1
|
Prenatal cocaine exposure impairs cognitive function of progeny via insulin growth factor II epigenetic regulation. Neurobiol Dis 2015; 82:54-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2015] [Revised: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
2
|
Koppes E, Himes KP, Chaillet JR. Partial Loss of Genomic Imprinting Reveals Important Roles for Kcnq1 and Peg10 Imprinted Domains in Placental Development. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0135202. [PMID: 26241757 PMCID: PMC4524636 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Mutations in imprinted genes or their imprint control regions (ICRs) produce changes in imprinted gene expression and distinct abnormalities in placental structure, indicating the importance of genomic imprinting to placental development. We have recently shown that a very broad spectrum of placental abnormalities associated with altered imprinted gene expression occurs in the absence of the oocyte-derived DNMT1o cytosine methyltransferase, which normally maintains parent-specific imprinted methylation during preimplantation. The absence of DNMT1o partially reduces inherited imprinted methylation while retaining the genetic integrity of imprinted genes and their ICRs. Using this novel system, we undertook a broad and inclusive approach to identifying key ICRs involved in placental development by correlating loss of imprinted DNA methylation with abnormal placental phenotypes in a mid-gestation window (E12.5-E15.5). To these ends we measured DNA CpG methylation at 15 imprinted gametic differentially methylated domains (gDMDs) that overlap known ICRs using EpiTYPER-mass array technology, and linked these epigenetic measurements to histomorphological defects. Methylation of some imprinted gDMDs, most notably Dlk1, was nearly normal in mid-gestation DNMT1o-deficient placentas, consistent with the notion that cells having lost methylation on these DMDs do not contribute significantly to placental development. Most imprinted gDMDs however showed a wide range of methylation loss among DNMT1o-deficient placentas. Two striking associations were observed. First, loss of DNA methylation at the Peg10 imprinted gDMD associated with decreased embryonic viability and decreased labyrinthine volume. Second, loss of methylation at the Kcnq1 imprinted gDMD was strongly associated with trophoblast giant cell (TGC) expansion. We conclude that the Peg10 and Kcnq1 ICRs are key regulators of mid-gestation placental function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Koppes
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Program in Integrative Molecular Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Katherine P. Himes
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - J. Richard Chaillet
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McGraw S, Zhang JX, Farag M, Chan D, Caron M, Konermann C, Oakes CC, Mohan KN, Plass C, Pastinen T, Bourque G, Chaillet JR, Trasler JM. Transient DNMT1 suppression reveals hidden heritable marks in the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:1485-97. [PMID: 25578964 PMCID: PMC4330356 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome-wide demethylation and remethylation of DNA during early embryogenesis is essential for development. Imprinted germline differentially methylated domains (gDMDs) established by sex-specific methylation in either male or female germ cells, must escape these dynamic changes and sustain precise inheritance of both methylated and unmethylated parental alleles. To identify other, gDMD-like sequences with the same epigenetic inheritance properties, we used a modified embryonic stem (ES) cell line that emulates the early embryonic demethylation and remethylation waves. Transient DNMT1 suppression revealed gDMD-like sequences requiring continuous DNMT1 activity to sustain a highly methylated state. Remethylation of these sequences was also compromised in vivo in a mouse model of transient DNMT1 loss in the preimplantation embryo. These novel regions, possessing heritable epigenetic features similar to imprinted-gDMDs are required for normal physiological and developmental processes and when disrupted are associated with disorders such as cancer and autism spectrum disorders. This study presents new perspectives on DNA methylation heritability during early embryo development that extend beyond conventional imprinted-gDMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serge McGraw
- Departments of Pediatrics, Human Genetics and Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at the Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC H3Z 2Z3, Canada
| | - Jacques X Zhang
- Departments of Pediatrics, Human Genetics and Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at the Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC H3Z 2Z3, Canada
| | - Mena Farag
- Departments of Pediatrics, Human Genetics and Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at the Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC H3Z 2Z3, Canada
| | - Donovan Chan
- Departments of Pediatrics, Human Genetics and Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at the Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC H3Z 2Z3, Canada
| | - Maxime Caron
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 1A4, Canada
| | - Carolin Konermann
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Christopher C Oakes
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - K Naga Mohan
- Department of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad 500 078, India
| | - Christoph Plass
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Tomi Pastinen
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 1A4, Canada
| | - Guillaume Bourque
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC H3A 1A4, Canada
| | - J Richard Chaillet
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3005, USA
| | - Jacquetta M Trasler
- Departments of Pediatrics, Human Genetics and Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at the Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC H3Z 2Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The DNMT1 intrinsically disordered domain regulates genomic methylation during development. Genetics 2014; 199:533-41. [PMID: 25533200 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.173609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The DNMT1 cytosine methyltransferase enzyme contains a large ∼300-aa intrinsically disordered domain (IDD) that we previously showed regulated DNA methylation patterns in mouse ES cells. Here we generated seven mouse lines with different mutations in the IDD. Homozygous mutant mice of five lines developed normally, with normal levels of methylation on both imprinted and nonimprinted DNA sequences. The other two lines, however, had alterations in imprinted and/or nonimprinted (global) DNA methylation appearing during embryonic development. Embryos of one line expressing a DNMT1 variant containing a 6-aa rat orthologous sequence in the IDD maintained imprinted methylation, showed very reduced levels of global methylation and occasionally completed fetal development. These in vivo studies demonstrate that at least two DNMT1-dependent methylation processes can be distinguished during fetal development. One process maintains the bulk of genomic methylation on nonimprinted sequences. The other process maintains methylation on a much smaller class of sequences including but not limited to gametic differentially methylated domains (gDMDs) that transmit essential imprinted parent-specific methylation for embryonic development.
Collapse
|
5
|
Uchiyama K, Watanabe D, Hayasaka M, Hanaoka K. A novel imprinted transgene located near a repetitive element that exhibits allelic imbalance in DNA methylation during early development. Dev Growth Differ 2014; 56:653-68. [PMID: 25389047 DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Revised: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A mouse line carrying a lacZ transgene driven by the human EEF1A1/EF1 alpha promoter was established. Although the promoter is known to show ubiquitous activity, only paternal transgene alleles were expressed, resulting in a transgene imprinting. At mid-gestation, the promoter sequence was differentially methylated, hypomethylated for paternal and hypermethylated for maternal alleles. In germline, the promoter was a typical differentially methylated region. After fertilization, however, both alleles were hypermethylated. Thus, the differential methylation of the promoter required for transgene imprinting was re-established during later embryonic development independently of the germline differential methylation. Furthermore, also a retroelement promoter closely-flanking imprinted transgene and its wild type counterpart displayed similar differential methylation during early development. The retroelement promoter was methylated differentially also in germline, but in an opposite pattern to the embryonic differential methylation. These results suggest that there might be an unknown epigenetic regulation inducing transgene imprinting independently of DNA methylation in the transgene insertion site. Then, besides CpG dinucleotides, non-CpG cytosines of the retroelement promoter were highly methylated especially in the transgene-active mid-gestational embryos, suggesting that an unusual epigenetic regulation might protect the active transgene against de novo methylation occurring generally in mid-gestational embryo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Uchiyama
- Molecular Embryology, Department of Biosciences, School of Science, Kitasato University, Sagamihara-Shi, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Somm E, Stouder C, Paoloni-Giacobino A. Effect of developmental dioxin exposure on methylation and expression of specific imprinted genes in mice. Reprod Toxicol 2013; 35:150-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2012] [Revised: 10/12/2012] [Accepted: 10/30/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
7
|
Koerner MV, Pauler FM, Hudson QJ, Santoro F, Sawicka A, Guenzl PM, Stricker SH, Schichl YM, Latos PA, Klement RM, Warczok KE, Wojciechowski J, Seiser C, Kralovics R, Barlow DP. A downstream CpG island controls transcript initiation and elongation and the methylation state of the imprinted Airn macro ncRNA promoter. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1002540. [PMID: 22396659 PMCID: PMC3291542 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2011] [Accepted: 12/29/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A CpG island (CGI) lies at the 5' end of the Airn macro non-protein-coding (nc) RNA that represses the flanking Igf2r promoter in cis on paternally inherited chromosomes. In addition to being modified on maternally inherited chromosomes by a DNA methylation imprint, the Airn CGI shows two unusual organization features: its position immediately downstream of the Airn promoter and transcription start site and a series of tandem direct repeats (TDRs) occupying its second half. The physical separation of the Airn promoter from the CGI provides a model to investigate if the CGI plays distinct transcriptional and epigenetic roles. We used homologous recombination to generate embryonic stem cells carrying deletions at the endogenous locus of the entire CGI or just the TDRs. The deleted Airn alleles were analyzed by using an ES cell imprinting model that recapitulates the onset of Igf2r imprinted expression in embryonic development or by using knock-out mice. The results show that the CGI is required for efficient Airn initiation and to maintain the unmethylated state of the Airn promoter, which are both necessary for Igf2r repression on the paternal chromosome. The TDRs occupying the second half of the CGI play a minor role in Airn transcriptional elongation or processivity, but are essential for methylation on the maternal Airn promoter that is necessary for Igf2r to be expressed from this chromosome. Together the data indicate the existence of a class of regulatory CGIs in the mammalian genome that act downstream of the promoter and transcription start.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha V. Koerner
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian M. Pauler
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Quanah J. Hudson
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Federica Santoro
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Sawicka
- Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp M. Guenzl
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan H. Stricker
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yvonne M. Schichl
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paulina A. Latos
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth M. Klement
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katarzyna E. Warczok
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jacek Wojciechowski
- IMP/IMBA Transgenic Service, Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Seiser
- Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Kralovics
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Denise P. Barlow
- CeMM–Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Smallwood SA, Tomizawa SI, Krueger F, Ruf N, Carli N, Segonds-Pichon A, Sato S, Hata K, Andrews SR, Kelsey G. Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat Genet 2011; 43:811-4. [PMID: 21706000 PMCID: PMC3146050 DOI: 10.1038/ng.864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 490] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2011] [Accepted: 05/25/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Elucidating how and to what extent CpG islands (CGIs) are methylated in germ cells is essential to understand genomic imprinting and epigenetic reprogramming. Here we present, to our knowledge, the first integrated epigenomic analysis of mammalian oocytes, identifying over a thousand CGIs methylated in mature oocytes. We show that these CGIs depend on DNMT3A and DNMT3L but are not distinct at the sequence level, including in CpG periodicity. They are preferentially located within active transcription units and are relatively depleted in H3K4me3, supporting a general transcription-dependent mechanism of methylation. Very few methylated CGIs are fully protected from post-fertilization reprogramming but, notably, the majority show incomplete demethylation in embryonic day (E) 3.5 blastocysts. Our study shows that CGI methylation in gametes is not entirely related to genomic imprinting but is a strong factor in determining methylation status in preimplantation embryos, suggesting a need to reassess mechanisms of post-fertilization demethylation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
DMAP1 (DNMT1-associated protein 1) is a member of the TIP60-p400 complex that maintains embryonic stem (ES) cell pluripotency and a complex containing the somatic form of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1s). DMAP1 interacts with DNMT1s through a domain that is absent in Dnmt1(V)(/)(V) mice expressing just the oocyte form (DNMT1o). A Dmap1-null allele was generated to study the role of DMAP1 in development. Consistent with the phenotypes of loss of other members of the TIP60-p400 complex, Dmap1(-/-) mice died during preimplantation in both Dnmt1(+/+) and Dnmt1(V)(/)(V) backgrounds. Unexpectedly, in the Dnmt1(V)(/)(V) background, Dmap1(+/-) parents produced mainly Dmap1(+/-) mice. Most Dmap1(+/+) progeny died during midgestation, with loss of DNA methylation on imprinted genes, suggesting that DMAP1 influences maintenance methylation mediated by DNMT1o. In this regard, a DMAP1-DNMT1o complex was detected in ES cells when DNMT1o was stably expressed but not when transiently expressed, indicating a novel interaction between DMAP1 and DNMT1o. These results suggest that DMAP1-DNMT1s and DMAP1-DNMT1o interactions are essential for normal development and that DMAP1-DNMT1o complexes are not readily formed in the embryo. Therefore, DMAP1 mediates distinct preimplantation epigenetic reprogramming processes: TIP60-p400 nucleosome remodeling and DNMT1 maintenance methylation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stouder C, Somm E, Paoloni-Giacobino A. Prenatal exposure to ethanol: a specific effect on the H19 gene in sperm. Reprod Toxicol 2011; 31:507-12. [PMID: 21382472 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2010] [Revised: 01/17/2011] [Accepted: 02/28/2011] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol exposure during pregnancy induces a range of disorders in the offspring. Methylation changes in imprinted genes may play a role in the teratogenic effects of alcohol. We evaluated the possible effects of alcohol administration in pregnant mice on the methylation pattern of 5 imprinted genes (H19, Gtl2, Peg1, Snrpn and Peg3) in somatic and sperm cell DNAs of the male offspring. The effects observed were a 3% (p < 0.005) decrease in the number of methylated CpGs of H19 in the F1 offspring sperm, a 4% (p < 0.005) decrease in the number of methylated CpGs of H19 in the F2 offspring brain and a 26% (p < 0.05) decrease in the mean sperm concentration. CpGs 1 and 2 of the H19 CTCF-binding site 2 exhibited significant methylation percentage losses. H19 CTCF-binding sites are important for the regulation of Igf2 gene expression. The hypomethylation of H19 may contribute to the decreased spermatogenesis in the offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Stouder
- Department of Genetic and Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tomizawa SI, Kobayashi H, Watanabe T, Andrews S, Hata K, Kelsey G, Sasaki H. Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. Development 2011; 138:811-20. [PMID: 21247965 DOI: 10.1242/dev.061416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Mammalian imprinted genes are associated with differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that are CpG methylated on one of the two parental chromosomes. In mice, at least 21 DMRs acquire differential methylation in the germline and many of them act as imprint centres. We previously reported the physical extents of differential methylation at 15 DMRs in mouse embryos at 12.5 days postcoitum. To reveal the ontogeny of differential methylation, we determined and compared methylation patterns of the corresponding regions in sperm and oocytes. We found that the extent of the gametic DMRs differs significantly from that of the embryonic DMRs, especially in the case of paternal gametic DMRs. These results suggest that the gametic DMR sequences should be used to extract the features specifying methylation imprint establishment in the germline: from this analysis, we noted that the maternal gametic DMRs appear as unmethylated islands in male germ cells, which suggests a novel component in the mechanism of gamete-specific marking. Analysis of selected DMRs in blastocysts revealed dynamic changes in allelic methylation in early development, indicating that DMRs are not fully protected from the major epigenetic reprogramming events occurring during preimplantation development. Furthermore, we observed non-CpG methylation in oocytes, but not in sperm, which disappeared by the blastocyst stage. Non-CpG methylation was frequently found at maternally methylated DMRs as well as non-DMR regions, suggesting its prevalence in the oocyte genome. These results provide evidence for a unique methylation profile in oocytes and reveal the surprisingly dynamic nature of DMRs in the early embryo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-ichi Tomizawa
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Integrated Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Mishima, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sharp AJ, Migliavacca E, Dupre Y, Stathaki E, Sailani MR, Baumer A, Schinzel A, Mackay DJ, Robinson DO, Cobellis G, Cobellis L, Brunner HG, Steiner B, Antonarakis SE. Methylation profiling in individuals with uniparental disomy identifies novel differentially methylated regions on chromosome 15. Genome Res 2010; 20:1271-8. [PMID: 20631049 DOI: 10.1101/gr.108597.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The maternal and paternal genomes possess distinct epigenetic marks that distinguish them at imprinted loci. In order to identify imprinted loci, we used a novel method, taking advantage of the fact that uniparental disomy (UPD) provides a system that allows the two parental chromosomes to be studied independently. We profiled the paternal and maternal methylation on chromosome 15 using immunoprecipitation of methylated DNA and hybridization to tiling oligonucleotide arrays. Comparison of six individuals with maternal versus paternal UPD15 revealed 12 differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Putative DMRs were validated by bisulfite sequencing, confirming the presence of parent-of-origin-specific methylation marks. We detected DMRs associated with known imprinted genes within the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome region, such as SNRPN and MAGEL2, validating this as a method of detecting imprinted loci. Of the 12 DMRs identified, eight were novel, some of which are associated with genes not previously thought to be imprinted. These include a site within intron 2 of IGF1R at 15q26.3, a gene that plays a fundamental role in growth, and an intergenic site upstream of GABRG3 that lies within a previously defined candidate region conferring an increased maternal risk of psychosis. These data provide a map of parent-of-origin-specific epigenetic modifications on chromosome 15, identifying DNA elements that may play a functional role in the imprinting process. Application of this methodology to other chromosomes for which UPD has been reported will allow the systematic identification of imprinted sites throughout the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Sharp
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Identification of a region of the DNMT1 methyltransferase that regulates the maintenance of genomic imprints. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:20806-11. [PMID: 19923434 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905668106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Reprogramming of DNA methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development involves the concurrent maintenance of methylation on differentially methylated domains (DMDs) of imprinted genes and a marked reduction of global (non-DMD) genomic methylation. In the developing mammalian embryo, one allele of a DMD is unmethylated, and the opposite parental allele is methylated, having inherited this methylation from the parental gamete. The maintenance of DMDs is important for monoallelic imprinted gene expression and normal development of the embryo. Because the DNMT1 cytosine methyltransferase governs maintenance methylation in mammals, rearrangements of non-DMD, but not DMD methylation in preimplantation embryos suggest that the preimplantation DNMT1-dependent maintenance mechanism specifically targets DMD sequences. We explored this possibility using an engineered mouse ES cell line to screen for mutant DNMT1 proteins that protect against the loss of DMD and/or global (non-DMD) methylation in the absence of the wild-type endogenous DNMT1 methyltransferase. We identified DNMT1 mutants that were defective in maintenance of either DMD and/or non-DMD methylation. Among these, one mutant maintained non-DMD methylation but not imprinted DMD methylation and another mutant maintained just DMD methylation. The mutated amino acids of these mutants reside in a mammal-specific, disordered region near the amino terminus of DNMT1. These findings suggest that DNMT1 participates in epigenetic reprogramming through its ability to distinguish different categories of methylated sequences.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kacem S, Feil R. Chromatin mechanisms in genomic imprinting. Mamm Genome 2009; 20:544-56. [PMID: 19760321 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-009-9223-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2009] [Accepted: 08/17/2009] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Mammalian imprinted genes are clustered in chromosomal domains. Their mono-allelic, parent-of-origin-specific expression is regulated by imprinting control regions (ICRs), which are essential sequence elements marked by DNA methylation on one of the two parental alleles. These methylation "imprints" are established during gametogenesis and, after fertilization, are somatically maintained throughout development. Nonhistone proteins and histone modifications contribute to this epigenetic process. The way ICRs mediate imprinted gene expression differs between domains. At some domains, for instance, ICRs produce long noncoding RNAs that mediate chromatin silencing. Lysine methylation on histone H3 is involved in this developmental process and is particularly important for imprinting in the placenta and brain. Together, the newly discovered chromatin mechanisms provide further clues for addressing imprinting-related pathologies in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slim Kacem
- CNRS and University of Montpellier I and II, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dindot SV, Person R, Strivens M, Garcia R, Beaudet AL. Epigenetic profiling at mouse imprinted gene clusters reveals novel epigenetic and genetic features at differentially methylated regions. Genome Res 2009; 19:1374-83. [PMID: 19542493 DOI: 10.1101/gr.089185.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Genomic imprinting arises from allele-specific epigenetic modifications that are established during gametogenesis and that are maintained throughout somatic development. These parental-specific modifications include DNA methylation and post-translational modifications to histones, which create allele-specific active and repressive domains at imprinted regions. Through the use of a high-density genomic tiling array, we generated DNA and histone methylation profiles at 11 imprinted gene clusters in the mouse from DNA and from chromatin immunoprecipitated from sperm, heart, and cerebellum. Our analysis revealed that despite high levels of differential DNA methylation at non-CpG islands within these regions, imprinting control regions (ICRs) and secondary differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified by an overlapping pattern of H3K4 trimethylation (active chromatin) and H3K9 trimethylation (repressive chromatin) modifications in somatic tissue, and a sperm differentially methylated region (sDMR; sperm not equal somatic tissue). Using these features as a common signature of DMRs, we identified 11 unique regions that mapped to known imprinted genes, to uncharacterized genes, and to intergenic regions flanking known imprinted genes. A common feature among these regions was the presence of a CpG island and an array of tandem repeats. Collectively, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation and histone H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 modifications at imprinted gene clusters, and identifies common epigenetic and genetic features of regions regulating genomic imprinting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott V Dindot
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koerner MV, Pauler FM, Huang R, Barlow DP. The function of non-coding RNAs in genomic imprinting. Development 2009; 136:1771-83. [PMID: 19429783 PMCID: PMC2847617 DOI: 10.1242/dev.030403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that regulate gene expression in cis or in trans are a shared feature of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. In mammals, cis-acting functions are associated with macro ncRNAs, which can be several hundred thousand nucleotides long. Imprinted ncRNAs are well-studied macro ncRNAs that have cis-regulatory effects on multiple flanking genes. Recent advances indicate that they employ different downstream mechanisms to regulate gene expression in embryonic and placental tissues. A better understanding of these downstream mechanisms will help to improve our general understanding of the function of ncRNAs throughout the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha V Koerner
- Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Dr Bohr-Gasse 9/4, Vienna Biocenter, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chotalia M, Smallwood SA, Ruf N, Dawson C, Lucifero D, Frontera M, James K, Dean W, Kelsey G. Transcription is required for establishment of germline methylation marks at imprinted genes. Genes Dev 2009; 23:105-17. [PMID: 19136628 DOI: 10.1101/gad.495809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 238] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Genomic imprinting requires the differential marking by DNA methylation of genes in male and female gametes. In the female germline, acquisition of methylation imprint marks depends upon the de novo methyltransferase Dnmt3a and its cofactor Dnmt3L, but the reasons why specific sequences are targets for Dnmt3a and Dnmt3L are still poorly understood. Here, we investigate the role of transcription in establishing maternal germline methylation marks. We show that at the Gnas locus, truncating transcripts from the furthest upstream Nesp promoter disrupts oocyte-derived methylation of the differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Transcription through DMRs in oocytes is not restricted to this locus but occurs across the prospective DMRs at many other maternally marked imprinted domains, suggesting a common requirement for transcription events. The transcripts implicated here in gametic methylation are protein-coding, in contrast to the noncoding antisense transcripts involved in the monoallelic silencing of imprinted genes in somatic tissues, although they often initiate from alternative promoters in oocytes. We propose that transcription is a third essential component of the de novo methylation system, which includes optimal CpG spacing and histone modifications, and may be required to create or maintain open chromatin domains to allow the methylation complex access to its preferred targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mita Chotalia
- Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
DNA methyltransferase 1o functions during preimplantation development to preclude a profound level of epigenetic variation. Dev Biol 2008; 324:139-50. [PMID: 18845137 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2008] [Revised: 09/12/2008] [Accepted: 09/15/2008] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Most mouse embryos developing in the absence of the oocyte-derived DNA methyltransferase 1o (DNMT1o-deficient embryos) have significant delays in development and a wide range of anatomical abnormalities. To understand the timing and molecular basis of such variation, we studied pre- and post-implantation DNA methylation as a gauge of epigenetic variation among these embryos. DNMT1o-deficient embryos showed extensive differences in the levels of methylation in differentially methylated domains (DMDs) of imprinted genes at the 8-cell stage. Because of independent assortment of the methylated and unmethylated chromatids created by the loss of DNMT1o, the deficient embryos were found to be mosaics of cells with different, but stable epigenotypes (DNA methylation patterns). Our results suggest that loss of DNMT1o in just one cell cycle is responsible for the extensive variation in the epigenotypes in both embryos and their associated extraembryonic tissues. Thus, the maternal-effect DNMT1o protein is uniquely poised during development to normally ensure uniform parental methylation patterns at DMDs.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Among the persistent mysteries in epigenetics are the criteria by which specific regions of the genome are chosen for deposition of distinguishing chromatin marks. Once a particular region is modified, will the newly acquired epigenetic state spill onto neighboring regions of the genome or be confined to tidy patches? The report by Henderson and Jacobsen in the the previous issue of Genes & Development (1597-1606) addresses these questions while providing insight into the utility of DNA methylation for a eukaryotic genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Ryun Woo
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Keverne EB, Curley JP. Epigenetics, brain evolution and behaviour. Front Neuroendocrinol 2008; 29:398-412. [PMID: 18439660 DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2008.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2007] [Revised: 11/30/2007] [Accepted: 03/01/2008] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Molecular modifications to the structure of histone proteins and DNA (chromatin) play a significant role in regulating the transcription of genes without altering their nucleotide sequence. Certain epigenetic modifications to DNA are heritable in the form of genomic imprinting, whereby subsets of genes are silenced according to parent-of-origin. This form of gene regulation is primarily under matrilineal control and has evolved partly to co-ordinate in-utero development with maternal resource availability. Changes to epigenetic mechanisms in post-mitotic neurons may also be activated during development in response to environmental stimuli such as maternal care and social interactions. This results in long-lasting stable, or short-term dynamic, changes to the neuronal phenotype producing long-term behavioural consequences. Use of evolutionary conserved mechanisms have thus been adapted to modify the control of gene expression and embryonic growth of the brain as well as allowing for plastic changes in the post-natal brain in response to external environmental and social cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric B Keverne
- Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, Cambridge, CB23 8AA, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Novikova SI, He F, Bai J, Cutrufello NJ, Lidow MS, Undieh AS. Maternal cocaine administration in mice alters DNA methylation and gene expression in hippocampal neurons of neonatal and prepubertal offspring. PLoS One 2008; 3:e1919. [PMID: 18382688 PMCID: PMC2271055 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2007] [Accepted: 02/11/2008] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous studies documented significant behavioral changes in the offspring of cocaine-exposed mothers. We now explore the hypothesis that maternal cocaine exposure could alter the fetal epigenetic machinery sufficiently to cause lasting neurochemical and functional changes in the offspring. Pregnant CD1 mice were administered either saline or 20 mg/kg cocaine twice daily on gestational days 8–19. Male pups from each of ten litters of the cocaine and control groups were analyzed at 3 (P3) or 30 (P30) days postnatum. Global DNA methylation, methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by CGI2 microarray profiling and bisulfite sequencing, as well as quantitative real-time RT-PCR gene expression analysis, were evaluated in hippocampal pyramidal neurons excised by laser capture microdissection. Following maternal cocaine exposure, global DNA methylation was significantly decreased at P3 and increased at P30. Among the 492 CGIs whose methylation was significantly altered by cocaine at P3, 34% were hypermethylated while 66% were hypomethylated. Several of these CGIs contained promoter regions for genes implicated in crucial cellular functions. Endogenous expression of selected genes linked to the abnormally methylated CGIs was correspondingly decreased or increased by as much as 4–19-fold. By P30, some of the cocaine-associated effects at P3 endured, reversed to opposite directions, or disappeared. Further, additional sets of abnormally methylated targets emerged at P30 that were not observed at P3. Taken together, these observations indicate that maternal cocaine exposure during the second and third trimesters of gestation could produce potentially profound structural and functional modifications in the epigenomic programs of neonatal and prepubertal mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana I. Novikova
- Laboratory of Neurogenomics and Proteomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuropharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Fang He
- Laboratory of Neurogenomics and Proteomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jie Bai
- Laboratory of Neurogenomics and Proteomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nicholas J. Cutrufello
- Laboratory of Neurogenomics and Proteomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Michael S. Lidow
- Laboratory of Neurogenomics and Proteomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Ashiwel S. Undieh
- Laboratory of Integrative Neuropharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fortier AL, Lopes FL, Darricarrère N, Martel J, Trasler JM. Superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the midgestation mouse placenta. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17:1653-65. [PMID: 18287259 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddn055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Imprinted genes play important roles in embryonic growth and development as well as in placental function. Many imprinted genes acquire their epigenetic marks during oocyte growth, and this period may be susceptible to epigenetic disruption following hormonal stimulation. Superovulation has been shown to affect growth and development of the embryo, but an effect on imprinted genes has not been shown in postimplantation embryos. In the present study, we examined the effect of superovulation/in vivo development or superovulation/3.5dpc (days post-coitum) embryo transfer on the allelic expression of Snrpn, Kcnq1ot1 and H19 in embryos and placentas at 9.5 days of gestation. Superovulation followed by in vivo development resulted in biallelic expression of Snrpn and H19 in 9.5dpc placentas while Kcnq1ot1 was not affected; in the embryos, there was normal monoallelic expression of the three imprinted genes. We did not observe significant DNA methylation perturbations in the differentially methylated regions of Snrpn or H19. Superovulation followed by embryo transfer at 3.5dpc resulted in biallelic expression of H19 in the placenta. The expression of an important growth factor closely linked to H19, Insulin-like growth factor-II, was increased in the placenta following superovulation with or without embryo transfer. These results show that both maternally and paternally methylated imprinted genes were affected, suggesting that superovulation compromises oocyte quality and interferes with the maintenance of imprinting during preimplantation development. Our findings contribute to the evidence that mechanisms for maintaining imprinting are less robust in trophectoderm-derived tissues, and have clinical implications for the screening of patients following assisted reproduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L Fortier
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal Children's Hospital Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Linhart HG, Lin H, Yamada Y, Moran E, Steine EJ, Gokhale S, Lo G, Cantu E, Ehrich M, He T, Meissner A, Jaenisch R. Dnmt3b promotes tumorigenesis in vivo by gene-specific de novo methylation and transcriptional silencing. Genes Dev 2007; 21:3110-22. [PMID: 18056424 PMCID: PMC2081977 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1594007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2007] [Accepted: 10/11/2007] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Increased methylation of CpG islands and silencing of affected target genes is frequently found in human cancer; however, in vivo the question of causality has only been addressed by loss-of-function studies. To directly evaluate the role and mechanism of de novo methylation in tumor development, we overexpressed the de novo DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a1 and Dnmt3b1 in Apc Min/+ mice. We found that Dnmt3b1 enhanced the number of colon tumors in Apc Min/+ mice approximately twofold and increased the average size of colonic microadenomas, whereas Dnmt3a1 had no effect. The overexpression of Dnmt3b1 caused loss of imprinting and increased expression of Igf2 as well as methylation and transcriptional silencing of the tumor suppressor genes Sfrp2, Sfrp4, and Sfrp5. Importantly, we found that Dnmt3b1 but not Dnmt3a1 efficiently methylates the same set of genes in tumors and in nontumor tissues, demonstrating that de novo methyltransferases can initiate methylation and silencing of specific genes in phenotypically normal cells. This suggests that DNA methylation patterns in cancer are the result of specific targeting of at least some tumor suppressor genes rather than of random, stochastic methylation followed by clonal selection due to a proliferative advantage caused by tumor suppressor gene silencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz G. Linhart
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Haijiang Lin
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Yasuhiro Yamada
- Department for Tumor Pathology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
| | - Eva Moran
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Eveline J. Steine
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Sumita Gokhale
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Grace Lo
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Erika Cantu
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | | | - Timothy He
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Alex Meissner
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Rudolf Jaenisch
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Paoloni-Giacobino A, D’Aiuto L, Cirio MC, Reinhart B, Chaillet JR. Conserved features of imprinted differentially methylated domains. Gene 2007; 399:33-45. [PMID: 17544602 PMCID: PMC2729497 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2007] [Revised: 04/17/2007] [Accepted: 04/23/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is a conserved epigenetic phenomenon in eutherian mammals, with regards both to the genes that are imprinted and the mechanism underlying the expression of just one of the parental alleles. Epigenetic modifications of alleles of imprinted genes are established during oogenesis and spermatogenesis, and these modifications are then inherited. Differentially methylated domains (DMDs) of imprinted genes are the genomic sites of these inherited epigenetic imprints. We previously showed that CpG-rich imperfect tandem direct repeats within three different mouse DMDs (Snurf/Snrpn, Kcnq1 and Igf2r), each with a unique sequence, play a central role in maintaining the differential methylation. This finding implicates repeat-related DNA structure, not sequence, in the imprinting mechanism. To better define the important features of this signal, we compared sequences of these three DMD tandem repeats among mammalian species. All DMD repeats contain short indirect repeats, many of which are organized into larger unit repeats. Even though the larger repeat units undergo deletion and addition during evolution (most likely through unequal crossovers during meiosis), the size of DMD tandem repeated regions has remained remarkably stable during mammalian evolution. Moreover, all three DMD tandem repeats have a high-CpG content, an ordered arrangement of CpG dinucleotides, and similar predicted secondary structures. These observations suggest that a structural feature or features of these DMD tandem repeats is the conserved DMD imprinting signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - J. Richard Chaillet
- Address for correspondence: Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA, Tel: (001) 412 383 7974, fax: (001) 412 383 7984, Email address:
| |
Collapse
|