Factors and nucleotide sequences that direct ribosomal DNA transcription and their relationship to the stable transcription complex

Viral subversion of host functions for picornavirus translation and RNA replication

Picornavirus infections lead to symptoms that can have serious health and economic implications. The viruses in this family (Picornaviridae) have a small genomic RNA and must rely on host proteins for efficient viral gene expression and RNA replication. To ensure their effectiveness as pathogens, picornaviruses have evolved to utilize and/or alter host proteins for the benefit of the virus life cycle. This review discusses the host proteins that are subverted during infection to aid in virus replication. It will also describe proteins and functions that are altered during infection for the benefit of the virus.

A novel RNA polymerase I transcription initiation factor, TIF-IE, commits rRNA genes by interaction with TIF-IB, not by DNA binding

In the small, free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii, rRNA transcription requires, in addition to RNA polymerase I, a single DNA-binding factor, transcription initiation factor IB (TIF-IB). TIF-IB is a multimeric protein that contains TATA-binding protein (TBP) and four TBP-associated factors that are specific for polymerase I transcription. TIF-IB is required for accurate and promoter-specific initiation of rRNA transcription, recruiting and positioning the polymerase on the start site by protein-protein interaction. In A. castellanii, partially purified TIF-IB can form a persistent complex with the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter while homogeneous TIF-IB cannot. An additional factor, TIF-IE, is required along with homogeneous TIF-IB for the formation of a stable complex on the rDNA core promoter. We show that TIF-IE by itself, however, does not bind to the rDNA promoter and thus differs in its mechanism from the upstream binding factor and upstream activating factor, which carry out similar complex-stabilizing functions in vertebrates and yeast, respectively. In addition to its presence in impure TIF-IB, TIF-IE is found in highly purified fractions of polymerase I, with which it associates. Renaturation of polypeptides excised from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels showed that a 141-kDa polypeptide possesses all the known activities of TIF-IE.

Identification of a novel 70 kDa protein that binds to the core promoter element and is essential for ribosomal DNA transcription

Mammalian ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) are transcribed by RNA polymerase I and at least two auxiliary factors, UBF and SL1/TFID/TIF-IB. It has also been reported that an additional factor(s) is required to reconstitute efficient initiation of rDNA transcription in vitro, depending upon the procedures of chromatographic separation. In an attempt to elucidate the molecular identity of such yet uncertain activities, we have developed agarose gel shift and UV cross-linking assays to detect proteins directly bound to the core promoter region of murine rDNA. With these techniques, we identified a 70 kDa protein (p70) in the flow-through fraction of a phosphocellulose column (TFIA-fraction). Interestingly, the binding of p70 to the rDNA core promoter was observed only in the presence of the SL1-containing fraction. The probable human orthologue of p70 was also detected in HeLa cells. Consistent with the observation that p70 bound to the core promoter only in the presence of the TFIA- and SL1-fractions, alteration of DNase I footprint pattern over the core promoter element was demonstrated by cooperative action of the TFIA- and SL1-fractions. A reconstituted in vitro transcription assay with further purified p70 indicated that p70 was required for accurate initiation of rDNA transcription. These results indicate that the p70 identified recently by the current DNA-binding experiments represents a novel transcription factor in rDNA transcription.

Histone acetyltransferase and protein kinase activities copurify with a putative Xenopus RNA polymerase I holoenzyme self-sufficient for promoter-dependent transcription

Mounting evidence suggests that eukaryotic RNA polymerases preassociate with multiple transcription factors in the absence of DNA, forming RNA polymerase holoenzyme complexes. We have purified an apparent RNA polymerase I (Pol I) holoenzyme from Xenopus laevis cells by sequential chromatography on five columns: DEAE-Sepharose, Biorex 70, Sephacryl S300, Mono Q, and DNA-cellulose. Single fractions from every column programmed accurate promoter-dependent transcription. Upon gel filtration chromatography, the Pol I holoenzyme elutes at a position overlapping the peak of Blue Dextran, suggesting a molecular mass in the range of approximately 2 MDa. Consistent with its large mass, Coomassie blue-stained sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels reveal approximately 55 proteins in fractions purified to near homogeneity. Western blotting shows that TATA-binding protein precisely copurifies with holoenzyme activity, whereas the abundant Pol I transactivator upstream binding factor does not. Also copurifying with the holoenzyme are casein kinase II and a histone acetyltransferase activity with a substrate preference for histone H3. These results extend to Pol I the suggestion that signal transduction and chromatin-modifying activities are associated with eukaryotic RNA polymerases.

Dimerization and HMG box domains 1-3 present in Xenopus UBF are sufficient for its role in transcriptional enhancement

Transcription of Xenopus ribosomal genes by RNA polymerase I is directed by a stable transcription complex that forms on the gene promoter. This complex is comprised of the HMG box factor UBF and the TBP-containing complex Rib1. Repeated sequence elements found upstream of the ribosomal gene promoter act as RNA polymerase I-specific trans-criptional enhancers. These enhancers function by increasing the probability of a stable transcription complex forming on the adjacent promoter. UBF is required for enhancer function. This role in enhancement is distinct from that at the promoter and does not involve translocation of UBF from enhancer repeats to the promoter. Here we utilize an in vitro system to demonstrate that a combination of the dimerization domain of UBF and HMG boxes 1-3 are sufficient to specify its role in enhancement. We also demonstrate that the acidic C-terminus of UBF is primarilyresponsible for its observed interaction with Rib1. Thus, we have uncoupled the Rib1 interaction and enhancer functions of UBF and can conclude that direct interaction with Rib1 is not a prerequisite for the enhancer function of UBF.

The Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription factor, UBF, has a role in transcriptional enhancement distinct from that at the promoter

Repeated sequence elements found upstream of the ribosomal gene promoter in Xenopus function as RNA polymerase I-specific transcriptional enhancers. Here we describe an in vitro system in which these enhancers function in many respects as in vivo. The principal requirement for enhancer function in vitro is the presence of a high concentration of upstream binding factor (UBF). This system is utilized to demonstrate that enhancers function by increasing the probability of a stable transcription complex forming on the adjacent promoter. Species differences in UBF are utilized to demonstrate that enhancers do not act by recruiting UBF to the promoter, rather UBF performs its own distinct role at the enhancers. UBF function in enhancement differs from that at the promoter, as it is flexible with respect to both the species of UBF and the enhancer element employed. Additionally, we identify a potential role for the mammalian UBF splice variant, UBF2, in enhancer function. We demonstrate that the TATA box binding protein (TBP)-containing component of Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription, Rib1, can interact with an enhancer-UBF complex. This suggests a model in which enhancers act by recruiting Rib1 to the promoter.

Metazoan rDNA enhancer acts by making more genes transcriptionally active

Enhancers could, in principle, function by increasing the rate of reinitiation on individual adjacent active promoters or by increasing the probability that an adjacent promoter is activated for transcription. We have addressed this issue for the repetitive metazoan rDNA enhancer by microinjecting Xenopus oocytes with enhancer-less and enhancer-bearing genes and determining by EM the frequency that each gene type forms active transcription units and their transcript density. We use conditions where transcription requires the normal rDNA promoter and is stimulated 30-50-fold by the enhancer. (In contrast, at saturating template conditions as used in previous EM studies, an aberrant mode of transcription is activated that is not affected by the rDNA enhancer or by the generally recognized rDNA promoter). The active transcription units on enhancer-less genes are found to be as densely packed with nascent transcripts and polymerases as those on enhancer-bearing genes and on the endogenous rRNA genes. Significantly, the enhancer-bearing genes are approximately 30-50-fold more likely to form such active transcription units than enhancer-less genes, consistent with their amounts of transcript. Complementary studies confirm that the enhancer does not affect elongation rate, the stability of the transcription complex, or transcript half-life. These data demonstrate that the repetitive metazoan rDNA enhancer causes more genes to be actively transcribed and does not alter the reinitiation rate on individual active genes.

HMG box 4 is the principal determinant of species specificity in the RNA polymerase I transcription factor UBF

Transcription of ribosomal genes requires, in addition to RNA polymerase I, the trans-acting factors UBF and Rib1 in Xenopus or SL1 in humans. RNA polymerase I transcription is remarkably species specific. Between closely related species SL1 is the sole determinant of this specificity. Between more distantly related species, however, UBF is also a component of this species specificity. Xenopus UBF cannot function in human RNA polymerase I transcription and human UBF cannot function in Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription. Xenopus and human UBFs are remarkably similar at the amino acid sequence level, both containing multiple HMG box DNA binding motifs. The only major difference between xUBF and hUBF is the lack of a HMG box 4 equivalent in xUBF. Utilizing a series of hybrid UBF molecules we have identified HMG box 4 as the principal determinant of species specificity. Addition of human HMG box 4 to xUBF converts it to a form that functions in human RNA polymerase I transcription. Deletion of HMG box 4 from hUBF converts it to a form that functions in Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription. Furthermore, mutations within Xenopus UBF demonstrate that UBF requires a precise arrangement and number of HMG boxes to function in RNA polymerase I transcription.

Stimulation of the mouse rRNA gene promoter by a distal spacer promoter

We show that the mouse ribosomal DNA (rDNA) spacer promoter acts in vivo to stimulate transcription from a downstream rRNA gene promoter. This augmentation of mammalian RNA polymerase I transcription is observed in transient-transfection experiments with three different rodent cell lines, under noncompetitive as well as competitive transcription conditions, over a wide range of template concentrations, whether or not the enhancer repeats alone stimulate or repress expression from the downstream gene promoter. Stimulation of gene promoter transcription by the spacer promoter requires the rDNA enhancer sequences to be present between the spacer promoter and gene promoter and to be oriented as in native rDNA. Stimulation also requires that the spacer promoter be oriented toward the enhancer and gene promoter. However, stimulation does not correlate with transcription from the spacer promoter because the level of stimulation is not altered by either insertion of a functional mouse RNA polymerase I transcriptional terminator between the spacer promoter and enhancer or replacement with a much more active heterologous polymerase I promoter. Further analysis with a series of mutated spacer promoters indicates that the stimulatory activity does not reside in the major promoter domains but requires the central region of the promoter that has been correlated with enhancer responsiveness in vivo.

The RNA polymerase I transactivator upstream binding factor requires its dimerization domain and high-mobility-group (HMG) box 1 to bend, wrap, and positively supercoil enhancer DNA

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is an important transactivator of RNA polymerase I and is a member of a family of proteins that contain nucleic acid binding domains named high-mobility-group (HMG) boxes because of their similarity to HMG chromosomal proteins. UBF is a highly sequence-tolerant DNA-binding protein for which no binding consensus sequence has been identified. Therefore, it has been suggested that UBF may recognize preformed structural features of DNA, a hypothesis supported by UBF's ability to bind synthetic DNA cruciforms, four-way junctions, and even tRNA. We show here that full-length UBF can also bend linear DNA to mediate circularization of probes as small as 102 bp in the presence of DNA ligase. Longer probes in the presence of UBF become positively supercoiled when ligated, suggesting that UBF wraps the DNA in a right-handed direction, opposite the direction of DNA wrapping around a nucleosome. The dimerization domain and HMG box 1 are necessary and sufficient to circularize short probes and supercoil longer probes in the presence of DNA ligase. UBF's sequence tolerance coupled with its ability to bend and wrap DNA makes UBF an unusual eukaryotic transcription factor. However, UBF's ability to bend DNA might explain how upstream and downstream rRNA gene promoter domains interact. UBF-induced DNA wrapping could also be a mechanism by which UBF counteracts histone-mediated gene repression.

The RNA polymerase I transactivator upstream binding factor requires its dimerization domain and high-mobility-group (HMG) box 1 to bend, wrap, and positively supercoil enhancer DNA

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is an important transactivator of RNA polymerase I and is a member of a family of proteins that contain nucleic acid binding domains named high-mobility-group (HMG) boxes because of their similarity to HMG chromosomal proteins. UBF is a highly sequence-tolerant DNA-binding protein for which no binding consensus sequence has been identified. Therefore, it has been suggested that UBF may recognize preformed structural features of DNA, a hypothesis supported by UBF's ability to bind synthetic DNA cruciforms, four-way junctions, and even tRNA. We show here that full-length UBF can also bend linear DNA to mediate circularization of probes as small as 102 bp in the presence of DNA ligase. Longer probes in the presence of UBF become positively supercoiled when ligated, suggesting that UBF wraps the DNA in a right-handed direction, opposite the direction of DNA wrapping around a nucleosome. The dimerization domain and HMG box 1 are necessary and sufficient to circularize short probes and supercoil longer probes in the presence of DNA ligase. UBF's sequence tolerance coupled with its ability to bend and wrap DNA makes UBF an unusual eukaryotic transcription factor. However, UBF's ability to bend DNA might explain how upstream and downstream rRNA gene promoter domains interact. UBF-induced DNA wrapping could also be a mechanism by which UBF counteracts histone-mediated gene repression.

Factor C*, the specific initiation component of the mouse RNA polymerase I holoenzyme, is inactivated early in the transcription process

Factor C* is the component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme (factor C) that allows specific transcriptional initiation on a factor D (SL1)- and UBF-activated rRNA gene promoter. The in vitro transcriptional capacity of a preincubated rDNA promoter complex becomes exhausted very rapidly upon initiation of transcription. This is due to the rapid depletion of C* activity. In contrast, C* activity is not unstable in the absence of transcription, even in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). By using 3'dNTPs to specifically halt elongation, C* is seen to remain active through transcription complex assembly, initiation, and the first approximately 37 nucleotides of elongation, but it is inactivated before synthesis proceeds beyond approximately 40 nucleotides. When elongation is halted before this critical distance, the C* remains active and on that template complex, greatly extending the kinetics of transcription and generating manyfold more transcripts than would have been synthesized if elongation had proceeded past the critical distance where C* is inactivated. In complementary in vivo analysis under conditions where C* activity is not replenished, C* activity becomes depleted from cells, but this also occurs only when there is ongoing rDNA transcription. Thus, both in vitro and in vivo, the specific initiation-conferring component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme is used stoichiometrically in the transcription process.

The RNA polymerase I transcription factor UBF is a sequence-tolerant HMG-box protein that can recognize structured nucleic acids

Upstream Binding Factor (UBF) is important for activation of ribosomal RNA transcription and belongs to a family of proteins containing nucleic acid binding domains, termed HMG-boxes, with similarity to High Mobility Group (HMG) chromosomal proteins. Proteins in this family can be sequence-specific or highly sequence-tolerant binding proteins. We show that Xenopus UBF can be classified among the sequence-tolerant class. Methylation interference assays using enhancer DNA probes failed to reveal any critical nucleotides required for UBF binding. Selection by UBF of optimal binding sites among a population of enhancer oligonucleotides with randomized sequences also failed to reveal any consensus sequence. The minor groove specific drugs chromomycin A3, distamycin A and actinomycin D competed against UBF for enhancer binding, suggesting that UBF, like other HMG-box proteins, probably interacts with the minor groove. UBF also shares with other HMG box proteins the ability to bind synthetic cruciform DNA. However, UBF appears different from other HMG-box proteins in that it can bind both RNA (tRNA) and DNA. The sequence-tolerant nature of UBF-nucleic acid interactions may accommodate the rapid evolution of ribosomal RNA gene sequences.

Factor C*, the specific initiation component of the mouse RNA polymerase I holoenzyme, is inactivated early in the transcription process

Factor C* is the component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme (factor C) that allows specific transcriptional initiation on a factor D (SL1)- and UBF-activated rRNA gene promoter. The in vitro transcriptional capacity of a preincubated rDNA promoter complex becomes exhausted very rapidly upon initiation of transcription. This is due to the rapid depletion of C* activity. In contrast, C* activity is not unstable in the absence of transcription, even in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). By using 3'dNTPs to specifically halt elongation, C* is seen to remain active through transcription complex assembly, initiation, and the first approximately 37 nucleotides of elongation, but it is inactivated before synthesis proceeds beyond approximately 40 nucleotides. When elongation is halted before this critical distance, the C* remains active and on that template complex, greatly extending the kinetics of transcription and generating manyfold more transcripts than would have been synthesized if elongation had proceeded past the critical distance where C* is inactivated. In complementary in vivo analysis under conditions where C* activity is not replenished, C* activity becomes depleted from cells, but this also occurs only when there is ongoing rDNA transcription. Thus, both in vitro and in vivo, the specific initiation-conferring component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme is used stoichiometrically in the transcription process.

Ribosomal gene promoter domains can function as artificial enhancers of RNA polymerase I transcription, supporting a promoter origin for natural enhancers in Xenopus

Enhancers of RNA polymerase I transcription in higher eukaryotes are repetitive elements within the intergenic spacers of rRNA genes. In Xenopus and mouse, enhancers and the gene promoter bind the activator protein, upstream binding factor, and in Xenopus, enhancers also share sequence similarity with an upstream domain of the promoter. This upstream promoter domain can act as an efficient enhancer when polymerized and cloned adjacent to a ribosomal gene promoter injected into oocytes. A core promoter domain lacking similarity with spacer sequences in Xenopus laevis but analogous to a repeated sequence in Xenopus borealis can also function as an enhancer. These data demonstrate functional relatedness between the promoter and enhancers, supporting the hypothesis that enhancers could have evolved from duplicated promoter domains that bind essential transcription factors. The ability of upstream binding factor to bind enhancers inactivated by mutation suggests that upstream binding factor binding alone cannot explain enhancer function.

Function of the growth-regulated transcription initiation factor TIF-IA in initiation complex formation at the murine ribosomal gene promoter

Alterations in the rate of cell proliferation are accompanied by changes in the transcription of rRNA genes. In mammals, this growth-dependent regulation of transcription of genes coding for rRNA (rDNA) is due to reduction of the amount or activity of an essential transcription factor, called TIF-IA. Extracts prepared from quiescent cells lack this factor activity and, therefore, are transcriptionally inactive. We have purified TIF-IA from exponentially growing cells and have shown that it is a polypeptide with a molecular mass of 75 kDa which exists as a monomer in solution. Using a reconstituted transcription system consisting of purified transcription factors, we demonstrate that TIF-IA is a bona fide transcription initiation factor which interacts with RNA polymerase I. Preinitiation complexes can be assembled in the absence of TIF-IA, but formation of the first phosphodiester bonds of nascent rRNA is precluded. After initiation, TIF-IA is liberated from the initiation complex and facilitates transcription from templates bearing preinitiation complexes which lack TIF-IA. Despite the pronounced species specificity of class I gene transcription, this growth-dependent factor has been identified not only in mouse but also in human cells. Murine TIF-IA complements extracts from both growth-inhibited mouse and human cells. The analogous human activity appears to be similar or identical to that of TIF-IA. Therefore, despite the fact that the RNA polymerase transcription system has evolved sufficiently rapidly that an rDNA promoter from one species will not function in another species, the basic mechanisms that adapt ribosome synthesis to cell proliferation have been conserved.

Function of the growth-regulated transcription initiation factor TIF-IA in initiation complex formation at the murine ribosomal gene promoter

Alterations in the rate of cell proliferation are accompanied by changes in the transcription of rRNA genes. In mammals, this growth-dependent regulation of transcription of genes coding for rRNA (rDNA) is due to reduction of the amount or activity of an essential transcription factor, called TIF-IA. Extracts prepared from quiescent cells lack this factor activity and, therefore, are transcriptionally inactive. We have purified TIF-IA from exponentially growing cells and have shown that it is a polypeptide with a molecular mass of 75 kDa which exists as a monomer in solution. Using a reconstituted transcription system consisting of purified transcription factors, we demonstrate that TIF-IA is a bona fide transcription initiation factor which interacts with RNA polymerase I. Preinitiation complexes can be assembled in the absence of TIF-IA, but formation of the first phosphodiester bonds of nascent rRNA is precluded. After initiation, TIF-IA is liberated from the initiation complex and facilitates transcription from templates bearing preinitiation complexes which lack TIF-IA. Despite the pronounced species specificity of class I gene transcription, this growth-dependent factor has been identified not only in mouse but also in human cells. Murine TIF-IA complements extracts from both growth-inhibited mouse and human cells. The analogous human activity appears to be similar or identical to that of TIF-IA. Therefore, despite the fact that the RNA polymerase transcription system has evolved sufficiently rapidly that an rDNA promoter from one species will not function in another species, the basic mechanisms that adapt ribosome synthesis to cell proliferation have been conserved.

RNA polymerase I catalysed transcription of insert viral cDNA

RNA polymerase I has been used for transcription of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) cDNA precisely linked in the anti-sense configuration to both mouse rDNA promoter and terminator segments. In transcription reactions based on Ehrlich ascites cell nuclear extracts, specific uniform RNA products are synthesized in high rates that are comparable to original rDNA template transcriptions. Primer extension reactions show the 5' ends of these RNA transcripts to be located exactly at position +1, corresponding to the 5' end of negative strand HA viral RNA. RNA 3' ends in a first series of constructs were found extended beyond the accepted location of pre-rRNA 3' ends, in using both hybrid cDNA and original rDNA templates. But upon deletion of six basepairs from the rDNA termination region RNA polymerase I transcription has been adapted to yield correctly terminated influenza viral RNA in vitro. This result has been confirmed in an in vivo experiment via synthesis of an anti-sense viral RNA molecule containing the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene, which in turn is recognized at its terminal sequence by viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase for plus strand mRNA synthesis and expression of CAT activity.

The nucleolar transcription activator UBF relieves Ku antigen-mediated repression of mouse ribosomal gene transcription

Previously we have shown that the RNA polymerase I (Pol I)-specific transcription factor UBF stimulates transcription by both facilitating transcription complex formation and by relieving repression exerted by a negative-acting factor which competes for binding of the murine factor TIF-IB to the ribosomal gene promoter (1). We have purified and functionally characterized this repressor protein from Ehrlich ascites cells. The final preparation contained two polypeptides with molecular masses of 75 and 90 kDa, respectively. Both polypeptides interact with the rDNA promoter as revealed by UV-crosslinking experiments. The specificity of binding to the ribosomal gene promoter was demonstrated in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay and by DNase footprinting. The biochemical properties of this negative-acting factor closely resemble those of the Ku antigen, a human nuclear DNA-binding heterodimer which is the target of autoantibodies in several autoimmune diseases. Anti-Ku antibodies precipitate the repressor activity and overcome transcription inhibition. The data demonstrate that regulation of Pol I gene transcription may involve an antirepression mechanism as already documented for Pol II genes and suggest that Ku protein may be causally involved in repressor-mediated down regulation of rRNA synthesis.

Variants of the Xenopus laevis ribosomal transcription factor xUBF are developmentally regulated by differential splicing

XUBF is a Xenopus ribosomal transcription factor of the HMG-box family which contains five tandemly disposed homologies to the HMG1 & 2 DNA binding domains. XUBF has been isolated as a protein doublet and two cDNAs encoding the two molecular weight variants have been characterised. The major two forms of xUBF identified differ by the presence or absence of a 22 amino acid segment lying between HMG-boxes 3 and 4. Here we show that the mRNAs for these two forms of xUBF are regulated during development and differentiation over a range of nearly 20 fold. By isolating two of the xUBF genes, it was possible to show that both encoded the variable 22 amino acid segment in exon 12. Oocyte splicing assays and the sequencing of PCR-generated cDNA fragments, demonstrated that the transcripts from one of these genes were differentially spliced in a developmentally regulated manner. Transcripts from the second gene were found to be predominantly or exclusively spliced to produce the lower molecular weight form of xUBF. Expression of a high molecular weight form from yet a third gene was also detected. Although the intron-exon structures of the Xenopus and mouse UBF genes were found to be essentially identical, the differential splicing of exon 8 found in mammals, was not detected in Xenopus.

Purification of components required for accurate transcription of ribosomal RNA from Acanthamoeba castellanii

The components required for specific transcription of ribosomal RNA were isolated from logarithmically growing Acanthamoeba castellanii. The transcription initiation factor fraction, TIF, and RNA polymerase I were extracted from whole cells at 0.35 M KCl. The extract was fractionated with polyethylenimine, then chromatographed on phosphocellulose (P11) which resulted in the separation of TIF from RNA polymerase I. The fractions containing TIF were further chromatographed on DEAE cellulose (DE52), Heparin Affigel, and Matrex green agarose, followed by sedimentation through glycerol gradients. TIF was purified approximately 17,000-fold, and shown to have a native molecular weight of 289 kD, and to bind specifically to rRNA promoter sequences by DNase I footprinting. The addition of homogeneous RNA polymerase I to this complex permitted the initiation of specific transcription in vitro. The phosphocellulose fractions containing RNA polymerase I were chromatographed on DEAE cellulose, Heparin-Sepharose, DEAE-Sephadex, and sedimented through sucrose gradients. Polymerase I was purified to apparent homogeneity with a yield of 8.1% and a specific activity of 315. It contained one fewer subunit than previously reported. DNase I protection experiments demonstrated that in both partially purified and homogeneous fractions, RNA polymerase I was capable of stable binding to the TIF-rDNA complex, and correctly initiating transcription on rDNA templates.

Domains of the rat rDNA promoter must be aligned stereospecifically

Efficient transcription from the rat rDNA promoter results from an undefined interaction between the core (CPE) and upstream (UPE) promoter elements or the protein complexes which form on them. These interactions were demonstrated by the behavior of promoters that contained either linker-scanning or deletion mutations of the UPE in combination with point mutations of the CPE (bidomain mutants). In vivo transcription experiments using point mutations within the CPE (G----A mutation at either -16 or -7) demonstrated that the CPE may in fact consist of two domains. Whereas both of these mutants were rescued by the addition of UBF to in vitro transcription reactions, the CPE mutant -7A/G was inactive in vivo. Experiments with these bidomain mutants demonstrated that the UPE was required for the rescue of the CPE mutants. We also examined the hypothesis that this interaction might require a stereospecific alignment of the promoter elements. Our results indicate that the promoter consists of several domains with differing responses to mutations that alter the distance between, or within, the promoter elements. For example, the insertion or deletion of half-multiples of the helical repeat distance between -167 and -147 had no significant effect on transcription. On the other hand, some sites were sensitive to deletions of any size but not to insertions of up to 20 bp. The analyses of two sites yielded results suggesting that they lay between domains of the promoter that must be on the same side of the DNA helix for promoter activity. The first of these sites mapped between -106 and -95.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analysis of the rat ribosomal DNA promoter: characterization of linker-scanning mutants and of the binding of UBF

To investigate the mechanism of transcription of the rat ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter, a series of 23 linker-scanning mutants were constructed and assayed in transfected CHO cells and with cell-free extracts. With minor variation, the results of the in vitro and in vivo assays paralleled one another. For example, these assays demonstrated that the mutagenesis of bases from -133 to -124, and those from -106 to -101 of the rDNA promoter significantly inhibited transcription both in vivo and in vitro. Both of these sites lie within the upstream promoter element (UPE) of the rDNA promoter. Several constructs, in particular one that mutated the bases between -49 and -45, were better promoters in vivo than the wild-type promoter. DNAse footprinting experiments with purified UBF, an RNA polymerase I transcription factor, demonstrated the importance of the bases between -106 and -101 for the binding of that factor, providing a positive correlation between the transcription experiments and the binding of UBF to the rDNA promoter.

Domains of the rat rDNA promoter must be aligned stereospecifically

Efficient transcription from the rat rDNA promoter results from an undefined interaction between the core (CPE) and upstream (UPE) promoter elements or the protein complexes which form on them. These interactions were demonstrated by the behavior of promoters that contained either linker-scanning or deletion mutations of the UPE in combination with point mutations of the CPE (bidomain mutants). In vivo transcription experiments using point mutations within the CPE (G----A mutation at either -16 or -7) demonstrated that the CPE may in fact consist of two domains. Whereas both of these mutants were rescued by the addition of UBF to in vitro transcription reactions, the CPE mutant -7A/G was inactive in vivo. Experiments with these bidomain mutants demonstrated that the UPE was required for the rescue of the CPE mutants. We also examined the hypothesis that this interaction might require a stereospecific alignment of the promoter elements. Our results indicate that the promoter consists of several domains with differing responses to mutations that alter the distance between, or within, the promoter elements. For example, the insertion or deletion of half-multiples of the helical repeat distance between -167 and -147 had no significant effect on transcription. On the other hand, some sites were sensitive to deletions of any size but not to insertions of up to 20 bp. The analyses of two sites yielded results suggesting that they lay between domains of the promoter that must be on the same side of the DNA helix for promoter activity. The first of these sites mapped between -106 and -95.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The yeast RNA polymerase I promoter: ribosomal DNA sequences involved in transcription initiation and complex formation in vitro

Using an in vitro transcription system for Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase I, we have analyzed Pol I promoter deletion mutants and mapped the boundaries of the promoter between positions -155 and +27. The 5'-boundary of the minimal core promoter capable of transcription initiation, however, was found to lie between -38 and -26. The 3'-deletion extending to -2 and -5 still allowed some transcription, suggesting that the positioning of Pol I is directed by upstream sequences. The results of in vitro analysis of linker scanning mutants (LSMs) combined with the deletion analysis showed that the promoter consists of three domains: two essential core domains (I: -28 to +8 and II: -76 to -51) and a transcription modulating upstream domain (III: -146 to -91). These results are in general agreement with those obtained in vivo (1). Using a template competition assay we also analyzed these mutant promoters for their ability to form a stable preinitiation complex. We found that the ability of 5'-deletion mutants to sequester an essential factor(s) correlates with their transcriptional activity. In contrast, several 3'-deletions and some LSMs in domain I and II decrease transcription activity greatly without significantly decreasing competition ability. The results indicate that the stimulatory function of domain III is achieved through its interaction with an essential transcription factor(s), although the other domains also participate in this interaction, perhaps directly or through another protein factor.

Cloning and structural analysis of cDNA and the gene for mouse transcription factor UBF

The gene and protein structure of the mouse UBF (mUBF), a transcription factor for mouse ribosomal RNA gene, have been determined by cDNA and genomic clones. The unique mUBF gene consists of 21 exons spanning over 13 kb. Two mRNAs coding for mUBF1 and mUBF2 having 765 a.a. and 728 a.a., respectively, are produced by an alternative splicing of exon 8. It specifies 37 amino acids constituting a part of the regions homologous to high mobility group proteins (HMG box 2). A human UBF (hUBF) cDNA obtained by polymerase chain reaction also indicates the presence of two kinds of mRNAs, the shorter form lacking the same region as mUBF2. Comparison of the cDNAs from hUBF and mUBF revealed an unusual conservation of nucleotide sequence in the 3'-terminal non-coding region. We examined the relative amounts of expression of mUBF1 and mUBF2. The eight tissues studied contained both molecular species, although mUBF2 was the predominant form of UBF. The mRNA of mUBF1 was expressed one half of the mUBF2 in quiescent mouse fibroblasts but reached the same amount in growing state.

Complementary in vivo and in vitro analyses of the interactions between the cis-acting elements of the rat rDNA promoter

Two transcription factors, rat UBF (rUBF) and rat SL-1 are required for the efficient transcription of the rat promoter in vitro. In vitro studies have established that two broadly defined cis-acting domains, the core promoter element and the upstream promoter element, cooperate to direct correct transcription by RNA polymerase I. The ability of UBF to bind to two linker-scanning mutants of the upstream promoter element, which did not respond to the addition of UBF in in vitro transcription assays, was assessed by DNase footprinting. UBF protected the same region of the promoter in the linker-scanning mutant in BSM 129/124 as it did in the wild-type, but did not yield a typical footprint over the promoter in the linker-scanning mutant BSM 106/101. Previously we reported that promoters with mutant core promoters elements, either the guanine at -16 or -7 substituted by an adenine, were inactive in vitro unless the assays were supplemented with UBF. Those results suggested that the binding of UBF upstream of the core was required for the promotion of transcription. The interactions between the core and upstream promoter elements were assessed by constructing double mutants of the promoter. In two constructs the conserved guanines at either -16 or -7 were altered in a deletion mutant (-86) that did not respond to UBF. In a third construct the guanine at -16 in BSM 129/124 was changed to an adenine. These bidomain mutant constructs did not respond to the addition of UBF in an in vitro transcription assay, confirming that the rescue of the core promoter mutants requires an intact and functional upstream promoter element.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Expression of mouse and frog rRNA genes: transcription and processing

This article summarizes a number of lines of investigation of rRNA gene expression that are ongoing in the laboratory. These studies focus on mouse and frog, two distant vertebrate species. One major conclusion is that the basic properties of rRNA gene expression appear remarkably well conserved in evolution, with only relatively minor perturbations between frog and mouse, contrary to the common interpretation of the species-selectively between mouse and human rDNA transcription (e.g., 1). This is true both for the process of rDNA transcription and for the subsequent rRNA processing event.

Trans-acting factors involved in species-specificity and control of mouse ribosomal gene transcription

Faithful and efficient transcription initiation at the mouse ribosomal gene promoter requires besides RNA polymerase I (pol I) four polypeptide trans-acting factors, termed TIF-IA, TIF-IB, TIF-IC, and mUBF. We have partially purified these proteins from cultured Ehrlich ascites cells and show that in the presence of TIF-IA and TIF-IB, pol I directs very low amounts of specific transcripts. Neither TIF-IC nor mUBF on their own significantly stimulate the efficiency of template utilization. However, both factors together strongly activate transcription. Interestingly, factor TIF-IB - the murine homologue of human SL1 - fails to program a human extract to transcribe the murine template, but requires its homologous RNA polymerase I. This finding implicates that not only some rDNA transcription factors but also pol I exhibits species-specific differences. The growth-related factor TIF-IA, on the other hand, stimulates both mouse and human rDNA transcription. This regulatory factor whose amount or activity fluctuates according to the proliferation rate of the cells, is functionally inactivated by antibodies against cdc2 protein kinase. This result together with the observation that transcription is stimulated by ATP-gamma S, an ATP analogue which is a substrate for protein kinases but not for protein phosphatases, strongly suggests that post-translational protein modification is involved in rDNA transcription regulation.

The RNA polymerase I transcription factor xUBF contains 5 tandemly repeated HMG homology boxes

The RNA polymerase I transcription factor UBF has been identified in human, mouse, rat and Xenopus and the primary structure of the human protein has been determined. Human UBF was shown to contain four tandem homologies to the folding domains of the HMG1 and 2 proteins and hence to belong to a previously unrecognised family of 'HMG-box' transcription factors. Here, cDNA clones encoding the Xenopus laevis UBF (xUBF) have been isolated and sequenced. Northern and Southern blots revealed that in tissue culture cells, xUBF is coded on a single major mRNA size species by a small number of genes. The deduced primary structure of xUBF is highly homologous with the human protein except for a central deletion which removes most of one HMG-box. This explains the major size difference between the X. laevis and human proteins and may well explain their different transcriptional specificities. It is shown that xUBF contains 5 tandemly repeated HMG-boxes and that by analogy the human protein contains 6.

Identification of two forms of the RNA polymerase I transcription factor UBF

The structure of the rat homologue of the RNA polymerase I transcription factor UBF was investigated. The sequence of the protein was deduced from the sequence of overlapping cDNAs isolated from a cDNA library and from clones of the products generated by the polymerase chain reaction from random-primed, first-strand cDNA. The sequences of these clones indicated that there were two mRNAs for UBF and that the encoded proteins were similar but not identical. One form of rat UBF was essentially identical to human UBF. The second class of UBF mRNA contained an in-frame "deletion" in the coding region that results in the deletion of 37 amino acids from the predicted protein sequence. This deletion reduces the predicted molecular size of the encoded form of UBF by approximately 4400 from 89.4 kDa to 85 kDa and significantly alters the structure of one of the four HMG-1 homology regions (HMG box-2) in that form of UBF. Evidence for the existence of two mRNAs in rat cells was confirmed by a probe protection assay, and we provide evidence that other vertebrate cells contain these same two forms of UBF mRNA. These results are consistent with the observation that UBF purified from four different vertebrates migrates as two bands upon SDS/PAGE. It has been hypothesized that the HMG motifs are the DNA-binding domains of UBF. Altering one of these "boxes," as in the second form of UBF, may alter the functional characteristics of the transcription factor. Thus, the existence of different forms of UBF may have important ramifications for transcription by RNA polymerase I.

Enhancers for RNA polymerase I in mouse ribosomal DNA

The intergenic spacer of the mouse ribosomal genes contains repetitive 140-base-pair (bp) elements which we show are enhancers for RNA polymerase I transcription analogous to the 60/81-bp repetitive enhancers (enhancers containing a 60-bp and an 81-bp element) previously characterized from Xenopus laevis. In rodent cell transfection assays, the 140-bp repeats stimulated an adjacent mouse polymerase I promoter when located in cis and competed with it when located in trans. Remarkably, in frog oocyte injection assays, the 140-bp repeats enhanced a frog ribosomal gene promoter as strongly as did the homologous 60/81-bp repeats. Mouse 140-bp repeats also competed against frog promoters in trans. The 140-bp repeats bound UBF, a DNA-binding protein we have purified from mouse extracts that is the mouse homolog of polymerase I transcription factors previously isolated from frogs and humans. The DNA-binding properties of UBF are conserved from the mouse to the frog. The same regulatory elements (terminators, gene and spacer promoters, and enhancers) have now been identified in both a mammalian and an amphibian spacer, and they are found in the same relative order. Therefore, this arrangement of elements probably is widespread in nature and has important functional consequences.

The mouse ribosomal DNA promoter has more stringent requirements in vivo than in vitro

Using mouse ribosomal DNA templates bearing polymerase I terminators to prevent transcriptional interference (S. L. Henderson, K. Ryan, and B. Sollner-Webb, Genes Dev. 3:212-223, 1989) and facilitate promoter analysis in intact cells, we demonstrate that a -140 promoter domain (as well as the core region) is essential for appreciable levels of initiation in vivo. This in vivo polymerase I promoter can also be detected in vitro but only under very stringent conditions.

The mouse ribosomal DNA promoter has more stringent requirements in vivo than in vitro

Using mouse ribosomal DNA templates bearing polymerase I terminators to prevent transcriptional interference (S. L. Henderson, K. Ryan, and B. Sollner-Webb, Genes Dev. 3:212-223, 1989) and facilitate promoter analysis in intact cells, we demonstrate that a -140 promoter domain (as well as the core region) is essential for appreciable levels of initiation in vivo. This in vivo polymerase I promoter can also be detected in vitro but only under very stringent conditions.

Enhancers for RNA polymerase I in mouse ribosomal DNA

The intergenic spacer of the mouse ribosomal genes contains repetitive 140-base-pair (bp) elements which we show are enhancers for RNA polymerase I transcription analogous to the 60/81-bp repetitive enhancers (enhancers containing a 60-bp and an 81-bp element) previously characterized from Xenopus laevis. In rodent cell transfection assays, the 140-bp repeats stimulated an adjacent mouse polymerase I promoter when located in cis and competed with it when located in trans. Remarkably, in frog oocyte injection assays, the 140-bp repeats enhanced a frog ribosomal gene promoter as strongly as did the homologous 60/81-bp repeats. Mouse 140-bp repeats also competed against frog promoters in trans. The 140-bp repeats bound UBF, a DNA-binding protein we have purified from mouse extracts that is the mouse homolog of polymerase I transcription factors previously isolated from frogs and humans. The DNA-binding properties of UBF are conserved from the mouse to the frog. The same regulatory elements (terminators, gene and spacer promoters, and enhancers) have now been identified in both a mammalian and an amphibian spacer, and they are found in the same relative order. Therefore, this arrangement of elements probably is widespread in nature and has important functional consequences.

rUBF, an RNA polymerase I transcription factor from rats, produces DNase I footprints identical to those produced by xUBF, its homolog from frogs

Rat cells contain a DNA-binding polymerase I transcription factor, rUBF, with properties similar to UBF homologs that have been purified from both human (hUBF) and frog (xUBF) cells. In this note we report the affinity purification of rUBF to apparent homogeneity and show that UBFs from both rat and frog have identical footprinting characteristics on templates from either species. Furthermore, xUBF was able to stimulate transcription from rat RNA polymerase I promoters in a partially fractionated rat extract that was UBF dependent. These results strengthen the conclusion that all vertebrate cells contain a UBF homolog whose DNA-binding specificity and function have been strongly conserved.

rUBF, an RNA polymerase I transcription factor from rats, produces DNase I footprints identical to those produced by xUBF, its homolog from frogs

Rat cells contain a DNA-binding polymerase I transcription factor, rUBF, with properties similar to UBF homologs that have been purified from both human (hUBF) and frog (xUBF) cells. In this note we report the affinity purification of rUBF to apparent homogeneity and show that UBFs from both rat and frog have identical footprinting characteristics on templates from either species. Furthermore, xUBF was able to stimulate transcription from rat RNA polymerase I promoters in a partially fractionated rat extract that was UBF dependent. These results strengthen the conclusion that all vertebrate cells contain a UBF homolog whose DNA-binding specificity and function have been strongly conserved.

Characterization of factors that direct transcription of rat ribosomal DNA

The protein components that direct and activate accurate transcription by rat RNA polymerase I were studied in extracts of Novikoff hepatoma ascites cells. A minimum of at least two components, besides RNA polymerase I, that are necessary for efficient utilization of templates were identified. The first factor, rat SL-1, is required for species-specific recognition of the rat RNA polymerase I promoter and may be sufficient to direct transcription by pure RNA polymerase I. Rat SL-1 directed the transcription of templates deleted to -31, the 5' boundary of the core promoter element (+1 being the transcription initiation site). The second factor, rUBF, increased the efficiency of template utilization. Transcription of deletion mutants indicated that the 5' boundary of the domain required for rUBF lay between -137 and -127. Experiments using block substitution mutants confirmed and extended these observations. Transcription experiments using those mutants demonstrated that two regions within the upstream promoter element were required for optimal levels of transcription in vitro. The first region was centered on nucleotides -129 and -124. The 5' boundary of the second domain mapped to between nucleotides -106 and -101. DNase footprint experiments using highly purified rUBF indicated that rUBF bound between -130 and -50. However, mutation of nucleotides -129 and -124 did not affect the rUBF footprint. These results indicate that basal levels of transcription by RNA polymerase I may require only SL-1 and the core promoter element. However, higher transcription levels are mediated by additional interactions of rUBF, and possibly SL-1, bound to distal promoter elements.

Characterization of factors that direct transcription of rat ribosomal DNA

The protein components that direct and activate accurate transcription by rat RNA polymerase I were studied in extracts of Novikoff hepatoma ascites cells. A minimum of at least two components, besides RNA polymerase I, that are necessary for efficient utilization of templates were identified. The first factor, rat SL-1, is required for species-specific recognition of the rat RNA polymerase I promoter and may be sufficient to direct transcription by pure RNA polymerase I. Rat SL-1 directed the transcription of templates deleted to -31, the 5' boundary of the core promoter element (+1 being the transcription initiation site). The second factor, rUBF, increased the efficiency of template utilization. Transcription of deletion mutants indicated that the 5' boundary of the domain required for rUBF lay between -137 and -127. Experiments using block substitution mutants confirmed and extended these observations. Transcription experiments using those mutants demonstrated that two regions within the upstream promoter element were required for optimal levels of transcription in vitro. The first region was centered on nucleotides -129 and -124. The 5' boundary of the second domain mapped to between nucleotides -106 and -101. DNase footprint experiments using highly purified rUBF indicated that rUBF bound between -130 and -50. However, mutation of nucleotides -129 and -124 did not affect the rUBF footprint. These results indicate that basal levels of transcription by RNA polymerase I may require only SL-1 and the core promoter element. However, higher transcription levels are mediated by additional interactions of rUBF, and possibly SL-1, bound to distal promoter elements.

Two complex regions, including a TATA sequence, are required for transcription by RNA polymerase I in Neurospora crassa

In order to define the RNA polymerase I transcriptional apparatus and how it might interact with regulatory signals, the DNA sequences necessary for 40S rRNA transcription in Neurospora crassa were determined. A systematic set of deletion, substitution and insertion mutations were assayed in a homologous in vitro system. The sequences required for transcription of the gene consist of two large domains (I and II) from -113 to -37, and -29 to +4, respectively. Complete deletion of either domain abolished transcription. Upstream sequences confer a small stimulation of transcription. Domain II includes a TATA sequence at -5 which is sensitive to a small (2 bp) substitution and which is conserved among the large rRNA genes of many organisms. Domain I includes a sequence, termed the 'Ribo box', which is also required for transcription of the Neurospora 5S rRNA genes (1), and which occurs in the 5' region of a Neurospora ribosomal protein gene. The 5S and 40S Ribo boxes are shown to be functionally interchangeable.

Interaction of RNA polymerase I transcription factors with a promoter in the nontranscribed spacer of rat ribosomal DNA

The spacer promoter of the rat rDNA repeat consists of two functional domains: a core (proximal) element that is sufficient for transcription in vitro, and an upstream (distal) promoter element that increases the efficiency of transcription. Two of the transcription factors that interact with the 45S promoter also interact with the spacer promoter. Rat SL-1, is required for transcription of the spacer promoter by heterologous extracts, e.g. human, and rat SF-1 is required for efficient transcription in vitro. Order-of-addition experiments demonstrated that the preinitiation complex formed by these factors on the spacer promoter is not as stable as the complex formed on the 45S promoter. DNase 1 footprinting experiments demonstrated binding sites for rat SL-1 and SF-1 on the distal element of the spacer promoter. The topology of the domains of the spacer promoter may explain both the reduced stability of the preinitiation complex formed on that promoter and the lower efficiency of transcription of that promoter when compared to the 45S promoter.

Isolation and functional characterization of TIF-IB, a factor that confers promoter specificity to mouse RNA polymerase I

The murine ribosomal gene promoter contains two cis-acting control elements which operate in concert to promote efficient and accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. The start site proximal core element which is indispensable for promoter recognition by RNA polymerase I (pol I) encompasses sequences from position -39 to -1. An upstream control element (UCE) which is located between nucleotides -142 and -112 stimulates the efficiency of transcription initiation both in vivo and in vitro. Here we report the isolation and functional characterization of a specific rDNA binding protein, the transcription initiation factor TIF-IB, which specifically interacts with the core region of the mouse ribosomal RNA gene promoter. Highly purified TIF-IB complements transcriptional activity in the presence of two other essential initiation factors TIF-IA and TIF-IC. We demonstrate that the binding efficiency of purified TIF-IB to the core promoter is strongly enhanced by the presence in cis of the UCE. This positive effect of upstream sequences on TIF-IB binding is observed throughout the purification procedure suggesting that the synergistic action of the two distant promoter elements is not mediated by a protein different from TIF-IB. Increasing the distance between both control elements still facilitates stable factor binding but eliminates transcriptional activation. The results demonstrate that TIF-IB binding to the rDNA promoter is an essential early step in the assembly of a functional transcription initiation complex. The subsequent interaction of TIF-IB with other auxiliary transcription initiation factors, however, requires the correct spacing between the UCE and the core promoter element.

The Xenopus ribosomal DNA 60- and 81-base-pair repeats are position-dependent enhancers that function at the establishment of the preinitiation complex: analysis in vivo and in an enhancer-responsive in vitro system

Although it is generally believed that the 60- and 81-base-pair (60/81-bp) repeats of the Xenopus laevis ribosomal DNA (rDNA) spacer are position-independent transcriptional enhancers, this has not been shown directly. We have now developed a critical assay which proves that the 60/81-bp repeats do, in fact, stimulate transcription from promoters in cis and that they function in both orientations and when up to 1 kilobase pair from the initiation site. However, contrary to the widely accepted view, these elements are found to be highly position dependent, for they have no net effect when downstream of the initiation site within the transcribed region and they behave as transcriptional silencers of promoters in cis when moved greater than 2 kilobase pairs upstream of the initiation site. The 60/81-bp elements therefore are position-dependent 5' enhancers. We also found that this rDNA enhancer was polymerase I specific and that it was composed of duplicated, individually functional elements. Finally, we report an in vitro system that reproduces both cis enhancement and trans competition by the 60/81-bp repeats. Sequential-addition studies in this system demonstrated that the rDNA enhancer functions in trans at or before establishment of the stable transcription complex, not subsequently at each round of transcription.

Transformation of Tetrahymena thermophila with a mutated circular ribosomal DNA plasmid vector

A circular plasmid containing a complete Tetrahymena thermophila rRNA gene (rDNA), with a tandem repeat of a 1.9-kilobase-pair segment encompassing the replication origin and the rRNA promoter, and a polylinker in the 3' nontranscribed spacer, was used to transform T. thermophila by microinjection. Most (20/21) stable transformants contained only recombinant linear palindromic rDNA molecules carrying rDNA sequences from both the donor plasmid and the recipient cell, as shown previously. However, in one transformant, the circular plasmid initially outreplicated the endogenous rDNA and was the major rDNA form for up to 65 generations. Stable circular replicons have not been reported previously in Tetrahymena. A single point mutation (+G) was identified in the repeated promoter of the plasmid maintained in this transformant. After recovery from the Tetrahymena transformant and recloning in Escherichia coli, the mutated circular plasmid again transformed Tetrahymena with stable maintenance of the circular rDNA plasmid. Transformants containing circular replicons were also obtained by using a similar plasmid from which the repeated promoter, but not the repeated replication origin, had been removed by BAL-31 deletion. We therefore propose that repeated rRNA promoters are deleterious in vivo in Tetrahymena, which normally lacks them. Transformants were obtained in 2-5 days compared with the 7-14 days required for transformation with unmutated rDNA plasmids by recombination. Similar results were obtained when a 550-base-pair segment containing the telomerase RNA gene of T. thermophila was inserted in the polylinker of the plasmid. We suggest that this plasmid is a useful vector system for transformation of Tetrahymena.

The Xenopus ribosomal DNA 60- and 81-base-pair repeats are position-dependent enhancers that function at the establishment of the preinitiation complex: analysis in vivo and in an enhancer-responsive in vitro system

Although it is generally believed that the 60- and 81-base-pair (60/81-bp) repeats of the Xenopus laevis ribosomal DNA (rDNA) spacer are position-independent transcriptional enhancers, this has not been shown directly. We have now developed a critical assay which proves that the 60/81-bp repeats do, in fact, stimulate transcription from promoters in cis and that they function in both orientations and when up to 1 kilobase pair from the initiation site. However, contrary to the widely accepted view, these elements are found to be highly position dependent, for they have no net effect when downstream of the initiation site within the transcribed region and they behave as transcriptional silencers of promoters in cis when moved greater than 2 kilobase pairs upstream of the initiation site. The 60/81-bp elements therefore are position-dependent 5' enhancers. We also found that this rDNA enhancer was polymerase I specific and that it was composed of duplicated, individually functional elements. Finally, we report an in vitro system that reproduces both cis enhancement and trans competition by the 60/81-bp repeats. Sequential-addition studies in this system demonstrated that the rDNA enhancer functions in trans at or before establishment of the stable transcription complex, not subsequently at each round of transcription.

Inhibition of rRNA synthesis by poliovirus: specific inactivation of transcription factors

Synthesis of rRNA by RNA polymerase I is almost completely inhibited soon after infection of human cells with poliovirus. We show that extracts prepared from poliovirus-infected HeLa cells are severely inhibited in their ability to transcribe from a human rDNA promoter compared with extracts from mock-infected cells. Two lines of evidence presented here suggest that a specific transcriptional activity required for rDNA transcription in vitro is impaired in virus-infected cells. First, fractionation of individual transcriptional components by phosphocellulose chromatography and subsequent reconstitution experiments showed that the specific transcriptional activity of fraction C (0.8 M KCl eluate) from virus-infected cells was reduced three- to fourfold relative to that isolated from mock-infected cells. The activities of other transcription factors needed for in vitro transcription from the rDNA promoter were unaffected. Second, fraction C derived from mock-infected cells specifically restored transcription in extracts prepared from virus-infected cells. Fraction C contained both a nonspecific RNA polymerase I elongation activity and a specific factor activity which was needed for accurate transcription initiation. It is the specific transcriptional activity and not the nonspecific chain elongation activity of fraction C that is affected in cells infected with poliovirus.

An RNA polymerase I promoter located in the CHO and mouse ribosomal DNA spacers: functional analysis and factor and sequence requirements

We report results of experiments in which we demonstrated the existence of a polymerase I promoter within the ribosomal DNA spacer upstream from the rRNA initiation site in Chinese hamsters and mice. Transcription of the CHO spacer promoter was achieved by the same protein factors, C and D, that catalyzed transcription of the gene promoter, and these factors bound stably to the CHO spacer promoter in a preinitiation complex, just as they did to the gene promoter. In contrast to the CHO spacer promoter, which was transcribed in vitro nearly as efficiently as the gene promoter, the mouse spacer promoter was far less active; this low activity was attributable to the fact that the mouse spacer promoter bound factor D inefficiently. It is striking that the active CHO spacer promoter violated the otherwise universal rule that metazoan RNA polymerase I promoters all have a G residue at position -16. Sequence comparisons also revealed a great similarity between the CHO and mouse spacer promoter regions, yet there was much less similarity between the flanking sequences. There was also only limited homology between the spacer and gene promoter regions, but despite this the two kinds of initiation regions were organized similarly, both consisting of an essential core promoter domain and a stimulatory domain that extended upstream to approximately residue -135. Evolutionary considerations argue strongly that the presence of ribosomal DNA spacer promoters offers a significant selective advantage.

Structural determinant of the species-specific transcription of the mouse rRNA gene promoter

Mammalian ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription has a certain species specificity such that, both in vivo and in vitro, human rDNA cannot be transcribed by mouse machinery and vice versa. This is due to a species-dependent transcription factor, TFID (Y. Mishima, I. Financsek, R. Kominami, and M. Muramatsu, Nucleic Acids Res. 10:6659-6670, 1982). On the basis of the information obtained from 5' and 3' substitution mutants, we prepared a chimeric gene in which the mouse sequence from positions -32 to -14 was inserted into the corresponding location of the human rDNA promoter. The chimeric gene could be transcribed by mouse extracts nearly as efficiently as the wild-type mouse promoter. The chimeric gene could also sequester transcription factor TFID at an efficiency similar to that for the mouse promoter. Partially purified mouse TFID that could not protect the human rDNA promoter against DNase I produced a clear footprint on this chimeric gene that was similar to that on mouse rDNA promoter. The basic structure of the mouse rDNA core promoter is discussed in relation to the interaction with TFID.

An RNA polymerase I promoter located in the CHO and mouse ribosomal DNA spacers: functional analysis and factor and sequence requirements

We report results of experiments in which we demonstrated the existence of a polymerase I promoter within the ribosomal DNA spacer upstream from the rRNA initiation site in Chinese hamsters and mice. Transcription of the CHO spacer promoter was achieved by the same protein factors, C and D, that catalyzed transcription of the gene promoter, and these factors bound stably to the CHO spacer promoter in a preinitiation complex, just as they did to the gene promoter. In contrast to the CHO spacer promoter, which was transcribed in vitro nearly as efficiently as the gene promoter, the mouse spacer promoter was far less active; this low activity was attributable to the fact that the mouse spacer promoter bound factor D inefficiently. It is striking that the active CHO spacer promoter violated the otherwise universal rule that metazoan RNA polymerase I promoters all have a G residue at position -16. Sequence comparisons also revealed a great similarity between the CHO and mouse spacer promoter regions, yet there was much less similarity between the flanking sequences. There was also only limited homology between the spacer and gene promoter regions, but despite this the two kinds of initiation regions were organized similarly, both consisting of an essential core promoter domain and a stimulatory domain that extended upstream to approximately residue -135. Evolutionary considerations argue strongly that the presence of ribosomal DNA spacer promoters offers a significant selective advantage.

Purification and characterization of a high-mobility-group-like DNA-binding protein that stimulates rRNA synthesis in vitro

A 16,000-dalton, high-mobility-group-like (HMG-like) DNA-binding protein, referred to as p16, has been purified to homogeneity from Novikoff hepatoma ascites cells. p16 binds specifically to a portion of the 5' flanking region of the rat rRNA gene (-620 to -417), which is part of the upstream activator sequence identified previously (B. G. Cassidy, H.-F. Yang-Yen, and L. I. Rothblum, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:2766-2773, 1986). p16 also binds to a segment of the external transcribed spacer (+352 to +545). In vitro reconstituted transcription experiments demonstrated that the addition of p16 stimulated rRNA synthesis up to ca. fourfold. The stimulation was dose dependent and saturable. The effect of p16 on ribosomal gene transcription was also dependent on the presence of either the upstream or the downstream DNA-binding site, or both. The amino acid composition of p16 is very similar to that of HMG-I, suggesting that p16 may be a member of the HMG-I family of proteins. In this case, our results suggest that HMG proteins may play an important role in the regulation of the rRNA gene expression.