Evidence for the involvement of a nuclear NF-kappa B inhibitor in global down-regulation of the major histocompatibility complex class I enhancer in adenovirus type 12-transformed cells

A multiprotein complex consisting of the cellular coactivator p300, AP-1/ATF, as well as NF-kappaB is responsible for the activation of the mouse major histocompatibility class I (H-2K(b)) enhancer A

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes encode highly polymorphic antigens that play an essential role in a number of immunological processes. Their expression is activated in response to a variety of signals and is mediated through several promoter elements among which the enhancer A is one of the key control regions. It contains binding sites for several transcription factors, for example: (i) a well-characterized binding site for rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors in its 3'-end (the H2TF1 or kappaB1 element), (ii) a second kappaB site (the kappaB2 element), which is located immediately adjacent 5' to the H2TF1 element and which is recognized by p65/relA in the human HLA system, and (iii) an AP-1/ATF recognition sequence in the 5' end (EnA-TRE). Here we demonstrate that latter element is bound by at least two distinct heterodimers of the AP-1/ATF transcription factor family, namely c-Jun/ATF-2 and c-Jun/Fra2. Moreover, our data reveal that the enhancer A is simultaneously bound by AP-1/ATF and rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors and that the cellular coactivator p300, which enhances enhancer A-driven reporter gene expression if cotransfected, is recruited to the enhancer A through this multiprotein complex. In contrast to the complete enhancer A, neither the EnA-TRE nor the H2TF1 element on their own are able to confer activation on a heterologous promoter in response to the phorbol ester tumor promoter TPA or the cytokine TNFalpha. Moreover, deletion of any one of the enhancer A control elements results in a dramatic loss of its inducibility by TNFalpha, and point mutations in either the EnA-TRE or the H2TF1 element lead to the loss of AP-1/ATF or NF-kappaB binding, respectively, and to the loss of enhancer A inducibility. Therefore, we conclude that the enhancer A is synergistically activated through a multiprotein complex containing AP-1/ATF, NF-kappaB transcription factors as well as the cellular coactivator p300.

Camouflage and sabotage: tumor escape from the immune system

The field of tumor immunology has made great progress in understanding tumor immune interactions. As a consequence a number of immuno-therapeutic approaches have been successfully introduced into the clinic and a large number of promising therapeutic strategies are investigated in ongoing clinical trials. Evaluation of anti-tumor immunity in such trials as well as in animal models has shown that tumor escape from immune recognition and tumor-mediated suppression of anti-tumor immunity can pose a significant obstacle to successful cancer therapy. Here, we review mechanisms of tumor immune escape and immune-subversion with a focus on the research interests in our laboratory: loss of MHC class I on tumor cells, increased oxidative stress, recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells.

T cell recognition of HLA-A2 restricted tumor antigens is impaired by the oncogene HER2

The HER2 oncogene is frequently over-expressed in human cancers and a promising target for immune therapy. Previous studies have shown that over-expression of mouse or rat HER2 leads to markedly reduced levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and molecules of the antigen processing and presentation machinery (APM), thus resulting in a phenotype promoting tumor escape from the immune system. Our study focuses on analyzing the effect of HER2 on MHC class I antigen presentation and sensitivity to tumor-antigen specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in HLA-A2.1(+) melanoma cell lines. We demonstrate significant inverse correlations both between the expression of HER2 and total MHC class I surface expression as well as between HER2 and HLA-A2. A significant reduction of HLA-A2 levels was found when melanoma and carcinoma cell lines were transfected with a human HER2 gene. A signaling-competent HER2 molecule was crucial for the observed HLA-A2 down-regulation, as transfectants expressing high levels of HER2 mutated in the tyrosine signaling domain did not show altered HLA-A2 expression. Importantly, the human melanoma cell line EST049 demonstrated reduced HER2 and melanoma antigen-specific recognition by CTLs upon HER2 transfection. In addition, high expression of HER2 prevented both IFN-γ mediated HLA-A2 up-regulation and improved recognition by HLA-A2-restricted CTLs in treated cells. Moreover, key APM molecules were down-regulated by HER2. These findings implicate that HER2 over-expressing tumors may be more prone to escape from HLA-A2 restricted CTLs suggesting that immunotherapy approaches inducing an integrated humoral, cellular and innate immune response would be most effective.

The N terminus of adenovirus type 12 E1A inhibits major histocompatibility complex class I expression by preventing phosphorylation of NF-kappaB p65 Ser276 through direct binding

The immune-escape strategy employed by human oncogenic adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) involves downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) transcription by disabling the transactivator NF-kappaB (p50/p65). This is accomplished by the Ad12 E1A protein (E1A-12), which prevents NF-kappaB from becoming phosphorylated by the protein kinase A catalytic subunit (PKAc). In this study, we examined the interactions between E1A-12 and NF-kappaB. Our data show that an E1A-12 mutant retaining the N-terminal 66 amino acids was as effective as the wild-type E1A-12 protein (266 amino acids) in binding p65, preventing phosphorylation of p65-Ser(276), and inhibiting transactivation. In contrast, the nontumorigenic adenovirus type 5 E1A protein (E1A-5) and other E1A-12 mutants lacking the N-terminal regions were severely defective in these activities. Further studies revealed that an N-terminal peptide consisting of residues 1 to 40 of E1A-12 was able to associate directly with p65 in vitro and prevent PKAc from phosphorylating p65-Ser(276). In the absence of the N terminus, there is an almost complete loss of E1A-12 binding to p65. These findings provide solid evidence for the role of the E1A-12 N terminus as an NF-kappaB binding domain. Significantly, this study indicates that the E1A-12 N terminus prevents PKAc from gaining access to p65 to account for Ser(276) hypophosphorylation. The E1A-12 N terminus interaction with p65 serves as a key explanation of how Ad12 downregulates MHC-I transcription and contributes to oncogenesis by escaping cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Identification of genes differentially expressed as result of adenovirus type 5- and adenovirus type 12-transformation

BACKGROUND

Cells transformed by human adenoviruses (Ad) exhibit differential capacities to induce tumours in immunocompetent rodents; for example, Ad12-transformed rodent cells are oncogenic whereas Ad5-transformed cells are not. The E1A gene determines oncogenic phenotype, is a transcriptional regulator and dysregulates host cell gene expression, a key factor in both cellular transformation and oncogenesis. To reveal differences in gene expression between cells transformed with oncogenic and non-oncogenic adenoviruses we have performed comparative analysis of transcript profiles with the aim of identifying candidate genes involved in the process of neoplastic transformation.

RESULTS

Analysis of microarray data revealed that a total of 232 genes were differentially expressed in Ad12 E1- or Ad5 E1-transformed BRK cells compared to untransformed baby rat kidney (BRK) cells. Gene information was available for 193 transcripts and using gene ontology (GO) classifications and literature searches it was possible to assign known or suggested functions to 166 of these identified genes. A subset of differentially-expressed genes from the microarray was further examined by real-time PCR and Western blotting using BRK cells immortalised by Ad12 E1A or Ad5 E1A in addition to Ad12 E1- or Ad5 E1-transformed BRK cells. Up-regulation of RelA and significant dysregulation of collagen type I mRNA transcripts and proteins were found in Ad-transformed cells.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a complex web of cellular pathways become altered in Ad-transformed cells and that Ad E1A is sufficient for the observed dysregulation. Further work will focus on investigating which splice variant of Ad E1A is responsible for the observed dysregulation at the pathway level, and the mechanisms of E1A-mediated transcriptional regulation.

Tumorigenic adenovirus type 12 E1A inhibits phosphorylation of NF-kappaB by PKAc, causing loss of DNA binding and transactivation

Human adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) E1A protein (E1A-12) is the key determinant of viral tumorigenesis. E1A-12 mediates major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) shutoff by inhibiting the DNA binding of the transcriptional activator NF-kappaB (p50/p65) to the class I enhancer. This enables Ad12 tumorigenic cells to avoid class I recognition and lysis by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. In this study, we demonstrate that the phosphorylation of p50 and p65 by the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PKAc) is essential for NF-kappaB DNA binding and transactivation activity. Treatment with H89 and knockdown of PKAc in cells led to the inhibition of phosphorylation at p50 Ser(337) and p65 Ser(276) and loss of DNA binding by NF-kappaB. Importantly, NF-kappaB phosphorylation by PKAc was repressed by tumorigenic E1A-12, but not by nontumorigenic Ad5 E1A (E1A-5). The stable introduction of E1A-12 into Ad5 nontumorigenic cells resulted in a decrease in the phosphorylation of NF-kappaB, loss of NF-kappaB DNA binding, and the failure of NF-kappaB to activate a target promoter, as well as diminution of MHC-I transcription and cell surface expression. Significantly, the amount and enzymatic activity of PKAc were not altered in Ad12 tumorigenic cells relative to its amount and activity in nontumorigenic Ad5 cells. These results demonstrate that E1A-12 specifically prevents NF-kappaB from being phosphorylated by PKAc.

E1A is the component of the MHC class I enhancer complex that mediates HDAC chromatin repression in adenovirus-12 tumorigenic cells

In adenovirus-12 tumorigenic cells, the viral E1A-12 protein mediates transcriptional down-regulation of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes by targeting the class I enhancer. Here, we demonstrate by a combination of antisense and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis that E1A-12 is a physical component of the class I enhancer repression complex, known to comprise COUP-TFII and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1). Significantly, E1A antisense was shown to co-eliminate E1A-12 as well as HDAC1 and HDAC8, but not HDAC3, from the enhancer repression complex. Consistent with elimination of HDAC1 and HDAC8, E1A antisense also resulted in a dramatic increase in histone acetylation, a hallmark of transcriptionally active chromatin. Importantly, MHC class I antigen expression was restored on the surface of E1A antisense-transfected cells. These results demonstrate that E1A-12 is associated with the MHC class I complex and apparently mediates class I transcriptional down-regulation by enacting chromatin repression through HDAC1 and HDAC8.

Adenovirus subversion of immune surveillance, apoptotic and growth regulatory pathways: a model for tumorigenesis

The adenovirus system provides a novel model for evaluating the roles of multiple factors involved in tumour progression. In common with other DNA tumour viruses, adenovirus employs a variety of strategies to evade immune surveillance and perturbs cellular apoptotic and growth regulatory pathways to ensure efficient replication of progeny virions. Such subversion of cellular networks is also found in tumour cells. The mechanism behind the avoidance of immune surveillance and the extent of cellular network interference achieved by adenovirus is still being uncovered and is predicted to have ramifications for the design of cancer therapeutics.

DNA binding of repressor nuclear factor-kappaB p50/p50 depends on phosphorylation of Ser337 by the protein kinase A catalytic subunit

The NF-kappaB p50/p50 homodimer is mainly associated with transcriptional repression. Previously, we demonstrated that phosphorylation of NF-kappaB p50 Ser(337) is critical for DNA binding. Here, we report that p50 Ser(337) is constitutively phosphorylated by the protein kinase A catalytic subunit (PKAc) in three different cell types, which may account for the constant binding of p50/p50 to DNA in unstimulated cells. This was demonstrated first by showing that treatment of cells with PKAc-specific inhibitors blocked p50/p50 DNA binding. Second, phosphorylation of p50 by PKAc was prevented by substitution of Ser(337) to alanine. Third, both p50 and PKAc proteins as well as kinase activity that phosphorylates p50 were found to co-fractionate following gel filtration chromatography. Finally, PKAc and p50 were shown to be able to reciprocally co-immunoprecipitate one another, and their physical association was blocked by a PKA catalytic site inhibitory peptide. This indicates that phosphorylation of p50 Ser(337) involves direct contact with the PKAc catalytic center. In contrast to the dramatic elevation of nuclear p50/p65 heterodimers induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha, DNA binding of p50/p50 homodimers was not greatly altered. Taken together, these findings reveal for the first time that there is a direct interaction between PKAc and p50 that accounts for constitutive phosphorylation of p50 Ser(337) and the existence of DNA bound p50/p50 in the nuclei of most resting cells. This mechanism of DNA binding by p50/p50 following phosphorylation of Ser(337) by PKAc may represent an important means for maintaining stable negative regulation of NF-kappaB gene expression in the absence of extracellular stimulation.

E1A-Based Determinants of Oncogenicity in Human Adenovirus Groups A and C

A broad spectrum of genetic and molecular investigations carried out with group C, Ad2 and Ad5, and with group A, Ad12, have shown that early region1 (E1) gene products are sufficient for complete transformation of rodent cells in vitro by these viruses. During the past quarter century, the processes by which E1A proteins, in cooperation with E1B proteins, perturb the cell cycle and induce the transformed phenotype, have become well defined. Somewhat less understood is the basis for the differential oncogenicity of these two groups of viruses, and the processes by which the E1A proteins of Ad12 induce a tumorigenic phenotype in transformants resulting from infection of cells in vivo and in vitro. In this chapter we review previous findings and present new evidence which demonstrates that Ad12 E1A possesses two or more independent functions enabling it to induce tumors. One of these functions lies in its capacity to repress transcription of MHC class I genes, allowing the tumor cells to avoid lysis by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. We have shown that class I repression is mediated through increased binding of repressor COUP-TF and decreased binding of NF-kB to the class I enhancer. In addition to mediating immune escape, E1A also determines the susceptibility of transformants to Natural Killer (NK) cell lysis, and in this case, also, Ad12 transformants are not susceptible. By using Ad12 mutants containing chimeric E1A Ad12-Ad5 genes, point mutations, or a specific deletion, we have shown that the unique spacer region of Ad12 E1A is an oncogenic determinant, but is not required for transformation in vitro. Given that the E1A regions responsible for class I repression are first exon encoded, we have examined a set of cell lines transformed by these altered viruses, and have found that while they display greatly reduced tumorigenicity, they maintain a wildtype capacity to repress class I transcription. Whether the spacer contributes to NK evasion remains unresolved. Lastly, we discuss the properties of the Ad2/Ad5 E1A C-terminal negative modulator of tumorigenicity, and examine the effects on transformation, tumor induction and transformant tumorigenicity, when the Ad5 negative modulator is placed by chimeric construction in Ad12 E1A.

Identification of genes associated with adenovirus 12 tumorigenesis by microarray

A total of 242 genes were shown to be differentially expressed between haplotypically matched tumorigenic adenovirus 12 (Ad12) and nontumorigenic Ad5-transformed cells using a microarray containing 8734 cDNAs. Eighty-seven of the differentially expressed genes have known roles that include signal transduction, cell growth and proliferation, transcription regulation, protease, and immune functions. The remaining differentially expressed genes are represented by EST cDNAs which have functions that are either completely unknown or proposed, based on sequence similarity to known genes. A subset of 22 differentially expressed genes from the microarray was further examined by Northern blot analyses to verify the identification of new genes associated with Ad12 tumorigenesis. Growth factor receptor binding protein 10 (Grb10) and protease nexin 1 (PN-1) were overexpressed in all of the tumorigenic Ad12-transformed cells examined, whereas expression of these genes was negligible in all of the nontumorigenic Ad5-transformed cells. By contrast, other genes including B cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) were shown to be significantly up-regulated in Ad5-transformed cells as compared to Ad12-transformed cells.

Chromatin repression by COUP-TFII and HDAC dominates activation by NF-kappaB in regulating major histocompatibility complex class I transcription in adenovirus tumorigenic cells

In adenovirus type 12 transformed cells, the down-regulation of MHC class I transcription contributes to the tumorigenic phenotype and is solely mediated by Ad12 E1A. Previous in vitro studies with class I enhancer sequences have indicated that there is an increased binding of repressor COUP-TFII and its associated HDAC and a decreased binding of activator NF-kappaB. In this study, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay in order to determine in vivo whether these proteins regulate class I transcription by affecting chromatin. The ChIP assay revealed that there is lack of chromatin histone acetylation in the region of the class I enhancer in Ad12-transformed cells. This is regulated by histone deacetylation as it was further demonstrated in vivo that COUP-TFII and HDAC are associated with the class I enhancer chromatin. In agreement with in vitro studies, NF-kappaB could be recruited to the class I enhancer following induction by TNF-alpha. However, this enhancer-bound NF-kappaB failed to up-regulate class I expression because the class I enhancer chromatin remained repressed as a result of histone deacetylation by HDAC in association with COUP-TFII. Thus, we have demonstrated for the first time that repression of chromatin through histone deacetylation is a major mechanism in down-regulating class I transcription in Ad12-transformed cells. Finally, Ad12 E1A, a non-DNA binding protein, was shown to be present in the natural protein complex bound to the class I enhancer.

Differential expression of tapasin and immunoproteasome subunits in adenovirus type 5- versus type 12-transformed cells

Adenovirus type 12 (Ad12)-transformed baby rat kidney (BRK) cells are oncogenic in syngeneic immunocompetent rats in contrast to adenovirus type 5 (Ad5)-transformed BRK cells, which are not oncogenic in these animals. A significant factor contributing to the difference in oncogenicity may be the low levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I membrane expression in Ad12-transformed BRK cells as compared with those in Ad5-transformed BRK cells, which presumably results in escape from killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Here we show that, in addition to the decreased levels of expression of the MHC class I heavy chain and the peptide transporter Tap-2, the expression levels of the chaperone Tapasin and the immunoproteasome components MECL-1, PA28-alpha, and PA28-beta also are much lower in Ad12- than in Ad5-transformed BRK cells. The low expression levels of these proteins may contribute to the escape from killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes, because the generation of optimal peptides and loading of these peptides on MHC class I require these components. Increased levels of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 protein and expression of IFN regulatory factor-7 were found in Ad5- versus Ad12-transformed BRK cells. Therefore, the critical alteration leading to the plethora of differences may be an interferon (-related) effect.

In adenovirus type 12 tumorigenic cells, major histocompatibility complex class I transcription shutoff is overcome by induction of NF-kappaB and relief of COUP-TFII repression

The surface levels of major histocompatibility complex class I antigens are diminished on tumorigenic adenovirus type 12 (Ad12)-transformed cells, enabling them to escape from immunosurveillant cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). This is due to the down-regulation of the class I transcriptional enhancer, in which there is strong binding of the repressor COUP-TFII and lack of binding of the activator NF-kappaB. Even though NF-kappaB (p65/p50) translocates to the nuclei of Ad12-transformed cells, it fails to bind to DNA efficiently due to the hypophosphorylation of the p50 subunit. In this study, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) were shown to promote degradation of the NF-kappaB cytoplasmic inhibitor IkappaBalpha and permit the nuclear translocation of a phosphorylated form of NF-kappaB that is capable of binding DNA. Interestingly, when Ad12-transformed cells were treated with TNF-alpha or IL-1beta, class I gene transcription substantially increased when transcriptional repression by COUP-TFII was blocked. This indicates that in cytokine-treated Ad12-transformed cells, COUP-TFII is able to repress activation of class I transcription by newly nucleus-localized NF-kappaB. Our results suggest that Ad12 likely employs a "fail-safe" mechanism to ensure that the transcription of class I genes remains tightly repressed under various physiological conditions, thus providing tumorigenic Ad12-transformed cells with a means of escaping CTL recognition and lysis.

COUP-TFII Is Up-regulated in Adenovirus Type 12 Tumorigenic Cells and Is a Repressor of MHC Class I Transcription

Down-regulation of the MHC class I enhancer in tumorigenic Ad12 cells is associated with strong binding of COUP-TF and negligible binding of activator NF-kappaB. By comparison, in nontumorigenic Ad5 cells, class I expression is high due to negligible binding of COUP-TF and strong binding of NF-kappaB. Here, we show that COUP-TFII, but not COUP-TFI, is expressed in Ad12-transformed cells. The dramatically stronger DNA binding of COUP-TFII to the class I enhancer in Ad12- compared to Ad5-transformed cells correlates with higher COUP-TFII promoter activity and higher levels of COUP-TFII mRNA and protein. Significantly, NF-kappaB p50/p52 double-knockout cells enabled us to demonstrate directly that COUP-TFII can completely repress both nonactivated and NF-kappaB-activated MHC class I transcription.

Reduced phosphorylation of p50 is responsible for diminished NF-kappaB binding to the major histocompatibility complex class I enhancer in adenovirus type 12-transformed cells

Reduced cell surface levels of major histocompatibility complex class I antigens enable adenovirus type 12 (Ad12)-transformed cells to escape immunosurveillance by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), contributing to their tumorigenic potential. In contrast, nontumorigenic Ad5-transformed cells harbor significant cell surface levels of class I antigens and are susceptible to CTL lysis. Ad12 E1A mediates down-regulation of class I transcription by increasing COUP-TF repressor binding and decreasing NF-kappaB activator binding to the class I enhancer. The mechanism underlying the decreased binding of nuclear NF-kappaB in Ad12-transformed cells was investigated. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay analysis of hybrid NF-kappaB dimers reconstituted from denatured and renatured p50 and p65 subunits from Ad12- and Ad5-transformed cell nuclear extracts demonstrated that p50, and not p65, is responsible for the decreased ability of NF-kappaB to bind to DNA in Ad12-transformed cells. Hypophosphorylation of p50 was found to correlate with restricted binding of NF-kappaB to DNA in Ad12-transformed cells. The importance of phosphorylation of p50 for NF-kappaB binding was further demonstrated by showing that an NF-kappaB dimer composed of p65 and alkaline phosphatase-treated p50 from Ad5-transformed cell nuclear extracts could not bind to DNA. These results suggest that phosphorylation of p50 is a key step in the nuclear regulation of NF-kappaB in adenovirus-transformed cells.

The transcriptional silencer protein NRF: a repressor of NF-kappa B enhancers

NF-kappa B/rel proteins are present in most cell types. In concert with other transcriptional factors they regulate a variety of genes which contribute to a wide spectrum of physiological activities like inflammation and apoptosis. An excellent example of this combinatorial regulation takes place in the IFN-beta promoter. In this promoter the fundamental regulatory elements are assembled within less than 100 base pairs including a NF-kappa B/rel enhancer and a negative regulatory element, called NRE. NRE is a member of a new class of transcriptional repressor sequences with a silencing capacity targeted to the NF-kappa B/rel enhancer. NRF is a novel transcriptional factor that binds to NRE. NRF belongs to a major class of transcriptional repressors that interact with specific promoter elements and repress transcription by separable repression domains. Such molecules have been termed active repressors, because they act by inhibitory protein-protein interaction and not simply by steric hindrance.

The transactivation domain of adenovirus E1A interacts with the C terminus of human TAF(II)135

The CR3 activation domain of the human adenovirus E1A protein stimulates transcription by forming protein-protein interactions with DNA sequence-specific binding factors and components of the TFIID complex. Here, we demonstrate that CR3 can complex with the extreme C-terminal 105 amino acids of the human TATA box binding-factor-associated protein, hTAF(II)135. Furthermore, the C-terminal region of hTAF(II)135 can block transcriptional stimulation from an E1A-inducible promoter in vivo. This ability of the C terminus of hTAF(II)135 to bind CR3 and to inhibit E1A-inducible activation is highly specific. These results demonstrate for the first time that a discrete fragment of a mammalian TBP-associated factor which targets a specific activator can impair the stimulation of transcription.

Modulation of antigen processing and presentation by persistent virus infections and in tumors

Cell-mediated immunity is effective against cells harboring active virus replication and is critical for the elimination of ongoing infections, opposing tumor progression, and reducing or preventing the reactivation of persistent viruses and tumor metastasis. The capacity of persistent viruses and tumor cells to maintain a long-term relationship with their host presupposes mechanisms for circumventing antiviral or antitumor defenses. By suppressing the expression of molecules associated with antigen processing and presentation, abrogation of the major immune mechanism that deals with the elimination of infected and transformed cells is achieved. This is accomplished in tumors predominantly by transcriptional downregulation of genes encoding class I major histocompatibility complex antigens, peptide transporter molecules, and the proteasome-associated low molecular mass protease subunits, and in cells expressing viral proteins by interfering with peptide transport and the assembly/transport of class I complexes. In addition, virus-infected cells and selected tumor cells express mainly nonimmunogenic or antagonistic peptide epitopes. This review describes mechanisms used by viruses and in transformed cells for interference with antigen processing and presentation and addresses their significance for in vivo viral persistence and tumor progression.