1
|
Siemund AL, Hanewald T, Kowarz E, Marschalek R. MLL-AF4 and a murinized pSer-variant thereof are turning on the nucleolar stress pathway. Cell Biosci 2022; 12:47. [PMID: 35468859 PMCID: PMC9036721 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00781-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent pathomolecular studies on the MLL-AF4 fusion protein revealed that the murinized version of MLL-AF4, the MLL-Af4 fusion protein, was able to induce leukemia when expressed in murine or human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (Lin et al. in Cancer Cell 30:737–749, 2016). In parallel, a group from Japan demonstrated that the pSer domain of the AF4 protein, as well as the pSer domain of the MLL-AF4 fusion is able to bind the Pol I transcription factor complex SL1 (Okuda et al. in Nat Commun 6:8869, 2015). Here, we investigated the human MLL-AF4 and a pSer-murinized version thereof for their functional properties in mammalian cells. Gene expression profiling studies were complemented by intracellular localization studies and functional experiments concerning their biological activities in the nucleolus. Results Based on our results, we have to conclude that MLL-AF4 is predominantly localizing inside the nucleolus, thereby interfering with Pol I transcription and ribosome biogenesis. The murinized pSer-variant is localizing more to the nucleus, which may suggest a different biological behavior. Of note, AF4-MLL seems to cooperate at the molecular level with MLL-AF4 to steer target gene transcription, but not with the pSer-murinized version of it. Conclusion This study provides new insights and a molecular explanation for the described differences between hMLL-hAF4 (not leukemogenic) and hMLL-mAf4 (leukemogenic). While the human pSer domain is able to efficiently recruit the SL1 transcription factor complex, the murine counterpart seems to be not. This has several consequences for our understanding of t(4;11) leukemia which is the most frequent leukemia in infants, childhood and adults suffering from MLL-r acute leukemia. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13578-022-00781-y.
Collapse
|
2
|
Nucleolus and Nucleolar Stress: From Cell Fate Decision to Disease Development. Cells 2022; 11:cells11193017. [PMID: 36230979 PMCID: PMC9563748 DOI: 10.3390/cells11193017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Besides the canonical function in ribosome biogenesis, there have been significant recent advances towards the fascinating roles of the nucleolus in stress response, cell destiny decision and disease progression. Nucleolar stress, an emerging concept describing aberrant nucleolar structure and function as a result of impaired rRNA synthesis and ribosome biogenesis under stress conditions, has been linked to a variety of signaling transductions, including but not limited to Mdm2-p53, NF-κB and HIF-1α pathways. Studies have uncovered that nucleolus is a stress sensor and signaling hub when cells encounter various stress conditions, such as nutrient deprivation, DNA damage and oxidative and thermal stress. Consequently, nucleolar stress plays a pivotal role in the determination of cell fate, such as apoptosis, senescence, autophagy and differentiation, in response to stress-induced damage. Nucleolar homeostasis has been involved in the pathogenesis of various chronic diseases, particularly tumorigenesis, neurodegenerative diseases and metabolic disorders. Mechanistic insights have revealed the indispensable role of nucleolus-initiated signaling in the progression of these diseases. Accordingly, the intervention of nucleolar stress may pave the path for developing novel therapies against these diseases. In this review, we systemically summarize recent findings linking the nucleolus to stress responses, signaling transduction and cell-fate decision, set the spotlight on the mechanisms by which nucleolar stress drives disease progression, and highlight the merit of the intervening nucleolus in disease treatment.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lu G, Zheng F, Ou J, Yin X, Li S. Investigating Influenza Virus Polymerase Activity in Feline Cells Based on the Influenza Virus Minigenome Replication System Driven by the Feline RNA Polymerase I Promoter. Front Immunol 2022; 13:827681. [PMID: 35693765 PMCID: PMC9185166 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.827681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging influenza virus poses a health threat to humans and animals. Domestic cats have recently been identified as a potential source of zoonotic influenza virus. The influenza virus minigenome replication system based on the ribonucleic acid (RNA) polymerase I (PolI) promoter is the most widely used tool for investigating polymerase activity. It could help determine host factors or viral proteins influencing influenza virus polymerase activity in vitro. However, influenza virus polymerase activity has never been studied in feline cells thus far. In the present study, the feline RNA PolI promoter was identified in the intergenic spacer regions between adjacent upstream 28S and downstream 18S rRNA genes in the cat (Felis catus) genome using bioinformatics strategies. The transcription initiation site of the feline RNA PolI promoter was predicted. The feline RNA PolI promoter was cloned from CRFK cells, and a promoter size of 250 bp contained a sequence with sufficient PolI promoter activity by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. The influenza virus minigenome replication system based on the feline RNA PolI promoter was then established. Using this system, the feline RNA PolI promoter was determined to have significantly higher transcriptional activity than the human and chicken RNA PolI promoters in feline cells, and equine (H3N8) influenza virus presented higher polymerase activity than human (H1N1) and canine (H3N2) influenza viruses. In addition, feline myxovirus resistance protein 1 (Mx1) and baloxavir were observed to inhibit influenza virus polymerase activity in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. Our study will help further investigations on the molecular mechanism of host adaptation and cross-species transmission of influenza virus in cats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Lu
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feiyan Zheng
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiajun Ou
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Yin
- State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China
- *Correspondence: Xin Yin, ; Shoujun Li,
| | - Shoujun Li
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control for Severe Clinical Animal Diseases, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Technological Engineering Research Center for Pet, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Xin Yin, ; Shoujun Li,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davuluri G, Giusto M, Chandel R, Welch N, Alsabbagh K, Kant S, Kumar A, Kim A, Gangadhariah M, Ghosh PK, Tran U, Krajcik DM, Vasu K, DiDonato AJ, DiDonato JA, Willard B, Monga SP, Wang Y, Fox PL, Stark GR, Wessely O, Esser KA, Dasarathy S. Impaired Ribosomal Biogenesis by Noncanonical Degradation of β-Catenin during Hyperammonemia. Mol Cell Biol 2019; 39:e00451-18. [PMID: 31138664 PMCID: PMC6664607 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00451-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased ribosomal biogenesis occurs during tissue hypertrophy, but whether ribosomal biogenesis is impaired during atrophy is not known. We show that hyperammonemia, which occurs in diverse chronic disorders, impairs protein synthesis as a result of decreased ribosomal content and translational capacity. Transcriptome analyses, real-time PCR, and immunoblotting showed consistent reductions in the expression of the large and small ribosomal protein subunits (RPL and RPS, respectively) in hyperammonemic murine skeletal myotubes, HEK cells, and skeletal muscle from hyperammonemic rats and human cirrhotics. Decreased ribosomal content was accompanied by decreased expression of cMYC, a positive regulator of ribosomal biogenesis, as well as reduced expression and activity of β-catenin, a transcriptional activator of cMYC. However, unlike the canonical regulation of β-catenin via glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β)-dependent degradation, GSK3β expression and phosphorylation were unaltered during hyperammonemia, and depletion of GSK3β did not prevent ammonia-induced degradation of β-catenin. Overexpression of GSK3β-resistant variants, genetic depletion of IκB kinase β (IKKβ) (activated during hyperammonemia), protein interactions, and in vitro kinase assays showed that IKKβ phosphorylated β-catenin directly. Overexpressing β-catenin restored hyperammonemia-induced perturbations in signaling responses that regulate ribosomal biogenesis. Our data show that decreased protein synthesis during hyperammonemia is mediated via a novel GSK3β-independent, IKKβ-dependent impairment of the β-catenin-cMYC axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gangarao Davuluri
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michela Giusto
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rajeev Chandel
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nicole Welch
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Khaled Alsabbagh
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sashi Kant
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Avinash Kumar
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Adam Kim
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Prabar K Ghosh
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Uyen Tran
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel M Krajcik
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kommireddy Vasu
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anthony J DiDonato
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph A DiDonato
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Belinda Willard
- Proteomics Research Core Services, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Satdarshan P Monga
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yuxin Wang
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Paul L Fox
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - George R Stark
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Oliver Wessely
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Karyn A Esser
- Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, Institute of Myology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Srinivasan Dasarathy
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jackobel AJ, Zeberl BJ, Glover DM, Fakhouri AM, Knutson BA. DNA binding preferences of S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase I Core Factor reveal a preference for the GC-minor groove and a conserved binding mechanism. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2019; 1862:194408. [PMID: 31382053 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Core Factor (CF) is a key evolutionarily conserved transcription initiation factor that helps recruit RNA polymerase I (Pol I) to the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter. Upregulated Pol I transcription has been linked to many cancers, and targeting Pol I is an attractive and emerging anti-cancer strategy. Using yeast as a model system, we characterized how CF binds to the Pol I promoter by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). Synthetic DNA competitors along with anti-tumor drugs and nucleic acid stains that act as DNA groove blockers were used to discover the binding preference of yeast CF. Our results show that CF employs a unique binding mechanism where it prefers the GC-rich minor groove within the rDNA promoter. In addition, we show that yeast CF is able to bind to the human rDNA promoter sequence that is divergent in DNA sequence and demonstrate CF sensitivity to the human specific Pol I inhibitor, CX-5461. Finally, we show that the human Core Promoter Element (CPE) can functionally replace the yeast Core Element (CE) in vivo when aligned by conserved DNA structural features rather than DNA sequence. Together, these findings suggest that the yeast CF and the human ortholog Selectivity Factor 1 (SL1) use an evolutionarily conserved, structure-based mechanism to target DNA. Their shared mechanism may offer a new avenue in using yeast to explore current and future Pol I anti-cancer compounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashleigh J Jackobel
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
| | - Brian J Zeberl
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
| | - Danea M Glover
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA; School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Aula M Fakhouri
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
| | - Bruce A Knutson
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Ribosome biogenesis is a complex and highly energy-demanding process that requires the concerted action of all three nuclear RNA polymerases (Pol I-III) in eukaryotes. The three largest ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) originate from a precursor transcript (pre-rRNA) that is encoded by multicopy genes located in the nucleolus. Transcription of these rRNA genes (rDNA) by Pol I is the key regulation step in ribosome production and is tightly controlled by an intricate network of signaling pathways and epigenetic mechanisms. In this article, we give an overview of the composition of the basal Pol I machinery and rDNA chromatin. We discuss rRNA gene regulation in response to environmental signals and developmental cues and focus on perturbations occurring in diseases linked to either excessive or limited rRNA levels. Finally, we discuss the emerging view that rDNA integrity and activity may be involved in the aging process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samim Sharifi
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Friedrich Schiller University, 07745 Jena, Germany; , .,Leibniz-Institute on Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Holger Bierhoff
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Friedrich Schiller University, 07745 Jena, Germany; , .,Leibniz-Institute on Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Internal Associations of the Acidic Region of Upstream Binding Factor Control Its Nucleolar Localization. Mol Cell Biol 2017; 37:MCB.00218-17. [PMID: 28874518 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00218-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a member of the high-mobility group (HMG) box protein family, characterized by multiple HMG boxes and a C-terminal acidic region (AR). UBF is an essential transcription factor for rRNA genes and mediates the formation of transcriptionally active chromatin in the nucleolus. However, it remains unknown how UBF is specifically localized to the nucleolus. Here, we examined the molecular mechanisms that localize UBF to the nucleolus. We found that the first HMG box (HMG box 1), the linker region (LR), and the AR cooperatively regulate the nucleolar localization of UBF1. We demonstrated that the AR intramolecularly associates with and attenuates the DNA binding activity of HMG boxes and confers the structured DNA preference to HMG box 1. In contrast, the LR was found to serve as a nuclear localization signal and compete with HMG boxes to bind the AR, permitting nucleolar localization of UBF1. The LR sequence binds DNA and assists the stable chromatin binding of UBF. We also showed that the phosphorylation status of the AR does not clearly affect the localization of UBF1. Our results strongly suggest that associations of the AR with HMG boxes and the LR regulate UBF nucleolar localization.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cell cycle and growth stimuli regulate different steps of RNA polymerase I transcription. Gene 2016; 612:36-48. [PMID: 27989772 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2016] [Revised: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a major control step for ribosome synthesis and is tightly linked to cellular growth. However, the question of whether this process is modulated primarily at the level of transcription initiation or elongation is controversial. Studies in markedly different cell types have identified either initiation or elongation as the major control point. In this study, we have re-examined this question in NIH3T3 fibroblasts using a combination of metabolic labeling of the 47S rRNA, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of Pol I and overexpression of the transcription initiation factor Rrn3. Acute manipulation of growth factor levels altered rRNA synthesis rates over 8-fold without changing Pol I loading onto the rDNA. In fact, robust changes in Pol I loading were only observed under conditions where inhibition of rDNA transcription was associated with chronic serum starvation or cell cycle arrest. Overexpression of the transcription initiation factor Rrn3 increased loading of Pol I on the rDNA but failed to enhance rRNA synthesis in either serum starved, serum treated or G0/G1 arrested cells. Together these data suggest that transcription elongation is rate limiting for rRNA synthesis. We propose that transcription initiation is required for rDNA transcription in response to cell cycle cues, whereas elongation controls the dynamic range of rRNA synthesis output in response to acute growth factor modulation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Diesch J, Hannan RD, Sanij E. Perturbations at the ribosomal genes loci are at the centre of cellular dysfunction and human disease. Cell Biosci 2014; 4:43. [PMID: 25949792 PMCID: PMC4422213 DOI: 10.1186/2045-3701-4-43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene (rDNA) transcription by RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) drives cell growth and underlies nucleolar structure and function, indirectly coordinating many fundamental cellular processes. The importance of keeping rDNA transcription under tight control is reflected by the fact that deranged Pol I transcription is a feature of cancer and other human disorders. In this review, we discuss multiple aspects of rDNA function including the relationship between Pol I transcription and proliferative capacity, the role of Pol I transcription in mediating nucleolar structure and integrity, and rDNA/nucleolar interactions with the genome and their influence on heterochromatin and global genome stability. Furthermore, we discuss how perturbations in the structure of the rDNA loci might contribute to human disease, in some cases independent of effects on ribosome biogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannine Diesch
- Growth Control Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia ; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Ross D Hannan
- Growth Control Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia ; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia ; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia ; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia ; Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia ; School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Elaine Sanij
- Growth Control Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia ; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia ; Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
mTORC1 signaling controls multiple steps in ribosome biogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2014; 36:113-20. [PMID: 25148809 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Revised: 08/07/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Ribosome biogenesis is critical for cells to generate the ribosomes they need for protein synthesis in order to survive, grow and proliferate. It is a complex process, involving the coordinated production of four different RNA species and about 80 proteins, as well as their assembly into functional ribosomal subunits. Given its high demand for amino acids and nucleotides, it is also a metabolically expensive process for the cell. The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a protein kinases which is activated by nutrients, anabolic hormones and oncogenic signaling pathways. mTORC1 positively regulates several steps in ribosome biogenesis, including ribosomal RNA transcription, the synthesis of ribosomal proteins and other components required for ribosome assembly. mTORC1 can thus coordinate stimuli which promote ribosome production with the various steps involved in this process. Although important advances have been made in our understanding of mTORC1 signaling, major questions remain about the molecular mechanisms by which it regulates ribosome biogenesis.
Collapse
|
11
|
Goodfellow SJ, Zomerdijk JCBM. Basic mechanisms in RNA polymerase I transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes. Subcell Biochem 2013; 61:211-36. [PMID: 23150253 PMCID: PMC3855190 DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4525-4_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
RNA Polymerase (Pol) I produces ribosomal (r)RNA, an essential component of the cellular protein synthetic machinery that drives cell growth, underlying many fundamental cellular processes. Extensive research into the mechanisms governing transcription by Pol I has revealed an intricate set of control mechanisms impinging upon rRNA production. Pol I-specific transcription factors guide Pol I to the rDNA promoter and contribute to multiple rounds of transcription initiation, promoter escape, elongation and termination. In addition, many accessory factors are now known to assist at each stage of this transcription cycle, some of which allow the integration of transcriptional activity with metabolic demands. The organisation and accessibility of rDNA chromatin also impinge upon Pol I output, and complex mechanisms ensure the appropriate maintenance of the epigenetic state of the nucleolar genome and its effective transcription by Pol I. The following review presents our current understanding of the components of the Pol I transcription machinery, their functions and regulation by associated factors, and the mechanisms operating to ensure the proper transcription of rDNA chromatin. The importance of such stringent control is demonstrated by the fact that deregulated Pol I transcription is a feature of cancer and other disorders characterised by abnormal translational capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J. Goodfellow
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee , Dundee DD1 5EH , UK
| | - Joost C. B. M. Zomerdijk
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee , Dundee DD1 5EH , UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Stefanovsky VY, Moss T. The splice variants of UBF differentially regulate RNA polymerase I transcription elongation in response to ERK phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:5093-101. [PMID: 18676449 PMCID: PMC2528179 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The mammalian architectural HMGB-Box transcription factor UBF is ubiquitously expressed in two variant forms as the result of a differential splicing event, that in the UBF2 deletes 37 amino acid from the second of six HMGB-boxes. Several attempts to define a function for this shorter UBF2 protein have been less than satisfactory. However, since all mammals appear to display similar levels of the longer and shorter UBF variants, it is unlikely that UBF2 is simply nonfunctional. Previously we showed that phosphorylation of UBF by the MAP-kinase ERK regulates chromatin folding and transcription elongation, explaining the rapid response of the ribosomal RNA genes to growth factors. Here we have investigated the roles the UBF variants play in the response of these genes to ERK activity. We demonstrate that the variant HMGB-box 2 of UBF2 has lost the ability to bind bent DNA and hence to induce chromatin folding. As a result it is significantly less effective than UBF1 at arresting RNAPI elongation but at the same time is more responsive to ERK phosphorylation. Thus, UBF2 functionally simulates a hemi-phosphorylated UBF whose expression may provide a means by which to tune the response of the ribosomal RNA genes to growth factor stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Y Stefanovsky
- Cancer Research Centre and Department of Medical Biology of Laval University, Centre de Recherche de l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, 9 rue McMahon, G1R 3S3 Québec, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lin CY, Navarro S, Reddy S, Comai L. CK2-mediated stimulation of Pol I transcription by stabilization of UBF-SL1 interaction. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:4752-66. [PMID: 16971462 PMCID: PMC1635259 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
High levels of rRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I are important for cell growth and proliferation. In vitro studies have indicated that the formation of a stable complex between the HMG box factor [Upstream binding factor (UBF)] and SL1 at the rRNA gene promoter is necessary to direct multiple rounds of Pol I transcription initiation. The recruitment of SL1 to the promoter occurs through protein interactions with UBF and is regulated by phosphorylation of UBF. Here we show that the protein kinase CK2 co-immunoprecipitates with the Pol I complex and is associated with the rRNA gene promoter. Inhibition of CK2 kinase activity reduces Pol I transcription in cultured cells and in vitro. Significantly, CK2 regulates the interaction between UBF and SL1 by counteracting the inhibitory effect of HMG boxes five and six through the phosphorylation of specific serines located at the C-terminus of UBF. Transcription reactions with immobilized templates indicate that phosphorylation of CK2 phosphoacceptor sites in the C-terminal domain of UBF is important for promoting multiple rounds of Pol I transcription. These data demonstrate that CK2 is recruited to the rRNA gene promoter and directly regulates Pol I transcription re-initiation by stabilizing the association between UBF and SL1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sita Reddy
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California2250 Alcazar Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Lucio Comai
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 323 442 3950; Fax: +1 323 441 2764;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Panov KI, Friedrich JK, Russell J, Zomerdijk JCBM. UBF activates RNA polymerase I transcription by stimulating promoter escape. EMBO J 2006; 25:3310-22. [PMID: 16858408 PMCID: PMC1523182 DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2006] [Accepted: 06/09/2006] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Ribosomal RNA gene transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is the driving force behind ribosome biogenesis, vital to cell growth and proliferation. The key activator of Pol I transcription, UBF, has been proposed to act by facilitating recruitment of Pol I and essential basal factor SL1 to rDNA promoters. However, we found no evidence that UBF could stimulate recruitment or stabilization of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) in reconstituted transcription assays. In this, UBF is fundamentally different from archetypal activators of transcription. Our data imply that UBF exerts its stimulatory effect on RNA synthesis, after PIC formation, promoter opening and first phosphodiester bond formation and before elongation. We provide evidence to suggest that UBF activates transcription in the transition between initiation and elongation, at promoter escape by Pol I. This novel role for UBF in promoter escape would allow control of rRNA synthesis at active rDNA repeats, independent of and complementary to the promoter-specific targeting of SL1 and Pol I during PIC assembly. We posit that stimulation of promoter escape could be a general mechanism of activator function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kostya I Panov
- Division of Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - J Karsten Friedrich
- Division of Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Jackie Russell
- Division of Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Joost C B M Zomerdijk
- Division of Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Division of Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK. Tel.: +44 1382 384242; Fax: +44 1382 388072; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The rRNAs constitute the catalytic and structural components of the ribosome, the protein synthesis machinery of cells. The level of rRNA synthesis, mediated by Pol I (RNA polymerase I), therefore has a major impact on the life and destiny of a cell. In order to elucidate how cells achieve the stringent control of Pol I transcription, matching the supply of rRNA to demand under different cellular growth conditions, it is essential to understand the components and mechanics of the Pol I transcription machinery. In this review, we discuss: (i) the molecular composition and functions of the Pol I enzyme complex and the two main Pol I transcription factors, SL1 (selectivity factor 1) and UBF (upstream binding factor); (ii) the interplay between these factors during pre-initiation complex formation at the rDNA promoter in mammalian cells; and (iii) the cellular control of the Pol I transcription machinery.
Collapse
|
17
|
Hannan KM, Brandenburger Y, Jenkins A, Sharkey K, Cavanaugh A, Rothblum L, Moss T, Poortinga G, McArthur GA, Pearson RB, Hannan RD. mTOR-dependent regulation of ribosomal gene transcription requires S6K1 and is mediated by phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal activation domain of the nucleolar transcription factor UBF. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:8862-77. [PMID: 14612424 PMCID: PMC262650 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.23.23.8862-8877.2003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 343] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key regulator of cell growth acting via two independent targets, ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and 4EBP1. While each is known to regulate translational efficiency, the mechanism by which they control cell growth remains unclear. In addition to increased initiation of translation, the accelerated synthesis and accumulation of ribosomes are fundamental for efficient cell growth and proliferation. Using the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, we show that mTOR is required for the rapid and sustained serum-induced activation of 45S ribosomal gene transcription (rDNA transcription), a major rate-limiting step in ribosome biogenesis and cellular growth. Expression of a constitutively active, rapamycin-insensitive mutant of S6K1 stimulated rDNA transcription in the absence of serum and rescued rapamycin repression of rDNA transcription. Moreover, overexpression of a dominant-negative S6K1 mutant repressed transcription in exponentially growing NIH 3T3 cells. Rapamycin treatment led to a rapid dephosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal activation domain of the rDNA transcription factor, UBF, which significantly reduced its ability to associate with the basal rDNA transcription factor SL-1. Rapamycin-mediated repression of rDNA transcription was rescued by purified recombinant phosphorylated UBF and endogenous UBF from exponentially growing NIH 3T3 cells but not by hypophosphorylated UBF from cells treated with rapamycin or dephosphorylated recombinant UBF. Thus, mTOR plays a critical role in the regulation of ribosome biogenesis via a mechanism that requires S6K1 activation and phosphorylation of UBF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M Hannan
- Trescowthick Research Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Voit R, Grummt I. Phosphorylation of UBF at serine 388 is required for interaction with RNA polymerase I and activation of rDNA transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:13631-6. [PMID: 11698641 PMCID: PMC61092 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.231071698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2001] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Modulation of the activity of the upstream binding factor (UBF) plays a key role in cell cycle-dependent regulation of rRNA synthesis. Activation of rDNA transcription on serum stimulation requires phosphorylation of UBF at serine 484 by G(1)-specific cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)/cyclin complexes. After G(1) progression UBF is phosphorylated at serine 388 by cdk2/cyclin E and cdk2/cyclin A. Conversion of serine 388 to glycine abolishes UBF activity, whereas substitution by aspartate enhances the transactivating function of UBF. Protein-protein interaction studies reveal that phosphorylation at serine 388 is required for the interaction between RNA polymerase I and UBF. The results suggest that phosphorylation of UBF represents a powerful means of modulating the assembly of the transcription initiation complex in a proliferation- and cell cycle-dependent fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Voit
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hirschler-Laszkiewicz I, Cavanaugh A, Hu Q, Catania J, Avantaggiati ML, Rothblum LI. The role of acetylation in rDNA transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:4114-24. [PMID: 11600700 PMCID: PMC60214 DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.20.4114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2001] [Accepted: 08/27/2001] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of NIH 3T3 cells with trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC), resulted in a dose-dependent increase in transcription from a rDNA reporter and from endogenous rRNA genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation using anti-acetyl-histone H4 antibodies demonstrated a direct effect of TSA on the acetylation state of the ribosomal chromatin. TSA did not reverse inhibition of transcription from the rDNA reporter by retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, suggesting that the main mechanism by which Rb blocks rDNA transcription may not involve recruitment of deacetylases to rDNA chromatin. Overexpression of histone transacetylases p300, CBP and PCAF stimulated transcription in transfected NIH 3T3 cells. Recombinant p300, but not PCAF, stimulated rDNA transcription in vitro in the absence of nucleosomes, suggesting that the stimulation of rDNA transcription by TSA might have a chromatin-independent component. We found that the rDNA transcription factor UBF was acetylated in vivo. Finally, we also demonstrated the nucleolar localization of CBP. Our results suggest that the organization of ribosomal chromatin of higher eukaryotes is not static and that acetylation may be involved in affecting these dynamic changes directly through histone acetylation and/or through acetylation of UBF or one of the other components of rDNA transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Hirschler-Laszkiewicz
- The Henry Hood Research Program, Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, The Geisinger Clinic, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822-2618, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stefanovsky VY, Pelletier G, Bazett-Jones DP, Crane-Robinson C, Moss T. DNA looping in the RNA polymerase I enhancesome is the result of non-cooperative in-phase bending by two UBF molecules. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:3241-7. [PMID: 11470882 PMCID: PMC55825 DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.15.3241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The so-called upstream binding factor (UBF) is required for the initial step in formation of an RNA polymerase I initiation complex. This function of UBF correlates with its ability to induce the ribosomal enhancesome, a structure which resembles in its mass and DNA content the nucleosome of chromatin. DNA looping in the enhancesome is probably the result of six in-phase bends induced by the HMG boxes of a UBF dimer. Here we show that insertion/deletion mutations in the basic peptide linker lying between the N-terminal dimerisation domain and the first HMG box of Xenopus UBF prevent the DNA looping characteristic of the enhancesome. Using these mutants we demonstrate that (i) the enhancesome structure does not depend on tethering of the entering and exiting DNA duplexes, (ii) UBF monomers induce hemi-enhancesomes, bending the DNA by 175 +/- 24 degrees and (iii) two hemi-enhancesomes are precisely phased by UBF dimerisation. We use this and previous data to refine the existing enhancesome model and show that HMG boxes 1 and 2 of UBF lie head-to-head along the DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Y Stefanovsky
- Cancer Research Centre and Department of Medical Biology, Laval University, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, 11 Côte du Palais, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Peyroche G, Milkereit P, Bischler N, Tschochner H, Schultz P, Sentenac A, Carles C, Riva M. The recruitment of RNA polymerase I on rDNA is mediated by the interaction of the A43 subunit with Rrn3. EMBO J 2000; 19:5473-82. [PMID: 11032814 PMCID: PMC314014 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/19.20.5473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is dedicated to transcription of the large ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The mechanism of Pol I recruitment onto rDNA promoters is poorly understood. Here we present evidence that subunit A43 of Pol I interacts with transcription factor Rrn3: conditional mutations in A43 were found to disrupt the transcriptionally competent Pol I-Rrn3 complex, the two proteins formed a stable complex when co-expressed in Escherichia coli, overexpression of Rrn3 suppressed the mutant phenotype, and A43 and Rrn3 mutants showed synthetic lethality. Consistently, immunoelectron microscopy data showed that A43 and Rrn3 co-localize within the Pol I-Rrn3 complex. Rrn3 has several protein partners: a two-hybrid screen identified the C-terminus of subunit Rrn6 of the core factor as a Rrn3 contact, an interaction supported in vitro by affinity chromatography. Our results suggest that Rrn3 plays a central role in Pol I recruitment to rDNA promoters by bridging the enzyme to the core factor. The existence of mammalian orthologues of A43 and Rrn3 suggests evolutionary conservation of the molecular mechanisms underlying rDNA transcription in eukaryotes.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Amino Acid Sequence
- Binding Sites
- DNA, Fungal/genetics
- DNA, Fungal/metabolism
- DNA, Ribosomal/genetics
- DNA, Ribosomal/metabolism
- Epistasis, Genetic
- Fungal Proteins/genetics
- Fungal Proteins/metabolism
- Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Macromolecular Substances
- Microscopy, Electron
- Models, Molecular
- Molecular Sequence Data
- Mutation/genetics
- Pol1 Transcription Initiation Complex Proteins
- Promoter Regions, Genetic
- Protein Binding
- Protein Subunits
- RNA Polymerase I/chemistry
- RNA Polymerase I/genetics
- RNA Polymerase I/metabolism
- Recombinant Proteins/genetics
- Recombinant Proteins/metabolism
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae/enzymology
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
- Sequence Alignment
- Transcription Factors/genetics
- Transcription Factors/metabolism
- Transcription, Genetic
- Two-Hybrid System Techniques
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Peyroche
- Service de Biochimie et de Génétique Moléculaire, CEA/Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hannan KM, Hannan RD, Smith SD, Jefferson LS, Lun M, Rothblum LI. Rb and p130 regulate RNA polymerase I transcription: Rb disrupts the interaction between UBF and SL-1. Oncogene 2000; 19:4988-99. [PMID: 11042686 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that the protein encoded by the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (Rb) functions as a regulator of transcription by RNA polymerase I (rDNA transcription) by inhibiting UBF-mediated transcription. In the present study, we have examined the mechanism by which Rb represses UBF-dependent rDNA transcription and determined if other Rb-like proteins have similar effects. We demonstrate that authentic or recombinant UBF and Rb interact directly and this requires a functional A/B pocket. DNase footprinting and band-shift assays demonstrated that the interaction between Rb and UBF does not inhibit the binding of UBF to DNA. However, the formation of an UBF/Rb complex does block the interaction of UBF with SL-1, as indicated by using the 48 kDa subunit as a marker for SL-1. Additional evidence is presented that another pocket protein, p130 but not p107, can be found in a complex with UBF. Interestingly, the cellular content of p130 inversely correlated with the rate of rDNA transcription in two physiological systems, and overexpression of p130 inhibited rDNA transcription. These results suggest that p130 may regulate rDNA transcription in a similar manner to Rb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Hannan
- Henry Hood Research Program, Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Clinic, 100 N. Academy Ave., Danville, Pennsylvania, PA 17822 USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hannan KM, Kennedy BK, Cavanaugh AH, Hannan RD, Hirschler-Laszkiewicz I, Jefferson LS, Rothblum LI. RNA polymerase I transcription in confluent cells: Rb downregulates rDNA transcription during confluence-induced cell cycle arrest. Oncogene 2000; 19:3487-97. [PMID: 10918607 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
When 3T6 cells are confluent, they withdraw from the cell cycle. Concomitant with cell cycle arrest a significant reduction in RNA polymerase I transcription (80% decrease at 100% confluence) is observed. In the present study, we examined mechanism(s) through which transcription of the ribosomal genes is coupled to cell cycle arrest induced by cell density. Interestingly with an increase in cell density (from 3 - 43% confluence), a significant accumulation in the cellular content of hyperphosphorylated Rb was observed. As cell density increased further, the hypophosphorylated form of Rb became predominant and accumulated in the nucleoli. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated there was also a significant rise in the amount of hypophosphorylated Rb associated with the rDNA transcription factor UBF. This increased interaction between Rb and UBF correlated with the reduced rate of rDNA transcription. Furthermore, overexpression of recombinant Rb inhibited UBF-dependent activation of transcription from a cotransfected rDNA reporter in either confluent or exponential cells. The amounts or activities of the rDNA transcription components we examined did not significantly change with cell cycle arrest. Although the content of PAF53, a polymerase associated factor, was altered marginally (decreased 38%), the time course and magnitude of the decrease did not correlate with the reduced rate of rDNA transcription. The results presented support a model wherein regulation of the binding of UBF to Rb and, perhaps the cellular content of PAF53, are components of the mechanism through which cell cycle and rDNA transcription are linked. Oncogene (2000) 19, 3487 - 3497
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Hannan
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guo A, Chen L, Zhao A, Boukghalter B, Pape L. Fission yeast contains an rDNA binding activity that interacts specifically with regulatory sequences for ribosomal RNA synthesis. Gene 2000; 242:183-92. [PMID: 10721711 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00527-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Basal level transcriptional initiation of fission yeast ribosomal RNA genes is dependent on the core ribosomal RNA gene promoter and is stimulated by an upstream rDNA promoter element and by regulatory sequences located in its approximately 3.5 kb intergenic rDNA spacer. A Schizosaccharomyces pombe sequence-specific rDNA binding activity was characterized that interacted with the upstream rDNA promoter region and that associated with required RNA polymerase I transcription components in initial fractionation steps. The rDNA binding activity was further purified and found to specifically associate with a region of the rDNA promoter between -80 and -56. The promoter region required for stable binding correlates with that mediating activated levels of transcriptional initiation. This rDNA binding activity stimulates in vitro rRNA synthesis supported by templates bearing this upstream promoter domain but not by templates lacking it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Guo
- New York University, Department of Chemistry, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klein J, Grummt I. Cell cycle-dependent regulation of RNA polymerase I transcription: the nucleolar transcription factor UBF is inactive in mitosis and early G1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:6096-101. [PMID: 10339547 PMCID: PMC26841 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/1999] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcription of ribosomal RNA genes by RNA polymerase (pol) I oscillates during the cell cycle, being maximal in S and G2 phase, repressed during mitosis, and gradually recovering during G1 progression. We have shown that transcription initiation factor (TIF)-IB/SL1 is inactivated during mitosis by cdc2/cyclin B-directed phosphorylation of TAFI110. In this study, we have monitored reactivation of transcription after exit from mitosis. We demonstrate that the pol I factor UBF is also inactivated by phosphorylation but recovers with different kinetics than TIF-IB/SL1. Whereas TIF-IB/SL1 activity is rapidly regained on entry into G1, UBF is reactivated later in G1, concomitant with the onset of pol I transcription. Repression of pol I transcription in mitosis and early G1 can be reproduced with either extracts from cells synchronized in M or G1 phase or with purified TIF-IB/SL1 and UBF isolated in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors. The results suggest that two basal transcription factors, e.g., TIF-IB/SL1 and UBF, are inactivated at mitosis and reactivated by dephosphorylation at the exit from mitosis and during G1 progression, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Klein
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu CJ, Wang H, Lengyel P. The interferon-inducible nucleolar p204 protein binds the ribosomal RNA-specific UBF1 transcription factor and inhibits ribosomal RNA transcription. EMBO J 1999; 18:2845-54. [PMID: 10329630 PMCID: PMC1171365 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/18.10.2845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
p204, a member of the interferon-inducible p200 family of murine proteins, is primarily nucleolar. We generated cell lines in which p204 was inducible by muristerone. This induction resulted in retardation of cell proliferation and inhibition of rRNA transcription in vivo. Interferon treatment, resulting in p204 induction and retardation of proliferation, also caused inhibition of rRNA transcription in vivo. p204 also inhibited rRNA transcription in vitro. This inhibition was overcome by addition of UBF1, the rRNA-specific transcription factor. A direct interaction between p204 and UBF1 was revealed in vitro in pull-down assays, and in vivo by co-immunoprecipitation from cell extracts. UBF1 bound strongly to at least two regions of p204: the N-terminal segment linked to the conserved 200 amino acid a segment, and the conserved 200 amino acid b segment. Cleavage of the a or b segments into two segments (encoded by single exons) resulted in a strong decrease or loss of binding. The inhibition of rRNA transcription by p204 may be due to the inhibition by p204 of the specific DNA binding of UBF1. This was revealed in electrophoretic mobility shift, magnetic bead and footprinting assays. Thus, p204 serves as a mediator of the inhibition of rRNA transcription by interferon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Liu
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, PO Box 208024, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8024, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tuan JC, Zhai W, Comai L. Recruitment of TATA-binding protein-TAFI complex SL1 to the human ribosomal DNA promoter is mediated by the carboxy-terminal activation domain of upstream binding factor (UBF) and is regulated by UBF phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:2872-9. [PMID: 10082553 PMCID: PMC84080 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.19.4.2872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Human rRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I requires at least two auxiliary factors, upstream binding factor (UBF) and SL1. UBF is a DNA binding protein with multiple HMG domains that binds directly to the CORE and UCE elements of the ribosomal DNA promoter. The carboxy-terminal region of UBF is necessary for transcription activation and has been shown to be extensively phosphorylated. SL1, which consists of TATA-binding protein (TBP) and three associated factors (TAFIs), does not have any sequence-specific DNA binding activity, and its recruitment to the promoter is mediated by specific protein interactions with UBF. Once on the promoter, the SL1 complex makes direct contact with the DNA promoter and directs promoter-specific initiation of transcription. To investigate the mechanism of UBF-dependent transcriptional activation, we first performed protein-protein interaction assays between SL1 and a series of UBF deletion mutants. This analysis indicated that the carboxy-terminal domain of UBF, which is necessary for transcriptional activation, makes direct contact with the TBP-TAFI complex SL1. Since this region of UBF can be phosphorylated, we then tested whether this modification plays a functional role in the interaction with SL1. Alkaline phosphatase treatment of UBF completely abolished the ability of UBF to interact with SL1; moreover, incubation of the dephosphorylated UBF with nuclear extracts from exponentially growing cells was able to restore the UBF-SL1 interaction. In addition, DNase I footprinting analysis and in vitro-reconstituted transcription assays with phosphatase-treated UBF provided further evidence that UBF phosphorylation plays a critical role in the regulation of the recruitment of SL1 to the ribosomal DNA promoter and stimulation of UBF-dependent transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Tuan
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhai W, Comai L. A kinase activity associated with simian virus 40 large T antigen phosphorylates upstream binding factor (UBF) and promotes formation of a stable initiation complex between UBF and SL1. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:2791-802. [PMID: 10082545 PMCID: PMC84072 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.19.4.2791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simian virus 40 large T antigen is a multifunctional protein which has been shown to modulate the expression of genes transcribed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I), II, and III. In all three transcription systems, a key step in the activation process is the recruitment of large T antigen to the promoter by direct protein-protein interaction with the TATA binding protein (TBP)-TAF complexes, namely, SL1, TFIID, and TFIIIB. However, our previous studies on large T antigen stimulation of Pol I transcription also revealed that the binding to the TBP-TAFI complex SL1 is not sufficient to activate transcription. To further define the molecular mechanism involved in large T antigen-mediated Pol I activation, we examined whether the high-mobility group box-containing upstream binding factor (UBF) plays any role in this process. Here, using cell labeling experiments, we showed that large T antigen expression induces an increase in UBF phosphorylation. Further biochemical analysis demonstrated that UBF is phosphorylated by a kinase activity that is strongly associated with large T antigen, and that the carboxy-terminal activation domain of UBF is required for the phosphorylation to occur. Using in vitro reconstituted transcription assays, we demonstrated that the inability of alkaline phosphatase treated UBF to efficiently activate transcription can be rescued by large T antigen. Moreover, we showed that large T antigen-induced UBF phosphorylation promotes the formation of a stable UBF-SL1 complex. Together, these results provide strong evidence for an important role for the large T antigen-associated kinase in mediating the stimulation of RNA Pol I transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Zhai
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Reeder RH. Regulation of RNA polymerase I transcription in yeast and vertebrates. PROGRESS IN NUCLEIC ACID RESEARCH AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 1999; 62:293-327. [PMID: 9932458 DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60511-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
This article focuses on what is currently known about the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I) in eukaryotic organisms at opposite ends of the evolutionary spectrum--a yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and vertebrates, including mice, frogs, and man. Contemporary studies that have defined the DNA sequence elements are described, as well as the majority of the basal transcription factors essential for pol I transcription. Situations in which pol I transcription is known to be regulated are reviewed and possible regulatory mechanisms are critically discussed. Some aspects of basal pol I transcription machinery appear to have been conserved from fungi to vertebrates, but other aspects have evolved, perhaps to meet the needs of a metazoan organism. Different parts of the pol I transcription machinery are regulatory targets depending on different physiological stimuli. This suggests that multiple signaling pathways may also be involved. The involvement of ribosomal genes and their transcripts in events such as mitosis, cancer, and aging is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R H Reeder
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heix J, Vente A, Voit R, Budde A, Michaelidis TM, Grummt I. Mitotic silencing of human rRNA synthesis: inactivation of the promoter selectivity factor SL1 by cdc2/cyclin B-mediated phosphorylation. EMBO J 1998; 17:7373-81. [PMID: 9857193 PMCID: PMC1171082 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We have used a reconstituted cell-free transcription system to investigate the molecular basis of mitotic repression of RNA polymerase I (pol I) transcription. We demonstrate that SL1, the TBP-containing promoter-binding factor, is inactivated by cdc2/cyclin B-directed phosphorylation, and reactivated by dephosphorylation. Transcriptional inactivation in vitro is accompanied by phosphorylation of two subunits, e.g. TBP and hTAFI110. To distinguish whether transcriptional repression is due to phosphorylation of TBP, hTAFI110 or both, SL1 was purified from two HeLa cell lines that express either full-length or the core domain of TBP only. Both TBP-TAFI complexes exhibit similar activity and both are repressed at mitosis, indicating that the variable N-terminal domain which contains multiple target sites for cdc2/cyclin B phosphorylation is dispensable for mitotic repression. Protein-protein interaction studies reveal that mitotic phosphorylation impairs the interaction of SL1 with UBF. The results suggest that phosphorylation of SL1 is used as a molecular switch to prevent pre-initiation complex formation and to shut down rDNA transcription at mitosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Heix
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kihm AJ, Hershey JC, Haystead TA, Madsen CS, Owens GK. Phosphorylation of the rRNA transcription factor upstream binding factor promotes its association with TATA binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:14816-20. [PMID: 9843972 PMCID: PMC24532 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/1998] [Accepted: 10/16/1998] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
rRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I requires both the promoter selectivity factor 1, which is composed of TATA binding protein (TBP) and three TBP-associated factors, and the activator upstream binding factor (UBF). Whereas there is strong evidence implicating a role for phosphorylation of UBF in the control of growth-induced increases in rRNA transcription, the mechanism of this effect is not known. Results of immunoprecipitation studies with TBP antibodies showed increased recovery of phosphorylated UBF from growth-stimulated smooth muscle cells. Moreover, using an immobilized protein-binding assay, we found that phosphorylation of UBF in vivo in response to stimulation with different growth factors or in vitro with smooth muscle cell nuclear extract increased its binding to TBP. Finally, we demonstrated that UBF-TBP binding depended on the C-terminal 'acidic tail' of UBF that was hyperphosphorylated at multiple serine sites after growth factor stimulation. Results of these studies suggest that phosphorylation of UBF and subsequent binding to TBP represent a key regulatory step in control of growth-induced increases in rRNA synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Kihm
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0011, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sullivan GJ, McStay B. Dimerization and HMG box domains 1-3 present in Xenopus UBF are sufficient for its role in transcriptional enhancement. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26:3555-61. [PMID: 9671818 PMCID: PMC147741 DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.15.3555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcription of Xenopus ribosomal genes by RNA polymerase I is directed by a stable transcription complex that forms on the gene promoter. This complex is comprised of the HMG box factor UBF and the TBP-containing complex Rib1. Repeated sequence elements found upstream of the ribosomal gene promoter act as RNA polymerase I-specific trans-criptional enhancers. These enhancers function by increasing the probability of a stable transcription complex forming on the adjacent promoter. UBF is required for enhancer function. This role in enhancement is distinct from that at the promoter and does not involve translocation of UBF from enhancer repeats to the promoter. Here we utilize an in vitro system to demonstrate that a combination of the dimerization domain of UBF and HMG boxes 1-3 are sufficient to specify its role in enhancement. We also demonstrate that the acidic C-terminus of UBF is primarilyresponsible for its observed interaction with Rib1. Thus, we have uncoupled the Rib1 interaction and enhancer functions of UBF and can conclude that direct interaction with Rib1 is not a prerequisite for the enhancer function of UBF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G J Sullivan
- Biomedical Research Centre, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Milkereit P, Tschochner H. A specialized form of RNA polymerase I, essential for initiation and growth-dependent regulation of rRNA synthesis, is disrupted during transcription. EMBO J 1998; 17:3692-703. [PMID: 9649439 PMCID: PMC1170705 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/17.13.3692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Only a small proportion (<2%) of RNA polymerase I (pol I) from whole-cell extracts appeared to be competent for specific initiation at the ribosomal gene promoter in a yeast reconstituted transcription system. Initiation-competent pol I molecules were found exclusively in salt-resistant complexes that contain the pol I-specific initiation factor Rrn3p. Levels of initiation-competent complexes in extracts were independent of total Rrn3p content and varied with the growth state of the cells. Although extracts from stationary phase cells contained substantial amounts of Rrn3p and pol I, they lacked the pol I-Rrn3p complex and were inactive in promoter-dependent transcription. Activity was restored by adding purified pol I-Rrn3p complex to extracts from stationary phase cells. The pol I-Rrn3p complex dissociated during transcription and lost its capacity for subsequent reinitiation in vitro, suggesting a stoichiometric rather than a catalytic activity in initiation. We propose that the formation and disruption of the pol I-Rrn3p complex reflects a molecular switch for regulating rRNA synthesis and its growth rate-dependent regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Milkereit
- BZH Biochemie-Zentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hannan RD, Hempel WM, Cavanaugh A, Arino T, Dimitrov SI, Moss T, Rothblum L. Affinity purification of mammalian RNA polymerase I. Identification of an associated kinase. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:1257-67. [PMID: 9422795 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.2.1257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Overlapping cDNA clones encoding the two largest subunits of rat RNA polymerase I, designated A194 and A127, were isolated from a Reuber hepatoma cDNA library. Analyses of the deduced amino acid sequences revealed that A194 and A127 are the homologues of yeast A190 and A135 and have homology to the beta' and beta subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase I. Antibodies raised against the recombinant A194 and A127 proteins recognized single proteins of approximately 190 and 120 kDa on Western blots of total cellular proteins of mammalian origin. N1S1 cell lines expressing recombinant His-tagged A194 and FLAG-tagged A127 proteins were isolated. These proteins were incorporated into functional RNA polymerase I complexes, and active enzyme, containing FLAG-tagged A127, could be immunopurified to approximately 80% homogeneity in a single chromatographic step over an anti-FLAG affinity column. Immunoprecipitation of A194 from 32P metabolically labeled cells with anti-A194 antiserum demonstrated that this subunit is a phosphoprotein. Incubation of the FLAG affinity-purified RNA polymerase I complex with [gamma-32P]ATP resulted in autophosphorylation of the A194 subunit of RPI, indicating the presence of associated kinase(s). One of these kinases was demonstrated to be CK2, a serine/threonine protein kinase implicated in the regulation of cell growth and proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R D Hannan
- Henry Hood Research Program, Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822-2618, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Seither P, Iben S, Grummt I. Mammalian RNA polymerase I exists as a holoenzyme with associated basal transcription factors. J Mol Biol 1998; 275:43-53. [PMID: 9451438 DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Transcription initiation of ribosomal RNA genes requires RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and auxiliary factors which either bind directly to the rDNA promoter, e.g. TIF-IB/SL1 and UBF, or are assembled into productive transcription initiation complexes via interaction with Pol I, e.g. TIF-IA, and TIF-IC. Here we show that all components required for specific rDNA transcription initiation are capable of physical interaction with Pol I in the absence of DNA and can be co-immunoprecipitated with antibodies against defined subunits of murine Pol I. Sucrose gradient centrifugation and fractionation on gel filtration columns reveals that approximately 10% of cellular Pol I elutes as a defined complex with an apparent molecular mass of > 2000 kDa. The large Pol I complex contains saturating levels of TIF-IA, TIF-IB and UBF, but limiting amounts of TIF-IC. In support of the existence of a functional complex between Pol I and basal factors, the large complex is transcriptionally active after complementation with TIF-IC. The results suggest that, analogous to class II gene transcription, a pre-assembled complex, the "Pol I holoenzyme", exists that appears to be the initiation-competent form of Pol I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Seither
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.p6
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Milkereit P, Schultz P, Tschochner H. Resolution of RNA polymerase I into dimers and monomers and their function in transcription. Biol Chem 1997; 378:1433-43. [PMID: 9461342 DOI: 10.1515/bchm.1997.378.12.1433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
We have further analyzed the requirements of yeast RNA polymerase I (pol I) to initiate transcription at the ribosomal gene promoter. Resolution of yeast whole cell extracts through several chromatographic steps yielded three protein fractions required for accurate initiation. One fraction is composed of TBP associated within a 240 kDa protein complex. The fraction contributing the RNA polymerase I (pol I) activity consists of dimeric and monomeric pol I under conditions optimal for in vitro transcription. The capability to utilize the ribosomal gene promoter correlates with monomeric pol I complexes which are possibly associated with further transcription factors. These initiation competent pol I complexes appeared to be resistant to high salt concentrations. Pol I dimers which represent the majority of the isolated pol I, can be reversibly dissociated into monomers and are only active in non-specific RNA synthesis, if single stranded DNA serves as a template. We suggest a model in which dimeric inactive pol I is converted into an active monomeric form that might be associated with other transcription factors to maintain a stable initiation competent complex.
Collapse
|
37
|
Saez-Vasquez J, Pikaard CS. Extensive purification of a putative RNA polymerase I holoenzyme from plants that accurately initiates rRNA gene transcription in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:11869-74. [PMID: 9342329 PMCID: PMC23640 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.22.11869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
RNA polymerase I (pol I) is a nuclear enzyme whose function is to transcribe the duplicated genes encoding the precursor of the three largest ribosomal RNAs. We report a cell-free system from broccoli (Brassica oleracea) inflorescence that supports promoter-dependent RNA pol I transcription in vitro. The transcription system was purified extensively by DEAE-Sepharose, Biorex 70, Sephacryl S300, and Mono Q chromatography. Activities required for pre-rRNA transcription copurified with the polymerase on all four columns, suggesting their association as a complex. Purified fractions programmed transcription initiation from the in vivo start site and utilized the same core promoter sequences required in vivo. The complex was not dissociated in 800 mM KCl and had a molecular mass of nearly 2 MDa based on gel filtration chromatography. The most highly purified fractions contain approximately 30 polypeptides, two of which were identified immunologically as RNA polymerase subunits. These data suggest that the occurrence of a holoenzyme complex is probably not unique to the pol II system but may be a general feature of eukaryotic nuclear polymerases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Saez-Vasquez
- Biology Department, Washington University, Campus Box 1137, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Voit R, Schäfer K, Grummt I. Mechanism of repression of RNA polymerase I transcription by the retinoblastoma protein. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:4230-7. [PMID: 9234680 PMCID: PMC232276 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.17.8.4230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product pRb restricts cellular proliferation by affecting gene expression by all three classes of nuclear RNA polymerases. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying pRb-mediated repression of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I, we have analyzed the effect of pRb in a reconstituted transcription system. We demonstrate that pRb, but not the related protein p107, acts as a transcriptional repressor by interfering with the assembly of transcription initiation complexes. The HMG box-containing transcription factor UBF is the main target for pRb-induced transcriptional repression. UBF and pRb form in vitro complexes involving the C-terminal part of pRb and HMG boxes 1 and 2 of UBF. We show that the interactions between UBF and TIF-IB and between UBF and RNA polymerase I, respectively, are not perturbed by pRb. However, the DNA binding activity of UBF to both synthetic cruciform DNA and the rDNA promoter is severely impaired in the presence of pRb. These studies reveal another mechanism by which pRb suppresses cell proliferation, namely, by direct inhibition of cellular rRNA synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Voit
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, Heidelberg
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Qureshi SA, Bell SD, Jackson SP. Factor requirements for transcription in the Archaeon Sulfolobus shibatae. EMBO J 1997; 16:2927-36. [PMID: 9184236 PMCID: PMC1169900 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.10.2927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Archaea (archaebacteria) constitute a domain of life that is distinct from Bacteria (eubacteria) and Eucarya (eukaryotes). Although archaeal cells share many morphological features with eubacteria, their transcriptional apparatus is more akin to eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II and III than it is to eubacterial transcription systems. Thus, in addition to possessing a 10 subunit RNA polymerase and a homologue of the TATA-binding protein (TBP), Archaea possess a polypeptide termed TFB that is homologous to eukaryotic TFIIB. Here, we investigate the factor requirements for transcription of several promoters of the archaeon Sulfolobus shibatae and its associated virus SSV. Through in vitro transcription and immunodepletion, we demonstrate that S. shibatae TBP, TFB and RNA polymerase are not complexed tightly with one another and that each is required for efficient transcription of all promoters tested. Furthermore, full transcription is restored by supplementing respective depleted extracts with recombinant TBP or TFB, indicating that TBP-associated factors or TFB-associated factors are not required. Indeed, gel-filtration suggests that Sulfolobus TBP and TFB are not associated stably with other proteins. Finally, all promoters analysed are transcribed accurately and efficiently in an in vitro system comprising recombinant TBP and TFB, together with essentially homogeneous preparation of RNA polymerase. Transcription in Archaea is therefore fundamentally homologous to that in eukaryotes, although factor requirements appear to be much less complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Qureshi
- Wellcome/CRC Institute, and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chen L, Guo A, Pape L. An immunoaffinity purified Schizosaccharomyces pombe TBP-containing complex directs correct initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:1633-40. [PMID: 9092673 PMCID: PMC146630 DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.8.1633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The multi-protein complex SL1, containing TBP, which is essential for RNA polymerase I catalyzed transcription, has been analyzed in fission yeast. It was immunopurified based on association of component subunits with epitope-tagged TBP. To enable this analysis, a strain of Schizosaccharomyces pombe was created where the only functional TBP coding sequences were those of FLAG-TBP. RNA polymerase I transcription components were fractionated from this strain and the TBP-associated polypeptides were subsequently immunopurified together with the epitope- tagged TBP. An assessment of the activity of this candidate SL1 complex was undertaken cross-species. This fission yeast TBP-containing complex displays two activities in redirecting transcriptional initiation of an S. pombe rDNA gene promoter cross-species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription reactions: it both blocks an incorrect transcriptional start site at +7 and directs initiation at the correct site for S. pombe rRNA synthesis. This complex is essential for accurate initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene: rRNA synthesis is reconstituted when this S.pombe TBP-containing complex is combined with a S.pombe fraction immunodepleted of TBP.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Base Sequence
- Chromatography, Affinity
- Chromosomes, Fungal
- Cloning, Molecular
- DNA, Ribosomal/metabolism
- DNA-Binding Proteins/isolation & purification
- DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism
- Escherichia coli
- Molecular Sequence Data
- Oligopeptides
- Peptides
- Pol1 Transcription Initiation Complex Proteins
- Promoter Regions, Genetic
- RNA Polymerase I/metabolism
- RNA, Fungal/biosynthesis
- RNA, Fungal/genetics
- RNA, Ribosomal/biosynthesis
- RNA, Ribosomal/genetics
- Schizosaccharomyces/genetics
- Schizosaccharomyces/metabolism
- TATA-Box Binding Protein
- Transcription Factor TFIID
- Transcription Factors/isolation & purification
- Transcription Factors/metabolism
- Transcription Factors, TFII/metabolism
- Transcription, Genetic
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Chen
- Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Liu Z, Zhao A, Chen L, Pape L. Activated levels of rRNA synthesis in fission yeast are driven by an intergenic rDNA region positioned over 2500 nucleotides upstream of the initiation site. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:659-67. [PMID: 9016610 PMCID: PMC146475 DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.3.659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
RNA polymerase I-catalyzed synthesis of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe approximately 37S pre-rRNAs was shown to be sensitive to regulatory sequences located several kilobases upstream of the initiation site for the rRNA gene. An in vitro transcription system for RNA polymerase I-catalyzed RNA synthesis was established that supports correct and activated transcription from templates bearing a full S. pombe rRNA gene promoter. A 780 bp region starting at -2560 significantly stimulates transcription of ac is-located rDNA promoter and competes with an rDNA promoter in trans, thus displaying some of the activities of rDNA transcriptional enhancers in vitro. Deletion of a 30 bp enhancer-homologous domain in this 780 bp far upstream region blocked its cis-stimulatory effect. The sequence of the S. pombe 3.5 kb intergenic spacer was determined and its organization differs from that of vertebrate, Drosophila, Acanthamoeba and plant intergenic rDNA spacers: it does not contain multiple, imperfect copies of the rRNA gene promoter nor repetitive elements of 140 bp, as are found in vertebrate rDNA enhancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Liu
- Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Steffan JS, Keys DA, Dodd JA, Nomura M. The role of TBP in rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: TBP is required for upstream activation factor-dependent recruitment of core factor. Genes Dev 1996; 10:2551-63. [PMID: 8895657 DOI: 10.1101/gad.10.20.2551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Transcription of Saccharomyces cerevisiae rDNA by RNA polymerase I involves at least two transcription factors characterized previously: upstream activation factor (UAF) consisting of Rrn5p, Rrn9p, Rrn10p, and two more uncharacterized proteins; and core factor (CF) consisting of Rrn6p, Rrn7p, and Rrn11p. UAF interacts directly with an upstream element of the promoter and mediates its stimulatory function, and CF subsequently joins a stable preinitiation complex. The TATA-binding protein (TBP) has been known to be involved in transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases. We found that TBP interacts specifically with both UAF and CF, the interaction with UAF being stronger than that with CF. Using extracts from a TBP (I143N) mutant, it was shown that TBP is required for stimulation of transcription mediated by the upstream element, but not for basal transcription directed by a template without the upstream element. By template competition experiments, it was shown that TBP is required for UAF-dependent recruitment of CF to the rDNA promoter, explaining the TBP requirement for stimulatory activity of the upstream element. We also studied protein-protein interactions and found specific interactions of TBP with Rrn6p and with Rrn9p both in vitro and in the yeast two-hybrid system in vivo. Thus, these two interactions may be involved in the interactions of TBP with CF and UAF, respectively, contributing to the recruitment of CF to the rDNA promoter. Additionally, we observed an interaction between Rrn9p and Rrn7p both in vitro and in the two-hybrid system; thus, this interaction might also contribute to the recruitment of CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Steffan
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine 92697-1700, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bodeker M, Cairns C, McStay B. Upstream binding factor stabilizes Rib 1, the TATA-binding-protein-containing Xenopus laevis RNA polymerase I transcription factor, by multiple protein interactions in a DNA-independent manner. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:5572-8. [PMID: 8816469 PMCID: PMC231556 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.16.10.5572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Initiation of RNA polymerase I transcription in Xenopus laevis requires Rib 1 and upstream binding factor (UBF). UBF and Rib 1 combine to form a stable transcription complex on the Xenopus ribosomal gene promoter. Here we show that Rib 1 comprises TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factor components. Thus, Rib 1 is the Xenopus equivalent of mammalian SL 1. In contrast to SL 1, Rib 1 is an unstable complex that readily dissociates into TBP and associated components. We identify a novel function for UBF in stabilizing Rib 1 by multiple protein interactions. This stabilization occurs in solution in a DNA-independent manner. These results may partially explain the difference in UBF requirement between Xenopus and mammalian systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bodeker
- Biomedical Research Centre, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Scotland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hannan RD, Stefanovsky V, Taylor L, Moss T, Rothblum LI. Overexpression of the transcription factor UBF1 is sufficient to increase ribosomal DNA transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes: implications for cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:8750-5. [PMID: 8710943 PMCID: PMC38745 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The accelerated protein accumulation characteristic of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy results from increased cellular protein synthetic capacity (elevated ribosome content). The rate limiting step in ribosome accumulation is transcription of the rRNA genes. During neonatal cardiomyocyte hypertrophy induced by norepinephrine or spontaneous contraction, changes in the expression of a ribosomal DNA transcription factor, UBF, correlated with increased rates of ribosome biogenesis. We hypothesized that elevated expression of UBF was part of the mechanism by which these hypertrophic stimuli effected increases in the rate of transcription from the rDNA promoter. In this study, we have examined directly the effect of overexpressing UBF on rDNA transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes in culture. In control experiments, a novel reporter construct for rDNA transcription (pSMECAT) showed similar increases in activity in response to hypertrophic stimuli (10(-4) M phenylephrine, 10(-7) M endothelin, and spontaneous contraction) as did the endogenous rRNA genes. When contraction-arrested cardiomyocytes were cotransfected with pSMECAT and increasing amounts of a UBF1 expression vector; a dose-dependent (3-5 fold) increase in rDNA transcription was observed. Western blot analysis confirmed that the overexpressed, FLAG-tagged UBF accumulated in the cardiomyocyte nuclei. The observation that overexpression of UBF1 is sufficient to increase rDNA transcription in neonatal cardiomyocytes provides evidence in support of the hypothesis that the regulation of UBF is a key component of the increased ribosome biogenesis and protein accumulation associated with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R D Hannan
- Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Neil KJ, Ridsdale RA, Rutherford B, Taylor L, Larson DE, Glibetic M, Rothblum LI, Harauz G. Structure of recombinant rat UBF by electron image analysis and homology modelling. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24:1472-80. [PMID: 8628680 PMCID: PMC145827 DOI: 10.1093/nar/24.8.1472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We have studied the structure of recombinant rat UBF (rrUBF), an RNA polymerase I transcription factor, by electron microscopy and image analysis of single particles contrasted with methylamine tungstate. Recombinant rat UBF appeared to be a flat, U-shaped protein with a central region of low density. In the dominant projections, 2-fold mirror symmetry was seen, consistent with the dimerization properties of this molecule, and of dimensions in agreement with the length of DNA that rat UBF protects in footprinting studies. Electron microscopy of various rrUBF-DNA complexes confirmed that our recombinant protein was fully able to bind the 45S rDNA promoter, and that it caused substantial bends in the DNA. Upon extended incubation in a droplet covered by a lipid monolayer at the liquid-air interface, rrUBF formed long filamentous arrays with a railway track appearance. This structure was interpreted to consist of overlapping rrUBF dimers 3.5 nm apart, which value would represent the thickness of the protein. Our results show rrUBF to interact with and bend the promoter DNA into a roughly 10 nm diameter superhelix. Based on all these electron microscopical results, an atomic structure was predicted by homology modelling of the HMG fingers, and connected by energy minimized intervening segments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Neil
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|