The mouse ribosomal DNA promoter has more stringent requirements in vivo than in vitro

Characterization of a fission yeast subunit of an RNA polymerase I essential transcription initiation factor, SpRrn7h/TAF(I)68, that bridges yeast and mammals: association with SpRrn11h and the core ribosomal RNA gene promoter

Production of eukaryotic ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) entails sequence-specific recognition of regulatory sequences in the rRNA gene promoter. A putative subunit of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe essential transcription initiation factor for rRNA synthesis has been identified that shares homology with both murine TAF(I)68 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrn7p, subunits of their species' transcription initiation factor. Affinity purified putative SpRrn7h and associated factors, including a putative Rrn11p homolog, SpRrn11h, bear RNA polymerase I transcription initiation factor activity, and recombinant SpRrn7h associates with S. pombe core rDNA promoter sequences. In the first widespread search for putative homologs of SpRrn7h/murine TAF(I)68, and SpRrn11h/murine TAF(I)48, multiple ones were identified across eukaryotes. Analysis of residues conserved between the fission yeast and murine essential initiation factor subunits aided in these identifications. Sequences in the core rRNA gene promoter contributing to transcriptional activation were investigated, including a perfect TATAAA element located at -35.

Common DNA structural features exhibited by eukaryotic ribosomal gene promoters

Nucleotide sequences of DNA regions containing eukaryotic ribosomal promoters were analysed using strategies designed to reveal sequence-directed structural features. DNA curvature, duplex stability and pattern of twist angle variation were studied by computer modelling. Although ribosomal promoters are known to lack sequence homology (unless very closely related species are considered), investigation of these structural characteristics uncovered striking homologies in all the taxonomic groups examined so far. This wide conservation of DNA structures, while DNA sequence is not conserved, suggests that the determined structures are fundamental for ribosomal promoter function. Moreover, this result agrees well with the recent observations showing that RNA polymerase I transcription factors have not evolved as intensively as previously suspected.

Transcription from the rat 45S ribosomal DNA promoter does not require the factor UBF

For efficient transcription from the rat ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter by RNA polymerase I in vitro, at least two transcription factors, rat UBF and rat SL-1, are required. Transcription cannot take place in vitro in the absence of SL-1. On the other hand, there is considerable difference of opinion concerning the necessity for UBF in in vitro transcription mediated by RNA polymerase 1, and the requirement for UBF is not clear. Mammalian cells code for UBF1 and UBF2, two forms of UBF that differ in HMG box-2, one of four HMG boxes or DNA-binding domains. We have used a monospecific antibody raised to recombinant rat UBF to determine whether UBF1 and UBF2 are required for RNA polymerase I-mediated transcription. This antibody can detect as little as 1.35 x 10(-15) moles of UBF1 or UBF2 in an immunoblot. Fractionated extracts that were competent for transcription had no detectable UBF1 or UBF2 when assayed in immunoblots with this antiserum. This evidence supports the hypothesis that UBF is not required for transcription of the rat rDNA promoter in vitro and most likely functions as an auxillary transcription factor. In addition, we have fractionated rat UBF1 from UBF2 and tested each of them in in vitro transcription assays in which the 45S or spacer rDNA promoter template is limiting. UBF1 can activate transcription from either the 45S or spacer promoter under these conditions, whereas UBF2 cannot. This implies that there is a functional difference in the transactivation of RNA polymerase I by UBF1 and UBF2 in vitro.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)