mediates BglG dimerization. We show that the last 104 residues of BglG are required for dimerization. Any attempt to shorten this region from the ends or to introduce internal deletions abolished the dimerization capacity of this region. A putative leucine zipper motif is located at the N terminus of this region. The role of the canonical leucines in dimerization was demonstrated by their substitution. Our results also suggest that the carboxy-terminal 70 residues, which follow the leucine zipper, contain another dimerization domain which does not resemble any known dimerization motif. Each of these two regions is necessary but not sufficient for dimerization. The BglG phosphorylation site, His208, resides at the junction of the two putative dimerization domains. Possible mechanisms by which the phosphorylation of BglG controls its dimerization and thus its activity are discussed.

BglF, the Escherichia coli beta-glucoside permease and sensor of the bgl system: domain requirements of the different catalytic activities

The Escherichia coli BglF protein, an enzyme II of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent carbohydrate phosphotransferase system, has several enzymatic activities. In the absence of beta-glucosides, it phosphorylates BglG, a positive regulator of bgl operon transcription, thus inactivating BglG. In the presence of beta-glucosides, it activates BglG by dephosphorylating it and, at the same time, transports beta-glucosides into the cell and phosphorylates them. BglF is composed of two hydrophilic domains, IIAbgl and IIBbgl, and a membrane-bound domain, IICbgl, which are covalently linked in the order IIBCAbgl. Cys-24 in the IIBbgl domain is essential for all the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation activities of BglF. We have investigated the domain requirement of the different functions carried out by BglF. To this end, we cloned the individual BglF domains, as well as the domain pairs IIBCbgl and IICAbgl, and tested which domains and which combinations are required for the catalysis of the different functions, both in vitro and in vivo. We show here that the IIB and IIC domains, linked to each other (IIBCbgl), are required for the sugar-driven reactions, i. e., sugar phosphotransfer and BglG activation by dephosphorylation. In contrast, phosphorylated IIBbgl alone can catalyze BglG inactivation by phosphorylation. Thus, the sugar-induced and noninduced functions have different structural requirements. Our results suggest that catalysis of the sugar-induced functions depends on specific interactions between IIBbgl and IICbgl which occur upon the interaction of BglF with the sugar.

The different functions of BglF, the E. coli beta-glucoside permease and sensor of the bgl system, have different structural requirements

The Escherichia coli BglF protein (EIIbgl) is an Enzyme II (EII) of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) which catalyses transport and phosphorylation of beta-glucosides. In addition to its transport function, BglF serves as a beta-glucoside sensor which reversibly phosphorylates BglG, the transcription regulator of the bgl operon. Like many other PTS sugar permeases, the BglF protein is composed of three discrete functional and structural domains: IIAbgl and IIBbgl, which are hydrophilic, and IICbgl, which is hydrophobic. The domains of BglF are covalently linked to one another in the order BCA. The IIAbgl domain contains the first phosphorylation site, which accepts a phosphoryl group from the general PTS protein HPr and delivers it to the second phosphorylation site, located in the IIBbgl domain. This second site can deliver the phosphoryl group either to a beta-glucoside or to BglG. To elucidate the mechanism by which such different substrates can be phosphorylated by the same active site, we decided to try to separate the different phosphorylation activities catalyzed by BglF. To this end we rearranged the BglF domains and constructed IICBAbgl (scrambled-BglF). Scrambled-BglF behaved like wild-type BglF in its ability to be phosphorylated and to phosphorylate BglG in vitro and in vivo. However, it could not catalyze phosphorylation of beta-glucosides in vitro nor their phosphotransfer in vivo, and it could not catalyze BglG dephosphorylation in vitro or in vivo. Therefore, the two reactions induced by beta-glucosides, sugar phosphorylation and BglG dephosphorylation, seem to require a specific domain organization: IIBbgl should precede IICbgl. The order of the B and C domains is irrelevant for BglG phosphorylation, which occurs in the absence of beta-glucosides. Because the domain order affects the way that the domains are able to interact, our results suggest that catalysis of the sugar-induced functions depends on specific interactions between IIBbgl and IICbgl. In light of the previous assumption that domain order in EIIs is immaterial for their function, the finding that the order of the domains is important for the function of BglF as a sugar phosphotransferase raises two possibilities: (a) BglF differs from other EIIs in this regard; (b) BglF represents a subgroup of EIIs in which the requirement for a specific domain order correlates with the ability to transport a set of structurally related sugars.

BglF, the sensor of the bgl system and the beta-glucosides permease of Escherichia coli: evidence for dimerization and intersubunit phosphotransfer

The Escherichia coli BglF protein, also designated EIIbgl, is an enzyme II of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) that catalyzes transport and phosphorylation of beta-glucosides. In addition, BglF has the ability, unusual for an EII, to regulate the activity of a transcriptional regulator, BglG, by phosphorylating and dephosphorylating it according to beta-glucoside availability. Together, BglF and BglG constitute a novel sensory system. The membrane-bound sensor, BglF, has two phosphorylation sites: site 1 accepts a phosphoryl group from HPr and delivers it to site 2; site 2 delivers the phosphoryl group either to beta-glucosides or to BglG. Here, we provide several lines of evidence for the dimerization of BglF and for the occurrence of productive intersubunit phosphotransfer within the BglF dimers. (1) Two inactive BglF mutant proteins, one lacking phosphorylation site 1 and the other lacking site 2, complement one another to allow beta-glucoside utilization by bglF strains. (2) The pairs of mutant proteins complement one another in regulating BglG activity as a transcriptional antiterminator in vivo. (3) Only when they are present in the same membrane preparation do the mutant protein pairs efficiently transfer the phosphoryl group from HPr to beta-glucosides and to BglG in vitro. (4) Gentle extraction of cellular proteins followed by SDS-PAGE reveals the existence of BglF homodimers. A portion of the phosphorylated form of BglF can also be extracted from the membrane as a dimer. Dimerization is mediated by the membrane-bound IICbgl domain, as indicated by the dimerization of IICbgl by itself and of BglF derivatives that contain this domain. Since dimers persist in the presence of a reducing agent, they are apparently not held together by disulfide bonds. Rather, BglF dimerization might involve hydrophobic interactions between residues in the membrane-spanning domain. In addition, we show that BglF dimerization is not modulated by beta-glucosides and is therefore not part of the mechanism that diverts the phosphoryl group away from BglG to the transported sugar upon addition of beta-glucosides to the growth medium.

SacY, a transcriptional antiterminator from Bacillus subtilis, is regulated by phosphorylation in vivo

SacY antiterminates transcription of the sacB gene in Bacillus subtilis in response to the presence of sucrose in the growth medium. We have found that it can substitute for BglG, a homologous protein, in antiterminating transcription of the bgl operon in Escherichia coli. We therefore sought to determine whether, similarly to BglG, SacY is regulated by reversible phosphorylation in response to the availability of the inducing sugar. We show here that two forms of SacY, phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated, exist in B. subtilis cells and that the ratio between them depends on the external level of sucrose. Addition of sucrose to the growth medium after SacY phosphorylation in the cell resulted in its rapid dephosphorylation. The extent of SacY phosphorylation was found to be proportional to the cellular levels of SacX, a putative sucrose permease which was previously shown to have a negative effect on SacY activity. Thus, the mechanism by which the sac sensory system modulates sacB expression in response to sucrose involves reversible phosphorylation of the regulator SacY, and this process appears to depend on the SacX sucrose sensor. The sac system is therefore a member of the novel family of sensory systems represented by bgl.

BglG, the response regulator of the Escherichia coli bgl operon, is phosphorylated on a histidine residue

We have shown previously that the activity of BglG, the response regulator of the bgl system, as a transcriptional antiterminator is modulated by the sensor BglF, which reversibly phosphorylates BglG. We show here that the phosphoryl group on BglG is present as a phosphoramidate, based on the sensitivity of phosphorylated BglG to heat, hydroxylamine, and acidic but not basic conditions. By analyzing the products of base-hydrolyzed phosphorylated BglG by thin-layer chromatography, we show that the phosphorylation occurs on a histidine residue. This result supports the notion that the bgl system is a member of a new family of bacterial sensory systems.

BglF, the sensor of the E. coli bgl system, uses the same site to phosphorylate both a sugar and a regulatory protein

The Escherichia coli BglF protein is a sugar permease that is a member of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS). It catalyses transport and phosphorylation of beta-glucosides. In addition to its ability to phosphorylate its sugar substrate, BglF has the unusual ability to phosphorylate and dephosphorylate the transcriptional regulator BglG according to beta-glucoside availability. By controlling the phosphorylation state of BglG, BglF controls the dimeric state of BglG and thus its ability to bind RNA and antiterminate transcription of the bgl operon. BglF has two phosphorylation sites. The first site accepts a phosphoryl group from the PTS protein HPr; the phosphoryl group is then transferred to the second phosphorylation site, which can deliver it to the sugar. We provide both in vitro and in vivo evidence that the same phosphorylation site on BglF, the second one, is in charge not only of sugar phosphorylation but also of BglG phosphorylation. Possible mechanisms that ensure correct phosphoryl delivery to the right entity, sugar or protein, depending on environmental conditions, are discussed.

The localization of the phosphorylation site of BglG, the response regulator of the Escherichia coli bgl sensory system

BglG, the response regulator of the bgl sensory system, was recently shown to be phosphorylated on a histidine residue. We report here the localization of the phosphorylation site to histidine 208. Localization of the phosphorylated histidine was carried out in two steps. We first engineered BglG derivatives with a specific protease (factor Xa) cleavage site that allowed asymmetric splitting of each prephosphorylated protein to well defined peptides, of which only one was labeled by radioactive phosphate. This allowed the localization of the phosphorylation site to the last 111 residues. Subsequently, we identified the phosphorylated histidine by mutating each of the three histidines located in this region to an arginine and following the ability of the resulting mutants to be in vivo regulated and in vitro phosphorylated by BglF, the bgl system sensor. Histidine 208 was the only histidine which failed both tests. The use of simple techniques to map the phosphorylation site should make this protocol applicable for the localization of phosphorylation sites in other proteins. The bgl system represents a new family of sensory systems. Thus, the mapping reported here is an important step toward the definition of the functional domains involved in the transduction of a signal by the components that constitute systems of this novel family.

Modulation of the dimerization of a transcriptional antiterminator protein by phosphorylation

The transcriptional antiterminator protein BglG inhibits transcription termination of the bgl operon in Escherichia coli when it is in the nonphosphorylated state. The BglG protein is now shown to exist in two configurations, an active, dimeric nonphosphorylated form and an inactive, monomeric phosphorylated form. The migration of BglG on native polyacrylamide gels was consistent with it existing as a dimer when nonphosphorylated and as a monomer when phosphorylated. Only the nonphosphorylated dimer was found to bind to the target RNA. When the dimerization domain of the lambda repressor was replaced with BglG, the resulting chimera behaved like an intact lambda repressor in its ability to repress lambda gene expression, which suggests that BglG dimerizes in vivo. Repression by the lambda-BglG hybrid was significantly reduced by BglF, the BglG kinase, an effect that was relieved by conditions that stimulate dephosphorylation of BglG by BglF. These results suggest that the phosphorylation and the dephosphorylation of BglG regulate its activity by controlling its dimeric state.

Regulation of activity of a transcriptional anti-terminator in E. coli by phosphorylation in vivo

Expression of the bgl operon of Escherichia coli is regulated in vitro by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of a positive regulatory protein, BglG, which functions in its nonphosphorylated state as a transcriptional antiterminator. The degree of phosphorylation of BglG in vivo was shown to be dependent on the cellular levels of BglF protein, which is both the BglG kinase and phosphatase. The degree of phosphorylation of BglG also depended on the presence or absence of a beta-glucoside, the inducer of operon expression. Addition of inducer to cells in growth medium resulted in rapid dephosphorylation of phosphorylated BglG. The bgl operon is thus regulated by a sensory system that modulates gene expression by protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in response to the external levels of inducer.

Protein phosphorylation regulates transcription of the beta-glucoside utilization operon in E. coli

We have investigated the interaction between BglF and BglG, two proteins that regulate expression of the E. coli bgl operon. BglF is both a negative regulator of operon expression and a phosphotransferase involved in uptake of beta-glucosides. BglG is a positive regulator that functions as a transcriptional antiterminator. We show here that BglF is phosphorylated by the soluble components of the phosphotransferase system: Enzyme I, HPr, and the phosphate donor phosphoenolpyruvate. Phosphorylated BglF can then transfer phosphate either to beta-glucosides or to wild-type BglG. Mutant BglG derivatives, which give constitutive expression of the bgl operon, show little or no phosphorylation by BglF. Hence BglF exerts its negative effect on operon expression by phosphorylating BglG, blocking its action as an antiterminator. BglG is dephosphorylated only in the presence of both BglF and beta-glucosides. Based on these results, we propose the following mechanism: In the absence of beta-glucosides, BglG is phosphorylated by BglF and is inactive in antitermination. Addition of inducer stimulates BglF to dephosphorylate BglG, allowing BglG to function as a positive regulator of operon expression. Beta-Glucosides are then phosphorylated and transported into the cell by BglF.

Efficient and accurate in vitro processing of simian virus 40-associated small RNA

Nuclei were isolated from simian virus 40 (SV40)-infected cells with a hypotonic, detergent-free buffer and incubated in vitro in a high-ionic-strength buffer containing [alpha-32P]UTP. The labeled viral RNAs produced were analyzed by gel electrophoresis together with 3-h-labeled viral RNAs extracted from SV40-infected cells. The in vitro-synthesized RNA contained a major RNA species of 62 to 64 nucleotides that appeared on the gel at the same position as in vivo-synthesized SV40-associated small RNA (SAS-RNA). Analyses of the in vitro-synthesized 62- to 64-nucleotide RNA by hybridization to restriction fragments and by the use of an SAS-RNA deletion mutant clearly identified it as SAS-RNA. The intensity of the band of the in vitro-synthesized SAS-RNA increased with an increase in the labeling time or when a short pulse was followed by a chase. Moreover, the SAS-RNA band disappeared when ITP replaced GTP in the transcription reaction mixture. These results indicate that SAS-RNA is processed from a precursor molecule and that an RNA secondary structure could be an element recognized by the processing enzyme.