Germ line and embryonic expression of Fex, a member of the Drosophila F-element retrotransposon family, is mediated by an internal cis-regulatory control region

Spatiotemporal transcription of the P element and the 412 retrotransposon during embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster and D. willistoni

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile nucleotide sequences which, through changing position in host genomes, partake in important evolutionary processes. The expression patterns of two TEs, P element transposon and 412 retrotransposon, were investigated during Drosophila melanogaster and D. willistoni embryogenesis, by means of embryo hybridization using riboprobes. Spatiotemporal transcription patterns for both TEs were similar to those of developmental genes. Although the two species shared the same P element transcription pattern, this was not so with 412 retrotransposon. These findings suggest that the regulatory sequences involved in the initial development of Drosophila spp are located in the transposable element sequences, and differences, such as in this case of the 412 retrotransposon, lead to losses or changes in their transcription patterns.

The hobo transposon and hobo-related elements are expressed as developmental genes in Drosophila

Transposable elements comprise a significant part of genomes and are involved in their evolvability. The hobo element is found as an active class II transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster that is able to induce gonadal dysgenesis. Some hobo-related sequences (hRSs) are thought to be relics of old "hobo" invasions, and are therefore ancient genomic constituents. However, some of these hRSs are still mobile. The present study analyzed the expression pattern of hobo and a particular type of hRSs, hobo(VAHS). Both elements were shown to be expressed as sense and antisense mRNA transcripts. Expression analysis in whole mount embryos revealed a pattern similar to that of some developmental regulatory genes. Here we suggest that cis-regulatory sequences similar to those in developmental genes exist in hobo sequences. Therefore, hobo mobilization may contribute to the development of new regulatory networks during genomic evolution.

Molecular dissection of Penelope transposable element regulatory machinery

Penelope-like elements (PLEs) represent a new class of retroelements identified in more than 80 species belonging to at least 10 animal phyla. Penelope isolated from Drosophila virilis is the only known transpositionally active representative of this class. Although the size and structure of the Penelope major transcript has been previously described in both D. virilis and D. melanogaster transgenic strains, the architecture of the Penelope regulatory region remains unknown. In order to determine the localization of presumptive Penelope promoter and enhancer-like elements, segments of the putative Penelope regulatory region were linked to a CAT reporter gene and introduced into D. melanogaster by P-element-mediated transformation. The results obtained using ELISA to measure CAT expression levels and RNA studies, including RT-PCR, suggest that the active Penelope transposon contains an internal promoter similar to the TATA-less promoters of LINEs. The results also suggest that some of the Penelope regulatory sequences control the preferential expression in the ovaries of the adult flies by enhancing expression in the ovary and reducing expression in the carcass. The possible significance of the intron within Penelope for the function and evolution of PLEs, and the effect of Penelope insertions on adjacent genes, are discussed.

Suffix-specific RNAi leads to silencing of F element in Drosophila melanogaster

Separate conserved copies of suffix, a short interspersed Drosophila retroelement (SINE), and also divergent copies in the 3′ untranslated regions of the three genes, have already been described. Suffix has also been identified on the 3′ end of the Drosophila non-LTR F element, where it forms the last conserved domain of the reverse transcriptase (RT). In our current study, we show that the separate copies of suffix are far more actively transcribed than their counterparts on the F element. Transcripts from both strands of suffix are present in RNA preparations during all stages of Drosophila development, providing the potential for the formation of double-stranded RNA and the initiation of RNA interference (RNAi). Using in situ RNA hybridization analysis, we have detected the expression of both sense and antisense suffix transcripts in germinal cells. These sense and antisense transcripts are colocalized in the primary spermatocytes and in the cytoplasm of the nurse cells, suggesting that they form double-stranded RNA. We performed further analyses of suffix-specific small RNAs using northern blotting and SI nuclease protection assays. Among the total RNA preparations isolated from embryos, larvae, pupae and flies, suffix-specific small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were detected only in pupae. In wild type ovaries, both the siRNAs and longer suffix-specific Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) were observed, whereas in ovaries of the Dicer-2 mutant, only piRNAs were detected. We further found by 3′ RACE that in pupae and ovaries, F element transcripts lacking the suffix sequence are also present. Our data provide direct evidence that suffix-specific RNAi leads to the silencing of the relative LINE (long interspersed element), F element, and suggests that SINE-specific RNA interference could potentially downregulate a set of genes possessing SINE stretches in their 5′ or 3′ non-coding regions. These data also suggest that double stranded RNAs possessing suffix are processed by both RNAi and an additional silencing mechanism.

On the roles of repetitive DNA elements in the context of a unified genomic-epigenetic system

Repetitive DNA sequences comprise a substantial portion of most eukaryotic and some prokaryotic chromosomes. Despite nearly forty years of research, the functions of various sequence families as a whole and their monomer units remain largely unknown. The inability to map specific functional roles onto many repetitive DNA elements (REs), coupled with the taxon-specificity of sequence families, have led many to speculate that these genomic components are "selfish" replicators generating genomic "junk." The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the selfishness, evolutionary effects, and functionality of REs. First, a brief overview of the range of ideas pertaining to RE function is presented. Second, the argument is presented that the selfish DNA "hypothesis" is actually a narrative scheme, that it serves to protect neo-Darwinian assumptions from criticism, and that this story is untestable and therefore not a hypothesis. Third, attempts to synthesize the selfish DNA concept with complex systems models of the genome and RE functionality are critiqued. Fourth, the supposed connection between RE-induced mutations and macroevolutionary events are stated to be at variance with empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Hypotheses that base phylogenetic transitions in repetitive sequence changes thus remain speculative. Fifth and finally, the case is made for viewing REs as integrally functional components of chromosomes, genomes, and cells. It is argued throughout that a new conceptual framework is needed for understanding the roles of repetitive DNA in genomic/epigenetic systems, and that neo-Darwinian "narratives" have been the primary obstacle to elucidating the effects of these enigmatic components of chromosomes.

kangaroo, a mobile element from Volvox carteri, is a member of a newly recognized third class of retrotransposons

Retrotransposons play an important role in the evolution of genomic structure and function. Here we report on the characterization of a novel retrotransposon called kangaroo from the multicellular green alga, Volvox carteri. kangaroo elements are highly mobile and their expression is developmentally regulated. They probably integrate via double-stranded, closed-circle DNA intermediates through the action of an encoded recombinase related to the lambda-site-specific integrase. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that kangaroo elements are closely related to other unorthodox retrotransposons including PAT (from a nematode), DIRS-1 (from Dictyostelium), and DrDIRS1 (from zebrafish). PAT and kangaroo both contain split direct repeat (SDR) termini, and here we show that DIRS-1 and DrDIRS1 elements contain terminal features structurally related to SDRs. Thus, these mobile elements appear to define a third class of retrotransposons (the DIRS1 group) that are unified by common structural features, genes, and integration mechanisms, all of which differ from those of LTR and conventional non-LTR retrotransposons.

Tissue-specificity of 412 retrotransposon expression in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster

We analyse the expression of the retrotransposon 412 in the soma, testes, and ovaries in populations of Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster, using RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. We find that expression of 412 is highly variable in the soma, confirming previous findings based on Northern blots. No 412RNA is detected in the ovaries by either in situ hybridization or RT-PCR, in any population of either species. Transcripts are, however, detected in the male germline, which show a very characteristic spatial pattern of 412 expression in primary spermatocytes. There is no relationship between expression of the 412 element in the soma and in the testes in the populations. These findings show that the expression of 412 is independently regulated in the soma and the testes, and this raises the question of the real influence of the somatic transcripts on the organism and on the transposition rate.

Transcription analysis of the telomeric repeat-specific retrotransposons TRAS1 and SART1 of the silkworm Bombyx mori

The telomeres of the silkworm Bombyx mori consist of (TTAGG)n repeats and harbor a large number of sequence-specific non-LTR retrotransposons such as TRAS1 and SART1. In order to ascertain if TRAS1 and SART1 are transcribed in vivo and if there is a novel transcription mechanism peculiar to the sequence-specific retrotransposons, we studied their transcription. We detected transcripts of TRAS1 and SART1 by northern hybridization in many tissues and the BmN4 cell line of the silkworm. 5'-Rapid amplification of cDNA ends analysis showed that transcription of both elements was initiated precisely from their own 5'-ends and that most of their genomic copies contained these initiation sites. TRAS1 contained an internal promoter and positively regulating elements in the +1/+581 nucleotides in its 2432 bp 5'-untranslated region (UTR). We could not, however, detect any promoter activity in the SART1 5'-UTR. This difference may be related to the fact that only TRAS1 contained an initiator-like element at its 5'-end. Placing 1-52 units of the telomeric repeat (TTAGG)n upstream of TRAS1 reduced transcription 5-fold. The evidence suggests that most of the TRAS1 genomic copies within the telomeric repeats are weakly transcribed in vivo.

Developmental expression analysis of the 1731 retrotransposon reveals an enhancement of Gag-Pol frameshifting in males of Drosophila melanogaster

Extensive analyses of Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon transcriptions in cultured cells or during development have been reported, but little is known about their translation during the development of the fly. Analysis of the translational products of the 1731 Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon in Kc Drosophila cultured cells has been reported, showing the existence of primary products (Gag and Pol) and of processed polypeptides of various sizes. Study of 1731 retrotransposon expression at both levels of transcription and translation during the development of Drosophila melanogaster, is presented. 1731 transcripts were detected by in situ hybridization and 1731 proteins were detected by immunostaining and immunoblotting in embryos and in adult gonads. 1731 transcripts and proteins were detected in the mesoderm and central nervous system during embryonic development, in nurse cells and follicle cells in adult ovaries and in primary spermatocytes in adult testes. Moreover, Western blot analysis of the 1731 proteins with anti-Gag or anti-Pol antibodies in gonads revealed that the 1731 mRNA could be translated differentially according to the expressing tissue: essentially, ovarian translation and/or processing of 1731 products is different from that operating in testes, where the Gag-Pol fusion polyprotein is the most prominent product. Our results indicate that expression of the 1731 mobile element is regulated not only at the transcriptional level but also at the translational level, and that this regulation is different in the two sexes.