A new serum-responsive, cardiac tissue-specific transcription factor that recognizes the MEF-2 site in the myosin light chain-2 promoter

Repression of the cardiac myosin light chain-2 gene in skeletal muscle requires site-specific association of antithetic regulator, Nished, and HDACs

The transcriptional activation mechanisms that regulate tissue-specific expression of cardiac muscle genes have been extensively investigated, but little is known of the regulatory events involved in repression of cardiac-specific genes in non-cardiac cells. We have previously reported that Nished, a ubiquitous transcription factor, interacts with a positive sequence element, the Intron Regulatory Element (IRE) as well as a negatively acting element, the Cardiac-Specific Sequence (CSS), in myosin light chain-2 (MLC2v) gene to promote activation and repression of the gene in cardiac and skeletal muscle cells respectively. Here, we show that the negative regulation of cardiac MLC2v gene in skeletal muscle cells is mediated via the interaction of Nished with histone deacetylase (HDAC) co-repressor. Treatment of cells with the HDAC inhibitor, Trichostatin A (TSA), alleviates the repressor activity of Nished in a dose-dependent manner. Co-transfection studies in primary muscle cells in culture and in Nished expressing stable skeletal muscle cell line demonstrate that Nished down-regulates the cardiac MLC2 gene expression when its association is restricted to CSS alone. Chromatin immunoprecipitation data suggest that the CSS-mediated repression of cardiac MLC2v gene in skeletal muscle cells excludes the participation of the positive element IRE despite the presence of an identical Nished binding site. Taken together, it appears that the negative control of MLC2v transcription is based on a dual mode of regulations, one that affords inaccessibility of IRE to Nished and second that promotes the formation of the transcription repression complex at the inhibitory CSS site to silence the cardiac gene in skeletal muscle cell.

Modulation of MLC-2v gene expression by AP-1: complex regulatory role of Jun in cardiac myocytes

Hypertrophic stimulation of cardiac myocytes results in rapid induction of a number of transcription factors, including members of the AP-1 family, which is followed by a programmed alteration in the pattern of gene expression. In the ventricular cardiocytes there is re-expression of the fetal atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) gene and upregulation of its myosin light chain-2 (MLC-2v). The mechanism(s) by which the induction ofAP-1 is coupled to the promoters of these target genes is largely unknown. In this report, we demonstrate that in transient co-transfection assay, c-Jun inhibited while Jun B stimulated the MLC-2v promoter activity. Mutant c-Jun recombinants, in which the activation domains were deleted, still remained inhibitory, but a specific mutation in the leucine zipper, which changes the alignment of Jun with its dimerization partner, caused a reversal of its effect on the target MLC-2v promoter. Based on these findings, we propose that in chicken cardiac myocytes, the regulation of MLC-2v promoter by Jun may occur via its interaction with other proteins, possibly of the leucine zipper family.

A muscle-specific enhancer within intron 1 of the human dystrophin gene is functionally dependent on single MEF-1/E box and MEF-2/AT-rich sequence motifs

In previous studies we have described a 5.0 kb Hin dIII fragment downstream of muscle exon 1 that exhibits properties consistent with a muscle-specific transcriptional enhancer. The goal of this study has been to identify the sequence elements responsible for muscle-specific enhancer activity. Functional studies indicated that this enhancer is active in pre- and post-differentiated H9C2(2-1) myoblasts but functions poorly in L6 and C2C12 myotubes. The core enhancer region was delimited to a 195 bp Spe I- Acc I fragment and sequence analysis identified three MEF-1/E box and two MEF-2/AT-rich motifs as potential muscle-specific regulatory domains. EMSA competition and DNase footprinting indicated that sequences within a 30 bp region containing single adjoining MEF-1/E box and MEF-2/AT-rich motifs are target binding sites for trans -acting factors expressed in H9C2(2-1) myotubes but not in L6 or C2C12 myotubes. Site-specific mutations within these motifs resulted in a significant reduction in enhancer activity in H9C2(2-1) myotubes. These results suggest that the mechanisms governing DMD gene expression in muscle are similar to those identified in other muscle-specific genes. However, the myogenic profile of enhancer activity and trans -acting factor binding suggests a more specialized role for this enhancer that is consistent with its potential involvement in dystrophin gene regulation in cardiac muscle.

Transcription of the human beta enolase gene (ENO-3) is regulated by an intronic muscle-specific enhancer that binds myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2 proteins and ubiquitous G-rich-box binding factors

To provide evidence for the cis-regulatory DNA sequences and trans-acting factors involved in the complex pattern of tissue- and stage-specific expression of the beta enolase gene, constructs containing fragments of the gene fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene were used in transient-transfection assays of C2C12 myogenic cells. Deletion analysis revealed the presence of four major regions: two negative regions in the 5'-flanking sequence, a basal promoter region which directs expression at low levels in proliferating and differentiated muscle cells, and a positive region within the first intron that confers cell-type-specific and differentiation-induced expression. This positive regulatory element is located in the 3'-proximal portion of the first intron (nucleotides +504 to +637) and acts as an enhancer irrespective of orientation and position from the homologous beta enolase promoter or the heterologous thymidine kinase promoter, conferring in both cases muscle-specific expression to the linked reporter gene. Deletion of a putative myocyte-specific enhancer factor 1 (MEF-1) binding site, containing a canonical E-box motif, had no effects on muscle-specific transcription, indicating that this site is not required for the activity of the enhancer. Gel mobility shift assays, competition analysis, DNase I footprinting, and mutagenesis studies indicated that this element interacts through an A/T-rich box with a MEF-2 protein(s) and through a G-rich box with a novel ubiquitous factor(s). Mutation of either the G-rich box or the A/T-rich box resulted in a significantly reduced activity of the enhancer in transient-transfection assays. These data indicate that MEF-2 and G-rich-box binding factors are each necessary for tissue-specific expression of the beta enolase gene in skeletal muscle cells.

Serum induction of MEF2/RSRF expression in vascular myocytes is mediated at the level of translation

Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) reversibly coordinate the expression of VSMC-specific genes and the genes required for cell cycle progression. Here we demonstrate that isoforms of the MEF2/RSRF transcription factor are expressed in VSMCs and in vascular tissue. The MEF2A DNA-binding activity was upregulated when quiescent VSMCs were stimulated to proliferate with serum mitogens. The serum-induction of MEF2A DNA-binding activity occurred approximately 4 h following serum activation, and this correlated with an increase in the level of MEF2A protein without changes in the level of MEF2A mRNA or protein stability. These results indicate that MEF2A induction by serum is regulated at the level of translation.

Differential expression of the myocyte enhancer factor 2 family of transcription factors in development: the cardiac factor BBF-1 is an early marker for cardiogenesis

In the present study, we have used single chicken blastoderms of defined early developmental stages, beginning with the prestreak stage, stage 1 (V. Hamburger and H. L. Hamilton, J. Morphol. 88:49-92, 1951), to analyze the onset of cardiac myogenesis by monitoring the appearance of selected cardiac muscle tissue-specific gene transcripts and the functional expression of the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF-2) proteins. Using gene-specific oligonucleotide primers in reverse transcriptase PCR assay, we have demonstrated that the cardiac myosin light-chain 2 (MLC2) and alpha-actin gene transcripts appear as early as stage 5, i.e., immediately after the cardiogenic fate assignment at stage 4. Consistent with this observation is the developmental expression pattern of DNA-binding activity of BBF-1, a cardiac muscle-specific member of the MEF-2 protein family, which also begins at stage 5 prior to MEF-2. Differential expression of DNA-binding complexes is also observed with another AT-rich DNA sequence (CArG box) as probe, but the binding pattern with the ubiquitous TATA-binding proteins remains unchanged during the same developmental period. Thus, the cardiogenic commitment and differentiation of the precardiac mesoderm, as exemplified by the appearance of cardiac MEF-2, MLC2, and alpha-actin gene products, occur earlier than previously thought and appear to be closely linked. The onset of skeletal myogenic program follows that of the cardiogenic program with the appearance of skeletal MLC2 at stage 8. We also observed that mRNA for the MEF-2 family of proteins appears as early as stage 2 and that for CMD-1, the chicken counterpart of MyoD, appears at stage 5. The temporal separation of activation of cardiac and skeletal MLC2 genes, which appears immediately after the respective fate assignments, and those of cardiac MEF-2 and CMD-1, which occur before, are consistent with the established appearance of the myogenic programs and with the acquisition pattern of the two tissue-specific morphological characteristics in the early embryo. The preferential appearance of BBF-1 activity in precardiac moesderm, relative to that of MEF-2, indicates that these two protein factors are distinct members of the MEF-2 family and provides a compelling argument in support of the potential role of BBF-1 as a regulator of the cardiogenic cell lineage determination, while cardiac MEF-2 might be involved in maintenance of the cardiac differentiative state.

Differential expression of the myocyte enhancer factor 2 family of transcription factors in development: the cardiac factor BBF-1 is an early marker for cardiogenesis

In the present study, we have used single chicken blastoderms of defined early developmental stages, beginning with the prestreak stage, stage 1 (V. Hamburger and H. L. Hamilton, J. Morphol. 88:49-92, 1951), to analyze the onset of cardiac myogenesis by monitoring the appearance of selected cardiac muscle tissue-specific gene transcripts and the functional expression of the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF-2) proteins. Using gene-specific oligonucleotide primers in reverse transcriptase PCR assay, we have demonstrated that the cardiac myosin light-chain 2 (MLC2) and alpha-actin gene transcripts appear as early as stage 5, i.e., immediately after the cardiogenic fate assignment at stage 4. Consistent with this observation is the developmental expression pattern of DNA-binding activity of BBF-1, a cardiac muscle-specific member of the MEF-2 protein family, which also begins at stage 5 prior to MEF-2. Differential expression of DNA-binding complexes is also observed with another AT-rich DNA sequence (CArG box) as probe, but the binding pattern with the ubiquitous TATA-binding proteins remains unchanged during the same developmental period. Thus, the cardiogenic commitment and differentiation of the precardiac mesoderm, as exemplified by the appearance of cardiac MEF-2, MLC2, and alpha-actin gene products, occur earlier than previously thought and appear to be closely linked. The onset of skeletal myogenic program follows that of the cardiogenic program with the appearance of skeletal MLC2 at stage 8. We also observed that mRNA for the MEF-2 family of proteins appears as early as stage 2 and that for CMD-1, the chicken counterpart of MyoD, appears at stage 5. The temporal separation of activation of cardiac and skeletal MLC2 genes, which appears immediately after the respective fate assignments, and those of cardiac MEF-2 and CMD-1, which occur before, are consistent with the established appearance of the myogenic programs and with the acquisition pattern of the two tissue-specific morphological characteristics in the early embryo. The preferential appearance of BBF-1 activity in precardiac moesderm, relative to that of MEF-2, indicates that these two protein factors are distinct members of the MEF-2 family and provides a compelling argument in support of the potential role of BBF-1 as a regulator of the cardiogenic cell lineage determination, while cardiac MEF-2 might be involved in maintenance of the cardiac differentiative state.

A Mef2 gene that generates a muscle-specific isoform via alternative mRNA splicing

Members of the myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor 2 (MEF2) family of transcription factors bind a conserved A/T-rich sequence in the control regions of numerous muscle-specific genes. Mammalian MEF2 proteins have been shown previously to be encoded by three genes, Mef2, xMef2, and Mef2c, each of which gives rise to multiple alternatively spliced transcripts. We describe the cloning of a new member of the MEF2 family from mice, termed MEF2D, which shares extensive homology with other MEF2 proteins but is the product of a separate gene. MEF2D binds to and activates transcription through the MEF2 site and forms heterodimers with other members of the MEF2 family. Deletion mutations show that the carboxyl terminus of MEF2D is required for efficient transactivation. MEF2D transcripts are widely expressed, but alternative splicing of MEF2D transcripts gives rise to a muscle-specific isoform which is induced during myoblast differentiation. The mouse Mef2, Mef2c, and Mef2d genes map to chromosomes 7, 13, and 3, respectively. The complexity of the MEF2 family of regulatory proteins provides the potential for fine-tuning of transcriptional responses as a consequence of combinatorial interactions among multiple MEF2 isoforms encoded by the four Mef2 genes.

A Mef2 gene that generates a muscle-specific isoform via alternative mRNA splicing

Members of the myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor 2 (MEF2) family of transcription factors bind a conserved A/T-rich sequence in the control regions of numerous muscle-specific genes. Mammalian MEF2 proteins have been shown previously to be encoded by three genes, Mef2, xMef2, and Mef2c, each of which gives rise to multiple alternatively spliced transcripts. We describe the cloning of a new member of the MEF2 family from mice, termed MEF2D, which shares extensive homology with other MEF2 proteins but is the product of a separate gene. MEF2D binds to and activates transcription through the MEF2 site and forms heterodimers with other members of the MEF2 family. Deletion mutations show that the carboxyl terminus of MEF2D is required for efficient transactivation. MEF2D transcripts are widely expressed, but alternative splicing of MEF2D transcripts gives rise to a muscle-specific isoform which is induced during myoblast differentiation. The mouse Mef2, Mef2c, and Mef2d genes map to chromosomes 7, 13, and 3, respectively. The complexity of the MEF2 family of regulatory proteins provides the potential for fine-tuning of transcriptional responses as a consequence of combinatorial interactions among multiple MEF2 isoforms encoded by the four Mef2 genes.

The MEF-3 motif is required for MEF-2-mediated skeletal muscle-specific induction of the rat aldolase A gene

The rat aldolase A gene contains two alternative promoters and two alternative first exons. The distal promoter M is expressed at a high level only in skeletal muscle. Previous in vitro transfection studies identified the region from -202 to -85 as an enhancer that is responsible for dramatic activation during the differentiation of chicken primary myoblasts. This enhancer contains an A/T-rich sequence resembling the MEF-2 motif, which is an important element of muscle enhancers and promoters. In this study, we demonstrate that the MEF-2 sequence is essential but not sufficient for the activity of the enhancer. Another region required for the activity was recognized by a nuclear factor, tentatively named MAF1. MAF1 was found in both muscle cells and nonmuscle cells, and MAF1 from both cell types was indistinguishable by gel retardation and DNase I footprint experiments. The sequence required for MAF1 binding is very similar to the MEF-3 motif, which is an element of the skeletal muscle-specific enhancer of the cardiac troponin C gene. Because MAF1 and MEF-3 are closely related in both recognition sequence and distribution, MAF1 and MEF-3 probably represent the same nuclear factor which may play an important role in muscle gene transcription. Thus, the muscle-specific induction of the aldolase A gene is governed by muscle-specific MEF-2 and existing MEF-3 (MAF1).

The MEF-3 motif is required for MEF-2-mediated skeletal muscle-specific induction of the rat aldolase A gene

The rat aldolase A gene contains two alternative promoters and two alternative first exons. The distal promoter M is expressed at a high level only in skeletal muscle. Previous in vitro transfection studies identified the region from -202 to -85 as an enhancer that is responsible for dramatic activation during the differentiation of chicken primary myoblasts. This enhancer contains an A/T-rich sequence resembling the MEF-2 motif, which is an important element of muscle enhancers and promoters. In this study, we demonstrate that the MEF-2 sequence is essential but not sufficient for the activity of the enhancer. Another region required for the activity was recognized by a nuclear factor, tentatively named MAF1. MAF1 was found in both muscle cells and nonmuscle cells, and MAF1 from both cell types was indistinguishable by gel retardation and DNase I footprint experiments. The sequence required for MAF1 binding is very similar to the MEF-3 motif, which is an element of the skeletal muscle-specific enhancer of the cardiac troponin C gene. Because MAF1 and MEF-3 are closely related in both recognition sequence and distribution, MAF1 and MEF-3 probably represent the same nuclear factor which may play an important role in muscle gene transcription. Thus, the muscle-specific induction of the aldolase A gene is governed by muscle-specific MEF-2 and existing MEF-3 (MAF1).