Laboratory Evolution Experiments Help Identify a Predominant Region of Constitutive Stable DNA Replication Initiation

Pathological R-loops in bacteria from engineered expression of endogenous antisense RNAs whose synthesis is ordinarily terminated by Rho

In many bacteria, the essential factors Rho and NusG mediate termination of synthesis of nascent transcripts (including antisense RNAs) that are not being simultaneously translated. It has been proposed that in Rho's absence toxic RNA-DNA hybrids (R-loops) may be generated from nascent untranslated transcripts, and genome-wide mapping studies in Escherichia coli have identified putative loci of R-loop formation from more than 100 endogenous antisense transcripts that are synthesized only in a Rho-deficient strain. Here we provide evidence that engineered expression in wild-type E. coli of several such individual antisense regions on a plasmid or the chromosome generates R-loops that, in an RNase H-modulated manner, serve to disrupt genome integrity. Rho inhibition was associated with increased prevalence of antisense R-loops also in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and Caulobacter crescentus. Our results confirm the essential role of Rho in several bacterial genera for prevention of toxic R-loops from pervasive yet cryptic endogenous antisense transcripts. Engineered antisense R-looped regions may be useful for studies on both site-specific impediments to bacterial chromosomal replication and the mechanisms of their resolution.

Hunting the Cell Cycle Snark

In this very personal hunt for the meaning of the bacterial cell cycle, the snark, I briefly revisit and update some of the mechanisms we and many others have proposed to regulate the bacterial cell cycle. These mechanisms, which include the dynamics of calcium, membranes, hyperstructures, and networks, are based on physical and physico-chemical concepts such as ion condensation, phase transition, crowding, liquid crystal immiscibility, collective vibrational modes, reptation, and water availability. I draw on ideas from subjects such as the 'prebiotic ecology' and phenotypic diversity to help with the hunt. Given the fundamental nature of the snark, I would expect that its capture would make sense of other parts of biology. The route, therefore, followed by the hunt has involved trying to answer questions like "why do cells replicate their DNA?", "why is DNA replication semi-conservative?", "why is DNA a double helix?", "why do cells divide?", "is cell division a spandrel?", and "how are catabolism and anabolism balanced?". Here, I propose some relatively unexplored, experimental approaches to testing snark-related hypotheses and, finally, I propose some possibly original ideas about DNA packing, about phase separations, and about computing with populations of virtual bacteria.

Open Questions about the Roles of DnaA, Related Proteins, and Hyperstructure Dynamics in the Cell Cycle

The DnaA protein has long been considered to play the key role in the initiation of chromosome replication in modern bacteria. Many questions about this role, however, remain unanswered. Here, we raise these questions within a framework based on the dynamics of hyperstructures, alias large assemblies of molecules and macromolecules that perform a function. In these dynamics, hyperstructures can (1) emit and receive signals or (2) fuse and separate from one another. We ask whether the DnaA-based initiation hyperstructure acts as a logic gate receiving information from the membrane, the chromosome, and metabolism to trigger replication; we try to phrase some of these questions in terms of DNA supercoiling, strand opening, glycolytic enzymes, SeqA, ribonucleotide reductase, the macromolecular synthesis operon, post-translational modifications, and metabolic pools. Finally, we ask whether, underpinning the regulation of the cell cycle, there is a physico-chemical clock inherited from the first protocells, and whether this clock emits a single signal that triggers both chromosome replication and cell division.

Characterization of a pathway of genomic instability induced by R-loops and its regulation by topoisomerases in E. coli

The prototype enzymes of the ubiquitous type IA topoisomerases (topos) family are Escherichia coli topo I (topA) and topo III (topB). Topo I shows preference for relaxation of negative supercoiling and topo III for decatenation. However, as they could act as backups for each other or even share functions, strains lacking both enzymes must be used to reveal the roles of type IA enzymes in genome maintenance. Recently, marker frequency analysis (MFA) of genomic DNA from topA topB null mutants revealed a major RNase HI-sensitive DNA peak bordered by Ter/Tus barriers, sites of replication fork fusion and termination in the chromosome terminus region (Ter). Here, flow cytometry for R-loop-dependent replication (RLDR), MFA, R-loop detection with S9.6 antibodies, and microscopy were used to further characterize the mechanism and consequences of over-replication in Ter. It is shown that the Ter peak is not due to the presence of a strong origin for RLDR in Ter region; instead RLDR, which is partly inhibited by the backtracking-resistant rpoB*35 mutation, appears to contribute indirectly to Ter over-replication. The data suggest that RLDR from multiple sites on the chromosome increases the number of replication forks trapped at Ter/Tus barriers which leads to RecA-dependent DNA amplification in Ter and to a chromosome segregation defect. Overproducing topo IV, the main cellular decatenase, does not inhibit RLDR or Ter over-replication but corrects the chromosome segregation defect. Furthermore, our data suggest that the inhibition of RLDR by topo I does not require its C-terminal-mediated interaction with RNA polymerase. Overall, our data reveal a pathway of genomic instability triggered by R-loops and its regulation by various topos activities at different steps.

Role for DNA double strand end-resection activity of RecBCD in control of aberrant chromosomal replication initiation in Escherichia coli

Replication of the circular bacterial chromosome is initiated from a locus oriC with the aid of an essential protein DnaA. One approach to identify factors acting to prevent aberrant oriC-independent replication initiation in Escherichia coli has been that to obtain mutants which survive loss of DnaA. Here, we show that a ΔrecD mutation, associated with attenuation of RecBCD’s DNA double strand end-resection activity, provokes abnormal replication and rescues ΔdnaA lethality in two situations: (i) in absence of 5′-3′ single-strand DNA exonuclease RecJ, or (ii) when multiple two-ended DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are generated either by I-SceI endonucleolytic cleavages or by radiomimetic agents phleomycin or bleomycin. One-ended DSBs in the ΔrecD mutant did not rescue ΔdnaA lethality. With two-ended DSBs in the ΔrecD strain, ΔdnaA viability was retained even after linearization of the chromosome. Data from genome-wide DNA copy number determinations in ΔdnaA-rescued cells lead us to propose a model that nuclease-mediated DNA resection activity of RecBCD is critical for prevention of a σ-mode of rolling-circle over-replication when convergent replication forks merge and fuse, as may be expected to occur during normal replication at the chromosomal terminus region or during repair of two-ended DSBs following ‘ends-in’ replication.

A large chromosomal inversion affects antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli to sodium deoxycholate

Resistance to antimicrobials is normally caused by mutations in the drug targets or genes involved in antimicrobial activation or expulsion. Here we show that an Escherichia coli strain, named DOC14, selected for increased resistance to the bile salt sodium deoxycholate, has no mutations in any ORF, but instead has a 2.1 Mb chromosomal inversion. The breakpoints of the inversion are two inverted copies of an IS5 element. Besides lowering deoxycholate susceptibility, the IS5-mediated chromosomal inversion in the DOC14 mutant was found to increase bacterial survival upon exposure to ampicillin and vancomycin, and sensitize the cell to ciprofloxacin and meropenem, but does not affect bacterial growth or cell morphology in a rich medium in the absence of antibacterial molecules. Overall, our findings support the notion that a large chromosomal inversion can benefit bacterial cells under certain conditions, contributing to genetic variability available for selection during evolution. The DOC14 mutant paired with its isogenic parental strain form a useful model as bacterial ancestors in evolution experiments to study how a large chromosomal inversion influences the evolutionary trajectory in response to various environmental stressors.

Replication-Dependent Organization Constrains Positioning of Long DNA Repeats in Bacterial Genomes

Bacterial genome organization is primarily driven by chromosomal replication from a single origin of replication. However, chromosomal rearrangements, which can disrupt such organization, are inevitable in nature. Long DNA repeats are major players mediating rearrangements, large and small, via homologous recombination. Since changes to genome organization affect bacterial fitness-and more so in fast-growing than slow-growing bacteria-and are under selection, it is reasonable to expect that genomic positioning of long DNA repeats is also under selection. To test this, we identified identical DNA repeats of at least 100 base pairs across ∼6,000 bacterial genomes and compared their distribution in fast- and slow-growing bacteria. We found that long identical DNA repeats are distributed in a non-random manner across bacterial genomes. Their distribution differs in the overall number, orientation, and proximity to the origin of replication, between fast- and slow-growing bacteria. We show that their positioning-which might arise from a combination of the processes that produce repeats and selection on rearrangements that recombination between repeat elements might cause-permits less disruption to the replication-dependent genome organization of bacteria compared with random suggesting it as a major constraint to positioning of long DNA repeats.

Too Much of a Good Thing: How Ectopic DNA Replication Affects Bacterial Replication Dynamics

Each cell division requires the complete and accurate duplication of the entire genome. In bacteria, the duplication process of the often-circular chromosomes is initiated at a single origin per chromosome, resulting in two replication forks that traverse the chromosome in opposite directions. DNA synthesis is completed once the two forks fuse in a region diametrically opposite the origin. In some bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, the region where forks fuse forms a specialized termination area. Polar replication fork pause sites flanking this area can pause the progression of replication forks, thereby allowing forks to enter but not to leave. Transcription of all required genes has to take place simultaneously with genome duplication. As both of these genome trafficking processes share the same template, conflicts are unavoidable. In this review, we focus on recent attempts to add additional origins into various ectopic chromosomal locations of the E. coli chromosome. As ectopic origins disturb the native replichore arrangements, the problems resulting from such perturbations can give important insights into how genome trafficking processes are coordinated and the problems that arise if this coordination is disturbed. The data from these studies highlight that head-on replication–transcription conflicts are indeed highly problematic and multiple repair pathways are required to restart replication forks arrested at obstacles. In addition, the existing data also demonstrate that the replication fork trap in E. coli imposes significant constraints to genome duplication if ectopic origins are active. We describe the current models of how replication fork fusion events can cause serious problems for genome duplication, as well as models of how such problems might be alleviated both by a number of repair pathways as well as the replication fork trap system. Considering the problems associated both with head-on replication-transcription conflicts as well as head-on replication fork fusion events might provide clues of how these genome trafficking issues have contributed to shape the distinct architecture of bacterial chromosomes.