Induction of cell cycle progression by adenovirus E1A gene 13S- and 12S-mRNA products in quiescent rat cells

Cellular proteins that are targets for transformation by DNA tumour viruses

Small DNA tumour viruses produce proteins that redirect cellular gene expression and growth control. The E1A polypeptides of adenovirus perform the functions of transcriptional activation and cellular transformation. These two functions are carried out by different domains within the E1A protein. The E1A protein associates with several cellular proteins, including the product of the retinoblastoma gene, pRb-1. Mutational analysis correlates transformation with the sites required for binding pRb and two other cellular proteins, p107 and a 300 kDa polypeptide. This correlation suggests that these proteins are targets for E1A-mediated transformation. Transforming proteins from other small DNA tumour viruses interact with pRb, raising the possibility that a common event in viral transformation is the inactivation of proteins that inhibit cellular proliferation. The role of the E1A-associated 60 kDa protein, p60, in transformation is being investigated. In the absence of E1A, p60 binds to the human homologue of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc2 gene product, p34, to form a complex that has kinase activity that oscillates during the cell cycle. Ongoing studies of the effect of adenovirus infection, and specifically E1A expression, on this cellular kinase may provide clues to how E1A overcomes cell cycle controls and transforms cells.

The role of cell signaling in poxvirus tropism: the case of the M-T5 host range protein of myxoma virus

Poxviruses demonstrate strict species specificity in vivo that range from narrow to broad, however the fundamental factors that mediate the basis of poxvirus tropism remain poorly understood. It is generally believed that most, if not all, poxviruses can efficiently bind and enter a wide range of mammalian cells and all of the known host anti-viral pathways that block viral replication in nonpremissive cells operate downstream of virus entry. A productive poxvirus infection is heavily dependent upon the production of a vast array of host modulatory products that specifically target and manipulate both extracellular immune response pathways of the host, as well as intracellular signal transduction pathways of the individually infected cells. The unique pathogenesis and host tropism of specific poxviruses can be attributed to the broad diversity of host modulatory proteins they express. Myxoma virus (MV) is a rabbit-specific poxviruses that encodes multiple host range factors, including an ankyrin-repeat protein M-T5, which functions to regulate tropism of MV for rabbit lymphocytes and some human cancer cells. At the molecular level, M-T5 binds and alters at least two distinct cellular proteins: Akt and cullin-1. The direct interaction between M-T5 and Akt was shown to be a key restriction determinant for MV tropism in a spectrum of human cancer cells making MV an excellent oncolytic candidate. Thus, the intricate relationship between viral encoded proteins and components of the host cell signaling networks can have profound impact on poxvirus tropism. The lessons we continue to learn from poxvirus host range factors like M-T5 will provide further insights into the factors that regulate poxvirus tropism and the mechanisms by which poxviruses micromanipulate the signaling pathways of the infected cell.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor is required for p300-mediated induction of DNA synthesis by adenovirus E1A

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates the biological responses to environmental contaminants such as 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Embryonic fibroblast (EF) isolated from AHR-null mice exhibited slow cell growth compared with wild-type EF. Reintroduction of AHR into AHR-null EF increased cell growth, suggesting that AHR is involved in cell cycle control. The role of the AHR in cell cycle control was examined using the adenovirus oncoprotein E1A. EF, derived from wild-type and AHR-null mice, were transfected with two mutant E1A expression plasmids that inactivate either p300/CBP or retinoblastoma protein (pRb). Although DNA synthesis of wild-type EF was induced by both E1A mutants, DNA synthesis in the AHR-null EF was induced only by the mutant that binds pRb, not by the mutant to p300/CBP. These data show that both pRb and p300/CBP were the target of E1A-induced DNA synthesis in wild-type EF. In AHR-null mice, however, only pRb was the target of E1A-induced DNA synthesis and p300/CBP cannot be inactivated by E1A in the absence of AHR. Immunoprecipitation revealed that AHR directly bound to p300, thus suggesting the intriguing possibility that AHR is involved in control of the cell cycle via interaction with p300.

Induction of susceptibility to tumor necrosis factor by E1A is dependent on binding to either p300 or p105-Rb and induction of DNA synthesis

The introduction of the adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) gene products into normal cells sensitizes these cells to the cytotoxic effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Previous studies have shown that the region of E1A responsible for susceptibility is CR1, a conserved region within E1A which binds the cellular proteins p300 and p105-Rb at nonoverlapping sites. Binding of these and other cellular proteins by E1A results in the induction of E1A-associated activities such as transformation, immortalization, DNA synthesis, and apoptosis. To investigate the mechanism by which E1A induces susceptibility to TNF, the NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cell line was infected with viruses containing mutations within E1A which abrogate binding of some or all of the cellular proteins to E1A. The results show that TNF susceptibility is induced by E1A binding to either p300 or p105-Rb. E1A mutants that bind neither p300 nor p105-Rb do not induce susceptibility to TNF. Experiments with stable cell lines created by transfection with either wild-type or mutant E1A lead to these same conclusions. In addition, a correlation between induction of DNA synthesis and induction of TNF sensitivity is seen. Only viruses which induce DNA synthesis can induce TNF sensitivity. Those viruses which do not induce DNA synthesis also do not induce TNF sensitivity. These data suggest that the mechanisms underlying induction of susceptibility to TNF by E1A are intimately connected to E1A's capacity to override cell cycle controls.

Functional importance of complex formation between the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor family and adenovirus E1A proteins as determined by mutational analysis of E1A conserved region 2

Adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) products induce DNA synthesis, transform primary rodent cells, and activate transcription factor E2F through complex formation with an array of cellular proteins via the E1A amino terminus and conserved regions 1 and 2 (CR1 and CR2). Interactions with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor, pRb, and related proteins p107 and p130 rely somewhat on CR1 but largely on CR2, which contains a core binding sequence Leu-122-X-Cys-X-Glu. We introduced point mutations in CR2 to define such interactions more precisely. In human cells, alteration of any of the conserved residues within the binding core eliminated complex formation with pRb. Conversion of nonconserved Thr-123 to Pro (but not to either Ala or Ser) disrupted binding of pRb, presumably because of conformational changes in the binding core. No single E1A point mutant was completely defective in binding p107, suggesting that molecular interactions between E1A proteins and p107 clearly differ from those with pRb and p130. In general, the patterns of complex formation by E1A mutants in rat, monkey, and human cells were quite similar. All mutants which failed to bind significant amounts of pRb also failed to transform primary rat cells. Several mutants demonstrated selective binding to pRb, p107, and p130, but transforming activity corresponded largely with complex formation with pRb, regardless of the levels of interactions with p107 and p130. Mutants defective for binding of both pRb and p107 failed to induce the activity of transcription factor E2F; however, quite high levels were activated by E1A mutants that interacted with p107 alone. These results suggested that both pRb and p107 are important regulators of E2F activity but that complex formation with and activation of E2F by p107 are insufficient for cell transformation.

Mechanism of induction of cellular DNA synthesis by the adenovirus E1A 12S cDNA product

The mechanism of induction of DNA synthesis in quiescent rat 3Y1 cells by the adenovirus E1A gene was investigated using the 3Y1 derivative cell lines g12-21, gn12RB1, and gn12RB2. The g12-21 cells express the E1A 12S cDNA and the latter two cells express both the E1A 12S cDNA and the human retinoblastoma susceptibility (Rb) gene at different levels in response to dexamethasone (dex). The cDNA sequences of E1A-inducible cell cycle-dependent genes, clone 3 and clone 16, were isolated by differential screening of a cDNA library constructed from dex-treated g12-21 cells. The quiescent 3Y1 cells induced c-fos and c-myc expression within 2 h after serum stimulation and expressed clone 16 and clone 3 transiently at around 8 h before the onset of DNA synthesis (10 h). In contrast, the quiescent g12-21 cells treated with dex expressed a high level of E1A at 6 to 8 h after treatment and expressed clone 16 and clone 3 at around 8 h without stimulation of c-fos and c-myc expression, suggesting that E1A bypasses the cell cycle early in G1. The half-maximal rate of DNA synthesis was reached in a much shorter time in dex-treated g12-21 cells (12 h) than in serum-treated 3Y1 cells (18 h), suggesting that E1A also bypasses the cell cycle at the G1/S boundary. The gn12RB1 and gn12RB2 cells were unable to induce DNA synthesis in response to dex presumably due to lower levels of E1A expression, although gn12RB2 but not gn12RB1 cells could express clone 16 and clone 3. These results suggest that the level of E1A required for bypass at the G1/S boundary is higher than that required early in G1.

Inhibition of DNA replication of adenovirus type 5 and simian virus 40 by tunicamycin

Addition of tunicamycin, a glycosylation inhibitor, to SV40-infected CV-1 cells or Ad5-infected HeLa cells at the beginning of infection was found to inhibit the accumulation of viral DNA at late times after infection. However, tunicamycin did not block viral DNA replication when added to the infected cells at late times after infection. The inhibitory effect of tunicamycin was partially reversible in the presence of acetylglucosamine, suggesting that the effect was due to glycosylation. In spite of diminished amounts of viral DNA accumulated at the late phase of infection in the presence of tunicamycin, the transcription rate of Ad5 late RNA and the amount of adenovirus late proteins and mRNA were not significantly affected by tunicamycin treatment. The inhibitory effect of tunicamycin on Ad5 DNA replication was much reduced in 293 cells which provide E1a gene products in trans. Similar observation was obtained for the replication of SV40 DNA in Cos-7 cells which provide SV40 early gene products in trans. These results suggest that tunicamycin inhibits a glycosylation event induced by the early gene products of Ad5 and SV40 viruses during the early phase of infection.

Molecular cloning and characterization of cellular genes whose expression is repressed by the adenovirus E1a gene products and growth factors in quiescent rat cells

Several cDNA clones of cellular genes, whose expression is repressed by the adenovirus type-12 E1a gene products, were isolated from a rat 3Y1 cell cDNA library by differential plaque hybridization with labeled cDNA probes prepared from 3Y1 and the derivative cell line expressing the E1a gene constitutively. The changes in the levels of these gene transcripts during cell-cycle progression from G0 to G1 to S phase were analyzed with 3Y1 cells and gMA cell lines, derived from 3Y1 cells, in which the expression of the E1a gene or its 13S, 12S cDNA can be switched on by the addition of dexamethasone. Quantitation of the transcripts by Northern-blot hybridizations and by nuclear run-on experiments revealed the following. (i) The level of clone-53 mRNA (which turned out to be the fibronectin (FN)-coding mRNA) is very high in resting gMA cells and decreased rapidly after switching on of the E1a gene or its 13S, or 12S cDNA. (ii) The addition of serum or platelet-derived growth factor to resting 3Y1 cells also resulted in a rapid decrease in the FN mRNA level, but the addition of epidermal growth factor (EGF) had little or no effect. (iii) The level of clone-56 mRNA in gMA cells was not affected by the induction of the E1a gene expression; however, the addition of EGF to resting gMA or 3Y1 cells resulted in a decrease of this mRNA after a 12- to 16-h lag period. Induction of the E1a gene expression in gMA cells treated with EGF shortened the lag period. The addition of serum to resting 3Y1 cells decreased the clone-56 mRNA level without a significant lag period.