The enzyme that adds poly(A) to mRNAs is a classical poly(A) polymerase

3'-end mRNA processing within apicomplexan parasites, a patchwork of classic, and unexpected players

The 3'-end processing of mRNA is a co-transcriptional process that leads to the formation of a poly-adenosine tail on the mRNA and directly controls termination of the RNA polymerase II juggernaut. This process involves a megadalton complex composed of cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factors (CPSFs) that are able to recognize cis-sequence elements on nascent mRNA to then carry out cleavage and polyadenylation reactions. Recent structural and biochemical studies have defined the roles played by different subunits of the complex and provided a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of this machinery in yeast or metazoans. More recently, the discovery of small molecule inhibitors of CPSF function in Apicomplexa has stimulated interest in studying the specificities of this ancient eukaryotic machinery in these organisms. Although its function is conserved in Apicomplexa, the CPSF complex integrates a novel reader of the N6-methyladenosine (m6A). This feature, inherited from the plant kingdom, bridges m6A metabolism directly to 3'-end processing and by extension, to transcription termination. In this review, we will examine convergence and divergence of CPSF within the apicomplexan parasites and explore the potential of small molecule inhibition of this machinery within these organisms. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > 3' End Processing RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification.

Transgenesis of mammalian PABP reveals mRNA polyadenylation as a general stress response mechanism in bacteria

In eukaryotes, mRNA 3′-polyadenylation triggers poly(A) binding protein (PABP) recruitment and stabilization. In a stark contrast, polyadenylation marks mRNAs for degradation in bacteria. To study this difference, we trans-express the mammalian nuclear PABPN1 chromosomally and extra-chromosomally in Escherichia coli. Expression of PABPN1 but not the mutant PABPN1 stabilizes polyadenylated mRNAs and improves their half-lives. In the presence of PABPN1, 3′-exonuclease PNPase is not detected on PA-tailed mRNAs compromising the degradation. We show that PABPN1 trans-expression phenocopies pcnB (that encodes poly(A) polymerase, PAPI) mutation and regulates plasmid copy number. Genome-wide RNA-seq analysis shows a general up-regulation of polyadenylated mRNAs on PABPN1 expression, the largest subset of which are those involved in general stress response. However, major global stress regulators are unaffected on PABPN1 expression. Concomitantly, PABPN1 expression or pcnB mutation imparts cellular tolerance to multiple stresses. This study establishes mRNA 3′-polyadenylation as a general stress response mechanism in E. coli.

•

Trans expression of mammalian PABPN1 stabilizes polyadenyated mRNAs in E. coli

•

PABPN1 expression phenocopies pcnB mutation and regulates plasmid copy number

•

3′-polyadenylation acts as a general stress response mechanism in bacteria

•

This study indicates an evolutionary significance of PABP in mRNA metabolism

Structures of mammalian GLD-2 proteins reveal molecular basis of their functional diversity in mRNA and microRNA processing

The stability and processing of cellular RNA transcripts are efficiently controlled via non-templated addition of single or multiple nucleotides, which is catalyzed by various nucleotidyltransferases including poly(A) polymerases (PAPs). Germline development defective 2 (GLD-2) is among the first reported cytoplasmic non-canonical PAPs that promotes the translation of germline-specific mRNAs by extending their short poly(A) tails in metazoan, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Xenopus. On the other hand, the function of mammalian GLD-2 seems more diverse, which includes monoadenylation of certain microRNAs. To understand the structural basis that underlies the difference between mammalian and non-mammalian GLD-2 proteins, we determine crystal structures of two rodent GLD-2s. Different from C. elegans GLD-2, mammalian GLD-2 is an intrinsically robust PAP with an extensively positively charged surface. Rodent and C. elegans GLD-2s have a topological difference in the β-sheet region of the central domain. Whereas C. elegans GLD-2 prefers adenosine-rich RNA substrates, mammalian GLD-2 can work on RNA oligos with various sequences. Coincident with its activity on microRNAs, mammalian GLD-2 structurally resembles the mRNA and miRNA processor terminal uridylyltransferase 7 (TUT7). Our study reveals how GLD-2 structurally evolves to a more versatile nucleotidyltransferase, and provides important clues in understanding its biological function in mammals.

RNA Binding Proteins and Regulation of mRNA Translation in Erythropoiesis

Control of gene expression in erythropoiesis has to respond to signals that may emerge from intracellular processes or environmental factors. Control of mRNA translation allows for relatively rapid modulation of protein synthesis from the existing transcriptome. For instance, the protein synthesis rate needs to be reduced when reactive oxygen species or unfolded proteins accumulate in the cells, but also when iron supply is low or when growth factors are lacking in the environment. In addition, regulation of mRNA translation can be important as an additional layer of control on top of gene transcription, in which RNA binding proteins (RBPs) can modify translation of a set of transcripts to the cell’s actual protein requirement. The 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions of mRNA (5′UTR, 3′UTR) contain binding sites for general and sequence specific translation factors. They also contain secondary structures that may hamper scanning of the 5′UTR by translation complexes or may help to recruit translation factors. In addition, the term 5′UTR is not fully correct because many transcripts contain small open reading frames in their 5′UTR that are translated and contribute to regulation of mRNA translation. It is becoming increasingly clear that the transcriptome only partly predicts the proteome. The aim of this review is (i) to summarize how the availability of general translation initiation factors can selectively regulate transcripts because the 5′UTR contains secondary structures or short translated sequences, (ii) to discuss mechanisms that control the length of the mRNA poly(A) tail in relation to mRNA translation, and (iii) to give examples of sequence specific RBPs and their targets. We focused on transcripts and RBPs required for erythropoiesis. Whereas differentiation of erythroblasts to erythrocytes is orchestrated by erythroid transcription factors, the production of erythrocytes needs to respond to the availability of growth factors and nutrients, particularly the availability of iron.

Specificity factors in cytoplasmic polyadenylation

Poly(A) tail elongation after export of an messenger RNA (mRNA) to the cytoplasm is called cytoplasmic polyadenylation. It was first discovered in oocytes and embryos, where it has roles in meiosis and development. In recent years, however, has been implicated in many other processes, including synaptic plasticity and mitosis. This review aims to introduce cytoplasmic polyadenylation with an emphasis on the factors and elements mediating this process for different mRNAs and in different animal species. We will discuss the RNA sequence elements mediating cytoplasmic polyadenylation in the 3' untranslated regions of mRNAs, including the CPE, MBE, TCS, eCPE, and C-CPE. In addition to describing the role of general polyadenylation factors, we discuss the specific RNA binding protein families associated with cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements, including CPEB (CPEB1, CPEB2, CPEB3, and CPEB4), Pumilio (PUM2), Musashi (MSI1, MSI2), zygote arrest (ZAR2), ELAV like proteins (ELAVL1, HuR), poly(C) binding proteins (PCBP2, αCP2, hnRNP-E2), and Bicaudal C (BICC1). Some emerging themes in cytoplasmic polyadenylation will be highlighted. To facilitate understanding for those working in different organisms and fields, particularly those who are analyzing high throughput data, HUGO gene nomenclature for the human orthologs is used throughout. Where human orthologs have not been clearly identified, reference is made to protein families identified in man.

Juxtaposition of two distant, serine-arginine-rich protein-binding elements is required for optimal polyadenylation in Rous sarcoma virus

The Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) polyadenylation site (PAS) is very poorly used in vitro due to suboptimal upstream and downstream elements, and yet ∼85% of viral transcripts are polyadenylated in vivo. The mechanisms that orchestrate polyadenylation at the weak PAS are not completely understood. It was previously shown that serine-arginine (SR)-rich proteins stimulate RSV PAS use in vitro and in vivo. It has been proposed that viral RNA polyadenylation is stimulated through a nonproductive splice complex that forms between a pseudo 5' splice site (5'ss) within the negative regulator of splicing (NRS) and a downstream 3'ss, which repositions NRS-bound SR proteins closer to the viral PAS. This repositioning is thought to be important for long-distance poly(A) stimulation by the NRS. We report here that a 308-nucleotide deletion downstream of the env 3'ss decreased polyadenylation efficiency, suggesting the presence of an additional element required for optimal RSV polyadenylation. Mapping studies localized the poly(A) stimulating element to a region coincident with the Env splicing enhancer, which binds SR proteins, and inactivation of the enhancer and SR protein binding decreased polyadenylation efficiency. The positive effect of the Env enhancer on polyadenylation could be uncoupled from its role in splicing. As with the NRS, the Env enhancer also stimulated use of the viral PAS in vitro. These results suggest that a critical threshold of SR proteins, achieved by juxtaposition of SR protein binding sites within the NRS and Env enhancer, is required for long-range polyadenylation stimulation.

Heterogeneity in mammalian RNA 3' end formation

Precisely directed cleavage and polyadenylation of mRNA is a fundamental part of eukaryotic gene expression. Yet, 3' end heterogeneity has been documented for thousands of mammalian genes, and usage of one cleavage and polyadenylation signal over another has been shown to impact gene expression in many cases. Building upon the rich biochemical and genetic understanding of the 3' end formation, recent genomic studies have begun to suggest that widespread changes in mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation may be a part of large, dynamic gene regulatory programs. In this review, we begin with a modest overview of the studies that defined the mechanisms of mammalian 3' end formation, and then discuss how recent genomic studies intersect with these more traditional approaches, showing that both will be crucial for expanding our understanding of this facet of gene regulation.

Mammalian GLD-2 homologs are poly(A) polymerases

GLD-2 is a cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase present in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line and embryo. It is a divergent member of the DNA polymerase beta nucleotidyl transferase superfamily, which includes CCA-adding enzymes, DNA polymerases and eukaryotic nuclear poly(A) polymerases. The polyadenylation activity of GLD-2 is stimulated by physical interaction with an RNA binding protein, GLD-3. To test whether GLD-3 might stimulate GLD-2 by recruiting it to RNA, we tethered C. elegans GLD-2 to mRNAs in Xenopus oocytes by using MS2 coat protein. Tethered GLD-2 adds poly(A) and stimulates translation of the mRNA, demonstrating that recruitment is sufficient to stimulate polyadenylation activity. We use the same tethered assay to identify human and mouse poly(A) polymerases related to GLD-2. This may provide entrees to previously uncharacterized modes of polyadenylation in mammalian cells.

Poly(A) polymerase contains multiple functional domains

Poly(A) polymerase (PAP) contains regions of similarity with several known protein domains. Through site-directed mutagenesis, we provide evidence that PAP contains a functional ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain (RBD) that is responsible for primer binding, making it the only known polymerase to contain such a domain. The RBD is adjacent to, and probably overlaps with, an apparent catalytic region responsible for polymerization. Despite the presence of sequence similarities, this catalytic domain appears to be distinct from the conserved polymerase module found in a large number of RNA-dependent polymerases. PAP contains two nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in its C terminus, each by itself similar to the consensus bipartite NLS found in many nuclear proteins. Mutagenesis experiments indicate that both signals, which are separated by nearly 140 residues, play important roles in directing PAP exclusively to the nucleus. Surprisingly, basic amino acids in the N-terminal-most NLS are also essential for AAUAAA-dependent polyadenylation but not for nonspecific poly(A) synthesis, suggesting that this region of PAP is involved in interactions both with nuclear targeting proteins and with nuclear polyadenylation factors. The serine/threonine-rich C terminus is multiply phosphorylated, including at sites affected by mutations in either NLS.

Poly(A) polymerase contains multiple functional domains

Poly(A) polymerase (PAP) contains regions of similarity with several known protein domains. Through site-directed mutagenesis, we provide evidence that PAP contains a functional ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain (RBD) that is responsible for primer binding, making it the only known polymerase to contain such a domain. The RBD is adjacent to, and probably overlaps with, an apparent catalytic region responsible for polymerization. Despite the presence of sequence similarities, this catalytic domain appears to be distinct from the conserved polymerase module found in a large number of RNA-dependent polymerases. PAP contains two nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in its C terminus, each by itself similar to the consensus bipartite NLS found in many nuclear proteins. Mutagenesis experiments indicate that both signals, which are separated by nearly 140 residues, play important roles in directing PAP exclusively to the nucleus. Surprisingly, basic amino acids in the N-terminal-most NLS are also essential for AAUAAA-dependent polyadenylation but not for nonspecific poly(A) synthesis, suggesting that this region of PAP is involved in interactions both with nuclear targeting proteins and with nuclear polyadenylation factors. The serine/threonine-rich C terminus is multiply phosphorylated, including at sites affected by mutations in either NLS.

Transcription termination and polyadenylation in retroviruses

The provirus structure of retroviruses is bracketed by long terminal repeats (LTRs). The two LTRs (5' and 3') are identical in nucleotide sequence and organization. They contain signals for transcription initiation as well as termination and cleavage polyadenylation. As in eukaryotic pre-mRNAs, the two common signals, the polyadenylation signal, AAUAAA, or a variant AGUAAA, and the G+U-rich sequence are present in all retroviruses. However, the AAUAAA sequence is present in the U3 region in some retroviruses and in the R region in other retroviruses. As in animal cell RNAs, both AAUAAA and G+U-rich sequences apparently contribute to the 3'-end processing of retroviral RNAs. In addition, at least in a few cases examined, the sequences in the U3 region determine the efficiency of 3'-end processing. In retroviruses in which the AAUAAA is localized in the R region, the poly(A) signal in the 3' LTR but not the 5' LTR must be selectively used for the production of genomic RNA. It appears that the short distance between the 5' cap site and polyadenylation signal in the 5' LTR precludes premature termination and polyadenylation. Since 5' and 3' LTRs are identical in sequence and structural organization yet function differently, it is speculated that flanking cellular DNA sequences, chromatin structure, and binding of transcription factors may be involved in the functional divergence of 5' and 3' LTRs of retroviruses.

The human 64-kDa polyadenylylation factor contains a ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain and unusual auxiliary motifs

Cleavage stimulation factor is one of the multiple factors required for 3'-end cleavage of mammalian pre-mRNAs. We have shown previously that this factor is composed of three subunits with estimated molecular masses of 77, 64, and 50 kDa and that the 64-kDa subunit can be UV-crosslinked to RNA in a polyadenylylation signal (AAUAAA)-dependent manner. We have now isolated cDNAs encoding the 64-kDa subunit of human cleavage stimulation factor. The 64-kDa subunit contains a ribonucleoprotein-type RNA binding domain in the N-terminal region and a repeat structure in the C-terminal region in which a pentapeptide sequence (consensus MEARA/G) is repeated 12 times and the formation of a long alpha-helix stabilized by salt bridges is predicted. An approximately 270-amino acid segment surrounding this repeat structure is highly enriched in proline and glycine residues (approximately 20% for each). When cloned 64-kDa subunit was expressed in Escherichia coli, an N-terminal fragment containing the RNA binding domain bound to RNAs in a polyadenylylation-signal-independent manner, suggesting that the RNA binding domain is directly involved in the binding of the 64-kDa subunit to pre-mRNAs.

Potential role of poly(A) polymerase in the assembly of polyadenylation-specific RNP complexes

To elucidate the mechanism by which poly(A) polymerase functions in the 3'-end processing of pre-mRNAs, polyadenylation-specific RNP complexes were isolated by sedimentation in sucrose density gradients and the fractions were analyzed for the presence of the enzyme. At early stages of the reaction, the RNP complexes were resolved into distinct peaks which sedimented at approximately 18S and 25S. When reactions were carried out under conditions which support cleavage or polyadenylation, the pre-mRNA was specifically assembled into the larger 25S RNP complexes. Polyclonal antibodies raised against the enzyme purified from a rat hepatoma, which have been shown to inhibit cleavage and polyadenylation (Terns, M., and Jacob, S. T., Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:1435-1444, 1989) also prevented assembly of the 25S polyadenylation-specific RNP complexes. Furthermore, formation of these complexes required the presence of a chromatographic fraction containing poly(A) polymerase. UV cross-linking analysis indicated that the purified enzyme could be readily cross-linked to pre-mRNA but in an apparent sequence-independent manner. Reconstitution studies with the fractionated components showed that formation of the 25S RNP complex required the poly(A) polymerase fraction. Although the enzyme has not been directly localized to the specific complexes, the data presented in this report supports the role of poly(A) polymerase as an essential component of polyadenylation-specific complexes which functions both as a structural and enzymatic constituent.

Polyadenylation of mRNA: minimal substrates and a requirement for the 2' hydroxyl of the U in AAUAAA

mRNA-specific polyadenylation can be assayed in vitro by using synthetic RNAs that end at or near the natural cleavage site. This reaction requires the highly conserved sequence AAUAAA. At least two distinct nuclear components, an AAUAAA specificity factor and poly(A) polymerase, are required to catalyze the reaction. In this study, we identified structural features of the RNA substrate that are critical for mRNA-specific polyadenylation. We found that a substrate that contained only 11 nucleotides, of which the first six were AAUAAA, underwent AAUAAA-specific polyadenylation. This is the shortest substrate we have used that supports polyadenylation: removal of a single nucleotide from either end of this RNA abolished the reaction. Although AAUAAA appeared to be the only strict sequence requirement for polyadenylation, the number of nucleotides between AAUAAA and the 3' end was critical. Substrates with seven or fewer nucleotides beyond AAUAAA received poly(A) with decreased efficiency yet still bound efficiently to specificity factor. We infer that on these shortened substrates, poly(A) polymerase cannot simultaneously contact the specificity factor bound to AAUAAA and the 3' end of the RNA. By incorporating 2'-deoxyuridine into the U of AAUAAA, we demonstrated that the 2' hydroxyl of the U in AAUAAA was required for the binding of specificity factor to the substrate and hence for poly(A) addition. This finding may indicate that at least one of the factors involved in the interaction with AAUAAA is a protein.

Polyadenylation of mRNA: minimal substrates and a requirement for the 2' hydroxyl of the U in AAUAAA

mRNA-specific polyadenylation can be assayed in vitro by using synthetic RNAs that end at or near the natural cleavage site. This reaction requires the highly conserved sequence AAUAAA. At least two distinct nuclear components, an AAUAAA specificity factor and poly(A) polymerase, are required to catalyze the reaction. In this study, we identified structural features of the RNA substrate that are critical for mRNA-specific polyadenylation. We found that a substrate that contained only 11 nucleotides, of which the first six were AAUAAA, underwent AAUAAA-specific polyadenylation. This is the shortest substrate we have used that supports polyadenylation: removal of a single nucleotide from either end of this RNA abolished the reaction. Although AAUAAA appeared to be the only strict sequence requirement for polyadenylation, the number of nucleotides between AAUAAA and the 3' end was critical. Substrates with seven or fewer nucleotides beyond AAUAAA received poly(A) with decreased efficiency yet still bound efficiently to specificity factor. We infer that on these shortened substrates, poly(A) polymerase cannot simultaneously contact the specificity factor bound to AAUAAA and the 3' end of the RNA. By incorporating 2'-deoxyuridine into the U of AAUAAA, we demonstrated that the 2' hydroxyl of the U in AAUAAA was required for the binding of specificity factor to the substrate and hence for poly(A) addition. This finding may indicate that at least one of the factors involved in the interaction with AAUAAA is a protein.