1
|
Wang Y, Sun X, Peng J, Li F, Ali F, Wang Z. Regulation of seed germination: ROS, epigenetic, and hormonal aspects. J Adv Res 2024:S2090-1232(24)00225-X. [PMID: 38838783 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The whole life of a plant is regulated by complex environmental or hormonal signaling networks that control genomic stability, environmental signal transduction, and gene expression affecting plant development and viability. Seed germination, responsible for the transformation from seed to seedling, is a key initiation step in plant growth and is controlled by unique physiological and biochemical processes. It is continuously modulated by various factors including epigenetic modifications, hormone transport, ROS signaling, and interaction among them. ROS showed versatile crucial functions in seed germination including various physiological oxidations to nucleic acid, protein, lipid, or chromatin in the cytoplasm, cell wall, and nucleus. AIM of review: This review intends to provide novel insights into underlying mechanisms of seed germination especially associated with the ROS, and considers how these versatile regulatory mechanisms can be developed as useful tools for crop improvement. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW We have summarized the generation and elimination of ROS during seed germination, with a specific focus on uncovering and understanding the mechanisms of seed germination at the level of phytohormones, ROS, and epigenetic switches, as well as the close connections between them. The findings exhibit that ROS plays multiple roles in regulating the ethylene, ABA, and GA homeostasis as well as the Ca2+ signaling, NO signaling, and MAPK cascade in seed germination via either the signal trigger or the oxidative modifier agent. Further, ROS shows the potential in the nuclear genome remodeling and some epigenetic modifiers function, although the detailed mechanisms are unclear in seed germination. We propose that ROS functions as a hub in the complex network regulating seed germination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakong Wang
- Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China
| | - Xiangyang Sun
- Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Jun Peng
- National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, Hainan, China; State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China
| | - Fuguang Li
- Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, Hainan, China
| | - Faiza Ali
- Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
| | - Zhi Wang
- Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, Hainan, China; State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio‑breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smolikova G, Strygina K, Krylova E, Leonova T, Frolov A, Khlestkina E, Medvedev S. Transition from Seeds to Seedlings: Hormonal and Epigenetic Aspects. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 10:1884. [PMID: 34579418 PMCID: PMC8467299 DOI: 10.3390/plants10091884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Transition from seed to seedling is one of the critical developmental steps, dramatically affecting plant growth and viability. Before plants enter the vegetative phase of their ontogenesis, massive rearrangements of signaling pathways and switching of gene expression programs are required. This results in suppression of the genes controlling seed maturation and activation of those involved in regulation of vegetative growth. At the level of hormonal regulation, these events are controlled by the balance of abscisic acid and gibberellins, although ethylene, auxins, brassinosteroids, cytokinins, and jasmonates are also involved. The key players include the members of the LAFL network-the transcription factors LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and 2 (LEC 1 and 2), ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3), and FUSCA3 (FUS3), as well as DELAY OF GERMINATION1 (DOG1). They are the negative regulators of seed germination and need to be suppressed before seedling development can be initiated. This repressive signal is mediated by chromatin remodeling complexes-POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2), as well as PICKLE (PKL) and PICKLE-RELATED2 (PKR2) proteins. Finally, epigenetic methylation of cytosine residues in DNA, histone post-translational modifications, and post-transcriptional downregulation of seed maturation genes with miRNA are discussed. Here, we summarize recent updates in the study of hormonal and epigenetic switches involved in regulation of the transition from seed germination to the post-germination stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galina Smolikova
- Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Ksenia Strygina
- Postgenomic Studies Laboratory, Federal Research Center N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, 190121 St. Petersburg, Russia; (K.S.); (E.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Ekaterina Krylova
- Postgenomic Studies Laboratory, Federal Research Center N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, 190121 St. Petersburg, Russia; (K.S.); (E.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Tatiana Leonova
- Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany; (T.L.); (A.F.)
- Department of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Andrej Frolov
- Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany; (T.L.); (A.F.)
- Department of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Elena Khlestkina
- Postgenomic Studies Laboratory, Federal Research Center N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, 190121 St. Petersburg, Russia; (K.S.); (E.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Sergei Medvedev
- Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smolikova G, Leonova T, Vashurina N, Frolov A, Medvedev S. Desiccation Tolerance as the Basis of Long-Term Seed Viability. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 22:E101. [PMID: 33374189 PMCID: PMC7795748 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Desiccation tolerance appeared as the key adaptation feature of photoautotrophic organisms for survival in terrestrial habitats. During the further evolution, vascular plants developed complex anatomy structures and molecular mechanisms to maintain the hydrated state of cell environment and sustain dehydration. However, the role of the genes encoding the mechanisms behind this adaptive feature of terrestrial plants changed with their evolution. Thus, in higher vascular plants it is restricted to protection of spores, seeds and pollen from dehydration, whereas the mature vegetative stages became sensitive to desiccation. During maturation, orthodox seeds lose up to 95% of water and successfully enter dormancy. This feature allows seeds maintaining their viability even under strongly fluctuating environmental conditions. The mechanisms behind the desiccation tolerance are activated at the late seed maturation stage and are associated with the accumulation of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, small heat shock proteins (sHSP), non-reducing oligosaccharides, and antioxidants of different chemical nature. The main regulators of maturation and desiccation tolerance are abscisic acid and protein DOG1, which control the network of transcription factors, represented by LEC1, LEC2, FUS3, ABI3, ABI5, AGL67, PLATZ1, PLATZ2. This network is complemented by epigenetic regulation of gene expression via methylation of DNA, post-translational modifications of histones and chromatin remodeling. These fine regulatory mechanisms allow orthodox seeds maintaining desiccation tolerance during the whole period of germination up to the stage of radicle protrusion. This time point, in which seeds lose desiccation tolerance, is critical for the whole process of seed development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galina Smolikova
- Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Tatiana Leonova
- Department of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199004 St. Petersburg, Russia; (T.L.); (N.V.); (A.F.)
- Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Natalia Vashurina
- Department of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199004 St. Petersburg, Russia; (T.L.); (N.V.); (A.F.)
| | - Andrej Frolov
- Department of Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199004 St. Petersburg, Russia; (T.L.); (N.V.); (A.F.)
- Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Sergei Medvedev
- Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Tikhodeyev ON. Heredity determined by the environment: Lamarckian ideas in modern molecular biology. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 710:135521. [PMID: 31784162 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Inheritance of acquired characteristics (IAC) is a well-documented phenomenon occurring both in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, it is not included in current biological theories, and the risks of IAC induction are not assessed by genetic toxicology. Furthermore, different kinds of IAC (transgenerational and intergenerational inheritance, genotrophic changes, dauermodifications, vernalization, and some others) are traditionally considered in isolation, thus impeding the development of a comprehensive view on IAC as a whole. Herein, we discuss all currently known kinds of IAC as well as their mechanisms, if unraveled. We demonstrate that IAC is a special case of genotype × environment interactions requiring certain genotypes and, as a rule, prolonged exposure to the inducing influence. Most mechanisms of IAC are epigenetic; these include but not limited to DNA methylation, histone modifications, competition of transcription factors, induction of non-coding RNAs, inhibition of plastid translation, and curing of amyloid and non-amyloid prions. In some cases, changes in DNA sequences or host-microbe interactions are involved as well. The only principal difference between IAC and other environmentally inducible hereditary changes such as the effects of radiation is the origin of the changes: in case of IAC they are definite (determined by the environment), while the others are indefinite (arise from environmentally provoked molecular stochasticity). At least some kinds of IAC are adaptive and could be regarded as the elements of natural selection, though non-canonical in their origin and molecular nature. This is a probable way towards synthesis of the Lamarckian and Darwinian evolutionary conceptions. Applied issues of IAC are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg N Tikhodeyev
- Department of Genetics & Biotechnology, Saint-Petersburg State University, University emb. 7/9, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
R. M. SK, Wang Y, Zhang X, Cheng H, Sun L, He S, Hao F. Redox Components: Key Regulators of Epigenetic Modifications in Plants. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21041419. [PMID: 32093110 PMCID: PMC7073030 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling are crucial regulators of chromatin architecture and gene expression in plants. Their dynamics are significantly influenced by oxidants, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO), and antioxidants, like pyridine nucleotides and glutathione in plants. These redox intermediates regulate the activities and expression of many enzymes involved in DNA methylation, histone methylation and acetylation, and chromatin remodeling, consequently controlling plant growth and development, and responses to diverse environmental stresses. In recent years, much progress has been made in understanding the functional mechanisms of epigenetic modifications and the roles of redox mediators in controlling gene expression in plants. However, the integrated view of the mechanisms for redox regulation of the epigenetic marks is limited. In this review, we summarize recent advances on the roles and mechanisms of redox components in regulating multiple epigenetic modifications, with a focus of the functions of ROS, NO, and multiple antioxidants in plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Shibin He
- Correspondence: (S.H.); (F.H.); Tel.: +86-371-23881387 (F.H.)
| | - Fushun Hao
- Correspondence: (S.H.); (F.H.); Tel.: +86-371-23881387 (F.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tikhodeyev ON. The mechanisms of epigenetic inheritance: how diverse are they? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2018; 93:1987-2005. [PMID: 29790249 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 04/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Although epigenetic inheritance (EI) is a rapidly growing field of modern biology, it still has no clear place in fundamental genetic concepts which are traditionally based on the hereditary role of DNA. Moreover, not all mechanisms of EI attract the same attention, with most studies focused on DNA methylation, histone modification, RNA interference and amyloid prionization, but relatively few considering other mechanisms such as stable inhibition of plastid translation. Herein, we discuss all known and some hypothetical mechanisms that can underlie the stable inheritance of phenotypically distinct hereditary factors that lack differences in DNA sequence. These mechanisms include (i) regulation of transcription by DNA methylation, histone modifications, and transcription factors, (ii) RNA splicing, (iii) RNA-mediated post-transcriptional silencing, (iv) organellar translation, (v) protein processing by truncation, (vi) post-translational chemical modifications, (vii) protein folding, and (viii) homologous and non-homologous protein interactions. The breadth of this list suggests that any or almost any regulatory mechanism that participates in gene expression or gene-product functioning, under certain circumstances, may produce EI. Although the modes of EI are highly variable, in many epigenetic systems, stable allelic variants can be distinguished. Irrespective of their nature, all such alleles have an underlying similarity: each is a bimodular hereditary unit, whose features depend on (i) a certain epigenetic mark (epigenetic determinant) in the DNA sequence or its product, and (ii) the DNA sequence itself (DNA determinant; if this is absent, the epigenetic allele fails to perpetuate). Thus, stable allelic epigenetic inheritance (SAEI) does not contradict the hereditary role of DNA, but involves additional molecular mechanisms with no or almost no limitations to their variety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg N Tikhodeyev
- Department of Genetics & Biotechnology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Analysis of sulphur and chlorine induced DNA cytosine methylation alterations in fresh corn (Zea mays L. saccharata and rugosa) leaf tissues by methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) approach. Genes Genomics 2018; 40:913-925. [PMID: 30155706 DOI: 10.1007/s13258-018-0685-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
DNA (cytosine) methylation mechanism is another way through which plants respond to various cues including soil fertility amendments and abiotic stresses, and the mechanism has been used to infer some physiological, biochemical or adaptation processes. Despite numerous studies on global DNA methylation profiling in various crop species, however, researches on fresh corn (Zea mays L. saccharata or rugosa) remain largely unreported. The study aimed at investigating sulphur and chlorine induced DNA methylation changes in the fresh corn leaves of field-grown plants at the milk stage. Methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) technique was used to profile sulphur (S) and chlorine (Cl) induced DNA methylation patterns, levels and polymorphism alterations at the CCGG sites in fresh corn leaves of TDN21, JKN2000 and JKN928 hybrid cultivars. Twelve primer pairs used effectively detected 325 MSAP bands, exhibiting differentially methylated sites in the genomic DNA of all the three cultivars, with control showing higher (48.9-56.3%) type I bands as compared to sulphur (34.8-44.9%) and chlorine (40.9-47.4%) treatment samples. Consequently, total methylation levels were greater in S and Cl treatment samples than control; accounting for 43.7-59.7, 51.1-65.2 and 46.8-55.1% of total sites in TDN21, JKN2000 and JKN928, respectively. Full methylation of the internal cytosine was greater than hemi-methylation. Further, demethylation polymorphic loci significantly exceeded methylation polymorphic loci, being greater in S than Cl and control samples in all cultivars. Sulphur and chlorine have a profound influence on DNA methylation patterns and levels at the milk stage, principally by increasing the demethylation loci in the internal cytosine of the fresh corn genome. We speculate that these methylation alterations play an integral role in photosynthates assimilation and physiochemical pathways regulating quality parameters in kernels, as well as abiotic stress responses in fresh corn.
Collapse
|