Long term follow-up of very low birthweight infants from a neonatal volume versus pressure mechanical ventilation trial

Ventilator Management in Extremely Preterm Infants

Advances in ventilation strategies for infants in the NICU have led to increased survival of extremely preterm infants. More than 75% of infants born at less than or equal to 27 weeks' gestation require initial mechanical ventilation for survival due to developmental immaturity of their lungs and respiratory drive. Various ventilators using different technologies and involving multiple management strategies are available for use in this population. Centers across the world have successfully used conventional, high-frequency oscillatory and high-frequency jet ventilation to manage respiratory failure in extremely preterm infants. This review explores the existing evidence for each mode of ventilation and the importance of individualizing ventilator management strategies when caring for extremely preterm infants.

Technology in the delivery room supporting the neonatal healthcare provider's task

Very preterm infants are a unique and highly vulnerable group of patients that have a narrow physiological margin within which interventions are safe and effective. The increased understanding of the foetal to neonatal transition marks the intricacy of the rapid and major physiological changes that take place, making delivery room stabilisation and resuscitation an increasingly complex and sophisticated activity for caregivers to perform. While modern, automated technologies are progressively implemented in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to enhance the caregivers in providing the right care for these patients, the technology in the delivery room still lags far behind. Diligent translation of well-known and promising technological solutions from the NICU to the delivery room will allow for better support of the caregivers in performing their tasks. In this review we will discuss the current technology used for stabilisation of preterm infants in the delivery room and how this could be optimised in order to further improve care and outcomes of preterm infants in the near future.

Modes and strategies for providing conventional mechanical ventilation in neonates

Neonatal respiratory failure is a common and serious clinical problem which in a considerable proportion of infants requires invasive mechanical ventilation. The basic goal of mechanical ventilation is to restore lung function while limiting ventilator-induced lung injury, which is considered an important risk factor in the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Over the last decades, new conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) modalities have been introduced in clinical practice, aiming to assist clinicians in providing lung protective ventilation strategies. These modalities use more sophisticated techniques to improve patient-ventilator interaction and transfer control of ventilation from the operator to the patient. Knowledge on how these new modalities work and how they interact with lung physiology is essential for optimal and safe use. In this review, we will discuss some important basic lung physiological aspects for applying CMV, the basic principles of the old and new CMV modalities, and the evidence to support their use in daily clinical practice.

Predicting Lung Health Trajectories for Survivors of Preterm Birth

Rates of preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation) are increasing worldwide. Improved perinatal care has markedly increased survival of very (<32 weeks gestation) and extremely (<28 weeks gestation) preterm infants, however, long term respiratory sequalae are common among survivors. Importantly, individual's lung function trajectories are determined early in life and tend to track over the life course. Preterm infants are impacted by antenatal, postnatal and early life perturbations to normal lung growth and development, potentially resulting in significant shifts from the "normal" lung function trajectory. This review summarizes what is currently known about the long-term lung function trajectories in survivors of preterm birth. Further, this review highlights how antenatal, perinatal and early life factors are likely to contribute to individual lung health trajectories across the life course.

How best to capture the respiratory consequences of prematurity?

Chronic respiratory morbidity is a common complication of premature birth, generally defined by the presence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, both clinically and in trials of respiratory therapies. However, recent data have highlighted that bronchopulmonary dysplasia does not correlate with chronic respiratory morbidity in older children born preterm. Longitudinally evaluating pulmonary morbidity from early life through to childhood provides a more rational method of defining the continuum of chronic respiratory morbidity of prematurity, and offers new insights into the efficacy of neonatal respiratory interventions. The changing nature of preterm lung disease suggests that a multimodal approach using dynamic lung function assessment will be needed to assess the efficacy of a neonatal respiratory therapy and predict the long-term respiratory consequences of premature birth. Our aim is to review the literature regarding the long-term respiratory outcomes of neonatal respiratory strategies, the difficulties of assessing dynamic lung function in infants, and potential new solutions.

Better measures are needed to predict chronic respiratory morbidity in survivors born prematurely http://ow.ly/1L3n30ihq9C

Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in neonates

BACKGROUND

Damage caused by lung overdistension (volutrauma) has been implicated in the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Modern neonatal ventilation modes can target a set tidal volume as an alternative to traditional pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) using a fixed inflation pressure. Volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) aims to produce a more stable tidal volume in order to reduce lung damage and stabilise the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2).

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether VTV compared with PLV leads to reduced rates of death and death or BPD in newborn infants and to determine whether use of VTV affected outcomes including air leak, cranial ultrasound findings and neurodevelopment.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 12), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 13 January 2017), Embase (1980 to 13 January 2017) and CINAHL (1982 to 13 January 2017). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials. We contacted the principal investigators of studies to obtain supplementary information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing VTV versus PLV in infants of less than 44 weeks' postmenstrual age and reporting clinically relevant outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed risk of bias for each trial using Cochrane methodology. We evaluated quality of evidence for each outcome using GRADE criteria. We tabulated mortality, rates of BPD, short-term clinical outcomes and long-term developmental outcomes.

STATISTICS

for categorical outcomes, we calculated typical estimates for risk ratios (RR), risk differences (RD) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB). For continuous variables, we calculated typical estimates for mean differences (MD). We used 95% confidence intervals (CI) and assumed a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty randomised trials met our inclusion criteria; 16 parallel trials (977 infants) and four cross-over trials (88 infants). No studies were blinded and the quality of evidence for outcomes assessed varied from moderate to low.We found no difference in the primary outcome, death before hospital discharge, between VTV modes versus PLV modes (typical RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.07; low quality evidence). However, there was moderate quality evidence that the use of VTV modes resulted in a reduction in the primary outcome, death or BPD at 36 weeks' gestation (typical RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.89; typical NNTB 8, 95% CI 5 to 20) and the following secondary outcomes: rates of pneumothorax (typical RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.87; typical NNTB 20, 95% CI 11 to 100), mean days of mechanical ventilation (MD -1.35 days, 95% CI -1.83 to -0.86), rates of hypocarbia (typical RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.72; typical NNTB 3, 95% CI 2 to 5), rates of grade 3 or 4 intraventricular haemorrhage (typical RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.77; typical NNTB 11, 95% CI 7 to 25) and the combined outcome of periventricular leukomalacia with or without grade 3 or 4 intraventricular haemorrhage (typical RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.80; typical NNTB 11, 95% CI 7 to 33). VTV modes were not associated with any increased adverse outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Infants ventilated using VTV modes had reduced rates of death or BPD, pneumothoraces, hypocarbia, severe cranial ultrasound pathologies and duration of ventilation compared with infants ventilated using PLV modes. Further studies are needed to identify whether VTV modes improve neurodevelopmental outcomes and to compare and refine VTV strategies.

Lung-protective ventilatory strategies in intubated preterm neonates with RDS

This article provides a narrative review of lung-protective ventilatory strategies (LPVS) in intubated preterm infants with RDS. A description of strategies is followed by results on short-and long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Strategies will include patient-triggered or synchronized ventilation, volume targeted ventilation, the technique of intubation, surfactant administration and rapid extubation to NCPAP (INSURE), the open lung concept, strategies of high-frequency ventilation, and permissive hypercapnia. Based on this review single recommendations on optimal LPVS cannot be made. Combinations of several strategies, individually applied, most probably minimize or avoid potential serious respiratory and cerebral complications like bronchopulmonary dysplasia and cerebral palsy.

Invasive and non-invasive ventilation for prematurely born infants - current practice in neonatal ventilation

Non-invasive techniques, include nasal continuous positive airways pressure (nCPAP), nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and heated, humidified, high flow cannula (HHFNC). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of nCPAP versus ventilation have given mixed results, but one demonstrated fewer respiratory problems during infancy. Meta-analysis demonstrated NIPPV rather than nCPAP provided better support post extubation. After extubation or initial support HHFNC has similar efficacy to CPAP. Invasive techniques include those that synchronise inflations with the patient's respiratory efforts. Assist control/ synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation compared to non triggered modes only reduce the duration of ventilation. Further data are required to determine the efficacy of proportional assist ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. Other techniques aim to minimise volutrauma. RCTs of volume targeted ventilation demonstrated reductions in BPD and respiratory medication usage at follow-up. Prophylactic high frequency oscillatory ventilation does not reduce BPD, but is associated with superior lung function at school age.

Volume guarantee pressure support ventilation in extremely preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 months

OBJECTIVE

Compared with pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), volume-targeted ventilation is associated with decreased neonatal complications, including the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. However, little is known about its effect on neurodevelopmental outcome. We evaluated the hypothesis that as compared with PCV, volume-targeted ventilation reduces the risk of the combined outcome of neurodevelopmental impairment or death in very low birth weight infants.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied a cohort of extremely preterm infants managed with either volume guarantee pressure support ventilation (VGPSV; n=135) or PCV (n=135). Infants were evaluated at 18 months adjusted age with a standardized neurological examination and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-third edition. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of ventilation mode and neurodevelopmental outcome.

RESULT

Rates of pulmonary interstitial emphysema (odds ratio 0.6; 95% confidence limits: 0.4, 0.8), hypotension (odds ratio: 0.7; 95% confidence limits: 0.5, 0.9) and mortality (odds ratio 0.45; 95% confidence limits: 0.22, 0.9) were lower among infants treated with VGPSV. The infants in the VGPSV group had a significantly shorter duration on mechanical ventilation compared with infants in the PCV group (log-rank test P<0.01). Seventy percent (155/221) of survivors were evaluated at 18 months adjusted age. A trend towards benefit for the combined outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment was seen in the VGPSV group but did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence limits: 0.32, 1.08).

CONCLUSION

VGPSV was associated with a decreased risk of short-term complications but not long-term developmental impairment in this modest-sized cohort.

Acute Neonatal Respiratory Failure

Acute respiratory failure requiring assisted ventilation is one of the most common reasons for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Respiratory failure is the inability to maintain either normal delivery of oxygen to the tissues or normal removal of carbon dioxide from the tissues. It occurs when there is an imbalance between the respiratory workload and ventilatory strength and endurance. Definitions are somewhat arbitrary but suggested laboratory criteria for respiratory failure include two or more of the following: PaCO₂ > 60 mmHg, PaO₂ < 50 mmHg or O₂ saturation <80 % with an FiO₂ of 1.0 and pH < 7.25 (Wen et al. 2004).

Neonatal ventilation strategies and long-term respiratory outcomes

Long-term respiratory morbidity is common, particularly in those born very prematurely and who have developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), but it does occur in those without BPD and in infants born at term. A variety of neonatal strategies have been developed, all with short-term advantages, but meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that only volume-targeted ventilation and prophylactic high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) may reduce BPD. Few RCTs have incorporated long-term follow-up, but one has demonstrated that prophylactic HFOV improves respiratory and functional outcomes at school age, despite not reducing BPD. Results from other neonatal interventions have demonstrated that any impact on BPD may not translate into changes in long-term outcomes. All future neonatal ventilation RCTs should have long-term outcomes rather than BPD as their primary outcome if they are to impact on clinical practice.

Volume-targeted ventilation is more suitable than pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) compared with pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) in preterm infants.

METHOD

We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2013), PubMed (1966 to 5 March 2013), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and periodical databases (1979 to 5 March 2013). We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of VTV versus PLV as active interventions in preterm infants. We performed meta-analyses using the Cochrane statistical package RevMan 5.0.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials met our inclusion criteria. There was no evidence that VTV modes reduced the incidence of death (relative risk (RR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.05). The use of VTV modes resulted in a reduction in the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.82) and duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -2.0 days, 95% CI -3.14 to -0.86). VTV modes also resulted in reductions in intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.99), grade 3/4 IVH (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.79), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.72), pneumothorax (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.93), failure of primary mode of ventilation (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.94), hypocarbia (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.96), mean airway pressure (MD -0.54 cmH2O, 95% CI -1.05 to -0.02) and days of supplemental oxygen administration (MD -1.68 days, 95% CI -2.47 to -0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm infants ventilated using VTV modes had reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of BPD, failure of primary mode of ventilation, hypocarbia, grade 3/4 IVH, pneumothorax and PVL compared with preterm infants ventilated using PLV modes. There was no evidence that infants ventilated with VTV modes had reduced death compared to infants ventilated using PLV modes.

Volume-limited and volume-targeted ventilation

This article shows that volume-targeted ventilation is physiologically more logical than pressure-limited ventilation, and is associated with a reduced risk of pneumothorax, hypocarbia, duration of ventilation, death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Therefore, it should now be adopted as the main mode for mechanical ventilation of preterm neonates.

Impact of volume guarantee on synchronized ventilation in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether the addition of volume guarantee (VG) to triggered ventilation decreases the duration of ventilation in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

Infants were randomized into two groups to initially receive either assist/control (A/C) or A/C plus VG ventilation and then weaned with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) or SIMV plus VG.

RESULTS

Forty-five infants were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics, values of tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), fraction of inspired oxygen, carbon dioxide tension, and pH were similar for all participating infants initially. During the follow-up, the VT levels were more stable, and the PIP levels were significantly decreasing in the VG group. Although the duration of ventilation was shorter in the VG group, this trend was not statistically significant. The incidences of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) were not significantly different, but the combined outcome of death or BPD was lower in the VG group. Although the VG group experienced less frequent BPD, periventricular leukomalacia, and intraventricular hemorrhage, these differences were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

The VG option, when combined with A/C (in the acute phase of RDS) and SIMV (in the weaning), reduced VT variability, and may have shortened the duration of ventilation in VLBW infants. Overall mortality and BPD rates did not change, but their combined outcome was significantly improved in infants treated with VG modes as compared to those treated with synchronized pressure-limited modes alone.

Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The causes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) are multifactorial. Overdistension of the lung (volutrauma) is considered an important contribution. As an alternative to traditional pressure-limited ventilation (PLV), modern neonatal ventilators offer modes which can target a set tidal volume.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether volume-targeted neonatal ventilation, compared with PLV, reduces death or BPD.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using the methodology of the Neonatal Review Group of the Cochrane Collaboration. A comprehensive literature search was undertaken, and data for prespecified outcomes were combined where appropriate using the fixed effects model.

RESULTS

Nine trials were eligible. Volume-targeted ventilation resulted in a reduction in: the combined outcome of death or BPD [typical relative risk, RR, 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.93), numbers needed to treat, NNT, 8 (95% CI 5-33)], the incidence of pneumothorax [typical RR 0.46 (95% CI 0.25-0.84), NNT 17 (95% CI 10-100)], days of ventilation [weighted mean difference 0.8 days (log-transformed data, p = 0.05)], hypocarbia (pCO(2) <35 mm Hg/4.7 kPa); [typical RR 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.96), NNT 4 (95% CI 2-25)], and the combined outcome of periventricular leukomalacia or grade 3-4 intraventricular hemorrhage [typical RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.28-0.84), NNT 11 (95% CI 7-50)].

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with PLV, infants ventilated using volume-targeted ventilation had reduced death/BPD, duration of ventilation, pneumothoraces, hypocarbia and periventricular leukomalacia/severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Further studies are needed to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate

BACKGROUND

Damage caused by lung overdistension (volutrauma) has been implicated in the development bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Modern neonatal ventilation modes can target a set tidal volume as an alternative to traditional pressure-limited ventilation using a fixed inflation pressure. Volume targeting aims to produce a more stable tidal volume in order to reduce lung damage and stabilise pCO(2)

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) compared with pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) leads to reduced rates of death and BPD in newborn infants. Secondary objectives were to determine whether use of VTV affected outcomes including air leak, cranial ultrasound findings and neurodevelopment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy comprised searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE PubMed 1966 to January 2010, and hand searches of reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing the use of volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in infants of less than 28 days corrected age.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials and extracted data independently. When appropriate, meta-analysis was conducted to provide a pooled estimate of effect. For categorical data the relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Number needed to treat was calculated when RD was statistically significant. Continuous data were analysed using weighted mean difference.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve randomised trials met our inclusion criteria; nine parallel trials (629 infants) and three crossover trials (64 infants).The use of VTV modes resulted in a reduction in the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia [typical RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.93), NNT8 (95% CI 5 to 33)]. VTV modes also resulted in reductions in pneumothorax [typical RR 0.46 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.84), NNT 17 (95% CI 10 to 100)], days of ventilation [MD -2.36 (95% CI -3.9 to -0.8)], hypocarbia [typical RR 0.56 (95%CI 0.33 to 0.96), NNT 4 (95% CI 2 to 25)] and the combined outcome of periventricular leukomalacia or grade 3-4 intraventricular haemorrhage [typical RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.84), NNT 11 (95% CI 7 to 50)].

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Infants ventilated using VTV modes had reduced death and chronic lung disease compared with infants ventilated using PLV modes. Further studies are needed to identify whether VTV modes improve neurodevelopmental outcomes and to compare and refine VTV strategies.

Ventilatory management and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

Improvements in antenatal and neonatal care have resulted in increased survival of very preterm infants. However, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has not changed, probably as a consequence of a demographic shift. The underlying pathophysiology of BPD appears to differ for the current population of preterm infants compared to that described by Northway et al., and management strategies should be targeted to limit ventilator-induced lung injury. Non-invasive respiratory support techniques are currently under evaluation, but results of the trials have thus far failed to show a reduction in BPD. This review will focus upon various ventilation modalities for preventing and managing bronchopulmonary dysplasia.