Dynamic Membrane Localization of RNase Y in Bacillus subtilis

Proteomic composition of eukaryotic and bacterial RNA decay condensates suggests convergent evolution

Bacterial cells have a unique challenge to organize their cytoplasm without the use of membrane-bound organelles. Biomolecular condensates (henceforth BMCs) are a class of nonmembrane-bound organelles, which, through the physical process of phase separation, can form liquid-like droplets with proteins/nucleic acids. BMCs have been broadly characterized in eukaryotic cells, and BMCs have been recently identified in bacteria, with the first and best studied example being bacterial ribonucleoprotein bodies (BR-bodies). BR-bodies contain the RNA decay machinery and show functional parallels to eukaryotic P-bodies (PBs) and stress granules (SGs). Due to the finding that mRNA decay machinery is compartmentalized in BR-bodies and in eukaryotic PBs/SGs, we will explore the functional similarities in the proteins, which are known to enrich in these structures based on recent proteomic studies. Interestingly, despite the use of different mRNA decay and post-transcriptional regulatory machinery, this analysis has revealed evolutionary convergence in the classes of enriched enzymes in these structures.

A comprehensive study of the interactions in the B. subtilis degradosome with special emphasis on the role of the small proteins SR1P and SR7P

Here, we employ coelution experiments and far-western blotting to identify stable interactions between the main components of the B. subtilis degradosome and the small proteins SR1P and SR7P. Our data indicate that B. subtilis has a degradosome comprising at least RNases Y and PnpA, enolase, phosphofructokinase, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase GapA, and helicase CshA that can be co-purified without cross-linking. All interactions were corroborated by far-western blotting with proteins purified from E. coli. Previously, we discovered that stress-induced SR7P binds enolase to enhance its interaction with and activity of enolase-bound RNase Y (RnY), while SR1P transcribed under gluconeogenic conditions interacts with GapA to stimulate its interaction with and the activity of RnjA (RnjA). We show that SR1P can directly bind RnjA, RnY, and PnpA independently of GapA, whereas SR7P only interacts with enolase. Northern blotting suggests that the degradation of individual RNAs in B. subtilis under gluconeogenic or stress conditions depends on either RnjA or RnY alone or on RnjA-SR1P, RnY-SR1P, or RnY-Eno. In vitro degradation assays with RnY or RnjA substrates corroborate the in vivo role of SR1P. Currently, it is unknown which substrate property is decisive for the utilization of one of the complexes.

Caulobacter crescentus RNase E condensation contributes to autoregulation and fitness

RNase E is the most common RNA decay nuclease in bacteria, setting the global mRNA decay rate and scaffolding formation of the RNA degradosome complex and BR-bodies. To properly set the global mRNA decay rate, RNase E from Escherichia coli and neighboring γ-proteobacteria were found to autoregulate RNase E levels via the decay of its mRNA's 5' UTR. While the 5' UTR is absent from other groups of bacteria in the Rfam database, we identified that the α-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus RNase E contains a similar 5' UTR structure that promotes RNase E autoregulation. In both bacteria, the C-terminal IDR of RNase E is required for proper autoregulation to occur, and this IDR is also necessary and sufficient for RNase E to phase-separate, generating BR-bodies. Using in vitro purified RNase E, we find that the IDR's ability to promote phase-separation correlates with enhanced 5' UTR cleavage, suggesting that phase-separation of RNase E with the 5' UTR enhances autoregulation. Finally, using growth competition experiments we find that a strain capable of autoregulation rapidly outcompetes a strain with a 5' UTR mutation that cannot autoregulate, suggesting autoregulation promotes optimal cellular fitness.

RNase Y Autoregulates Its Synthesis in Bacillus subtilis

The instability of messenger RNA is crucial to the control of gene expression. In Bacillus subtilis, RNase Y is the major decay-initiating endoribonuclease. Here, we show how this key enzyme regulates its own synthesis by modulating the longevity of its mRNA. Autoregulation is achieved through cleavages in two regions of the rny (RNase Y) transcript: (i) within the first ~100 nucleotides of the open reading frame, immediately inactivating the mRNA for further rounds of translation; (ii) cleavages in the rny 5' UTR, primarily within the 5'-terminal 50 nucleotides, creating entry sites for the 5' exonuclease J1 whose progression is blocked around position -15 of the rny mRNA, potentially by initiating ribosomes. This links the functional inactivation of the transcript by RNase J1 to translation efficiency, depending on the ribosome occupancy at the translation initiation site. By these mechanisms, RNase Y can initiate degradation of its own mRNA when the enzyme is not occupied with degradation of other RNAs and thus prevent its overexpression beyond the needs of RNA metabolism.

Compartmentalization of RNA Degradosomes in Bacteria Controls Accessibility to Substrates and Ensures Concerted Degradation of mRNA to Nucleotides

RNA degradosomes are multienzyme complexes composed of ribonucleases, RNA helicases, and metabolic enzymes. RNase E-based degradosomes are widespread in Proteobacteria. The Escherichia coli RNA degradosome is sequestered from transcription in the nucleoid and translation in the cytoplasm by localization to the inner cytoplasmic membrane, where it forms short-lived clusters that are proposed to be sites of mRNA degradation. In Caulobacter crescentus, RNA degradosomes localize to ribonucleoprotein condensates in the interior of the cell [bacterial ribonucleoprotein-bodies (BR-bodies)], which have been proposed to drive the concerted degradation of mRNA to nucleotides. The turnover of mRNA in growing cells is important for maintaining pools of nucleotides for transcription and DNA replication. Membrane attachment of the E. coli RNA degradosome is necessary to avoid wasteful degradation of intermediates in ribosome assembly. Sequestering RNA degradosomes to C. crescentus BR-bodies, which exclude structured RNA, could have a similar role in protecting intermediates in ribosome assembly from degradation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 76 is September 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Stress-Induced Membraneless Organelles in Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes: Bird’s-Eye View

Stress is an inevitable part of life. An organism is exposed to multiple stresses and overcomes their negative consequences throughout its entire existence. A correlation was established between life expectancy and resistance to stress, suggesting a relationship between aging and the ability to respond to external adverse effects as well as quickly restore the normal regulation of biological processes. To combat stress, cells developed multiple pro-survival mechanisms, one of them is the assembly of special stress-induced membraneless organelles (MLOs). MLOs are formations that do not possess a lipid membrane but rather form as a result of the “liquid–liquid” phase separation (LLPS) of biopolymers. Stress-responsive MLOs were found in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, they form as a reaction to the acute environmental conditions and are dismantled after its termination. These compartments function to prevent damage to the genetic and protein material of the cell during stress. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of stress-induced MLO-like structures in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.

Y-Complex Proteins Show RNA-Dependent Binding Events at the Cell Membrane and Distinct Single-Molecule Dynamics

Bacteria are dependent on rapid alterations in gene expression. A prerequisite for rapid adaptations is efficient RNA turnover, with endonuclease RNase Y playing a crucial role in mRNA stability as well as in maturation. In Bacillus subtilis, RNase Y in turn interacts with the so-called “Y-complex” consisting of three proteins, which play important functions in sporulation, natural transformation and biofilm formation. It is thought that the Y-complex acts as an accessory factor in RNase Y regulation but might also have independent functions. Using single-molecule tracking, we show that all three Y-complex proteins exhibit three distinct mobilities, including movement through the cytosol and confined motion, predominantly at membrane-proximal sites but also within the cell center. A transcriptional arrest leads to a strong change in localization and dynamics of YmcA, YlbF and YaaT, supporting their involvement in global RNA degradation. However, Y-complex proteins show distinguishable protein dynamics, and the deletion of yaaT or ylbF shows a minor effect on the dynamics of YmcA. Cell fractionation reveals that YaaT displays a mixture of membrane association and presence in the cytosol, while YlbF and YmcA do not show direct membrane attachment. Taken together, our experiments reveal membrane-associated and membrane-independent activities of Y-complex proteins and a dynamic interplay between them with indirect membrane association of YmcA and YlbF via YaaT.

Real-Time Messenger RNA Dynamics in Bacillus subtilis

Messenger RNA molecules have been localized to different positions in cells and have been followed by time-lapse microscopy. We have used MS2-mVenus-labeled mRNA and single-particle tracking to obtain information on the dynamics of single-mRNA molecules in real time. Using single-molecule tracking, we show that several mRNA molecules visualized via two MS2-binding sites and MS2-mVenus expressed in Bacillus subtilis cells show free diffusion through the entire cell and constrained motion predominantly close to the cell membrane and at the polar regions of the cells. Because constrained motion of mRNAs likely reflects molecules complexed with ribosomes, our data support the idea that translation occurs at sites surrounding the nucleoids. Squared displacement analyses show the existence of at least two distinct populations of molecules with different diffusion constants or possibly of three populations, for example, freely mobile mRNAs, mRNAs in transition complexes, or in complex with polysomes. Diffusion constants between differently sized mRNAs did not differ dramatically and were much lower than that of cytosolic proteins. These data agree with the large size of mRNA molecules and suggest that, within the viscous cytoplasm, size variations do not translate into mobility differences. However, at observed diffusion constants, mRNA molecules would be able to reach all positions within cells in a frame of seconds. We did not observe strong differences in the location of confined motion for mRNAs encoding mostly soluble or membrane proteins, indicating that there is no strong bias for localization of membrane protein-encoding transcripts for the cell membrane.

Single molecule/particle tracking analysis program SMTracker 2.0 reveals different dynamics of proteins within the RNA degradosome complex in Bacillus subtilis

Single-molecule (particle) tracking is a powerful method to study dynamic processes in cells at highest possible spatial and temporal resolution. We have developed SMTracker, a graphical user interface for automatic quantifying, visualizing and managing of data. Version 2.0 determines distributions of positional displacements in x- and y-direction using multi-state diffusion models, discriminates between Brownian, sub- or superdiffusive behaviour, and locates slow or fast diffusing populations in a standardized cell. Using SMTracker, we show that the Bacillus subtilis RNA degradosome consists of a highly dynamic complex of RNase Y and binding partners. We found similar changes in molecule dynamics for RNase Y, CshA, PNPase and enolase, but not for phosphofructokinase, RNase J1 and J2, to inhibition of transcription. However, the absence of PfkA or of RNase J2 affected molecule dynamics of RNase Y-mVenus, indicating that these two proteins are indeed part of the degradosome. Molecule counting suggests that RNase Y is present as a dimer in cells, at an average copy number of about 500, of which 46% are present in a slow-diffusive state and thus likely engaged within degradosomes. Thus, RNase Y, CshA, PNPase and enolase likely play central roles, and RNase J1, J2 and PfkA more peripheral roles, in degradosome architecture.

Polyribosome-Dependent Clustering of Membrane-Anchored RNA Degradosomes To Form Sites of mRNA Degradation in Escherichia coli

The essential endoribonuclease RNase E, which is a component of the Escherichia coli multienzyme RNA degradosome, has a global role in RNA processing and degradation. RNase E localizes to the inner cytoplasmic membrane in small, short-lived clusters (puncta). Rifampin, which arrests transcription, inhibits RNase E clustering and increases its rate of diffusion. Here, we show that inhibition of clustering is due to the arrest of transcription using a rifampin-resistant control strain. Two components of the RNA degradosome, the 3′ exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and the DEAD box RNA helicase RhlB, colocalize with RNase E in puncta. Clustering of PNPase and RhlB is inhibited by rifampin, and their diffusion rates increase, as evidenced by in vivo photobleaching measurements. Results with rifampin treatment reported here show that RNA degradosome diffusion is constrained by interaction with RNA substrate. Kasugamycin, which arrests translation initiation, inhibits formation of puncta and increases RNA degradosome diffusion rates. Since kasugamycin treatment results in continued synthesis and turnover of ribosome-free mRNA but inhibits polyribosome formation, RNA degradosome clustering is therefore polyribosome dependent. Chloramphenicol, which arrests translation elongation, results in formation of large clusters (foci) of RNA degradosomes that are distinct from puncta. Since chloramphenicol-treated ribosomes are stable, the formation of RNA degradosome foci could be part of a stress response that protects inactive polyribosomes from degradation. Our results strongly suggest that puncta are sites where translationally active polyribosomes are captured by membrane-associated RNA degradosomes. These sites could be part of a scanning process that is an initial step in mRNA degradation.

Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation: Unraveling the Enigma of Biomolecular Condensates in Microbial Cells

Numerous examples of microbial phase-separated biomolecular condensates have now been identified following advances in fluorescence imaging and single molecule microscopy technologies. The structure, function, and potential applications of these microbial condensates are currently receiving a great deal of attention. By neatly compartmentalizing proteins and their interactors in membrane-less organizations while maintaining free communication between these macromolecules and the external environment, microbial cells are able to achieve enhanced metabolic efficiency. Typically, these condensates also possess the ability to rapidly adapt to internal and external changes. The biological functions of several phase-separated condensates in small bacterial cells show evolutionary convergence with the biological functions of their eukaryotic paralogs. Artificial microbial membrane-less organelles are being constructed with application prospects in biocatalysis, biosynthesis, and biomedicine. In this review, we provide an overview of currently known biomolecular condensates driven by liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in microbial cells, and we elaborate on their biogenesis mechanisms and biological functions. Additionally, we highlight the major challenges and future research prospects in studying microbial LLPS.

Riboregulation in bacteria: From general principles to novel mechanisms of the trp attenuator and its sRNA and peptide products

Gene expression strategies ensuring bacterial survival and competitiveness rely on cis- and trans-acting RNA-regulators (riboregulators). Among the cis-acting riboregulators are transcriptional and translational attenuators, and antisense RNAs (asRNAs). The trans-acting riboregulators are small RNAs (sRNAs) that bind proteins or base pairs with other RNAs. This classification is artificial since some regulatory RNAs act both in cis and in trans, or function in addition as small mRNAs. A prominent example is the archetypical, ribosome-dependent attenuator of tryptophan (Trp) biosynthesis genes. It responds by transcription attenuation to two signals, Trp availability and inhibition of translation, and gives rise to two trans-acting products, the attenuator sRNA rnTrpL and the leader peptide peTrpL. In Escherichia coli, rnTrpL links Trp availability to initiation of chromosome replication and in Sinorhizobium meliloti, it coordinates regulation of split tryptophan biosynthesis operons. Furthermore, in S. meliloti, peTrpL is involved in mRNA destabilization in response to antibiotic exposure. It forms two types of asRNA-containing, antibiotic-dependent ribonucleoprotein complexes (ARNPs), one of them changing the target specificity of rnTrpL. The posttranscriptional role of peTrpL indicates two emerging paradigms: (1) sRNA reprograming by small molecules and (2) direct involvement of antibiotics in regulatory RNPs. They broaden our view on RNA-based mechanisms and may inspire new approaches for studying, detecting, and using antibacterial compounds. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Small Molecule-RNA Interactions RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Regulatory RNAs.

Escherichia coli RNase E can efficiently replace RNase Y in Bacillus subtilis

RNase Y and RNase E are disparate endoribonucleases that govern global mRNA turnover/processing in the two evolutionary distant bacteria Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli, respectively. The two enzymes share a similar in vitro cleavage specificity and subcellular localization. To evaluate the potential equivalence in biological function between the two enzymes in vivo we analyzed whether and to what extent RNase E is able to replace RNase Y in B. subtilis. Full-length RNase E almost completely restores wild type growth of the rny mutant. This is matched by a surprising reversal of transcript profiles both of individual genes and on a genome-wide scale. The single most important parameter to efficient complementation is the requirement for RNase E to localize to the inner membrane while truncation of the C-terminal sequences corresponding to the degradosome scaffold has only a minor effect. We also compared the in vitro cleavage activity for the major decay initiating ribonucleases Y, E and J and show that no conclusions can be drawn with respect to their activity in vivo. Our data confirm the notion that RNase Y and RNase E have evolved through convergent evolution towards a low specificity endonuclease activity universally important in bacteria.

Regulation of Bacterial Ribonucleases

Ribonucleases (RNases) are essential for almost every aspect of RNA metabolism. However, despite their important metabolic roles, RNases can also be destructive enzymes. As a consequence, cells must carefully regulate the amount, the activity, and the localization of RNases to avoid the inappropriate degradation of essential RNA molecules. In addition, bacterial cells often must adjust RNase levels as environmental situations demand, also requiring careful regulation of these critical enzymes. As the need for strict control of RNases has become more evident, multiple mechanisms for this regulation have been identified and studied, and these are described in this review. The major conclusion that emerges is that no common regulatory mechanism applies to all RNases, or even to a family of RNases; rather, a wide variety of processes have evolved that act on these enzymes, and in some cases, multiple regulatory mechanisms can even act on a single RNase. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 75 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Moonlighting in Bacillus subtilis: The Small Proteins SR1P and SR7P Regulate the Moonlighting Activity of Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase A (GapA) and Enolase in RNA Degradation

Moonlighting proteins are proteins with more than one function. During the past 25 years, they have been found to be rather widespread in bacteria. In Bacillus subtilis, moonlighting has been disclosed to occur via DNA, protein or RNA binding or protein phosphorylation. In addition, two metabolic enzymes, enolase and phosphofructokinase, were localized in the degradosome-like network (DLN) where they were thought to be scaffolding components. The DLN comprises the major endoribonuclease RNase Y, 3'-5' exoribonuclease PnpA, endo/5'-3' exoribonucleases J1/J2 and helicase CshA. We have ascertained that the metabolic enzyme GapA is an additional component of the DLN. In addition, we identified two small proteins that bind scaffolding components of the degradosome: SR1P encoded by the dual-function sRNA SR1 binds GapA, promotes the GapA-RNase J1 interaction and increases the RNase J1 activity. SR7P encoded by the dual-function antisense RNA SR7 binds to enolase thereby enhancing the enzymatic activity of enolase bound RNase Y. We discuss the role of small proteins in modulating the activity of two moonlighting proteins.

Roles of liquid-liquid phase separation in bacterial RNA metabolism

While bacteria typically lack membrane bound organelles, the mechanisms of subcellular organization have been unclear. Bacteria have recently been found to harbor membraneless organelles containing enzymes of many biochemical pathways. These organelles, called biomolecular condensates, have been found to commonly form through the process of liquid-liquid phase separation and are typically enriched in nucleic acid binding proteins. Interestingly, eukaryote and bacterial transcription and RNA decay machinery have been found to form biomolecular condensates. Additionally, DEAD Box ATPases from eukaryotes and bacteria have also been found to modulate biomolecular condensates. The shared ability of RNA metabolic enzymes to assemble into biomolecular condensates across domains suggests that this mode of subcellular organization aids in the control of RNA metabolism.

Comparison of Current Methods for Signal Peptide Prediction in Phytoplasmas

Although phytoplasma studies are still hampered by the lack of axenic cultivation methods, the availability of genome sequences allowed dramatic advances in the characterization of the virulence mechanisms deployed by phytoplasmas, and highlighted the detection of signal peptides as a crucial step to identify effectors secreted by phytoplasmas. However, various signal peptide prediction methods have been used to mine phytoplasma genomes, and no general evaluation of these methods is available so far for phytoplasma sequences. In this work, we compared the prediction performance of SignalP versions 3.0, 4.0, 4.1, 5.0 and Phobius on several sequence datasets originating from all deposited phytoplasma sequences. SignalP 4.1 with specific parameters showed the most exhaustive and consistent prediction ability. However, the configuration of SignalP 4.1 for increased sensitivity induced a much higher rate of false positives on transmembrane domains located at N-terminus. Moreover, sensitive signal peptide predictions could similarly be achieved by the transmembrane domain prediction ability of TMHMM and Phobius, due to the relatedness between signal peptides and transmembrane regions. Beyond the results presented herein, the datasets assembled in this study form a valuable benchmark to compare and evaluate signal peptide predictors in a field where experimental evidence of secretion is scarce. Additionally, this study illustrates the utility of comparative genomics to strengthen confidence in bioinformatic predictions.

Phase-separated bacterial ribonucleoprotein bodies organize mRNA decay

In bacteria, mRNA decay is controlled by megadalton scale macromolecular assemblies called, "RNA degradosomes," composed of nucleases and other RNA decay associated proteins. Recent advances in bacterial cell biology have shown that RNA degradosomes can assemble into phase-separated structures, termed bacterial ribonucleoprotein bodies (BR-bodies), with many analogous properties to eukaryotic processing bodies and stress granules. This review will highlight the functional role that BR-bodies play in the mRNA decay process through its organization into a membraneless organelle in the bacterial cytoplasm. This review will also highlight the phylogenetic distribution of BR-bodies across bacterial species, which suggests that these phase-separated structures are broadly distributed across bacteria, and in evolutionarily related mitochondria and chloroplasts. This article is categorized under: RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes RNA Export and Localization > RNA Localization RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Regulation of RNA Stability.

The RNase J-Based RNA Degradosome Is Compartmentalized in the Gastric Pathogen Helicobacter pylori

Posttranscriptional regulation is a major level of gene expression control in any cell. In bacteria, multiprotein machines called RNA degradosomes are central for RNA processing and degradation, and some were reported to be compartmentalized inside these organelleless cells. The minimal RNA degradosome of the important gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori is composed of the essential ribonuclease RNase J and RhpA, its sole DEAD box RNA helicase, and plays a major role in the regulation of mRNA decay and adaptation to gastric colonization. Here, the subcellular localization of the H. pylori RNA degradosome was investigated using cellular fractionation and both confocal and superresolution microscopy. We established that RNase J and RhpA are peripheral inner membrane proteins and that this association was mediated neither by ribosomes nor by RNA nor by the RNase Y membrane protein. In live H. pylori cells, we observed that fluorescent RNase J and RhpA protein fusions assemble into nonpolar foci. We identified factors that regulate the formation of these foci without affecting the degradosome membrane association. Flotillin, a bacterial membrane scaffolding protein, and free RNA promote focus formation in H. pylori Finally, RNase J-GFP (RNase J-green fluorescent protein) molecules and foci in cells were quantified by three-dimensional (3D) single-molecule fluorescence localization microscopy. The number and size of the RNase J foci were found to be scaled with growth phase and cell volume as previously reported for eukaryotic ribonucleoprotein granules. In conclusion, we propose that membrane compartmentalization and the regulated clustering of RNase J-based degradosome hubs represent important levels of control of their activity and specificity.IMPORTANCE Helicobacter pylori is a bacterial pathogen that chronically colonizes the stomach of half of the human population worldwide. Infection by H. pylori can lead to the development of gastric pathologies such as ulcers and adenocarcinoma, which causes up to 800,000 deaths in the world each year. Persistent colonization by H. pylori relies on regulation of the expression of adaptation-related genes. One major level of such control is posttranscriptional regulation, which, in H. pylori, largely relies on a multiprotein molecular machine, an RNA degradosome, that we previously discovered. In this study, we established that the two protein partners of this machine are associated with the membrane of H. pylori Using cutting-edge microscopy, we showed that these complexes assemble into hubs whose formation is regulated by free RNA and scaled with bacterial size and growth phase. Organelleless cellular compartmentalization of molecular machines into hubs emerges as an important regulatory level in bacteria.

Regulation of mRNA Stability During Bacterial Stress Responses

Bacteria have a remarkable ability to sense environmental changes, swiftly regulating their transcriptional and posttranscriptional machinery as a response. Under conditions that cause growth to slow or stop, bacteria typically stabilize their transcriptomes in what has been shown to be a conserved stress response. In recent years, diverse studies have elucidated many of the mechanisms underlying mRNA degradation, yet an understanding of the regulation of mRNA degradation under stress conditions remains elusive. In this review we discuss the diverse mechanisms that have been shown to affect mRNA stability in bacteria. While many of these mechanisms are transcript-specific, they provide insight into possible mechanisms of global mRNA stabilization. To that end, we have compiled information on how mRNA fate is affected by RNA secondary structures; interaction with ribosomes, RNA binding proteins, and small RNAs; RNA base modifications; the chemical nature of 5' ends; activity and concentration of RNases and other degradation proteins; mRNA and RNase localization; and the stringent response. We also provide an analysis of reported relationships between mRNA abundance and mRNA stability, and discuss the importance of stress-associated mRNA stabilization as a potential target for therapeutic development.

RNA localization in prokaryotes: Where, when, how, and why

Only recently has it been recognized that the transcriptome of bacteria and archaea can be spatiotemporally regulated. All types of prokaryotic transcripts-rRNAs, tRNAs, mRNAs, and regulatory RNAs-may acquire specific localization and these patterns can be temporally regulated. In some cases bacterial RNAs reside in the vicinity of the transcription site, but in many others, transcripts show distinct localizations to the cytoplasm, the inner membrane, or the pole of rod-shaped species. This localization, which often overlaps with that of the encoded proteins, can be achieved either in a translation-dependent or translation-independent fashion. The latter implies that RNAs carry sequence-level features that determine their final localization with the aid of RNA-targeting factors. Localization of transcripts regulates their posttranscriptional fate by affecting their degradation and processing, translation efficiency, sRNA-mediated regulation, and/or propensity to undergo RNA modifications. By facilitating complex assembly and liquid-liquid phase separation, RNA localization is not only a consequence but also a driver of subcellular spatiotemporal complexity. We foresee that in the coming years the study of RNA localization in prokaryotes will produce important novel insights regarding the fundamental understanding of membrane-less subcellular organization and lead to practical outputs with biotechnological and therapeutic implications. This article is categorized under: RNA Export and Localization > RNA Localization Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Regulatory RNAs RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.