Silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes are tightly clustered in the silkworm genome

The properties of a tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Drosophila melanogaster support an evolutionary link between pre-mRNA editing and tRNA modification

Pre-mRNA editing involving the conversion of adenosine to inosine is mediated by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADAR1 and ADAR2). ADARs contain multiple double-stranded RNA(dsRNA)-binding domains in addition to an adenosine deaminase domain. An adenosine deaminase acting on tRNAs, scTad1p (also known as scADAT1), cloned from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a deaminase domain related to the ADARs but lacks dsRNA-binding domains. We have identified a gene homologous to scADAT1 in the region of Drosophila melanogaster Adh chromosome II. Recombinant Drosophila ADAT1 (dADAT1) has been expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris and purified. The enzyme has no activity on dsRNA substrates but is a tRNA deaminase with specificity for adenosine 37 of insect alanine tRNA. dADAT1 shows greater similarity to vertebrate ADARs than to yeast Tad1p, supporting the hypothesis of a common evolutionary origin for ADARs and ADATs. dAdat1 transcripts are maternally supplied in the egg. Zygotic expression is widespread initially and later concentrates in the central nervous system.

Silkworm TFIIIB binds both constitutive and silk gland-specific tRNA Ala promoters but protects only the constitutive promoter from DNase I cleavage

We have identified a complex between TFIIIB and the upstream promoter of silkworm tRNA Ala genes that is detectable by gel retardation and DNase I footprinting. Formation of this complex depends on the integrity of previously identified upstream promoter elements and on the presence of other silkworm transcription factors, either TFIIID or a fraction that contains both TFIIIC and TFIIID. We have used this complex to compare the interactions of TFIIIB with two kinds of tRNA Ala genes whose different in vitro transcription properties are conferred by the upstream segments of their promoters. These are the tRNA C Ala genes, which are transcribed constitutively, and the tRNA SG Ala genes, which are transcribed only in the silk gland. We find that TFIIIB binds tRNA SG Ala genes with lower affinity than it binds tRNA C Ala genes. In addition, the TFIIIB complex formed on tRNA SG Ala genes differ qualitatively from those formed on tRNA C Ala genes. Both the transcriptional activity of tRNA SG Ala complexes and the ability of the complexes to protect upstream DNA from DNase I digestion are reduced.

TFIIIR is an isoleucine tRNA

Promoter-specific transcription by silkworm RNA polymerase III is dependent on several transcription factors (TFs) in addition to the polymerase itself. The activities present in silk gland nuclear extracts that are necessary to reconstitute transcription from class III genes in vitro have been resolved into several partially purified components. These include TFIIIR, which is unusual because it is composed of RNA. Here, we identify the RNA that provides TFIIIR activity as silkworm tRNA(IleIAU). This conclusion is based on copurification of tRNA(IleIAU) with TFIIIR activity, TFIIIR activity in synthetic tRNA(Ile), and hybrid selection of TFIIIR activity by antisense tRNA(IleIAU). We have tested the ability of a variety of other tRNAs to stimulate transcription and find that TFIIIR activity is highly specific to silkworm tRNA(IleIAU).

TFIIIR is an isoleucine tRNA

Promoter-specific transcription by silkworm RNA polymerase III is dependent on several transcription factors (TFs) in addition to the polymerase itself. The activities present in silk gland nuclear extracts that are necessary to reconstitute transcription from class III genes in vitro have been resolved into several partially purified components. These include TFIIIR, which is unusual because it is composed of RNA. Here, we identify the RNA that provides TFIIIR activity as silkworm tRNA(IleIAU). This conclusion is based on copurification of tRNA(IleIAU) with TFIIIR activity, TFIIIR activity in synthetic tRNA(Ile), and hybrid selection of TFIIIR activity by antisense tRNA(IleIAU). We have tested the ability of a variety of other tRNAs to stimulate transcription and find that TFIIIR activity is highly specific to silkworm tRNA(IleIAU).

Silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes interact more weakly than constitutive tRNA(Ala) genes with silkworm TFIIIB and polymerase III fractions

Constitutive and silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes from silkworms have very different transcriptional properties in vitro. Typically, the constitutive type, which encodes tRNA(AlaC), directs transcription much more efficiently than does the silk gland-specific type, which encodes tRNA(AlaSG). We think that the inefficiency of the tRNA(AlaCG) gene underlies its capacity to be turned off in non-silk gland cells. An economical model is that the tRNA(AlaSG) promoter interacts poorly, relative to the tRNA(AlaC) promoter, with one or more components of the basal transcription machinery. As a consequence, the tRNA(AlaSG) gene directs the formation of fewer transcription complexes or of complexes with reduced cycling ability. Here we show that the difference in the number of active transcription complexes accounts for the difference in tRNA(AlaC) and tRNA(AlaSG) transcription rates. To determine whether a particular component of the silkworm transcription machinery is responsible for reduced complex formation on the tRNA(AlaSG) gene, we measured competition by templates for defined fractions of this machinery. We find that the tRNA(AlaSG) gene is greatly impaired, in comparison with the tRNA(AlaC) gene, in competition for either TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III. Competition for each of these fractions is also strongly influenced by the nature of the 5' flanking sequence, the promoter element responsible for the distinctive transcriptional properties of tRNA(AlaSG) and tRNA(AlaC) genes. These results suggest that differential interaction with TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III is a critical functional distinction between these genes.

Silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes interact more weakly than constitutive tRNA(Ala) genes with silkworm TFIIIB and polymerase III fractions

Constitutive and silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes from silkworms have very different transcriptional properties in vitro. Typically, the constitutive type, which encodes tRNA(AlaC), directs transcription much more efficiently than does the silk gland-specific type, which encodes tRNA(AlaSG). We think that the inefficiency of the tRNA(AlaCG) gene underlies its capacity to be turned off in non-silk gland cells. An economical model is that the tRNA(AlaSG) promoter interacts poorly, relative to the tRNA(AlaC) promoter, with one or more components of the basal transcription machinery. As a consequence, the tRNA(AlaSG) gene directs the formation of fewer transcription complexes or of complexes with reduced cycling ability. Here we show that the difference in the number of active transcription complexes accounts for the difference in tRNA(AlaC) and tRNA(AlaSG) transcription rates. To determine whether a particular component of the silkworm transcription machinery is responsible for reduced complex formation on the tRNA(AlaSG) gene, we measured competition by templates for defined fractions of this machinery. We find that the tRNA(AlaSG) gene is greatly impaired, in comparison with the tRNA(AlaC) gene, in competition for either TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III. Competition for each of these fractions is also strongly influenced by the nature of the 5' flanking sequence, the promoter element responsible for the distinctive transcriptional properties of tRNA(AlaSG) and tRNA(AlaC) genes. These results suggest that differential interaction with TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III is a critical functional distinction between these genes.