Role for DNA replication in beta-globin gene activation

A promoter DNA demethylation landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation

Global mechanisms defining the gene expression programs specific for hematopoiesis are still not fully understood. Here, we show that promoter DNA demethylation is associated with the activation of hematopoietic-specific genes. Using genome-wide promoter methylation arrays, we identified 694 hematopoietic-specific genes repressed by promoter DNA methylation in human embryonic stem cells and whose loss of methylation in hematopoietic can be associated with gene expression. The association between promoter methylation and gene expression was studied for many hematopoietic-specific genes including CD45, CD34, CD28, CD19, the T cell receptor (TCR), the MHC class II gene HLA-DR, perforin 1 and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and results indicated that DNA demethylation was not always sufficient for gene activation. Promoter demethylation occurred either early during embryonic development or later on during hematopoietic differentiation. Analysis of the genome-wide promoter methylation status of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated from somatic CD34⁺ HSPCs and differentiated derivatives from CD34⁺ HSPCs confirmed the role of DNA methylation in regulating the expression of genes of the hemato-immune system, and indicated that promoter methylation of these genes may be associated to stemness. Together, these data suggest that promoter DNA demethylation might play a role in the tissue/cell-specific genome-wide gene regulation within the hematopoietic compartment.

Activation domains of transcription factors mediate replication dependent transcription from a minimal HIV-1 promoter

Transcription from a minimal HIV-1 promoter containing the three Sp1 binding sites and TATA box can be activated without Tat by template DNA replication. Here we show that this activation can also be mediated by recombinant GAL4 fusion proteins containing the activation domains of Sp1, VP16 or CTF (or by full-length GAL4) targeted to the HIV-1 promoter by replacing the Sp1 sites with five GAL4 binding sites. Thus Sp1 is not unique in its ability to mediate replication activated transcription, although the degree of processivity elicited by the different activators varied significantly from strongly processive (GAL4-VP16) to relatively non-processive (GAL4-Sp1 or -CTF). Processive GAL4-VP16-activated transcription, but not efficient initiation, required multiple GAL4 binding sites. In the presence of Tat, transcription with GAL4-SP1 and GAL4-CTF was further activated (principally at the level of processivity) but GAL4-VP16-potentiated transcription was only slightly stimulated. The Tat-dependent switch from non-processive to fully processive transcription was particularly marked for GAL4-Sp1, an effect which may be relevant to the selection of Sp1 binding sites by the HIV-1 promoter.

Activation of the silent progesterone receptor gene by ectopic expression of estrogen receptors in a rat fibroblast cell line

We describe the construction and characterization of a novel estrogen (E2)-responsive cell line, Rat1+ER, which ectopically expresses estrogen receptor (ER). Human ER cDNA was introduced by retrovirus-mediated gene transfer into the Rat1 cell line, which does not express functional ER endogenously. Rat1+ER cells express functional ER based on radioreceptor assays, immunoblotting, and transient transfection experiments using E2-responsive reporter plasmids. The effects of this ectopic ER expression were studied on three endogenous E2-responsive genes, prolactin (PRL), progesterone receptor (PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). PRL, usually expressed in the lactotrophs of the pituitary, is not expressed at all in Rat1+ER cells, with or without E2 addition, and appears to require other factors for expression. In contrast, although PR is not expressed in Rat1 cells, it is induced in Rat1+ER cells upon the addition of E2. This induction appears to occur at the transcriptional level and is insensitive to cycloheximide treatment. This is one of the few examples where the expression of one gene activates an otherwise silent gene. Another contrasting observation is that, although EGFR is basally expressed in Rat1+ER cells, the addition of E2 has no effect. Our studies paint a complicated picture of E2 regulation of endogenous genes: the activation of the PR gene may only require the presence of E2 and ER, whereas EGFR and PRL genes require factors in addition to ER for basal as well as E2-regulated expression.

Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism

The increasingly detailed biochemical definition of the protein complexes that regulate gene transcription has led to the re-emergence of questions about the role of histones. Much recent evidence suggests that transcriptional activation requires that transcription factors successfully compete with histones for binding to promoters, and that there may be more than one mechanism by which this is achieved.

The structure and assembly of active chromatin

Much effort has been expended towards understanding the details of how nucleosomes are established on newly replicated DNA. More recently it has begun to be possible to study the binding of both trans-acting factors and histones to DNA. This review is concerned with an assessment of the current status of this work. In addition, we discuss some of the questions that still need to be addressed in order to understand how trans-acting factors can establish extensive interactions with the DNA of active genes while they are excluded from inactive genes.

The nucleoskeleton and the topology of transcription

Transcription is conventionally believed to occur by passage of a mobile polymerase along a fixed template. Evidence for this model is derived almost entirely from material prepared using hypotonic salt concentrations. Studies on subnuclear structures isolated using hypertonic conditions, and more recently using conditions closer to the physiological, suggest an alternative. Transcription occurs as the template moves past a polymerase attached to a nucleoskeleton; this skeleton is the active site of transcription. Evidence for the two models is summarised. Much of it is consistent with the polymerase being attached and not freely diffusible. Some consequences of such a model are discussed.